My views on Israel and Gaza.

Anne sent me this response to an article I published. I hope she doesn’t mind me putting it up here. I will address it after.

Hi Opher, I realised you were away, celebrating your birthday when I posted this reply to a piece on your blog. Now, presumably, it’s too long ago for you to have noticed it. I would appreciate a comment on it, from you, though.I wonder where you stand? I was confused when I read this That’s why I’ve taken so long to reply. I couldn’t be sure how much was ‘our extreme right wing friend’ and how much was you. As you know, I am very committed to the struggle of Palestinians. I do not believe ‘Israel’ has any right to defend itself. The UN should never have made it into a country. The UK set the whole thing in motion with the Balfour Declaration (although that did state that Palestinians should not be displaced, or lose their rights).. The UK gave up its mandate because of a terrorist campaign by Zionists, and abstained in the vote that gave ‘Israel’ statehood. Ever since ‘Israel’ declared independence, it has displaced, killed, raped, imprisoned and humiliated Palestinians. I would not object to Jews being in Palestine, but only as part of a state where everyone was free and equal. They are almost all immigrants, or descended from immigrants. Palestinuans have been there all the time. The claims written in that old book they call the Bible aren’t worth the paper they are written on. It was in response to the horrible treatment Palestinians have suffered since 1948 that October 7th happened. That doesn’t justify it, but it does explain it. I am sure it was supposed to be a hostage-taking exercise, not what it turned out to be. The question of how many Jews were killed, and by whom, is still open. Many of us believe ‘the Hannibal Directive’ cost many lives. There is also the question of why one of the most heavily guarded borders in the world was so easily breached. At the very least, the IDF had been told there was no real threat and they could relax. At the worst: who knows? Hamas had not held elections for many years. When they were elected, there was a bitter struggle with the Palestinian Authority, which led to a severing of political relations. However, Hamas was a functioning civil authority as well as a militant organisation. It ran hospitals, police, schools and all infrastructure. It did not need to be bombed out of existence. ‘Israel’ has shown that it can assassinate people without much collateral damage. They could have killed the military leaders without flattening the country. ‘Israel’ only needs to defend itself because it has stolen the land of the indigenous people. Before the Zionists came to power, and before the huge waves of immigration after WWII (much of them brought about by ‘Israel!’ appealing to Jews worldwide, who were not refugees, to come to build the country) Jews and Muslims got along fairly well in Palestine. What ‘Israel’ seems to be doing is using Hamas as an excuse for a shameless land-grab – part of the ‘Greater Israel Project’. In short, I believe that the only viable solution is a single state one, with all people having equal rights. That would need to be very firmly controlled by an international peacekeeping force. That’s a pipedream It almost certainly won’t happen, but I can’t see anything else working.

Enter

Anne
Anne Gregory

It was this piece you posted on 21st May. https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1Ajw83bYEE/

Here’s what I think:

a. Israel has no historical claim to the land.

b. Referring to ancient religious documents to justify taking land is absurd. It’s like Britain claiming the USA and Australia but even more ridiculous. Religion is a manmade fantasy to my mind. It can’t be used to justify anything. We might as well lay claim to France because of King Arthur and Merlin the wizard. The Old Testament is as much fairy tale in my view. It is no justification for stealing land. There is no legitimacy.

c. However, nearly all nations are built on conquest. Israel is no exception. They took the land by force and I believe that enough time has passed; they should be recognised as a sovereign country.

d. I believe the Palestinians, who owned the land, and have been displaced should now be properly compensated. I do not believe there will be an end to this conflict until that has been done.

e. I believe the Palestinians have been treated harshly, made into 2nd class citizens and have been subjected to racism. This long-term abuse is part of the problem.

f. I believe the war run by Hamas, with rockets and attacks on Israeli citizens is not the way to go. Hamas is a terrorist organisation and while I can understand the anger I cannot condone it.

g. I believe the attack by Hamas on on October 7th 2023 (from the accounts I have read) was barbaric and cannot be justified. Hamas should immediately return all hostages. Whether there was Israeli collusion (In order to justify the destruction of Gaza) is open to investigation. What Hamas did in killing, raping and torturing was disgusting.

h. I believe Israel has justification in going for Hamas.

I. I do not believe they are justified in going for hospitals, schools, refugee camps or civilian areas. These are war crimes.

J. I believe that deliberately withholding food, water and medicine as weapons of war against civilians is barbaric, definite war crimes and amounts to genocide.

K. I believe Netanyahu and his extreme cabinet are war criminals and their actions are fascist to the extreme. They should be tried for their crimes. They put all Palestinians in the same category (as terrorist Hamas supporters) and that justifies killing them all in their eyes.

L. I believe in a negotiated two nation solution with land and reparation given to the Palestinian people. The alternative – a single-nation state, based on complete equality, is nigh-on impossible given the level of hatred on both sides.

M. I believe violence on both sides is wrong. Negotiation and reparation are the only way forward.

N. I believe Trump has made things worse by empowering Netanyahu to do as he pleases. Netanyahu is being used by extreme religious groups and has to keep going at war to hold his fascist coalition together and keep himself out of court.

O. I believe the UN needs to step in.

P. I believe that violence perpetuates more violence; death generates hate and we are locked in a cycle of revenge.

You’re out of Luck

You’re out of Luck

You may be the strongest,

                Bravest and fittest,

But a missile doesn’t care!

You may have all the skills,

                Be great at fighting,

But it’d still catch you unaware.

You may think that you’re so tough

                So macho and invincible

But a drone doesn’t give a fuck.

You can hide in the strongest shelter

                When the button is pressed

You’re plum out of luck!

Opher 3.5.2022

There’s nothing tough and macho about war. No man is safe from a missile.

The big, strong, skilful macho men used to be highly valued. They kept us all safe. Not any more. They’re the ones we have to be wary off. They are the trouble-makers.

I war you see the swagger melt away. No muscles are hard enough to stop bullets and shrapnel.

The guys who are in charge are safe in bunkers pushing buttons.

If you survive a war it’s all down to luck.

There’s nothing, nothing, nothing, good about war.

Social Cohesion – Good or Bad? A future for the world or anarchy and barbarity?

Long ago we made a big decision; to give up our hunter gatherer way of life and embrace farming.

It changed us from a system of nomadic small bands of hunters into a sedentary group of farmers. It gave us ownership of land and tools. It put us against nature.

Agriculture enabled us to survive in large numbers and create civilisations. We developed trade and cities. We grew into huge social groups, developed kings, nations and religions.

Instead of being tribes of a few hundred we became nations of millions.

In order to unify people there had to be social cohesion. We invested in strong leaders – fearsome warrior-kings like Ghenghis Khan, Richard The Lion-heart, Saladin or Constantine. We invented religions – Islam, Bhuddism, Hinduism, Christianity, Shinto, Judaism. We invented Emperors, Kings, Queens and Ayatollahs. We invented political systems – capitalism, communism, anarchism, socialism, liberalism, democracy, theocracy. We invented national cultures and identity.

With people united behind a set of shared values anything was possible. It was possible to raise armies, conquer and loot, build cities, raise taxes and carry out monumental tasks such as the building of cathedrals, temples, pyramids, banks, cities, palaces and hydrogen bombs.

The millions of people within a nation were united by a shared identity. They wore similar clothes, spoke the same language, worshipped the same god, followed the same laws, had a shared history, looked the same, performed the same rituals, gave allegiance to the same leader, paid taxes and thus invested in the structure of the culture, and supported the political system. It unified people so that strangers could live side by side. It enabled people to live in huge cities with the minimum of violence and discord. It enabled wars and conflict with competing nations.

It also spawned great inequalities as powerful kings, aristocrats and religious leaders took a large chunk of the produce and merchants became wealthy at the expense of the working people.

Social cohesion has created the world we live in.

Social cohesion is very powerful. People believe in it.

It made gods out of leaders. The Japanese created Shinto – a religions cobbled together out of many sources in which the Emperor was deified as a descendant of the Sun God.

From the outside this looks absurd. But people felt strongly enough to sacrifice their lives for him in Kamikaze suicide missions.

Sunni and Shia Muslims follow the same Koran and the same prophet but a disagreement over lineage has resulted in extreme hatred.

To an outsider it is absurd. Yet inside the religions the doctrine is sufficient to have martyrs blowing themselves up in mosques full of women and children.

We have the same with Muslim and Jew, Capitalist and Communist, Catholic and Protestant.

All equally fabricated and absurd.

We look at other cultures with their silly costumes, strange rituals, dietary requirements, prayers, beliefs, pageants, uniforms, parades and shows of allegiance with a range of emotions. We are amused, interested, amazed, horrified, bewildered, astounded and in awe.

We find aspects quaint, absurd, ridiculous, impressive, worrying, bewildering and often beyond belief.

Do people really believe these things are are they playing lip service?

Yet we accept our own rituals, beliefs, absurdities and laws as normal and rational.

From birth we are indoctrinated into our culture. We are brainwashed by our family, our community, our schools, our places of worship, our rituals, customs, political leaders and social leaders, to accept the norm, work within the narrow parameters and follow the guidelines.

Through patriotism, religious belief, fealty to the monarch, national pride, racial unity and faith in the law of the land we allow ourselves to be ruled.

In a new country like America it takes the form of the daily ritual of the vow of allegiance and the symbol of the stars and stripes. In North Korea it is stringent conformity and shows of hysterical support to their leader Kim Jung-Un. We see similar fanaticism towards various political and religious leaders around the world.

There are undoubtedly good things that have come out of this ‘civilisation’. We have certainly prospered. Our numbers have greatly increased, our health has improved, our living standards are much higher (at least for many), we have glorious works of art and architecture and incredible science. Our technology is mind boggling.

All the result of social cohesion harnessing the power of millions of people.

On the downside it has created tyrants, mass starvation, war, poverty, extreme inequality, slavery and servitude, genital mutilation, nationalism, fascism, racism and genocide.

Would-be leaders have exploited social cohesion in order to gain power. They have exploited racism, religious doctrines and nationalism to create fear, hate and division in order to propel them to power.

Is it possible that in this modern age we are witnessing the breakdown of social cohesion?

With global travel, the internet and the mixing of races the demes of human culture are dissolving. It is hard for national or local groups to retain their customs and beliefs when there is no rational basis. Why should it be mandatory to wear a veil and be subservient to men when most women do not have to? Why should a black not not be president of the USA? The French girl I met last year was really nice – do we have to hate them all?

Religious beliefs are being questioned.

Political systems are being questioned.

National customs and dress are being questioned.

More mixing is taking place. We are no longer living in homogenous groups.

Of course, this has created great fear and concern. People feel secure within the customs they have grown up with. They want to hang on to them. They feel an affinity to them. They are afraid that their dearly held customs and beliefs are being discarded or, even worse, usurped by immigrants. They certainly don’t want to live under someone else’s patently ridiculous or draconianly restrictive, even barbaric, customs.

It has resulted in a spate of extreme nationalism founded on xenophobia and racism resulting in populist politics – Trump, Erdogan, Johnson, Bolsonaro, Modi and Brexit. It has resulted in ISIS, Boko Haram, the Taliban and Kim Jung-Un.

The question remains – is this a phase?

When people lose their faith in Kings/Queens, politicians, religions and even national customs, is there something better the other side of that?

It seems to me that we are at a crossroads.

Do we produce a new narrative that is more powerful than the previous narratives?

Do we create a global story that we can all believe in? A story that is rational, with a place for us all, that is tolerant, respectful, and allows freedom?

Astory that goes beyond religion, race, culture and nationality?

I think we have a choice.

We either create a global village that encompasses all humanity and nature and enables us all to flourish or the social cohesions dissolve and we end up with anarchy and destruction.

With 8 billion people we cannot go back to our hunter gatherer way of life. Without social cohesion we cannot live peacefully in communities. The breakdown of social cohesion would create chaos, power struggles, warlords and Mad Max. It would result in mass violence and starvation.

The present wave of populistic nationalism is causing immense environmental destruction and fueling international conflict.

I believe this is a unique period of history.

We have the opportunity to build something really great or descend into barbarity.

Human Rights – Saudi Arabia – the public flogging of Raif Badawi – a blogger who criticised the government.

In Saudi Arabia if you dare to criticise the government you can find yourself imprisoned and sentenced to 1000 lashes.

That is barbaric and uncivilised. That is a transgression of human rights.

Just after Friday prayers on 9 January, Raif Badawi was led by Saudi officials out of a bus and into the middle of the square in front of al-Jafali mosque in Jeddah. A large crowd had gathered to see the flogging.

Raif stood in the middle of the crowd, handcuffed and shackled by his ankles, his face uncovered. A security officer approached Raif and began caning him across the back and legs, until he had been beaten 50 times. A witness told us it took just five minutes to cane Raif 50 times; the lashes were constant and quick.

‘Raif raised his head towards the sky, closing his eyes and arching his back. He was silent, but you could tell from his face and his body that he was in real pain.’

Read more at this link – it is disturbing!

https://www.amnesty.org.uk/actions/saudi-arabia-free-raif-badawi-flogged-blogger?gclid=Cj0KEQjwzPSrBRC_oOXfxPWP6t0BEiQARqav2CktigcnuuaokzNGKj9on1Hr_yEmlbUmU3VlFJLLOXoaAnsj8P8HAQ

It is beyond me why anyone would support such a barbarous religion – can someone explain?

Islam is the fastest growing religion.
How can that be?
There is no clearer example of misogyny, cruelty, barbarism, intolerance, indoctrination, primitive behaviour, mindlessness or lack of morality anywhere else.
Why is it such a draw to young people?
The end result of that fanaticism is a world without music, tolerance or love.
Do we really want our women in shackles, subservient and side-lined?
It looks like a mediaeval nightmare to me!

Why not build a fair, tolerant zeitgeist and a world of love, tolerance and equality?

Religion is an excuse for the powerful to control everyone else!

Can anyone explain?