What is utterly inexcusable is:

Not just the execution of good people – Renee Good and Alex Pretti – which is disgusting and unjustifiable –

But the administrations condoning of these murders. That puts them on a par with Putin and Iran.

You cannot flood cities with armed masked men who violently bully and shoot people with impunity. That is Gestapo tactics. That is what happens in a police state. It is not acceptable in a democratic, free country.

You cannot have those in charge immediately accusing good citizens who are peacefully using their democratic rights to protest being labelled as domestic terrorists. That is diabolical.

You cannot have government goons killing people – firing three shots into a woman’s face from close range – firing ten shots into a nurse shielding two abused women who had been violently shoved over by government thugs – gloatingly saying ‘You Fucking Bitch’ after shooting Renee dead or pumping ten bullets into Alex Pretti and saying ‘Boo Hoo’. That is inexcusable.

You cannot have Trump and Noem lying about the incidents. Renee Good was NOT driving at Jonathan Ross. She was clearly steering away. Alex Pretti had a legally allowable handgun in a holster with no intention of using it. It was taken off him before he was murdered. For Trump and Noem to blatantly lie and justify the murders by saying these two good citizens were domestic terrorists, that Renee was using her car as a weapon, that Alex was armed and dangerous, is a travesty of justice, law and order.

We cannot have the sheer hypocrisy of Trump and his administration. It is alright in their eyes for armed thugs to attack the Capitol and kill police guards while hunting down politicians. It is alright for Kyle Rittenhouse to take to the streets with an assault rifle and kill two people. But it’s not alrght for a law-abiding citizen to have a holstered handgun while filming the violence of masked ICE goons and protecting women from their violence. Talk about dual standards. This administration openly supports extreme right-wing groups like the Oath Takers and Proud Boys (actively recruiting them into ICE) and labels anybody filming ICE activities on their phones as far-left agitators and domestic terrorists. This is fascism in action.

What should have happened is obvious to any civilised person:

Each incident should be fully investigated by unbiased law enforcement and courts and those involved, Jonathan Ross and the nameless masked goons, made to try to justify their actions and be held accountable in a court of law – like any law enforcer.

Fortunately, we have the bravery of bystanders who are prepared to peacefully monitor and record the thuggery. Without them we would only have Trump and Noem’s lying accounts of what is going on. We can see. We have the evidence! Thank you all the brave people of Minnesota!

What is happening in the USA is an outrage – a stain on civilisation. The sooner these incompetent Nazis are out of power the better!

Afghanistan and Iraq are safer!

The USA is becoming a third world country without laws or civilised behaviour.

Far too dangerous unless you’re a Nazi obviously.

https://www.facebook.com/reel/1165716332042930

Flags at half mast.

Who is supporting violence again??

On June 14, 2025, Melissa Hortman, her husband Mark, and their golden retriever Gilbert were shot and killed at their Brooklyn Park home by a man impersonating a police officer.

No flags at half mast.

Kirk wanted the killer bailed!!

Talk about hypocrisy and stupidity!!

Which is the worst religion??

On what basis can you judge a religion?

a. Does it create fear and trauma by threatening people with horrendous ends if they don’t believe? (Hell, brimstone, torture, being outcast)

b. Does it promise ridiculous rewards for believing? (everlasting bliss, 24 virgins, food and drink)

c. Does it require very strict dress codes- particularly for women? (Veils, robes, burqas)

d. Does it insist on draconian rituals – prayers, fasts, attendance, supplication?

e. Does it discriminate against women – separating them into second-class roles or as chattels?

f. Does it advocate violence against people who believe differently?

g. Does it have strict blasphemy laws?

h. Are there severe punishments for disobeying rituals, dress codes, blasphemy or leaving the cult?

i. Do the hierarchy receive privilege and dispensation? Who profits the prophet?

j. Do they use the psychological threat of the fear of death?

k. Just it involve psychological coercion?

A bad religion sets out to hook its victims young and coerce them with fear then trap them in a cycle of ritual. They provide comfort against the fear they have induced. They create a tribal togetherness against the common enemy – everybody else. They hold forth a glorious future – world domination and eternal life.

In my opinion all religions have a series of rather daft creation stories and claims; all were created for political/social reasons; (the Abrahamic religions all stem from tribal Arabic culture with inbuilt misogyny); all suppress science and progress; all are totally intolerant and repressive; all ban and burn books; all slaughter and torture heretics; all indoctrinate children; all set up an elite who are the source of all knowledge and live a privileged life; all go to war and sanction wars. Of course, there are sects like the Quakers, who are opposed to some or all of the above.

Then we have the supportive, positive, mental affirming aspects of religion and the good they do in the community and for the mental health of individuals as a counter measure. All religions do some good. But I contend that the evil they do outweighs the good by a considerable amount.

There are a number of contenders:

Christianity with its witch burning, tortures, public burnings of Catholics, inquisitions, book burnings, indoctrination of children, evangelical patronising of other cultures, bloody massacres, sacking of cities, wars, pogroms and crusades. Intolerance and fear. Hate and stultifying ritual.

Islam with its inbuilt misogyny, beheadings, strict heresy laws, ban on music, destruction of historic sites and removal of art, stonings, mass torture, terrorist bombings, jihads, repression, indoctrination of children, intolerance and violence.

Judaism with its tribal intolerance, violence born of feeling victimised, closed community, indoctrination of children and claustrophobic adherence to ancient script. It kills progress and traps its victims.

Hinduism with its violence towards Muslims and strict rules, its rituals, indoctrination of children and crazy dietary regime.

If I had to choose a religion I think it would be a much more tolerant, less indoctrinated, less misogynistic and more questioning, open religion – maybe Buddhism, Quakerism or some kind of worship of sun and nature. I would acknowledge that all religions bring some degree of comfort, support, security and help that human beings seem to need. I would just contend that the harm they do far exceeds the good.

Fortunately I was never indoctrinated as a kid and I can see these monolithic power structures for what they are. Organised religions are hierarchical power structures. Those at the top do very nicely. The worshippers are easily conned. Culture sucks people in because belief and ritual are the done thing. It’s hard to go against something everybody else seems to believe in. Human minds are frail. We seem to need the comfort of ritual, ceremony and belief in a higher force. We are weak. We cannot cope with death and fall back on promises. We search for answers to big questions and fall for simplistic explanations. I don’t. I still question and see through the simplistic answers and indoctrination.

All the religions above have had their periods of extreme nastiness. If I was choosing the worst religion I would be hard put.

In the past I think it was probably Christianity. It’s violence, torture, misogyny and vindictiveness was unparalleled. But the enlightenment curbed its power and softened its violence. Islam, with its present culture of hatred, revenge and violence, it’s wish for expansion and world domination, has superseded Christianity as the most deplorable.

What are your views?

Caning – The Reality

Caning

Fortunately we live in an era where violence against children is frowned upon. Even smacking is deemed an assault.

Good job too!

In my view (based on personal experience) violence creates violence. It seems to work. It gives that instant gratification that the wrongdoer has suffered and that’s a lesson for all who do wrong, but that disguises the long-term resentment and fury that inevitably comes out further down the line. Violence creates a cycle of anger, revenge, hate and displacement violence. Violence creates more violence. The caned bully would appear contrite then, round the next corner, punch the first kid he encountered.

I was brought up in an age when violence against children was actively encouraged. You could beat your kid senseless. Every school teacher was encouraged to beat discipline into naughty children. Most houses had a cane handy for the correction of children. A smack on the legs or round the ear was mandatory. Children needed discipline.

It all obviously worked didn’t it?

What I recall of my school days is a litany of bullying, daily fights and boiling resentment. My lessons were battlefields.

There is a political dimension to this child abuse. The right-wing hang’em and flog ‘em brigade see violence as a deterrent as well as a suitable punishment – ‘they won’t do that again, will they?’. Despite all the evidence that little Johnny seems to do it all the more. Little Johnny doesn’t think he’s going to get caught again (because he’s crafty) and besides, there’s a lot of status to be gained from being caned. Deterrence doesn’t work.

If it did work then why are the same crew coming back for more week after week? Why were the schools full of such bullying and violence? Why did so many kids hate school?

You see this deterrence theory at work on the world stage. It’s probably why there are so many wars!

The ‘hard’ cane-wielding bullies of teachers ran their classrooms with rods of iron, destroying their subject in the process, turning young minds off and creating pent-up frustration. Further down the line that repression came out as bullying, fighting and disorder in other classrooms. The ‘tough’ teachers regarded the ‘weaker’ staff who did not terrify their kids with gratuitous threats and violence as the problem. If only all staff beat ‘discipline’ into their kids the school would be perfect. Except it wouldn’t, would it? It would resemble a concentration camp in which all enjoyment, fun, pleasure, relationship and joy of learning was drained out like water in a sieve. Education would become a chore to endure.

Not my idea of what a school should be. I prefer schools to be places of safety, warmth and vitality where students work with teachers with mutual enjoyment. That’s what a lot of my teaching life was like.

I watch the news where hateful draconian thugs are meting out ‘justice’ to unfortunate victims – usually women who have committed the terrible crime of not wearing a head scarf correctly. For this they must be publically humiliated and taught a lesson – a lesson that others need to take note of. They are taken to a busy square manhandled and beaten with cane. They might receive ten lashes or two hundred or a thousand.

When you watch it on TV it doesn’t look too much. You have to have been caned to know exactly how bad that could be. It could easily kill you.

My experience of violence began at home. A slap on the bare legs, an occasional sting across the legs with a cane kept at the side of the boiler. My parents weren’t heavily into violence. I probably deserved it and a lot more. It was a half-hearted affair. My sister and I hid the cane. My parents were only going along with the perceived wisdom. Corporal punishment was the done thing.

The next step in the chain was school. By all accounts I could be a lively lad. If you misbehaved you would be sent out of the classroom for a period of time- probably just five minutes. That was a time of terror. Our ogre of a Head teacher prowled. If she found you outside you knew she would hit you with a ruler. The fear was the worst part – well not quite. Depending on what you had done or her mood as to what happened. A few slaps with the face of the ruler over upturned hands stung a bit but wasn’t too bad. The face of the ruler over the back of the hands was worse, but the real killer was the edge of the ruler over the backs of the fingers.

I still remember standing outside the door in dread with every sense straining and the sense of relief if the door opened and I was beckoned back in.

The real brutality began in our secondary school. It started in week one.

The PE teacher was a British gymnast; a sturdy guy with muscles on his muscles. Wearing a singlet and joggers to show off his imposing physique he lined us eleven-year-old innocents up along a line in the sports hall. Behind him was a chair with a long whippy cane laid over it. He explained to us that this was his ‘chopper’ and ‘chopping block’. If we dared to step out of line we’d meet the two of them. That didn’t look like something we’d enjoy.

He then went on to describe what he would like us to do for our first PE lesson. It was quite straightforward. It did not require a lesson plan. We were to run around the outside of the courts marked out in the hall. He picked up his cane and slapped it into his hand menacingly. Anybody who stepped inside the lines would get a whack. The last one round would get a whack.

Basically he stood there whacking us as we ran around the hall for 30 minutes. He loved his job. By the end of the ‘lesson’ about half the class had blood dribbling down their legs. Job done.

In our school all the teachers could dish out punishments while the Headmaster dispensed formalised floggings. The prefects could deliver two swishes of the cane and gleefully dragged their victims under the school for summary kangaroo trials and punishment.

In lessons punishments ranged from having chalk and wooden blackboard rubbers thrown at you (I was knocked unconscious in one maths lesson), to being lifted out of your seat by an ear (excruciatingly painful) as well as the standard slipper and cane. At times school resembled a war zone.

I have a theory that a lot of this violence was caused by traumatised servicemen who had been fast-tracked into teaching on being demobbed after the war (apart from the obvious sadists and perverts who had gone into the profession for the pleasure of caning young boys (girls were not caned on their bums – that would have been too much!).

A formal caning was a brutal affair. You could choose to take your punishment ‘like a man’ and bend over to grip the sides of the desk or, if you rebelled against the punishment you were manhandled and held by either prefects or staff. The Headteacher retreated to the other end of his study and hurtled down at the victim with the cane raised high. He’s jump in the air and bring the cane down on the raised buttocks with as much force as he could muster. It made a loud thud and elicited a cry or at least an intake of breath as a searing pain scorched the brain.

The end result of this swipe was a physical reaction. Sometimes the skin would be split but more often than not you ended up with a welt – a raised livid red line; a hardened ridge, as if the outrage area of impact was tensing itself, gritting its teeth, straining every fibre and had turned to stone. The area around went bright red as blood flowed in a vain attempt to repair the damage. It throbbed like a metronomic volcanic eruption. It was agony to touch. This ridge would metamorphosis through many stages over the course of days. The hardened ridge melting into a deep purple bruise. The irate crimson streak would form a scab. Over weeks the deep purple would spread out and slowly progress through brown to a dissipating yellow like a melting funeral rainbow. With six of these bastards the whole of your arse formed a Jackson Pollock of pain.  The pain was so intense that the victim was excused sitting. You could stand for a day. Who said that the establishment was heartless, callous and cruel?

Mind you, the threat of caning could be used against them.

I remember on one occasion the whole thing rebounding horribly against the bastards.

Terry Bolton was troublesome. A big lad with presence. A fighter, a bully, a young man with attitude. I wouldn’t say he was a rebel because he had no cause. He was just an arrogant lump of teenage attitude. A bad lad. The girls went crazy for him. Caning was a regular event – the price to pay. Indeed it added to his whole charisma of being a hard dude.

The school authority had had enough. They decided to teach him a lesson. The whole school was summoned and we sat in the hall while a table and cane were deployed. Terry, who was in year 10 or 11, a strapping fifteen-year-old, was sitting towards the back. We all knew what was coming. He knew. Atmosphere was electric. Everyone was hanging on the cusp of expectation.

Terry was called up by the deputy as the Head stood flexing his weapon at the side of the stage. Nonchalantly Terry rose from the seated ranks. He strolled swaggering down the aisle to the place of execution with a defiant smile on his face. James Dean could not have produced a better performance.

Staff were poised in the wings as Terry was invited to bend over the table. What was he going to do? Would he meekly obey? Our eyes were no longer saucers they were dinner plates. Our mouths were open. What was going to happen?

Terry glanced around at us, grinned and outrageously winked. Theatrically he bent over the table, gripping the sides in the prescribed manner, making sure that he was facing us.

For a minute the tableau was set in stone.

The head launched himself, sprinting from the wings, sprang into the air and brought the cane down upon Terry’s raised buttocks with every ounce of power that he possessed. Our imaginations provided the explosion of pain. We were all watching Terry intently. THHHWWWAAAACKKK!! Not a flinch, not a flicker, no tightening of fingers, no change of expression, if anything a bored look of indifference. Let’s get this over.

THHHWWWAAAACKKK!! THHHWWWAAAACKKK!! THHHWWWAAAACKKK!! THHHWWWAAAACKKK!! THHHWWWAAAACKKK!!.

It was over. Terry slowly pulled himself up to his full height, smiled at the Head,(is that the best you’ve got?) slowly surveyed the hall and then casually swaggered back down the steps, sauntered down the aisle and very deliberately sat down.

We were in awe. They had successfully turned Terry into a magnificent hero!

When the ultimate deterrent ceases to be a threat what have you got left?

My views on Israel and Gaza.

Anne sent me this response to an article I published. I hope she doesn’t mind me putting it up here. I will address it after.

Hi Opher, I realised you were away, celebrating your birthday when I posted this reply to a piece on your blog. Now, presumably, it’s too long ago for you to have noticed it. I would appreciate a comment on it, from you, though.I wonder where you stand? I was confused when I read this That’s why I’ve taken so long to reply. I couldn’t be sure how much was ‘our extreme right wing friend’ and how much was you. As you know, I am very committed to the struggle of Palestinians. I do not believe ‘Israel’ has any right to defend itself. The UN should never have made it into a country. The UK set the whole thing in motion with the Balfour Declaration (although that did state that Palestinians should not be displaced, or lose their rights).. The UK gave up its mandate because of a terrorist campaign by Zionists, and abstained in the vote that gave ‘Israel’ statehood. Ever since ‘Israel’ declared independence, it has displaced, killed, raped, imprisoned and humiliated Palestinians. I would not object to Jews being in Palestine, but only as part of a state where everyone was free and equal. They are almost all immigrants, or descended from immigrants. Palestinuans have been there all the time. The claims written in that old book they call the Bible aren’t worth the paper they are written on. It was in response to the horrible treatment Palestinians have suffered since 1948 that October 7th happened. That doesn’t justify it, but it does explain it. I am sure it was supposed to be a hostage-taking exercise, not what it turned out to be. The question of how many Jews were killed, and by whom, is still open. Many of us believe ‘the Hannibal Directive’ cost many lives. There is also the question of why one of the most heavily guarded borders in the world was so easily breached. At the very least, the IDF had been told there was no real threat and they could relax. At the worst: who knows? Hamas had not held elections for many years. When they were elected, there was a bitter struggle with the Palestinian Authority, which led to a severing of political relations. However, Hamas was a functioning civil authority as well as a militant organisation. It ran hospitals, police, schools and all infrastructure. It did not need to be bombed out of existence. ‘Israel’ has shown that it can assassinate people without much collateral damage. They could have killed the military leaders without flattening the country. ‘Israel’ only needs to defend itself because it has stolen the land of the indigenous people. Before the Zionists came to power, and before the huge waves of immigration after WWII (much of them brought about by ‘Israel!’ appealing to Jews worldwide, who were not refugees, to come to build the country) Jews and Muslims got along fairly well in Palestine. What ‘Israel’ seems to be doing is using Hamas as an excuse for a shameless land-grab – part of the ‘Greater Israel Project’. In short, I believe that the only viable solution is a single state one, with all people having equal rights. That would need to be very firmly controlled by an international peacekeeping force. That’s a pipedream It almost certainly won’t happen, but I can’t see anything else working.

Enter

Anne
Anne Gregory

It was this piece you posted on 21st May. https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1Ajw83bYEE/

Here’s what I think:

a. Israel has no historical claim to the land.

b. Referring to ancient religious documents to justify taking land is absurd. It’s like Britain claiming the USA and Australia but even more ridiculous. Religion is a manmade fantasy to my mind. It can’t be used to justify anything. We might as well lay claim to France because of King Arthur and Merlin the wizard. The Old Testament is as much fairy tale in my view. It is no justification for stealing land. There is no legitimacy.

c. However, nearly all nations are built on conquest. Israel is no exception. They took the land by force and I believe that enough time has passed; they should be recognised as a sovereign country.

d. I believe the Palestinians, who owned the land, and have been displaced should now be properly compensated. I do not believe there will be an end to this conflict until that has been done.

e. I believe the Palestinians have been treated harshly, made into 2nd class citizens and have been subjected to racism. This long-term abuse is part of the problem.

f. I believe the war run by Hamas, with rockets and attacks on Israeli citizens is not the way to go. Hamas is a terrorist organisation and while I can understand the anger I cannot condone it.

g. I believe the attack by Hamas on on October 7th 2023 (from the accounts I have read) was barbaric and cannot be justified. Hamas should immediately return all hostages. Whether there was Israeli collusion (In order to justify the destruction of Gaza) is open to investigation. What Hamas did in killing, raping and torturing was disgusting.

h. I believe Israel has justification in going for Hamas.

I. I do not believe they are justified in going for hospitals, schools, refugee camps or civilian areas. These are war crimes.

J. I believe that deliberately withholding food, water and medicine as weapons of war against civilians is barbaric, definite war crimes and amounts to genocide.

K. I believe Netanyahu and his extreme cabinet are war criminals and their actions are fascist to the extreme. They should be tried for their crimes. They put all Palestinians in the same category (as terrorist Hamas supporters) and that justifies killing them all in their eyes.

L. I believe in a negotiated two nation solution with land and reparation given to the Palestinian people. The alternative – a single-nation state, based on complete equality, is nigh-on impossible given the level of hatred on both sides.

M. I believe violence on both sides is wrong. Negotiation and reparation are the only way forward.

N. I believe Trump has made things worse by empowering Netanyahu to do as he pleases. Netanyahu is being used by extreme religious groups and has to keep going at war to hold his fascist coalition together and keep himself out of court.

O. I believe the UN needs to step in.

P. I believe that violence perpetuates more violence; death generates hate and we are locked in a cycle of revenge.

The Wisdom of Mankind

The Wisdom of Mankind

Bombing hospitals

                Bombing schools

Blowing little children

                To glutinous pools.

That’s what research

                Is aiming for

                                All Man’s ingenuity –

                                                The wiles of war.

Opher – 18.4.2025

Isn’t it incredibly sad that we use science, technology and all our creativity in this way?

All over the world, in secret labs, our cleverest people are paid to devise ever nastier ways of killing other people.

All those dollars spent on death.

At this minute politicians are plotting who to attack, Generals are identifying targets. Schools, hospitals, residential blocks, clinics and electricity stations are targeted. Children and women are fair game.

Destroy resolve; destroy spirits.

It’s evil.

Just imagine if all that money could be used to deal with poverty, inequality and the creation of a less polluted world.

Just imagine if we used our greatest minds to find solutions to all our problems.

What a world we would live in.

Instead….

America Too Dangerous to Visit!

I’ve been to most places around the world, including some danger zones – Egypt, Jordan, Oman and Israel. I’ve been to South Africa and Brazil. I’ve even travelled to the Iraq border and right through Mexico, through Zambia and Zimbabwe. The only place I’ve had a gun pulled on me is in the USA. That was before all this MAGA hate and the rise and empowerment of these gun-totin’ fascists.

When I lived there these racist extremists were a minority who were ridiculed and kept their heads down. Trump has empowered them. Now every slime-ball and moron with a gun has crawled out from under their rock with the view that they know better than everyone else and have a right to force their moronic views on everyone else!

The USA has become too dangerous to travel to. It’s like a third world country now. The education system is broken. It exports ignorance and superstition. The US is now a pit of conspiracy, arrogance and stupidity. America seems to breed racism, white supremacy and Nazis. Half of them still believe they are living in the frontier Wild West. This complete stupidity about the right to bear arms is insane. Every nincompoop, racist motherfucker with a chip on their shoulder, a psychological disease or emotional turmoil is armed with assault rifles! It’s nuts! Then there are the gangs, the religious nutcases and political extremists. The place has always been a hotbed of macho violence with dollops of race hatred and religious extremism but it’s taken a big step further into the maelstrom of lawlessness. They spout freedom but they mean conformity. Not only can’t you trust the police but you can’t trust the corrupt politicians or the courts. The only thing that is expanding are the prisons.

How do intelligent, educated, sane Americans manage to live there? The place is an insane asylum run by escapees from drop-outs-ville. The people setting the pace may be stupid and completely uneducated but that doesn’t stop them thinking that they know better than any expert in any field. Science has become a dirty word!

Into what was already a heady mix of insanity comes Trump and the MAGA movement. He has cynically assembled a confederation of racists, Nazis, white supremacists, conspiracy believers, extreme right-wing Christians, trailer trash and discarded working class into a fanatical cult, undermined all experts, science, the media, law, courts, government, education and all other institutions to create a furore. The only truth is MAGA and Trump. And Trump lies and makes everything up. What he is good at is undermining stability and rational sense, stilling up division and hate, and convincing the stupid that he has the answers to every problem. To do that he scapegoats, belittles and inflames.

Now the MAGA nutcases are flouncing around brandishing machine guns and threatening anyone who doesn’t agree with them. It’s mob rule! This is precisely like the blackshirts of Nazi Germany! The MAGA caps are the new SS symbol.

I love America! The most beautiful countryside in the world!

I love the sane American people! (at least the sane, educated ones)

I despise Trump and MAGA, the ascendency of stupid and the rule of violence.

Until the States have become civilised again I won’t be going back! It’s too dangerous! I might go to Afghanistan or Libya, Sudan or Yemen instead! They’re safer!

The Nazification of the USA

Sowing the Seeds!!