Claude Malhuret speaking to the French Senate Tuesday March 4 2025. The new Enemy!

Transcript below of an incredibly powerful and deadly accurate speech in the French Senate two days ago by Mr. Claude Malhuret. This may some day take its rightful place alongside the best of Sir Winston Churchill and President John F Kennedy.

Brace yourself:

“President, Mr. Prime Minister, Ladies and Gentlemen Ministers, My dear colleagues,

Europe is at a critical turning point in its history. The American shield is crumbling, Ukraine risks being abandoned, Russia strengthened.

Washington has become the court of Nero, a fiery emperor, submissive courtiers and a ketamine-fueled jester in charge of purging the civil service.

This is a tragedy for the free world, but it is first and foremost a tragedy for the United States. Trump’s message is that there is no point in being his ally since he will not defend you, he will impose more customs duties on you than on his enemies and will threaten to seize your territories while supporting the dictatorships that invade you.

The king of the deal is showing what the art of the deal is all about. He thinks he will intimidate China by lying down before Putin, but Xi Jinping, faced with such a shipwreck, is probably accelerating preparations for the invasion of Taiwan.

Never in history has a President of the United States capitulated to the enemy. Never has anyone supported an aggressor against an ally. Never has anyone trampled on the American Constitution, issued so many illegal decrees, dismissed judges who could have prevented him from doing so, dismissed the military general staff in one fell swoop, weakened all checks and balances, and taken control of social media.

This is not an illiberal drift, it is the beginning of the confiscation of democracy. Let us remember that it took only one month, three weeks and two days to bring down the Weimar Republic and its Constitution.

I have faith in the strength of American democracy, and the country is already protesting. But in one month, Trump has done more harm to America than in four years of his last presidency. We were at war with a dictator, now we are fighting a dictator backed by a traitor.

Eight days ago, at the very moment that Trump was rubbing Macron’s back in the White House, the United States voted at the UN with Russia and North Korea against the Europeans demanding the withdrawal of Russian troops.

Two days later, in the Oval Office, the military service shirker was giving war hero Zelensky lessons in morality and strategy before dismissing him like a groom, ordering him to submit or resign.

Tonight, he took another step into infamy by stopping the delivery of weapons that had been promised. What to do in the face of this betrayal? The answer is simple: face it.

And first of all, let’s not be mistaken. The defeat of Ukraine would be the defeat of Europe. The Baltic States, Georgia, Moldova are already on the list. Putin’s goal is to return to Yalta, where half the continent was ceded to Stalin.

The countries of the South are waiting for the outcome of the conflict to decide whether they should continue to respect Europe or whether they are now free to trample on it.

What Putin wants is the end of the order put in place by the United States and its allies 80 years ago, with its first principle being the prohibition of acquiring territory by force.

This idea is at the very source of the UN, where today Americans vote in favor of the aggressor and against the attacked, because the Trumpian vision coincides with that of Putin: a return to spheres of influence, the great powers dictating the fate of small countries.

Mine is Greenland, Panama and Canada, you are Ukraine, the Baltics and Eastern Europe, he is Taiwan and the China Sea.

At the parties of the oligarchs of the Gulf of Mar-a-Lago, this is called “diplomatic realism.”

So we are alone. But the talk that Putin cannot be resisted is false. Contrary to the Kremlin’s propaganda, Russia is in bad shape. In three years, the so-called second largest army in the world has managed to grab only crumbs from a country three times less populated.

Interest rates at 25%, the collapse of foreign exchange and gold reserves, the demographic collapse show that it is on the brink of the abyss. The American helping hand to Putin is the biggest strategic mistake ever made in a war.

The shock is violent, but it has a virtue. Europeans are coming out of denial. They understood in one day in Munich that the survival of Ukraine and the future of Europe are in their hands and that they have three imperatives.

Accelerate military aid to Ukraine to compensate for the American abandonment, so that it holds, and of course to impose its presence and that of Europe in any negotiation.

This will be expensive. It will be necessary to end the taboo of the use of frozen Russian assets. It will be necessary to circumvent Moscow’s accomplices within Europe itself by a coalition of only the willing countries, with of course the United Kingdom.

Second, demand that any agreement be accompanied by the return of kidnapped children, prisoners and absolute security guarantees. After Budapest, Georgia and Minsk, we know what agreements with Putin are worth. These guarantees require sufficient military force to prevent a new invasion.

Finally, and this is the most urgent, because it is what will take the most time, we must build the neglected European defence, to the benefit of the American umbrella since 1945 and scuttled since the fall of the Berlin Wall.

It is a Herculean task, but it is on its success or failure that the leaders of today’s democratic Europe will be judged in the history books.

Friedrich Merz has just declared that Europe needs its own military alliance. This is to recognize that France has been right for decades in arguing for strategic autonomy.

It remains to be built. It will be necessary to invest massively, to strengthen the European Defence Fund outside the Maastricht debt criteria, to harmonize weapons and munitions systems, to accelerate the entry into the Union of Ukraine, which is today the leading European army, to rethink the place and conditions of nuclear deterrence based on French and British capabilities, to relaunch the anti-missile shield and satellite programs.

The plan announced yesterday by Ursula von der Leyen is a very good starting point. And much more will be needed.

Europe will only become a military power again by becoming an industrial power again. In a word, the Draghi report will have to be implemented. For good.

But the real rearmament of Europe is its moral rearmament.

We must convince public opinion in the face of war weariness and fear, and especially in the face of Putin’s cronies, the extreme right and the extreme left.

They argued again yesterday in the National Assembly, Mr Prime Minister, before you, against European unity, against European defence.

They say they want peace. What neither they nor Trump say is that their peace is capitulation, the peace of defeat, the replacement of de Gaulle Zelensky by a Ukrainian Pétain at the beck and call of Putin.

Peace for the collaborators who have refused any aid to the Ukrainians for three years.

Is this the end of the Atlantic Alliance? The risk is great. But in the last few days, the public humiliation of Zelensky and all the crazy decisions taken in the last month have finally made the Americans react.

Polls are falling. Republican lawmakers are being greeted by hostile crowds in their constituencies. Even Fox News is becoming critical.

The Trumpists are no longer in their majesty. They control the executive, the Parliament, the Supreme Court and social networks.

But in American history, the freedom fighters have always prevailed. They are beginning to raise their heads.

The fate of Ukraine is being played out in the trenches, but it also depends on those in the United States who want to defend democracy, and here on our ability to unite Europeans, to find the means for their common defense, and to make Europe the power that it once was in history and that it hesitates to become again.

Our parents defeated fascism and communism at great cost.

The task of our generation is to defeat the totalitarianisms of the 21st century.

Long live free Ukraine, long live democratic Europe.”

-Claude Malhuret speaking to the French Senate Tuesday March 4 2025. You have just read the transcript of a speech that will live forever in the history books.

New definition of treason!

Remember a short while ago Russia was the enemy?

Remember how a short while ago the West had a NATO alliance to deter the Russian threat?

Remember how a short time ago there was a threat of nuclear war with Russia?

Remember how a short time ago communism was the big scare?

Remember how a short time ago America went to war in Korea, Vietnam and Cambodia to stop the threat of communism?

Remember a while back there was a cold war with the enemy Russia?

Now, under Trump, under MAGA, Putin, the totalitarian dictator, is Trump’s best mate, Russia can ransack Europe – it’s OK, communism is fine!

Now Canada and Europe are the enemy!

If this isn’t Orwellian double-think what is?

But the GOP seem happy with this realignment.

Will the UK find itself at war with both Russia and the USA?

Europe Gets Serious with Russia!!

At least Europe is getting serious! They are not only looking at all the financial sides and manufacturing, they are looking of ways of cutting off Putin’s cash by moving away from gas and oil. They’ve seized oligarch’s yachts and are actually doing what they said. They mean business.

Putin is calling it an act of war!!

It’s a shame that the UK has to be dragged screaming to the party! It’s unlike Johnson not to want to party!! But then the Tory Party is dependant on these slimy Russian billionaires. They are selling them peerages and inviting them into inner government. They are Trump are hand and fist with greedy corrupt Russians.

So What has the EU ever done for us?

So What has the EU ever done for us?

 

Absolutely nothing.  

A bureaucratic nightmare overseen by a bunch of unelected plutocrats!

A bunch of foreigners taking away our sovereignty.

 

Well it has kept the peace in Europe for the last seventy years – the longest period in European history without a major conflict (putting aside Bosnia and the Ukraine).

 

It has provided greater cooperation in fighting crime, terrorism, cybercrime, and trafficking.

 

It has provided Britons with the right to live, work, retire and study anywhere in Europe without hindrance.

 

It has provided laws and enforcement to conserve nature, prevent pollution and protect wildlife.

 

It has produced legislation to protect workers’ rights.

 

It has produced legislation to protect our human rights.

 

It enables us to go abroad safely on holiday without visas, passports and other expensive constraints, making holidays a lot safer and cheaper.

 

It has given us a bigger voice on the world stage when dealing with trade, war, threats, terrorism …..

 

It has made us prosperous, increased trade and business and provided millions of jobs.

 

It has put money into conservation projects, regeneration of deprived areas and inner cities, and business projects that have had enormous impact on regenerating run-down areas and providing work as well, as subsidizing people in areas that otherwise would not be economically viable.

 

It has protected our consumer rights. All goods bought and sold have to comply with standards of safety and quality.

 

It is good for business and has brought huge benefits to this country. Many companies, banks and trading partners work through Britain as an entry point into Europe. We gain all that extra wealth.

 

It has produced millions of jobs and made us wealthier.

 

But we could do all that ourselves!

 

No we couldn’t.

 

We want our sovereignty back!

 

So that our corrupt bunch of politicians can have more power for themselves? What makes them better than the other politicians in Europe?

 

We want to make our own laws!

 

In truth much of the legislation in the Human Rights and Employment etc. was put together by Britain. We have a big say in what goes on in Europe. We play a major role in directing it.

 

We want to control our borders. We have too much immigration and don’t want terrorists coming here!

 

Then why didn’t we sign up to the European legislation to prevent people coming here for longer than three months if they don’t have work?

We will defeat terrorism through our intelligence work, through cooperation rather than building walls.

 

What has Europe done for us? Well you don’t miss your water until your well runs dry.

 

https://www.last.fm/music/Monty+Python/_/What+Have+The+Romans+Ever+Done+For+Us%253F

The real Brexit agenda – my opinion

The real Brexit agenda is for the Right Wing of the Tory party to seize power.

Behind a series of lies and deceit they are selling a pack of untruths.

Leaving the EU will not solve the immigration crisis – it is too complex and requires a lot more than that.

It is not about sovereignty. They want power for themselves.

Brexit is run by a number of extreme right-wing Tories and supported by fascists on the continent.

All Johnson (the opportunist) has his eyes on is power. Fox, Gove and the rest are obnoxious extremists.

A vote to leave will put them in control, signal a programme of austerity and privatisation, throw the country in chaos, cause a dip in house prices and a fall in the economy. An unmitigated disaster.

Their whole campaign is based on fear and hatred.

I have a real fear on this one. The result could be abysmal – worse than any general election.

My greatest fears should we vote to leave Europe.

DSC_0467

  1. We end up with a rabid right-wing government led by Johnson, Gove and Fox.
  2. That would spell mass privatisation and the decimation of our public services (schools and NHS are already suffering under the more moderate Tories with creeping privatisation and reduced funding)
  3. Human rights, workers rights and conditions and pay would be undermined.
  4. Deregulation would run slip-shod over environmental and health and safety in pursuit of profits.
  5. Our economy would drop through the floor causing decades of austerity and further excuse to decimate public services.
  6. The banking and insurance sectors might up sticks to Berlin to be at the centre of Europe which would bankrupt us.
  7. Other businesses might uproot to the mainland if we are no longer part.
  8. We would still be subject to the same bureaucracy and legislation if we wish to trade with Europe but we would have none of the advantages of free movement and no tariffs.
  9. We would have an increased risk of terrorism due to worse cooperation and intelligence exchange.
  10. We would create havoc in areas of the economy requiring free movement of workers.
  11. Our position on the world stage would be reduced. We would not carry much clout.
  12. Europe would be weaker and might split into bickering factions, protectionism and even conflict.
  13. We would have no unified defence against the Soviets.
  14. Our trading position with China, India and others would be weakened.
  15. I think the UK would split up – Scotland would go first.
  16. Our country would be ruled by a bunch of Eton old-boys who would look after their own at the expense of the rest of us. I’d much rather be governed from Europe.

We might descend from being the world’s seventh biggest economy to being a minor island on the fringe of Europe. We produce little, have no resources, no empire and no voice. Our children would live in a Third World country.

That’s my view – what’s yours?

 

Things I like about the European Union and things I don’t like

Things I like:

  1. It has brought peace in Europe for the longest period in history
  2. It has brought in legislation to protect the environment and wild-life
  3. It has brought in legislation to protect workers rights and conditions
  4. It has brought in legislation on essential human rights
  5. It has unified countries in the fight against crime and terrorism
  6. It has created greater cooperation with intelligence gathering
  7. It has greater clout on the world stage and can negotiate better deals
  8. It supports the weaker countries and has helped raise their standards
  9. It has allowed free movement of goods without hindrance
  10. It has allowed me to travel, live and work anywhere in Europe without hindrance
  11. It has opened up European universities to British students
  12. It has opened up European jobs to British workers
  13. It has stimulated the economies of European countries
  14. It has brought prosperity

Things I don’t like:

  1. The freedom of movement has increased our immigration
  2. There is a wastefulness
  3. Corruption and bureaucracy
  4. Opening borders enables criminals and terrorists to move more freely
  5. It costs us money

I come down strongly in favour of staying in despite the negatives.

I think we should work hard on the inside to put a stop to the wastefulness, bureaucracy and corruption and stem the ‘gravy train’.

I think we should finance greater security and intelligence work to track down and arrest criminals and terrorists.

I want freedom of movement but we have to deal with the consequences.

I believe that as the present inequalities in Europe even out there will be less migration. We should focus on the inequalities. We should also look at ways of preventing such large numbers of migrants. I would like to see us working with our European colleagues to solve this (unemployment benefit etc).

Crime, terrorism, pollution, environmental destruction, wild-life protection, human rights and social conditions know no boundaries. They can only be dealt with internationally.

I want a move to global legislation and government with universal laws on environment and human rights.

I have no doubt that we are stronger and safer in and that the present problems can be dealt with through cooperation.

The possible break up of Europe? What would the USA be like if it had split up?

As we surge towards a conclusion to this unnecessary referendum on Brexit or Bremain I cannot help ponder some of the other unknowables.

I have grown up in a world with two superpowers – America and Russia – who took us to the brink of annihilation. I lived for decades with a series of nuclear warheads pointing at me – still do. America dominates the world economic stage and pulls all the shots. It controls the markets.

America is made up of fifty States all of which are really autonomous countries. They are vastly different in culture, geography, size, population, climate, racial mix, resources and wealth.

If they had operated as separate countries would any of them have been a major world player?

If those 50 States all secede from the Union what would happen to America’s power?

The Clash – Should I stay or should I go? – European exit?

Well it just came to me that this should be the song that is associated with the whole question of leaving or staying in the European union

The Clash – Should I stay or should I go

Should I stay or should I go now? (Yo! ¿Me frío o lo soplo?)
Should I stay or should I go now? (Yo! ¿Me frío o lo soplo?)
If I go there will be trouble (Si me voy, va a haber peligro)
And if I stay it will be double (Si me quedo, es doble)
So you gotta let me know (Pero que tienes que decir)
Should I cool it or should I blow? (¿Me frío o lo soplo?)
Should I stay or should I go now? (¿Me frío o lo soplo?)
If I go there will be trouble (Si me voy, va a haber peligro)
And if I stay there will be double (Si me quedo, es doble)
So you gotta let me know (Pero que tienes que decir)
Should I stay or should I go

It’s always shades of grey.

This whole thing should never have arisen in the first place. It was David Cameron playing politics and trying to buy off the right-wingers in his party by offering them this referendum. He’s put the whole country in a mess because of his party politics. Just weakness.

I am in favour of staying. Not because I love the European bureaucracy but despite that.

My reasons are:

  • European collaboration on terrorism
  • A bigger voice on the world stage
  • A greater union – movement towards global government
  • Better economic opportunity
  • No years of wrangling over trade agreements
  • No destabilisation
  • No firms fleeing to set up headquarters in Europe
  • No more wars in Europe
  • We’re safer and better off in
  • Good European laws on Human Rights and workers rights.

I think we’re better off in. I also think that we do not know the facts. It’s all emotional guesswork. I don’t give a knack about sovereignty. I’d prefer to be under European law than what the Tories are doing. The Queen, the establishment, parliament – you can stuff it all.

When I look at the people supporting Brexit they are a rabid bunch of extreme chancers and opportunists. People like Boris who want to use this as an opportunity to become Prime Minister. He doesn’t really believe a word he’s saying. He did an about turn.

No. It’s in for me.

What do you think?

Should we leave the EU or should we stay? What do you think?

These are some of the things that come to my mind. What have I got wrong or missed out?

Some good things about the EU

  1. It helps to keep peace in Europe
  2. It unifies the fight against terrorism
  3. It provides collaboration and centralisation in dealing with pollution and environmental damage
  4. It protects human rights
  5. It provides collaboration and centralisation to deal with crime
  6. It protects workers rights
  7. It has produced a mechanism to deal with some of the inequality
  8. It provides jobs and economic strength
  9. It has a louder voice in the world
  10. It unifies laws, rights and freedoms across Europe

Some bad things

  1. There is greater bureaucracy
  2. There are unelected people involved
  3. It costs money
  4. There is waste
  5. It is cumbersome
  6. It is slow
  7. It isn’t always as effective as it needs to be
  8. There is not enough collaboration
  9. Some countries cheat on the way they apply laws

Some other things

  1. Laws are made by a group in Europe – not nationally. (I prefer that – some find it a problem). I think most of the laws produced by Europe are better and I’d prefer them deciding than the Tories.
  2. I want to move to a global body who rule. Global legislation to deal with war, inequality, poverty, environment, crime, human rights and business. All of which are global and require a body who operate globally. I do not believe that nations have any future. They need dumping. We are world citizens or equal importance. The EU is a step in that direction.
  3. National identity is threatened. Good as far as I’m concerned. I would stand for values – tolerance, democracy, freedom, etc.

My view is that the EU is flawed and needs overhauling to make it work better. That probably means altering the election and decision-making process and requires greater unification.

However, I think that is far better than a bunch of nations all fighting and vying with each other for predominance and gain. That is not only inefficient and wasteful, duplicating roles, not sharing information, undermining each other, and creating division.

My opinion is that we are better off in a powerful Europe than as a small Island. That it is not all about money and whether we would be better off. The Environment, Human Rights and collaboration are more important.

I believe we have to make Europe work a lot better than it is at present and make it more democratic with less control from bankers, big business and bureaucrats.

I’m in favour of staying in!

What do you think?