Which is the worst religion??

Posted on by Opher

On what basis can you judge a religion?

a. Does it create fear and trauma by threatening people with horrendous ends if they don’t believe? (Hell, brimstone, torture, being outcast)

b. Does it promise ridiculous rewards for believing? (everlasting bliss, 24 virgins, food and drink)

c. Does it require very strict dress codes- particularly for women? (Veils, robes, burqas)

d. Does it insist on draconian rituals – prayers, fasts, attendance, supplication?

e. Does it discriminate against women – separating them into second-class roles or as chattels?

f. Does it advocate violence against people who believe differently?

g. Does it have strict blasphemy laws?

h. Are there severe punishments for disobeying rituals, dress codes, blasphemy or leaving the cult?

i. Do the hierarchy receive privilege and dispensation? Who profits the prophet?

j. Do they use the psychological threat of the fear of death?

k. Just it involve psychological coercion?

A bad religion sets out to hook its victims young and coerce them with fear then trap them in a cycle of ritual. They provide comfort against the fear they have induced. They create a tribal togetherness against the common enemy – everybody else. They hold forth a glorious future – world domination and eternal life.

In my opinion all religions have a series of rather daft creation stories and claims; all were created for political/social reasons; (the Abrahamic religions all stem from tribal Arabic culture with inbuilt misogyny); all suppress science and progress; all are totally intolerant and repressive; all ban and burn books; all slaughter and torture heretics; all indoctrinate children; all set up an elite who are the source of all knowledge and live a privileged life; all go to war and sanction wars. Of course, there are sects like the Quakers, who are opposed to some or all of the above.

Then we have the supportive, positive, mental affirming aspects of religion and the good they do in the community and for the mental health of individuals as a counter measure. All religions do some good. But I contend that the evil they do outweighs the good by a considerable amount.

There are a number of contenders:

Christianity with its witch burning, tortures, public burnings of Catholics, inquisitions, book burnings, indoctrination of children, evangelical patronising of other cultures, bloody massacres, sacking of cities, wars, pogroms and crusades. Intolerance and fear. Hate and stultifying ritual.

Islam with its inbuilt misogyny, beheadings, strict heresy laws, ban on music, destruction of historic sites and removal of art, stonings, mass torture, terrorist bombings, jihads, repression, indoctrination of children, intolerance and violence.

Judaism with its tribal intolerance, violence born of feeling victimised, closed community, indoctrination of children and claustrophobic adherence to ancient script. It kills progress and traps its victims.

Hinduism with its violence towards Muslims and strict rules, its rituals, indoctrination of children and crazy dietary regime.

If I had to choose a religion I think it would be a much more tolerant, less indoctrinated, less misogynistic and more questioning, open religion – maybe Buddhism, Quakerism or some kind of worship of sun and nature. I would acknowledge that all religions bring some degree of comfort, support, security and help that human beings seem to need. I would just contend that the harm they do far exceeds the good.

Fortunately I was never indoctrinated as a kid and I can see these monolithic power structures for what they are. Organised religions are hierarchical power structures. Those at the top do very nicely. The worshippers are easily conned. Culture sucks people in because belief and ritual are the done thing. It’s hard to go against something everybody else seems to believe in. Human minds are frail. We seem to need the comfort of ritual, ceremony and belief in a higher force. We are weak. We cannot cope with death and fall back on promises. We search for answers to big questions and fall for simplistic explanations. I don’t. I still question and see through the simplistic answers and indoctrination.

All the religions above have had their periods of extreme nastiness. If I was choosing the worst religion I would be hard put.

In the past I think it was probably Christianity. It’s violence, torture, misogyny and vindictiveness was unparalleled. But the enlightenment curbed its power and softened its violence. Islam, with its present culture of hatred, revenge and violence, it’s wish for expansion and world domination, has superseded Christianity as the most deplorable.

What are your views?

1,168 thoughts on “Which is the worst religion??”

  1. I think rather than specific religions it depends on human nature. For example, Quakers are still Christian but lean towards peace and kindness. On the other hand, many Christians have used religion as an excuse to commit violence and crimes against humanity.

    Reply

    1. I think certain religions mould people with their doctrine and indoctrination. They are inherently intolerant, misogynistic and violent.

      Reply

  2. While studying Soviet foreign policy under Prof. Dunning at Texas A&M, I developed a theory of Trotsky’s “Permanent Revolution” as a mechanism for dismantling the ethical containment force of a civilization. This theory helped explain why Stalin, in 1939, invited Hitler to attack the USSR, enabling the Nazi military to mass troops along Soviet borders without triggering a Soviet mobilization. Stalin, fearing the precedent of WWI—where a prolonged war catalyzed the collapse of the Czarist regime—believed such a shock invasion could be politically survivable if it avoided prolonged internal dissent.

    The Bolsheviks based their theory of revolution upon the French revolution where the King and the Church destroyed. The Bolsheviks destroyed both the Czar and the Greek Orthodox Church. The collapse of the Shah of Iran witnessed the overthrow of both the Shah and Western culture. Hitler did the same in Germany, he destroyed the post WWI Parliament and the Church.

    Vladimir Lenin’s approach to revolution built around a tight knit and concealed cabal of revolutionaries. This idea separated from the Menshevik theories which embraced anarchist theories of revolution. Lenin rejected the anarchist and decentralist leanings of the Mensheviks, establishing a covert revolutionary elite to seize power. Trotsky, by contrast, remained more loyal to the original soviet model: workers’ councils governing through direct delegation. Lenin Marxist ideology emphasized the role of the proletariat in overthrowing capitalism and establishing a dictatorship of the proletariat. Whereas Troskii, being at heart a Menshevik supported “All Power to the Soviets” way to achieve political power and rule of government – at least till he sat as the Head of State. Lenin and Troskii used specific strategies, such as forming alliances with other revolutionary groups and leveraging the discontent of soldiers and workers, to successfully overthrow the Provisional Government. Stalin would employ intra-Bolshevik alliances to expel Troskii as the heir of Lenin.

    The simplistic narrative of the Gospels – a story of Santa Claus coming to town lies told to children. Religious belief systems, no different than Stalin’s and Hitler’s propaganda lies told to their Party “believers”. The church persecution of “Xtian heretics” — no different than Stalin’s show trials of Bolshevik leaders whose opinions threatened the stability of Stalin’s One Man dictatorship.

    Or Hitler’s, the “Night of the Long Knives,” purge which executed several leaders of the Sturmabteilung (SA), also known as the Brown Shirts, as well as other political adversaries. The SA, led by Ernst Röhm, instrumental in Hitler’s rise to power, but by 1934, their increasing power and Röhm’s ambitions posed a threat to Hitler and the more conservative elements of the Nazi Party, including the military (Reichswehr) and the SS (Schutzstaffel).

    Hitler used a purge to consolidate his power, eliminate rivals, and gain the support of the military, which viewed the SA as a potential threat. The event resulted in the deaths of many SA leaders and other political opponents, solidifying Hitler’s control over the Nazi Party and the German state. The Night of the Long Knives, often seen as a turning point in the establishment of Hitler’s dictatorship.

    During the Middle Ages the Pope instituted similar purges of all heretic gnostic and Protestant believers which challenged the dominance of the church monopoly over how to understand and interpret the NT\gospels. For example all church leaders have denounced to this very day the revelation of the Oral Torah as explained through the kabbalah of rabbi Akiva’s four part פרדס logic format.

    Peter Lombard (c. 1100-1160), a significant figure in medieval theology, best known for his work “Sentences” (Sententiae), which became a cornerstone of Scholastic thought. His “Sentences” – a compilation of theological opinions and teachings from earlier Church Fathers and theologians, structured in a way that facilitated debate and discussion among scholars. The “Sentences” addressed various topics, including the nature of God, the sacraments, and the virtues. It provided a systematic approach to theology that encouraged critical thinking and analysis.

    Gratian, who lived around 1140, a prominent medieval scholar and jurist, best known for his work in canon law. He often referred to by many catholics as the “Father of Canon Law”, due to his significant contributions to the development of ecclesiastical legal systems in the Catholic church. His most notable work – the “Decretum Gratiani.” A comprehensive compilation of canon law that organized and harmonized the various legal texts and decrees which accumulated over the years. This work, pivotal in establishing a systematic approach to canon law and served as a foundational text for later legal scholars and the development of church law.

    Gratian’s “Decretum” addressed various topics, including the authority of the church, the nature of sin, and the administration of sacraments. Gratian’s ‘Decretum’ shaped the Church’s legal framework and remained a foundational text in canon law and theology for centuries. His work laid the groundwork for subsequent developments in both canon law and civil law.

    Saint Albert the Great, another significant figure in the development of medieval philosophy and science. Albertus Magnus, a mentor to Thomas Aquinas at the University of Paris. His influence on Aquinas helped shape the latter’s integration of Aristotelian philosophy with Xtian theology. He played a crucial role in reintroducing Aristotelian philosophy to the Xtian intellectual tradition.

    Albertus sought to reconcile Aristotle’s ideas with Xtian doctrine, emphasizing the compatibility of faith and reason. Often regarded as one of the first to systematically study the natural world. His integration of Aristotelian philosophy with Xtian theology influenced not only his students, like Aquinas, but also the broader development of Western philosophy and science. His work in biology, mineralogy, and metaphysics, all of which were deeply empirical for the time viewed as a bridge between the ancient philosophy and the rediscovered ancient Greek logic philosophies in the 10th Century.

    Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274): Perhaps the most famous Scholastic philosopher and theologian, Aquinas – best known for his works “Summa Theologica” and “Summa Contra Gentiles.” He sought to reconcile faith and reason, drawing heavily on Aristotelian philosophy.

    This is Aquinas’s most famous work, structured as a comprehensive guide to theology. It addresses various theological questions, including the existence of God, the nature of man, and moral principles. The work is notable for its systematic approach and use of Aristotelian logic.

    Summa Contra Gentiles, Aquinas defends the Xtian faith against non-Xtian philosophies, particularly those of Islam and Judaism. It emphasizes the rational basis of faith and aims to demonstrate the compatibility of reason and revelation. Its failure to address the 4 part inductive reasoning logic of Oral Torah ultimately proves the propaganda half truths of church theology.

    Aquinas, by stark contrast drew heavily on the works of Aristotle rather than rabbi Akiva. The latter views the Talmud compared to the warp/weft threads of a loom. Where דרוש ופשט interpret T’NaCH prophetic mussar and interpret the kvanna of Aggadic stories. While רמז וסוד conceal as the foundation of time oriented commandments express through both Torah commandments and Talmudic halachot. Aquinas consciously chose and integrated Aristotelian philosophy within the fabric of Xtian doctrine. He introduced concepts such as the “Five Ways” to demonstrate the existence of God, arguments based on observation and reason based upon Greek philosophy. And the Xtian Muslim dogma of Universal monotheism.

    Aristotle’s static logic, ideal for constructing bridges. Hence Aquinas prioritized ancient Greek logic as ideal to support catholic dogmatism and Papal Bulls. Fluid\dynamic inductive reasoning/law where opposing prosecutor and defense lawyers rely exclusively upon previous judicial precedents to support pro & con opinions, hardly served the interests of a Vatican bible dictatorship. All three—Church, Stalin, Hitler—feared epistemological rivals: alternative systems of truth and authority. Like Stalinist “confessions” under torture, medieval inquisitions produced fabricated heresies to maintain a monopoly over “truth.”

    Aquinas, known for his development of the concept of ancient Greek ‘natural law’. Which posits that moral principles best understood through human reason and inherent in the nature of human beings. His method involved posing Socratic-Plato questions, presenting objections, and then providing answers, which became a hallmark of Scholastic methodology.

    Suppression of heretical beliefs and movements that challenged Vatican authority and interpretation of Xtian substitute theology doctrine included church denial of the Oral Torah revelation at Horev. Rabbi Akiva’s 4 part inductive logic system “replaced” by Aristotle’s 3 part syllogism of deductive logic. The latter shaped the church narrative. Logos (Greek abstraction) vs. Dibur or Torah SheB’al Peh (Oath alliance active remembrance of the oaths sworn by Avraham Yitzak and Yaacov.), which the church fathers violently denounce. In 1242 the Pope ordered the public burning of all Talmudic manuscripts within the whole of France.

    The church defined heresy as beliefs or practices that deviated from established doctrine dogma and Vatican Bulls. Groups such as the Cathars and Waldensians, and of course Jews, labeled as cursed heretics for their stubborn stiff-necked alternative interpretations of Xtianity; Jews who viewed the NT as a Roman fraud, utterly despised by being impoverished through taxation without representation and thrown into ghetto gulags for multiple Centuries – פרדס inductive reasoning, compares to mentioning aloud the name of Lord Voldemort.

    Established in the 12th century, the Inquisition formalized systematic oppression into a Nazi-like system – wherein the catholic thought police identified, prosecuted and slaughtered “heretics”. It involved pre-decided judicial investigations, trials, employed to conceal satanic human torture. The most infamous of these the notorious war-crimes: Spanish Inquisition. Begun in 1478, targeting Jews, Muslims, and Protestant reformers.

    Suppression of heretical beliefs and movements that challenged Vatican authority and interpretation of Xtian doctrine, specifically included church denial of the Oral Torah revelation at Horev. Which also laid the foundation for Stalin’s later show trials in the 1930s.

    Rabbi Akiva’s 4 part inductive logic system, Xtian replacement theology” prioritized and emphasized both Paul’s ‘original sin’ theology and later Aristotle’s 3 part syllogism of deductive logic, and denounced Jewish Oral Torah as non existent. This proverbial ostrich burying head in sand cowardice, such tuma pusillanimity shapes the church narratives to this very day.

    The church classically defined heresy, prior to the French Revolution, as beliefs or practices that deviated and challenged the church dictate. Groups such as the Cathars and Waldensians, labeled as heretics for their alternative interpretations of both bible & Xtianity. Many groups other than these specific particulars utterly rejected the church Vatican monopoly – authority and power – to solely interpret the intent of both bible and church dogma. The Inquisition prosecution of heretics involved quasi-investigations, trials, and often torture punishments, resulting in execution.

    The Gospel of John, written in Greek. The earliest known manuscripts of the Gospel of john include fragments such as the Rylands Library Papyrus P52, which dates to around 125 CE. This fragment, the oldest known manuscript of any part of the New Testament and contains a few verses from John 18. Other significant manuscripts, like Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanus, date from the 4th century CE and include the entire text of the Gospel.

    The early Church Fathers, who were primarily Greek and Latin speakers, recognized the Greek text as the authoritative version. They often cited it in their writings, which supports the Rylands Library Papyrus P52, and contributes to the perception that the john gospel was originally composed in Greek. During this period of the Roman empire Greek served as the lingua franca – the medium of communication between peoples of different languages.

    The Hellenistic themes of pre-existent divinity and hypostatic union present significant theological challenges when compared to the foundational principles of revelation as outlined in the Torah, particularly the events at Sinai. Pre-Existent Divinity, this concept suggests that certain divine beings or aspects of divinity existed before the creation of the world. In Hellenistic thought, this often refers to the idea of a divine Logos or intermediary that existed alongside God before the creation of the universe. In Xtian theology, this Greek concept, reflected in the belief in the pre-existence of Christ, seen as the divine Word (Logos) that was with God and was God (John 1:1).

    While some early Church Fathers, like Papias, mentioned a possible ‘Hebrew Gospel’, they did not specifically attribute this to john. The notion of a Hebrew Gospel has been discussed in the context of the early Christian community’s use of different languages and texts. However, there no manuscript exists that definitively supports this revisionist history narrative. Most of the early references to such texts, compare to church blood libel slanders – indirect and often speculative. The lack of concrete manuscript evidence has led many scholars to view the idea of a Hebrew Gospel of John as most base revisionist history. The Greek Gospel of John, with no reliable Hebrew precedent, confirms the Roman-Hellenistic theological trajectory—not an indigenous Semitic prophecy.

    The absence of a Hebrew manuscript or even substantial references to it in early Christian writings further proves this as just another blood libel lie. The theological themes in the Gospel of John, such as the Logos (Word) and the divinity of Christ, align more closely with Hellenistic thought than Hebrew thought which totally repudiate it. Attempts by Xtians in this Century to declare that Logos means “ben” or “JeZeus” amounts to creating their own ‘Oral Torah way’ to interpret the NT, while denying the existence of the revelation of the Oral Torah at Horev.

    The church’s persecution of heresy did not merely target political dissent—it waged wars against competing systems of legal and judicial reasoning vs. legislative statute law dictates made by tyrants or non elected bureaucrats. The Jewish Oral Torah, whose revelatory authority at Horev, rooted in inductive logic and oaths precedent active remembrance of the Avot; this judicial common law fundamentally threatened the Vatican’s imposed monopoly over its Pravda – truth. Replacing Rabbi Akiva’s פרדס framework with Aristotle’s deductive syllogism, the Church attempted to implode T’NaCH and Talmudic common law judicial legalism. That actively shapes and influences the cultures and customs which defines Jewish identity as a people of the chosen Cohen nation.

    The battle over heresy, never merely about doctrine—rather, a battle over interpretive sovereignty. The church’s erasure of the Oral Torah, its violent rejection of the פרדס legal judicial legislative review, and its dogmatic substitution of Greek metaphysics, all point to a broader imperial strategy: the silencing of Sinai. Just as Stalin erased rivals and Hitler purged the SA, the Vatican constructed a theological police state—burning the Talmud, ghettoizing Jews, and replacing the oath alliance conscious remembrance of the Avot through the tefillah from the Torah kre’a shma, the church intentionally sought to implode Horev replaced by the empire of Rome. That war on revelation still echoes in every attempt to retranslate the Gospel into Hebrew, to resurrect ‘Logos’ as ‘Ben,’ and to pass fiction as prophecy.”

    The Torah commandment to uproot Canaanite cultures reflects not cruelty but covenantal mercy (מידת רחום)—a national immunization against cultural apostasy and idolatry. The second commandment warns against assimilating into societies that reject the Horev revelation, whether ancient Canaanites or modern ideological empires like Rome and Mecca. Failure to uproot the ancient Canaanites directly threatened the 2nd Sinai commandment not to follow the cultures and customs of peoples who reject the revelation of the Torah at Sinai and Horev. The peoples of both Xtianity and Islam reject the revelation of the Torah at Sinai and Horev. Hence the church sought to implode and cause the People of Israel to forget the Oral Torah just as did the assimilated Tzeddukim who sought to transform Jerusalem into a Greek polis.

    Reply

      3. The pursuit of justice has nothing to do with religious doctrine and everything to do with judicial common law courtrooms.

      4. Wrong. Religions all try to permeate the state as well as all power structures. The try to determine laws and control people. They try to set up indoctrination programs in schools and other ‘education’ institutes. Religion is all about control!

      5. Dumb ass. Torah did not get the interpretation of a religion until g’lut Jewry during the Dark and Middle Ages of exile. Torah a political Constitutional document, much like the current Constitution of the United States. Duh. Idiot.

      7. Faggot your stuck in your closet.

        The Vulgate and Lutheran Bible translations so disgusting – eat shit and die – “translations”. What a pathetic joke. Werewolves, Vampires, and Frankenstein … follow with the cowardly lion, down the Yellow Brick Road – Oh my! Following Cults of Personality only produce Mao, Stalin, Hitler and Pol Pot like – dumbasses.

        John Calvin and Martin Luther, pivotal figures in the Protestant Reformation, each contributing significantly to the movement in distinct ways. Martin Luther (1483-1546), best known for his “95 Theses,” which he famously nailed to the door of the Wittenberg Castle Church in 1517. This document criticized the Catholic Church’s practices, particularly the sale of indulgences, and called for reform.

        His theology emphasized the doctrine of justification by faith alone, arguing that salvation is a gift from God and cannot be earned through good works or church rituals. Asserting that salvation is a gift from God, this theology day and night different from Torah common law as expressed through T’NaCH prophetic mussar common law and Talmudic halachic judicial common law. This prioritization of faith as the pursuit of judicial justice – fair compensation of damages inflicted by Jews upon other Jews, radically different from the theologies spewed forth by the Protestant Reformation.

        Luther made an utterly sophomoric translation the Bible into German, which utterly failed and even compounded the Vulgate perversion of the T’NaCH. Luther’s translation became “The Word” for the ignorant Lutheran laity. He promoted the idea that individuals could interpret scripture without knowledge of Hebrew or Aramaic and despised the Roman clergy who relied upon Latin and Greek. Luther’s ideas established Lutheranism, and challenged the authority of the Pope and the Catholic Church, leading to the formation of various Protestant denominations.

        John Calvin (1509-1564), Calvin built upon Luther’s ideas but introduced a more systematic theology. His work, “Institutes of the Christian Religion,” laid out his beliefs about predestination, the sovereignty of God, and the nature of the church. He established Geneva as a center of Protestantism, implementing a theocratic government that enforced moral discipline and promoted education and social welfare. Calvin’s teachings led to the development of Reformed theology, influencing various Protestant groups, including the Presbyterians and the Huguenots. He stressed the importance of a disciplined Christian community and the role of the church in guiding believers’ lives.

        The St. Bartholomew’s Day Massacre in 1572; the Huguenots were French Protestants influenced by John Calvin’s teachings. Tensions between the Catholic majority and the Protestant minority led to a series of civil wars known as the French Wars of Religion. The St. Bartholomew’s Day Massacre was a turning point, where thousands of Huguenots were killed in Paris and across France, marking a significant moment of barbaric religious violence. This period was characterized by political intrigue, shifting alliances, and brutal conflicts, ultimately leading to the Edict of Nantes in 1598, which granted limited religious freedoms to the Huguenots. However, this tolerance was revoked in 1685, leading to further persecution and the exodus of many Huguenots from France.

        The immediate trigger for the Thirty Years’ War came in 1618 with the Defenestration of Prague, where Protestant nobles in Bohemia revolted against the Catholic Habsburg rule. This event marked the beginning of the war, but the underlying tensions had been building since the formation of the Catholic League and Protestant Union. The events of 1609, particularly the formation of the Catholic League under Maximilian of Bavaria, were crucial in setting the stage for the Thirty Years’ War. The conflict would evolve into a complex struggle involving various European powers, driven by both religious and political motivations, leading to widespread devastation across the continent.

        The Protestant Union, established in 1608, was indeed led by Frederick IV, the Elector Palatine, and aimed to protect the rights and interests of Protestant states against Catholic encroachments. This was a response to the increasing tensions and conflicts arising from the Reformation and the subsequent political landscape in Europe.

        In reaction to the Protestant Union, the Catholic League was formed in 1609, primarily to counter the influence of Protestant states and to protect Catholic interests. This military alliance included several Catholic states and was a significant factor in the lead-up to the Thirty Years’ War, which began in 1618. These alliances were crucial in shaping the religious and political dynamics of the time, leading to significant conflicts and changes in power within the Holy Roman Empire and beyond.

        The Peace of Westphalia in 1648, which ended the Thirty Years’ War, was primarily focused on resolving the conflicts arising from that war rather than directly addressing the earlier events of the St. Bartholomew’s Day Massacre. The Peace of Westphalia consisted of a series of treaties that concluded the Thirty Years’ War (1618-1648) and the Eighty Years’ War (1568-1648) between Spain and the Dutch Republic. It marked a significant turning point in European history, establishing a new order based on state sovereignty.

        The Peace of Westphalia and the ensuing treaties recognized the coexistence of Catholicism, Lutheranism, and Calvinism within the Holy Roman Empire. This was a crucial step towards religious tolerance, as it aimed to stabilize the region by allowing various Christian denominations to coexist. The treaties recognized the coexistence of Catholicism, Lutheranism, and Calvinism within the Holy Roman Empire. France gained territories in Alsace and parts of Lorraine, while Sweden gained influence in northern Germany.

        While the Peace of Westphalia did not directly address the St. Bartholomew’s Day Massacre, it did contribute to a broader context of religious tolerance and the recognition of Protestant rights in Europe. The massacre had already highlighted the violent tensions between Catholics and Protestants in France, leading to a long period of civil strife. The St. Bartholomew’s Day Massacre (1572) deepened the divide between Catholics and Protestants in France, leading to further civil wars and conflicts. It exemplified the extreme violence and intolerance that characterized the period.

        In the same year as the ‘Peace of Westphalia’ (1648), witnessed the barbaric explosion of the Khmelnytsky Uprising, also known as the Cossack-Polish War. Bohdan Khmelnytsky was the leader (1648-57) of the Zaporozhian Cossacks who organized a rebellion against Polish rule in Ukraine that ultimately led to the transfer of the Ukrainian lands east of the Dnieper River from Polish to Russian control. His barbarian Cossack hordes slaughtered perhaps 1 million Jews living in the Ukraine and Poland.

        Germany annexed Prussia from Poland during the partitions of Poland, which occurred in three stages. (1772) – Prussia gained the region of West Prussia, which included parts of Polish territory. (1793) – Prussia acquired additional territories, including parts of Greater Poland. (1795) – Prussia annexed the remaining parts of Poland, including areas that would later be known as Prussian Poland.

        After World War II, the Allies did not restore Poland to its pre-partition borders; instead, they established new borders based on the outcomes of the war and the decisions made at conferences among the Allied powers. Poland lost significant territory in the east to the Soviet Union, including areas such as Lviv (Lwów) and parts of what is now western Ukraine and Belarus. In compensation, Poland was granted territory in the west, including parts of former German territories such as Silesia, Pomerania, and the southern part of East Prussia. Poland was re-established as a sovereign state after the war, but its borders were significantly different from those before the partitions in the late 18th century.

        Goyim superficially read “their” bible abominations of Av tumah avoda zarah. But continuously, from generation to generation, and Age from Age, they fail to learn and apply the rebuke given to them by their own God! JeZeus said: “By their fruits, you shall know them”. Reactionary Xtians read their bible trash translations oblivious to this fundamental rebuke. Its not the Nicene Creed theologies etc or Luther or Calvin theologies that determine their faith, rather its their barbaric Yatzir Ha’Rah to pursue violence and judicial injustice which testifies to the bankrupsy of every Xtian theology starting with that of Paul and JeZeus. Xtian Av tuma avoda zara just as crude and utterly devoid of humanity as the ancient Babylonian, and Greek and Roman empires which this NT theology replace those cultures and customs practiced by peoples from earlier times.

        Bottom line … no belief in JeZeus in any theology, creed, or dogma can atone for the Shoah and the generational crimes which led up to the Shoah. Belief in JeZeus, regardless of Xtian or Koran theologies decrees those believers an eternal fire in Hell. Xtian parents should cast their bible abominations to the flame of Hell before permitting this Av tuma avoda zarah to infect the souls of their children.

      8. All religions have their horror stories. That’s the nature of all religion – an exclusive power structure based on fear, hatred and ridiculous promises. Violence and dehumanisation is the outcome!

      10. Constitution – thousands killed by fire arms, nutcases rampaging in schools, all because or archaic constitution and right to buy assault rifles. The right to hate speech and conspiracy.

      13. Shaking the head after taking a piss.

        Nick
        The Bible Through the Seasons

        Nick·biblethroughseasons.com … From the Belly

        Listen to Pastor Nick read the Firestarter and Jonah 1. God’s heart is warm and tender to Nineveh—Jonah’s is not. God singles out for salvation, this pagan capital of the …
        _____________________________________________

        טיפש פשט
        Literally ‘you silly bird brained’ dumb ass literalist Pastor Nick. Torah commands mussar. Mussar instructs through the משל\נמשל method. What’s the interpretation – think Yosef interpreting the dreams of Par’o – of the whale? Answer: G’lut/exile. Hence when Yonah escaped from the belly of the whale, a direct comparison to the liberation of Israel from Egyptian bondage. Mussar aint Rocket Science. The Creation stories found in the first Book of בראשית, serves as the model how to understand the משל\נמשל mussar teaching approach and instruction!

        ב’ ראשית, ברית אש, ראש בית Words within Words רמזים/hints to how to interpret and understand Av Torah tohor time-oriented commandments like circumcision, fruitful and multiply, and the negative commandment against eating the Achilles tendon. The common denominator which joins these specific commandments with the mitzva of tefillah … all tohor time-oriented Av Torah commandments! משל – this 1st Book of the Torah introduces the Avot Avraham Yitzak and Yaacov. נמשל – this 1st Book of the Torah instructs the mussar of tohor time-oriented commandments which all Universally require prophetic mussar as the k’vanna of the Yatziir Ha’Tov within the heart!

        Av tohor time-oriented commandments absolutely require prophetic mussar as its k’vanna. The Torah defines the key term “prophet” as any person who commands prophetic mussar as the k’vanna of obeying all Torah and Talmudic commandments and halachot! Hence the Talmud serves as the codification of all tohor time oriented commandments from the Torah itself. Tohor time-oriented commandments not limited to time just like the Creation of the Chosen Cohen Nation not limited to racial theories of tumah spirits or DNA. No Av tuma avoda zarah replacement theology can substitute JeZeus for the descendant inheritors of the oath brit alliance which the Avot swore an oath brit with HaShem, the local tribal God of Sinai. Not the Universal God of Xtian and Islamic monotheism theologies and creed belief systems.

        The JeZeus/Hercules virgin birth mythology does not replace the children of Israel blessed by both Yaacov and Moshe as the Chosen Cohen people. The JeZeus myth which declared that some Zeus Father God dwells in the Heavens — utterly false when the Talmud prophetic mussar instructs the k’vanna of תפילה את רוחות שנשם בתוך הלבב. A simple טיפש פשט translation: Tefillah … a matter of the heart. The JeZeus mythical Hercules counterfeit taught that Father God dwells in the Heavens.

        Another example of tohor Av Torah time-oriented commandments that the false messiah Roman counterfeit did not know, the oral Torah mitzva of Moshiach dedicates the generations of Israel who pursue this mitzva, like shabbat, to pursue justice among our people as defined through the repeated mussar rebuke the prophet Shmuel gave to the House of David. The injustice shown to the slaughtered husband of Bat Sheva! Simply impossible to interpret the k’vanna of this Oral Torah time-oriented mitzva of Moshiach without the necessity of פרט-כלל or כלל-פרט, just like the Torah organizes רחום וחנון whereas the later prophets organize these to tohor middot in the order of חנון ורחום.

        Order servers as the יסוד upon which stands כלל the Siddur and פרט the kre’a shma, shemone esrei, kadish, tachanun, the order of the סמוכים Pesukei D’Zimra blessing. The Order of the blessings which surround the kre’a shma tefillah from the Torah. Order separates saying a blessing as opposed and contrasted by saying Tehillem praises. Understanding requires the skill that discerns and distinguishes ‘like’ from ‘like’. Just as keeping the mitzva of shabbat require making the required הבדלה which separates forbidden Melacha-work from forbidden Avodah-‘work’. Something like its permitted to sqeeze a lemon on sugar and then make tea but a negative Torah commandment not to sqeeze lemon juice directly into a glass of tea on Shabbat.

        Just as t’rumah separates the Torah commandment to dedicate a sacred portion given to the sons of Aaron from the chol grains from which the t’rumah – taken in the first place. To do tohor time-oriented commandments requires having a matter of the heart Yatzir Ha’Tov spirit of tohor middot prophetic mussar. Impossible to dedicate holy to HaShem ie לשמה tohor middot while lacking the essential understanding which possesses the skills required which discerns between like from like. No ”understanding”, No ”k’vanna”. No ”k’vanna”, No tohor time-oriented Av Torah commandments. Just that simple. An no JeZeus substitute theology Golden Calf, can turn a pigs’ ear into a silk purse, despite the empty fart like mythology that JeZeus turned water into wine.

      15. The Consistency Policy

        Rabbi Michael Glass There is a recorded discussion between the great rabbis of the mishnaic era in which different opinions were offered as to which verse of the Torah was the most fundamental. The first verse suggested was “Shemah Yisroel…”, a crucial verse which affirms our acceptance of the Almighty’s rule. The next opinion suggested the verse which announces the commandment to love one’s neighbour as one loves oneself, which is also understandably a very fundamental tenet in Jewish thought. However the final suggestion, which was declared the winner, was a verse contained within this week’s portion, the parsha of Pinchas. The victor was the verse which requires the priests in the temple to offer up one “tomid” offering every morning and another “tomid” offering every afternoon. The obvious question is how could this verse even compete with the other verses suggested let alone win the contest. What is so crucial about this mitzvah to the extent that it was decided to be the single most important verse in the whole Torah?

        An answer suggested is that the all-important lesson and message hiding behind this verse can be summed up in one word- Consistency. The korbon tomid of morning and afternoon were offered up every single day irrespective of all other considerations. The secret to succeed at anything in life, in this case religious observance and spiritual growth, is consistency. Uncalculated leaps of growth are often met with consequent falls.

        We need to be consistent Jews.

        R’ Ezer Pine
        ___________________________________
        ___________________________________

        Avodah, oath-alliance, and tohor middot form the judicial architecture of Israelite sovereignty. Torah mussar demands tohor middot not as private ethics but as judicial kavanah: the moral preparation to participate in a legal culture where interpersonal damages are adjudicated with precedent, equity, and national memory. To rebuild the Mishkan—does not to revive a sacrificial cult—but rather to restore the Sanhedrin model of lateral common-law courts, rooted in oath, guided by prophecy, and animated by the living flame of justice that defines the brit between Israel and our Tribal God.

        A significant tension within contemporary Jewish thought regarding the interpretation and application of halakhah (Jewish law) in relation to ethical principles and communal obligations. The reference to the debate among the tannaim in the Midrash underscores the complexity of defining a “great principle” in Judaism, where different voices emphasize various aspects of the tradition.

        The opinions of Ben Zoma, Ben Nannas, and Shimon ben Pazi reflect the multifaceted nature of Jewish law and ethics. Ben Zoma’s focus on the Shema emphasizes the importance of kre’a shma as tefillah דאורייתא, while Ben Nannas highlights interpersonal ethics through the command to love one’s neighbor; neighbor restricted to bnai brit Israel exclusively. Shimon ben Pazi’s reference to the Korban Tamid, points to the centrality of this Torah precedent as the basis of the Order of the Siddur ritual in Jewish communal life.

        The emphasis on avodah as a procedural backbone highlights the importance of tohor middot in the dedications made by the Yatzir HaTov within the heart. Where a blessing requires שם ומלכות – meaning blowing a spirit from within the Yatzir Ha’Tov within the heart with a specified tohor Oral Torah Horev middah – מלכות. This oath sworn alliance serves as the continuation of the Divine Brit cut with the Avot which continuously creates from nothing the chosen Cohen people.

        The concept of oath alliance Cohen duty refers to the Torah obligations to impose judicial court room lateral common law courts to hear and resolve damages disputes which divides our people continuously. The משל of korbanot teaches the נמשל of Judicial Sanhedrin common law lateral courtrooms as the k’vanna intent of building the Mishkan.

        Every ברכה requires שם ומלכות not merely for halakhic formality, but because it is a miniature reenactment of Horev—a recommitment to the oath-alliance that binds Israel to its judicial destiny. The Yetzir HaTov—the moral will within—is not emotion but juridical intent (kavvanah) expressed through tohor middot, aligned with Horev’s legal categories, as embodied in מלכות. This מלכות is not monarchy in the political sense, but juridical sovereignty—the power to hear, judge, and rectify disputes among Israel through the tefillah dedication of tohor middot which define and shape how Jews behave toward other Jews. The Siddur serves as the ‘table of contents’ Order by which the Framers of both Mishna and Gemara organized the Talmud. The 3 separate opinions, rephrase the same identical idea much like a blue print offers a Front, Top, Side perspectives!

        The interplay between halakhah, ethical principles, and communal obligations in Jewish thought represents a multi-dimensional interpretation of the “great principle”. Each opinion—Ben Zoma, Ben Nannas, and Shimon ben Pazi—highlights distinct yet interconnected aspects of Jewish life, emphasizing the importance of both ritual and ethical dimensions. Ben Zoma’s focus on the Shema as a foundational prayer underscores its significance as a mitzvah from the Torah (דאורייתא). This highlights the centrality of prayer in Jewish life and תולדות subservient role of the Shemone Esrei to remember the oath sworn by the Avot to continuously create from nothing the chosen Cohen people. Ben Nannas’ emphasis on loving one’s neighbor, reflects the ethical obligations that bind the Jewish community; Israel came out of Egypt to rule Canaan with righteous judicial courtroom justice which makes fair restorations of damages inflicted by Jews upon other Jews. Hence Torah mussar requires the dedication of tohor middot to bring about social behavior rooted in communal relationships and responsibilities. Shimon ben Pazi’s reference to Korban Tamid serves as a model for the Order of the Siddur as the fundamental kabbalah how the Framers organized both the Order of the T’NaCH and Talmud.

        The concept of avodah as a procedural backbone emphasizes the importance of tohor middot (pure character traits) in the spiritual and ethical life of the community. The Yatzir HaTov, representing the moral will, is integral to this process, as it shapes the intentions behind actions of tefillah kre’a shma and tefillat shemone esrei – both require tefillen because both have the k’vanna to swear a Torah oath. nderstanding positions the judicial system as a vital component of Jewish identity and practice, rooted in blessings which require שם ומלכות. The pursuit of judicial courtroom justice among our people, not merely ritualistic as the statute perversion halachic codes Yad, Tur, and Aruch falsely declare. The Siddur’s role as a ‘table of contents’ for the Mishna and Gemara illustrates how the oath brit sworn by the three Avot functions as the יסוד not only of the organization of the Siddur but of the organization of the T’NaCH, Mishna, Gemara, and Midrashim as well. This organization allows for a comprehensive understanding of the relationship between law, ethics, and communal worship. The perspectives of the prophets & tannaim\amoraim serve as a blueprint for understanding the complexities of Jewish common-law, and its application in contemporary life, reinforcing the importance of both ritual and prophetic mussar dimensions in maintaining a cohesive and vibrant community.

      20. I do no such thing. I’m all for justice. I want peace and justice for all people! Not just the Jews!

      26. Impossible to honor the oath brit which creates the chosen Cohen people יש מאין without remembering the exact Case/Rule oaths they swore to HaShem wherein they cut this brit alliance to forever create the chosen Cohen people יש מאין.
        ___________________________________________

        The Official ArtScroll Blog

        ArtScroll Staff·blog.artscroll.com·10h ago

        EMUNAH: Perhaps Even Double

        Adapted from: Living Emunah 8 by Rabbi David Ashear R’ Aharon Margalit was invited to speak in a shul on the topic of kibbud av va’eim. Part of his talk was about children judging their parents favorably. After the speech, an older couple was waiting to speak to him. The husband, who introduced himself as […]
        _________________________________________

        צדק צדק תרדוף …The repetition of צדק denotes not moral abstraction but procedural justice—pursuit of justice through due process, i.e., courtroom deliberation rooted in precedent and interpretation. The verb “תרדוף” implies active legal pursuit: the work of judges chasing interpretive coherence through live cases.

        The Oral Torah codification of the Sha’s Mishna functions as the key blueprint for judicial lateral common law courtrooms. No common ground exists with assimilated codes of religious ritual laws. Mishnayot rely upon the בניין אב and other 13 middot of Rabbi Yishmael as tools to derive legal architecture from precedent, not Greek & Roman statute legislation. The Middle Ages perversion of the Talmud to a statutory halacha handbook which defines the religion of Orthodox Judaism – simply completely off the דרך.

        The 13 Middot of rabbi Yishmael serve as interpretive tools. In essence the grammar of Jewish common law—tools to derive new rulings from precedent; not tools of exegetical cleverness or mysticism. Rashi as a linguistic exegete, building clarity through p’shat and influenced by the Aruch. His genius – semantic precision, but that does not satisfy the courtroom’s need for structural legal comparison. Rabbeinu Tam, representing the Tosafist shift, sees this as an error: Talmudic discourse isn’t a glossary—it’s a judicial method. Tosafot insist on sugya-correlation and cross-case inference, a reassertion of precedent-based interpretation.

        פרדס – not mysticism, but a layered interpretive logic of comparison, each level designed to extract new meaning through structural parallels, not imposed deductive frameworks. Greek logic deduces from axioms; פרדס derives from existing rulings. This is why sod is not mystical secret but the “deep structure” of legal alignment.

        The Tosafist project—especially Rabbeinu Tam’s critique of Rashi—as a demand to treat the Talmud as an evolving common law tradition, not merely an educational text. Rabbeinu Tam did not merely seek clarity—he sought legal structure. The Tosafists’ hallmark is cross-sugya precedent tracing, reviving the vitality of case-based halacha.

        Rashi as leaning toward lexical accessibility (influenced by the Aruch) explains why Rabbeinu Tam considered his approach incomplete for courtroom jurisprudence. Rashi’s clarity is p’shat; Tosafot demanded case linkage and dialectical rigor.

        Ibn Ezra’s rationalist method, shaped by Greek syllogistic logic, with the inductive פרדס logic of Rabbi Akiva. Your framing of Ibn Ezra as an “assimilated Hellenist” follows Hazal’s critique of Tzeddukim: intellectuals who replaced oral-interpretive dynamism with foreign models of fixed logic and systematic theology.

        The Rambam’s Mishneh Torah, perverted – due to his gross tuma assimilation – the open-ended legalism of the Talmud into a rigid ritualistic code, disconnected from live courtroom precedent. The Rambam’s embrace of universalist monotheism, influenced by Islamic rationalism and Neoplatonic abstraction, led his to construct his 13 rules of faith rather than צדק צדק תרדוף.

        The פרדס methodology (P’shat, Remez, Drash, Sod) not as a mystical toolset, but as a four-level interpretive model grounded in judicial logic—each level refining the ruling through comparison and precedent. This contrasts Greek logic which draws conclusions from abstract universals. This epistemic divergence has civilizational consequences. פרדס preserves legal humility and interpretive pluralism. Syllogism leads to dogmatism, codification, and political repression—traits seen both in Christian canon law and Islamic fiqh.

        Logically, Zionism opposed by Orthodox Judaism, leads toward a national restoration of Talmudic law as constitutional brit, rather than exile-style halachic pietism. This model restores Sanhedrin-style justice, rooted in precedent based lateral common law court system of justice. Justice, understood as the obligation placed squarely upon the shoulders of these Sanhedrin courts to seek fair compensation of damages inflicted by Jews upon other Jews.

        These three words located in the Book of D’varim define Judicial common law court room justice. משנה תורה, the other Name for the Book of D’varim serves as the foundation for rabbi Yechuda’s Sha’s Mishna. What does this Hebrew verb refer to? Answer Judicial common law courts! Hence the Gemara commentary to the Mishna learns by means of precedents. What term did the Sages of the Mishna refer to “precedents”? Answer: בניני אבות, like as found in the 13 middot of rabbi Yishmael. T’NaCH instructs prophetic mussar “common law(משנה תורה)”. Whereas the Talmud instructs ritual halacha “common law(משנה תורה)”.

        The Baali Tosafot commentary to the Talmud, specifically Rabeinu Tam, דוקא goes off the dof in search of precedents. Why? The chief criticism made against the Rashi commentary on the Talmud, The “Aruch” by Rabbi Nathan ben Yehiel of Rome did influence Rashi’s Talmudic commentary, as Rashi often drew upon earlier sources, including lexicons and dictionaries, to clarify terms and concepts in the Talmud. Rashi’s methodology involved providing clear explanations and definitions of words, which aligns with the approach taken in the “Aruch.” Rashi aimed to make the Talmud accessible to his readers, and the insights from the “Aruch” would have contributed to this goal. Rashi frequently referenced earlier works, including the “Aruch,” to explain Talmudic terms and phrases. This helped him provide a more comprehensive understanding of the text. The “Aruch” provided a foundation for this clarity by offering definitions and explanations of terms.

        Rabbi Abraham Ibn Ezra, in his commentary on the Chumash employed a different but somewhat parallel methodology. Ibn Ezra placed a strong emphasis on the linguistic aspects of the text, analyzing Hebrew words and their roots. He often provided etymological insights similar to those found in the “Aruch.” Ibn Ezra’s commentary also included philosophical and scientific perspectives, reflecting his broader intellectual interests. He sought to connect the biblical text with contemporary knowledge and thought.

        The 10th-century Islamic discovery and translation of ancient Greek texts, particularly those related to philosophy and logic, indeed had a significant impact on Jewish thinkers of the medieval period, including Rabbi Abraham Ibn Ezra. However, the influence of these texts on Rashi’s commentary was less pronounced. Ibn Ezra was deeply influenced by the works of Greek philosophers, particularly Aristotle and the Neoplatonists. He integrated their ideas into his commentaries, reflecting a broader intellectual engagement with philosophy and science. His approach often emphasized rationalism and logic, which he applied to biblical interpretation. He sought to reconcile Jewish thought with philosophical concepts, making his work more expansive and reflective of contemporary intellectual currents.

        Ibn Ezra’s focus on language and etymology was also informed by the logical structures found in Greek philosophy, allowing him to analyze biblical texts with a critical and systematic approach. By contrast Rashi’s Chumash commentary shaped by Rabbi Akiva’s פרדס logic system. The kabbalah of Rashi’s wisdom presented the public face of p’shat scholarship. But the study of p’shat compares to a man who stands upon his two legs. The other leg of Rashi’s p’shat Chumash commentary “drosh”. This paired “other” of Rashi p’shat makes a common law precedent search which utterly dominates and defines Rashi’s Chumash “p’shat”.

        Rashi relied heavily on earlier rabbinic sources and Talmudic discussions, emphasizing the importance of tradition and communal understanding over Ibn Ezra’s assimilation to ancient Greek culture and customs whore-house tumah sh’itta of avoda zarah scholarship.

        The Baali Tosafot, specifically the grand-son of Rashi, Rabbeinu Tam’s main criticism against the Rashi commentary to the Talmud, that Rashi most significantly failed to study the Talmud as a common law legal system. In 1232 the rabbis of Paris imposed a נידוי ban upon the Rambam’s halachic code and Guide to the Perplexed – due to Rambam’s assimilation on par with Ibn Ezra – whose son converted to Islam.

        Ibn Ezra and the Rambam directly compare to the Tzeddukim who instigated the Chanukkah Civil War wherein they along with the Syrian Greeks attempted to cause Israel to forget the Oral Torah logic format as explained through the kabbalah of rabbi Akiva’s פרדס logic sh’itta which explains the revelation of the Oral Torah at Horev. This logic format, a four-part inductive reasoning which compares Judicial Case/Ruling opinions with other similar Case/Rule judicial rulings. Herein defines how Talmudic common law understands the language of rabbi Yechuda Ha’Nasi’s Mishna.

        The Ba’alei Tosafot, including Rabbeinu Tam, critiqued Rashi for not fully engaging with the Talmud as a common law legal system. This critique highlights a tension between Rashi’s focus on clarity and the more complex legal analyses that later scholars sought to develop. The emphasis on common law and legal precedent became a hallmark of Tosafist scholarship.

        This מאי נפקא מינא distinction between פרדס inductive logic vs. foreign Greek syllogism deductive logic, while the latter compares to the satisfaction of a hog eating slop from a trough; the former contrasts Jewish judicial common law from Greek and Roman statute law legalism. Assimilated Jews “converted” the Talmud into codes of religious law divorced from Courtroom judicial rulings. The Rambam called Talmudic common law as too difficult for the Jewish common man to understand. His code perverted judicial law into religious belief system ritualism. Assimilated Rambam openly embraced the Universal God Monotheism theologies promoted by both “daughter religions” which negated that only Israel accepted the Torah at Sinai. The “daughter religions” openly repudiated the revelation of a tribal local God at Sinai.

        A sharp example of the perversity of the Rambam embracement of Monotheism and a Universal God, his absurd ruling that the 7 mitzvot bnai Noach applies to all Goyim across the world. Mesechta Sanhedrin introduces the aggadah of the 7 mitzvot bnai Noach as a reference to the distinction gere toshav have over mesechta Baba Kama’s “Nacree” Goy. The latter had no legal rights to sue an Israel for damages. Whereas the ger toshav enjoyed the legal right to sue an Israel for damages. The Rambam halachic perversion of the 7 mitzvot bnai Noach failed to grasp the legal distinction which the Torah itself makes between the gere toshav and the nacree/Canaani in the matter of giving treif flesh to the ger toshav or selling the treif flesh to the nacree/Canaani.

      28. CNN attacked by (Israeli) West Bank settlers

        Michael Ruark propaganda
        ________________________________________
        ________________________________________

        CNN — isn’t journalism. It’s theater

        This report reflects the deeply biased, one-sided propaganda that demonizes Israeli civilians and whitewashes terror infrastructure under the guise of journalism. The central tactic here is inversion: the defenders are framed as aggressors. No mention of Hamas-affiliated provocations or organized Palestinian violence that precedes many of these encounters.

        The CNN narrative describes settlers as attacking “in broad daylight” while downplaying the broader context of national security collapse in the West Bank, where Hamas and PIJ cells are actively operating. The emotional framing—”masked settlers,” “clubs,” “burning cars”—evokes lynch mobs, reinforcing ancient antisemitic tropes.

        Michael Ruark promotes CNN Fake News, they cite the death of Saif Musalat, described as a peaceful visitor from Florida—yet provide no evidence that settlers initiated unprovoked violence. The IDF reports a rock ambush, a common trigger for deadly riots and firefights.

        The PA health ministry is used as a primary source—hardly a neutral or credible voice. The Foreign Press Association blames Israel while ignoring the near-daily terror attacks against Jews in the area. Not a word about how “refugee camps” in Jenin and Nablus function as fortified terror bases stocked with explosives, arms, and tunnel networks.

        Quoting WhatsApp rumors, fire footage, and anonymous “witnesses,” the article floats an unsubstantiated claim that “tens of thousands” of Palestinians have been expelled. The IDF has not engaged in expulsions, but in precision operations targeting militants. Civilians are often warned to evacuate before operations to avoid crossfire. The mass displacements are largely self-initiated or pushed by Hamas propaganda encouraging martyrdom narratives. The comparison to genocidal campaigns is a grotesque inversion of fact.

        The article buries a critical fact at the very end: since October 7, over 6,000 terrorists have been arrested and over 950 Palestinians killed, with the IDF stressing the majority were armed combatants or engaged in active violence. These are counterterror operations, not settler pogroms. By blurring the line between militant and civilian, this propaganda sanitizes terror and criminalizes self-defense. The repeated accusations that Israel operates with “impunity” echo the UN’s historically biased anti-Israel stance, ignoring the real impunity enjoyed by Hamas, Islamic Jihad, and PFLP fighters in the West Bank.

        This Yellow Journalism bleeding rag trash the essence of structural antisemitism. Jews are framed as violent, conspiratorial mobs attacking innocent Arabs. Jews are framed as violent, conspiratorial mobs attacking innocent Arabs. The implication that Jews are “colonial outsiders” in Judea/Samaria is historical denialism.

      29. Illegal colonisation, illegal settlements, attacking locals. Guy beaten to death and you say it’s biased!!

      31. You’re on the side practicing genocide and killing women and children. That’s not propaganda; that’s fact! Withholding water, food, medicine and then shooting desperate people. No morality. Subhuman Nazis!!

      32. Your on the side of promoting blood libel slanders just as did your barbarian forefathers during the Middle Ages. You and them absolutely no different.

      34. My family killed in this war. YOU vile stinking piece of shit. So easy to preach bull shit piety while a 1000 miles distant. Go fuck yourself.

      35. Morality is morality. Right is right. Genocide is genocide.
        What was happening to the Jews in Germany in the 1930s was nobody else’s business? Right?
        Fortunately we went and liberated the concentration camps.

      36. You – silly dumb ass – do not determine morality or right or genocide. For no other reason other than your shit for brains declaration that Nazi crimes in the 1930s ” was nobody else’s business”.

        Fuck your revisionist history. The Allies knew about the death camps but refused to bomb the rail lines. Go shoot yourself in the head and make the Planet a better place.

      37. Don’t be stupid. I was putting forward your own stupid argument. Yes they should have bombed the railway lines. They chose to go for the war machine and try to win the war.

      38. Stupid argument? How many bombs of the millions dropped on German cities full of women and children would it have taken to knock out the rail-lines to the death camps? Idiot.

      39. Probably the wrong choice but a choice made in war – to go for the munitions factories not the rail lines.

      45. [[[ ” Withholding water, food, medicine and then shooting desperate people. No morality. Subhuman Nazis!!” ]]] The Boer War, WWI, WWII, your barbarian shit for brains people did the very blood libel accusation that you scream now. Fuck OFF

      46. Are you so stupid that you think that barbaric acts committed in the past justify genocide now? BTW I wasn’t alive during any of those wars! You seem to want to hold me to account for everything that has happened in the past. How idiotic!

      47. Name a single case where a nation attacked by another nation, the nation attacked having military superiority — did not initiate a war upon the aggressor nation? Fuck your pie in the sky revisionist history bull shit.

        Your participation or cowardly lack their off changes nothing Mr. BTW. You witnessed personally the Iraq war British nation building imperialism. You witnessed the invasion to the same in Afghanistan. You witnessed the obliteration of Libia by British and US forces. Sack of shit – eat shit and die.

      48. The perceived omissions or failures of others, such as Leo Tolstoy, Rabbi Stephen S. Wise, and Amy Katz, can be viewed as complicity or indifference in the face of injustice. The consequences of such omissions can be profound, especially during times of crisis, as they may contribute to a culture of silence or inaction regarding pressing issues like antisemitism. Leadership morally opposes antisemitism, it does not quietly ignore violent pogroms like the Oct 7th 2023 Hamas surprise attack! Leaders especially those who make claims of moral superiority and hold positions of influence, if they actively oppose hatred and discrimination they must do it equally across the board. Calling Israeli leaders “war criminals” while quiet upon war crimes committed by others, like Hamas, makes such people antisemitic pigs.

      49. The illegal settlements are a bunch of extremist religious nutcases! They have no right to be there and should get the hell out!! They are armed, aggressive and plain nasty like all fundamentalists of any religion.

      51. Yes. The Americans treated Native Americans like shit. They should be tried and found guilty of terrible genocide. Two wrongs never make a right. Slavery and the holocaust happened. That is no excuse for repeating it. The settlements are illegal under international law – but the religious extremists never pay attention to the law, do they? They are quite happy with torture, indoctrination, war and violence if it fits their religious priorities! They are happy with the present genocide and terror. Evil bastards!!

      52. Fuck YOU the British slaughtered entire populations in the 19th Century.

        The British Raj in India involved numerous violent suppressions, including the Sepoy Mutiny of 1857, which was brutally crushed. The British response included widespread reprisals, leading to significant loss of life among both combatants and civilians.

        The Sepoy Mutiny of 1857, which the British brutally crushed, included widespread reprisals, leading to significant loss of life among both combatants and civilians.

        The British engaged in various military campaigns across Africa, often resulting in high civilian casualties. The Anglo-Zulu War (1879) and the suppression of the Ashanti Empire are examples where British forces faced fierce resistance, leading to violent confrontations.

        While not a direct act of slaughter, British policies during the Irish Potato Famine (1845-1852), exacerbated the crisis, leading to the deaths of approximately one million people and mass emigration. The British government’s inadequate response has been criticized as neglectful and exploitative.

        Although this famine occurred in the 20th century, it was rooted in colonial policies that prioritized British economic interests over the welfare of the local population, leading to millions of deaths.

        The British colonization of Australia led to the displacement and deaths of many Indigenous Australians. Policies of land seizure, violence, and introduced diseases decimated Indigenous populations.

        The British colonization and subsequent conflicts, such as the New Zealand Wars, resulted in significant loss of life among the Māori population and the appropriation of their lands.

        The 19th century was marked by significant colonial expansion and imperialism, particularly by European powers, including Britain. This period saw numerous instances of violence, oppression, and atrocities against various populations around the world. Here are some notable examples:

        The British engaged in various military campaigns across Africa, often resulting in high civilian casualties. The Anglo-Zulu War (1879) and the suppression of the Ashanti Empire are examples where British forces faced fierce resistance, leading to violent confrontations.

        – **Australia**: The British colonization of Australia led to the displacement and deaths of many Indigenous Australians. Policies of land seizure, violence, and introduced diseases decimated Indigenous populations.

        The British colonization and subsequent conflicts, such as the New Zealand Wars, resulted in significant loss of life among the Māori population and the appropriation of their lands.

        Second Boer War (1899-1902): The British established concentration camps for Boer civilians, leading to high mortality rates due to disease and malnutrition. This practice was one of the first instances of using concentration camps in modern warfare.

        The 19th century was a period of significant violence and oppression associated with British imperialism. The consequences of these actions have had lasting impacts on the affected populations and continue to shape historical narratives and discussions about colonialism today.

        The Opium Wars were significant conflicts in the mid-19th century that had profound effects on China and its relationship with Western powers, particularly Britain. The First Opium War began when the Chinese government confiscated and destroyed over 1,000 tons of opium in 1839. In response, Britain sent military forces to protect its drug-trade interests.

        The Opium Wars are often viewed as a period of national humiliation for China, leading to a loss of sovereignty and the imposition of unequal treaties. The influx of opium exacerbated social issues, leading to widespread addiction and contributing to economic instability. The Opium Wars exemplify the violent and exploitative nature of imperialism, particularly in the context of British actions in China.

      53. I quite agree. Many of the things carried out in our colonial past were reprehensible. We’re not doing them now; you are!

      55. Carried out by Hamas not Gazans – idiot! You have a habit of blaming women and children for the horrors perpetrated by others. What Hamas did was terrible. What Israel is doing is far worse! War criminals!

      56. Fuck YOU! Gazans freely elected Ham-ass in the 2006 elections. Actions have consequences. Despite your shallow reactionary pie in the sky revisionist history.

      57. Some did. Not all. No kids voted for Hamas. Not all Gazans agree with Hamas. They are not guilty.

      59. Dumb Ass you know nothing of the barbaric history of your own people. Go shoot yourself in the head, maybe it will increase your intelligence.

      60. I know lots about our history. A lot of it was abhorrent. I’m not excusing it. It’s you excusing genocide! Netanyahu is a wanted war criminal. The Jewish Government is carrying out genocide on the Palestinians. It’s disgusting!

      61. Bull shit. Not excusing it … but you yellow bellied dog return to eat your own vomit and pretend your opinion of Israel matters! Idiot you confuse a ICC blood libel against Bibi as a judicial ruling after the case tried in court!! Stupid idiot. S. Africa’s accusation just another yellow belly coward guilty of Apartheid! Go Fuck yourself.

      63. Fuck You. Shit for brains, Oct 7th has its consequences. According to your bull shit, the US should have never attacked Japan after the surprise Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor on Dec 7th 1941. Fuck Off with your vile revisionist history.

      64. Japan declared war. What we are talking here is revenge against innocents – a war against civilians – genocide and war crimes.

      66. No. A terrorist attack. War is against military not women and children – that’s genocide and war crimes.

      67. Then bitch and moan to Ham-ass who employs women and children as propaganda Human shields. YO silly conceited “I’m full of truth” shit for brains, explain the casualty figures of British wars fought in Iraq and Afghanistan. Go Fuck your bloated pig like identity of shit.

      68. All war crimes. You use war crimes to justify war crimes. I never supported the actions in Iraq and Afghanistan. War crimes were committed. Deplorable.

      69. You have war crimes crammed up your butt where you store your shitty brain. The Japanese committed war-crimes in China. Mao committed war crimes against his own people during the Cultural Revolution. Pol Pot and Idi Amin Dada; Pinochet in Chili etc etc ect examples of actual war crimes. Now Fuck Off. Idiot.

      70. War crimes are very prevalent. You’ve joined the club. I live for the day when all who commit these crimes are brought to justice.

      74. The bankrupt 35 Trillion dollar national debt Federal Government took post Civil War to present Federal corruption to currently threaten America with its 2nd Civil War.

        OKC bombing redux

        In the past I’ve written about it ad nauseam — the Oklahoma City bombing on April 19, 1995. Then, two nights ago, there it was again in a series of three hour-long episodes
        _________________________________
        _________________________________

        Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols their motivations were deeply rooted in their opposition to government actions, particularly the Waco siege in 1993, where the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) attempted to execute a search warrant at the Branch Davidian compound, leading to a standoff that resulted in the deaths of 76 individuals. Additionally, the Ruby Ridge incident in 1992, which involved a confrontation between federal agents and the Weaver family, further fueled their anti-government sentiments. McVeigh and Nichols meticulously planned the bombing, believing that it would send a strong message against what they perceived as government overreach and tyranny.

        On April 19, 1995, McVeigh parked a rented Ryder truck filled with explosives outside the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City. The explosion, which occurred at 9:02 AM, caused widespread destruction and resulted in significant loss of life. The bombing resulted in the deaths of 168 people, including 19 children, and injured over 600 others. It caused significant destruction to the surrounding area and damaged or destroyed several nearby buildings.

        The Waco siege and the Ruby Ridge incident were two significant events in the 1990s that involved confrontations between federal law enforcement and individuals or groups that were perceived as threats to public safety or law and order. Both incidents raised serious questions about the use of government authority and the actions taken by federal agents. The Waco siege involved the Branch Davidian religious sect, led by David Koresh, who was suspected of stockpiling illegal weapons. The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) attempted to execute a search warrant on February 28, 1993, which led to a gunfight and the deaths of four ATF agents and six Branch Davidians.

        The federal government, under President Bill Clinton, justified the siege as a necessary action to enforce laws regarding illegal weapons and to protect public safety. The FBI took over the operation, which lasted for 51 days, culminating in a final assault on April 19, 1993, that resulted in a fire that consumed the compound, killing 76 individuals, including many women and children. The handling of the siege was widely criticized for its aggressive tactics and the loss of life. GOP opposition critics of President Clinton accused his leadership of complete, utter and criminal incompetence. Clinton apparently to busy forcing young women to give him a blow job. The GOP opposition condemned the Clinton government for grossly overstepped its authority and its utter and complete incompetence to negotiate effectively. The impeachment of Clinton served as a Parliamentary vote of No Confidence in the Government!

        The Ruby Ridge incident involved Randy Weaver, who was wanted for failing to appear in court on a firearms charge. A standoff occurred between Weaver’s family and federal agents, including the U.S. Marshals and the FBI, which escalated into violence, resulting in the deaths of Weaver’s wife, Vicki, and his son, Samuel. The federal government, under President George H.W. Bush, guilty of State War-crimes in his illegal invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan and strongly suspected of justifying this imperialist nation building through the 9/11 inside job attack which resembles something like the Dec 7th Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor.

        But Cheney/Bush in their absolute and insane criminal arrogance did not approach Congress and ask for a Congressional Declaration of War. Instead these corrupt opportunistic war criminals passed their vile Patriot Act which negated the Bill of Rights of the US Constitution. Similar to Waco, the actions taken at Ruby Ridge were criticized for being excessive and poorly managed, leading to unnecessary loss of life.

        In both cases, there was significant public outcry and criticism of the government’s actions, but very few individuals faced legal consequences. Federal bureaucraps almost Universally operate without any accountability for their actions or regulatory laws they illegally impose upon the American people. This illegal forth branch of the US Government shares an incestuous relationship with Federally established Corporate monopolies. The latter has a revolving door incest/taboo relationship with Federal homo-bureaucraps.

        This illegal 4th Branch of the post Civil War Washington over-reach Government negates the Commerce Clause which relegates intra-state autonomy to the Legislatures of the States of the Union to bureaucratically regulate all intra-state trade & commerce, independent and free from Big Brother Federal carpet-bagger pervert bureaucraps overwatch. Post Civil War the Lincoln GOP dismantled the States authority to appoint Federal Senators to Congress through a Constitutional Amendment.

        The damned Yankees despise States Rights in favor of mob rule democracy. Hence Federal agents often operate under legal fiction protections that shield them from prosecution – when they act in the name of the State! This perversion of the Constitution set the stage wherein the incest revolving door Bureaucrap-Government established (Socialist) Corporate Monopolies function as a concealed Government which pulls the strings of the elected puppets of the 3 Branches of the Federal Government. Herein explains why it cost over a billion dollars to elect a US President to Office. The State established Federal corporate monopolies shape and determine the outcome of all “democratic” elections. These “elections” do not employ paper ballots!

        Investigations into the actions of federal agents invarably conclude that the use of bureaucrapic force – completely justified. Leading to a mafia like shielding – lack of criminal charges of politicians and bureaucraps; Obama can spy on candidate Trump with a fraud hoax Russia-Gate/Water-Gate, with complete and total impunity or risk. The Federal Government plays by a completely different set of rules than those imposed upon the peasant citizens\serf populations. Federal employees enjoy far more benefits than the bread crumbs thrown to the mob masses; the bankrupt social security by which the Federal government taxes the people does not apply to Federal employees and Congress personnel. The decision not to pursue charges against government officials based upon this illegal two-tiered corrupt legal system the direct result of the Lincoln rejection of Jeffersonian Democracy.

        The Oklahoma City bombing occurred on April 19, 1995, and was one of the deadliest acts of domestic terrorism in U.S. history. The attack was carried out by Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols, who sought to retaliate against the federal government, particularly in response to the Waco siege in 1993 and the Ruby Ridge incident in 1992. Civil War Santa Claus is coming to town.

      77. The German public were in denial about the Nazi genocide project against the Jews.
        You are in denial about the genocide your government is perpetrating against the Palestinian civilian population.
        You should read about it and see the terrible pictures and footage coming out of Gaza – starving children, wounded and dead, rubble. It’s an atrocity.
        You are defending genocide and war crimes. You should be ashamed. It is bringing the whole Jewish people into disrepute – to be reviled by the world (apart from far-right Nazis like Trump).
        https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/top-genocide-scholars-unanimous-israel-committing-genocide-gaza-investigation-finds
        https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2024/11/un-special-committee-finds-israels-warfare-methods-gaza-consistent-genocide
        https://www.ecchr.eu/fileadmin/Q_As/ECCHR_Q_A__Gaza_and_Genocide_20241210.pdfhttps://news.un.org/en/story/2024/03/1147976
        https://www.bu.edu/articles/2024/is-israel-committing-genocide-in-gaza/
        https://www.amnesty.org.uk/press-releases/israelopt-fresh-evidence-genocide-satellite-imagery-reveals-total-razing-khuzaa

      78. Amnesty International has faced criticism from various groups regarding its stance on Israel and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Critics argue that the organization exhibits bias in its reporting and assessments, claiming that it disproportionately focuses on Israel’s actions while downplaying or ignoring violations by other parties in the conflict, including Palestinian groups.

        Reports Labeling Israel as an Apartheid State: Amnesty International’s 2022 report that characterized Israel’s policies towards Palestinians as apartheid was met with significant backlash. Critics argued that this label oversimplifies a complex situation and fails to acknowledge the nuances of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Selective Reporting on Violence: Some critics claim that Amnesty International’s reports tend to emphasize Israeli military actions while downplaying or not adequately addressing violence perpetrated by Palestinian groups, such as rocket attacks on Israeli civilians.

        Language and Terminology: The use of charged language in reports, such as referring to Israeli actions as “war crimes” or “collective punishment,” has been criticized as inflammatory and biased. Detractors argue that such terminology can skew public perception and lacks a balanced view of the conflict. Focus on Settlements: Amnesty International vocal about Israeli settlements in the Samaria, labeling them “illegal under international law”, ignores the fact that Britain separated Trans-Jordan from its League Palestine mandate at the Jordan river. Critics argue that this focus ignores the historical kingdom of Israel in Samaria. That no Arab referred to themselves as Palestinian – not till 1964.

        Omission of Context: Some reports have been criticized for lacking context regarding the security concerns faced by Israel, such as the threat of terrorism. Critics argue that without this context, the reports can misrepresent the motivations behind Israeli actions. Responses to Specific Incidents: During conflicts, such as the Gaza wars, Amnesty International’s responses have been scrutinized for what some see as a disproportionate focus on Israeli military responses while not adequately addressing the actions of Hamas and other militant groups.

      79. Marco Rubio Sanctions ICC Judges After They Target U.S. and Israel in Explosive Rulings

        In a sweeping move, Senator Marco Rubio announced sanctions against four International Criminal Court justices.
        ________________________________________
        ________________________________________

        Marco Rubio’s sanctions on ICC judges—in response to politically driven rulings targeting the U.S. and Israel—represent the first serious American pushback against the expanding overreach of international legal institutions. But these sanctions merely scratch the surface. If Israel were to bomb the International Criminal Court in The Hague for the crime of judicial overreach, it would unleash a shockwave through the foundations of the post-WWII European imperial legal order.

        Such an act would shatter the illusion that the Rome Statute and its court represent binding global authority. In truth, the ICC is a political weapon wielded disproportionately against Western democracies and their allies, while shielding rogue regimes. Its authority rests on consensus, not enforcement. The Rome Treaty would be exposed as not worth the paper it’s written on.

        Europe forfeited its moral right to judge the Jewish people the moment it orchestrated the Shoah. Any European claim to universal justice—especially when applied selectively against the Jewish state—is hypocrisy cloaked in humanitarianism. The ICC’s rulings against Israel are not about war crimes; they are ritual acts of expiation for Europe’s own genocidal guilt. But that guilt is not Israel’s burden to carry. To bomb the ICC would be to formally reject Europe’s post-Nazi pretensions to legal supremacy and declare: “You have no right to judge us.”

        Bombing the ICC would have the same historical effect as the 1956 Suez Crisis: the end of European claims to independent geopolitical authority. Just as France and the UK’s failed bid to reclaim the Suez Canal revealed their imperial impotence, an Israeli destruction of the ICC would reveal the EU’s inability to project legal-moral power beyond its own borders.

        What the EU has is not law, but a narrative infrastructure—paper treaties, postmodern guilt, and international NGOs wielding legal language as a substitute for lost religious and imperial confidence.

        A targeted Israeli strike on the ICC would not trigger war. It would trigger disbelief, followed by narrative collapse, and finally a global reckoning with Western legal hypocrisy. The EU would be faced with the question: do we escalate to save face—or submit to an Israeli dictate which radically limits the EU authority in the balance of power in the Middle East and in Europe.

        If Israel bombed the Court of the Hague for the crime of judicial over-reach. This would set a precedent that the establishment of the ICC through the Rome Treaty – not worth the paper the Rome Treaty written upon. Widespread EU condemnations Big Deal. England and France have already broken off diplomatic relations with Israel.

        The Trump Government in Washington most likely would support Israel if Israel bombed the Court of the Hague for judicial over-reach. The Rome Treaty established Court would most likely dissolve. It would most definitely challenge the judicial jurisdiction of a European Court over Israel!

        Post Shoah Europe lost its rights to judge Jews. The destruction of the Pie in the Sky Rome Treaty would establish a major political precedent that European imperialism stops at the borders of the EU member states alone.

        The assertion that bombing the ICC in The Hague would lead to a collapse of the EU’s prestige is a strong viewpoint that reflects significant concerns about the authority and effectiveness of international institutions.

        If a member state or a country with significant geopolitical influence, like Israel, were to attack an international institution such as the ICC, it could be perceived as a direct challenge to the authority of not only the ICC but also the broader framework of international law that the EU supports.

        In short: bombing the Court of the Hague would radically change the balance of power in Europe. For the first time since the Muslim invasion of Western Europe a major disruption of European political autonomy would result.

        The EU would either put up or shut up: either they would declare War against Israel or not. The Nato alliance, if the US backed Israel would unquestionably collapse. The EU’s credibility as a defender of international law would cease to exist – gone like a puff of smoke. Israel would have called the bluff of the EU, like as if bombing the ICC compares to a hand of stud poker! This could lead to a more fragmented international order, challenging the EU’s role as a global actor.

        An attack on the ICC could set a precedent that undermines the enforcement of international law, leading to a situation where states feel empowered to act unilaterally without regard for international institutions.

        The incident could complicate diplomatic relations not only between Israel and the EU but also between other countries and international organizations. It could lead to a reevaluation of how states engage with international legal frameworks.

        The UN itself would most likely collapse like as did the League of Nations. If nothing else, the historical relationship between Europe and Israel, particularly in the context of the Shoah and post-war UN attempt to compare Israel to the European Nazi crimes against humanity, adds layers of complexity to this European projectionism of its own Nazi guilt and the moral bankruptcy of both Western and Eastern Roman church moral authority over European civilizations.

        The implications of such an act would resonate deeply within the historical narrative of European-Jewish relations and radically shift the narrative reversing the role of Jews as dominant and the church as dhimmi slaves – utterly rejected and despised.

        The entire European security architecture is underwritten by the United States, both financially and militarily. Without U.S. backing, NATO becomes functionally hollow. France and the UK retain nuclear capability, but their conventional power is insufficient to act independently against a U.S.-aligned state like Israel.

        No EU state would risk confrontation with the U.S., their most vital ally, over a non-NATO event like an Israeli action against the ICC. EU states are deeply post-military in culture. Their battlefield is law, narrative, and diplomacy—not armed force.

        Even in the face of Russian invasion (Ukraine), EU states have limited direct engagement, preferring economic sanctions, legal resolutions, and humanitarian aid. Against Israel, the EU’s instinct would be: denounce, sanction, isolate—not mobilize or fight.

        Much of EU condemnation of Israel is a projection of its own unresolved guilt over colonialism and the Holocaust. This moral outrage stops at the threshold of real cost. That’s why you see relentless UN resolutions, ICC motions, and media warfare—but not realpolitik confrontation. Israel calling their bluff—if the U.S. holds firm—exposes their impotence. If Israel bombed the ICC in the Hague – No War. No boots. No tanks. NO Article 5 Nato involvement. The collapse of Nato as an alliance.

        Symbolic institutions (like the ICC) to claim moral authority—but has no spine when force or geopolitical will counters that narrative. If Israel, backed by a U.S. administration, were to shatter a legal myth like the ICC’s authority … No war, but rather most likely the total collapse of EU imperialist Post WWII illusion of legal hegemony on par with England and France failure to capture and seize the Suez canal in the 1956 War. It would clearly reset the terms of European involvement in global legal power.

      86. Arse about tit! You’re the one condoning genocide. *I’m the one calling you out for supporting the genocide of the Palestinians. Only one evil fucker here!!

      87. Fuck you dog. 40,000 Gazans – more than half actual combatants/terrorists your holier than thou hypocrisy declares “genocide” yet 600,000 Iraqi non soldiers butched by British and US imperialism your bald faced cowardice ignores.

      88. And you say I swallow propaganda?? This justifies blowing up hospitals and blowing children to pieces as they queue for water??
        The Iraq war another evil I do not justify. It’s you who support death with your racism.

      89. Douche bag! Hamas fills hospitals with weapons and soldiers. This makes hospitals, schools, UN buildings etc that serves as military sites of Hamas personnel military targets. Dumb ass. You idiot! How much food and water did British forces give the German people, the Iraqi people, and the Afghanistan people? Fuck Off.

      90. That does not mean you can bomb hospitals and schools; it means you have to use other tactics so innocent people are not killed. You justify war crimes.

      91. BS. Hospitals that store weapons and soldiers no longer hospitals. Ass hat Britain has such a great reputation … NOT.

      92. I can only think you haven’t seen the sick patients being removed after the bombing. They are hospitals. I havwe listened to the doctors describing what happened. You believe lies.

      93. I can only think your addicted to Hamas staged propaganda. Building which store weapons and troops do not qualify as “non-belligerent”, neutral structures. Who pays the saleries of the Ham-ass doctors? Answer: Ham-ass.

      94. I have no problem with Israel going after Hamas. I have a problem with bombing civilians, killing women and children and using destruction of houses, withdrawal of medicine, water and food as weapons of war. They are war crimes.

      95. Fuck YOU. A majority of those “civilians” elected Ham-Ass into power in the 2006 elections. Same “civilian population” handed out sweets and candies after the Oct 7th pogrom. Go fuck yourself.

      99. Idiot Europeans like yourself bear and carry the guilt of Shoah. Coward you cannot address your guilt other than attempting to make a scape-gate of Israel.

      100. The German public were in denial about the Nazi genocide project against the Jews.
        You are in denial about the genocide your government is perpetrating against the Palestinian civilian population.
        You should read about it and see the terrible pictures and footage coming out of Gaza – starving children, wounded and dead, rubble. It’s an atrocity.
        You are defending genocide and war crimes. You should be ashamed. It is bringing the whole Jewish people into disrepute – to be reviled by the world (apart from far-right Nazis like Trump).
        https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/top-genocide-scholars-unanimous-israel-committing-genocide-gaza-investigation-finds
        https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2024/11/un-special-committee-finds-israels-warfare-methods-gaza-consistent-genocide
        https://www.ecchr.eu/fileadmin/Q_As/ECCHR_Q_A__Gaza_and_Genocide_20241210.pdfhttps://news.un.org/en/story/2024/03/1147976
        https://www.bu.edu/articles/2024/is-israel-committing-genocide-in-gaza/
        https://www.amnesty.org.uk/press-releases/israelopt-fresh-evidence-genocide-satellite-imagery-reveals-total-razing-khuzaa

      102. Marco Rubio Sanctions ICC Judges After They Target U.S. and Israel in Explosive Rulings

        In a sweeping move, Senator Marco Rubio announced sanctions against four International Criminal Court justices.
        ________________________________________
        ________________________________________

        Marco Rubio’s sanctions on ICC judges—in response to politically driven rulings targeting the U.S. and Israel—represent the first serious American pushback against the expanding overreach of international legal institutions. But these sanctions merely scratch the surface. If Israel were to bomb the International Criminal Court in The Hague for the crime of judicial overreach, it would unleash a shockwave through the foundations of the post-WWII European imperial legal order.

        Such an act would shatter the illusion that the Rome Statute and its court represent binding global authority. In truth, the ICC is a political weapon wielded disproportionately against Western democracies and their allies, while shielding rogue regimes. Its authority rests on consensus, not enforcement. The Rome Treaty would be exposed as not worth the paper it’s written on.

        Europe forfeited its moral right to judge the Jewish people the moment it orchestrated the Shoah. Any European claim to universal justice—especially when applied selectively against the Jewish state—is hypocrisy cloaked in humanitarianism. The ICC’s rulings against Israel are not about war crimes; they are ritual acts of expiation for Europe’s own genocidal guilt. But that guilt is not Israel’s burden to carry. To bomb the ICC would be to formally reject Europe’s post-Nazi pretensions to legal supremacy and declare: “You have no right to judge us.”

        Bombing the ICC would have the same historical effect as the 1956 Suez Crisis: the end of European claims to independent geopolitical authority. Just as France and the UK’s failed bid to reclaim the Suez Canal revealed their imperial impotence, an Israeli destruction of the ICC would reveal the EU’s inability to project legal-moral power beyond its own borders.

        What the EU has is not law, but a narrative infrastructure—paper treaties, postmodern guilt, and international NGOs wielding legal language as a substitute for lost religious and imperial confidence.

        A targeted Israeli strike on the ICC would not trigger war. It would trigger disbelief, followed by narrative collapse, and finally a global reckoning with Western legal hypocrisy. The EU would be faced with the question: do we escalate to save face—or submit to an Israeli dictate which radically limits the EU authority in the balance of power in the Middle East and in Europe.

        If Israel bombed the Court of the Hague for the crime of judicial over-reach. This would set a precedent that the establishment of the ICC through the Rome Treaty – not worth the paper the Rome Treaty written upon. Widespread EU condemnations Big Deal. England and France have already broken off diplomatic relations with Israel.

        The Trump Government in Washington most likely would support Israel if Israel bombed the Court of the Hague for judicial over-reach. The Rome Treaty established Court would most likely dissolve. It would most definitely challenge the judicial jurisdiction of a European Court over Israel!

        Post Shoah Europe lost its rights to judge Jews. The destruction of the Pie in the Sky Rome Treaty would establish a major political precedent that European imperialism stops at the borders of the EU member states alone.

        The assertion that bombing the ICC in The Hague would lead to a collapse of the EU’s prestige is a strong viewpoint that reflects significant concerns about the authority and effectiveness of international institutions.

        If a member state or a country with significant geopolitical influence, like Israel, were to attack an international institution such as the ICC, it could be perceived as a direct challenge to the authority of not only the ICC but also the broader framework of international law that the EU supports.

        In short: bombing the Court of the Hague would radically change the balance of power in Europe. For the first time since the Muslim invasion of Western Europe a major disruption of European political autonomy would result.

        The EU would either put up or shut up: either they would declare War against Israel or not. The Nato alliance, if the US backed Israel would unquestionably collapse. The EU’s credibility as a defender of international law would cease to exist – gone like a puff of smoke. Israel would have called the bluff of the EU, like as if bombing the ICC compares to a hand of stud poker! This could lead to a more fragmented international order, challenging the EU’s role as a global actor.

        An attack on the ICC could set a precedent that undermines the enforcement of international law, leading to a situation where states feel empowered to act unilaterally without regard for international institutions.

        The incident could complicate diplomatic relations not only between Israel and the EU but also between other countries and international organizations. It could lead to a reevaluation of how states engage with international legal frameworks.

        The UN itself would most likely collapse like as did the League of Nations. If nothing else, the historical relationship between Europe and Israel, particularly in the context of the Shoah and post-war UN attempt to compare Israel to the European Nazi crimes against humanity, adds layers of complexity to this European projectionism of its own Nazi guilt and the moral bankruptcy of both Western and Eastern Roman church moral authority over European civilizations.

        The implications of such an act would resonate deeply within the historical narrative of European-Jewish relations and radically shift the narrative reversing the role of Jews as dominant and the church as dhimmi slaves – utterly rejected and despised.

        The entire European security architecture is underwritten by the United States, both financially and militarily. Without U.S. backing, NATO becomes functionally hollow. France and the UK retain nuclear capability, but their conventional power is insufficient to act independently against a U.S.-aligned state like Israel.

        No EU state would risk confrontation with the U.S., their most vital ally, over a non-NATO event like an Israeli action against the ICC. EU states are deeply post-military in culture. Their battlefield is law, narrative, and diplomacy—not armed force.

        Even in the face of Russian invasion (Ukraine), EU states have limited direct engagement, preferring economic sanctions, legal resolutions, and humanitarian aid. Against Israel, the EU’s instinct would be: denounce, sanction, isolate—not mobilize or fight.

        Much of EU condemnation of Israel is a projection of its own unresolved guilt over colonialism and the Holocaust. This moral outrage stops at the threshold of real cost. That’s why you see relentless UN resolutions, ICC motions, and media warfare—but not realpolitik confrontation. Israel calling their bluff—if the U.S. holds firm—exposes their impotence. If Israel bombed the ICC in the Hague – No War. No boots. No tanks. NO Article 5 Nato involvement. The collapse of Nato as an alliance.

        Symbolic institutions (like the ICC) to claim moral authority—but has no spine when force or geopolitical will counters that narrative. If Israel, backed by a U.S. administration, were to shatter a legal myth like the ICC’s authority … No war, but rather most likely the total collapse of EU imperialist Post WWII illusion of legal hegemony on par with England and France failure to capture and seize the Suez canal in the 1956 War. It would clearly reset the terms of European involvement in global legal power.

      105. The German public were in denial about the Nazi genocide project against the Jews.
        You are in denial about the genocide your government is perpetrating against the Palestinian civilian population.
        You should read about it and see the terrible pictures and footage coming out of Gaza – starving children, wounded and dead, rubble. It’s an atrocity.
        You are defending genocide and war crimes. You should be ashamed. It is bringing the whole Jewish people into disrepute – to be reviled by the world (apart from far-right Nazis like Trump).
        https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/top-genocide-scholars-unanimous-israel-committing-genocide-gaza-investigation-finds
        https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2024/11/un-special-committee-finds-israels-warfare-methods-gaza-consistent-genocide
        https://www.ecchr.eu/fileadmin/Q_As/ECCHR_Q_A__Gaza_and_Genocide_20241210.pdfhttps://news.un.org/en/story/2024/03/1147976
        https://www.bu.edu/articles/2024/is-israel-committing-genocide-in-gaza/
        https://www.amnesty.org.uk/press-releases/israelopt-fresh-evidence-genocide-satellite-imagery-reveals-total-razing-khuzaa

      106. Middle East Eye – like the BBC and Guardian British rags – promotes anti-Israel propaganda. Like yourself it makes broad declarations: “A growing number of the world’s leading genocide scholars”, but brings no specific identified people whose opinions and reputations others can verify. Right up your alley – fool.

        [[[ Professor Ugur Umit Ungor of the University of Amsterdam and NIOD Institute for War, Holocaust and Genocide Studies said that while there are certainly researchers who say it is not genocide, “I don’t know them”. ]]] Adil Haque – A professor of international law at Rutgers University, Haque has noted that while South Africa’s claims may be plausible at this stage, proving genocide is a much higher legal bar. He emphasizes the complexity of establishing genocidal intent and the challenges in the legal framework surrounding such accusations. Alan Dershowitz – A prominent legal scholar and professor emeritus at Harvard Law School, Dershowitz has been vocal in defending Israel’s actions and has criticized the application of the term “genocide” in this context, arguing that it mischaracterizes the situation.
        Eugene Kontorovich – A law professor at George Mason University and a scholar of international law, Kontorovich has argued that the legal definitions of genocide do not apply to the actions taken during the conflict, emphasizing the need for a clear understanding of intent and context.
        David Bernstein – A law professor at George Mason University and a legal commentator, Bernstein has critiqued the use of the term “genocide” in political discourse, suggesting that it undermines the seriousness of actual genocides. Michael Walzer – A political theorist and professor emeritus at the Institute for Advanced Study, Walzer has discussed the complexities of moral and legal definitions in conflict situations, often emphasizing the importance of context over labels like “genocide.”
        Richard Falk – A former UN Special Rapporteur on Palestinian human rights, Falk has critiqued the use of the term “genocide” in various contexts, arguing for a more nuanced understanding of the situation rather than a blanket label.

        Your shallow and hollow first source proves decisively in my mind that your full of shit.

      107. Coward pig address the evidence brought against you personally. You cannot admit your GUILT and in the same breath condemn Israel.

      108. Don’t be so stupid. I am not guilty of anything. I have not committed nor supported acts of violence. I thoroughly condemn the horrible acts committed by the British in the past. I am not guilty of them. They were done by the ruling class here – a bunch of elitist bastards who suppressed working people here. It is you who is making excuses for the deplorable genocide committed right now by your government.

      109. Sack of shit, your not Jewish. Your not Israeli. This aint your war. Your people did not suffer slaughter and torture on Oct 7th 2023. You don’t give two hoots & a shit concerning the Israeli stolen hostages taken by Ham-ass. YOUR opinion does not = nothing other than shit.

      110. If your great grandmother stole a bar of soap when she was a teenager I would not hold you responsible.

      114. Racism is when you describe a whole race as vermin – just like the Jews were described in history – wrong wrong wrong!!

      120. The German public were in denial about the Nazi genocide project against the Jews.
        You are in denial about the genocide your government is perpetrating against the Palestinian civilian population.
        You should read about it and see the terrible pictures and footage coming out of Gaza – starving children, wounded and dead, rubble. It’s an atrocity.
        You are defending genocide and war crimes. You should be ashamed. It is bringing the whole Jewish people into disrepute – to be reviled by the world (apart from far-right Nazis like Trump).
        https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/top-genocide-scholars-unanimous-israel-committing-genocide-gaza-investigation-finds
        https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2024/11/un-special-committee-finds-israels-warfare-methods-gaza-consistent-genocide
        https://www.ecchr.eu/fileadmin/Q_As/ECCHR_Q_A__Gaza_and_Genocide_20241210.pdfhttps://news.un.org/en/story/2024/03/1147976
        https://www.bu.edu/articles/2024/is-israel-committing-genocide-in-gaza/
        https://www.amnesty.org.uk/press-releases/israelopt-fresh-evidence-genocide-satellite-imagery-reveals-total-razing-khuzaa

      122. Marco Rubio Sanctions ICC Judges After They Target U.S. and Israel in Explosive Rulings

        In a sweeping move, Senator Marco Rubio announced sanctions against four International Criminal Court justices.
        ________________________________________
        ________________________________________

        Marco Rubio’s sanctions on ICC judges—in response to politically driven rulings targeting the U.S. and Israel—represent the first serious American pushback against the expanding overreach of international legal institutions. But these sanctions merely scratch the surface. If Israel were to bomb the International Criminal Court in The Hague for the crime of judicial overreach, it would unleash a shockwave through the foundations of the post-WWII European imperial legal order.

        Such an act would shatter the illusion that the Rome Statute and its court represent binding global authority. In truth, the ICC is a political weapon wielded disproportionately against Western democracies and their allies, while shielding rogue regimes. Its authority rests on consensus, not enforcement. The Rome Treaty would be exposed as not worth the paper it’s written on.

        Europe forfeited its moral right to judge the Jewish people the moment it orchestrated the Shoah. Any European claim to universal justice—especially when applied selectively against the Jewish state—is hypocrisy cloaked in humanitarianism. The ICC’s rulings against Israel are not about war crimes; they are ritual acts of expiation for Europe’s own genocidal guilt. But that guilt is not Israel’s burden to carry. To bomb the ICC would be to formally reject Europe’s post-Nazi pretensions to legal supremacy and declare: “You have no right to judge us.”

        Bombing the ICC would have the same historical effect as the 1956 Suez Crisis: the end of European claims to independent geopolitical authority. Just as France and the UK’s failed bid to reclaim the Suez Canal revealed their imperial impotence, an Israeli destruction of the ICC would reveal the EU’s inability to project legal-moral power beyond its own borders.

        What the EU has is not law, but a narrative infrastructure—paper treaties, postmodern guilt, and international NGOs wielding legal language as a substitute for lost religious and imperial confidence.

        A targeted Israeli strike on the ICC would not trigger war. It would trigger disbelief, followed by narrative collapse, and finally a global reckoning with Western legal hypocrisy. The EU would be faced with the question: do we escalate to save face—or submit to an Israeli dictate which radically limits the EU authority in the balance of power in the Middle East and in Europe.

        If Israel bombed the Court of the Hague for the crime of judicial over-reach. This would set a precedent that the establishment of the ICC through the Rome Treaty – not worth the paper the Rome Treaty written upon. Widespread EU condemnations Big Deal. England and France have already broken off diplomatic relations with Israel.

        The Trump Government in Washington most likely would support Israel if Israel bombed the Court of the Hague for judicial over-reach. The Rome Treaty established Court would most likely dissolve. It would most definitely challenge the judicial jurisdiction of a European Court over Israel!

        Post Shoah Europe lost its rights to judge Jews. The destruction of the Pie in the Sky Rome Treaty would establish a major political precedent that European imperialism stops at the borders of the EU member states alone.

        The assertion that bombing the ICC in The Hague would lead to a collapse of the EU’s prestige is a strong viewpoint that reflects significant concerns about the authority and effectiveness of international institutions.

        If a member state or a country with significant geopolitical influence, like Israel, were to attack an international institution such as the ICC, it could be perceived as a direct challenge to the authority of not only the ICC but also the broader framework of international law that the EU supports.

        In short: bombing the Court of the Hague would radically change the balance of power in Europe. For the first time since the Muslim invasion of Western Europe a major disruption of European political autonomy would result.

        The EU would either put up or shut up: either they would declare War against Israel or not. The Nato alliance, if the US backed Israel would unquestionably collapse. The EU’s credibility as a defender of international law would cease to exist – gone like a puff of smoke. Israel would have called the bluff of the EU, like as if bombing the ICC compares to a hand of stud poker! This could lead to a more fragmented international order, challenging the EU’s role as a global actor.

        An attack on the ICC could set a precedent that undermines the enforcement of international law, leading to a situation where states feel empowered to act unilaterally without regard for international institutions.

        The incident could complicate diplomatic relations not only between Israel and the EU but also between other countries and international organizations. It could lead to a reevaluation of how states engage with international legal frameworks.

        The UN itself would most likely collapse like as did the League of Nations. If nothing else, the historical relationship between Europe and Israel, particularly in the context of the Shoah and post-war UN attempt to compare Israel to the European Nazi crimes against humanity, adds layers of complexity to this European projectionism of its own Nazi guilt and the moral bankruptcy of both Western and Eastern Roman church moral authority over European civilizations.

        The implications of such an act would resonate deeply within the historical narrative of European-Jewish relations and radically shift the narrative reversing the role of Jews as dominant and the church as dhimmi slaves – utterly rejected and despised.

        The entire European security architecture is underwritten by the United States, both financially and militarily. Without U.S. backing, NATO becomes functionally hollow. France and the UK retain nuclear capability, but their conventional power is insufficient to act independently against a U.S.-aligned state like Israel.

        No EU state would risk confrontation with the U.S., their most vital ally, over a non-NATO event like an Israeli action against the ICC. EU states are deeply post-military in culture. Their battlefield is law, narrative, and diplomacy—not armed force.

        Even in the face of Russian invasion (Ukraine), EU states have limited direct engagement, preferring economic sanctions, legal resolutions, and humanitarian aid. Against Israel, the EU’s instinct would be: denounce, sanction, isolate—not mobilize or fight.

        Much of EU condemnation of Israel is a projection of its own unresolved guilt over colonialism and the Holocaust. This moral outrage stops at the threshold of real cost. That’s why you see relentless UN resolutions, ICC motions, and media warfare—but not realpolitik confrontation. Israel calling their bluff—if the U.S. holds firm—exposes their impotence. If Israel bombed the ICC in the Hague – No War. No boots. No tanks. NO Article 5 Nato involvement. The collapse of Nato as an alliance.

        Symbolic institutions (like the ICC) to claim moral authority—but has no spine when force or geopolitical will counters that narrative. If Israel, backed by a U.S. administration, were to shatter a legal myth like the ICC’s authority … No war, but rather most likely the total collapse of EU imperialist Post WWII illusion of legal hegemony on par with England and France failure to capture and seize the Suez canal in the 1956 War. It would clearly reset the terms of European involvement in global legal power.

      130. Who is they? Silly illiterate dumbass. Covered by laws! Imposed by whom exactly? YOU stinking dead fish rotting under the Summer Sun.

      132. No dumb ass, you post your so called “international laws”. Idiot international laws apply to ships sailing in International waters! Like the British impressment of US sailors on the High Seas which resulted in the War of 1812. You vile stupid dumb ass idiot.

      134. Coward, you stick to your dumb ass “International Laws” with no physical evidence. Why? No actual physical evidence other than your racist slander. Vile pig.

      137. Marco Rubio Sanctions ICC Judges After They Target U.S. and Israel in Explosive Rulings

        In a sweeping move, Senator Marco Rubio announced sanctions against four International Criminal Court justices.
        ________________________________________
        ________________________________________

        Marco Rubio’s sanctions on ICC judges—in response to politically driven rulings targeting the U.S. and Israel—represent the first serious American pushback against the expanding overreach of international legal institutions. But these sanctions merely scratch the surface. If Israel were to bomb the International Criminal Court in The Hague for the crime of judicial overreach, it would unleash a shockwave through the foundations of the post-WWII European imperial legal order.

        Such an act would shatter the illusion that the Rome Statute and its court represent binding global authority. In truth, the ICC is a political weapon wielded disproportionately against Western democracies and their allies, while shielding rogue regimes. Its authority rests on consensus, not enforcement. The Rome Treaty would be exposed as not worth the paper it’s written on.

        Europe forfeited its moral right to judge the Jewish people the moment it orchestrated the Shoah. Any European claim to universal justice—especially when applied selectively against the Jewish state—is hypocrisy cloaked in humanitarianism. The ICC’s rulings against Israel are not about war crimes; they are ritual acts of expiation for Europe’s own genocidal guilt. But that guilt is not Israel’s burden to carry. To bomb the ICC would be to formally reject Europe’s post-Nazi pretensions to legal supremacy and declare: “You have no right to judge us.”

        Bombing the ICC would have the same historical effect as the 1956 Suez Crisis: the end of European claims to independent geopolitical authority. Just as France and the UK’s failed bid to reclaim the Suez Canal revealed their imperial impotence, an Israeli destruction of the ICC would reveal the EU’s inability to project legal-moral power beyond its own borders.

        What the EU has is not law, but a narrative infrastructure—paper treaties, postmodern guilt, and international NGOs wielding legal language as a substitute for lost religious and imperial confidence.

        A targeted Israeli strike on the ICC would not trigger war. It would trigger disbelief, followed by narrative collapse, and finally a global reckoning with Western legal hypocrisy. The EU would be faced with the question: do we escalate to save face—or submit to an Israeli dictate which radically limits the EU authority in the balance of power in the Middle East and in Europe.

        If Israel bombed the Court of the Hague for the crime of judicial over-reach. This would set a precedent that the establishment of the ICC through the Rome Treaty – not worth the paper the Rome Treaty written upon. Widespread EU condemnations Big Deal. England and France have already broken off diplomatic relations with Israel.

        The Trump Government in Washington most likely would support Israel if Israel bombed the Court of the Hague for judicial over-reach. The Rome Treaty established Court would most likely dissolve. It would most definitely challenge the judicial jurisdiction of a European Court over Israel!

        Post Shoah Europe lost its rights to judge Jews. The destruction of the Pie in the Sky Rome Treaty would establish a major political precedent that European imperialism stops at the borders of the EU member states alone.

        The assertion that bombing the ICC in The Hague would lead to a collapse of the EU’s prestige is a strong viewpoint that reflects significant concerns about the authority and effectiveness of international institutions.

        If a member state or a country with significant geopolitical influence, like Israel, were to attack an international institution such as the ICC, it could be perceived as a direct challenge to the authority of not only the ICC but also the broader framework of international law that the EU supports.

        In short: bombing the Court of the Hague would radically change the balance of power in Europe. For the first time since the Muslim invasion of Western Europe a major disruption of European political autonomy would result.

        The EU would either put up or shut up: either they would declare War against Israel or not. The Nato alliance, if the US backed Israel would unquestionably collapse. The EU’s credibility as a defender of international law would cease to exist – gone like a puff of smoke. Israel would have called the bluff of the EU, like as if bombing the ICC compares to a hand of stud poker! This could lead to a more fragmented international order, challenging the EU’s role as a global actor.

        An attack on the ICC could set a precedent that undermines the enforcement of international law, leading to a situation where states feel empowered to act unilaterally without regard for international institutions.

        The incident could complicate diplomatic relations not only between Israel and the EU but also between other countries and international organizations. It could lead to a reevaluation of how states engage with international legal frameworks.

        The UN itself would most likely collapse like as did the League of Nations. If nothing else, the historical relationship between Europe and Israel, particularly in the context of the Shoah and post-war UN attempt to compare Israel to the European Nazi crimes against humanity, adds layers of complexity to this European projectionism of its own Nazi guilt and the moral bankruptcy of both Western and Eastern Roman church moral authority over European civilizations.

        The implications of such an act would resonate deeply within the historical narrative of European-Jewish relations and radically shift the narrative reversing the role of Jews as dominant and the church as dhimmi slaves – utterly rejected and despised.

        The entire European security architecture is underwritten by the United States, both financially and militarily. Without U.S. backing, NATO becomes functionally hollow. France and the UK retain nuclear capability, but their conventional power is insufficient to act independently against a U.S.-aligned state like Israel.

        No EU state would risk confrontation with the U.S., their most vital ally, over a non-NATO event like an Israeli action against the ICC. EU states are deeply post-military in culture. Their battlefield is law, narrative, and diplomacy—not armed force.

        Even in the face of Russian invasion (Ukraine), EU states have limited direct engagement, preferring economic sanctions, legal resolutions, and humanitarian aid. Against Israel, the EU’s instinct would be: denounce, sanction, isolate—not mobilize or fight.

        Much of EU condemnation of Israel is a projection of its own unresolved guilt over colonialism and the Holocaust. This moral outrage stops at the threshold of real cost. That’s why you see relentless UN resolutions, ICC motions, and media warfare—but not realpolitik confrontation. Israel calling their bluff—if the U.S. holds firm—exposes their impotence. If Israel bombed the ICC in the Hague – No War. No boots. No tanks. NO Article 5 Nato involvement. The collapse of Nato as an alliance.

        Symbolic institutions (like the ICC) to claim moral authority—but has no spine when force or geopolitical will counters that narrative. If Israel, backed by a U.S. administration, were to shatter a legal myth like the ICC’s authority … No war, but rather most likely the total collapse of EU imperialist Post WWII illusion of legal hegemony on par with England and France failure to capture and seize the Suez canal in the 1956 War. It would clearly reset the terms of European involvement in global legal power.

      139. Moron your addiction to finger pointing reminds me of my first grade youth: I’m rubber and you’re glue, bonces of me and sticks on you.

      142. Protestant “dogmatism” redresses Catholic “dogmatism”. Both tits on a boar hog useless.

        C.S. Lewis’s “The Great Divorce” – a narrative that presents a fictional journey from a gray, dreary town (representing Hell through this metaphor) to a vibrant, beautiful heaven, where the characters confront their own choices and the nature of their desires. On par with the Aslan lion metaphor which depicts the Easter resurrection from the dead story.

        The “Great Divorce” theme focuses upon pride. Many of the characters in this metaphor cling to their “sins”. A guilt trip that dates back to the apostle Pauls’ “Original Sin” narishkeit. A lot of Goyim reject the NT guilt trip ideology. The entire Xtian theology of Heaven and Hell, pie in the sky religious theological speculations. The Talmud teaches a person who speculates on matters which the Human mind cannot conceive or grasp … better that such persons’ never born.

        To make literal declarations like “All in hell want to be there”, simply perverting a children story as depicting actual reality – what complete and utter nonsense! The theological creed Xtian belief systems qualify as examples of the metaphor story of residents of hell who made conscious choices that reflect their fervent beliefs in some pie in the sky Nicene theology of the Trinity.

        Torah has no concept of “Free Will” as Calvin solemnly declared. John Calvin’s “dogma” of Free Will emphasizes the sovereignty of some undefined god. His theology promotes the notion that this undefined Universal god has predetermined who will be saved and who will be damned. This perverse dogmatism defines the key component of Reformed Protestant theology.

        However, Calvin did acknowledge the concept of human responsibility and moral choice within the framework of his Universal god’s sovereignty. Mighty White of him to grant his Universal god these powers; such as grace – essential for salvation.

        Interesting – Moshe’s Torah and the Oral Torah-Talmud defines the middah of grace as the dedication – through swearing a Torah oath – of some unspecified tohor middah, as the k’vanna of the tohor midda of Grace. For example the tohor middah of mercy which learns from the commandment to obliterate every man woman and child of Canaan, or to the commandment to slaughter the youth – stubborn and rebellious son, or the commandment to make eternal war upon the assimilated mix multitude of Jews who lack fear of Elohim, known as Amalek. Commonly known today as antisemitism etc. Clearly Calvin’s Protestant dogmatism, like Catholic dogmatism, upon this foundation stands the theology espoused by C.S. Lewis likewise rejects Oral Torah common law precedents, some of which – listed above, as the means to interpret the k’vanna of both tohor middot of grace and mercy!

      147. Two Classic Examples of how Xtianity remains a dead religion on par with the Gods of Mt. Olympus.

        Jim Zwinglius Redivivus
        Jim·zwingliusredivivus.wordpress.com

        Remembering Prof. dr. W. van ’t Spijker
        Prof. dr. W. van ’t Spijker died on Friday, July 23, 2021. You can read his obituary here. If you aren’t familiar with him, he was a scholar of the Reformation. And a very, very goo…
        _____________________________________
        _____________________________________

        Theological Complicity in State Violence

        Calvinism and Lutheranism Compared: Prof. Dr. Willem van ‘t Spijker (1926–2021), a leading Dutch Calvinist theologian, made substantial contributions to church history, ecclesiastical law, and the development of Reformed theology. Yet his work conspicuously failed to grapple with one of the most catastrophic consequences of the Protestant Reformation: The Thirty Years’ War (1618–1648).

        At the heart of Reformed theology lies the doctrine of predestination—the belief that God has foreordained all events, including salvation and damnation. This framework fostered a militant providentialism: war was interpreted as a divine tool, victory as confirmation of righteousness, and suffering as sanctification; terror Islam sanctifies its martyrs this very day. Such logic fueled the religious zealotry of Protestant-Catholic conflicts in early modern Europe and sacralized political violence. Calvinist theologians, including van ‘t Spijker, largely failed to confront the theological and moral implications of their tradition’s role in igniting and escalating such brutal barbaric bloodshed.

        This blind spot extended far beyond the Reformation. A similar theological detachment reemerged during the Nazi era, when much of Protestant Europe—especially the Lutheran Church in Germany—collapsed morally in the face of totalitarianism and genocide. The result was catastrophic: 75% of Western European Jewry and 63% of European and Russian Jews were annihilated. Churches failed to resist—and in many cases collaborated with—Nazism, cloaking their cowardice or complicity in theological rationalizations of “obedience” and “providence.”

        Van ‘t Spijker’s silence on these historical-theological intersections utterly emblematic of a much broader failure within Reformed scholarship: the inability to reckon with how doctrinal systems, when left unchallenged, enable state violence. Without such critical introspection, the Reformed tradition risks perpetuating a theology disconnected from its own ethical consequences.

        Both Calvinist and Lutheran systems share foundational errors that—when unchecked—open the door to theological barbarism. In Calvinist thought, God’s sovereign will is absolute; every event, from salvation to catastrophe, is predetermined. During the Thirty Years’ War, this led to a dangerous fusion of theology and politics: military victory was seen as a sign of divine favor, while political violence became a “righteous” necessity. Calvinist churches, despite their strong synodal structures, proved unable—or unwilling—to restrain theological alliances with princely power. This alignment justified widespread bloodshed, famine, and forced displacement as sacred duty.

        Martin Luther’s “Two Kingdoms” doctrine separated the spiritual and political realms, teaching that secular rulers are divinely appointed and must not be resisted. By the 20th century, this was transformed into an ideological bludgeon by the German Christian movement, which fused Lutheranism with Nazism. Clergy upheld obedience even as the state descended into genocide. Though the Barmen Declaration (1934), led by Karl Barth, attempted to resist this theological capitulation, the Confessing Church remained a marginalized minority. The institutional Lutheran Church stood largely silent—or worse, supportive—as the Nazis murdered millions, including the overwhelming majority of European Jewry.

        Calvinism, with its emphasis on God’s glory and man’s depravity, lacked a theology of inherent human dignity. Jews, Catholics, and heretics were viewed as reprobates—predestined for damnation, beyond grace, justice, or mercy. This theological posture helped normalize righteous violence against those outside the “elect.”

        Lutheran theology was even more explicit. Luther’s own antisemitic writings—On the Jews and Their Lies (1543)—called for synagogue burnings and expulsion. These ideas laid the groundwork for Christian racial antisemitism. The Nazi vision of the Jew drew directly from centuries of Lutheran contempt and theological supersessionism: the idea that Christianity had replaced Israel as God’s chosen; where Jesus as the son of God replace the oath brit sworn to Avraham, Yitzak, and Yaacov that they would father the chosen Cohen people.

        Therefore, in both cases, the churches failed to resist tyranny not only because of fear—but because their theological systems lacked a mechanism to challenge it from within. In the end, the failure of both Reformed traditions was not merely a failure of courage—but a failure of theological architecture. Their systems lacked internal mechanisms—legal, moral, or interpretive—to challenge tyranny from within. When state violence aligned itself with religious rhetoric, these traditions were intellectually disarmed.

        Whereas Jewish tradition sustains a culture of legal argumentation, known as משנה תורה/Legislative Review; grounded in the courtroom common law which stands upon prior judical precedent courtroom rulings. European courts lack the power to overrule the State. A critical flaw that NT theology, in all its many forms or formats, has totally failed to address. Neither Christianity nor Islam has the cultural tradition of judicial “prophets”.

        Both “daughter religions” define prophesy as – foretelling the future. The Torah views this interpretation as Av tuma witchcraft. According to the Torah prophets command mussar. How does mussar define prophesy? Mussar applies equally across the board to all generations of the chosen Cohen people. Only the chosen Cohen people received and accepted the Torah revelation at Sinai and Horev.

        Both Christian and Muslim theological creed belief systems emphatically embrace a theology of Monotheism. Alas monotheism violates the 2nd Sinai commandment. Only Israel accepted the Torah at Sinai. Therefore the God of the chosen Cohen people a local tribal God and not a Universal God as Christian and Islamic theology dictates to its believers.

        In the end, the failure of both Reformed and Lutheran traditions was not merely a lack of courage, but a failure of theological design. These systems lacked the internal instruments—legal, prophetic, interpretive—needed to resist tyranny when it arose cloaked in religious language.

      152. C.S. Lewis’s “God in the Dock”, published in 1970, does not specifically address the Holocaust (often referred to as the Shoah) or the guilt associated with it in the context of Xtianity. This omission can be seen as a significant gap, especially given the profound moral and theological implications of the Holocaust for both Jewish and Xtian communities. “By their fruits you shall know them” forever condemns Xtianity as a dead religion.

        Philosophical and theological arguments for the existence of God, the nature of faith, and moral reasoning which ignore “By their fruits your shall know them” exposes Xtian religious propaganda rhetoric. “Nature of faith” which ignores צדק צדק תרדוף likewise exposes empty Xtian religious rhetoric propaganda. “Moral reasoning” pales in the “Final Solution”/White Paper\Allied refusal to bomb the rail-lines which transported Jews to death camps. Lewis’s contributions to Xtian apologetics, compares to tits on a boar hog.

        The historical context of the Shoah, by itself alone, challenges the credibility of Xtian teachings such as Luther’s council to gather Jews into their synagogues and burn the buildings upon them. Or the pre-Reformation decision to impose ghetto gulags upon all Jews living in Western Europe. The biblical phrase “צדק צדק תרדוף” (Justice, justice shall you pursue), underscores the expectation that faith should manifest in actions that promote justice and protect the vulnerable. The failure to uphold these principles in the face of systemic evil raises critical questions about the authenticity of faith.

      155. https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=4cde3a26f5e1d93431fa1ce3aadfb1d15efdbfcf515bb019503ed4471dde98b3JmltdHM9MTc1Mjc5NjgwMA&ptn=3&ver=2&hsh=4&fclid=163dad13-4f2e-6600-3002-bed34e096757&psq=international+laws+on+war&u=a1aHR0cHM6Ly9lbi53aWtpcGVkaWEub3JnL3dpa2kvTGF3X29mX3dhcg&ntb=1

      160. You suck Trumps dick? How do you know the size of the President’s dick unless you treat President Trump like Clinton treated young girls.

      161. Trump is a convicted sex pest, a rapist and known paedophile best mate of Epstein. Read what Stormy Daniels said about his dick.

      162. Idiot. The statement you provided contains a mix of allegations and opinions no different than everything you ever write. As of now, Donald Trump has not been convicted of any crime related to sexual misconduct. However, he has faced numerous allegations of sexual misconduct from various individuals over the years. Trump has been accused of sexual assault by several women, but he has denied these allegations. No criminal charges have been brought against him in relation to these claims.

        There is no evidence to support the claim that Trump is a pedophile. This is a serious accusation that requires substantial evidence, the very thing which I have repeatedly pointed out your corrupt bias crud declarations concerning Israel. Dog go back and eat more of your vomit.

        Trump and Jeffrey Epstein were known to have socialized in the past, but Trump has stated that he was not close friends with Epstein and has condemned his actions. Epstein was a convicted sex offender, and his connections with various high-profile individuals have been scrutinized. Stormy Daniels, an adult porn star film actress, has made various statements about her alleged affair with Trump, including comments about his anatomy. These statements have been widely reported but are often viewed through a lens of sensationalism.

      163. Oh yes he has!
        In November 2022, Carroll filed a suit against Trump for battery under the Adult Survivors Act. On May 9, 2023, a New York jury in a civil case found Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation against Carroll, but found him not liable for rape. They awarded Carroll US$5 million in damages.[18] In July 2023, Judge Kaplan stated that the jury had found that Trump had raped Carroll according to the common definition of the word as they had ruled that Trump had forcibly and nonconsensually penetrated Carroll’s vagina with his fingers.[19] New York state’s definition at the time defined rape as solely nonconsensual penetration of the vagina by a penis.[20] A September 2023 partial summary judgment again found Trump liable for defaming Carroll. On January 26, 2024, Trump was ordered to pay Carroll an additional $83.3 million in damages.[21]

      173. You watch TV like a child and confuse TV “programming” — like as done in “computer programing/brain-washing” with actual research. Pathetic pig.

      174. Av Tuma Temple worship avoda zara replacement theology, duplicates the sin of the Golden Calf – replacement theology – where ערב רב רשעים בני עמלק attempted to substitute for the 1st Commandment שם השם לשמה with the word translation – אלהים. Therefore the Torah commands the mitzva to uproot the memory of עמלק from the world; this commandment of the tohor middah of רחום, refers to the weak and morally exhausted ערב רב, whom עמלק attacked – which originally came out of Egyptian bondage in the days of Moshe and Aaron – as a people who have no fear of אלהים.

        The sin of the Golden Calf, this Av tuma substitute theology, defines all other Av tuma avoda zara as the definition of the prohibition which the 2nd Sinai commandment commands. Avoda zara, it most essentially spins around the central axis of assimilated and intermarried Jews, throughout the generations. Its this “exact” ערב רב, which has no fear of אלהים — the name that the original ערב רב, that that generation named the Av tuma golden calf abomination — אלו אלהים שיצאו ‘וכו. This curse of Av tuma avoda zarah explains the mitza: to war against Amalek/antisemitism, caused by Jewish assimilation and intermarriage throughout all the generation which the Jewish walk the face of this Earth.

        The first, but most definitely not the last; the original “replacement theology” where ערב רב רשעים בני עמלק assimilated and intermarried Jews attempt again and again and again and again etc., to substitute for the 1st Commandment שם השם לשמה with the word אלהים, or Jesus or Allah god substitute Word-names. Therefore the Torah in the specific mitzva to uproot the memory of עמלק from the world, its k’vanna to do this tohor time-oriented positive commandment, refers to the weak ערב רב assimilated and intermarried Jews whom עמלק originally attacked when Moshe and Aaron first brought Israel out of Egyptian bondage – its this ערב רב which – as a people – has no fear of אלהים.

        The sin of the Golden Calf, the substitute theology of this Av tuma definition of all avoda zarah prohibitions as defined and framed by the 2nd Sinai commandment mandate, which spins around the central axis of assimilated and intermarried Jews, throughout the generations, that this ערב רב, has no fear of אלהים — the name they originally named their Av tuma Golden Calf abomination — אלו אלהים שיצאו ‘וכו. This Torah curse, this Av tuma avoda zarah – it explains the mitza: to war against Amalek/antisemitism, caused by Jewish assimilation and intermarriage –throughout all the generations that Jews walk the face of this Earth.

        YAHRZEITS — JULY, 2025

        RAM’S HORN POLICY FOR LISTING YAHRZEIT MEMORIALS:!
        Yahrzeit memorials are listed by consecutive Gregorian month, date, and year, if known

        Rejoicing in the month of Av. The burning and destruction of the two Av tuma avoda zarah Temples responsible for the ירידות הדורות ripple – domino effect – upon all down stream generations. Closing in on Chag ט באב. Hey Yea the witch is dead! Kick the רשע king Shlomo in his Head; together with Herod’s Temple abomination that too and likewise offered barbeques unto Heaven. Rather than judicial Sanhedrin common law courtroom justice or ‘Legislative Review’/משנה תורה as the meaning and definition of the k’vanna of the commandment of king David which commanded as his last will and testament for his son Shlomo — the fool, which the Book of מלכים satires by referring to him as the ‘wisest of all men’ tongue in cheek mockery, to build the בית המקדש.

        The Aitz Chaim Ram’s Horn

        Joy Breslauer·aitzchaim.com·16m ago

        YAHRZEITS — JULY, 2025

        RAM’S HORN POLICY FOR LISTING YAHRZEIT MEMORIALS:!
        Yahrzeit memorials are listed by consecutive Gregorian month, date, and year, if known

        Rejoicing in the month of Av. The burning and destruction of the two Av tuma avoda zarah Temples responsible for the ירידות הדורות ripple – domino effect upon all down stream generations. Closing in on Chag ט באב. Whooooooooooooooooooooooooop. Dance and sing and cast stones upon the graves of king Shlomo and the Rambam! The latter too and likewise triggered an Av tuma ירידות הדורות ‘ripple-domino effect’ upon down stream generations of Yiddishkeit when his switch N’ bait exchanged T’NaCH mussar & Talmudic halacha common law legal systems with Greek & Roman culture/styles of Statute law which organizes law into subject matter, much like a dozon of eggs sold in cardboard egg-crates! This רשע imposed Greek logic the 3 part Aristotle syllogism model of deductive logic in the place of rabbi Akiva’s פרדס four part inductive reasoning process.

        The Talmud breaks down into a warp/weft Halachic\Aggadic loom like “fabric” which shapes and determines the culture and customs of the chosen Cohen people of Avraham Yitzak and Yaacov. The ירידות הדורות ripple-domino effect of the Rambam Civil War, remember Hanukkah and the Civil War between the Tzeddukim against the P’rushim, blew out the Hanukkah Lights! An eternal ט’ באב אב טומא עבודה זרה abomination. Greek deductive logic not the same as the kabbalah taught by Rabbi Akiva who fought the Romans and died לשמה with the oath of the Avot the tefillah דאורייתא of kre’a shma – his dying spirit.

        Rambam, both his statute law assimilated code and his Guide for the Perplexed which expressly and openly promoted Greek logic over the kabbalah taught by rabbi Akiva through both the Mishna and the Gemara which make up the Talmud Bavli and Yerushalmi; together with the Midrash commentary to the Aggada composed by the Gaonim scholars which pre-dated the Reshonim! Rabbeinu Tam’s commentary on the Talmud criticized the Rashi commentary for its lack of emphasis upon the priority of learning the Talmud as common law. Learning off the dof to a different Mesechta of Gemara compares to reading a blue print based upon a different perspective of the same exact blue-print which has no less than 3 primary perspectives. The Talmud has 70 faces to the Torah!

        The term משנה תורה which the Rambam code converted to a Catholic priest, means common law — not statute law! Just as Rabbeinu Tam criticized the error made by Rashi of not prioritizing the critical and essential importance of studying Talmud – together with T’NaCH prophetic mussar through Aggadic & Midrashic common law precedents – so too the commentary made by the Baali Tosofot, specifically Rabbeinu Tam, failed to prioritize making a משנה תורה upon the language of the Mishna itself; the Baali Tosafot commentary limited its משנה תורה/Legislative Review only to reviewing the sugya of Gemara viewed from an off the dof different perspective of the גזר שוה. But dismally failed to likewise make a משנה תורה re-interpretation of the k’vanna of the language of the Mishna – viewed from a completely different perspective.

        All the Reshonim scholars open to honest criticism. The B’HaG, Rif and Rosh common law codes failed to emphasize employing halacha from the Gemara as a משנה תורה בנין אב to re-investigate the intent of the language of the Mishna based upon the different halachic different perspectives! The wisdom of reading a Blue Print requires the integration of Top/Side\Top viewpoints to grasp the 3 dimensional Big Picture idea. So too both T’NaCH and Talmudic common law equally requires a similar type of wisdom. Rote reading of words on the page, does not learn T’NaCH and Talmudic prophetic mussar and halachic common law.

        The study of T’NaCH and Talmud and Midrashim as common law legalism, this scholarship seeks to learn mitzvot commandments not only as positive and negative commandments as the Rambam Sefer HaMitzvot, together with his lackey followers – dictates! These complete fools “believe” that later generations cannot dispute with earlier generations as the meaning of the Talmudic term ירידות הדורות. Bunk, a critical error of Torah scholarship based upon cowardice.

        Rather the study of T’NaCH and Talmudic/Midrashim common law seeks to make an Av tohor הבדלה which separates Shabbat from Chol; which distinguishes Av tohor Time-Oriented commanments from תולדות secondary קום ועשה ושב ולא תעשה commandments which do not require k’vanna. Rote learning limits the Torah to two-dimensional box-thinking wherein Torah mitzvot done robotically and mechanically without any k’vanna what so ever. K’vanna defined in this rebuke as meaning “Prophetic mussar learned from the T’NaCH by means of Aggadic and Midrashic common law sources”! No Yeshiva, post the Rambam Civil War abomination which blew out the Hanukkah Lights and negated the victory of the P’rushim teachers of rabbi Akiva’s פרדס kabbalah of the Oral Torah revelation at Horev … and substituted the Tzeddukim faithlessness which rejects the revelation of the Oral Torah at Horev.

        During the 9 Days Jews have either the choice to mourn the loss of buildings made of wood and stone – comparable to idols. Or absolutely rejoice at the uprooting and total destruction of Av tuma avoda zara ripped from the Yatzir Ha’Rah within the hearts of the chosen Cohen people who worship HaShem through doing tohor Time-oriented mitzvot from both the Torah and the Talmud, like as taught by the B’HaG! It seems to me, especially with Israeli National Independence consequence to the vision of political Zionism of Herzl that the time has come to cast away the black mourning garments of g’lut. And rejoice at the prospect of restoring the Written Torah as the Constitution of our Republic of Tribes/States. Where we make the Talmud serve as the model to restore Federal Sanhedrin common law court rooms which impose Capital Crimes Courts to judge cases of murder, in the primary border-land cities like king David conquering Damascus, stands the obligation to establish a City of Refuge with a Small Sanhedrin Capital Crime common law courtroom. A blessing upon the generations of Israel that we might achieve the destiny of the chosen Cohen people; the seed of Avraham Yitzak and Yaacov as defined by the Torah oath brit alliance.

      187. You don’t attract. You pull fate in.

        Swamigalkodi Astrology©NAVAGRA – A FREE VEDIC HOROSCOPE READING PLACE

        astrological attraction astrology for lovespiritual magnetism fated relationships karmic connection

        You don’t attract. You don’t seek. You wait, and they come. Something in you pulls them. Not your words. Not your eyes. Something beneath that. A soft gravity. A current they can’t see. It moves through your stillness. It hums in your silence. They notice you before you speak. Especially then. You don’t attract. You pull fate in.
        _____________________________________________________
        _____________________________________________________

        Magnetism – lonely (intense connections, but not always reciprocated or understood) and complex (the nature of these connections; both nurturing or challenging, reflecting different aspects of ourselves) to define our own identity as a person, and for others to grasp, appreciate, and understand. None-the-less, magnetism compares to how fire entices insects to fly into the flames.

        Fate: Personal Destiny in a persons life walk-path. Events, relationships, and experiences astrological influences shaped through personal choices within Life’s Big Picture. Attraction – like basic instincts in animals vs. Pulling, a far more profound connection – like family which speaks to the soul. Less a physical allure, it compliments long standing emotional memories. Presence: your design shaped by your astrological chart and life experiences; and Stillness – a quiet, a grounded confidence: ‘safe space’ for others. It does not require words for it to express this ‘safe space’ sweet smelling perfume. Echoes and Memory, refers to something like your future born children. Energies we share can leave a legacy, shaping not only our lives but also the lives of those who come after us. Energy Exchange, a dynamic interaction between individuals. A healthy sharing relationship with trusted friends.

        Astrology and Chinese Taoist thought work in harmony with meditation. Which contrasts the in-haled breath with the exhaled breath. Zen Buddhism refers to the ‘3rd Eye’ as a reference to a focused awareness of the 5 senses “seen” (so to speak) between the eyes during the duration of the inhaled breath. Meditation “feels” the chi expressed within the external reality of living during the duration of the exhaled breath. This meditation seeks to achieve a conscious Mind awareness both internally felt and externally experienced. Hence Taoism has the 5 breath “souls”, in conjuction with the 5 designated feelings – and they all align with the 5 elements of the Universe.

        Unlike Astrology, both Chinese and Japanese healing makes its central focus – awareness of precise meridian points and lines rather that Planets and Stars shining in the Heavens above. The shared common denominator which unites the two contrasting disciplines — meditation. Both disciplines which lack meditation compare to positive and negative Torah commandments which have no tohor time-oriented commandment potential to elevate secondary commandments and halachot unto Av tohor time-oriented commandments from the Torah.

        For example: The so-called daughter religions of Xtianity and Islam – both remain Av tuma avoda zarah examples of the 2nd Sinai Commandment. These religions employ their own separate but unique ‘replacement theologies’, which supplants T’NaCH, Talmud, Midrashim and Siddur – along with the power of Astrology of Planets and Stars – with Creed based belief systems. Such as belief in some pie in the sky Universal God monotheism! This theology employed to supplant T’NaCH, Talmud, Midrashim, and Siddur.

        For example: The Apostle Paul declared Torah commandments like circumcision archaic and invalid. Reform Judaism pulled a similar rabbit out of its hat of magik. The Pauline rhetoric declared that Goyim “not under the Law”; an utterly absurd statement because all societies and civilization require the Order of law and government. Furthermore, the Pauline propaganda, much like Obamo’s 2008 political “CHANGE” declarations made no distinction between T’NaCH & Talmudic judicial common law Legislative Review, which has over-view of all laws passed by Legislatures or Kings; from legal statute law – decrees, issued from some Roman Senate or a Caesar bureaucratic regulatory dictatorship.

        Jewish common law depends upon lateral common law courtrooms rather than Greek political rhetoric which promotes ‘Democracy’. Democracy has no place in T’NaCH and Talmudic lateral common law courtrooms. The people pay for ‘Legal Insurance’ which maintains these common law Courts – when not actively engaged in any legal dispute heard before these common law Courtrooms. The Torah refers to vertical courtrooms as bribery; a Torah abomination for the State to pay the salary of Court Justices and prosecuting attorneys.

        Following the corruption made by the British Star-Courts which legalized British navel impressment of American sailors seized from American ships in High Seas ‘international waters’. The Founding Fathers attempted to address the issue of Judicial bribery by and through the State. They established the lateral jury system. But the otherwise vertical courtrooms, where the State pays the salaries of the Judges and Prosecuting Attorneys, American judicial law bi-passed the lateral jury court revolutionary approach, by imposing strict terms which limit the scope of how the jury weighs introduced legal evidence/precedents by the opposing lawyers briefs.

        Lawyers do not present their legal briefs to the Jury. Rather, the vertical courts restrict presentation of these opposing legal briefs, which only the State paid judges can review. Hence while the Founding Fathers attempted to establish lateral courtrooms, later generations corrupted the revolutionary lateral jury judicial system. And replaced it with just another vertical court having bribed Judges and Prosecuting Attorneys.

      192. Marco Rubio Sanctions ICC Judges After They Target U.S. and Israel in Explosive Rulings

        In a sweeping move, Senator Marco Rubio announced sanctions against four International Criminal Court justices.
        ________________________________________
        ________________________________________

        Marco Rubio’s sanctions on ICC judges—in response to politically driven rulings targeting the U.S. and Israel—represent the first serious American pushback against the expanding overreach of international legal institutions. But these sanctions merely scratch the surface. If Israel were to bomb the International Criminal Court in The Hague for the crime of judicial overreach, it would unleash a shockwave through the foundations of the post-WWII European imperial legal order.

        Such an act would shatter the illusion that the Rome Statute and its court represent binding global authority. In truth, the ICC is a political weapon wielded disproportionately against Western democracies and their allies, while shielding rogue regimes. Its authority rests on consensus, not enforcement. The Rome Treaty would be exposed as not worth the paper it’s written on.

        Europe forfeited its moral right to judge the Jewish people the moment it orchestrated the Shoah. Any European claim to universal justice—especially when applied selectively against the Jewish state—is hypocrisy cloaked in humanitarianism. The ICC’s rulings against Israel are not about war crimes; they are ritual acts of expiation for Europe’s own genocidal guilt. But that guilt is not Israel’s burden to carry. To bomb the ICC would be to formally reject Europe’s post-Nazi pretensions to legal supremacy and declare: “You have no right to judge us.”

        Bombing the ICC would have the same historical effect as the 1956 Suez Crisis: the end of European claims to independent geopolitical authority. Just as France and the UK’s failed bid to reclaim the Suez Canal revealed their imperial impotence, an Israeli destruction of the ICC would reveal the EU’s inability to project legal-moral power beyond its own borders.

        What the EU has is not law, but a narrative infrastructure—paper treaties, postmodern guilt, and international NGOs wielding legal language as a substitute for lost religious and imperial confidence.

        A targeted Israeli strike on the ICC would not trigger war. It would trigger disbelief, followed by narrative collapse, and finally a global reckoning with Western legal hypocrisy. The EU would be faced with the question: do we escalate to save face—or submit to an Israeli dictate which radically limits the EU authority in the balance of power in the Middle East and in Europe.

        If Israel bombed the Court of the Hague for the crime of judicial over-reach. This would set a precedent that the establishment of the ICC through the Rome Treaty – not worth the paper the Rome Treaty written upon. Widespread EU condemnations Big Deal. England and France have already broken off diplomatic relations with Israel.

        The Trump Government in Washington most likely would support Israel if Israel bombed the Court of the Hague for judicial over-reach. The Rome Treaty established Court would most likely dissolve. It would most definitely challenge the judicial jurisdiction of a European Court over Israel!

        Post Shoah Europe lost its rights to judge Jews. The destruction of the Pie in the Sky Rome Treaty would establish a major political precedent that European imperialism stops at the borders of the EU member states alone.

        The assertion that bombing the ICC in The Hague would lead to a collapse of the EU’s prestige is a strong viewpoint that reflects significant concerns about the authority and effectiveness of international institutions.

        If a member state or a country with significant geopolitical influence, like Israel, were to attack an international institution such as the ICC, it could be perceived as a direct challenge to the authority of not only the ICC but also the broader framework of international law that the EU supports.

        In short: bombing the Court of the Hague would radically change the balance of power in Europe. For the first time since the Muslim invasion of Western Europe a major disruption of European political autonomy would result.

        The EU would either put up or shut up: either they would declare War against Israel or not. The Nato alliance, if the US backed Israel would unquestionably collapse. The EU’s credibility as a defender of international law would cease to exist – gone like a puff of smoke. Israel would have called the bluff of the EU, like as if bombing the ICC compares to a hand of stud poker! This could lead to a more fragmented international order, challenging the EU’s role as a global actor.

        An attack on the ICC could set a precedent that undermines the enforcement of international law, leading to a situation where states feel empowered to act unilaterally without regard for international institutions.

        The incident could complicate diplomatic relations not only between Israel and the EU but also between other countries and international organizations. It could lead to a reevaluation of how states engage with international legal frameworks.

        The UN itself would most likely collapse like as did the League of Nations. If nothing else, the historical relationship between Europe and Israel, particularly in the context of the Shoah and post-war UN attempt to compare Israel to the European Nazi crimes against humanity, adds layers of complexity to this European projectionism of its own Nazi guilt and the moral bankruptcy of both Western and Eastern Roman church moral authority over European civilizations.

        The implications of such an act would resonate deeply within the historical narrative of European-Jewish relations and radically shift the narrative reversing the role of Jews as dominant and the church as dhimmi slaves – utterly rejected and despised.

        The entire European security architecture is underwritten by the United States, both financially and militarily. Without U.S. backing, NATO becomes functionally hollow. France and the UK retain nuclear capability, but their conventional power is insufficient to act independently against a U.S.-aligned state like Israel.

        No EU state would risk confrontation with the U.S., their most vital ally, over a non-NATO event like an Israeli action against the ICC. EU states are deeply post-military in culture. Their battlefield is law, narrative, and diplomacy—not armed force.

        Even in the face of Russian invasion (Ukraine), EU states have limited direct engagement, preferring economic sanctions, legal resolutions, and humanitarian aid. Against Israel, the EU’s instinct would be: denounce, sanction, isolate—not mobilize or fight.

        Much of EU condemnation of Israel is a projection of its own unresolved guilt over colonialism and the Holocaust. This moral outrage stops at the threshold of real cost. That’s why you see relentless UN resolutions, ICC motions, and media warfare—but not realpolitik confrontation. Israel calling their bluff—if the U.S. holds firm—exposes their impotence. If Israel bombed the ICC in the Hague – No War. No boots. No tanks. NO Article 5 Nato involvement. The collapse of Nato as an alliance.

        Symbolic institutions (like the ICC) to claim moral authority—but has no spine when force or geopolitical will counters that narrative. If Israel, backed by a U.S. administration, were to shatter a legal myth like the ICC’s authority … No war, but rather most likely the total collapse of EU imperialist Post WWII illusion of legal hegemony on par with England and France failure to capture and seize the Suez canal in the 1956 War. It would clearly reset the terms of European involvement in global legal power.

      195. In Jewish thought by stark and absolute total contrast, faith in God not some cult of personality personal or spiritual theological belief system; Torah faith deeply intertwined with ethical prophetic mussar, and social justice. The Torah obligations absolutely require the active pursuit of judicial common law justice through the Sanhedrin courtrooms. Principles of justice and fairness in all dealings, especially in legal matters define the Torah concept of faith.

        The Torah mandates stong emphasis on the appointment of just judges, expected to act with integrity and impartiality. In Deuteronomy 16:18-20, the commandment to appoint judges and officers in all cities underscores the importance of justice: “You shall not pervert justice; you shall not show partiality, and you shall not accept a bribe, for a bribe blinds the eyes of the wise and twists the words of the righteous.” This principle, echoed in the teachings of the sages, who stress that a corrupt judiciary undermines the very foundation of society and the time-oriented brit which forever and eternally creates the chosen Cohen people from nothing. Hezekiah’s actions seen as a common law precedent for Sanhedrin justices to pursue justice and righteousness, ensuring that their governance aligns with the values of the Torah through משנה תורה legislative review of all laws and decrees imposed by Government statute laws.

        The presence of bribed judges and corrupt courtrooms leads to the Torah curse of societal decay and a loss of faith among the people; meaning Jews assimilate and embrace the culture and customs of foreign peoples. These aliens reject the revelation of the Torah at Sinai and Horev. When judicial common law justice collapses, it creates a disconnect between the community and HaShem; failure to do and keep tohor time oriented commandments perverts the chosen cohen nation unto just another Av tuma Goyim people. The “converted” non Cohen-people, abandoned or betrayed by leaders equally abandon their faith – the obligation to pursue judicial justice among and between Jews. The prophetic T’NaCH literature often addresses the consequences of injustice, warning that societal ills can lead to divine judgment – Torah curses – like as happened to Par’o in Egypt in the days of Moshe and Aaron. This serves as a reminder that faith most essentially defined, not as Av tumah avoda zara which demand that a Goy believe in this or that theological creed God, but rather Torah faith lives only through pursuit of judicial common law courtroom judgements that promote justice and equity among and between our conflicting peoples.

        This mussar tradition, it emphasizes the cultivation of personal virtues, including integrity, honesty, and a commitment to justice among our people. Prophetic mussar encourages the active pursuit of judicial common law justice to resolve our damages disputes between our people in all generations and all times. These T’NaCH/aggadic and midrashic teachings, they most essentually stress that true loyalty to the Torah brit faith involves far more than personal religious piety, like as promoted by the Shulkan Aruch. But, for more essential, to pursue an active participation in creating a just society, where the rights of all individuals Jews honor and respect and uphold by validating the rulings of the Sanhedrin common law lateral courtrooms.

        The connection between faith in HaShem and the pursuit of justice, the fundamental theme in Torah thought, which most essentially defines the Torah concept of faith. The example of King Hezekiah, as Moshiach revolves around the rebuke of the prophet Natan to the house of David following the death of the baal of Bat Sheva. The Torah curse of Civil War to plague all generations of the House of David, over his profaning the oath dedication of Moshiach in the matter of the killed husband of Bat Sheva. Loyalty to the Torah Constitution most essentially manifests itself in ethical mussar behavior which remembers the rebuke that the prophet Natan cursed the House of David, specifically in the realm of justice over the criminal death of the baal of Bat Sheva. The integrity of the judicial system, which failed to hold king David to stand trial. Later the Talmud would acquit king David of murder. However, this Talmudic opinion does not change the fact that David, and his son Shlomo failed to establish the authority of the Sanhedrin Federal court system as the definition of building the Temple on Zion.

      200. The German public were in denial about the Nazi genocide project against the Jews.
        You are in denial about the genocide your government is perpetrating against the Palestinian civilian population.
        You should read about it and see the terrible pictures and footage coming out of Gaza – starving children, wounded and dead, rubble. It’s an atrocity.
        You are defending genocide and war crimes. You should be ashamed. It is bringing the whole Jewish people into disrepute – to be reviled by the world (apart from far-right Nazis like Trump).
        https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/top-genocide-scholars-unanimous-israel-committing-genocide-gaza-investigation-finds
        https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2024/11/un-special-committee-finds-israels-warfare-methods-gaza-consistent-genocide
        https://www.ecchr.eu/fileadmin/Q_As/ECCHR_Q_A__Gaza_and_Genocide_20241210.pdfhttps://news.un.org/en/story/2024/03/1147976
        https://www.bu.edu/articles/2024/is-israel-committing-genocide-in-gaza/
        https://www.amnesty.org.uk/press-releases/israelopt-fresh-evidence-genocide-satellite-imagery-reveals-total-razing-khuzaa

      201. You copy and paste … proof you really have nothing to say of substance. This is the 3rd time you have sent the exact identical message. You vile moron.

      207. President Trump pulls down the panties of the Deep State. Obozo and the Press kissing cousin of the Swamp Deep State attempted to arrest and force President Trump to stand trial for a civil offense. Trump seeks the arrest of Obama, Pelosi, Nadler, Schiff, and the Heads of the CIA, FBI, and former States Secretary of State States Secretary of State Rice of the Federal Capital Crimes charge of TREASON. If found guilty by a court of law, all these people the court can put to death by Firing Squad.

      217. No you chase after slander. Had you been alive during the blood libels and ensuing pogroms I am quite sure you would have lead those autracities.

      218. Revenge. You never experienced the pogroms or the holocaust! They do not justify genocide or war crimes.

      222. Hamas were atrocious. What they did was atrocious. The response against civilians is worse! It is also counter productive – more hate more death.

      230. Think about my last article I re-wrote it.

        Its extremely important to publish opposition within the GOP, (screw the DemonCrapic Party and the MSM propaganda press) concerning our President Trump’s well deserved and rejoiced 2nd Administration. Personally, for me, I emotionally support President Trump. Non-the-less, its extremely important to publish GOP and even democratic party opposition.

        Tulsi Gabbard has ‘exaggerated’ and ‘imagined evidence’: John Bolton | On Balance

        Bolten personally expresses opinions hostile toward President Trump. His ignorance revealed during the 12 Day War against Iran. Honestly, I do not respect John Bolton’s criticism.
        John Bolton says Donald Trump can’t come up with ‘coherent’ view on Israel | LBC

        Jason Crow of Colorado, a Democrat Congressman, has voiced opposition to Tulsi Gabbards Russia-Gate Hoax charges.
        Colorado’s Jason Crow comments on being selected to be impeachment manager

        Senator Mark Warner, despises Tulsi Gabbard. Approve and support the service made by Edward Snowden, and support his pardon. The threat of the Ukraine joining NATO caused Russia to invade Ukraine. Russia twice invaded by Napoleon and Hitler through the flat plains of the Ukraine.
        Sh*t That Ain’t True – Mark Warner on Tulsi Gabbard

        The Russian Hoax allegations and the Epstein sex scandal – indeed separate issues, each with its own context and implications. The Russian Hoax allegations primarily revolve around the integrity of the electoral process and potential foreign interference, while the Epstein scandal deals with serious criminal behavior related to sexual exploitation.

        Investigations into the Russian allegations were led by the Mueller Report, which sought to determine the extent of Russian interference and any collusion with the Trump campaign. The Epstein scandal has led to multiple investigations and legal actions against those involved in his network, focusing on accountability for sexual abuse.

        Mark Kelly, a Democratic Senator from Arizona, attempts to equate the Russia-Gate Hoax with the Epstein files. Kelly opposed Gabbard from the get-go.
        Sen. Mark Kelly Raises Red Flags on Tulsi Gabbard’s Nomination: National Security Concerns

        On July 2019 Jeffrey Epstein was arrested on federal charges of sex trafficking minors. His arrest and subsequent “suicide” caused an ongoing scrutiny of the Trump Administration’s ties to Epstein, though not directly linked to Russia-Gate.

        The Trump Administration faced no direct legal pressure related to Epstein until after the Russia-Gate allegations began to unfold! Therefore Mark Kelly employs the Epstein files as a red herring to deflect away from the Watergate Hoax scandal and the ultimate disgrace of the Obama Administration.

        This Red Herring tactic of linking various scandals, a common denominator employed in political rhetoric, aimed at reactionary uneducated television views. Where these Democrapic opponents of President Trump seek to shift their skewed narratives, in order to focus public attention away from embarrassing political disgraces – such as the Russia-Gate Hoax Scandal.

        Jim Himes, another Democrat calls the Russia Hoax accusations – “baseless”. Its important to remember the CNN Fake News reporting 8 years ago.

        Jake Tapper: Trump’s world untethered to facts
        Jake Tapper, his new book, “Original Sin: President Biden’s Decline, Its Cover-Up, and His Disastrous Choice to Run Again,” co-authored with Alex Thompson.

        That book explores the alleged concealment of President Biden’s cognitive decline by his inner circle and the implications of this for his 2024 re-election campaign. Tapper argues that Biden’s aides and family members were aware of his declining health but chose to support his decision to run for re-election, despite concerns about how this would affect his campaign and the Democratic Party.

        CNN has made several programming adjustments, including moving Tapper’s show to a later time and removing other anchors from their positions, but Tapper remains a prominent figure at the network. Jake Tapper remains with CNN and continues to host his show, despite the network’s recent programming which demoted the importance of his shows.

        CNN ratings have never recovered from its rabid hostility and biased news coverage of the first Trump Administration. The MSM socialist Pravda-like propaganda, lead by NBC, CBS, ABC and CNN Fake News, has witnessed a serious decline in earnings and influence.

        The Fake News MSM legacy media promotes to this day a Yellow Journalism that prioritizes copy selling sensationalism over hard copy objective journalism. The expulsion of President Trump from Twitter prior to the 2020 elections inspired Elon Musk to acquire X and fire the vast majority of Twitter parasite slugs. The concealing of the Hunter Biden laptop scandal by the FBI and the MSM press significantly influenced the 2020 Presidential elections.

        The FBI’s involvement in the investigation of the laptop raised concerns about the intersection of law enforcement and political narratives, with critics arguing that it contributed to a lack of accountability in media reporting. Many individuals express frustration with what they perceive as a lack of integrity in journalism, leading to calls for more accountability and a return to objective reporting standards.

        Did Obama and Hillery use false intelligence, the Steele report, to discredit Trump’s election victory? Did senior officials from the FBI and CIA support the Russia interference false alligations? The Epstein scandal has nothing to do with the Russian hoax of 2016. That’s a Red Herring. What “multiple investigations have confirmed Russian interference in the 2016 election? What information has Gabbard “cherry-picked”?

        The Steele Dossier came from the Clinton’s election team. The Democrats employed the false Steele Dossier to open investigations on the Trump team. No question the Steele dossier served as a Democratic attack point used to challenge the Trump ’16 victory.

        The Mueller Report exonerated Trump. You cannot accuse Gabbard of cherry picking information and not bring any evidence of “cherry picked” evidence. That’s another Red Herring.

        Whether the Kremlin sought to influence the ’16 election has absolutely nothing what so ever to do with the Trump election campaign. Cherry-Picking accusations post the 3 plus years of Russia Hoax do not mean squat. Name the evidence. Put up or shut up.

        Fusion GPS supports the Gabbard allegations made against both Obama and Clinton. The Mueller Report based its investigations upon Fusion GPS lies. How does Gabbard “selectively interpret” evidence. Name the evidence. No evidence exists that the Trump election team worked in collusion with Russia.

        The Steele Dossier corrupt from the start, regardless if various unnamed sources implicated in the Clinton hoax scandal. Russian interference in the ’16 elections a Red Herring. It has nothing to do with the Trump team in ’16. Emphasizing A vs. downplaying or ignoring B absolutely requires naming both A and B.

        Vague declarations of how different parties emphasize or downplay aspects of the investigations absolutely require specifics not broad general statements unsupported by factual evidence. That’s propaganda. The Mueller Report did not establish a conspiracy or coordination between the Trump Team and the Russian Government.

        Candidate Clinton utterly disgraced and humiliated. Documented Russian interference efforts has absolutely nothing to do with the Trump team anymore than with the Clinton team. Russia operates independent of both Trump and Clinton. The accusation the Democrats made against Trump following the ’16 elections – a simple Red Herring.

        The Mueller Report with its conclusions that no evidence of conspiracy or coordination between the Trump campaign and Russia starkly contrasts with the political slander which the MSM press lead by Rachel Maddow and Late Night “comedy” shows. That Russia employed social media and hacking, no different than the US doing the exact same thing against Russia and virtually all other countries across the Planet.

        Both Obama and Clinton sought to make a coup against President Trump’s election victory. US spy agencies sow discord in the political systems of Foreign governments. Especially hostile Foreign governments! Social media directly caused the Arab Spring revolutions which caused the Middle East to go into political anarchy and Civil Wars!

        Because the Mueller Report found no evidence of conspiracy or coordination between the Trump campaign and Russia then the “baseless” declarations made by Obama and his supporters which seeks to minimize the damage to the reputations of these treason traitor criminals – the only thing “baseless”.

        Rachel Maddow and other bought and paid for supporters of Obama and Clinton openly employed slander to politically assassinate the Good Name of President Trump and his election team. The Mueller Report conclusions utterly refutes the ’25 Obama and supporters slander and political assassination attempts.

        Did Obama cross the line and order the two assassination attempts made on Candidate Trump prior to the ’24 elections? Does US intelligence spy on the America people through FaceBook and other social media platforms? Obviously, its an undisputed reality that the FBI and CIA and NSA, post the 9/11 Chaney/Bush Patriot Act have operated outside the bounds established by the US Constitution. Bush himself referred to the Constitution as just a GD piece of paper!

        Obama and his allies engaged in slander to undermine Trump’s legitimacy. The narrative that figures like Rachel Maddow and others have engaged in slander against Trump. These subversive media figures have perpetuated a narrative of collusion without sufficient evidence, contributing to a broader campaign to discredit Trump.

        The revelations by whistleblowers, such as Edward Snowden, highlighted the extent of surveillance programs that collect data from social media and other platforms. This has raised significant debates about privacy rights and government overreach. The quote attributed to George W. Bush regarding the Constitution reflects a sentiment among some critics that national security concerns have been prioritized over civil liberties.

        Obama and his allies engaged in slander to undermine Trump’s legitimacy. Rachel Maddow engaged in slander to undermine Trump’s legitimacy.

        Whistleblowers like Edward Snowden revealed extensive surveillance programs that collect data from social media. The debate over the balance between civil liberties and national security, particularly post-9/11, the Obama-Clinton treason have conclusively without a shred of doubt proven.

        The disgraced legacy media with its False News merits total and absolute contempt. The revelations by Edward Snowden brought to light the extent of government surveillance, raising concerns about privacy rights. The collection of data from social media by the FBI, CIA, NSA etc., demands to restrict and radically curtail these utterly corrupt bureaucracies which have no accountability to the voting American people.

      231. I look at the pictures of Trump with Epstein. I read what he says about Epstein and partying with young girls. I see the pay outs (multimillion) that he’s made to underage girls. I read what he says about grabbing pussies and going into the changing rooms at the pageants he ran to see the naked underage girls. I see the court cases there has been about him, rape and sexual assault. I read the testimony of the girls. I have no doubt that he is, like Hugh Hefner (who banned him from the Playboy Club for being a paedophile) said, that he is a predatory paedophile and sex pest.
        I read about the Russian business deals and massive loans and know you don’t get something for nothing. I read about the sex tapes and blackmail. I know the Russians were assisting Trump in the election.
        I read about his business deals, the bankruptcies and the people he’s shafted/. He’s a convicted felon on 34 counts.
        He’s a shyster, a conman, a thief and a sexual predator.
        You believe the propaganda you’re fed. I look for the facts.

      232. You look at pictures. This makes you on par with a child learning how to read. Both cases currently under appeal. Swamp shit head.

      233. I look at lots of pictures of Trump with Epstein, Diddy and other paedophiles. I read the stories.

      245. Not sure what investested means. You’re inventing words now. But Cromwell’s invasion was long ago. We live in a democracy now. Shame that you live in a theocracy.

      247. Human society not flat, nor a טיפש פשט mythology.

        The zionist experiment of democracy faces some criticism by Jews such as myself who favor restoration of a Torah constitutional Republic which mandates a lateral Sanhedrin common law courts to regulate all laws passed by Jerusalem and the state legislatures of the 12 Tribes. Imposing Judicial Legislative Review upon Sanhedrin common law courtrooms with the Mandated Constitutional power to conduct trials which judge Capital Crimes offenses, and impose 4 different types of death penalties, dependent upon the nature of the Capital crimes committed. And equally vital and important דיוק inference to judging Capital Crimes Cases: To judge the leadership responsible for Federal and State governments; based through evidence of laws bureaucratically imposed by government authority officials — viewed through the lenses of prophetic משנה תורה-Legislative Review.

        The prioritization of lateral common law Sanhedrin courtrooms over institutional machinery of governance, which directly includes government leadership positions within these institutions of government, this essential clause defines, separates, and make unique Jewish political science. Faith: the Torah defines as justice justice pursue; a direct reference to lateral Sanhedrin common law courtrooms having the mandate of ‘Legislative Review’ over all governments – Jerusalem or any tribal/state legislature.

        Democracy or democratic institutions not part of the Jewish cultural traditions. Democratic mob rule, a Greek idea and not a Jewish cultural concept. Leaders “anointed” under the pre-condition that they will faithfully pursue justice as the rule of law. As in all Human endeavors, the humanity of Man, the ideal and the practical realities – a wide gap separates the two. When a leader sufficiently abuses his leadership mandate a prophet, representative of the Sanhedrin Court, impeaches that leader and replaces him with another. The stories in the Book of Judges and Samuel and Kings, which pits, for example: Shaul against David, serve as precedent models which separate Ordered societies from chaotic societies collapsing into a state of anarchy.

        Imposition of some grand Cathedral, Soloman Temple – like institutions comparable the newest Federal Reserve building in the US, the graphic porn of pork graft in government that has no shame – within any given civilization. Institutions compare to people that bow down and worship idols. Buildings of wood and stone do not promise efficient good governance. Public expenditure of taxes to build such grand structures of Egoism, they serve witness to a stratification of aristocratic feudal Lord/peasant economic anarchy; which imposes wealth and justifies ‘might make right’ judicial injustice, oppression, theft, and even taboo incest or murder.

        Contrast the IDF with its direct linkage with power projection through Foreign Policy. Ideally Foreign Policy plays second fiddle to domestic Home Rule. But often the nature of the Humanity of Man, Foreign Policies prioritized over Domestic Policies. This Yatzir Ha’Rah, once more its power seduction dominates the dynamic “ideal vs actual”; this gap separates the vision of governance from the cruel reality – that all men sit and crap on toilets, and it stinks. The Human potential NEVER achieves the Human ideal messiah.

        NT mythology no different than Homer’s Iliad, and Odyssey. Hesiod’s Theogony and Works and Days. Aeschylus’s The Orestia. Sophocles Oedipus Rus. Euripides Medea etc etc these Greek myth stories, they compare to how Xtians worship their silly sophomoric bible translations which depict a messiah savior that rises from the judicial oppression grave and saves all Humanity — despite the Caesar Son of Gods – the personification of Hercules/JeZeus in flesh, blood & History.

        The fly in this ever so sweet ointment, myths do not actually make and determine history. As history does not shape and determine modern life today in any society in all the annuls of Humans living on this Earth. Worshipping history as God the exact same idolatry as worshipping Shlomo’s or Herod’s Temples made of wood and stone. Institutionalized buildings, no matter the cost of their construction does not and never has produced the righteous pursuit of judicial common law justice.

      255. I suppose you do know it was the British who liberated it and filmed it as evidence and a warning for future Nazi genocide? Shame that you and Netanyahu didn’t pay more attention.

      264. Have family members killed in this war. My daughters’ car mechanic lost his wife, son, his son’s wife and their only child in this war. YOU vile santimonious Nancy son of a bitch.

      265. Yes, very terrible. But I remember saying to you long ago that your attitude and treatment of Arabs (who you described as vermin) was creating an endless cycle of hate, vengeance and violence. You create war and suffer the consequences.

      266. Mr. Fuck Head holier than thou YOUR Christ killers created an endless cycle of hate, vengeance and violence. Eat your own shitty words – slug.

      270. You sorry sack of shit. Russia-gate a democrapic lie by Obozo the clown and bitch Hillery and Pelosi the inside stock traitor. All your years of bull shit. Shit begets shit stacked up with your pro-Arab propaganda lies and false morality. Go shoot yourself you worthless vile stupid son of a bitch.

      273. Just ask yourself why it is impossible to hold a coherent, intelligent discussion about the Israeli/Arab situation.

      281. That’s where everything goes wrong – fool!! Borders are described internationally and should be respected! Obvious to any imbecile!

      283. I suppose you don’t see the world of opinion raging against your genocide. The civilised world is appalled.

      285. Letters Guardian

        Many of my wife’s Jewish family and of mine were victims of the Holocaust. The world remained largely silent. We were among the few who were reluctantly given asylum in New Zealand. The Jewish cry “Never again!” is more than justified. It has not been heeded. With the western world’s complicity, the victims now are the people of Palestine, robbed of their ancestral land, massacred in the tens of thousands, tortured in Israel’s prisons, threatened with expulsion, starved by design (‘We are dying slowly, save us’: starvation takes hold in Gaza after a week of appalling milestones, 2 August), treated as less than human – all this in defiance of international law.

        The belated recognition of a Palestinian state is no more than window-dressing for as long as the Palestine that was remains under cruel military occupation. The time for measured language is well past. It is time for action. Sanctions ended apartheid South Africa. Archbishop Tutu held Israel’s crimes to be worse. Nato acted in Kosovo. Why not in Gaza?

        Is the last word to be left with the White House as children go on dying? I write as a former chair of Amnesty International UK, one of the many NGOs now naming the genocide for what it is. Peace Now is possible, with the necessary political will.

        Canon Dr Paul Oestreicher and Prof Barbara Einhorn
        Wellington, New Zealand

        I read your article with shock as well as horror (The mathematics of starvation: how Israel caused a famine in Gaza, 31 July). What a devastating exposure of the chillingly callous use of deliberately finely tuned starvation, behind which surely lies a cruelty that many will struggle to understand.

        Peter Millen
        Huddersfield, West Yorkshire

      286. Bull shit. That Britain agreed to the Balfour Declaration which resulted in the League of Nations Palestine mandate of 1922 – absolutely morally just and righteous. Vile Amalek! Your revisionist history, name a slaughter prior to 1948 of Arabs. Arabs who absolutely refused to refer to themselves as “Palestinians”! YOU vile stupid Amalek SOB you can start with the ‘1929 Hebron Massacre’. You putrid sack of loathsome shit!

        Tortured in Israel’s prison’s? YOU vile scum, again Peter Millen from West Yorkshire knows nothing but hearsay slander. YOU vile Amalek stinking sack of shit.

      295. Distinguishing between Mercy from Pity

        johncoyote·john-coyote.com

        Have mercy.
        Have mercy Pretty girl, she told me. Chameleons faces we do have. We have become strangers to our self, forgot who we were. Once we were whiskey drinking people, who ….
        ___________________________
        ___________________________

        John mercy not the same as pity. Mercy the 4th tohor middah of the Oral Torah revelation at Horev which the church categorically denies. Torah law, something which the NT writers systematically refused to define. Torah law a legal judicial common law jurisprudence and determination of government rule – known as “Legislative Review”. Wherein the Sanhedrin common law courts not only can declare a law passed by the Legislative or Executive Branches as unconstitutional. Legislative Review takes Judicial government one step further. The Great Sanhedrin court re-writes the questioned constitutionality of a law passed by Congress or the Executive and thereafter re-introduces this court re-written law. This process known as “Mishna Torah”.

        The 4th middah of the Oral Torah stands separate and distinct from pity. Torah common law stands upon precedents. Torah commandments qualify as legal precedent in this common law legal system. Three precedent by which a person can interpret the middah of Mercy: 1. The commandment to slaughter all inhabitants of Canaan Man, Woman, and child. 2. The commandment to make eternal war against Amalek. 3. The commandment to kill the stubborn and rebellious child.

        The Torah oath brit alliance – actively entails blessing and curse polarities. If actions have their consequences like the ripple effect of a stone thrown into a pond, then these 3 negative commandments listed above they prevent a Torah curse to curse the people of Israel. No pity shown not to the people of Canaan, nor to Amalek, nor to the child who qualifies as a rebellious son. Herein distinguishes the tohor middah of Mercy from the notion of taking pity upon someone or something.

      300. Yo Jack-OFF your opinion, besides being absolutely & totally useless, you speak neither classic Hebrew or Arabic. Silly dumbass.

      303. Your bull shit pretense wherein you fart in pretense of speaking for the “World Community” what a joke! Contrast it with actual examples. Silly moron!

        The recent joint statement by Prime Ministers Christopher Luxon of New Zealand and Anthony Albanese of Australia, urging Israel to “reconsider” its actions in Gaza, has sparked debate. Joint statements from foreign leaders often lack the power to effect real change. Critics may argue that such comments are more symbolic than substantive, failing to influence the actions of a nation engaged in conflict. While the intentions behind Luxon and Albanese’s comments may be rooted in a desire for peace, the execution appears to lack depth and urgency. A more nuanced approach that considers the complexities of the situation and advocates for concrete actions could better serve the interests of those affected by the conflict.

      304. Letters Guardian

        Many of my wife’s Jewish family and of mine were victims of the Holocaust. The world remained largely silent. We were among the few who were reluctantly given asylum in New Zealand. The Jewish cry “Never again!” is more than justified. It has not been heeded. With the western world’s complicity, the victims now are the people of Palestine, robbed of their ancestral land, massacred in the tens of thousands, tortured in Israel’s prisons, threatened with expulsion, starved by design (‘We are dying slowly, save us’: starvation takes hold in Gaza after a week of appalling milestones, 2 August), treated as less than human – all this in defiance of international law.

        The belated recognition of a Palestinian state is no more than window-dressing for as long as the Palestine that was remains under cruel military occupation. The time for measured language is well past. It is time for action. Sanctions ended apartheid South Africa. Archbishop Tutu held Israel’s crimes to be worse. Nato acted in Kosovo. Why not in Gaza?

        Is the last word to be left with the White House as children go on dying? I write as a former chair of Amnesty International UK, one of the many NGOs now naming the genocide for what it is. Peace Now is possible, with the necessary political will.

        Canon Dr Paul Oestreicher and Prof Barbara Einhorn
        Wellington, New Zealand

        I read your article with shock as well as horror (The mathematics of starvation: how Israel caused a famine in Gaza, 31 July). What a devastating exposure of the chillingly callous use of deliberately finely tuned starvation, behind which surely lies a cruelty that many will struggle to understand.

        Peter Millen
        Huddersfield, West Yorkshire

      305. Peter Millen has absolutely no authority to declare “history” in Israel. That you quote a person who lives thousands of miles distant from Israel as an authoratative source only proves the depths of your moral depravity.

      306. It shows the international outrage against6 g4enocide! I suppose you would suggest the same regarding the Holocaust??? If you don’t live in Germany in the 1930s/40s you should not comment!

      307. Idiot. Define ‘genocide’. YOU vile sub-human inferior ape. Moronic sub-human of the Order of Pig, comparing the Oct7th Abomination War to the Shoah which started with the Chancellorship election of Hitler in 1933, so utterly brain dead stupid – that it really does not surprise me at all that you would make this dumb ass comparison.

      308. There you go: the deliberate and systematic killing or persecution of a large number of people from a particular national or ethnic group with the aim of destroying that nation or group: Just what Israel is doing to the Palestinians!

      310. Bollocks!! Hamas, a terrorist group, started this – not civilians. It’s not a war. It should be action against the terrorists NOT GENOCIDE!!!

      312. Some did. That obviously justifies starving them, bombing them and shooting them. When you treat people appallingly they build up resentment and hate. The Israeli genocide is fuelling more terrorism for generations to come. If I was Palestinian I’d want revenge. Can’t you understand that?

      313. Silly dumb ass son of Hitler, Oct7th started the current Abomination War. Israel gave political independence to Gaza you self righteous piece of shit. You’re not a Palestinian so STFU.

      314. Firstly, I’m not related to Hitler and (unlike you) abhor his philosophy of racism, scapegoating, hate and violence (more like you and Palestinians). You two have much more in common – hate, violence and genocide!
        Yes Hamas started it and justified a suitable response. Genocide is NOT a suitable response!
        Giving independence while controlling and treating like vermin is not real independence.

      315. Idiot Not talking about DNA silly dumb ass. YOU behave just like Hitler. This makes you a “Son of Hitler”. Vile Nazi pig sub-human ape. Your uppity declarations of genocide – simply treif Nazi Propaganda. YOU know nothing YOU vile slime of scum Nazi son of Hitler.

      316. The Nazis are in your government. Explain how you feel that me opposing genocide in any way aligns me with Hitler? You are not making sense. Your rants are stupid.

      317. Idiot coward the Nazis the “by their fruits you shall know them” product of European culture. Go FUCK YOURSELF.

      318. We can see the fruits of Nazi Israeli government – hate, fear, death, revenge, racism, war crimes, genocide. An endless cycle.

      320. Jesus was sometimes right – we see the fruits of the religious right! It’s hate, tribalism, war and revenge!!

      328. How Error progresses throughout the course of Human history.

        Israel Information Center Ithaca

        internationalscholars·israelinformationcenterithaca.wordpress.com

        Once the focus is the connection between The Torah and the real necessity for the endowed title of an existing National Israeli State, Karaites are an unity opportunity .

        There is no presumptions of against the family circles of the Cohens which evolved into the various, and even those names of Levy, assuming all efforts to reestablish their…
        _______________________________________________
        _______________________________________________

        Historical Narrative: Timeline of Key Events and Figures

        Tzeddukim (Sadducees): A Jewish sect active during the Second Temple period, known for their rejection of oral law and emphasis on the written Torah.

        Karaites: Emerged in the 8th century, rejecting rabbinic authority and relying solely on the Hebrew Bible for religious practice.

        Saadia Gaon (882–942 CE): A prominent Jewish philosopher and legal scholar who integrated Jewish thought with Islamic philosophy and emphasized rationalism.

        Rambam (Maimonides, 1135–1204 CE): A key figure in Jewish law and philosophy, known for his works like the Mishneh Torah and Guide for the Perplexed.

        Shlomo (Solomon): Often refers to King Solomon, known for his wisdom and contributions to Jewish thought, particularly in the context of the Hebrew Bible.

        David: King David, a central figure in Jewish history, known for uniting the tribes of Israel and establishing Jerusalem as the capital.

        Philosophical/Jurisprudential Argument: Key Concepts

        Pardes vs Greek logic:

        Pardes: A method of interpreting Jewish texts that includes four levels: Peshat (literal), Remez (hint), Drash (interpretative), and Sod (mystical).

        Greek Logic: Refers to the rational and philosophical frameworks established by Greek philosophers, emphasizing deductive reasoning and empirical evidence. Saadia Gaon and Rambam, though themselves deeply engaged with rediscovered Greek thought, fiercely opposed the Karaites and placed them under excommunication, just as the ancient P’rushim did to the Tzeddukim.

        Common Law vs. Statute Law:

        Common Law: A legal system based on judicial decisions and precedents rather than written statutes, allowing for flexibility and adaptation.

        Statute Law: A legal system based on written laws enacted by a legislative body, providing clear and codified rules. Both Tzeddukim and Karaites denied the Sanhedrin’s legislative review authority.

        Both prioritized “belief systems” over the Torah’s demand for judicial justice—restoring damages, making peace between Jews.

        The Karaim, while not as radical as Samaritans, still rejected the prophetic mussar of NaCH as binding precedent.

        Theological Critique: Key Issues

        Assimilation: The process by which Jewish communities adopt elements of surrounding cultures, potentially leading to a dilution of Jewish identity and practice. Karaites, like the ancient Tzeddukim, reject the revelation of the Oral Torah at Horev. This rejection undermines the core of Jewish law as a judicial common law system. Both movements embraced Greek deductive logic over Rabbi Akiva’s Pardes inductive method—the loom that weaves warp and weft to form Talmudic law.

        Avoda Zara (Idolatry): The worship of foreign gods or practices that contradict Jewish Oath brit alliance which continuously creates the chosen Cohen people through the dedication of tohor time-oriented Av commandments throughout the generations, often critiqued in the context of historical interactions with other cultures and religions.
        ______________________________________________
        ______________________________________________

        First let’s address the Title of this piece. Karaites like the Tzeddukim reject the revelation of the Oral Torah which the After meal blessing remembers the Tzeddukim attempt to cause Israel to forget the Oral Torah. Both the ancient Tzeddukim of the Lights of Hanukkah ignoble disgrace of that pre-New Testament Civil War; and the Karaites who relied upon Greek deductive logic to determine that a mezzuzza on the door post must include the 10 commandments – neither the ancient nor the stupidity of the Middle Ages from about 900 CE which aroused the indignation of:

        Saadia Gaon (882–942 CE) and the even more famous Maimonides (1135–1204) heretics – both men highly assimilated to the rediscovery of the recently rediscovered ancient Greek texts which had dominated the ancient Tzeddukim to originally reject the revelation of the Oral Torah at Horev; nonetheless both scholars absolutely rejected the Karaite heretical movement and placed the Karaite supporters into a charem excommunication just as did the ancient P’rushim to the Tzeddukim sons of Aaron.

        Both Saadia and the Rambam violated the Torah commandment not to duplicate how the Goyim worship their Gods. Commonly referred to today as “ASSIMILATION”. The re-discovery of the ancient Greek texts by the Muslim invasion of Spain re-opened the Tzeddukim Civil War can of worms – some thousand years after the P’rushim lit the Hanukkah lights.

        The revelation of the Oral Torah at Horev, 40 days following the Sin of the Golden Calf, on Yom Kippur: rabbi Akiva’s kabbalah known throughout the Talmudic and Gaonic Midrashim literature as “PARDES” p’shat, drosh; remiz, sod. This logic format radically differed from the ancient Greek deductive reasoning based upon the model of the 3-Part syllogism. The Talmudic codification of the kabbalah of rabbi Akiva’s 4-Part Pardes inductive logic, Ordered both the 6 Orders of the Mishna and its Gemara commentary thereon based upon the working model of a LOOM.

        A loom as warp & weft opposing threads. The codification of Oral Torah common law into the written Talmud seeks to employ Pardes inductive precedent based learning as the basis to shape and determine the Jewish, chosen Cohen people, cultural identity as a people. The Talmud prioritized judicial common law as the basis of the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. Tzeddukim and Karaism rejected the definition of faith as the righteous pursuit of judicial common law justice which dedicates, think korban, the sanctification of common law courtrooms/Sanhedrins making fair restoration of damages inflicted by Jews upon other Jews as the WAY to make shalom among the divided and conflicting Jewish people.

        Both the Tzeddukim and Karaim instead embraced the Goyim assimilation which defines faith as belief in some theologically determined God belief-systems. The Rambam would write his ‘Mishna Torah’ statute law code based upon Greek and Roman statute law which organizes law into judicial categories like farmers sell eggs by the dozen. T’NaCH & Talmudic common law bases itself upon rabbi Yechuda Sha’s common law upon the Book of D’varim having a second Name: Mishna Torah. The latter means “Common Law”. Rabbi Yechuda’s Mishna, a common law judicial system. The D’varim judicial mandate empowers the Sanhedrin Federal Court-room system to have Legislative Review (A second interpretation of Mishna Torah) over all governments, kings, or Tribal Prince lead governments.

        Both the ancient Tzeddukim and Middle Ages Karaim rejected the prioritization of common law Sanhedrin courtrooms as having the mandate power of Legislative Review. Both the Tzeddukim and Karaim rejected the common law basis of law that later court Judicial ruling stand upon prior Sanhedrin common law courts judicial rulings – like as codified in the 6 Orders of rabbi Yechuda’s Mishna.

        The later Karaim did not go as far as did the ancient Samaritans. The latter rejected the Oral Torah prophetic mussar as codified throughout the NaCH prophets and Holy Writings! None the less, the Karaim rejected the masoret of the NaCH as prophetic mussar precedents which make a Mishna Torah common law re-interpretation of Written Torah based on positive/negative commandment precedents & T’NaCH prophetic mussar. The much later Talmudic common law codification employs a 70 faces to the Torah blue-print diamond facet re-interpretation of employing halacha contained within Gemara sugyot as the precedents by which to view the language of the Mishna based upon a different Gemara halachic perspective.

        Hence the Baali Tosafot common law commentary to the Talmud likewise jumps off the dof of any given Gemara to re-interpret a given Gemara sugya views from a wholly different sugya perspective. Much like and similar to a building contractor reads a blue-print which contains a front/topside views. Ancient Greek deductive reasoning logic – basically flat or two-dimensional. Hence 19th Century Hyperbolic Geometry refuted Euclids 5th Axiom of plain geometry.

        Both the assimilated Tzeddukim, Dark Ages Karaim, and Middle Ages Rambam – they all rejected or did not grasp the Pardes Kabbalah of logic. The warp/weft loom of the Talmud’s most essential definition of Oral Torah as judicial common law Mishna Torah – Legislative Review. This conflict even dates back to kings David and Shlomo! The prophet Natan warned David not to copy the ways of the Goyim and build a massive Cathedral like church/Temple. The Jerushalmi Talmud carries this 3 opposed by 3 Tannaim dispute over the issue whether king David after conquering Damascus established that city as a City of Refuge with its own small Sanhedrin Federal Capital Crimes Courtroom.

        Just as king Shlomo’s son at Sh’Cem rejected the advise given by king Shlomo’s elder advisors, so too young king Sholomo likewise rejected the prophetic mussar of the prophet Natan; king Shlomo decided to construct a grand duplication of how Goyim civilizations worship their Gods; king Shlomo worshipped avoda zara when he ordered the construction of the First Temple and failed to judge the Capital Crimes case of the two prostitutes dead baby before a Great Sanhedrin Federal court in Jerusalem.

        The Talmud refers to this error as “Descending Generations”. This idea starkly contrasts with Calvin’s theology known as “Predestination”. The descending generations idea views down stream generations comparable to ripples consequent to a stone striking a pond. Once a powerful influential leader, such as either king Shlomo or the Rambam, made their respective decisions. Shlomo prioritized duplicating who the goyim worshipped their Gods by constructing a grand Temple; while Rambam embraced the sh’itta of the T’zeddukim and sought to convert the Talmud not into a polis city state but rather into a statute law syllogism Greek logic belief system which perverted faith away from judicial justice which makes fair restitution of damages unto a belief system theology which prioritizes the Ego ‘I believe’ avoda zarah which perverts the God of Israel unto just another treif Av Tuma monotheisist god. Monotheism, by definition profanes the 2nd Sinai commandment.

      334. Fuck “The world”, Israel won our political independence as a nation. NOT as “The World” you silly dumb ass mother fucker son of Hitler.

      338. Both Israel and America won their political national Independence from the British mutt dog. Hence these two specific examples negate your hot air empty void declaration “that no nation is Independent”. Fuck YOU and the Nazi ass of projectionism that you ride on. Faggot Bil’am son of Hitler.

      339. Without being constantly propped up Israel would disappear! It will anyway if it continues the way it is! Constant war! Constant hate and racism. Constant revenge! Religious mania!

      340. Your opinion does not amount to shit. For 10 years your coward piece of shit slandered President Trump. You have no reputation Fuck OFF.

      347. Algeria endured over a million people killed to win its National Independence from France. The loser French frogs likewise lost their domination over Vietnam in the mid 1950s. YOUR stinking revisionist prig history like yourself – FULL OF SHIT.

      348. Both true and sad. What’s that got to do with your present genocide. Are you really making a comparison? You see this as gaining independence? You stir up hate and revenge and then justify genocide with examples of independence wars in the past? Nuts.

      349. DISGRACEFUL. The story of a Jewish convert to the Catholic Church during the Xtian Shoah pogroms.
        Ehrenberg lived during a time when antisemitism was prevalent in many parts of Europe, including Germany. This period saw the rise of nationalist movements and ideologies that often scapegoated Jews for various societal issues. The rise of the Nazi Party in the 1930s brought about extreme antisemitic policies, culminating in the Shoah.

        This environment profoundly affected Jewish intellectuals and communities, including Ehrenberg. As an assimilated Jewish intellectual who converted to Catholicism, Ehrenberg likely encountered antisemitism firsthand, which directly influenced his perspectives and writings. His experiences provide an assimilationist traitors’ counter-narrative to the prevailing antisemitic attitudes of his time. Hans Ehrenberg converted to Xtianity in 1926.

        His conversion was significant in the context of the rise of Hitler to power. Especially as it reflected the complex interplay between his former Jewish heritage and his active engagement with Xtian theological dogma. Ehrenberg’s experiences and perspectives as a Jewish convert to Catholic Xtianity contributed to his philosophical and theological explorations, particularly regarding the relationship between Judaism and Xtianity.

        Ehrenberg’s views as a Xtian convert regarding the Talmud and Judaism reflect the broader tensions between Judaism and Xtianity during this time of Xtian pogroms. After converting to Xtianity in 1926, Ehrenberg felt a need to reconcile his Jewish heritage with his new faith. This often led earlier Jewish converts to adopt openly hostile & critical views of their former faith which prioritized the righteous pursuit of justice as faith and fear of Heaven. His hostility did not limit itself to only the Talmud. His coward racial hatred included the Hebrew T’NaCH as the foundation of Jewish common law legalism. The Talmud which asserted a central to Jewish law and tradition following its publication in about 450CE. Ehrenberg joined their ranks of the many other assimilated “Reform Jews” who grew to despise the Torah obligation to pursue judicial justice among the Jewish people.

        A Jewish Xtian convert caused the Church of Rome in 1242 to burn all the hand written Talmudic manuscripts in Paris. This stark precedent aroused the Nazi book burnings in the 1930s. Ehrenberg’s work often exposed his hostile relationship between Judaism and Xtianity. His reflections on the Shoah and the Church’s evil responses directly influenced his views on interfaith denunciations which sought to invalidate any need for church to acknowledgment its Av tuma past war crimes and guilt against Humanity.

        Many Jewish intellectuals and other leaders during and after the Shoah expressed their deep absolute revulsion and anger at the Catholic Church’s immoral indifference to the plight of Jews. Particularly the cowardly and utterly immoral crimes committed under Pope Pius XII, who betrayed “its” sub-human moral authority to speak out against the atrocities committed by both the Nazis and the Allies.

        Jewish intellectuals and leaders denounced Pius XII for not speaking out forcefully against the Nazi regime or the Allied White Paper and US closing its borders to Jewish refugees, and refusal to bomb the rail-lines leading to the Death Camps. This “sentiment”, widespread among Jewish communities and intellectuals during and after the war. Ehrenberg did not denounce the guilt of the Xtian church. But he did denounce the Talmud in his writings, reflecting his negative perspective on its impact upon shaping the cultures and customs observed by the chosen Cohen people.

        Ehrenberg criticized the Talmud as a source of legalism and as a barrier to understanding the essence of faith. He viewed it as contributing to a rigid interpretation of Judaism that he believed violated the Gospel Good News doctrine. In his works, he often and repeatedly articulated his negative views on the differences between Jewish and Xtian thought, often positioning the Talmud in a despicable light. His ignorance of T’NaCH and Talmud as common law which rejects Roman statute law exposes his racial bias coupled with his total ignorance of what separates and distinguishes Jewish common law ruled by lateral courtrooms from vertical State bribed and employed Judges and prosecuting attorneys whose job served to defend and maintain the statute laws imposed by the State and their bureaucrats, this total failure to discern between the Jewish concept of faith which revolves around judicial fair compensation for damages inflicted with the Xtian notion of faith which employs theology and creeds to define a Top-down dictate how the faithful sheep MUST believe in God.

      350. All religion is crap!! Yet you keep peddling this religious stuff as if it wasn’t religion at all and harking back to the past to justify present crimes.
        TWO WRONGS NEVER MAKE A RIGHT!!

      352. The Revisionist History Fraud the post WWII United Nations, which makes a public pedophile debauchery of the League of Nations Palestine Mandate based upon the 1917 Balfour Declaration.
        ____________________________________
        ____________________________________
        KaustubhaReflections

        The Trial of Aung San Suu Kyi: From Icon to Inmate
        KaustubhaReflections·kaustubhareflections.com

        “In politics, there are no permanent enemies, and no permanent friends—only permanent interests.” — Winston Churchill. Or perhaps just Bhola again, rearranging the furniture of wisdom while…
        ___________________________________
        ___________________________________
        I hate Winston Churchill. He authored the 1st While Paper in 1923 which proved that London had no intention to respect the 1917 Balfour Declaration upon which the League of Nations based its 1922 Palestine Mandate. In 1939 the Two-State Solution coward PM Chamberlain following the disgrace to surrendering the Czech Republic to Hitler in ’38, then passed the 2nd White Paper which determined an international decision starting with FDR’s US to close all international borders to Jews seeking to flee from the European Nazi sub-human barbarians. Europe has a reputation for back stabbing treachery. De Gaul betrayed its alliance with Israel just prior to the outbreak of the June 1967 war wherein President Nasser of Egypt swore that in this war the Arabs would complete the Nazi Shoah genocide of the Jews. Prior to the outbreak of that war Tel Aviv ordered the digging of mass graves!

        Neutral England and France did not long maintain their “neutrality”. The UN forced a cease fire after only 6 Days of fighting. The countries of the Middle East – all of which – only recently attained their “political independence as nation state” had not stomach for a long drawn out war. Israel, just for an example, its population – about 2.5 million people. Our economy could ill afford a million soldiers fighting at the front for more than just a few days.

        Post war just as England and France attempted and failed to seize the Suez Canal – and therein dominate the balance of power across the Middle East, so too and how much more so after Stalin and Ike told those 2nd rate European powers to peddle their papers elsewhere, (with LBJ tied down in Vietnam) Britain and France attempted a revisionist history at the UN with their UN SC Resolution 242 which sought to pretend that the Arabs did not disastrously lose the 6 Day War.

        LBJ raped the leadership of President Eisenhower ’56 agreement cut with PM David Ben Gurion wherein Israel agreed to return the captured Sinai Desert back to Egypt in return of the US reducing the Great Power status of both England (who won WWII) and arrogant France (who lost WWII). LBJ permitted both London and France to once again pretend themselves to be Great Powers who possessed the power to dominate the balance of power in the Middle East.

        The huge distinction of character between Ike an LBJ compares to the stark contrast between Obama (who passed UN SC Resolution 2334 which utterly negated the Israeli victory in the June 6th Six Day War), with that of the integrity of Donald John Trump who established the Abraham Accords which utterly negated the British and French 242 and later post ’73 UN 338 Resolutions of revisionist history.

        In 1948 Israel won its political and National Independence as a nation. Regardless, the UN continually attempt to make revisionist history and pretends, to this very day, that it has the rightful authority to determine the Capital City of Israel and its international borders! Bunk. Utter and complete horseradish. Israel, as an independent nation, the wars it fights and either wins or loses with its closest and immediate neighbor nation states – the outcome of these fought wars – they and only they determine the international borders Israel shares with Egypt, Jordan, Syria, and Lebanon.

        And here’s the rub. Second rate pretend “Great Powers” rape the UN in order to impose revisionist history upon the tiny Jewish state of Israel. In the Oct 7th Abomination War, South Africa’s revisionist history pretends that it has the moral mandate to declare Israel guilty of duplicating the Nazi Shoah genocide of Gaza Arabs. No nation ever accused post Dec7th 1941 Pearl Harbor America of committing genocide or starving the populations of the Japanese or the Nazis during WWII. Israel drops leaflet warnings to the general populations of an area within a town before actually bombing the region. The US made 1000 plane raids over Tokyo and Dresden; and dropped two atomic bombs. Yet South Africa and the ICC Rome treaty court of the Hague accuses Israel of committing genocide?!

        Second rate pretend ‘Great Powers’ rape the UN and use this forum which permits nations to conduct public diplomacy together, these charlatan frauds ‘Great Powers’, they without shame attempt to re-write history in their own bloated Ego image. The UN permits nations in the General Assembly and even sitting in the expanded Security Council to condemn Israel who do not even have diplomatic relations with the Jewish state. Bunk. That’s not public diplomacy, but rather political rhetoric propaganda on an imaginary World Government scale!

      353. The Revisionist History Fraud the post WWII United Nations, which makes a public pedophile …

        chet8757

        chetyarbrough.com

        Interesting. I agree with your view of Ike. I think his Presidency is under appreciated. I disagree with your assessment of Trump. I think his transactional view of life is too tied to his ego. How much money you have is no measure of human value. If one is poor, it is always their fault in one who measures wealth as a marker for what is good or bad in a person.Wealth is power to do good and harm. A transactional view of life is as likely to do harm as good—a great risk for a Democracy. Trump is a danger to America and Israel.
        ________________________________________________________________________
        Cannot speak of President Trumps’ domestic policies, except from an outsiders perspective. Prior to the Covid-19 plague employment for minorities blacks and mexicans in particular reached record breaking success. Its the minority populations who generally qualify as distressed populations. The proof to the pudding – in the eating; record high voting numbers of blacks and mexicans voted for Trump.

        Trumps’ Foreign policy I feel confident upon. In this article I shared with you I showed how the US European alliance had skewed and dominated US foreign policies strategies and perspectives.

        IKE having fought in WWII, hardly a supporter of Europe dominating US strategic policies. The US pulled Britain & Frances cookies out of the fire and not the reverse!

        Hence IKE used the 1956 Suez Crisis as an opportunity to smack down the top tier status of arrogant Limeys and Frogs.

        LBJ reverted back to the Truman era European approach. IKE despised Truman. Truman’s foreign policy stood on two legs. 1. The Marshal Plan 2. The Containment Policy. The former Aid in exchange of US military bases stationed in foreign countries, resulted in US military bases in over 155 countries according to Ron Paul when he chaired some US foreign policy Congressional Committee. Consequently I trust his opinion as an authoritative Primary Source. The latter leg, shaped the Two-State Solution which so utterly dominated LBJ’s foreign policy, as well as President Truman his predecessor. The two-state solution dominated the Korean and Vietnam Wars!

        This British foreign policy of imposing two states – a Xtian NT kingdom divided against itself old and utterly bankrupt corrupt idea. This foreign policy defined how the Roman ruled their empire.

        Its important not to focus upon personalities steering the boat but rather the course taking by the ship of State. Trump Derangement Syndrome seems bat shit crazy in my estimation. The Democrats have lost the helm direction of the ship of State precisely over their rabid anti-Trump insanity.

        Utterly abhor and detest Obama as President. And based upon what Tulsi Gabbard and others have revealed the corruption post ’16 elections the worst scandal in US History. And that’s saying a lot. Recall that Trump ran on the slogan of cleaning up the Washington SWAMP and the Heads of the FBI, CIA, NSA worked in conjunction with CNN NBC CBS and ABC!!! I hope that Trump breaks this Government established media monopoly on the order of Teddy ‘Big Stick’ Roosevelt.

        Trump succeeded through the Abraham Accords. This IKE like Foreign policy slapped down the EU/UN alliance. Recall Trump rebuked the EU over its contributions to the NATO alliance in his first term. This policy goes hand in glove with Washington and Jefferson absolute distrust of making strategic alliances with Europe.

        The foundation of the US decision to hitch its wagon to Western Europe began with the Wilson Government to made the Government Central Bank monopoly of private banking/Federal Reserve. He slipped this clear refutation of President Andrew Jackson’s closure of the 2nd National Bank in 1825 with only 3 people sitting in Congress prior to Xmas!!!! What a disgrace!

        The New government private banking Central Bank monopoly butt fucked the American economy. Its duplicated the European tradition of Central Governments establishing Corporate Monopolies. Recall the US revolutionaries throwing.

        The British empire sought to break the Chinese Tea monopoly, dominated by the Qing Dynasty. The British East India Company was initially interested in tea for its popularity in Britain. British officials discovered that the climate in regions like Assam and Darjeeling was suitable for tea cultivation.

        As a matter of perspective, the British likewise developed a stain of long stand cotton in Egypt in 1864. Hence England did not join the Confederacy attempt. British textile industries absolutely relied upon Southern long stand cotton prior to Egypt developing a stain of long stand cotton in 1864.

        English tea monopoly in India, such as the Assam Company (founded in 1839), were established to manage tea production and export. These companies controlled the entire supply chain, from cultivation to export, effectively creating a monopoly over Indian tea. The establishment of the English tea monopoly in India had lasting effects on the economy, society, and culture, shaping the tea industry as we know it today. This same fact equally applies to Wilson’s government established monopoly known as the Federal Reserve in 1913.

        The US joined the British and French alliance during WWI & WWII consequent to huge loans which the non elected Federal Reserve unilaterally decided to give to the governments of London and Paris!

        Post WWII Europe stood exhausted and utterly bankrupt. Hence IKE in the Suez Crisis immediately slapped the British and French down. Israel’s government of Ben Gurion agreed to return the captured Sinai with no Egyptian compensation for damages in return for IKE removing England and France as top tier ‘Great Powers’ in the Middle East.

        LBJ, tied down in Vietnam, permitted London and Paris to write UN Resolution 242. This UN Resolution serves as the foundation of all hostile UN Condemnations of Israel to this very day! Obama’s UN Resolution 2334 sucked the butt’s of England and France. What an absolute disgrace!

        President Trump’s Abraham Accords directly compares to the policies of IKE during the Suez Crisis of ’56. British and French divide and rule hostile imperialism argues that peace in the Middle East depends upon dhimmi stateless Arab refugee populations scattered across the face of the Middle East! President Trump slapped the European hogwash straight across their fat jowls! He argues that peace in the Middle East first and foremost must come from independent nation states in the Middle East making shalom with Israel. And NOT carving up Israel into two hostile states like as did the post WWII Allies did with Germany!! Trump argues its simply not the place of the “international community” rhetoric propaganda to determine NOT the Capital of Israel NOR the international borders of the Jewish state. NO the Arab states who make peace with Israel, like as did both Egypt and Jordan, these peace treaties, THEY and THEY alone determine the international borders of the Jewish state.

        As of late many countries in the “fraud” international community of nations, have taken up the kudgel to unilaterally recognize an independent Gaza following the Oct 7th abomination. President Trump rejects this arrogance with complete utter revulsion. Reward Arab terrorists for the Oct7th surprise attack upon Israel? You fool foreign countries have utterly lost your rational minds!

        Therefore, based upon this general comparison of US foreign policy based upon the roots of the US as an independent nation, I support and approve of President Trumps leadership.

        Domestically the 37 Trillion dollar debt takes America straight back to the 1860-65 Civil War. Doge closure of fat corrupt Federal “carpet bagger” bureaucracies – which in ’16 Trump referred to as “The Swamp”, this policy argues that the States of the Union have the Rights (based upon the Commerce Clause of the US Constitution) to bureaucratically regulate all intra-State trade and commerce independent from Big Brother carpet bagger Federal bureaucraps.

      354. Trump’s a lying friend and accomplice of Epstein who is an inept businessman lining his own pockets from gullible fools.

      358. No. They have their own views. I speak for me! I call out fascism, war crimes and genocide! Moron I am not.

      363. Ha Ha – you really believe all that Epstein distraction from Bullshit Barbie the sycophantic mouthpiece of the Orange liar?? You must be kidding! Look at the evidence not the propaganda!

      373. Its important for non T’NaCH “readers” of sophomoric translations of the bible to understand that the T’NaCH commands prophetic mussar – applicable to all generations of Israel. Therefore the T’NaCH does NOT teach history. A huge but subtle distinction, and expression of ancient scholarship skills.

        Kingdom of Edom

        Michael Ruark

        Edom (“red”) was an ancient kingdom that stretched across areas in the south of present-day Jordan and Israel. Edom and the Edomites appear in several written sources relating to the late Bronze Age and to the Iron Age in the Levant, including the list of the Egyptian pharaoh Seti I from c. 1215 BC as well as in the chronicle of a campaign by Ramesses III (r. 1186–1155 BC), and the Hebrew Bible….
        __________________________________________
        __________________________________________

        Qos — a significant deity in the pantheon of the Edomites, representing a key aspect of their polytheistic beliefs. As a god associated with various elements of life, Qos played a vital role in the spiritual and cultural practices of the Edomite people. Qos is often associated with war and protection, serving as a guardian deity for the Edomites. His role as a warrior god reflects the martial culture of the Edomites, who frequently faced conflicts with neighboring tribes and kingdoms.

        Qos was also considered a mountain god, which is significant given the geographical landscape of Edom. The Edomites inhabited rugged terrains, and mountains were often seen as sacred spaces where deities resided. This connection to the mountains symbolized strength and stability. Worship of Qos likely involved various rituals, including sacrifices and offerings. These acts were intended to appease the deity and seek his favor in matters of war, agriculture, and daily life.

        Archaeological evidence suggests that the Edomites built shrines and possibly temples dedicated to Qos. These sites would have served as focal points for communal worship and religious gatherings. The worship of Qos reflects the broader context of ancient Near Eastern religions, where deities often shared attributes and functions. The Edomites, like many other cultures, adapted their religious practices based on interactions with neighboring peoples, including the Israelites and Moabites.

        The 2nd Sinai commandment the Torah revelation acknowledges that other Gods live. The theology surrounding Qos illustrates the complexity of Edomite religious beliefs and their connection to the natural world and societal needs. Understanding Qos and his significance provides insight into the cultural identity of the Edomites and their interactions with surrounding civilizations.

        Edomites and their interactions with neighboring cultures – complex and should not be oversimplified, like as Michael Ruark has perverted in his text quoted above. The Edomites according to many biblical historians – a joke because the T’NaCH does not teach history – an ancient Semitic people who inhabited the region south of the Dead Sea, primarily in southern Jordan. Their history, intertwined with that of neighboring groups, including the Israelites, Moabites, and Nabateans. The Edomites controlled key trade routes that connected the Arabian Peninsula with the Mediterranean. This strategic position allowed them to engage in commerce with various civilizations, including the Egyptians, Phoenicians, and later the Romans. The strategic importance of these trade routes bears emphasis. These critical trade routes connect Africa with Europe and Asia. Herein explains why the Romans and the British made control of these trade routes the “Crown Jewel” of their respective World Empires. The Edomites have a famous reputation, known for their rock-cut architecture, particularly in the city of Petra, which later became a major Nabatean city. This architectural style influenced subsequent cultures and remains a significant tourist attraction today.

        The Edomites practiced a polytheistic religion, worshipping deities, such as Qos, introduced above. Their religious practices and beliefs influenced neighboring cultures, contributing to the region’s spiritual landscape. The Edomites historically known for their mining activities, particularly in copper and other minerals. This resource extraction played a crucial role in their economy and provided materials for trade.

        Over time, the Edomite civilization descended unto decay chaos and anarchy. Better organized civilizations then absorbed and assimilated Edomite cultures and customs into their larger, better organized empires, such as the Nabateans and later the Romans. This integration/assimilation facilitated the continuation of their cultural and economic contributions within a broader imperial context. Their contributions to trade, architecture, and cultural exchange highlight the interconnectedness of ancient societies and the importance of understanding these relationships in the broader historical narrative.

        Determination of scholarship research vis-a-vis the authors rubbish narishkeit of Michael Ruark, simply requires a tad of research. Recommend The Oxford Handbook of the Archaeology of the Levant: c. 8000-332 BCE” edited by Margreet L. Steiner and Ann E. Killebrew. This handbook provides a broad overview of archaeological findings across the Levant, including Edom, and situates them within the larger context of ancient Near Eastern history. It includes contributions from various scholars who are experts in their respective fields, ensuring a well-rounded and scholarly approach to the subject matter. It underwent serious scholastic rigorous academic scrutiny, enhancing its good name credibility.

        This source, it seems to me, particularly valuable for understanding the Edomites within the broader archaeological and historical framework of the region. Thomas E. Levy, an archaeologist known for his work in the southern Levant, particularly in Edom. Margreet L. Steiner, mentioned above, edited the “Oxford Handbook of the Archaeology of the Levant.” His scholarship has contributed to the understanding of the cultural and historical context of Edom and its neighbors.

        This blog paper, by stark contrast, contains several claims about the Edomites that reflect a biased or oversimplified view of their history and interactions with other groups. The Edomites simply not a monolithic group; their society – diverse in terms of social structure, culture, and interactions. Archaeological evidence indicates that Edomite society included various clans and tribes, each with its own customs and practices. This diversity historically reflected in the different archaeological sites and artifacts found in Edom, which strongly supports the theory that this civilization existed as a complex society with varying degrees of interaction with neighboring cultures.

        While scholarly debate flourishes about the nature of Edomite conversion, especially among Xtians who base their “opinions” solely upon secondary or tertiary sources, essential actual scholarship recognizes, that the conversion forced conversion of Esau to Judaism, a minor non biblical reference. The Hasmonean dynasty’s forced conversion represented an exceptionally complex process influenced by various factors, including political alliances, cultural exchanges, and individual choices. Many Edomites may have embraced Judaism for personal, social, or economic reasons, reflecting the fluidity of cultural identity in the ancient world.

        Edomite history in point of fact, characterized by its resilience and adaptation. After the fall of their kingdom, Edomites migrated and integrated into surrounding societies, including Judah. The fall of the 10 Tribe kingdom of Israel to the Assyrian empire likewise witnessed mass assimilation. Their ability to adapt to changing political landscapes demonstrates the complexity of their identity and the shared histories with neighboring groups. Simply crucial to challenge stereotypes and generalizations about the Edomites and related groups. The Edomites do not compare to Moavites. The latter qualify merely as adversaries of the Israelites; the society of Edom reflects a complex society with their own traditions, beliefs, and contributions to the region’s history. Emphasizing their individuality and complexity generally helps to combat oversimplified narratives.

        Throughout history, various groups have faced displacement, conflict, and cultural change. The Jews the only civilization which experienced repeated g’lut/exile and following 2000+ years which witnessed the bankruptcy of the Xtian and Muslim civilizations, did the Jewish people raise our dead civilization from the grave and begin our National self determination to restore the Torah Constitutional Republic built around Sanhedrin lateral common law courts with the mandate to establish law through ‘Legislative Review’ of all Governmental statute laws. By acknowledging the shared human experiences of struggle, adaptation, and resilience, we can promote empathy and understanding among different cultural and ethnic groups. By recognizing the diversity within Edomite society, challenging stereotypes, and fostering discussions that highlight shared histories and commonalities, we can promote a more nuanced understanding of the Edomites and their interactions with other groups, most especially with the Jewish people. This approach encourages empathy and appreciation for the rich tapestry of human experiences that transcend cultural and historical differences.

      380. You align yourself with some extreme right-wing people and think these Nazis make sense.
        Victor Davis Hanson has been involved in several controversies:
        His article “Facing Facts about Race” published in National Review Online has been criticized for its racist undertones and personal vendettas.
        1
        He has faced backlash for his comments regarding the Capitol riot, where he made claims that were labeled as “sloppy conjectures”.
        1
        Additionally, his views on various political issues, including his criticism of the Obama administration, have sparked debate and controversy over the years.
        1

        These controversies highlight the divisive nature of his opinions and writings.

      381. Your bias and racist opinions concerning Israelis – don’t amout to shit. Hence Nancy I refer repeatedly to you as a stinking sack of particularly vile British shit. Naturally you oppose Victor Hanson. Duh. Perfume vs. stinky shit do not work together.

        The views expressed by these organizations and media outlets often reflect a commitment to human rights and social justice, leading them to critique actions and policies that they perceive as unjust or harmful to marginalized communities, including those in the context of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Their perspectives may be seen as part of a broader discourse on racial justice and equality, emphasizing the interconnectedness of struggles for rights across different contexts.

        You stupid simplicity – as easy to read as a child’s comic book. Alas for you the comic books have more depth and wisdom. NAACP: While primarily focused on civil rights for African Americans, the NAACP has historically supported human rights globally, including advocating for the rights of Palestinians in the context of broader discussions about racial justice and equality.
        ACLU: The ACLU has addressed issues related to civil liberties and human rights in the context of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, often emphasizing the importance of protecting the rights of all individuals, regardless of nationality.
        Color of Change: This organization has highlighted the intersection of racial justice and international human rights, advocating for policies that consider the rights of marginalized groups, including Palestinians.
        Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC): The SPLC focuses on monitoring hate groups and advocating for civil rights, and it has addressed issues related to anti-Semitism and anti-Arab racism, emphasizing the need for justice for all communities.
        Race Forward: This organization promotes racial justice and may address the implications of U.S. foreign policy on marginalized communities, including those affected by the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
        📰 Progressive Media Outlets
        The Nation: This magazine often publishes articles that critique U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East, including the impact of military actions on Palestinian civilians and the broader implications for human rights.
        Mother Jones: Known for investigative journalism, Mother Jones has covered the humanitarian aspects of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, focusing on the experiences of those affected by violence.
        HuffPost: The platform features a variety of opinions and articles that discuss the complexities of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, often highlighting the humanitarian crisis and advocating for peaceful resolutions.
        Democracy Now!: This independent news program frequently covers the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, providing perspectives from activists and experts who discuss the implications of the conflict on human rights.
        The Root: While primarily focused on African American culture, The Root also addresses issues of global racial justice, including the experiences of Palestinians and the impact of U.S. policies in the region. These “Woke” shit 4 brains hate Israel and Victor Hanson. Hanson has been accused of using language that implies negative stereotypes about immigrants, particularly from Latin America, suggesting that his views reflect a nativist perspective. Idiot. Hanson has his critics just as does every movie producer and play-rite. You fool that’s how the business works. Some morons accuse Shakespeare of not being the author of his works!

        His remarks regarding the Capitol riot have also drawn backlash. Many have labeled his claims as “sloppy conjectures,” suggesting that his interpretations lack rigorous evidence and fail to acknowledge the broader context of the events. This has raised concerns about the reliability of his analyses in politically charged situations. Now weigh the facts that the DemoCRAPS destroyed Jan 6 evidence after the American people voted them out of Office!!!! That both Obama and Clinton and the intelligence community of the FBI CIA and NSA must now “lawyer up”. YOU putrid sack of shit.

      382. Letters Guardian

        Many of my wife’s Jewish family and of mine were victims of the Holocaust. The world remained largely silent. We were among the few who were reluctantly given asylum in New Zealand. The Jewish cry “Never again!” is more than justified. It has not been heeded. With the western world’s complicity, the victims now are the people of Palestine, robbed of their ancestral land, massacred in the tens of thousands, tortured in Israel’s prisons, threatened with expulsion, starved by design (‘We are dying slowly, save us’: starvation takes hold in Gaza after a week of appalling milestones, 2 August), treated as less than human – all this in defiance of international law.

        The belated recognition of a Palestinian state is no more than window-dressing for as long as the Palestine that was remains under cruel military occupation. The time for measured language is well past. It is time for action. Sanctions ended apartheid South Africa. Archbishop Tutu held Israel’s crimes to be worse. Nato acted in Kosovo. Why not in Gaza?

        Is the last word to be left with the White House as children go on dying? I write as a former chair of Amnesty International UK, one of the many NGOs now naming the genocide for what it is. Peace Now is possible, with the necessary political will.

        Canon Dr Paul Oestreicher and Prof Barbara Einhorn
        Wellington, New Zealand

        I read your article with shock as well as horror (The mathematics of starvation: how Israel caused a famine in Gaza, 31 July). What a devastating exposure of the chillingly callous use of deliberately finely tuned starvation, behind which surely lies a cruelty that many will struggle to understand.

        Peter Millen
        Huddersfield, West Yorkshire

      385. YOUR one word declaration, just as brain-dead dumbass as the letter to the Bloody Rag guardian from a foreign country.

      386. The Israeli-Palestinian conflict, particularly regarding the right to self-defense and the complexities of international law. Israel, like any nation, has the right to defend itself against attacks. This principle is often cited in discussions about military actions taken in response to threats, particularly in the context of the October 7th attacks. The comparison to the U.S. response after the attacks on Pearl Harbor illustrates the belief that nations must protect their sovereignty and citizens.

        External organizations and NGOs do not have the authority to determine the legitimacy of the Jewish state. This perspective is common among those who believe that historical and cultural ties to the land should take precedence over international legal frameworks. The situation regarding humanitarian aid to Gaza is complex. While there is a call for aid to be provided to civilians, there are also significant security concerns regarding the potential misuse of aid by groups like Hamas. The argument that Israel must ensure that aid does not bolster hostile entities is a critical point in discussions about humanitarian interventions. the importance of national sovereignty, the right to self-defense, and the complexities of humanitarian aid in conflict zones. Engaging in this discourse requires a nuanced understanding of the historical context, legal frameworks, and the diverse viewpoints

        YOU ignore bull shit letter to the editor of the Guardian rag totally ignores either debate or discourse replaced by one sided propaganda. Fuck YOU.

      387. The right to defend themselves against the horrendous terrorism of Hamas – not to bomb, starve and shoot civilian Palestinians! That is vile
        genocide!

      388. Dumbass accusations only compounded by brain dead ignorance wherein you fail to bring examples of prior historical ” not to bomb, starve and shoot civilian ” OTHER cases where mass terrorism preceeded ” not to bomb, starve and shoot civilian “. YOU silly dumb ass mother fucker.

      394. What a moron. YOUR dumbass declarations do not determine reality. Israel a secular state. Zionism a secular movement. YOUR total complete and absolute ignorance of the politics of the Jewish state only matched by your equal stupidity and ignorance of Gaza and Samaria. Face it Bozo your shit 4 brains stinks.

      395. Zionism is based on absurd religion!! Not secular at all – neither is Israel – run by Nazi religious zealots!!

      396. You silly dumb ass Herzl – an atheist. Idiot moron. Nazis come from European sub-human Ape stock, just look in the mirror — and sit on a banana.

      397. Nazis are an ideology found in ALL races!! Imbecile! Your government epitomises the doctrine – racism, violence, hatred, scapegoating, authoritarian control, genocide.

      400. Only a shortage of your utter incompetence to communicate rational logically argued thoughts and bring examples which support your love of dick up your butt.

      401. That’s like saying ALL the Jews killed Christ! Utterly stupid! ALL the Germans did not support Hitler! Many died in the German resistance! Some tried to assassinate him.
        You justify GENOCIDE!!

      402. No shit for brains: A democracy occurs when the majority of the people elected their leaders into political office. In the 1933 general election a majority of Germans elected your father Adolf Hitler.

      404. Dumb Ass 33% was the largest majority of the plurality of political parties running for the German Chancellorship. YOU STUPID DUMB ASS.

      407. Exactly. They did not support Hitler. The opposition was divided. He slid in by default. He was only supported by a minority! Exactly what I said. You are sounding like an idiot.

      408. Vile stupid SOB son of Hitler, the Weimar Republic – which ruled post WWI Germany – ruled through a coalition government imposed by England and France. Coward you bitch and complain about the Parliamentary government imposed upon the German people after WWI – FUCK YOU.

      410. Same thing that the British embargo of Germany during the two world wars “got to do with London starving babies”!!

      411. Ya see ya vile piece of shit. Jews, like all people on the Planet Earth, hold diverse views and opinions. YOU spew a one sided flat view of hatred and contempt. This makes you utterly vile and not worth the time of day.

        DISGRACEFUL. The story of a Jewish convert to the Catholic Church during the Xtian Shoah pogroms.
        Ehrenberg lived during a time when antisemitism was prevalent in many parts of Europe, including Germany. This period saw the rise of nationalist movements and ideologies that often scapegoated Jews for various societal issues. The rise of the Nazi Party in the 1930s brought about extreme antisemitic policies, culminating in the Shoah.

        This environment profoundly affected Jewish intellectuals and communities, including Ehrenberg. As an assimilated Jewish intellectual who converted to Catholicism, Ehrenberg likely encountered antisemitism firsthand, which directly influenced his perspectives and writings. His experiences provide an assimilationist traitors’ counter-narrative to the prevailing antisemitic attitudes of his time. Hans Ehrenberg converted to Xtianity in 1926.

        His conversion was significant in the context of the rise of Hitler to power. Especially as it reflected the complex interplay between his former Jewish heritage and his active engagement with Xtian theological dogma. Ehrenberg’s experiences and perspectives as a Jewish convert to Catholic Xtianity contributed to his philosophical and theological explorations, particularly regarding the relationship between Judaism and Xtianity.

        Ehrenberg’s views as a Xtian convert regarding the Talmud and Judaism reflect the broader tensions between Judaism and Xtianity during this time of Xtian pogroms. After converting to Xtianity in 1926, Ehrenberg felt a need to reconcile his Jewish heritage with his new faith. This often led earlier Jewish converts to adopt openly hostile & critical views of their former faith which prioritized the righteous pursuit of justice as faith and fear of Heaven. His hostility did not limit itself to only the Talmud. His coward racial hatred included the Hebrew T’NaCH as the foundation of Jewish common law legalism. The Talmud which asserted a central to Jewish law and tradition following its publication in about 450CE. Ehrenberg joined their ranks of the many other assimilated “Reform Jews” who grew to despise the Torah obligation to pursue judicial justice among the Jewish people.

        A Jewish Xtian convert caused the Church of Rome in 1242 to burn all the hand written Talmudic manuscripts in Paris. This stark precedent aroused the Nazi book burnings in the 1930s. Ehrenberg’s work often exposed his hostile relationship between Judaism and Xtianity. His reflections on the Shoah and the Church’s evil responses directly influenced his views on interfaith denunciations which sought to invalidate any need for church to acknowledgment its Av tuma past war crimes and guilt against Humanity.

        Many Jewish intellectuals and other leaders during and after the Shoah expressed their deep absolute revulsion and anger at the Catholic Church’s immoral indifference to the plight of Jews. Particularly the cowardly and utterly immoral crimes committed under Pope Pius XII, who betrayed “its” sub-human moral authority to speak out against the atrocities committed by both the Nazis and the Allies.

        Jewish intellectuals and leaders denounced Pius XII for not speaking out forcefully against the Nazi regime or the Allied White Paper and US closing its borders to Jewish refugees, and refusal to bomb the rail-lines leading to the Death Camps. This “sentiment”, widespread among Jewish communities and intellectuals during and after the war. Ehrenberg did not denounce the guilt of the Xtian church. But he did denounce the Talmud in his writings, reflecting his negative perspective on its impact upon shaping the cultures and customs observed by the chosen Cohen people.

        Ehrenberg criticized the Talmud as a source of legalism and as a barrier to understanding the essence of faith. He viewed it as contributing to a rigid interpretation of Judaism that he believed violated the Gospel Good News doctrine. In his works, he often and repeatedly articulated his negative views on the differences between Jewish and Xtian thought, often positioning the Talmud in a despicable light. His ignorance of T’NaCH and Talmud as common law which rejects Roman statute law exposes his racial bias coupled with his total ignorance of what separates and distinguishes Jewish common law ruled by lateral courtrooms from vertical State bribed and employed Judges and prosecuting attorneys whose job served to defend and maintain the statute laws imposed by the State and their bureaucrats. This total failure to discern between the Jewish concept of faith – which revolves around judicial fair compensation for damages inflicted – with the Xtian notion of faith, which employs theology and creeds to define a Top-down dictate how the faithful sheep MUST believe in God.

      412. You are being taken to war to commit genocide by a bunch of Nazi jews. It’s time for the majority of jews to rise up and kick the religious extremists out!

      413. Fuck YOU you vile arrogant british pig. Not your place to say shit. YOU utter coward piece of shit. Arrogant Goy you do not speak for the Jewish people. Fuck OFF.

      414. First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a socialist.

        Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a trade unionist.

        Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—because I was not a Jew.

        Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.

        —Martin Niemöller
        I speak out for the Palestinians who your government is murdering!

      420. The UN a tits on a boar hog utterly useless nonsense institution. Both the League of Nations and the UN failed from day one because neither “World government” has accountability of its corrupt bureaucraps.

        In situations where there are significant conflicts of interest among stakeholders, achieving compliance with environmental agreements, such as those aimed at reducing plastic pollution, becomes exceedingly difficult. Without the ability to impose penalties or sanctions, compliance relies heavily on voluntary participation and goodwill among nations. Only have to examine UN Human Rights Commissions to see how it become a perverted joke on matters of Human Rights.

        The comparison to the UN Human Rights Commissions highlights a broader issue in international governance where enforcement mechanisms are often weak or nonexistent. Without robust enforcement mechanisms, such as penalties or sanctions, there is little incentive for countries to comply with agreements. This can lead to a lack of accountability and a perception that violations will go unpunished.

        The inability to enforce compliance can erode trust among nations, making future negotiations more challenging. If countries perceive that others are not held accountable, they may be less likely to commit to new agreements. The perception that international bodies are ineffective can lead to public disillusionment with global governance. This can diminish support for international cooperation on critical issues like climate change and plastic pollution.

        The absence of strong accountability mechanisms within organizations like the UN can lead to perceptions of ineffectiveness. When member states can act without fear of repercussions, it undermines the credibility of international agreements. Concerns about bureaucratic inefficiency and corruption can further erode trust in these institutions. When stakeholders believe that decisions are influenced by self-interest rather than collective good, it diminishes the legitimacy of the organization. Without enforceable penalties, countries may prioritize their national interests over global commitments, leading to inconsistent adherence to agreements.

        Countries, like Israel, feel that others are not held accountable for their actions, they may be less inclined to engage in future negotiations or agreements. Nation states should all together not rely upon the international market place of international diplomacy to conduct their alliance interests with other nation states. Only face to face alliances, following the model of the Rome Treaty which established the International Court of the Hague should merit nation state respect and honor.

        International diplomacy stands upon cutting alliances and shared interests between nation states. Public forums which permit nations to air their propaganda accomplishes absolutely nothing. International diplomacy compares to a Man and woman building a family together. Whereas UN propaganda forums compare to a public whore house.

        Effective international diplomacy relies on building strong, trust-based relationships between nations. Just as a successful family requires communication, understanding, and shared goals, so too does international diplomacy thrive on mutual respect and collaboration. Alliances formed on shared interests and values can lead to more effective cooperation. When nations work together towards common goals, they can address global challenges more effectively, whether in security, trade, or environmental issues.

        Public forums, such as the UN, invarably devolve into platforms of propaganda rather than constructive dialogue. This leads to a perception that these gatherings exist more about posturing than genuine problem-solving. Nation States who do not share diplomatic relations with other countries “international law” should directly bar them from using the UN as a public forum to vent their spleen of hatred toward enemy states. To reform the UN requires that only states sharing embassies and ambassadors have the right to publicly criticize other nation state governments through the medium of UN Resolutions. Diplomacy simply not a popularity contest and how much more so a beauty contest where contestants strut around in bikinis – like chickens with their heads cut off.

        The UN international whore-house promotes political venereal diseases and mental insanity – like as suffered by George III during the American Revolution. States with established embassies and ambassadors should have the right to publicly criticize other nation states. This would clearly lead to a more accountable and respectful UN environment. This approach forces nations to engage in diplomacy rather than resorting to public UN denunciations and Resolutions of condemnation. Implementing accountability measures for nations that misuse public forums for propaganda an absolute basic fundamental which the UN currently publicly prostitutes.

        Banning Chapter VI UN General Assembly or even Security Council Resolutions of Condemnation: this worthless destructive condition within the UN Charter – merits immediate erasure. The UN simply not in the business of determining the international borders of member nation states, and how much more so the Capital Cities of their country. UN member states have no authority to promote revolution or Civil War in the domestic affairs of other UN member states. The Korean War an international disgrace and disaster. The UN Charter of Chapter VII dictates and direct threats of war has no place in the UN founding Charter.

      421. Anybody with any sense can see that we have to move on from our tribal past into a more universal position. That means doing away with the primitive tribal ideas of nations and races and moving towards a more advanced global position. That is obvious!
        As for the UN – that is a brilliant idea that has a number of flaws:
        a. It has not got the funding or clout to deal with the terrible wars and conflicts that keep cropping up between nations.
        b. We still maintain national huge armies and hold on to outmoded views of sovereignty and patriotism and are reluctant to allow a global force to intervene.
        c. We haven’t solved the checks and balances required to prevent a powerful global government from becoming an unassailable dictatorship.
        It’ll happen.
        We can’t wallow in the Dark Ages forever. One day we have to become properly civilised or wipe ourselves out!

      422. Bunk. Jews experienced 2000+ years of “universal position” of Jewish refugee populations without a country of our own. This Bunk smacks of Holocaust Denial in a Nazi “pacifist” form.

        “Obvious”, so disband England, France or Germany. What’s “Obvious” you promote defeatism for the Jewish state.

        The UN lacks a foundational “Charter” to deal with “terrible wars and conflicts” — just look at the abomination and human suffering across Africa!

        B. Not interested in your do as I say but not as I do – total bull shit.

        C. Jabber pie in the sky noise. Never a single success story on this score yet you condemn Israel. Not interested in your “It’ll happen” lies.

        Your claim of “Dark Ages” totally unsupported by anyone other than your Egotistical bloated self opinion. You do not speak not for me or any other person on the face of this Earth. No organization has even appointed you to chair or lead their private movement. STFU.

      429. First and foremost Rule #1. Both the T’NaCH and Talmud teach Torah common law. Modern Hebrew employs תקדים\תקדימים  as the translation for precedent(s).  Other Hebrew that you might have heard, I tend to doubt it, in Yeshiva:   הלכה פסוקה .  The Torah specifically states the precondition for eyewitness testimony in court cases both  דני ממון ודני נפשות. 

        Another example: אין לדיין אלא מה שעיניו רואות.   Now compare eyewitness testimony to  נצב התורה על ידי ראיות.  Now turn to the Siddur and the 13 rules of Rabbi Yishmael.  These rules function as a logical corollary to Rabbi Akiva’s kabbalah of פרדס logic. It truly bothers me that your Yeshiva rabbis never refer to the revelation of the Oral Torah at Horev, 40 days after the Sin of the Golden Calf\substitution theology wherein the ערב רב שאין להם יראת שמים attempted to introduce a translation of the שם השם לשמה (((That’s how the first Sinai commandment qualifies as a Torah commandment in the first place! All other Torah commandments: Do a person of the Chosen Cohen people do mitzvot לשמה או לא לשמה? Hence the 1st Sinai commandment: the Greatest most important commandment in the whole of the Torah.)))

        Yeshiva rabbis who fail to teach T’NaCH and Talmud as common law directly compare to the ערב רב שאין להם יראת שמים. Yeshivot produce “suits”, uniforms, styles in how to wear ones’ socks! Fancy Fur Burgers they wear on their Heads. The Yiddish term קאפוטע the common garb of the ultra-orthodox in Israel.  But the Torah does not address these archaic European nonsense foreign imported cultures and customs which Orthodox Judaism has religified.   

        Your father learned and became a Torah educator.  The modern “Wilderness generation” of the 1920s & 30s, cowardly refused to make aliyah to the Palestine mandate.   Chaim Weizmann made the statement “Jews of the world – Where are you?” in 1936.  Three years later, the criminal coward in 10 Downing Street Chamberlain imposed the 2nd White Paper which barred Palestine as a refuge for Jews seeking to flee from the European barbarians.  The “precedent” of the British White Paper of 1939 directly influenced the decision made by President FDR to close all US borders to Jews attempting to flee from the Nazi Shoah!

        Chaim Weizmann’s lamentation, “Jews of the world – Where are you?” reflects his deep concern regarding the Jewish diaspora’s response to the opportunities presented by the League of Nations’ Palestine mandate. He expressed frustration over the limited Jewish immigration (aliyah) to Palestine, especially in the context of rising anti-Semitism in Europe during the 1930s.

        Hence it appears a direct connection exists between the Wilderness generation in the Torah to the Orthodox Judaism rabbis of Europe in the 1920s and 30s who forbade Jews to participate in Zionism.  Zionism defined through the 1917 Balfour Declaration as Jewish equal rights to achieve self-determination in the Middle East.  The League of Nation introduced the Palestine Mandate of 1922 based upon the Balfour Declaration.  The Balfour Declaration defines the meaning and intent of Zionism to this day.

        Jewish self-determination means for our generations living right now: Can we restore the order and organization of the 12 Tribes “Republic”?  Democracy – a word that’s all the rage and fashion today – has its origins from Athens ancient Greece!  Think about this when you light the lights of Chanukkah.  Do you do this mitzva as just a ritual practicing “suit” robot OR do you understand why Jews light the lights of Chanukkah for thousands of years!

        The Oral Torah – a logic system.  This 4 part logic system – פרדס – stands in stark contrast to Aristotle’s 3 part syllogism.  Akiva’s logic based upon inductive logical comparisons of similar cases – Jewish common law.  Aristotle’s logic based upon deductive logical reasoning based upon Order.  The siddur has the root of סדר.  Rabbi Yishmael’s 13 middot work hand-in-glove with Akiva’s kabbalah of inductive reasoning.   בנין אב מכתוב אחד  בנין אב משני כתובים.  

        It disturbs me that your instructors have betrayed their teaching obligations!  These basic terms of Common law\משנה תורה totally alien to you.  No Yeshiva educator ever differentiated between Judicial common law courtroom laws FROM statute law which Parliaments/Knesset governments imposes as law enforced by the police upon their subject people!  You suffer from being “brain-washed”.

        Propaganda is a form of communication aimed at influencing the attitudes, beliefs, or behaviors of a population. It often involves the dissemination of information, ideas, or rumors that are biased or misleading, with the intent to promote a particular political cause or point of view. Propaganda can take various forms, including media campaigns, speeches, educational materials, and public service announcements. Governments often use propaganda to foster a sense of national identity and unity among citizens. By promoting a specific narrative about the nation’s history, values, and goals, they can create a shared sense of purpose and belonging. This is particularly important in multicultural societies where diverse backgrounds may lead to differing perspectives.

        Through public education, governments can shape public opinion on key issues. By controlling the curriculum and the information presented in schools, they can emphasize certain viewpoints while downplaying or omitting others. This can lead to a population that is more aligned with government policies and ideologies.  Governments may use propaganda to justify their policies, especially during times of conflict or crisis. By framing their actions in a positive light and portraying opponents negatively, they can gain public support for decisions that might otherwise be controversial or unpopular.

        By instilling specific beliefs and values in the education system, governments can cultivate compliance and loyalty among citizens. This can be achieved through the promotion of patriotism, respect for authority, and adherence to societal norms, which can discourage dissent and encourage conformity.  Governments may seek to control the flow of information to prevent dissenting views from gaining traction. By promoting a singular narrative in educational settings, they can limit exposure to alternative perspectives, effectively “brainwashing” individuals into accepting the government’s viewpoint as the only valid one.

        The effects of propaganda in education can be long-lasting. Individuals who are educated under a specific ideological framework may carry those beliefs into adulthood, influencing future generations. This creates a cycle where propaganda becomes ingrained in the culture, making it more challenging to challenge or change. Propaganda serves as a powerful tool for governments to influence and control the beliefs and behaviors of their citizens through public education. By shaping narratives and controlling information, they can foster compliance, loyalty, and a unified national identity, often at the expense of critical thinking and diverse perspectives.

        An example of propaganda education: no rabbi in any Yeshiva you ever learned in throughout your life has differentiated the distinctions between T’NaCH-Talmudic “common law” from Greek-Roman “statute law”; specifically never has any educator in any Yeshiva in Israel denounced the halachic codifications published by Rambam, Tur, and Shulkan Aruch as assimilated Roman statute law.  No educator ever pointed out the abomination of the Tzeddukim assimilation to Greek statute law wherein they attempted to cause the Jewish people to forget the “Oral” Torah … which we light the lights of Hanukkah to specifically “remember”.

        This shabbat past we discussed the “ORDER” of all Gemara sugyot.  The methodology of learning a Gemara sugya by way of a 3 part syllogism logic.  When Rabbeinu Tam jumps off the dof of Gemara to some other Gemara sugya you must learn its גזרה שווה comparative Case/Din learning obeys the כלל-פרט logic of rabbi Yishmael. To correctly learn any Tosafot commentary which learns by common law precedents requires that you compare the פרט of the brought גזרה שווה with the כלל of the larger Gemara sugya which includes that גזרה שווה פרט. The framers of the Talmud, Rav Ashi and Rav Ravina – together with the Sovaraim 450 to 600 CE, they edited and organized each and every sugya of Gemara into a כלל\פרט logical format. 

        An utter disgrace that your Yeshiva educators totally ignore the foundation “editors” of the Shas Bavli.  How the Shas Yerushalmi serves as the foundational source of halachic precedents to “understand” (meaning to actively compare like from like to develop the skills required to discern and understand the subtle distinctions and differences.  T’rumah and chol grains acquired from the exact same fields!  Worlds separate the one from the other.  On par with kosher slaughter vs. Goyim slaughter of cattle!  Another example: Why does the Gemara of Chullen include the minority opinion of rabbi Yechuda who insists that a shochet with fear of heaven cuts the carotid arteries? 

        Worked in a slaughterhouse, and none of those kashrut rabbis could answer this fundamental basic question. Answer: A butcher of common beef does not compare to a Cohen who slaughters to gather the “living blood” dedicated on the altar for that korban. That opening Mishna of Chullen, like every other opening Mishna of every Mishna in the Sha’s of rabbi Yechuda’s Great Sanhedrin common law compilation (the Tosefta might include judicial common law rulings of Small Sanhedrin courts), this Av Mishna of Chullen prioritizes the middah of יראת שמים – which means Baal Shem Tov/Master of the Good Name “reputation”.

        Chullen rules that if an Apecorkus slaughters an animal – even correctly – its meat remains treif. The Rambam טיפש פשט argues that everything depends upon “knowledge”. Yet this explanation collapses when one addresses the Gemara ruling concerning the Apecorkus! Answer: the Apecorkus lacks ‘Fear of Heaven’, therefore his correctly slaughtered beef remains treif.

        Before closing till I hear back from you, the Gemara of קידושין absolutely requires Torah precedents. A man does not love that which he does not own. How does a man “acquire” his wife. That woman, neither a slave or a whore both of which acquired through בכסף בשטר ובביאה. The primary pre-conditions established within the language of the Av Mishna of קידושין.

        In the 5 Books of the Torah, בראשית introduces not simply the טיפש פשט of the Avot: Avraham Yitzak and Yaacov. Rather, this first Book of the Torah revelation introduces Av-mitzvot – tohor time-oriented mitzvot which have the power to בראשית the chosen Cohen people from nothing in all generations and times. Genetics and Race does not make the chosen Cohen people. Tohor time-oriented commandments Creates from nothing the chosen Cohen people! The Book of בראשית introduces Av tohor time-oriented commandments.

        According to the B’HaG these Av tohor time-oriented commandments include even Rabbinic commandments elevated to Av tohor time-oriented commandments as מצוות דאורייתא. The Rambam, his “egg-crate” organization of Torah commandments limited to commandments found within the language of the Written Torah. This man had the Chutzpah to call his Av tuma avoda zarah assimilation to Greek and Roman “statute law” halacha, by the Name of the Book of D’varim-משנה תורה.

        Orthodox Judaism propaganda fails to differentiate between the common law classic commentaries written on the Talmud by Reshonim: the B’HaG, Rif, Rosh and Baali Tosafot from the Av tuma avoda zara statute law assimilated rabbis the Rambam, the son of the Rosh, and Karo. No Yeshiva ever informed you that the rabbis of Paris placed the Rambam into נידוי in 1232. Or that 10 years later the Poop/Pope and the king of France burned all the Talmud manuscripts in Paris France and thereafter expelled all the Jews of France which permanently destroyed the Rashi/Tosafot common law school of T’NaCH and Talmudic scholarship. The failure of Orthodox Judaism in the generation prior to the Shoah which slaughtered 75% of European Jewry in less than 3 years, these rabbis have permanently destroyed their ‘Good Name’ reputations.

      433. Idiot the demonstrations concerning the power of the Courts in Israeli society going on right now in the Secular Jewish state. Idiot.

      435. So you repeatedly say, like a record with a scratch that continually repeats itself. Prove your empty declaration – this you cannot do.

      449. Exactly. Hostile opinions suck. That’s the precise point have repeated attempted to drive into your thick skull for years.

      461. Vile ignorant pig you know nothing of the criminal history of European pigs like yourself.

        Ulrich Zwingli, a leader of the Protestant Reformation in Switzerland, held war-crime views of Jews in general and Judaism in particular. He believed that the Jewish people had rejected Christ and often referred to them in derogatory terms. Cursed to wander the Earth with the mark of Cain. Zwingli’s writings included calls for war-crimes of mass expulsion of Jews from Swiss and German kingdoms. Exposing the poisoned broader trend of Church antisemitism in his time. His views influenced by the prevailing snake venom attitudes of the early church to Shoah generations. Witchcraft Xtian theology often slandered Jews as outsiders and heretics, at every available opportunity.

        Ulrich Zwingli, without any doubt one of the most inflammatory preaching Jew haters in all recorded history. He casually threw out the term “Christ-killers”, when he made hate speeches on Sundays. This label, often used to vilify Jews, like a knee reflex. So convenient to slander Jews with derogatory false blood libel slanders; suggesting that their actions and teachings absolutely responsible for the death of Jesus Christ. A deeply offensive and historically charged accusation which resulted in pogroms and forced mass population transfers. Repeated annually every Easter season. Such derogatory slander, part of the broader conflict between Catholics and Protestants during the Reformation. Both haters spew slanders at the opposing churches as if they equaled the cursed hated and abhorred Jews. They served to delegitimize Zwingli’s movement and rally support for the Catholic cause in the 30 Years War. In addition to “Christ-killers” slanders, Zwingli and his followers often labeled Jews with other derogatory terms

        These terms, part of a broader anti-Jewish Fascist-like hatred that defines the utter insanity of the people of Europe to this very day. The Reformation, hard compares to the barbarism of Christendom during 20th Century .

        Some of these inherited terms of insane hate included: “Synagogue of Satan”: This phrase was used to describe Jewish communities, condemned Jewish opposition of this false Messiah imaginary man – Harry Potter fiction. Xtains abhorred the fact that Jews reject the new testament as a fraud Roman forgery, on par with the Czar of Russia’s Protocols of the Elders of Zion.

        “Unbelievers”: This term, often spat at Jews to condemn our absolute refusal to categorize Jews accept Jesus as the Messiah; Torah common law stands upon precedents. The precedent for the mitzva of Moshiach, the anointing of the House of Aaron as Moshiach by Moshe Rabbeinu and the service of korbanot dedications which require swearing a specific and defined Torah oath. The oath of Moshiach: the oath to pursue righteous judicial justice in the oath sworn lands which HaShem swore to give to the chosen Cohen seed of Avraham, Yitzak, and Yaacov. “Infidels”: This label vomited upon Jews, suggesting that they existed as a cursed sub-human cast out Cain, an abomination of the true faith. “Heretics”: While primarily directed at those who opposed Catholic doctrine, this term equally extended to Jews whenever convenient; framing them as deviants from the accepted religious norms. Jews depicted as having the horns and tail of Satan.

        These poisonous derogatory slanders contributed to a climate of hostility and discrimination and promoted violent oppression against Jewish communities during the Reformation. They reflect the corruption inherited by both Catholic and Protestant war criminals which shaped and defined the social, and political factors of not just a generation, but all generations of European history. Zwingli’s theological positions and the broader Protestant movement often intersected with these evil Nazi-like sentiments, leading to a disgraced legacy regarding attitudes toward Jews, and the bankrupt reputation of morality of the Xtian church for all generations. Hence the T’NaCH teaches: That which is crooked can never be made straight.

        Martin Luther, his later works, such as “On the Jews and Their Lies,” he advocated for violent pogroms against Jews, including the burning of synagogues, with all the Jews of that town slaughtered and burned. Naturally the church could then confiscate all Jewish wealth and property. His rhetoric despicably & deeply antisemitic. Often cited as a precursor to later antisemitic ideologies, including those of the Nazis. Zwingli’s antisemitism, more reflective of the societal norms of his time, while Luther’s later writings had a more direct and lasting impact on antisemitic thought, influencing future generations, especially the Nazis of Hitlers’ Germany. Thus, both war-criminals directly guilty of criminal antisemitic views, Luther’s later writings, often considered far more extreme and influential in the context of modern antisemitism.

      474. Can’t you read? I’ve never denied the crimes committed by my government. The past is strewn with them. It’s you who are denying the crimes being committed by your own Nazi government.

      476. The Gaza War complexities

        The conflict in Ukraine has led to one of the largest refugee crises in Europe since World War II, with millions fleeing to neighboring countries. In contrast, while Gaza has seen significant displacement, the scale is different due Egyptian and Jordan both closing their borders to Gaza Arab refugee populations. Egypt and Jordan, which share borders with Gaza, have historically been reluctant to open their borders to large numbers of Palestinian refugees. This has resulted in significant challenges for those displaced by conflict in Gaza, as they often have limited options for safe relocation.

        In the case of Gaza, concerns about security, political stability, and the potential for increased tensions in host countries play a significant role in border policies. 1970 Black September where the king of Jordan expelled Arafat’s PLO unto Lebanon triggered the Lebanese Civil War. After Iraq invaded Kuwait, the Palestinian refugee population there side with the invading Iraqis.

        Egypt and Jordan’s reluctance to open their borders to Gazan refugees stems from concerns about security and the potential for increased tensions. The fear of destabilizing their own political situations plays a significant role in their border policies. As a result of these border policies, Gazans facing displacement due to conflict have limited options for safe relocation. This exacerbates the humanitarian crisis, as many are trapped in a conflict zone with restricted access to essential services and aid.

      477. Yes I agree with all that. The Palestinians are a destabilising force. They’ve been radicalised by events.

      484. Lair England guilty of many war crimes. The concentration camps established during the Boer War just for example. Fuck YOU.

      485. Yes. I never condone those war crimes. We have many war crimes in our past. People should have been held to account. It’s terrible.

      490. Ulrich Zwingli, a leader of the Protestant Reformation in Switzerland, held war-crime views of Jews in general and Judaism in particular. He believed that the Jewish people had rejected Christ and often referred to them in derogatory terms. Cursed to wander the Earth with the mark of Cain. Zwingli’s writings included calls for war-crimes of mass expulsion of Jews from Swiss and German kingdoms. Exposing the poisoned broader trend of Church antisemitism in his time. His views influenced by the prevailing snake venom attitudes of the early church to Shoah generations. Witchcraft Xtian theology often slandered Jews as outsiders and heretics, at every available opportunity.

        Ulrich Zwingli, without any doubt one of the most inflammatory preaching Jew haters in all recorded history. He casually threw out the term “Christ-killers”, when he made hate speeches on Sundays. This label, often used to vilify Jews, like a knee reflex. So convenient to slander Jews with derogatory false blood libel slanders; suggesting that their actions and teachings absolutely responsible for the death of Jesus Christ. A deeply offensive and historically charged accusation which resulted in pogroms and forced mass population transfers. Repeated annually every Easter season. Such derogatory slander, part of the broader conflict between Catholics and Protestants during the Reformation. Both haters spew slanders at the opposing churches as if they equaled the cursed hated and abhorred Jews. They served to delegitimize Zwingli’s movement and rally support for the Catholic cause in the 30 Years War. In addition to “Christ-killers” slanders, Zwingli and his followers often labeled Jews with other derogatory terms

        These terms, part of a broader anti-Jewish Fascist-like hatred that defines the utter insanity of the people of Europe to this very day. The Reformation, hard compares to the barbarism of Christendom during 20th Century .

        Some of these inherited terms of insane hate included: “Synagogue of Satan”: This phrase was used to describe Jewish communities, condemned Jewish opposition of this false Messiah imaginary man – Harry Potter fiction. Xtains abhorred the fact that Jews reject the new testament as a fraud Roman forgery, on par with the Czar of Russia’s Protocols of the Elders of Zion.

        “Unbelievers”: This term, often spat at Jews to condemn our absolute refusal to categorize Jews accept Jesus as the Messiah; Torah common law stands upon precedents. The precedent for the mitzva of Moshiach, the anointing of the House of Aaron as Moshiach by Moshe Rabbeinu and the service of korbanot dedications which require swearing a specific and defined Torah oath. The oath of Moshiach: the oath to pursue righteous judicial justice in the oath sworn lands which HaShem swore to give to the chosen Cohen seed of Avraham, Yitzak, and Yaacov. “Infidels”: This label vomited upon Jews, suggesting that they existed as a cursed sub-human cast out Cain, an abomination of the true faith. “Heretics”: While primarily directed at those who opposed Catholic doctrine, this term equally extended to Jews whenever convenient; framing them as deviants from the accepted religious norms. Jews depicted as having the horns and tail of Satan.

        These poisonous derogatory slanders contributed to a climate of hostility and discrimination and promoted violent oppression against Jewish communities during the Reformation. They reflect the corruption inherited by both Catholic and Protestant war criminals which shaped and defined the social, and political factors of not just a generation, but all generations of European history. Zwingli’s theological positions and the broader Protestant movement often intersected with these evil Nazi-like sentiments, leading to a disgraced legacy regarding attitudes toward Jews, and the bankrupt reputation of morality of the Xtian church for all generations. Hence the T’NaCH teaches: That which is crooked can never be made straight.

        Martin Luther, his later works, such as “On the Jews and Their Lies,” he advocated for violent pogroms against Jews, including the burning of synagogues, with all the Jews of that town slaughtered and burned. Naturally the church could then confiscate all Jewish wealth and property. His rhetoric despicably & deeply antisemitic. Often cited as a precursor to later antisemitic ideologies, including those of the Nazis. Zwingli’s antisemitism, more reflective of the societal norms of his time, while Luther’s later writings had a more direct and lasting impact on antisemitic thought, influencing future generations, especially the Nazis of Hitlers’ Germany. Thus, both war-criminals directly guilty of criminal antisemitic views, Luther’s later writings, often considered far more extreme and influential in the context of modern antisemitism.

      498. General Dwight D. Eisenhower, often referred to as General Ike, was instrumental in documenting the atrocities of the Nazi death camps during World War II. He ordered the taking of photographic evidence and the collection of testimonies from survivors and witnesses after the liberation of the camps in 1945.

        Eisenhower understood the importance of this documentation for historical record and to ensure that the horrors of the Holocaust would not be forgotten or denied. He famously stated, “We are going to tell the world what happened here,” emphasizing the need for evidence to confront any future denial of the events that took place. This initiative played a crucial role in preserving the memory of the Holocaust and educating future generations about its impact.

      499. Idiot. It was the British who documented the Nazi atrocities not Ike and the Americans. They made a documentary so nobody could cover up and deny what had happened – to deNazify Germany and prevent it happening again. Little did they anticipate that Israel would be committing the next genocide!
        The British documentary German Concentration Camps Factual Survey—one of the most haunting visual records of Nazi atrocities—was spearheaded by Sidney Bernstein, a producer working for the British Ministry of Information in 1945. He assembled a remarkable team that included:

        🎥 Key Figures Behind the Film
        Sidney Bernstein – Producer and driving force behind the project.

        Alfred Hitchcock – Served as treatment adviser, helping shape the emotional and narrative impact of the footage.

        Richard Crossman & Colin Wills – Writers of the script.

        Stewart McAllister & Peter Tanner – Editors who crafted the final reels.

        Sergei Nolbandov – Soviet filmmaker and production supervisor.

        📸 On-the-Ground Cameramen
        Sergeant Mike Lewis and Sergeant Bill Lawrie – British Army cameramen from the Army Film and Photographic Unit (AFPU), who filmed the liberation of Bergen-Belsen and other camps. Their footage captured the unimaginable horrors: tens of thousands of emaciated prisoners and unburied corpses.

        The film was originally intended to be shown to German audiences as part of the de-Nazification effort. However, it was shelved in 1945 due to shifting political priorities and wasn’t completed until decades later. It was finally restored and released by the Imperial War Museum in 2014.

      502. Accusation of genocide against Israel: This is a rhetorical weapon, not a serious legal or historical argument. The UN Genocide Convention defines genocide narrowly (intent to destroy a group in whole or part), and nothing in Israel’s Gaza war remotely fits the Shoah’s systematic annihilation program.

        Equating Gaza with the Shoah: This creates a false equivalence. It trivializes the Holocaust by comparing it to a conventional (albeit tragic and brutal) military conflict. That’s a classic form of Holocaust distortion, which scholars recognize as a component of Holocaust denial.

        Exposing the distortion: equating Shoah ↔ Gaza is not just “bad taste” but an active rewriting of history. Naming the antisemitism: Holocaust denial is a recognized form of antisemitism (see IHRA working definition). Turning the charge: Instead of defending Israel on impossible moral terrain (as if Jews must prove innocence of genocide), have unmasked the pig’s denial of Jewish historical trauma.

        Holocaust Denier as an accusation: It’s not exactly a counter-argument about Gaza itself (so in that sense it’s not a direct rebuttal). Have exposed the vast under-belly of this Opher pig. Made a valid exposure of the rhetorical abuse—that this pig antisemite, trafficks in Holocaust denial by trivialization.

      503. Oh is that your silly justification? Let me be quite clear:
        The Israeli government is a fascist entity, driven by far-right religious fanatics, led by a war criminal, who are racist and the equivalent of Nazis.
        The huge number of war crimes against the Palestinians, including indiscriminate shooting, bombing of civilians, missile strikes on hospitals and massive destruction of civilian structures, along with starving children and depriving the population of food and water amounts to GENOCIDE!!!
        That is on a par with what the Nazis did in the holocaust!
        I am not alone in stating this and that does not make me Antisemitic. I have nothing against Jews.
        The question of whether the treatment of Palestinians constitutes genocide is a complex and ongoing debate.
        Accusations of Genocide: Various groups, including the International Association of Genocide Scholars, have declared that Israel’s actions in Gaza meet the legal definition of genocide, citing systematic attacks, dehumanization, and deliberate conditions of life that threaten the survival of the Palestinian people.
        2
        Legal Framework: The 1948 Genocide Convention defines genocide as acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group. Scholars argue that Israel’s policies and actions in Gaza align with this definition, particularly given the mass killings, dehumanization, and denial of basic necessities.
        2
        International Response: In January 2024, the International Court of Justice issued a provisional ruling that found there is a plausible right to protection from genocide in Gaza, requiring Israel to take measures to prevent such acts.
        1
        Ongoing Legal and Human Rights Analysis: The UN Special Committee has also reported that Israel’s military actions in Gaza are consistent with the characteristics of genocide, highlighting the catastrophic impact on Palestinian lives.
        1

        The situation remains fluid, with ongoing legal and human rights analyses being conducted to determine the extent of these accusations and their implications.

      505. You support genocide.
        You support genocide.
        You support genocide.
        You support genocide.
        You support genocide.
        You support genocide.
        You support genocide.
        You support genocide.
        You support genocide.
        You support genocide.
        You support genocide.
        You support genocide.
        You support genocide.
        You support genocide.
        You support genocide.
        You support genocide.
        You support genocide.
        You support genocide.
        You support genocide.
        You support genocide.

      519. Oh is that your silly justification? Let me be quite clear:
        The Israeli government is a fascist entity, driven by far-right religious fanatics, led by a war criminal, who are racist and the equivalent of Nazis.
        The huge number of war crimes against the Palestinians, including indiscriminate shooting, bombing of civilians, missile strikes on hospitals and massive destruction of civilian structures, along with starving children and depriving the population of food and water amounts to GENOCIDE!!!
        That is on a par with what the Nazis did in the holocaust!
        I am not alone in stating this and that does not make me Antisemitic. I have nothing against Jews.
        The question of whether the treatment of Palestinians constitutes genocide is a complex and ongoing debate.
        Accusations of Genocide: Various groups, including the International Association of Genocide Scholars, have declared that Israel’s actions in Gaza meet the legal definition of genocide, citing systematic attacks, dehumanization, and deliberate conditions of life that threaten the survival of the Palestinian people.
        2
        Legal Framework: The 1948 Genocide Convention defines genocide as acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group. Scholars argue that Israel’s policies and actions in Gaza align with this definition, particularly given the mass killings, dehumanization, and denial of basic necessities.
        2
        International Response: In January 2024, the International Court of Justice issued a provisional ruling that found there is a plausible right to protection from genocide in Gaza, requiring Israel to take measures to prevent such acts.
        1
        Ongoing Legal and Human Rights Analysis: The UN Special Committee has also reported that Israel’s military actions in Gaza are consistent with the characteristics of genocide, highlighting the catastrophic impact on Palestinian lives.
        1

        The situation remains fluid, with ongoing legal and human rights analyses being conducted to determine the extent of these accusations and their implications.

      520. Arabs rejected UN 181 and lost their war to throw the Jews into the Sea in 1948. Losing a war has consequences. Which you continually ignore.

      521. The consequences are that they were displaced. Now, in order to get peace, they have to be accommodated. Can’t you understand that?? Not exterminated!! That’s Genocide!

      522. They lost the war they started. They rejected the 2/3rd UN validation that Jews have equal rights to achieve self determination in the Middle East. Just as do you, most vile criminal Holocaust denier.

      537. Religious masturbation, how utterly depressing

        _____________________________________________
        Intentional Faith

        Intentional Faith·pastorhogg.net

        The Weight and Gift of the Cross
        As the day concludes, reflections on Matthew 10:38 prompt meditation on discipleship through the cross. Embracing this cross, representing surrender and sacrifice, leads to true freedom and intimacy with Christ. With prayer for strength and guidance, we are….
        _____________________________________________
        Both fail to grasp the Torah concept of Sacrifices as the medium wherein the chosen Cohen People swear a Torah oath to employ tohor middot within the Yatzir Ha’Tov within the heart. Both works of fiction and revisionist history perceive God like powers awarded and bestowed from undefined Father who bestows magical powers upon his chosen beloved. Both mythical characters of Harry Potter and JeZeus make the ultimate sacrifice and sacrifice their lives as the pathway to achieve ”salvation”. Both fictional narratives fail to define either how the Torah understands the meaning of terms like prophesy and love.

        Both narratives create fantastical worlds where mythical beings possess extraordinary powers. In Harry Potter, magic serves as a metaphor for personal growth and moral choices, while in the Gospels, miraculous events are often interpreted as divine intervention. These cultural stories of ancient Hebrews and modern British witch societies, they both reflect cultural narratives that shape our understanding of good and evil, morality, and the human experience, often using fantastical elements to convey deeper emotional belief systems.

      553. Time to place the feet of the looney Left upon the hang-man’s noose trap door.

        The normalization of violence as a political tool poses a significant threat to democratic discourse and civil society. The Never Trump loon rhetoric surrounding Kirk’s assassination may encourage further acts of violence against political opponents. When political figures\demoCRAPS use violent language or frame their opponents as existential threats, like calling Trump supporters Nazis or Fascists – this slander creates an environment where DemoCRAP loons individuals feel justified in resorting to violence, which resulted in the political assassination of Charlie Kirk.

        This not only endangers those targeted but also contributes to a culture of fear and intimidation. The increasing acceptance of aggressive rhetoric by the looney tune Liberal Left diminishes the quality of political dialogue. Instead of engaging in constructive debate, individuals resort to personal attacks or threats, like as communicated by California Loon Congress Women Waters, Pelosi, Schiff and Nadler – making it difficult to address complex issues like the Russia-Gate hoax foisted upon America by the criminals of Obama & Clinton and the corrupt FBI, CIA, and NSA bureaucrats.

        Media coverage by the Lame stream media Pravda Press significantly amplified and expressed extreme rhetoric. These tools of the Corporate/bureaucrat government behind the government foisted the election of a mentally impaired Joe Biden and contributed to the electoral fraud of the 2020 Presidential elections by concealing the Hunter Biden laptop scandal and promoting the lawfare and two assassination attempts upon the life of Trump prior to the 2024 elections. MSM media focused on sensational News presentations, rather than fostering nuanced discussions. This guilt directly contributed to a distorted perception of political realities and exacerbate divisions.

      556. Gaza genocide – Wikipedia
        It assesses allegations of violations and crimes under international law by Israel in Gaza within the framework of genocide under international law, concluding that there is sufficient evidence to believe that Israel’s conduct in Gaza following 7 October 2023 amounts to genocide.”
        Israel committing genocide in Gaza, world’s leading experts say
        The world’s leading association of genocide scholars cited several actions by Israel, including attacks on the healthcare sector and the killing of children.

        The irony of those survivors of the Holocaust now doing the same to others!!

      560. The Holocaust was abominable. So is genocide. Worse are those who support either! (Nb. this is called intelligent dialogue – unlike silly slogans!)

      562. EU News: What a complete Joke
        Moldova is a small country that gained independence from the Soviet Union in 1991. Transnistria is a breakaway region that declared independence but is not recognized by most countries, including Moldova. The region has a significant Russian military presence and has been a point of tension between Moldova and Russia.

        Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky has been vocal about the need to counter Russian influence in Eastern Europe, which may involve strategic considerations regarding Moldova and Transnistria. The claim that NATO and Ukraine might be planning provocations in Transnistria to destabilize Moldova and thwart peace efforts between Trump and Putin suggests a belief in a broader strategy to counter Russian influence. However, such claims exposed skewed one sided propaganda rhetoric that has an agenda.

        The geopolitical landscape the EU “Union” with the crisis across Germany, France, and Britain far more worthy of attention. The narrative that NATO and Ukraine are destabilizing Moldova can be seen as part of a larger discourse that seeks to frame Western actions in a negative light. The EU/British issues far overshadow the Russian/Ukraine war and how much more so piss-ant Moldova, Transnistria. Hungary threatens its own Britexit.

        The EU is grappling with significant internal challenges, including economic disparities, political fragmentation, and differing national interests. Issues such as migration, economic recovery post-COVID-19, and energy security far greater pressing concerns that in point of fact merit a focused attention from silly insignificant external threats. The notion of a “Britexit” or further distancing from the EU, particularly in light of Hungary’s threats, underscores the fragility of European unity. Hungary’s stance on various EU policies has raised questions about the cohesion of the bloc and its ability to respond collectively to external challenges.

        The French national debt compares to the debt of 1789! The rise of rightwing nationalist “country FIRST”, Trump like movements in several EU countries has led to increased political fragmentation. These movements often capitalize on economic anxieties, immigration concerns, and a desire for greater national sovereignty, leading to increased political fragmentation within the EU.

        The ongoing migration crisis stooge career politicians and Parties can no longer ignore. Illegal immigration floods swept the Biden Administration out of power. Despite Biden functioning as the Scarecrow in movie “The Wizard of Oz”. The attempt to turn to ‘Green Energy’ or Germany’s dependence upon Russian oil has exposed a disaster. The perception of ineffective governance can lead to significant electoral consequences, as seen in various elections. How would the EU “union” respond to the US pulling out of NATO? Obviously this question simply speculation. But the NATO alliance directly compares to the fragility of the EU union.

        The fall of the EU would create a securiity vacuum across Europe, comparable to post WWII Europe immediately after the conclusion of WWII. The collapse of the EU would shatter an integrated European defense policy. Europeans countries have a growing distrust of Brussels, a European Army how much more so! European “collective defense capabilities” an utter joke – comparable to Obama as a US President. The Russian-Ukraine War has definitively proven that Russia does not compare to the Stalin Russian Army which defeated the Nazis and captured Berlin.

        Many European countries exhibit growing distrust of Brussels, viewing it as a bureaucratic entity that often prioritizes its agenda over national interests. Never in all Europe’s collective history has a United States of Europe as a “Republic” ever existed.

      563. Intelligence for a change!! Where did you copy this from Moshe??
        Yes the EU is in disarray. Hungary has a far-right nincompoop as a leader. Britain has lost influence in Europe and the US. Trump is a brain-dead fascist dictator who is siding with Putin (probably due to either bribes or blackmail over sex tapes) and shitting on alliances. Immigration and Islamic fundamentalism is behind it all. Osama Bin Laden won. He turned the apple cart over. Trump is backing war criminal Netanyahu and his fascist government in their genocide because Trump sees easy black and white ‘answers’ to complex situations and always sides with fascist authoritarians. Then throw in the deranged Christian nationalists and white supremacy groups, Brexit and Musk and you have the mess that Putin and Netanyahu are exploiting.

      569. Worthless load of Holocaust Denier shit

        Obtuse British Press. Two Independent YouTube News sources

        ‘No Evidence Of This!’ | UN Inquiry Says Israel Has Carried Out Genocide
        “Hamas Must Surrender Power or War Never Ends” | Daniel Rubenstein on Al Arabiya (19 Aug 2025)
        _____________________________________________

        Notice how this “Western Military Expert” ignores how the UN gossip slander declaration of genocide in Gaza. This GA Resolution so resembles the gossip slander of UN Resolution 3379 – Zionism is Racism. UN gossip fails to address the Oct 7th Hamas attack on Israel! While quoting Hamas casualty figures, as if they represented the Gospels, the gossip UN ignores that 23,000 killed – Hamas soldiers!

        How this “military expert” unilaterally promotes a European “dictate” – Two-State Solution – when neither Israelis nor Arabs agree to this foreign preposterous idea! Arabs reject Jewish equal rights to self-determination in the region. Arafat during the Clinton Administration rejected a Palestinian state with East Jerusalem as its Capital and 98% of Samaria!

        The Balfour Declaration of 1917 and the League of Nation Palestine Mandate of 1922, together with the UN GA vote where two-thirds of all UN member States recognized the Jewish right to achieve self-determination. UN General Assembly Resolution 181 on November 29, 1947, passed with a two-thirds majority acknowledged that Jews have equal rights to achieve self-determination in the Middle East. All Arab countries unilaterally rejected UN 181. On the following day when David Ben Gurion declared Jewish National Independence on May 14, 1948, five Arab —Egypt, Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, and Iraq—Armies invaded Israel. These Arab Armies “Nakba” – they failed to complete the European Shoah of the Jews and throw them into the Sea.

        Post the Israeli victory in its ’48 Independence War, and how much more so its ’67 second Independence War victory, UN 181 which called for a two-State solution ceased to have any political relevance – other than projectionist revisionist history promoted by the imperialist European States who seek a divide and conquer imperialism.

        The Charter of the PLO, written in 1964 did not declare Jordanian Samaria/West Bank nor Egyptian Gaza as “Occupied”. That PLO Charter only called the lands of ’48 Israel as “Occupied Territories”. Therefore the gossip UN slander which continuously makes its blood libel slander and declares recaptured Samaria and Gaza as “Occupied Territory”, this UN gossip slander – no different than the Church blood libel and host desecration slanders made throughout the Middle Ages prior to the annual Easter pogroms.

        Post Shoah Europe lost its ability to impose another “Final Solution” upon the Jewish People. Never Again, effectively means that Israel rejects any European influence in determining the strategic interests of the Jewish state. The News caster quite correctly and properly spanks the bottom of this “military expert” till he bled through his nose.

      570. You are a genocide denier. As someone from a race who has suffered great prejudice and discrimination and been put through genocide yourselves with pogroms and the holocaust it’s even more despicable that you should inflict it on others. The bullied become bullies. Where’s your compassion?

      571. According to this shitty Holocaust Denier. Fuck YOU. Even by corrupt Hamas casualty figures of say 66,000 deaths more than 1/3rd of these a Hamas soldiers. You call 40,000 deaths genocide. Pol Pot the Turkish Armenian genocide, the slaughter of the Native Americans involves millions just as did the Shoah.

        YOU puke stinking pile of shit. STFU.

      572. I, like the UN and a host of other authorities, call the systematic destruction of civilian houses, the harassing of the entire population, the deliberate starving, indiscriminate bombing and shooting of civilians, bombing of schools and hospitals genocide!!
        Shame on you that you don’t.
        What Hamas did was horrendous. What you are doing as revenge is worse!!

      586. קידושין

        Vector bearing azimuths in both T’NaCH and Talmud to make inductive logic case/rule comparison between similar judicial cases.  Prophets, they serve as the shotrim of the Shoftim of the Sanhedrin Federal courtrooms.  These prophetic shotrim serve as the enforcers of Sanhedrin court judicial rulings.  Prophets do not exist separate or divorced from serving as shotrim police enforcers of Sanhedrin common law judicial rulings.  Just that simple.  No fancy dance’n.

        דתני האיש מקדש.  מה שדה מקניא בחליפין אף אשה נמי מקניא
        Legal mechanisms of acquisition (kinyan), an abstract idea rather than a physical acquisition. The act of acquisition entails the husband acquiring title to the Name of the future born children which this marital union will ideally produce. Hence the symbolic “exchange” involves not the woman herself but rather the acquisition of the unborn children born into the future or O’lam Ha’bah of this marital union.

        The depth of the legal and symbolic meanings behind kinyan-acquistitions in the context of marriage, basically a Man cannot love that which he does not own.  The basic standard Torah definition for “Love” as a secondary Torah precedent commandment.  It illustrates that marital  acquisition – rejects treating the woman as property.  But rather about establishing a framework for family, legacy, and spiritual continuity of the oath brit-chosen Cohen seed of the Avot.

        Our Gemara now makes a study of T’NaCH kabbalah prophetic mussar sources which shall in their turn require making bearing azimuth precedent comparison similar cases.  Its this wisdom of Torah scholarship which ties Talmudic common law with T’NaCH prophetic mussar common law. 

        Upon this chief cornerstone common law sh’itta of Torah scholarship all generations have “this” obligation from their fathers to learn.  A man acquires his wife in the name of producing children and educating those future born children in the faith to righteously pursue judicial justice among our Cohen people.

        The first precedent   דברים כד:א: “כי יקח איש אשה”, this פרט resides within the sugya כלל of כד:א – ד. This sugya linked to the three earlier sugyot כג:כב-כד וכג:כה. וכג:כו. The subject matter of these three small sugyot vows, respect of a neighbors property and goods as does likewise the next single p’suk sugya. Our p’suk כד:א addresses כי מצא בה ערות דבר וכתב לא ספר כריתת. The דיוק made from this pasuk, just as get defined as a mitzva from the Torah so too קידושין a mitzva from the Torah. The acquisition of קידושין once profaned through a divorce cannot thereafter be acquired again. Just as a korban, once dedicated for a Shoah offering, this korban cannot later be substituted for some other korban dedication, such as an asham dedication. Once a man acquires title to the Nefesh O’lam Ha’bah soul of his wife, even God himself cannot intervene and father a child from this woman! A distinctly unique idea which the Greek God Zeus did when he fathered Hercules from a married woman.

        In Greek & New Testament mythology, divine intervention often disrupts human relationships and moral boundaries. Jewish judicial common law emphasizes the sanctity of marriage and the importance of fidelity.  The notion that a husband acquires the soul of his wife and that this bond protected by a Torah oath alliance, reflects the seriousness with which Jewish law treats marriage. קידושין emphasizes the importance of fidelity, commitment, and the spiritual dimensions of the marital relationship visa-vis tohor time-oriented commandments which continuously create the chosen Cohen people יש מאין.

        This Torah wisdom reinforces the values of respect and responsibility within the context of family and community.  The pasuk בראשית כג:יז located within the larger sugya of בראשית כג:א-כ.  Sarah did not survive the horrors of the Akedah, where Yitzak swore an oath brit that if HaShem would save the chosen Cohen seed from shoah, that he dedicates the O’lam Ha’bah life of his future born seed to do Torah mitzvot as the defining cultural trait of the chosen Cohen seed of the Avot.

        Avraham refers to himself as a גר תושב person of status.  Interesting any גר תושב accepts, while living inside the borders of Judea, to keep the 7 mitzvot bnai noach.  Why?  Observance of commandments, specifically גרי תושב commandments as defined in Masechet Sanhedrin, referred thereafter as the 7 mitzvot bnai Noach, this temporary Torah obligation permits the גר תושב to sue an Israel for damages in a Jewish court of law.  By contrast the Nacree/Canaani, as defined in masechet Baba Kama, did not enjoy the judicial legal protections enjoyed by the ger toshav.

        Therefore our Av Mishna likewise comes to distinguish and define the rights of women in Torah common law.  A ordinary woman does not possess the legal right to acquire a Man, except and unless she qualifies as a significant status, such as being a tribal chief.  For example: the prophetess Devorah as a sho’ter The concept of judicial authority existed during the time of Deborah.  Both Moshe and Yehoshua established the 6 cities of refuge with their Small Sanhedrin courtrooms.  

        Deborah served as a judge and prophetess in Israel, leading her people during a time of oppression. The Aggadic story found in the Book of שופטים (פרק ד וה), which depicts her as a leader who inspired Barak to lead the Israelites against the Canaanite army.  Prophets forever and always serve as the shot’rim of the sanhedrin common law courtrooms.  This fundamental נפקא מינא both the fraudulent counterfeit books NT and Koran failed to discern.

        Abraham’s acquisition of the Cave wherein he buried Sarah compares to the mitzva of קידושין, ideally both sets of acquisitions shall permanently maintain this status.  The status of a married woman, higher than the status of a virgin unmarried woman.  The NT virgin Mary theology perverts this Torah priority all together into a foreign alien Av tuma avoda zarah religion.

        The pasuk ירמיה לב:כה contained inside the larger sugya כלל:  לב:טז-כה.  The comparison of Avraham as a גר תושב to the people of Canaan compares to Israel invaded by the Armies of Babylon.  Avraham demanded to pay the full price for Sarah’s burial plot due to his outright distrust of the faithfulness of the nations of Canaan.  Israel to in the days of Yirmeyahu failed to rule the oath sworn lands with righteous judicial justice.  Its judges accepted bribes and perverted law.

        T’NaCH common law requires Torah scholars to shoot a bearing azimuth and find a comparable Case/Din prophetic mussar.  This Torah wisdom in essence defines how to study T’NaCH Primary Sources through the skill of learning by means of comparing similar Case/Din rulings.  A similar mussar Case/Din ירמיה ח:יג-יז.  The דיוק learned from קידושין, divorce and the Torah curse of g’lut.  Herein this T’NaCH kabbalah frames the k’vanna of the tohor time oriented Torah commandment of קידושין.

        T’NaCH common law requires Torah scholars to shoot a bearing azimuth and find a comparable Case/Din prophetic mussar.  This Torah wisdom in essence defines how to study T’NaCH Primary Sources through the skill of learning by means of comparing similar Case/Din rulings.  A similar mussar Case/Din ירמיה ח:יג-יז.  The דיוק learned from קידושין, divorce and the Torah curse of g’lut.  Herein this T’NaCH kabbalah frames the k’vanna of the tohor time oriented Torah commandment of קידושין.

        תני האשה נקנית וניתני התם האיש קונה.  מעיקא תני לישנא דאורייתא ולבסוף תני לישנא דרבנן.  ומאי לישנא דרבנן דאמר לה אשה קנויה לעולם מהקדש וניתני הכא דאיש קינה משום דקא בעי למיתנא סיפא וקונה את אצמה

        What does the language אשה קנויה לעולם מהקדש? This refers to the oath brit sworn between the pieces wherein HaShem cut a brit with Avram that his future born Cohen seed would number the stars in the heavens for multitude. Torah common law always learns by means of prior precedent rulings. Any attempt to read the Talmud, as if it existed as a common book of pleasurable reading, like fiction – utterly false. The Talmud stands upon the mandate of the Torah as the working Constitution of the Republic. Upon this יסוד both the T’NaCH and Talmud stand. Just as the mitzva of קידושין represents a permanent status so too and how much more so the Torah as the Constitution of the Republic stands as a permanent status. The transformation of קידושין as a rabbinic commandment likewise changed the status of the Torah away from a Constitutional basic law document unto a religious law of ritual observances as codified in the Shulkan Aruch. The one bears no resemblance to the other any more than a bastard child born from adultery, resembles the profaned husband’s relationship with his wife.

      587. Coward Son of a Bitch, you cannot say shit to these basic FACTS.

        The uninhabited Negev Desert covers about 60% of Israel’s total land area, which is approximately 12,000 square kilometers (4,633 square miles). The total Area of Israel: Approximately 20,770 square kilometers (8,019 square miles). After subtracting the Negev Desert, the remaining area of Israel is roughly comparable to Lebanon, which has an area of 10,452 square kilometers (4,036 square miles).

        Never existed a State of Palestine. Yet pigs like you demand East Jerusalem and all of Samaria. Yet these terms even Arafat refused! Your Nazi propaganda canard lie which frames the Arab/Jewish dispute over land, that this land dispute defines the Palestinian war against Jews in Israel… what a load of shit. All Arab countries rejected the UN 1947 Resolution 181 which called for a 2 state solution.

        Shit 4 brains the 5 Arab countries that invaded the Jewish state on the very day that Ben Gurion declared National Independence, their Nakba – their disgrace failure to throw the Jews into the Sea! You self-centered self-righteous stupid son of a bitch Holocaust Denier.

        The 1964 PLO Charter only referred to ’48 Israel as “occupied territory” NOT Samaria/Jordan’s west bank or Gaza\Egypt ruled that land prior to the Arab Nakba in the June 1967 War.

      593. While Kirk was a stupid college dropout promoting hatred, intolerance and division, a pro-Trump fascist, misogynist neanderthal, I would never promote his nor anybody else’s assassination.

      603. A clear example how the Rambam Yad avoda zara worshipped Islam’s false notion of some Universal ONE God Monotheism nonsense.

        The 10 plagues judged the Gods of Egypt. Elijah confronted the priests who worshipped Baal! The notion that the Torah commands monotheism confuses Islam with Torah. Flat out just that simple. The Talmud states that the Goyim rejected the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. Goyim do not worship their own Gods? Of course Goyim worship their own Gods. Since Goyim do not accept the revelation of the Torah at Sinai, therefore Goyim by definition worship other Gods.

        Many societies have their own deities and religious systems, which can be seen as a form of polytheism. Hinduism clearly proves that Islamic monotheism – false. The seven mitzvot bnai Noach refers to gere toshav temporary residents living within the borders of Judea. It does not teach the absurd notion of some Universal God. Islam teaches this avoda zarah.

        For a ger toshav to violate one of the 7 mitzvot – this qualifies as a Capital Crime/death penalty offence. Only a Sanhedrin court could judicate a Capital Crime/death penalty case. The jurisdiction of all Sanhedrin courts, only within the borders of Judea. Hence the absurd notion that the 7 mitzvot Bnai Noach applies Universally to all Goyim, simply pie in the sky bat shit crazy. The Torah in the Book of D’varim defines two types of Goyim; the ger toshav in mesechta Sanhedrin and the Nacree/Canaani in Baba Kama. Concerning treif meat the Book of D’varim writes: permitted to give the treif meat to the ger toshav or sell the treif meat to the Canaani. The Talmud defines the Chumash. It does not rule independent from the Written Torah Constitutional Mandate. Mesechta Sanhedrin whose Aggada addresses the 7 mitzvot bnai noach therefore refers to the ger toshav of the Torah. Mesechta Baba Kama whose Halacha rules that an Israel exempt to pay damages to a Nacree for damages inflicted upon his goods or person – this mesechta refers to Canaani in the Book of D’varim. Therefore the idea that Ger Toshav/Bnai Noach refers to all Goyim in all lands, utterly absurd.

        Therefore its patently false for anyone, especially Goyim or even later Jews, to declare that Torah commands belief in a Universal God when the Talmud teaches that only Israel accepted the Torah at Sinai and that both Yishmael and Esau rejected the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. That Goyim living in Goyim lands – if they profane the 7 mitzvot bnai noach – that a non existent Sanhedrin can put them to death for violating these 7 mitzvot while these Goyim live under the court authority of their own nations! Therefore Torah does not command monotheism. Monotheism profanes the 2nd Sinai commandment.

      606. Someone needs to perform an exorcism upon Tucker Carlson. And perhaps burn the UN at the stake for the sin of witchcraft.

        Tuma middot spirits which infect the Yatzir Ha’raw within the heart, they compare to the tendency of a dog which returns and eats its own vomit. Once a public disgrace occurs, later generations have this exact same “spirit inclination within their hearts”, to repeat the disgrace over and over and over again and again.

        Radical ideologies can incite violence or extreme actions. The blood libels have permanently left a stain upon the reputation of the Church which the Shoah utterly confirmed. Carlson’s promotion of wild speculations which condemns Jews, without evidence, of the Charlie Kirk assassination resembles the efforts of the Czar secret police forgery: the Protocols of the Elders of Zion which aroused the Russian pogroms against the Jews of Russia.

        Carlson risks damaging his reputation engaging with or promoting antisemitic slander speculations concerning the guilt of Charlie Kirk’s assassination has cracked the threshold of credibility. He has removed himself as a credible News person. He has degraded his News status to that of Yellow Journalism. Similar to the UN unilateral GA declaration which condemns Israel of genocide in Gaza. No different than the trash slander of UN Resolution 3379: Zionism is Racism.

        By speculating about Jewish involvement in the assassination of Charlie Kirk without evidence, Carlson risks perpetuating harmful stereotypes and conspiracy theories. This can contribute to a culture of anti-Semitism, echoing historical patterns of scapegoating. Carlson has sacrificed journalistic integrity for sensationalism. Carlson’s approach prioritizes sensationalism over factual reporting. This degradation of Lame Stream Media journalism produced the 4 year Russia-Gate Hoax, and the current UN GA condemnation of Israeli genocide in Gaza.

      619. Torah understands the concept of “faith” as Jews actively who commit their lives to pursue justice – even to their own personal loss. To embracing the cultures and customs wherein the sealed primary sources – they define the fabric of Jewish society; the cultures and customs practiced by the Chosen Cohen seed of the Avot. Walking the path walk of chosen Cohen destiny, this has absolutely nothing what so ever to do with what a person personally believes concerning the nation of the Gods. Avoda zara runs down this completely different and separated faith path.

        מחילה purges the trangression offense but it still leaves a stain like as does wine spilt upon a white garment. תשובה actively requires remembering the oaths sworn by Avraham Yitzak and Yaacov wherein they cut an oath brit alliance with HaShem through tohor time-oriented Torah commandments to eternally create יש מאין the chosen Cohen people. Nazi antisemitic racists assume that the Jewish people exist as a race; that our DNA determines our Jewishness. WRONG.

        The false avoda zarah religions – both Xtianity and Islam worship foreign alien Gods… the 2nd Sinai commandment! T’shuva compares to regret and repentance … this false translation of t’shuva compares to the righteousness of a whore in church following the Saturday night cowboy cattle drive that entered into Dodge City Friday afternoon, where the boys immediately ran to the local whore-house.

        T’shuva: process that involves remembering the oaths sworn by the Avot to cut the brit which creates the chosen Cohen people in all and every generation. What specific oaths did Avraham Yitzak and Yaacov swear in order to cut an oath brit Alliance with HaShem that for all generations the chosen Cohen people would live through the holiness of doing tohor time-oriented Av Torah commandments?

        The reciprocal nature of the covenantal relationship between HaShem and Avraham. The understanding of oaths in this context is crucial for grasping the depth of the covenant established in the Torah. Avram’s oath back to HaShem understood through prophetic Mussar that He swore an oath through שם ומלכות that the Divine Shekinah spirit would live inside the Yatzir HaTov of his future born (world to come) chosen Cohen people seed.

        The phrase שם ומלכות can be interpreted as a reference to the Divine attributes of HaShem. By swearing an oath through these attributes, Avraham acknowledges the sovereignty of God and the importance of aligning his actions with divine mussar Will. The concept of the Shekinah represents the presence of God dwelling among the people. By swearing an oath, Avraham is not only affirming his commitment to God but also ensuring that the Shekinah would reside within his descendants, particularly the Cohen lineage. Consequently the sages in the Talmud instruct: Tefillah a matter of the heart. The false prophet and God JeZeus by stark contrast taught “Our Father who lives in Heaven etc.”

        The idea of Yatzir HaTov (the good inclination) suggests that Avraham’s oath involves a commitment to nurturing the spiritual tohor Oral Torah middot first revealed to Moshe at Horev. All the chosen Cohen descendants inherit this Torah education when their fathers dedicate their lives to having children and educating those children through Oral Torah common law. This aligns with the Torah faith which prioritizes the righteous pursuit of justice consequent to Jews damaging other Jews. The Cohen people are chosen to embody and promote ethical behavior or holiness as the pursuit of righteous judicial justice among and between our people.

        Prophetic mussar does not limit its instruction to a טיפש פשט – ethical teachings. Rather prophetic mussar defines the meaning and intent of the revelation of the 13 tohor middot revealed to Moshe at Horev wherein Jews dedicate their social behavior interactions “in the world to come” – meaning the future – based upon how the Talmud interprets the meaning to tohor middot revealed to Moshe at Horev.

        Just as Jews study Torah in order to learn what oaths the 3 Avot swore to cut with HaShem. We likewise study Talmud to understand the fabric warp/weft of the chosen Cohen people customs, cultures, and traditions throughout the Ages. T’NaCH and Talmud, Midrashim and Siddur – they “seal” the cultures and customs the chosen Cohen people socially behave with one another throughout our generations across the Ocean of Time. Hence “time oriented commandments” do not have anything to do with time – understood as a clock that ticks and tocks. Rather time refers to the perpetual observance of a defined culture and custom behavior of the chosen Cohen people throughout eternity. Consequently time-oriented Torah commandments – the Av Commandments of the Torah Sinai revelation.

        T’NaCH Talmud Midrash Siddur simply cannot become “Archaic” as the foolish reform rabbis declared in the 19th Century. Any given society must have its defining cultures and customs embraced by that people who make up any given society. The chosen Cohen people, we have cultural traditions which compare to a genetic inheritance while operating completely independent of the Human genetic gnome.

        Texts such as the T’NaCH, Talmud, Midrashim, and Siddur play a vital role in “sealing” the cultural practices of the Cohen people. They provide a framework for social behavior and communal identity, ensuring that the values and teachings of the Torah are transmitted across generations. Studying Jewish texts as a means of connecting with the sworn oath alliance brit legacy, first established by the Avot, actively requires – understanding the cultural and ethical fabric of the Cohen people. This Oral Torah approach highlights the dynamic nature of Jewish identity, where tradition and contemporary practice are intertwined across the “Ocean of Time.” Oral Torah shares no common ground with theological creedal belief systems which command believers how they must believe in the Gods.

      631. קידושין

        The language “גופא”, the Gemara employs to indicate that discussion returns to Primary priority topic, as opposed to a secondary point of discussion.  Our Gemara jumps directly into the פרדס\י”ג מידות Oral Torah wisdom skill of shooting a bearing azimuth, to make a reference direction, typically true north. Commonly used in navigation, surveying, and mapping to describe the orientation of a line or path. The 8th middah of the Oral Torah revelation – אמת – interpreted to mean “Path”.  Halacha, as a significant defining term expressed throughout the Talmud likewise understood to mean “Path”.

        The study of Talmudic common, prioritizes the “journey” rather than the “destination”.   By stark and absolute contrast, the statute halachic codes made famous by the Yad, Tur, and Shulkan Aruch codes prioritize the “destination” over the “journey”; halacha takes on a meaning all its own.  Whereas halacha employed within the pages of the Sha’s, so to speak, has no legs of its own to walk.  The “משל” statute law halachic codes, they compare to a fiat based economy rather than a gold or silver commodity based economy.

        This גופא, represents a subtle shift which post the Rambam Civil War rabbinic authorities utterly fail to either acknowledge or recognize.  Our Gemara:
        דף יא.  גופא.  אמר רב יהודה אמר רב אסי כל כסף האמור בתורה  צורי ושל דבריהם כסף מדינה  
        The term צורי (tzuri) in this context, denotes gold or silver.  The Mishnaic economy during this time period of Roman occupation, an agricultural commodity based currency.  Post Nixon, by contrast, the US currency became a fiat based “war time” economy. Governments commonly turn to fiat “monopoly money” currency to pay a ballooning national debt, especially during some “war time” (לאו דוקא) economic crisis.  

        Lincoln switched to the greenback to pay for the Civil War.  This critical precedent later Wilson used as a spring board to restore the 3rd National central bank “Federal Reserve”.  The latter institution inserted the US into both European Civil Wars commonly referred to as WWI & WWII.  The bureaucratic Federal Reserve has no accountability to the American People.  It compares to the US Intelligence Agencies: FBI, CIA, NSA during the first Trump Administration. 

        This 1913 newly established “National Bank”, unilaterally made huge loans to England and France to finance their war against the German “Huns”.  In 1915 the German sinking of the Lusitania aroused public indignation across America.  But Wilson primarily based his decision to join the Allied alliance based upon the exorbitant loans which the Federal Reserve unilaterally awarded to England and France.  Wilson abandoned the advice given by Washington, in his Farewell Address in 1796, not to make “entangling alliances” with Europe.

        Lusitania sinking in 1915, the consequence of unrestricted German submarine warfare, aroused the indignation of American public opinion.  But had America joined the Central Powers alliance in 1917 England and France most certainly would have invalidated their debt – Federal Reserve unilateral and not authorized by Congress – loans.

        This debt prompted England and France to impose the crushing terms which define the Versailles treaty. England and France demanded war reparations from defeated Germany.  Wilson’s National Bank thereafter issued loans to the post-war German government to pay the Allied victors imposed war reparations.  This bank duplicated the folly that post Civil War Congress initiated following the American Civil War.  Congress restricted the currency of the Greenback by one-third.  This decision restricted wealth into the “Robber Baron” monopoly class hands.  

        Post the fall of Wall Street, Wilson’s National Bank made the exact same error and severely restricted the flow of currency.  This error, the root cause of the Great Depression.  Consequent to the Great Depression, Wilson’s National Bank, refused to issue further loans to Germany.  This set off a catastrophic domino effect that witnessed the rise of Hitler’s Nazi Party which overthrew the Weimar Republic. Wilson’s National Bank made a fundamental shift in the cultures and customs practiced by the American people and Federal Governments. Like, for example, the British East India Company’s monopoly on tea, which resulted in the Boston Tea Party. 

        Once the Federal Government entered into the European fold of Central European economic “tradition” of Governments establishing Corporate monopolies, initiated likewise by the post Civil War ‘radical republicans’ in Congress, whose policies established the ‘Robber Baron’ monopoly class. This shift in “tradition” away from State intra-State trade autonomy, caused an American economic switch from Adam Smith’s lesafair economics to FDR’s John Maynard Keynes – Central Bank socialist economic central planning fiat currency. FDR made owning gold illegal.

        Have made a digression from the גופא of this common law commentary to the Talmud in an attempt to differentiate “tradition” between T’NaCH\Talmudic Court-based Judicial Common Law to “tradition” of the Yad, Tur, Shulkan Aruch statute halachic religious ritual legalism. This issue raises … who determines the culture and customs practiced by the chosen Cohen people; can our generation achieve Zionist self-determination and restore the Torah as the Written Constitution of our Republic of 12 Tribes in the Middle East; which includes the Talmud as the working model for our lateral common law Sanhedrin court Federal system; the Sanhedrin, mandated with the Constitutional power of Legislative Review over state and Federal government statute laws?

        גופא – דתני האיש מקדש משום דקא בעי למיתני כסף וכסף מנ”ל? (דברים כב) כי יקח איש אישה. וכתיב התם (בראשית כג) נתתי כסף השדה קח ממני. וקיחה איקרי קנין.

        Our Gemara now shoots an azimuth bearing. We have returned to our opening paragraph. Talmud directly weaves warp/weft threads to produce the “garments” of the Cohen priestly service within the Mishkan. This משל directly ties into the Book of שמות. What shapes and determines the Cohen “tradition” of practiced culture and custom – this the underlying study of the entire Talmud. Whereas statute law Judaism prioritizes religion, the Torah defines faith as צדק צדק תרדוף – judicial justice which strives to fairly compensate damages inflicted by Party A upon Party B.

        The building of Jewish families, the bedrock whereby the chosen Cohen people live from generation to generation. A man marries a woman with the core obligation to produce children and educate these children in the oath brit alliance cut by Avraham Yitzak and Yaacov. This tohor time-oriented Av commandment defines the essence of the Book of בראשית.

        Rabbinic Judaism changed the “tradition” of tohor time-oriented Av commandments to a subsidiary class of Torah commandments which require k’vanna. Some undefined term(s), understood as “concentration”; or for example, attention paid to the literal meaning of words printed in the Siddur. This error duplicates the avoda zara of both “daughter religions” vis-a-vis the revelation of the שם השם in the first Sinai commandment.

        Statute law directly compares to translating the Divine Spirit Name to Words. The difference between directly viewing a beautiful sun-set and a camera picture taken of that beautiful sun-set. Exceptionally difficult for words to express the subtle distinction between shades of the same colors. The obvious difference between a painted work of art vs. a print of that painted work of art.

        How much more so the Divine Spirit Name revelation at Sinai, expressed in the opening first commandment. Substituting word translations for Divine Spirits, like the 13 middot of the Horev revelation, herein defines the treif tumah Av tumah avoda zarah – the Sin of the Golden Calf – which defines the 2nd Sinai commandment, together and along with the precedent negative commandments which forbid 1. assimilation 2. intermarriage.

        Oral Torah פרדס logic employs positive and negative Torah commandments as בניני אבות-precedents to interpret the mussar k’vanna of Av tohor time-oriented primary Torah commandments, which create the עולם הבא of the chosen Cohen people יש מאין – תמיד מעשה בראשית. This latter phrase repeated twice within the opening blessing of tefillah דאורייתא ק”ש.

        Greek culture developed philosophy. Hebrew culture spins around the central axis of “Big Picture” ideas. The two cultures – day and night, oil and water — different. The ‘Golden Age’ of Spanish Jewry witnessed the Samaritan, Tzeddukim, Karaim assimilation avoda zarah of Jews wherein our rabbinic leaders functioned as the tip of the spear-head wherein they murdered the Judges of the Great Sanhedrin to worship the Golden Calf.

        Brit does not correctly translate as covenant. Brit correctly understood – as a sworn alliance. Its now Elul: the King is in the fields. T’shuva requires that Jews remember/יום הזכרון the oaths wherein the Avot did the tohor time oriented commandment which continually creates the chosen Cohen people יש מאין.

        The mitzva of קידושין serves as a בנין אב-precedent that interprets the k’vanna of the Av tohor time-oriented commandment – brit cut between the pieces. K’vanna requires prophetic mussar as its יסוד. This k’vanna separates the Priority Av tohor time-oriented commandments from the secondary positive & negative Torah & Talmudic mitzvot — which do not require k’vanna.

        Reading words from a book simply does not compare to the discipline of shooting בנין אב bearing azimuths. Consequently, translating T’NaCH or Talmud, worse than an utter waste of time. People read these “books”, but fail to study common law. Common law/Oral Torah – no book can write down or contain. Why? Because the study of common law depends upon comparing similar Case/Rule precedents. The sages “wrote” the Oral Torah into the T’NaCH and Talmud. But a scholar must make the precedent search – not the printed book. The Talmud only functions as a guide. You can lead a donkey to the trough, but you cannot make that ass drink.

        דכתיב (שם מט) השדה אשר קנה אברהם אי נמי (ירמיה לב) שדות בכסף יקנו — תני האשה נקנית.

        Our Gemara jumps through a lot of hoops of T’NaCH kabbalah. The ass reads and moves ahead to follow the Gemara train of thought. The donkey stops and weighs the prophetic mussar contained by these Aggadic sources derived from T’NaCH Primary Sources. From my experiences in Yeshiva, the vast majority of Yeshiva asses do not make a common law study of T’NaCH nor Talmud primary sources. At best, they rely upon g’lut commentaries written over a thousand years later.

        How utterly pathetic. Worse, the rabbis of these Yeshivot fail to demand that their students study common law. They too have fallen into the trap of assuming that the purpose of the Talmud – to shape and define religious halachic observance rather than training our youth to pursue righteous judicial justice within the borders of the oath-sworn brit lands of our Republic.

        The disgrace that rabbis fail to discern the Life-death/blessing-curse distinction which forever separates the Torah blessing of living as the chosen Cohen people in ארץ ישראל from the Torah curse of enduring the judicial oppression of Par’o and his court system which defines the entire history of Jewry in alien foreign lands which culminated with the Shoah. The Yeshiva rabbis compare to brown-nose boot-licker syphilitic-syphicants.

        They do not teach Yeshiva students how to study the Torah לשמה. They do not teach פרדס\י”ג מידות Oral Torah logic. They pervert the T’NaCH and Talmud into children’s bedtime stories. Their belief system of statute halachic religious law has taken Jews completely off the דרך. Hence, no different from the Wilderness generation, they refused to encourage a mass aliyah to the Palestine Mandate before the British slammed the door shut with their 2nd White Paper.

        Their moral cowardice provoked the Torah Shoah curse, just as the Wilderness Generation has no portion in the World to Come. Prophetic mussar, if easy to swallow, the generations of Israel would not have murdered the prophets. How many times did Israel seek the death of Moshe? Prophetic mussar has a bite worse than any other predator on the Planet Earth.

        To grow and mature the seeds of prophetic mussar within the Yatzir Ha’Tov within the heart defines the purpose of the revelation of the Torah, expressed through the wisdom of the NaCH, Talmud, Midrashim, and Siddur. Hence the translation of mussar as “rebuke” as brain-dead idiotic as to translate t’shuva, unilaterally determined as repentance! Treif translations suck. Just that simple. No fancy dance’n.

        Learning how to live as the time-oriented commandment created – Cohen people – requires more than simply a primary first grade education that instructs children how to read. T’NaCH & Talmud codified into books. To quote Snape of Harry Potter: “Obviously.” But the wisdom kabbalah of Oral Torah פרדס\י”ג מידות logic requires the patience and skill of making precedent bearing interpretations which translate Mishnaic living reality to Gemara contour maps, herein separates the pursuit of dynamic judicial justice from static dogma of religious halachic statute law.

        The study of Jewish common law requires independent research. Just that simple. No fancy dance’n. Worlds separate the donkey from the ass. The latter, clearly a pejorative metaphor comparable how Torah common law perceives the Xtian/Islamic counterfeit Protocols of the Elders of Zion religions – ‘by their fruits you shall know them’.  The Yad, Tur, and Aruch statute halachic codes follow the path trodden by these two gross counterfeit religions.

      633. This the month of Elul, ‘the King is in the Field’. Meaning, its a time for Jews to remember the oaths sworn by the Avot to create time-oriented Av Torah commandments which continually create the chosen Cohen people יש מאין.

        What does Midah k’neged Midah mean? The concept of “Midah k’neged Midah” (measure for measure) is a fundamental principle in Jewish thought and ethics, particularly within the context of the Torah and later interpretations in the Talmud. This principle emphasizes the idea that one’s actions have corresponding consequences, reflecting a moral order in the universe.

        This phrase, divorced from the Torah constitutional mandate which authorizes Great Sanhedrin courts to exercise Legislative Review over the governments of Tribes or even kings of Israel, suggests something akin to an assimilated idea of Karma. Which literally means “action” or “deed” in Sanskrit. It encompasses not just physical actions but also thoughts and intentions. The principle asserts that good actions lead to positive outcomes, while negative actions result in adverse consequences.

        Jews in exile often navigate between their traditional beliefs and the surrounding cultures. This can lead to varying degrees of assimilation, which may affect their understanding and practice of concepts like “Midah k’neged Midah.” Jews in exile often face the challenge of maintaining their identity while adapting to the surrounding cultures. This can lead to a reinterpretation of traditional concepts, such as “Midah k’neged Midah,” as they integrate elements from their host cultures. The assimilation of ideas can sometimes dilute the original meanings or lead to new interpretations that resonate with contemporary experiences.

        Jews living in exile often navigate the complexities of maintaining their cultural and religious identity while adapting to the surrounding societies. This can lead to a reinterpretation of traditional concepts, including Midah k’neged Midah. The integration of surrounding cultural elements can influence how Jewish communities understand and practice their beliefs. This may result in a blending of ideas, where traditional concepts are viewed through the lens of contemporary experiences and values. This dynamic Midah k’neged Midah directly refers to the conflict between the Yatzir Ha’Tov vs. the Yatzir Ha’Raw within the heart. Specifically it contrast tohor vs. tumah middot! ה’ ה’ אל רחום וחנון וכו, the revelation of the 13 Oral Torah middot at Horev on Yom Kippur serves as the יסוד meaning of Midah k’neged Midah. Yet g’lut Jews cursed by the Torah curse of not obeying the Torah לשמה, they can not discern one tohor middah from another or even tohor middot vs tumah middot in the eternal struggle of Yaacov and Esau within the womb of Rivka.

      643. Time to place the feet of the looney Left upon the hang-man’s noose trap door.

        The normalization of violence as a political tool poses a significant threat to democratic discourse and civil society. The Never Trump loon rhetoric surrounding Kirk’s assassination may encourage further acts of violence against political opponents. When political figures\demoCRAPS use violent language or frame their opponents as existential threats, like calling Trump supporters Nazis or Fascists – this slander creates an environment where DemoCRAP loons individuals feel justified in resorting to violence, which resulted in the political assassination of Charlie Kirk.

        This not only endangers those targeted but also contributes to a culture of fear and intimidation. The increasing acceptance of aggressive rhetoric by the looney tune Liberal Left diminishes the quality of political dialogue. Instead of engaging in constructive debate, individuals resort to personal attacks or threats, like as communicated by California Loon Congress Women Waters, Pelosi, Schiff and Nadler – making it difficult to address complex issues like the Russia-Gate hoax foisted upon America by the criminals of Obama & Clinton and the corrupt FBI, CIA, and NSA bureaucrats.

        Media coverage by the Lame stream media Pravda Press significantly amplified and expressed extreme rhetoric. These tools of the Corporate/bureaucrat government behind the government foisted the election of a mentally impaired Joe Biden and contributed to the electoral fraud of the 2020 Presidential elections by concealing the Hunter Biden laptop scandal and promoting the lawfare and two assassination attempts upon the life of Trump prior to the 2024 elections. MSM media focused on sensational News presentations, rather than fostering nuanced discussions. This guilt directly contributed to a distorted perception of political realities and exacerbate divisions.

      649. The opening Av Mishna of קידושין – האשה נקנית, previously shot a bearing through the fixed known points of the opening and closing of the first sugya:
        האשה נקנית מאי שנא (שהוא דומה למאי נפקא מינא? זה אחד מן הי”ג מידות תורה שבעל פה – שנקרא רב חסד.) הכא דתני האשה נקנית ומ”ש התם דתני האיש מקדש.
        And compared this fixed point upon my Gemara “Map” to a point which concludes, my error with the closing fixed point of the 2nd sugya of this “Map” Gemara:

        מיבמה שאינה יוצאה בגט יוצאה בחליצה

        However, made a mistake, the end of the first sugya of this Gemara on dof .ג wherein the Gemara brings the fixed point location “on the Map” of:

        זו אחת מן הדרכים ששוו גיטי נשים לשחרורי עבדים ניתני דברים אלא כל היכא דאיכא פלוגתא תני דרכים וכל היכא דליכא פלוגתא תני דברים. דיקא נמי דקתני סיפא ר”א אומר אתרוג שוה לאילן לכל דבר ש”מ.

        Now a virgin girl acquired through קידושין simply does not compare not to divorce nor to Yibbum – as concludes the 2nd point on the “Map” of the 2nd sugya of our Gemara. The issue in question: what exactly does the Mishna language נקנית refer to? The point of zero disputes the language of the Chumash concerning the acquisition of both slaves and Yibbum widows. The dispute, which בנין אב sh’itta precedent does the Court accept to make an inductive reasoned conclusion – “interpretation”.

        A common law court – by definition – both the defense and prosecuting attorney submit precedent briefs which support how their respective sh’itta interprets the language of the Torah. The “acquisition” through קידושין of a virgin young woman, does not compare to how slaves acquire their freedom or widows “acquired” by the brother of their deceased husband.

        So why compare the Case/Rule cases of either this or that to the our case of the acquisition of a young virgin girl? Herein defines the opening thesis statement question which our Gemara makes on this the Av Mishna of קידושין.

        The scholarship and inductive reasoning required to “shoot a bearing” in Talmudic common law, simply a completely different wisdom than that of reading a novel word for word. Herein the explanation why the translations made upon both the T’NaCH and Talmud – utterly worthless sophomoric undergraduate inferior learning.

        The opening מאי נפקא מינא to האיש מקדש likewise contrasts rather than compares. A man simply not a woman any more than a virgin “compares” to a widow or a divorcee or a slave. The study of any literature requires sharpening the skills of “comparison and contrast”. English literature 101. Our Gemara compares to a topographical military map that has elevation rings. By shooting a bearing azimuth, likened to the employ of a compass in orienteering. T’NaCH\Talmudic common law examines precedent cases to other precedent cases in order to reach a conclusive judicial ruling of the case currently heard before the Court.

        The Talmud language likewise compares to the warp/weft of a loom. Wherein the rabbis weave the fabric of culture and custom which defines the society of the chosen Cohen people. It’s this very scholarship – defining the culture and customs of the chosen Cohen people – which defines the sum total of the entire T’NaCH/Talmudic literature in one sentence.

        Contrast the 2nd Sinai commandment – avoda zara. The Koran prioritized the theological creed known as Monotheism. Whereas the Torah language of the ערב רב openingly acknowledges, especially through the Av metaphor, sin of the Golden Calf, that assimilated Jews, no different than from Goyim, both this and that worship other Gods. Intermarriage contrasts with קידושין.

        The Torah oath brit alliance has blessing vs. curse; life vs. death. Keep the terms of the sworn alliance and live as the chosen Cohen people through the Av commandments known as time-oriented mitzvot, within the borders of the nation of the Cohen people inside the Middle East. קידושין, like shabbat or Moshiach, a tohor time-oriented Torah commandments.

        The Rambam views Kiddushin as a rabbinic enactment rather than a direct commandment from the Torah. He emphasizes that while the Torah provides the framework for marriage, the specific act of Kiddushin, established through rabbinic authority. He reads the Torah exactly like Xtians “read” their sophomoric bible translations. His Yad attempts to Translate the Talmudic halachot into Hebrew! His utter and total ignorance of פרדס inductive reasoning, his avoda zara replacement theology substituted the Order which Aristotle’s deductive syllogism mandates.

        The downstream generations of rabbis failed to understand this gross error and correct it; despite the rebuke made by the Rosh common law halachic code! The mussar of the Rosh, who followed the vision of the B’HaG\Rif/Tosafot model, rabbinic orthodox Judaism totally refused to hear. Swept under the rug, the decree of נידוי – not simply limited to the court of Rabbeinu Yonah in Spain – as the post Rambam Civil War rabbis falsely teaches Yeshiva students! But far more significant, the Rashi\Baali Tosafot common law school in France. In 1232 the rabbis of Paris imposed the ban of נידוי upon the assimilated perversions written by the Rambam Karaite.

        Both this and that “literalist-טיפש פשט” heretics, both read the T’NaCH or Talmud from a strictly literalist perspective. A simple glance of his Sefer HaMitzvot, which excludes the Torah commandment of קידושין exposes the crud Av tuma avoda zarah which the Rambam perversion worships. Jews who “obey” halacha as determined by the “cross-dress” Rambam code, walk off the path of the Chosen Cohen oath brit alliance faith – to actively pursue judicial justice which dedicates to make fair compensation of damages inflicted by Party A upon Party B among our chosen Cohen People – who have the burden to rule our brit lands – unlike how Par’o, and his court which judicially oppressed g’lut Israel.

        However, the Rashi opening likewise failed to prioritize the central issue of Torah נקנית. The Baali Tosafot delves into the Torah subject of acquisitions and points out that it does not specify, “virgin”. This seems false to me. The Rivka Torah precedent, emphasized her virginity. Rivka serves as the Torah precedent-model for our Av Mishna and its Gemara here. Non the less the commentary of the Tosafot makes a similar “Map” bearing sh’itta as did my commentary. This sharply contrasts with the Rashi dictionary like definition approach to Talmudic scholarship.

        The opening Rosh fails to emphasize the contrast between a virgin girl to Avraham’s plot of burial lands. Acquisition of a virgin girl for marriage simply does not compare to the Case of Avraham burying Sarah following the horror of the Akedah. The dismal failure of rabbinic downstream commentaries to connect this Av Mishna to 1. the resurrection of the dead, connected to the death of Sarah. This story serves as a tremendous Torah event. Why?

        The mitzva from the Torah of קידושין, a man acquires the נפש עולם הבא of his wife through the future born children which he baal intends through the mitzva of קידושין. Hence this mitzva, directly linked to the brit cut between the pieces wherein childless Avram cut a brit that time-oriented Torah commandments eternally create יש מאין the Chosen Cohen seed of the Avot. This Cohen seed, not conceived through sex and sperm or genetics or race but only through Av tohor time-oriented Torah commandments.

        The Samaritans, Tzeddukim, Karaim – one and all fail to learn Torah common law. Hence they deny the mitzva of the resurrection from the dead found in the language of the Written Torah. Rambam, no different that he too excludes the Torah commandment of קידושין from the Torah! Great and mighty empires have risen and fallen, but the chosen Cohen seed of the Avot live unto all generations! How? Through tohor time-oriented Av Torah commandments which require prophetic mussar as their internal k’vanna.

        The Opening first two words of our Mishna holds a Torah commandment “BIG PICTURE” vision. Alas the famous commentators could not see the forest through the trees. It seems to me that every Av Mishna throughout Rabbi Yechuda’s common law Sha’s directly plugs into Torah commandments. ברכות opens with kr’ea shma as tefillah דאורייתא. Shabbat distinguishes between the עשר דיבורות in שמות ודברים.

        The chiddushim of the Sha’s Mishna on the Chumash requires immediate address. The contrast between the Chumash and the Talmud a day vs. night obvious distinction. Hence this begs the question, how does the one express the other? The subject of קידושין way down the list of the B’HaG mitzvot דאורייתא priorities. The comparison to Avram acquiring a burial plot with money, what connection to a rabbinic commandment? Hence קידושין like all other “rabbinic” mitzvot, when elevated to tohor time-oriented commandments – their status achieves the aliyah to ארץ ישראל-mitzvot from the Torah! Just as the resurrection from the dead, a mitzva of the Torah – as a tohor time-oriented commandment! How?

        The precedent of Avram’s stern mussar to HaShem – “I have no children to inherit my Name”. The cycle of life & death common to all man-kind. What makes the brit cut between the pieces unique? The Torah vision known as time-oriented commandments which both the NT and Koran ignore like they do the revelation of the first commandment Sinai Name – the greatest commandment in the whole of the Torah. The commandment to love God and Man merely a פרט ולא הכלל. This gross fundamental error proves the NT as a Protocols of the Elders of Zion – an utter fraud.

        The דאורייתא of the time-oriented mitzva of Moshiach dedicates the Yatzir Ha’Tov spirits of middot to pursue righteous judicial courtroom common law justices within the borders of brit ארץ ישראל. The Pauline “original sin of Adam’s fall from the Garden”, compares to how the “prophet” Natan foisted Shabbatai Tzvi (1626–1676) as a false messiah. The genesis of that avoda zara error, Jews lacked clarity that Parshat שופטים ושוטרים in the Book of דברים understands the latter as prophet “policemen” enforcers of judicial courtroom rulings. Prophets, as agents of the Sanhedrin courts empowered through Torah constitutional mandate to anoint and depose kings! No Sanhedrin court has jurisdiction in g’lut. Hence the theological narishkeit vomited by Natan – not prophetic, most definitely not mussar.

        A Torah prophet commands mussar to all generations of the chosen Cohen seed of the Avot. Chag יום הזכרון – a call through the sounding of the shofar for Jews to remember the oaths which the Avot swore a brit with HaShem to father the chosen Cohen seed for eternity. The language eternity implies the language: “resurrection from the dead” by means of a logical דיוק/inference.

      652. T’shuva NOT repentance any more that Day is Night nor Night is Day.

        T’shuva not the same as Xtian repentance. T’shuva based upon the substitution theology espoused by the ערב רב, assimilated Israel, who substituted the name אלהים for the Divine Presence Spirit which breathes within the Yatzir HaTov within the heart for the שם השם לשמה. Measure for Measure — HaShem threatened to make of the seed of Moshe Rabbeinu the chosen Cohen people. Moshe caused HaShem to do “t’shuva” and annul his false vow.

        A Torah oath exceptionally powerful even HaShem cannot break a Torah oath. This crisis event serves as the יסוד of the Yom Tov season of Rosh HaShanna and Yom Kippur. יום הזכרון – do Jews stop and “remember” the oaths sworn by the Avot to cut a Torah oath brit which תמיד מעשה בראשית Creates the chosen Cohen people יש מאין?

        The blowing of the Shofar sums up this Yom Tov – do Jews stop and “discern” the k’vanna distinction between breath brown from our lungs from the tohor middot of the Oral Torah revealed to Moshe on Yom Kippur, which our Yatzir Tov spirit both dedicates and blows from within our hearts?

        The Cohen HaGadol pronounces the שם השם לשמה by making t’shuva and the מאי נפקא מינא הבדלה רוח של רב חסד? Discernment of subtle distinctions of כוונה, herein distinguishes how tohor time oriented commandments which dedicate טהור מידות, כמו רב חסד, separates Av time-oriented commandments from secondary positive & negative commandments which do not require k’vanna. The latter תולדות מצוות do not have the holiness to create from nothing the Chosen Cohen People throughout time and history.

        ערב רב assimilated American Jewish “rabbis” know absolutely nothing about doing t’shuva. They wallow like pigs in mud adoring their assimilated Rambam רשע whose “Mishna Torah” perverted T’NaCH/Talmudic judicial common law unto cult of personality statute law, just another Golden Calf.

        Xtian substitute theology substitutes the JeZeus cult of personality as their Golden Calf. Hence their Av tumah avoda zara perverts t’shuva unto repentance. Wherein a Man expected to feel the emotions of grief. Charlie Kirk’s assassination merits grief and mourning “repentance”. Remembering the Yatzir HaRaw sin of the Golden Calf “substitution of the “WORD” אלהים which the assimilated and intermarried ערב רב Jews who have no יראת אלהים, based upon the mitzva to have “רחום” upon Amalek; the Torah brit blessing or Curse – Life or Death. Amalek merits “רחום” like as equally do the nations of Canaan or the stubborn and rebellious child. Just as t’shuva the opposite of repentance; so too and how much more so רחום the opposite of pity.

        The Yom Tov of both Rosh HaShenna and Yom Kippur requires that Jews “remember” the oaths sworn by the Avot wherein they cut a Torah oath brit with HaShem through Av tohor time oriented commandments to create תמיד מעשה בראשית the chosen Cohen people just as HaShem swore to childless Avram that his עולם הבא future born seed would number, inclusive of all generations that the seed of the Avot walk upon the face of this earth, that the population of this chosen Cohen people would compare to the number of the Stars the Heavens contain.

        Xtian repentance has zero to do with Av tohor time oriented commandments which require prophetic mussar as their k’vanna. Repentance all about a Charlie Kirk assassination guilt trip: “He died for YOU”, Pauline “Original Sin of Adam” addiction to the farcical fraud of gospel “Good News” substitute theology of a messiah Man/God.

      656. Have encountered a Xtian believer whose opinion merits discussion.

        Frank Hubeny says:

        The important point to remember, Moshe, is that Jesus did – in fact – fulfill the words of the prophets.

        That is why Akiva and company had to alter the genealogies in Genesis 5 and 11 and move the Book of Daniel from the Nev’im to the Ketuvim section of the Tanach. They wanted to pretend that He didn’t and hide the fact that they knew He did.

        So, now that your history has been corrupted, where does that leave you? Is Kabballah enough? Is mussar enough? Are “Case/Rule precedents” enough? It sounds like Akiva sentenced you to perpetual exile.

        You can always be grafted back in unless you decide to talk yourself out of it.

        Romans 11:23 NKJV – 23 And they also, if they do not continue in unbelief, will be grafted in, for God is able to graft them in again.
        _________________________________________
        _________________________________________

        mosckerr says:

        September 11, 2025 at 10:27 pm

        Bunk. Mussar by definition applicable across the board to all generations of Israel. Hence impossible to “fulfill” prophesy as the false gospel narrative lies. Your speculation – simply slander. You offer no evidence to support your opinion – other than that you do not read Hebrew or Aramaic.

        Daniel a mystic not a prophet. The Book of Daniel compares to the relationship which the Gemara has with the Mishna. The generation of Ezra primarily sealed the T’NaCH NOT rabbi Akiva some 600 years later. Oooops try again.

        By the language of the Book of Daniel itself, the story occurs in Babylonian exile. Prophets the “Police enforcers” of the Sanhedrin Judges. The jurisdiction of the Sanhedrin courts – only within the borders of Judea. By extension this applies equally to prophets. Therefore Daniel a mystic and not a prophet. Oooops try again.

        Your revisionist history, simply false. Just that simple. No fancy dance’n. משנה תורה a Torah 2nd given name for the Book of דברים, if you read the Torah in Hebrew you would immediately know this. Mishna Torah means common law. Common law stands on the foundation of precedents/בניני אבות in Hebrew. Just that simple. No fancy dance’n.

        Never in the 2000+ years Jews existed as refugees in Arab or Muslim lands did any Goy court hold either Church or Mosque accountable for war-crimes committed against Humanity – which includes the Jewish people. The Torah defines faith as: Justice pursue. Only under the terms of a Torah blessing: Jews ruling our Homeland, does the potential for the establishment of Sanhedrin common law courts which have the Torah Constitutional mandate of Legislative Review. This fact has zero to do with the theology vomited by Romans 11:23. Justice has nothing to do with any belief system. Torah common law stands upon Case/Rule court precedents. Its this fact which separates Torah common law from Greek/Roman statute law.

        The confusion concerning the Aramaic Book of Daniel, even Rashi and later the Rambam debated this point. Also the Zohar weighs in on the Book of Daniel. Both the Book of Daniel and the Zohar written in Aramaic – and both this and that instruct mysticism. Mesechta Megillah, a tractate on Chag Purim clearly states that Daniel – not a prophet. Rashi on this dof of Gemara concedes that Daniel – not a prophet. But about 8 pages thereafter refers to Daniel as a prophet. This contradiction of Rashi’s commentary merits address.

        By the time of the Reshonim scholars of the Dark and Middle Ages of European g’lut, Jews lacked a clear understanding of T’NaCH prophets. No Reshon validates that Parshat Shoftim and Shotrim in D’varim, that the latter enforcers existed as “Prophets”. Traditional commentaries such as Rashi, Ibn Ezra, and Ramban do not explicitly state that the Shotrim served as prophets in their interpretations of Deuteronomy 16:18. Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, like the classical Rishonim, does not explicitly state that the Shotrim in Deuteronomy 16:18 directly referenced as prophets. The connection between Shotrim and prophetic roles simply not a common interpretation found in traditional commentaries. Most classical sources focus on the Shotrim as law enforcers and assistants to the judges without explicitly linking them to the prophetic function.

        G’lut Jewry, estranged from the realities that the jurisdiction of the Sanhedrin courts – limited to within the borders of Judea. Rav Shwartz, who gave me sh’micha, his beit din erroneously attempted to involve the Sanhedrin court in Jerusalem, in a legal dispute in America involving one of the leaders of the Bnai Noach movement. This fundamental ignorance concerning the jurisdiction of the Sanhedrin court directly contributed to the collapse of Rav Shwartz attempt to restore Sanhedrin (common law) courts in the Jewish state.

        The Yerushalmi includes a dispute Tannaim over whether king David established a small Sanhedrin court in Damascus. The small Sanhedrin courts, based upon the three established by Moshe Rabbeinu on the other side of the Jordan river, from this precedent Torah common law learns that these small Sanhedrin courts, they define the borders of newly conquered lands annexed to the Jewish state.

        The Rambam civil war greatly further eroded rabbinic knowledge of the functions of Torah common law. As a minor judge on the attempt to re-establish the Sanhedrin court system within Israel, I watched in horror as the vast majority of my rabbinic peers voted to base the authority of the Sanhedrin court upon the Rambam’s statute halachic code.

        These examples caused me to reach the conclusion that post the Rambam Civil War that rabbinic Judaism had abandoned the דרך faith to pursue judicial justice as the יסוד responsibility for accepting the revelation of the Torah at Sinai לשמה. While I can validate the arguments made by the RambaN in his מלחמת השם against the Baal HaMaor’s rebuke against the Rif code for reducing the primacy of Talmudic common law in favor of making a far easier halachic definition of religious halachic observance among g’lut Jewry.

        The times absolutely demanded halachic simplifications due to the almost impossibility to travel on a collapsed Roman international road system. None the less, the codes effectively changed the priority established by the Framers of both the T’NaCH and Talmud to serve as the vision model to re-establish Sanhedrin common law lateral courtrooms within the borders of the Jewish Republic which have the Torah Constitutional mandate of Legislative Review. And hence none of the Reshonim commentaries on the Torah prioritized the the definition of Shotrim as “prophets”. A critical and fundamental error of Reshonim scholarship. Consequently, Rashi himself confused, and later referred to the mystic Daniel as a “prophet” in his commentary to Mesechta Megillah.

      660. Idiot has nothing to do with your beliefs. YOU egotistical prick.
        Avatar
        John Neff
        2h agotherealistjuggernaut.wordpress.com
        Prophecy was never about fortune-telling — it was about enforcement.
        Akiva didn’t “alter genealogies.” He preserved the integrity of the brit by refusing to let prophecy collapse into prediction.

        Daniel as mystic proves the point. He could see visions in exile, but he had no Sanhedrin jurisdiction to enforce judgment. That’s why he can never be read as a prophet of the same standing as those who policed Israel inside the land.

        And you’re right — exile confused the categories. Once prophecy was mistaken for prediction, it opened the door for false messiahs and revisionist histories. Once halacha was reduced to codex, it severed itself from mussar and k’vanna.

        The brit doesn’t hang on prediction. It hangs on precedent. And that’s why justice — not genealogies, not visions, not imported creed — remains the only valid measure of Torah faith.

      663. Karen Xtian missionizers promote how their God JeZeus prayed. A simple refutation to this religions propaganda nonsense.

        Your fraudulent gospels, JeZeus does not discern the difference between “praying”–Tehillem from davening–“Torah blessings”. The Talmud of ברכות instructs that a “blessing” exists as an extension of swearing a Torah oath. A Torah oath, defines the k’vanna of the oath sworn בריתות sworn by Avraham Yitzak and Yaacov by which the Avot cut a brit with HaShem to eternally create the chosen Cohen People from nothing by means of Av tohor time-oriented commandments.

        Therefore a blessing requires the kabbalah abstract wisdom known as שם ומלך. The gospel fraud never once brought the שם השם לשמה anywhere in the NT. The first Sinai commandment the greatest of all Torah commandments NOT love – as the false messiah JeZeus taught. Why? Does a Jew do mitzvot לשמה או לא לשמה? This basic question defines how the first Sinai commandment, a commandment at all. The Talmud refers to this fundamental basis of this 1st Sinai commandment – applicable to all the other Torah commandments; explained through the משל metaphor, as expressed though the metaphor of: A Mountain hanging by a Hair.

        The JeZeus fraud false messiah did not grasp, that Tefillah as a Torah, that this mitzva requires the dedication of the Yatzir Ha’Tov within the Heart. Rabbi Yechuda interpreted בכל לבבך within the language of tefillah דאורייתא – meaning the kre’a shma – as the avoda which discerns between the opposing spirits of Yatzir Ha’tov vs. Yatzir Ha’rah within the heart. He based this Mishnaic ruling upon the opening word of Torah בראשית, based upon the פרדס – רמז of ב’ רשאת, which translates as two beginnings. The aggadic story of the creation has two creation stories. These stories introduce the first cause of g’lut-exile as the inherit (think of Yaacov and Esau wrestling within the womb of Rivka) struggle between the Yatzir Ha’Tov vs. the Yatzir Ha’Raw within the “womb” of the heart. Hence the Talmud acknowledges that Tefillah a matter of the heart.

        Whereas JeZeus prayed to some Father in Heaven. The term מלכותkingship: a metaphor wherein the משל king/מלך guides and directions the direction wherein the nation walks. The נמשל logical inference made upon this משל, the Oral Torah middot revealed to Moshe at Horev on Yom Kippur, these tohor middot – they define the drive or spirit which breathes life from within the Yatzir Ha’Tov within the heart! This crucial error definitively proves the NT a Roman Protocols of Zion forgery.

        Currently its the month of Elul. A Chassidic saying at this time: The King is in the field. The נמשל for this משל, Jews attempt to “remember” (ר”ה נקרא יום הזכרון) how the Sin of the Golden Calf wherein the ערב רב-assimilated Jews attempted to impose a substitute replacement theology wherein they referred to the revelation of the 1st Sinai commandment by the word אלהים. The avoda zarah gospel book John 1:1 declares the Word as god. Both substitution theologies define the sin of the Golden Calf; wherein HaShem threatened to make from the seed of Moshe the chosen Cohen people.

        The Torah teaches that following the rebuke of the prophet HaShem made t’shuva and “remembered” the oaths sworn to Avraham Yitzak and Yaacov. Hence the opening blessing of tefillah writes: אלהי אברהם אלהי יצחק ואלהי יעקב. HaShem made t’shuva. A completely different verb from the Xtian idea known as repentance. The Torah precedents for t’shuva: the father can annul a vow made by his minor daughter and the husband can annul a vow made by his wife. Hence a fundamental מאי נפקא מינא distinction made between t’shuva and repentance.

        The Yom Tov of ר”ה revolves around the central axis of blowing the shofar. Tefillah, as a tohor time oriented commandment requires k’vanna. To blow a shofar require the exertion of air blown from the lungs. But to dedicate a blessing/oath of tefillah requires a dedication of the tohor middot (מלכות) of the Yatzir Ha’tov within the heart. Another huge מאי נפקא מינא fundamental distinction of k’vanna. Torah its deep. The two-dimensional NT Roman Protocols of the Elders of Zion counterfeit fraud, an utter abomination.

        The Torah vision of Moshiach – a tohor time oriented commandment like and similar too shabbat – a tohor time oriented commandment. As the latter applies equally to all Jews in every generation to observe and keep so too and how much more so the former! The NT messiah fraud assumes that a lone individual can keep the mitzva of Moshiach. This flagrantly violates the revelation of the Torah at Sinai wherein all generations of the Jewish people accept the Torah.

        Torah as common law stands upon the יסוד of precedents. Rabbi Yishmael explained the concept of precedent through calling them בנין אב in his 13 middot explanation of rabbi Akiva’s פרדס kabbalah of the revelation of the Oral Torah at Horev. During the entire month of Elul Jews daven a prayer known as Slichot, wherein we open the doors revealing the Sefer Torah and repeatedly cry out unto the 13 Oral Torah revelation of the 13 middot: ה’ ה’ אל רחום וחנון וכו.

        Its rather interesting the רמז – which includes Gematria numerical values, 3 + 13 + 3 blessings defines the Order of the Shemone Esrei. This Order interpreted by the Rambam as 613. He learned 613 commandments from the Written Torah. The B’HaG rejected this simplistic reading of a רמז. He discerned that the opening book of בראשית, introduced the Av tohor mitzvot known as time oriented commandments. The next three books of the Torah שמות, ויקרא, ובמדבר introduced the secondary “precedent” positive and negative commandments which do not require k’vanna. And the last book of the Torah introduced the judicial mandate of the Sanhedrin common law lateral courtrooms, known as משנה תורה. Hence the revelation of the Torah at Sinai inclusive of all the Halachic mitzvot elevated through Aggada drosh of prophetic mussar unto Torah Av tohor time oriented commandments! Rabbi Yechuda the Nassi named his Six orders of Sanhedrin judicial rulings as משנה. The latter interpreted the intent of the Book of דברים as the mandate for common law Torah and Talmudic law.

      665. How to study and comprehend both the T’NaCH and Talmud as common law.

        To study Talmudic common law its important to discern fundamental distinctions in scholarship down through the Ages. Perhaps the Rif halachic commentary serves as the split between two distinct bodies of law as different from the Pacific Ocean from the Atlantic Ocean.

        The most essential skill required to understand how to correctly interpret Talmudic common law, the wisdom how to make the required דיוק/logical inference\. Neither T’NaCH common law nor Talmudic common law simply read as if they existed as novels pulled down from the shelf. The skill to study these Primary Sources does not turn to reading commentaries, made upon these Primary Sources which define the classic culture and customs practiced by societies of the chosen Cohen people through Av commandments known as time-oriented mitzvot.

        Even the most shallow cursory translations of the Hebrew T’NaCH and Talmud; Xtianity placed their “word of God” translations upon cult of personality pedestals; they differentiate between the word of God from the words of Man – complete total religious rhetoric nonsense. Still, even a quick glance at their sophomoric “moronic” translations a person “skilled” immediately sees: absolutely no reference to tohor vs. tumah middot; the distinction made between judicial legislative review common law vs. Nicene Creed statute law dictates.

        Their apostle Paul declares “the faithful” as not under the law, oblivious that civilizations without law exist in a state of confusion chaos and political anarchy. Never has any “believer” made the logical דיוק and grasped the fundamental distinctions which separate judicial common law – in possession of legislative review – Torah constitutional mandate, from statute law produced from Parliaments, Legislatures, our Councils – such as the above mentioned Nicene council.

        Torah, as a Constitutional document compares to the US basic law Constitution rather than to religious belief systems. The latter makes its most fundamental appeal to powerful emotions rather than to rational logic. T’NaCH/Talmudic legal reasoning spins around the central axis of פרדס inductive logic as best understood through rabbi Ishmaels 13 methodologies how to interpret the written Jewish Primary Sources which shape and define classic culture and customs practiced by the chosen Cohen people through the k’vanna of doing tohor time-oriented commandments. Herein defines the יסוד upon which all Torah oath britot – pursuit of justice faith – stands.

        Human conflict defines the nature of the opposing Yatzirot within the heart; this fundamental -understanding stands upon the בנין אב-precedent of Yaacov vs. Esau wrestling within the womb of Rivka. The sages perceive the heart as a chamber which houses the two opposing sets of tohor/tuma middot, comparable to the womb which houses developing children.

        The Torah employs korbanot משל as the central (נמשל (דיוק wherein the chosen cohen people as a civilization dedicate differentiated tohor middot holy unto our God. Its the definition of tohor middot wherein the k’vanna of doing tohor time-oriented mitzvot differentiated from תולדות positive and negative Torah commandments and Talmudic halachot – which do not require כוונה.

        The written Torah serves as the יסוד, the NaCH prophets and holy writings the ground floor, and the Talmud and Midrashic sources the 2nd floor of classic rabbinic Primary Sources of scholarship. Next comes the generations of scholars known as the Sovaraim Talmudic scholars 450-600 CE, they further edited the Talmudic texts sealed by Rav Ashi and Ravina. The wisdom of editing most essentially shapes and separates a good newspaper from yellow journalism rags. It seems to me that the Roman forgery new testament, compares both to yellow journalism rags and the Czarist secret police publication of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion.

        This editing skill makes a fundamental דיוק which separates the priority of Cohen culture and custom from תולדות Jewish law and ethics. The latter follows the former, similar to a dog on a leash. Both T’NaCH and Talmud/Midrash stand upon the central kabbalah of פרדס and 13 middot of rabbi Yishmael’s explanation of rabbi Akiva’s פרדס inductive logic sh’itta.

        Fraudulent counterfeit copies of the Torah constitution, converted into religious belief system theologies; the latter directly compare to propaganda rhetoric which defined Josef Goebbels propaganda yellow journalism from 1923 to 1945. This political rhetoric stood upon sensationalist techniques used to popularize the Nazi agenda. The Roman false messiah new testament and Muhammad’s Koran poetry made their appeal to emotions rather than inductive reasoning.

        The Battle of Guadalete, where the Muslim forces, led by Tariq ibn Ziyad, defeated the Visigoth king Roderic; this battle, considered the decisive moment that opened the way for the Muslim conquest of Spain. Following the victory at Guadalete, Muslim forces quickly advanced through the Iberian Peninsula. Within a few years, they captured major cities, including Toledo, Seville, and Córdoba. By the end of 711, much of the southern part of Spain dominated by Muslim culture and customs. The Umayyad Caliphate established this Spanish foothold, which endured for several centuries, leading to significant cultural, social and political changes in the region.

        But conquered Spain made a lasting impact upon Muslim culture as well. The re-discovery of the ancient Greek texts, which the church concealed immediately after Constantine became emperor in 306 CE. This decision by the Church, threatened by the Gods of Greece and Rome, to bury the Greek enlightenment – resulted in a period known as the Dark Ages. The Muslim re-discovery of the ancient Greek enlightenment – cast off Catholic repression, whose policies had destroyed the culture and customs practiced by the ancient Romans, in order to promote the Xtian ‘good news’ gospel. The re-discovery of Greek deductive reasoning both church and mosque now emphatically embraced. Greek deductive reasoning likewise caused the Spanish Jewish ‘Golden Age’ and the European Renaissance to flower and grow.

        The 2nd Sinai Commandment, commonly referred to as the negative commandment of “avoda zarah”, the sages interpreted through the תולדות בניני אבות-precedents of 1. Do not copy Goyim cultures and customs and 2. Do not intermarry with Goyim who reject the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. The definition of avoda zarah, the Av tuma spirit breathed by the Yatzir Haraw within the heart, the rediscovery of the ancient Greek enlightenment re-ignited the Civil War wounds which the lights of Hanukkah designated to remember. Alas g’lut Jewry prioritized the forms of faith rather than the substance of faith. Jews lit the Hanukkah lights as a ritual religious observance rather than as an Av tohor time-oriented commandment which requires prophetic k’vanna.

        The Dark Ages witnessed the destruction of the Roman road system. Scattered Jewish communities lacked the means to communicate with one another. Questions asked to the Geonim in Iraq sometimes took a Century or more before they received a response. This reality caused the rise of the Reshonim scholars. None the less, despite the Reshon innovation, Jewish scattered communities required more immediate Talmudic guidance.

        Talmudic inductive logic requires years of intense scholarship to learn and master. This reality set the stage for the classic debate between the Rabbi Isaac Alfasi, the Rif vs. the Rabbi Meir ben Baruch of Rothenburg, born in Germany, also known as the Baal Hamaor. Rashba, or Rabbi Shlomo ben Abraham ibn Aderet, a medieval rabbi from Spain, active in the late 13th and early 14th centuries. Renowned for his extensive commentaries on the Talmud and his responsa, which addressed a wide range of legal and ethical issues. Rashba, a strong defender of Maimonides’ philosophical approach to Judaism and contributed disastrously to the development of Jewish law during his time. Religious halachic code vs. the disciplined study of the Talmud through precedents, the sh’itta practiced by the Rashi/Baali Tosafot school in France. However, the relationship between the Rif and the Tosafists – more about differing approaches to Talmudic study and halachic decision-making rather than direct criticism.

        The Baal Hamaor criticized the Rif’s prioritization of simple halachic codification because it failed to convey the precedent based scholarship of Talmudic common law. The Rif code did not take the halachot and make a משנה תורה reinterpretation of the language of the Mishna. Herein a succinct summation of the Baal Hamaor’s criticism of the Rif code. The Mishneh Torah by Maimonides (the Rambam) represents a significant shift in the approach to Jewish law, moving towards a more systematic and codified statute law form of halacha that a rare few scholars today argue departs from the traditional Talmudic case-based reasoning.

        These Spanish ‘Golden Age’ rabbis extinguished the lights of Hanukkah. They had forbidden avoda zara “sex” with the re-discovered ancient Greek syllogism deductive reasoning. Ibn Ezra, from Spain, his son converted to Islam. Assimilation and Jewish intermarriage caused the collapse of Spanish Jewry long before the Spanish monarchy forced the mass expulsion of Jews in 1492. Av tuma avoda zara releases Torah curses upon our people similar to those experienced by Par’o in the days of Moshe and Aaron. By definition assimilated ערב רב Jews lack the knowledge and required education to keep and observe the culture and customs which the T’NaCH and Talmud establish as the society of the Cohen people.

        Rabbi Mordechai ben Hillel, known for his work “Mordechai,” failed to differentiation between judicial common law and legislative statute law. In his commentaries, Rabbi Mordechai often focused on the application of Talmudic principles to practical legal situations, some interpret as a watered down form of common law. Why? His scholarship fails to emphasize פרדס inductive logic. He would derive rulings based on precedents and interpretations of the Talmud, reflecting a judicial approach that values case law and established practices. But he failed to validate in the process the kabbalah of rabbi Akiva.

        His work implies a distinction between the authority of rabbinic rulings (which can evolve through judicial interpretation) and the fixed nature of certain laws derived from the Torah or established by the Sanhedrin. This ignores the halacha base Gemara משנה תורה re-interpretations made upon the language of the Mishna based upon a specific sugya of Gemara. He utterly failed to discern Av Torah time-oriented commandments which require k’vanna from secondary positive and negative commandments; or how much more so, Talmudic halachic ritual observances… all of which do not require k’vanna, comparable to positive and negative Torah commandments. This failure/collapse of Torah mitzvot scholarship ultimately caused post Rambam Civil War Jews to fail to read the written Torah as a common law legal system wherein פרדס logic compares positive and negative commandments as precedents in order to elevate a any Torah or Talmudic mitzva unto an Av tohor time-oriented Torah commandment. And likewise Bavli/Yerushalmi halachot as precedents to elevate the language of a given Mishna unto tohor time oriented commandments!

        The French Tosafot school of common law, despite placing the works of the Rambam into נידוי in 1232 utterly collapsed with the public burning of the Talmud in Paris 1242. The Tosafot commentary likewise failed to link Written Torah common law learned through precedents to Talmudic common law whose halachic precedents make a re-interpretations upon the language of the Mishna. Like a blue-print front/top\side views. Precedents function as “the 70 faces to the Torah common law legal system”. This fundamental basic, the Tosafot commentary to the Talmud utterly failed to emphasize.

        Common law compares to the metaphor of opposing rivers, where Statute Law exists as a completely different river from Judicial Common law Legislative Review. Therefore which early Reshonim scholars fundamentally challenged the Rif Code of Halacha for its failure to differentiate between T’NaCH/Talmudic Common law legislative review – as a Constitutional mandate from the Written Torah from Parliament/legislature statute law – which the Rambam, Tur, and Shulkan Aruch codes of statute law utterly and totally undermined? The avoda zara of the latter directly compares to the sin of the Golden Calf which attempted a substitute theology wherein the cursed ערב רב attempted to replace the word אלהים for the 1st Sinai revelation Spirit Divine Presence within the tohor middot which breath life into the Yatzir Ha’Tov within the hearts of the chosen Cohen people throughout all generations.

      667. Idiot courts of common law have nothing to do with religion. Tell a common law judge in England that he’s a priest or monk! YOU idiot.

      668. This the month of Elul, ‘the King is in the Field’. Meaning, its a time for Jews to remember the oaths sworn by the Avot to create time-oriented Av Torah commandments which continually create the chosen Cohen people יש מאין.

        What does Midah k’neged Midah mean? The concept of “Midah k’neged Midah” (measure for measure) is a fundamental principle in Jewish thought and ethics, particularly within the context of the Torah and later interpretations in the Talmud. This principle emphasizes the idea that one’s actions have corresponding consequences, reflecting a moral order in the universe.

        This phrase, divorced from the Torah constitutional mandate which authorizes Great Sanhedrin courts to exercise Legislative Review over the governments of Tribes or even kings of Israel, suggests something akin to an assimilated idea of Karma. Which literally means “action” or “deed” in Sanskrit. It encompasses not just physical actions but also thoughts and intentions. The principle asserts that good actions lead to positive outcomes, while negative actions result in adverse consequences.

        Jews in exile often navigate between their traditional beliefs and the surrounding cultures. This can lead to varying degrees of assimilation, which may affect their understanding and practice of concepts like “Midah k’neged Midah.” Jews in exile often face the challenge of maintaining their identity while adapting to the surrounding cultures. This can lead to a reinterpretation of traditional concepts, such as “Midah k’neged Midah,” as they integrate elements from their host cultures. The assimilation of ideas can sometimes dilute the original meanings or lead to new interpretations that resonate with contemporary experiences.

        Jews living in exile often navigate the complexities of maintaining their cultural and religious identity while adapting to the surrounding societies. This can lead to a reinterpretation of traditional concepts, including Midah k’neged Midah. The integration of surrounding cultural elements can influence how Jewish communities understand and practice their beliefs. This may result in a blending of ideas, where traditional concepts are viewed through the lens of contemporary experiences and values. This dynamic Midah k’neged Midah directly refers to the conflict between the Yatzir Ha’Tov vs. the Yatzir Ha’Raw within the heart. Specifically it contrast tohor vs. tumah middot! ה’ ה’ אל רחום וחנון וכו, the revelation of the 13 Oral Torah middot at Horev on Yom Kippur serves as the יסוד meaning of Midah k’neged Midah. Yet g’lut Jews cursed by the Torah curse of not obeying the Torah לשמה, they can not discern one tohor middah from another or even tohor middot vs tumah middot in the eternal struggle of Yaacov and Esau within the womb of Rivka.

      675. Like the war criminal who leads you, you extremist victims of the holocaust now, ironically support genocide. The bullied turn into bullies!

      676. Nothing “like” Hitler compared to Bibi moron. Poland did not invade through a surprise attack like the Japanese invaded the US on Dec 7th 1941. To compare the Nazis with the Japanese during WWII – a valid comparison. To equivocate Bibi to Hitler = Holocaust Denial. Fuck YOU.

      678. You clearly have a view. Somehow you seem able to justify the starving and bombing of children and shooting of innocents. Instead of being like a stupid ten year old why don’t explain why it is alright and why the treatment of the Palestinians doesn’t equate with what the Nazis did?

      679. It’s the month of Elul. The King’s in the Field – an old Hassidic idea. Jews come and stand before an opened Sefer Torah and cry the 13 middot revelation of the Oral Torah at Horev to express our t’shuva!

        DOREEN DOTAN’S ARCHIVE

        A different take on Israel and Other Important Issues

        עדן
        ________________________________
        ________________________________
        4th Oral Torah middah רחום, learns from the בניני אבות-precedents commandments 1. to obliterate all people of Canaan 2. the stubborn and rebellious child, 3. the eternal war upon Amalek. The tohor middah of רחום pleads that HaShem distinguish between the תורה ברית which separated ברכה מן ארור. All like vs death henges upon this most basic distinction! Its Ellul now. Jews open up the Sefer Torah and cry out the 13 Oral Torah Middot, to remember the sin of the Golden Calf as our תשובה על יום הזכרון!!!! Tough תשובה if a Jew can’t separate and discern רחום from חנון!

      692. All the many variables of Xtianity, simply amount to theological word salads that leave a shit taste in the mouth.

        Arminianism

        Curtis Narimatsu

        AI —

        Lutheran seminary students denounce Arminian theology primarily because it undermines the foundational Reformation principle of sola gratia, or “grace alone”. While both traditions believe salvation is a gift from God, they disagree fundamentally on the nature of human free will and its role in accepting that gift. 

        Core Lutheran objections to Arminianism

        The bondage of the will: Following Martin Luther’s treatise On the Bondage of the Will, Lutherans teach that the human will is “in bondage” to sin and is spiritually dead, utterly incapable of initiating a “decision for Christ” on its own. Arminianism, in contrast, teaches that God’s grace enables a person to either accept or reject the gospel through their own free will. For Lutherans, this suggests that the sinner contributes to their own salvation, which conflicts with their view that salvation is entirely God’s work.

        The nature of faith: In Lutheran theology, faith is not a human decision but a gift created in a person’s heart by the Holy Spirit through the gospel and baptism. This perspective views faith as an “empty hand” that receives God’s saving grace, not a meritorious act of human cooperation. Lutherans reject the Arminian view, which can be interpreted as making faith a condition or a human contribution to justification.

        Unconditional election: Lutherans confess the doctrine of unconditional election, agreeing with Calvinists that God’s choice to save believers is based entirely on His grace and the merits of Christ, not on any foreseen faith or action by the individual. They diverge from Arminianism, which teaches that election is conditional upon God’s foreknowledge of a person’s future faith. For Lutherans, the Arminian view subtly reintroduces human merit into salvation.

        Distinction between law and gospel: Denouncing Arminius allows Lutheran seminarians to preserve the sharp distinction between law and gospel.

        The law tells humanity that it is sinful and unable to save itself.

        The gospel proclaims that salvation is a free and unearned gift from God.

        By teaching that a person plays a role in their own salvation, Lutherans argue that Arminianism conflates the law and the gospel, obscuring the radical freeness of God’s grace. 

        A point of agreement, but with different reasoning

        Interestingly, Lutherans and Arminians often agree that a true Christian can fall away from the faith. However, the reasons for this belief are different and highlight their core theological differences: 

        Arminianism: Views falling away as the reverse side of one’s initial choice for Christ, since salvation depends on the individual’s free will.

        Lutheranism: Views falling away as the result of human rejection of God’s grace, which is always resistible. They reject the notion that a person has the “ability” to reject Christ, instead viewing it as a spiritual act of drowning for someone already spiritually dead. 

        Incompatibility at a foundational level

        While some might mistakenly view Lutheranism as a middle ground between Calvinism and Arminianism, Lutheranism is fundamentally incompatible with the core principles of Arminian theology. In the Lutheran view, the Arminian focus on human freedom in salvation is seen as a move away from the centrality of God as the sole actor in a person’s salvation. 

        Understanding the nuances of these theological positions is essential. To go a bit deeper, would you like to explore the difference in how Lutherans and Calvinists view predestination and election, or learn more about the Lutheran doctrine of the means of grace?

        A Lutheran Response to Arminianism by Rick Ritchie June 29, 2007, in Modern Reformation

        Since the seventeenth century, Calvinism has been identified with its five-point reply to the Arminian party at the Synod of Dort. Calvinists often complain that this summary of their theology, though accurate in expressing the Calvinists’ disagreement with their Arminian opponents, presents a truncated view of what Calvinism really is. Where in the five points do we hear of the covenant or of union with Christ? To properly understand a theology, we must not only know what it says to its opponents, but we need to know how it is to be presented on its own terms.

        If a five-point summary is an awkward way to present Calvinism, it is downright foreign to Lutheranism. This is not because Lutheranism lacks a defined doctrine of election. (It certainly has one.) God’s gracious election of certain individuals to salvation was affirmed in Article X of the Formula of Concord, the last of the Lutheran confessions. The darker side of predestination has also been considered. As the great Lutheran theologian Hermann Sasse wrote,

        Lutheran theology knows about the God of Predestination: This God who makes us responsible for demands which we cannot fulfill, who asks us questions which we cannot answer, who created us for good and yet leaves us no other choice than to do evil-this is the Deus absconditus. This is the God of absolute Predestination. This is the God who hardened Pharaoh’s heart, who hated Esau even before he was born, the Potter who fashions pots and before whom one shrinks-and who, nevertheless, thunders in pitiless sovereignty at these unhappy creatures, ‘Tua culpa!’ Thine is the guilt! (1) ….
        ______________________
        ______________________
        The relationship between Lutheranism and the Nazis, especially during the Holocaust (Shoah), is a disgrace exposing the bankruptcy of its dead theology. Lutheran leaders and institutions in Germany during the Nazi era either supported or remained silent about the regime’s actions, especially concerning the Jewish Nazi abomination.

        The debate over Arminian theology and the principle of sola gratia (grace alone) highlights internal theological disagreements, but it can also be seen as a distraction from addressing the more pressing moral failures of the tradition during critical historical moments. This too exposes the bankruptcy of religious rhetoric. Grace, the translation of חנון in Hebrew, means the commitment to dedicate Oral Torah middot to shape and determine how a person socially behaves and interacts with his/her people in the future! This sola gratia gobbledygook religion rhetoric – simply pie in the sky narishkeit nonsense.

        The Reformation, which emphasized grace and faith, remembered for the barbaric 30 Year War! The actions of the Lutheran church during the Shoah have confirmed “by their fruits you shall know them” … the Apple does not fall far from the tree – condemnation. The church, in all its many variable denominations, utterly bankrupt. Never has any Xtian country had a public courtroom hold the church accountable for war-crimes. Never has any State Court ever condemned the church for the 3 Century ghetto gulags of western European Jewry!

      693. Orthodox Judaism: Off the דרך.

        madlik·madlik.com

        Intentional and Unintentional Holiness
        Are there times were we should strive not to be present or in the moment? As we enter the month of Elul and approach the High Holidays, many of us instinctively tighten our grip on spiritual practices. We double down …
        __________________________
        __________________________
        Pie in the Sky religious rhetoric narishkeit. Why do Yidden open up the Torah to public vision and call out repeatedly the 13 middot when Jews NEVER question: “What הבדלה separates one Oral Torah middah from another? Its these Oral Torah middot which define the k’vanna of all time-oriented commandments such as kre’a shma דאורייתא and tefillah דרבנן. Both this or that require tohor middot as the k’vanna of all mitzvot from the Torah and Talmud, to elevate these unto tohor time-oriented commandments from the Torah according to the B’HaG.

      697. The Holocaust occurred. Genocide is occurring right now. You are like the German people in the 1940s who denied what was going on right in front of their eyes.

      699. Oral Torah as revealed to Moshe at Horev following the sin of the Golden Calf, openly rejects ancient Greek theories of syllogism deductive reasoning. The kabbalah of Rabbi Akiva’s פרדס logic format, especially as explained by Rabbi Yishmael’s 13 middot of logical interpretation strategies – together they define the revelation of the Oral Torah at Horev as an inductive reasoning logic format.

        The T’NaCH functions as a common law system, where the texts establish precedents through case and rule comparisons. This suggests a structured legal framework that informs Jewish law and practice. The Gemarah’s commentary on the Mishna is highlighted as a method of interpreting Jewish law through inductive reasoning, which provides a dynamic – as oppose and contrasted by Greek deductive static reasoning – multi-dimensional understanding of legal principles.

        The common law of the T’NaCH prioritizes Prophetic mussar whereas the Gemara focuses upon ritual halacha as precedents. The authors of the New Testament misunderstood the nature of the T’NaCH, particularly in their claim that Jesus “fulfilled” the prophecies. This is framed as a misinterpretation of the role of Torah prophets, who were enforcers of law rather than predictors of the future.

        The distinction between the roles of prophets and legal authorities in the T’NaCH is a central theme, suggesting that the prophetic function is often misrepresented by later NT framers. The consequences of this basic fundamental error: the Xtian framers intended to establish a religious belief system whereas the Framers of the T’NaCH envisioned establishment of Sanhedrin courts common law. The complexity of this latter objective, difficult for Goyim to grasp, primarily because they lack the Talmud as a point of reference – how to understand the language of the T’NaCH as the Primary Sources of Jewish law. Lacking the Aggadic narrative provided by the Talmud, Goyim simply fail to understand that the purpose of the Aggadic stories – they explore the language of Prophetic mussar to provide the “k’vanna” which defines the purpose and meaning of all Talmudic Aggadic stories.

        The Talmud compares to a loom with its warp & weft threads. Weaving interpreted prophetic mussar as the k’vanna of halachic ritualism – this defines not only how to make an aliyah\elevation of rabbinic ritual mitzvot observances unto Torah commandments, but this same wisdom equally applies to elevate lower positive and negative Torah commandments to Av tohor time-oriented Torah commandments! Goyim have never grasped the depth & scope of Torah commandments within the Torah. They never conceived nor grasped that Moshe as the Framer of the Torah organized these 5 Books to function as the Constitution of the Republic of 12 Tribes. Torah as a Constitutional Basic Law of the Chosen Cohen Peoples’ Republic — a far different vision from the Pauline ‘Original Sin’ addiction of Man for some imaginary mythical Harry Potter God/messiah to save Humanity from their sins.

        Prophetic Mussar vs. Ritual Halacha: T’NaCH interprets prophetic mussar; Gemarah interprets ritual law as the culture and customs observed by the nation of the chosen Cohen People. Avoda zarah interpreted as such to mean: 1. The Cohen people have a negative commandment NOT to follow, much more so embrace, the cultures and customs practiced by Goyim civilizations which do not accept the opening First TWO Sinai commandments.

        This profound understanding of the revelation of the Torah at Sinai starkly contrasts with the Rambam’s pathetic perversion of Aggadah up-rooted totally out of context from mesechta Sanhedrin concerning the 7 mitzvot applicable to Gere Toshavim who temporarily dwell within the lands of Judea; as opposed to the despised Goyim refugee populations, who likewise temporarily reside within the borders of Judea. Mesechta Baba Kama instructs that the latter dhimmi refugee populations enjoyed no legal protections. If a Jew damaged their persons or property – these “illegal aliens” possessed no legal “Torah Constitutional” right to sue the damager Israel in any Jewish Court of Law within the borders of Judea. As a point of reference: Jews, as despised refugees in Europe and Muslim countries for 2000+ years – political exiles, dhimmi refugee populations – no Goy Court in Xtian or Muslim lands ever once held criminal war-crimes committed by the Church or Mosque priests or sheiks accountable. G’lut/exiled Jews had no legal rights to sue – NOT either Church or Mosque in any Goyim courts of law for 2000+ years of g’lut/exile.

        Viewed from this basic historical context, the Talmud of mesechta Baba Kama makes complete and total sense. Hence mesechta Sanhedrin addresses the legal rights of Gere Toshav strangers to sue Jewish damagers in Jewish courts of law; whereas mesechta Baba Kama excludes dhimmi foreign alien “wet-backs” from the ”privilege” of legal judicial rights to requests from a Jewish Court to enforce fair compensation of damages they suffered from an Israel. During the Dark and Middle Ages, a similar custom practiced upon dhimmi exiled Jews; writs of privileges issued to Jews by princes and church officials. These writs of privileges directly compare to mesechta Sanhedrin’s 7 mitzvot “bnai Noach”.

        The fundamental error of basic Talmudic common law scholarship made by Rambam’s decision to “convert” the Talmud into Roman statute law; this absolute error stands upon the copied-assimilated Av tumah avoda zara wherein this rabbi embraced the error followed by the Samaritans, Tzeddukim, Karaim, Reform & Conservative Judaism today. This Av tumah avoda zara generated a domino effect upon all down-stream generations of Jewry. The Talmud refers to this type of disaster as ירידות הדורות-descending generations.

        Later down stream rabbinic Judaism made a error and interpreted this Talmudic concept as the inability of later generations to challenge the opinions made by earlier generations; something comparable and akin to the Catholic idea of the infallibility of the Pope — utter and total narishkeit stupidity. Pope Pius XII stands as proof witness of this absolutely worthless טיפש פשט-bird brained idea. Rashi’s commentary to the Chumash challenged the opinion made by Targum Onkelos as erroneous. How could Rashi argue against a contemporary of Rabbi Yechuda – the author of the Mishna? Answer: In matters of logic, no generation has a lock monopoly by which it can dictate its logic over later generations.

        Genesis 1:1, Rashi discusses the creation narrative and contrasts his interpretation with that of Targum Onkelos. This Rashi opinion nails the Arab rejection of political Zionism’s quest to achieve Jewish self-determination within a restored Jewish State in the lands of Judea. Rashi believed that later generations could offer valid interpretations that might differ from earlier authorities, including Targum Onkelos. He emphasized that logic and understanding of the text naturally develop and evolve.

        Rashi’s commentary on בראשית א:ב — והארץ היתה תהו ובהו. Targum Onkelos translates as: איר אתכללו – “it was desolate”. Rashi argues that Targum Onkelos’ interpretation does not capture the full meaning of the Hebrew terms. He explains that “תֹהוּ” refers to a state of emptiness or chaos, while “בֹהוּ” refers to a state of void or nothingness. Rashi emphasizes that the two terms convey distinct concepts that are not adequately represented in Onkelos’ translation.

        Exodus 12:6: Rashi comments on the phrase regarding the timing of the Passover sacrifice. Targum Onkelos translates it in a way that Rashi finds problematic. Rashi argues that the translation does not align with the intent of the Hebrew text, suggesting that Onkelos’ interpretation – not accurate in this context. This example illustrates Rashi’s approach to engaging with earlier interpretations, including those of Targum Onkelos, and his belief that later scholars can offer valid critiques based on their logical insights. Based upon the premise that no one generation owns a lock and key monopoly of logic.
        “עד יום עשותו – עד יום שיבואו ישראל לידי עשייתו, ולא עד יום שיבואו לידי אכילתו, כמו שתרגם אונקלוס: ‘עד יום שיבואו ישראל לידי אכילתו’.”

        In his commentary, Rashi points out that Targum Onkelos interprets the verse as referring to the day of eating the Passover sacrifice, while Rashi understood this verse as the day of its preparation or offering. This illustrates Rashi’s critical engagement with Onkelos’ translation.

        In בראשית א:ב, the phrase “והארץ היתה תהו ובהו” is translated as “איר אתכללו,” meaning “it was desolate.” This translation captures the essence of the Hebrew term “תהו ובהו,” which conveys a sense of emptiness and chaos.

        In contrast, in דברים לג:ב, the phrase “מן אִתְּכַּלְּלוּ” translates to “from the mountain of Seir.” Here, “אִתְּכַּלְּלוּ” is derived from a different root and refers to a geographical location rather than a state of being. The context of this verse is about God’s revelation from Sinai, and the term is used to indicate a specific place, rather than a descriptive state. Rashi states that Onkelos’ translation is incorrect because it implies that the verse is referring to a physical location rather than the spiritual significance of HaShem’s revelation. Rashi emphasizes that the term “מִסֵּעִיר” should be understood in a different context, focusing on the divine aspect rather than a geographical one.

        בראשית א:ב — והארץ היתה תהו ובה Targum Onkelos translates as: איר אתכללו – “it was desolate”. Whereas דברים לג:ב: ויאמר ה’ מסיני בא ושרח מסעיר למו — Targum Onkelos translates this as “מִן אִתְּכַּלְּלוּ” (from the mountain of Seir)? In בראשית א:ב, the phrase “והארץ היתה תהו ובהו” is translated as “איר אתכללו,” meaning “it was desolate.” This translation captures the essence of the Hebrew term “תהו ובהו,” which conveys a sense of emptiness and chaos.

        In contrast, in דברים לג:ב, the phrase “מן אִתְּכַּלְּלוּ” translates to “from the mountain of Seir.” Here, “אִתְּכַּלְּלוּ” is derived from a different root and refers to a geographical location rather than a state of being. The context of this verse is about God’s revelation from Sinai, and the term is used to indicate a specific place rather than a descriptive state. Thus, the variations in translation reflect the different contexts and meanings of the words used in each verse. The שרש\root – כ-ל-ל conveys meanings related to completeness or inclusion. In this context, it refers to a geographical location, specifically indicating a place from which something originates or emerges.

        This contrasts with the root of “תֹהוּ” and “בֹהוּ” in Genesis 1:2, which conveys a sense of chaos and emptiness, highlighting the different contexts and meanings in Rashi’s commentary and the translations provided by Targum Onkelos. This example of Rashi’s dispute with a Tanna illistrates the classic error assimilated to ancient Greek cultures and customs the Rambam erred when he interpreted the word ONE in kre’a shma means “monotheism”. Monotheism violates the 2nd Sinai commandment. Furthermore, mesechta Avoda Zarah opens with the understanding that prior to the generation of Noach that the Goyim had utterly rejected the oath brit alliance.

        The Torah of בראשית opens with the Name אלהים (the substitute word translation of the Divine Presence Spirit word of both the שם השם עצמו as well as the Orev 13 Oral Torah middot wherein Jews to this day during the month of Elul. For example: tefillah a matter of the heart … and to make a blessing requires שם ומלכות. The Mitzva of blowing the Shofar on ר”ה make a מאי נפקא מינא הבדלה which separates and distinguishes between air blown from the lungs from tohor spirits blown from the Yatzir Ha’Tov from within the heart. דכתיב: גכל לבבך.

        On Elul Jews likewise separate t’shuva from repentance. Similar words on superficial appearance, like brit and covenant. T’shuva “remembers” the Sin of the Golden Calf, like Amalek which plagues Jews in all generations with its hateful antisemitism. We remember that HaShem – measure for measure – threatened to make a substitute theology idolatry and replace the oath sworn Cohen seed of the Avot with the seed of Moshe Rabbeinu “eye for an eye” for the Israel ערב רב replacement theology with substituted אלהים “word” for the שם השם לשמה Divine Presence Spirit which quickens the Yatzir HaTov within the heart, through the dedication of tohor Oral Torah middot.

        Hence a blessing requires מלכות – the dedication of korbanot middot לשמה. Herein explains why the Book of בראשית opens with the word name אלהים rather than the Spirit Name שם השם לשמה as commanded in the first commandment of the Sinai revelation; the בראשית story opens prior to the oath brit which creates continually the chosen Cohen seed of the Avot through tohor Av time-oriented commandments which require the מלכות dedication of Oral Torah spirit middot through the Yatzir Ha’Tov.

        Goyim, both Xtians and Allah repentance by contrast only refers to personal regret. This interpretation goes well with the Xtian guilt trip theology of “He died for you”. In like manner, ברית refers to an oath alliance which function as the יסוד of the Republic of the 12 Tribes; wheras covenant implies some vague connection, which if “shattered” some foreign alien other God could substitute Goyim as the “New Israel” or Universal monotheistic God. The Rambam avoda zarah assimilated and embraced the Muslim idea of a universal monotheistic God. He rejected mesechta Avoda Zarah which understands the God of Sinai as a local Tribal God based upon the conclusion that the Goyim never accepted the revelation, meaning first two opening commandments of Sinai as John 1:1 proves, of the the Torah at Sinai.

      702. I can’t see how opposing genocide makes me a holocaust denier. I think you need to start talking sense instead of this repeating crap.

      708. All the many variables of Xtianity, simply amount to theological word salads that leave a shit taste in the mouth.

        Arminianism

        Curtis Narimatsu

        AI —

        Lutheran seminary students denounce Arminian theology primarily because it undermines the foundational Reformation principle of sola gratia, or “grace alone”. While both traditions believe salvation is a gift from God, they disagree fundamentally on the nature of human free will and its role in accepting that gift. 

        Core Lutheran objections to Arminianism

        The bondage of the will: Following Martin Luther’s treatise On the Bondage of the Will, Lutherans teach that the human will is “in bondage” to sin and is spiritually dead, utterly incapable of initiating a “decision for Christ” on its own. Arminianism, in contrast, teaches that God’s grace enables a person to either accept or reject the gospel through their own free will. For Lutherans, this suggests that the sinner contributes to their own salvation, which conflicts with their view that salvation is entirely God’s work.

        The nature of faith: In Lutheran theology, faith is not a human decision but a gift created in a person’s heart by the Holy Spirit through the gospel and baptism. This perspective views faith as an “empty hand” that receives God’s saving grace, not a meritorious act of human cooperation. Lutherans reject the Arminian view, which can be interpreted as making faith a condition or a human contribution to justification.

        Unconditional election: Lutherans confess the doctrine of unconditional election, agreeing with Calvinists that God’s choice to save believers is based entirely on His grace and the merits of Christ, not on any foreseen faith or action by the individual. They diverge from Arminianism, which teaches that election is conditional upon God’s foreknowledge of a person’s future faith. For Lutherans, the Arminian view subtly reintroduces human merit into salvation.

        Distinction between law and gospel: Denouncing Arminius allows Lutheran seminarians to preserve the sharp distinction between law and gospel.

        The law tells humanity that it is sinful and unable to save itself.

        The gospel proclaims that salvation is a free and unearned gift from God.

        By teaching that a person plays a role in their own salvation, Lutherans argue that Arminianism conflates the law and the gospel, obscuring the radical freeness of God’s grace. 

        A point of agreement, but with different reasoning

        Interestingly, Lutherans and Arminians often agree that a true Christian can fall away from the faith. However, the reasons for this belief are different and highlight their core theological differences: 

        Arminianism: Views falling away as the reverse side of one’s initial choice for Christ, since salvation depends on the individual’s free will.

        Lutheranism: Views falling away as the result of human rejection of God’s grace, which is always resistible. They reject the notion that a person has the “ability” to reject Christ, instead viewing it as a spiritual act of drowning for someone already spiritually dead. 

        Incompatibility at a foundational level

        While some might mistakenly view Lutheranism as a middle ground between Calvinism and Arminianism, Lutheranism is fundamentally incompatible with the core principles of Arminian theology. In the Lutheran view, the Arminian focus on human freedom in salvation is seen as a move away from the centrality of God as the sole actor in a person’s salvation. 

        Understanding the nuances of these theological positions is essential. To go a bit deeper, would you like to explore the difference in how Lutherans and Calvinists view predestination and election, or learn more about the Lutheran doctrine of the means of grace?

        A Lutheran Response to Arminianism by Rick Ritchie June 29, 2007, in Modern Reformation

        Since the seventeenth century, Calvinism has been identified with its five-point reply to the Arminian party at the Synod of Dort. Calvinists often complain that this summary of their theology, though accurate in expressing the Calvinists’ disagreement with their Arminian opponents, presents a truncated view of what Calvinism really is. Where in the five points do we hear of the covenant or of union with Christ? To properly understand a theology, we must not only know what it says to its opponents, but we need to know how it is to be presented on its own terms.

        If a five-point summary is an awkward way to present Calvinism, it is downright foreign to Lutheranism. This is not because Lutheranism lacks a defined doctrine of election. (It certainly has one.) God’s gracious election of certain individuals to salvation was affirmed in Article X of the Formula of Concord, the last of the Lutheran confessions. The darker side of predestination has also been considered. As the great Lutheran theologian Hermann Sasse wrote,

        Lutheran theology knows about the God of Predestination: This God who makes us responsible for demands which we cannot fulfill, who asks us questions which we cannot answer, who created us for good and yet leaves us no other choice than to do evil-this is the Deus absconditus. This is the God of absolute Predestination. This is the God who hardened Pharaoh’s heart, who hated Esau even before he was born, the Potter who fashions pots and before whom one shrinks-and who, nevertheless, thunders in pitiless sovereignty at these unhappy creatures, ‘Tua culpa!’ Thine is the guilt! (1) ….
        ______________________
        ______________________
        The relationship between Lutheranism and the Nazis, especially during the Holocaust (Shoah), is a disgrace exposing the bankruptcy of its dead theology. Lutheran leaders and institutions in Germany during the Nazi era either supported or remained silent about the regime’s actions, especially concerning the Jewish Nazi abomination.

        The debate over Arminian theology and the principle of sola gratia (grace alone) highlights internal theological disagreements, but it can also be seen as a distraction from addressing the more pressing moral failures of the tradition during critical historical moments. This too exposes the bankruptcy of religious rhetoric. Grace, the translation of חנון in Hebrew, means the commitment to dedicate Oral Torah middot to shape and determine how a person socially behaves and interacts with his/her people in the future! This sola gratia gobbledygook religion rhetoric – simply pie in the sky narishkeit nonsense.

        The Reformation, which emphasized grace and faith, remembered for the barbaric 30 Year War! The actions of the Lutheran church during the Shoah have confirmed “by their fruits you shall know them” … the Apple does not fall far from the tree – condemnation. The church, in all its many variable denominations, utterly bankrupt. Never has any Xtian country had a public courtroom hold the church accountable for war-crimes. Never has any State Court ever condemned the church for the 3 Century ghetto gulags of western European Jewry!

      715. The רמב”ם perverted the Torah faith. His works generated a ירידות הדורות-domino effect-upon all downstream generations of the chosen Cohen people.
        ________________________Israel Information Center Ithacainternationalscholars·israelinformationcenterithaca.wordpress.comRemedies as recommended by Israel Information Center Ithaca. Moreover, ask the right question to AI and you will get an algorithm Rabbi’s answer. There is a Rabbi whose responsible is out there we should find out who ?A comprehensive comparison indicate where the start should begin. Did you mean: the thirteen principles of Jewish faith how it was applied to resolve identify crisis which
        ________________________
        Never begin with the assimilated Rambam whose works substitute the 3 part syllogism deductive logic of Aristotle from the kabbalah of rabbi Akiva and rabbi Yishmael’s פרדס וי”ג מידדות respectively. The Rambam Yad perverted T’NaCH/Talmudic “Common law”, replaced by Greek\Roman “Statute law”. The two legal system entirely and totally different. The Rambam substitute assimilationist – a direct negative commandment profaned – rejects the Gemara of mesechta Avoda Zarah wherein the sages teach that in the generations prior to Noach, Goyim abandoned the oath brit alliance!

        .בראשית לה There this Gemara introduces the Aggadah of offering of the Torah to different nations. It mentions that God offered the Torah to various peoples, including Ishmael and Esau, who both rejected it upon hearing its commandments. Similar themes, in Midrash Tanchuma, and Midrash Rabbah, where God offers the Torah to the descendants of Ishmael and Esau. They inquire about the contents of the Torah and, upon learning about the prohibitions against stealing and murder, they declined the offer.

        Therefore the revelation of the Torah at Sinai reveals a local Tribal God. ואמר רבי אלעזר: כל אומות העולם לא קיבלו את התורה, אלא ישראל בלבד קיבלו את התורה — שבת פח. Yet the Rambam embraced Islam’s Koran of a Universal God/Monotheism. The latter directly profanees the Pesach teaching of 10 plagues wherein HaShem judged the Gods of Egypt, which underscores the 2nd Sinai commandment! If only Allah lives as God, then the 2nd commandment commanded in vain.

        Belief in HaShem – no such commandment. Only the theological creeds which shape and dominate the “daughter religions” of Xtianity and Islam make belief systems the crux of faith. What constitutes the Greatest Torah commandment? Answer: the First Commandment at Sinai. Why? How does אנכי יצאו לכם ממצרים — שמות כ:ב, upon this one commandment hang – like a mountain hung by a hair? This commandment on casual observance, a statement rather than a commandment! How then does it even merit the status of a Torah commandment?

        Answer: Does a person accept this commandment לשמה או לא לשמה? Person’s, like all g’lut Jews – if they keep commandments at all, they do so לא לשמה. Why? The Torah curse of being in g’lut. Therefore the assimilated rabbi Rambam introduced his 13 middot of Jewish faith in his introduction to the Mishna of Sanhedrin. Assimilation and intermarriage represent the two primary Avot tumah which define avoda zarah.

      721. the Labour government said it was a question for the courts, not a national government if Israel had committed a genocide. You should feel ashamed. The world is talking about it!

      725. The stark contrast how Goyim read their sophomoric moronic bible translations vs Torah common law which stands upon precedents.
        __________________________________________________

        Intentional Faith
        Intentional Faith·pastorhogg.net

        Resting in Reverence
        As the day ends, Psalm 2:10–11 reminds us to serve the Lord with reverence, acknowledging His holiness and unshakable rule. This evening is an opportunity to…..
        _______________________________________________
        Interpreting Tehillem ב. Man struggles with tumah middot within his Yatzir Ha’Raw. This struggle – Universal within all Mankind. If National rulers struggle with their tumah Yatzir how much more so the common man on the street. What does “kingship in Zion” refer to? As a physical king gives direction to the nation so too and how much more so the struggling Yatzirot within the heart. Who wears the crown of the king? The tohor Yatzir Ha’Tov or the tumah Yatzir Ha’Raw?

        Israel’s acceptance of the oath brit at Sinai done לשמה או לא לשמה? Clearly the Wilderness generation who accepted the Torah at Sinai did so לא לשמה. Forty days following the Torah revelation the ערב רב שאין לכם יראת שמים imposed a substitute theology of the WORD אלהים which replaced the first Sinai Torah acceptance – שם השם לשמה. Had the Wilderness generation accepted the Torah revelation at Sinai לשמה, they would not have given the assimilated and intermarried Israel/Egyptian ערב רב the time of day. But instead all the sages of the Great Sanhedrin, except for Aaron, MURDERED.

        A blessing requires שם ומלכות. The charge of the King, to direct tohor spirits and crown the Yatzir Ha’Tov king within the heart. Superficial reading of Tehillem ב through the sophomoric moronic translation that “KING” refers to a physical/historical son of David – utterly perverts the k’vanna and mussar instructed by this Tehillem! The admonition to kings and judges which ב rebukes, directly addresses the struggle of opposing tohor vs tumah spirits within the Yatzirot within the heart.

        Divine Law, not some pie in the Sky “Word of God”, but rather the pursuit of righteous judicial justice among our people. Fair compensation of damages inflicted defines Torah faith. Only through justice can an Israel trust another Israel following a fight/Civil War among ourselves. The metaphor “Kissing the son”, hence refers to the נמשל of tohor middot which the Yatzir Ha’tov breathes.

        Tefillah a matter of the heart not the place or location where one prays. How much more so NOT an issue of National leaders but rather the Yatzir Tohor within our hearts! Justice can never prevail over our own interests if we do not dedicate our lives, comparable to a korban dedicated upon the altar in Jerusalem, to the righteous pursuit of justice among our people.

        The concept of judicial awe as an ethical restraint is vital for legitimate jurisprudence. Instructs the mussar, that without a deep respect for remembering the oaths sworn by the Avot wherein they swore and cut an oath brit with HaShem, to create the chosen Cohen people through the performance of time oriented Torah commandments, that no generation of Israel can dominate the tumah Yatzir within all our hearts.

        Tehillem ב stands upon the T’NaCH precedents of צדק צדק תרדוף and 2 Chronicles 19:6–7 (Jehoshaphat’s reforms): “Consider what you do, for you judge not for man but for HaShem… let the fear of HaShem be upon you.” Impossible to learn and interpret Tehillem without learning it back to similar Case/Rule precedents found within the T’NaCH itself. The tuma Yatzir continually seduces Man to make a shallow reactionary reading of T’NaCH verses snatched like Israeli hostages by Hamas on Oct 7th. This tumah Yatzir defines how the Roman NT gospel fraud makes a superficial and
        inconsequential symbolism of p’sukim robbed and raped out of context from the Books of the Prophets and the NT framers declare that their Man/God JeZeus fulfilled the words of the prophets.

      731. You clearly have a view. Somehow you seem able to justify the starving and bombing of children and shooting of innocents. Instead of being like a stupid ten year old why don’t explain why it is alright and why the treatment of the Palestinians doesn’t equate with what the Nazis did?

      733. Arab Revisionist History duplicates New Testament revisionist history of the Hebrew T’NaCH.
        ______________________________________
        The Villages Group: Cooperation in Israel-Palestine

        Sep 4/5 2025: Settlers Perpetrate Massive night Pogrom at Khalet a-Dab’e
        Khalet a-Dab’e is in the heart of Masafer Yatta. Somewhat unusually for the region’s Palestinian villages, it sits atop a high hill. That could be one reason why the military and settlers have targeted it so relentlessly. Last week on the night between Thursday and Friday (September 4/5), dozens of settlers descended upon Khalet a-Dab’e and perpetrated a pogrom. At least 50-60 criminals, apparently from the entire region’s settlements and outposts, entered the village and immediately assaulted residents of all ages with bats and iron rods.
        ______________________________________
        Dhimmi Arab refugee populations absolutely reject, together with all other Arab and Muslim countries which refuse to recognize the Jewish state post ’48 and ’67; Jewish equal rights to achieve self determination as defined by the 1917 Balfour Daration and the 1922 Palestine Mandate. Ottoman land laws, which remain on the books in the modern Jewish state today, reject non Ottoman Muslims, both Jews and Arabs from owning Ottoman lands. Dhimmi stateless Arab refugees promote revisionist history, in point of fact during Ottoman rule Arabs existed at best as share-croppers.

        Arab Muslim rejection of Zionism rooted in Arab rejection of Jews equal rights to achieve self-determination in the Middle East. All Arab countries opposed and voted against the UN General Assembly vote of 1948 wherein 2/3rds of all UN member states recognized Jews equal rights to achieve self determination in the Middle East as the Palestinian Mandate originally authorized.

        The status of dhimmi Arab populations in the context of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is complex, with many Palestinians identifying as refugees or stateless individuals due to the historical events surrounding the establishment of Israel.

      736. You clearly have a view. Somehow you seem able to justify the starving and bombing of children and shooting of innocents. Instead of being like a stupid ten year old why don’t explain why it is alright and why the treatment of the Palestinians doesn’t equate with what the Nazis did?

      741. You clearly have a view. Somehow you seem able to justify the starving and bombing of children and shooting of innocents. Instead of being like a stupid ten year old why don’t explain why it is alright and why the treatment of the Palestinians doesn’t equate with what the Nazis did?

      743. Orthodox Judaism just as meshugah over the mitzva of Moshiach as the Av tuma avoda zara Xtian church.

        _MASHIACH: The Night Watchman

        ArtScroll Staff·The Official ArtScroll Blog·Aug 11, 2025

        Adapted from: Yearning for Redemption by Rabbi Daniel Glatstein

        The following verse (Tehillim 130:6) requires explanation: נַפְשִׁי לַה’ מִשֹּׁמְרִים לַבֹּקֶר שֹׁמְרִים לַבֹּקֶר.,
        _____________________
        ______________________
        Mitzva of Moshiach requires making הבדלה just as does shabbat observance separates מלאכה מן עבודה. Both this and that, Av tohor time-oriented Torah commandments! This Av type of commandment requires k’vanna. תולדות secondary – positive and negative and halachot mitzvot – do not require k’vanna. This represents a chiddush, a huge מאי נפקא מינא. T’NaCH\Talmud common law requires precedents. Rabbi Yishmael’s 13 middot refers to precedents as בניני אבות. To ascertain the k’vanna of tohor time-oriented commandments requires the wisdom how to correctly interpret prophetic mussar from the T’NaCH\Aggadah & Midrashim. The latter, specifically the T’NaCH Primary Sources, they determine the k’vanna of all Torah time-oriented commandments. Just that simple. No fancy dance’n. Prophets function as the police-enforcement teeth of the Great and Small Sanhedrin common law courts, within the borders of the oath sworn Cohen lands. Sworn by an oath brit between HaShem and the Avot as the eternal inheritance of the chosen Cohen People.

        The Yom Tov of ר”ה, יום הזכרון specifically remembers the t’shuva consequent to the Golden Calf. HaShem annulled His vow to make from Moshe’s עולם הבא children the chosen Cohen people! Moshe caused HaShem to remember the oaths sworn to Avraham, Yitzak and Yaacov. Hence the k’vanna of ברכת כהנים, and also likewise the k’vanna of קריא שמע תפילה דאורייתא. The last word אחד, does not refer to monotheism. Monotheism profanes the 2nd Sinai commandment. The 10 plagues judged the Gods of Egypt. Therefore, the word אחד the Yidden remember the oaths sworn by the Avot themselves wherein they cut a brit alliance to create from nothing (תמיד מעשה בראשית) the chosen Cohen people through Av tohor time-oriented commandments like shabbat & Moshiach. All generations merit to sanctify tohor time-oriented commandments. The idea that Jews wait for the coming of the Moshiach – this narishkeit defines Xtianity!

      744. You bloated dead Holocaust Denier pig, the EU News looks bleak for you. The EU perhaps stands on the same hangman’s spring door platform as Syria’s dictator Assad!

      745. Lebanon News: The Radical Change in the Balance of Power in the Middle East consequent to the Oct7th Abomination War.

        Lebanon has begun disarming non-state armed groups, specifically starting with Palestinian factions in camps such as Burj al-Barajneh, as part of a broader push to ensure weapons are held only by six official state security agencies. Additionally, Lebanon’s cabinet has approved the objectives of a U.S.-backed plan to disarm Hezbollah by the end of 2025, tasking the army to oversee this transition.

        In response, Hezbollah has outright rejected the plan, with its deputy leader Naim Kassem denouncing it as serving Israeli interests and warning against its implementation. Lebanon’s president has strongly rebuffed Iranian interference, emphasizing national sovereignty and rejecting foreign meddling—remarks delivered during a meeting with a senior Iranian official. Reports also indicate that Iran appears anxious about the implications of Hezbollah’s potential disarmament, viewing it as a major strategic setback to its regional influence.

        UNIFIL continues to operate across southern Lebanon, with its current mandate extended through August 31, 2025. The Security Council is debating a new resolution that not only aims to extend the mission, but also signals an eventual withdrawal of UNIFIL—contingent on the Lebanese government achieving full control over its territory and so long as a comprehensive political solution is in place.

        UNIFIL has experienced dangerous incidents in recent years: Israeli tanks forcibly entering UN positions, multiple attacks on watchtowers, and injuring or endangering peacekeepers. Locally, some communities have pushed back against UNIFIL patrols, especially when they occur without Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF) accompaniment, fueling tensions.

        A tragic incident on August 9, 2025, killed six Lebanese soldiers during munitions dismantling at a Hezbollah-linked depot, underscoring the persistent danger in the area. Its future beyond August hinges on Security Council deliberations and Lebanon’s ability to assume full security responsibilities.

        Despite a legislative ban by Israel that came into effect on January 30, 2025, targeting UNRWA’s operations in Israeli territory including East Jerusalem, UNRWA continues to provide essential aid in Gaza, the West Bank, and among refugee camps across the region. The agency has lost access to its Jerusalem headquarters, and many of its international staff have been forced to leave; yet, local staff remain on the ground delivering services under increasingly hostile conditions.

        Israel’s ban and accusations of UNRWA’s alleged ties to Hamas (including dismissals of some staff) have had far-reaching effects—diplomatic, legal, and operational. The agency remains under scrutiny, including court cases in the U.S. Still delivering critical services across Gaza and the West Bank, despite bans and evacuation of international staff.

      748. Must be alright then. Let’s starve them some more. Genocide as a weapon. War crimes are tactics! Great!

      749. It certainly alright during WWI and WWII during Korea, Vietnam, the two invasions of Iraq, Afghanistan etc etc etc.

      764. No. Knowledgeable and intelligent. Look at the quality of responses. ‘Pig all you do is oink oink oink’ hardly erudite. More moronic.

      768. Yo shit 4 brains, here’s a clip by an Irish man who actually visited Israel after Oct 7th. YOU dumb ass YOU cannot address the issues raised by this Irish Man!!!!! Fuck YOU

      769. Until both sides stop indoctrinating kids; until they all stop hating; until everyone realises that violence breeds more violence you will have war.

      785. The utter and total bankruptcy of European church theology has made this dead religion stink like a rotting corps in the Mid Summer day’s oppressive heat.

        Barth argued that God reveals Himself primarily through Jesus Christ and the Scriptures. He emphasized that human understanding of God must come from divine revelation rather than human reason or experience. The horrors of the Nazi Shoah revealed that Goyim worship air and no God. Jesus and his Father in Heaven – as dead as a door nail.

        Barth’s obtuse theology distinguished between the “Word of God” (Jesus Christ) and the “words of men” (human interpretations). He believed that true theology must focus on the former, asserting that any human attempt to understand God must be grounded in the revelation of Christ. What utter pie in the sky religious rhetoric nonsense. The bible sophomoric translations of the Hebrew T’NaCH — all written by men. Most of whom had absolutely no or very little knowledge of Hebrew and Aramaic – the original language of the Hebrew T’NaCH.

        None of the sophomoric bible Xtian translators new the difference between T’NaCH and Talmudic common law from Roman statute law. None of these absolute ignoramuses understood the difference between Rabbi Akiva’s kabbalah of פרדס inductive reasoning from Aristotle’s deductive syllogism reasoning! The two divergent logic formats day and night different. Yet uneducated Xtian translators of their so called “Word of God” bibles as ignorant as bees on the rump of a braying ass.

        Barth often contrasted the Pauline utter religious rhetoric theological nonsense of “Human sinfulness (Original Sin of Adam) with God’s grace. Never does his empty religious rhetoric ever question how grace as a Godly attribute revealed to Moshe at Horev distinguishes itself from Mercy or Great Chessed or Truth ect other attributes revealed to Moshe at Horev 40 days after the Sin of the Golden Calf.

        Barth’s theology of a Universal God argues that this God owns absolute sovereignty, wholly transcendent. Which completely ignores the Jewish Tribal God revealed only to Israel at Sinai, which the Xtian and Muslim religions utterly rejected that revelation, which understands HaShem as a local tribal God of the Hebrew Chosen Cohen people alone. Outside of Judea/Israel HaShem as a local tribal God has absolutely no sovereignty transcendent rule.

        Hence outside of the oath sworn lands no one can worship HaShem לשמה; this represents the Torah curse imposed upon g’lut/exiled Jews. And Goyim who never accepted the revelation of the Torah at Sinai – how much more so! Central to Barth’s theology is the belief that all theological reflection must be centered on Christ. This narishkeit exposes Av tumah avoda zarah; Torah defines faith as the righteous pursuit of judicial justice wherein the Sanhedrin common law courts strive to make fair compensation of damages inflicted by Party A upon Party B.

        Av tumah avoda zarah promote theological creed rhetoric which dictates what believers must believe in this or that or some other God. Bonhoeffer’s political stance against the Nazis is admirable — he resisted a church that bent its knee to Hitler. But the substance of his theology remained trapped within the very Christian framework of Barth’s bankrupt and void theology. Barth and Bonhoeffer both anchor “truth” in Christology, a theological rhetoric divorced from judicial justice or covenantal precedent. Both preserve Pauline substitution theology (sin/grace, Christ as “Word of God”), which replaces Torah’s oath alliance revelation with mythic universality.

        Neither ever engaged in Torah common law precedent vs. Roman statute law — nor did they recognize the practical, courtroom-based definition of faith as צדק צדק תרדוף. Bonhoeffer opposed Nazism, but he did so with bankrupt theological tools. His “religionless Christianity” or “cost of discipleship” never escaped Barth’s fundamental error: mistaking a theological creed for covenantal justice. Even resistance to Nazi tyranny in German Protestant circles still operated inside the false logic of avoda zarah. They never questioned the Pauline framework that itself fed centuries of Jew-hatred, pogroms, blood libels, and ultimately the Shoah.

      791. The Opening sugya of mesechta קידושין

        “Can’t see the forest for the trees” – being so focused on small details that you lose sight of the bigger picture. The trees – all the halachot raised in each and every sugya of Gemara. The forest, the common law basis wherein the Talmud serves as the model to re-establish common law courts of Sanhedrin Legislative Review of all government statute laws. This summates my criticism of the statute law codes; how they utterly corrupted how Yeshiva education became all corrupted and Fubar.  The more polite definition of the latter Army military euphemism –  “Fouled Up Beyond All Recognition”. But when a jarhead employs the term, he means: “fucked up beyond all repair”.

        The assimilated statute halachic codes, focus upon making a D’sok Halacha. In the case of the Rambam Fubar – straight from the Talmud itself. In the Case of the far weaker – copy-cat – halachic statute codifications of the Tur and Shulkan Aruch – they organized a codification of Reshonim opinion upon any given halacha from the Talmud. Why does assimilated statute halacha pervert the Talmud and Reshonim commentaries upon the Talmud into a fubar? Several reasons: 1. They rely upon the syllogism deductive logic developed by Aristotle and Plato. This substitute theology of logic, it replaces the kabbalah of rabbi Akiva’s revolutionary interpretation of the revelation of the Oral Torah at Horev unto פרדס. No different, what so ever, from the ערב רב שיצאו ממצרים. The latter Jews the Torah during the reading prior to Purim which remembers the tohor middah of רחום. Specifically, the commandment to war against Amalek in all generations. רחום — עמלק, represents a כלל — פרט in how the corollary 13 middot of rabbi Yishmael amplify the פרדס kabbalah of rabbi Akiva’s understanding of how the Oral Torah revelation interpret the kvanna of the Written Torah.

        The Torah description of Jews as אין להם יראת אלהים – the first inference to “Fear of Heaven” in the Book of שמות. The later prophets mussar refers to assimilated Israel as אנשי סדום. They too lacked “fear of heaven” as the Book of בראשית introduces. בעל שם טוב: This term פרט, refers to the founder of Hasidic Judaism, Rabbi Israel Baal Shem Tov.  However this term כלל, refers to the pursuit of a righteous Good Name reputation. Post Shoah Xtianity permanently lost the claim to a moral good name reputation. Hence: יראת שמים the Talmud directly applies to both a Torah sofer and a shochet. 

        The mitzva of kashrut, spins around public trust based upon יראת שמים.The rediscovery of the concealed Ancient Greek texts which caused the Hanukkah Civil War which pitted the P’rushim against the Tzeddukim; when Muslim Armies invaded Spain in approximately 900, during the lifetime of Saadia ben Joseph, 882–942 CE. These rediscovered ancient Greek writings caused the Jews of Spain to emphatically embrace Greek deductive logic. This triggered the “Golden Age” of Spanish Reshonim T’NaCH and Talmudic scholarship!!! Alas the bards (Robert Plant (lyrics) and Jimmy Page (music) who wrote the song  “Stairway to Heaven”, declared: sometimes words have two meanings.)  טיפש פשט by stark contrast gets all hyper in their diaper over the obvious ‘bird brained’ ‘brain-washed’ meaning. 

        How the Orthodox make a simplistic understanding of the בראשית Creation story, functions as a פרט example.  Another פרט example:  Yeshiva bukkarim saying (all the time) מה פשט?
        The false ideal to simplify or stupify abstract T’NaCH and Talmudic common law, simply brain dead.  The Siddur serves as the foundation of all Talmudic scholarship.  Just that simple.  No fancy dance’n.  The Siddur stands upon the יסוד of ORDER.  The ORDER of פרדס inductive logic, not the same as the ORDER of Aristotle’s syllogism – deductive logic.  The assimilated statute law halachic codes – they shatter the ORDER of T’NaCH and Talmudic common law.

        A three-part syllogism is a form of logical reasoning that consists of three statements: two premises and a conclusion. It is a classic structure used in deductive reasoning, often associated with the philosopher Aristotle. Hegel’s bi-polar dialectics and Aristotle’s syllogism represent two distinct approaches to logic and reasoning, each with its own philosophical underpinnings and implications.  Hegel’s dialectics is a process of development through contradictions. It involves a triadic structure often summarized as thesis, antithesis, and synthesis. The thesis represents an initial idea or state, the antithesis is its contradiction or negation, and the synthesis resolves the conflict between the two, leading to a higher understanding or state.  

        Hegel’s approach emphasizes change and development. Ideas evolve through conflict and resolution, reflecting the complexity of reality. This process is not linear but rather cyclical, where each synthesis can become a new thesis, leading to further contradictions and resolutions.  This late 19th Century German philosophy served as the logic foundation of Marx’s theory of Communism as a response to the Industrial Revolution.  “Revolution” implies the over-throw of the ‘Old Order’.  What defines the “Old Order” of the Middle Ages?  The economies of the Middle Ages made wealth through the Order of village communes, known as feudalism, wherein the aristocratic lords produced wealth through agricultural production.  The Industrial Revolution over-threw that ‘Old Order’, and replaced it by the production of wealth through Industrial production of goods and services.  This cause a mass population transfer from peasant living in village communes tied to working for their lords.  To citizens with political rights who lived and worked within the factories within huge cities.

        To understand the difference between rabbi Akiva’s פרדס inductive logic from Aristotle’s deductive logic, fundamentally requires comparing the two viewed from a fair larger “BIG PICTURE” context.  The two-dimensional halachic statute law codes, they compare to looking at a camera picture rather than actually seeing the event captured by the picture.  The question מה פשט?  Simply ideal for the two-dimensional deductive reasoning of Greek deductive logic.  The mitzva of lighting the lights of Hanukkah – the dedication to interpret the Written Torah through, and only through, the inductive logic of פרדס; the latter defines the culture and customs practiced by the chosen Cohen seed of the Avot throughout all generations.  The passage of this Cohonim culture and customs from generation, to generation, to generation – defines the k’vanna of תחיית המתים.  As does similar, marriage with the purpose to produce children and educate them to keep the cultures and customs of the chosen Cohen people.  The mitzva of קידושין.

        Rabbi Akiva’s inductive logic system directly compares to a Loom.  A Loom essential in the construction of the Mishkan.  As a Loom as its warp & weft opposing threads, the “fabric” of the T’NaCH and Talmud contains the Aggada threads of prophetic mussar contrasted by the Halachic threads of practical halachic ritualism.  Weaving the two opposing strands creates time oriented commandments which require k’vanna.  The Rambam, Tur, and Shulkan Aruch deductive logic divorces halacha from aggada.  Worse, the Prime assimilated Reshon Spanish רשע, his code uprooted halacha from its Home Mishna.  The commentaries on the Rambam Code, in their assimilated darkness, failed to affix any Rambam halacha to the B’hag, Rif, or Rosh common law codes. 

        The latter understood that the Gemarah halachot serve as the “70 faces to the Torah”, they view the language of the Home Mishna from different perspectives to make depth re-interpretations of the obvious פשט language of the Home Mishna!  This criticism, equally applies to Rabbeinu Tam the leader of the Baali Tosafot common law commentary upon the Talmud.  Going off the dof in search of a legal precedent permits the scholar to view his sugya of Gemara based upon a radically different perspective – “70 faces to the Torah”.  However, the Baali Tosafot commentaries, approximately 60 common law scholars, failed to make the required משנה תורה and make a “Legislative Review” of the language of the Home Mishna which the Gemara comments by way of comparing precedent cases!

        Rashi’s common law commentary to the Chumash – radically differs from Rashi’s dictionary like פשט commentary to the Talmud.  For this reason Rabbeinu Tam challenged the Rashi commentary made upon the Talmud.  The question stands:  Why did Rashi change from his common law פשט based upon T’NaCH and Talmudic Bavli and Yerushalmi precedent to writing a dictionary of terms to explain the language of the Talmud?  Answer:  Rashi witnessed the 1st Crusades and the slaughter of the Jews in Germany.  Rabbeinu Tam died before the Rambam published his statute law abomination in approximately 1185.  The Baali Tosafot placed the Rambam into נידוי in Paris 1232.  A decade later, the Pope and King of France burned all the Talmudic manuscripts in Paris.  King Philip IV of France (also known as Philip the Fair) expelled all Jews from France in 1306. This uprooted and destroyed the Rashi/Tosafot common law school of T’NaCH and Talmudic scholarship. Whereas the P’rushim defeated the assimilated Tzeddukiim, which the lights of Hanukkah remember; the Rambam forced Rabbeinu Yonah to write Shari Tshuva. Rashi feared the Goyim might learn how to study the Talmud as common law. Therefore he concealed this basic kabbalah limited only to his commentary to the Chumash. He did not even extend it to his commentaries upon the NaCH or Midrash!

        The Jews in ארץ ישראל possessed the wisdom, how to obey Torah mitzvot לשמה.  The Jews in living under the Torah Av tumah curse of g’lut, did not possess the wisdom, how to obey Torah mitzvot לשמה.  A simple מאי נפקא מינא, just that simple.  No fancy dance’n.  (Hence I refuse to travel to g’lut lands because I know I would immediately eat treif foods pork and shrimp yum yum.)The כלל to anything in life, but most especially to T’NaCH and Talmudic scholarship לשמה – ORDER.  The Siddur functions as the יסוד upon which both the T’NaCH prophetic mussar and Talmudic halachah stand.  Just that simple.  No fancy dance’n.  Therefore, sugya integrity defines how to study and learn both T’NaCH and Talmud.  This discipline of scholarship known, as taught to me by Rav Nemuraskii, as learning through a sh’itta.

        The internal ORDER of each and every sugya of Gemara – throughout the Sha’s Bavli and Yerushalmi.  Post Shoah, Xtianity and Islam have destroyed their Good Name reputations.  Jews have reconquered our homeland.  Goyim rot as stinking Palestinian dhimmi refugees and Xtians wait for the 2nd coming of their Gods.  What struck fear in Rashi and Rabbeinu Tam, no longer exists.  The shoe worn on the other foot today. Can our generations achieve self-determination in our Homeland and make the Torah the Constitution of our Republic of 12 Tribes?  Can we build the lateral Sanhedrin Federal Court System of common law Legislative Review?  These two fundamental questions shape and define Jewish identity today.  The purpose of T’NaCH and Talmudic scholarship today does not resemble the Reshonim need to codify a Jewish religion for Jewish communities scattered across g’lut having little or no communication between communities.  Today we can communicate in seconds what Jews then took perhaps generations!  The reality of the times determines the Halacha.  This issue which confronts our generations today, can we bring a re-birth to the chosen people, the Cohen sons and daughters of the Avot? 
        ________________________________________
        ________________________________________

        This Mesechta of Gemara includes the commentary of the Ran רבינו נסים.  He merits respect perhaps on par with the B’HaG, Rif, Rosh, and Tosafot.  If Spain produced a ‘Golden Age’, perhaps he best defines it.  The Ran emphasized the importance of the oral tradition and the interpretations of earlier authorities, including the Baali Tosafot.  The Ran did not support the cherem (excommunication) issued by the Baali Tosafot against the Rambam’s works, but he did align with the concerns raised by the Rosh (Rabbi Asher ben Jehiel) and others regarding the potential implications of the Rambam’s rationalist approach. The Rosh was particularly critical of the Rambam’s philosophical ideas and their impact on Jewish faith.

        Rabbi Asher ben Jehiel, the Rosh, openly critical of the Rambam and supported the cherem against his works, viewing them as a threat to traditional Jewish beliefs. He believed that the Rambam’s rationalism could lead to heretical ideas.  The Ran, while critical of certain elements of the Rambam’s philosophy, maintained a more nuanced position, recognizing the value of the Rambam’s legal contributions while also advocating for adherence to traditional interpretations and the authority of earlier scholars.

        The distinction between Jewish common law (halacha) and Roman statute law is an important aspect of legal theory, particularly in the context of medieval Jewish scholarship.  Jewish Common Law (Halacha): This refers to the body of Jewish law derived from the Torah, Talmud, and later rabbinic interpretations. It is often characterized by its case-based nature, where legal principles are derived from specific cases and precedents.  Roman Statute Law: This refers to the codified laws of the Roman legal system, which organized legal principles into systematic categories. Roman law had a more formalized structure, with clear definitions and classifications.

        The Rosh emphasized the importance of maintaining the integrity of Jewish law as distinct from external legal systems, such as Roman law. He was critical of the Rambam’s codification efforts, particularly in the Mishneh Torah, which he felt could blur the lines between Jewish common law and alien legal traditions developed by both the Greek and Roman civilizations.

        The Ran, while respecting the Rambam’s contributions, did not emphasize the same differentiation between Jewish common law and Roman statute law. His approach was more focused on the practical application of halacha and the integration of various legal sources, including the Rambam’s codification.

        The differing approaches of the Ran and the Rosh reflect broader debates within Jewish legal thought about the nature of halacha, the influence of external legal systems, and the importance of maintaining a distinct Jewish legal identity. The Rosh’s emphasis on the uniqueness of Jewish law contrasts with the Ran’s more integrative approach, highlighting the complexities of legal scholarship in medieval Judaism.

        Rabbi Moses ben Jacob of Coucy, the Baali Mor, wrote a commentary critical of the Rif common law commentary written upon the Talmud. He learn the Gemara as precedent halachot by which a person could re-interpret the original language of the Mishna. Hence he learned by reliance upon other Primary Source precedents to understand the language of the Talmud viewed from multiple perspectives. Like the Front/Top\Side views of a blue-print. His chief criticism on the Rif, that his code diminished the depth fluidity of inductive logic reasoning which compares Case/Law to similar precedent Case/Law. The Baali Mor emphasized the importance of studying the Gemara as a source of halachic precedent. He believed that the Gemara should be used to reinterpret the original language of the Mishnah, allowing for a deeper understanding of the legal principles involved.  A Baali Mor’s chief criticism(s) of the Rif – that his codification diminished the depth and fluidity of inductive reasoning in halachic analysis. The Rif’s structured approach, caused scholars to read his p’sok halacha in a simplified טיפש פשט sh’itta, which confused the inductive vs. deductive reasoning dispute which the Rambam later exploded into a bitter Jewish Civil War. 

        Court room common law makes ‘compare and contrast’ essential for inductive reasoning.  Essential for deriving legal principles from specific precedent Case instances.  The Baali Mor advocated for a more dynamic interpretation of halacha, where the law is not seen as static but rather as adaptable to different circumstances.  Talmud in his opinion serves as the model for later common law court room jurisprudence.  This perspective encourages ongoing interpretation and application of halachic principles based on the complexities of real-life situations.  His critique of the Rif highlights the ongoing dialogue within Jewish scholarship about what right then required prioritization. 

        Religious halachic codifications vs. the fluidity of legal reasoning which differentiate the brief precedents brought by the prosecution vs. the defense.  In practical terms he differentiates and prioritizes Judicial common law courts from religious codifications.  The latter permits the common man in scattered g’lut communities to easily determine and shape religious halachic faith.  The RambaN wrote מלחמת השם because he recognized the dire needs of g’lut Jews scattered abroad to have access to clear codes of Jewish ritual religious law.

        Sugya integrity defines the substance of all Talmudic common law scholarship.  The Rambam Code destroyed this יסוד, like as does Dof Yomi today.  Sugya integrity has an opening and closing thesis statement.  All points of halacha raised in the body of the sugya must fit somewhere on the sh’itta “line” which connects the dots between the opening thesis statement and the closing restatement of the same thesis statement … משנה תורה.  The opening sugya starts on dof .ב and concludes at dof :ג.  The language of the Mishna which requires a משנה תורה re-interpretation of the original language: האשה נקנית בג’ דרכים וקונה את עצמה בב’ דרכים.The opening thesis statement: האשה נקנית.  מאי שנא הכא דתני האשה נקנית ו ומה שכתב התם דתני האיש מקדש משום דקא בעי למיתני דתני ה כסף. Compare this to the closing משנה תורה restatement of the Opening thesis statement: מה יבמה שאינה יוצאת בגט יוציא בחליצה קמ”ל. ואימא ה”נ אמר קרא ספר כריתות. ספר כירתה, ואין דבר אחר כורתה Now the question stands: How does the closing thesis statement amplify the opening this statement?

        The phrase “A woman is acquired” refers to the legal framework of marriage in Jewish law (halacha). However, it is crucial to understand that this term does not imply that a woman is treated as a commodity or object like a slave or a prostitute. Instead, it reflects the formal legal process of marriage, which involves mutual consent and specific actions.  A Jewish woman is not comparable to a slave or a whore because her acquisition in marriage is based on mutual respect, commitment, and legal obligations. The concept of acquisition in marriage (kiddushin) is fundamentally different from the transactional nature of slavery or prostitution.

        Hence the closing thesis statement makes a מאי נפקא מינא separation/distinction between קידושין and חליצה.  These two points establish the sh’itta line of all the rest of the subject matter raised in the body of this the opening Mishna of קידושין.  

      796. I do not deny the holocaust and I agree that Israel has the right to exist. Are you nuts? Can’t you read?

      797. Bull shit. Liar SOB. You declared a few post past that the Palestinians refugees who have no nation of their own have greater rights to the lands of Israel than to Jews. You scum Holocaust Denier Pig.

      805. So you liken yourself to the Evil Queen in the fairy tale “Snow White.” What flattery. Vile criminal Holocaust Denier scum.

      809. Accusation of genocide against Israel: This is a rhetorical weapon, not a serious legal or historical argument. The UN Genocide Convention defines genocide narrowly (intent to destroy a group in whole or part), and nothing in Israel’s Gaza war remotely fits the Shoah’s systematic annihilation program.

        Equating Gaza with the Shoah: This creates a false equivalence. It trivializes the Holocaust by comparing it to a conventional (albeit tragic and brutal) military conflict. That’s a classic form of Holocaust distortion, which scholars recognize as a component of Holocaust denial.

        Exposing the distortion: equating Shoah ↔ Gaza is not just “bad taste” but an active rewriting of history. Naming the antisemitism: Holocaust denial is a recognized form of antisemitism (see IHRA working definition). Turning the charge: Instead of defending Israel on impossible moral terrain (as if Jews must prove innocence of genocide), have unmasked the pig’s denial of Jewish historical trauma.

        Holocaust Denier as an accusation: It’s not exactly a counter-argument about Gaza itself (so in that sense it’s not a direct rebuttal). Have exposed the vast under-belly of this Opher pig. Made a valid exposure of the rhetorical abuse—that this pig antisemite, trafficks in Holocaust denial by trivialization.

      810. The Opening sugya of mesechta קידושין

        “Can’t see the forest for the trees” – being so focused on small details that you lose sight of the bigger picture. The trees – all the halachot raised in each and every sugya of Gemara. The forest, the common law basis wherein the Talmud serves as the model to re-establish common law courts of Sanhedrin Legislative Review of all government statute laws. This summates my criticism of the statute law codes; how they utterly corrupted how Yeshiva education became all corrupted and Fubar.  The more polite definition of the latter Army military euphemism –  “Fouled Up Beyond All Recognition”. But when a jarhead employs the term, he means: “fucked up beyond all repair”.

        The assimilated statute halachic codes, focus upon making a D’sok Halacha. In the case of the Rambam Fubar – straight from the Talmud itself. In the Case of the far weaker – copy-cat – halachic statute codifications of the Tur and Shulkan Aruch – they organized a codification of Reshonim opinion upon any given halacha from the Talmud. Why does assimilated statute halacha pervert the Talmud and Reshonim commentaries upon the Talmud into a fubar? Several reasons: 1. They rely upon the syllogism deductive logic developed by Aristotle and Plato. This substitute theology of logic, it replaces the kabbalah of rabbi Akiva’s revolutionary interpretation of the revelation of the Oral Torah at Horev unto פרדס. No different, what so ever, from the ערב רב שיצאו ממצרים. The latter Jews the Torah during the reading prior to Purim which remembers the tohor middah of רחום. Specifically, the commandment to war against Amalek in all generations. רחום — עמלק, represents a כלל — פרט in how the corollary 13 middot of rabbi Yishmael amplify the פרדס kabbalah of rabbi Akiva’s understanding of how the Oral Torah revelation interpret the kvanna of the Written Torah.

        The Torah description of Jews as אין להם יראת אלהים – the first inference to “Fear of Heaven” in the Book of שמות. The later prophets mussar refers to assimilated Israel as אנשי סדום. They too lacked “fear of heaven” as the Book of בראשית introduces. בעל שם טוב: This term פרט, refers to the founder of Hasidic Judaism, Rabbi Israel Baal Shem Tov.  However this term כלל, refers to the pursuit of a righteous Good Name reputation. Post Shoah Xtianity permanently lost the claim to a moral good name reputation. Hence: יראת שמים the Talmud directly applies to both a Torah sofer and a shochet. 

        The mitzva of kashrut, spins around public trust based upon יראת שמים.The rediscovery of the concealed Ancient Greek texts which caused the Hanukkah Civil War which pitted the P’rushim against the Tzeddukim; when Muslim Armies invaded Spain in approximately 900, during the lifetime of Saadia ben Joseph, 882–942 CE. These rediscovered ancient Greek writings caused the Jews of Spain to emphatically embrace Greek deductive logic. This triggered the “Golden Age” of Spanish Reshonim T’NaCH and Talmudic scholarship!!! Alas the bards (Robert Plant (lyrics) and Jimmy Page (music) who wrote the song  “Stairway to Heaven”, declared: sometimes words have two meanings.)  טיפש פשט by stark contrast gets all hyper in their diaper over the obvious ‘bird brained’ ‘brain-washed’ meaning. 

        How the Orthodox make a simplistic understanding of the בראשית Creation story, functions as a פרט example.  Another פרט example:  Yeshiva bukkarim saying (all the time) מה פשט?
        The false ideal to simplify or stupify abstract T’NaCH and Talmudic common law, simply brain dead.  The Siddur serves as the foundation of all Talmudic scholarship.  Just that simple.  No fancy dance’n.  The Siddur stands upon the יסוד of ORDER.  The ORDER of פרדס inductive logic, not the same as the ORDER of Aristotle’s syllogism – deductive logic.  The assimilated statute law halachic codes – they shatter the ORDER of T’NaCH and Talmudic common law.

        A three-part syllogism is a form of logical reasoning that consists of three statements: two premises and a conclusion. It is a classic structure used in deductive reasoning, often associated with the philosopher Aristotle. Hegel’s bi-polar dialectics and Aristotle’s syllogism represent two distinct approaches to logic and reasoning, each with its own philosophical underpinnings and implications.  Hegel’s dialectics is a process of development through contradictions. It involves a triadic structure often summarized as thesis, antithesis, and synthesis. The thesis represents an initial idea or state, the antithesis is its contradiction or negation, and the synthesis resolves the conflict between the two, leading to a higher understanding or state.  

        Hegel’s approach emphasizes change and development. Ideas evolve through conflict and resolution, reflecting the complexity of reality. This process is not linear but rather cyclical, where each synthesis can become a new thesis, leading to further contradictions and resolutions.  This late 19th Century German philosophy served as the logic foundation of Marx’s theory of Communism as a response to the Industrial Revolution.  “Revolution” implies the over-throw of the ‘Old Order’.  What defines the “Old Order” of the Middle Ages?  The economies of the Middle Ages made wealth through the Order of village communes, known as feudalism, wherein the aristocratic lords produced wealth through agricultural production.  The Industrial Revolution over-threw that ‘Old Order’, and replaced it by the production of wealth through Industrial production of goods and services.  This cause a mass population transfer from peasant living in village communes tied to working for their lords.  To citizens with political rights who lived and worked within the factories within huge cities.

        To understand the difference between rabbi Akiva’s פרדס inductive logic from Aristotle’s deductive logic, fundamentally requires comparing the two viewed from a fair larger “BIG PICTURE” context.  The two-dimensional halachic statute law codes, they compare to looking at a camera picture rather than actually seeing the event captured by the picture.  The question מה פשט?  Simply ideal for the two-dimensional deductive reasoning of Greek deductive logic.  The mitzva of lighting the lights of Hanukkah – the dedication to interpret the Written Torah through, and only through, the inductive logic of פרדס; the latter defines the culture and customs practiced by the chosen Cohen seed of the Avot throughout all generations.  The passage of this Cohonim culture and customs from generation, to generation, to generation – defines the k’vanna of תחיית המתים.  As does similar, marriage with the purpose to produce children and educate them to keep the cultures and customs of the chosen Cohen people.  The mitzva of קידושין.

        Rabbi Akiva’s inductive logic system directly compares to a Loom.  A Loom essential in the construction of the Mishkan.  As a Loom as its warp & weft opposing threads, the “fabric” of the T’NaCH and Talmud contains the Aggada threads of prophetic mussar contrasted by the Halachic threads of practical halachic ritualism.  Weaving the two opposing strands creates time oriented commandments which require k’vanna.  The Rambam, Tur, and Shulkan Aruch deductive logic divorces halacha from aggada.  Worse, the Prime assimilated Reshon Spanish רשע, his code uprooted halacha from its Home Mishna.  The commentaries on the Rambam Code, in their assimilated darkness, failed to affix any Rambam halacha to the B’hag, Rif, or Rosh common law codes. 

        The latter understood that the Gemarah halachot serve as the “70 faces to the Torah”, they view the language of the Home Mishna from different perspectives to make depth re-interpretations of the obvious פשט language of the Home Mishna!  This criticism, equally applies to Rabbeinu Tam the leader of the Baali Tosafot common law commentary upon the Talmud.  Going off the dof in search of a legal precedent permits the scholar to view his sugya of Gemara based upon a radically different perspective – “70 faces to the Torah”.  However, the Baali Tosafot commentaries, approximately 60 common law scholars, failed to make the required משנה תורה and make a “Legislative Review” of the language of the Home Mishna which the Gemara comments by way of comparing precedent cases!

        Rashi’s common law commentary to the Chumash – radically differs from Rashi’s dictionary like פשט commentary to the Talmud.  For this reason Rabbeinu Tam challenged the Rashi commentary made upon the Talmud.  The question stands:  Why did Rashi change from his common law פשט based upon T’NaCH and Talmudic Bavli and Yerushalmi precedent to writing a dictionary of terms to explain the language of the Talmud?  Answer:  Rashi witnessed the 1st Crusades and the slaughter of the Jews in Germany.  Rabbeinu Tam died before the Rambam published his statute law abomination in approximately 1185.  The Baali Tosafot placed the Rambam into נידוי in Paris 1232.  A decade later, the Pope and King of France burned all the Talmudic manuscripts in Paris.  King Philip IV of France (also known as Philip the Fair) expelled all Jews from France in 1306. This uprooted and destroyed the Rashi/Tosafot common law school of T’NaCH and Talmudic scholarship. Whereas the P’rushim defeated the assimilated Tzeddukiim, which the lights of Hanukkah remember; the Rambam forced Rabbeinu Yonah to write Shari Tshuva. Rashi feared the Goyim might learn how to study the Talmud as common law. Therefore he concealed this basic kabbalah limited only to his commentary to the Chumash. He did not even extend it to his commentaries upon the NaCH or Midrash!

        The Jews in ארץ ישראל possessed the wisdom, how to obey Torah mitzvot לשמה.  The Jews in living under the Torah Av tumah curse of g’lut, did not possess the wisdom, how to obey Torah mitzvot לשמה.  A simple מאי נפקא מינא, just that simple.  No fancy dance’n.  (Hence I refuse to travel to g’lut lands because I know I would immediately eat treif foods pork and shrimp yum yum.)The כלל to anything in life, but most especially to T’NaCH and Talmudic scholarship לשמה – ORDER.  The Siddur functions as the יסוד upon which both the T’NaCH prophetic mussar and Talmudic halachah stand.  Just that simple.  No fancy dance’n.  Therefore, sugya integrity defines how to study and learn both T’NaCH and Talmud.  This discipline of scholarship known, as taught to me by Rav Nemuraskii, as learning through a sh’itta.

        The internal ORDER of each and every sugya of Gemara – throughout the Sha’s Bavli and Yerushalmi.  Post Shoah, Xtianity and Islam have destroyed their Good Name reputations.  Jews have reconquered our homeland.  Goyim rot as stinking Palestinian dhimmi refugees and Xtians wait for the 2nd coming of their Gods.  What struck fear in Rashi and Rabbeinu Tam, no longer exists.  The shoe worn on the other foot today. Can our generations achieve self-determination in our Homeland and make the Torah the Constitution of our Republic of 12 Tribes?  Can we build the lateral Sanhedrin Federal Court System of common law Legislative Review?  These two fundamental questions shape and define Jewish identity today.  The purpose of T’NaCH and Talmudic scholarship today does not resemble the Reshonim need to codify a Jewish religion for Jewish communities scattered across g’lut having little or no communication between communities.  Today we can communicate in seconds what Jews then took perhaps generations!  The reality of the times determines the Halacha.  This issue which confronts our generations today, can we bring a re-birth to the chosen people, the Cohen sons and daughters of the Avot? 
        ________________________________________
        ________________________________________

        This Mesechta of Gemara includes the commentary of the Ran רבינו נסים.  He merits respect perhaps on par with the B’HaG, Rif, Rosh, and Tosafot.  If Spain produced a ‘Golden Age’, perhaps he best defines it.  The Ran emphasized the importance of the oral tradition and the interpretations of earlier authorities, including the Baali Tosafot.  The Ran did not support the cherem (excommunication) issued by the Baali Tosafot against the Rambam’s works, but he did align with the concerns raised by the Rosh (Rabbi Asher ben Jehiel) and others regarding the potential implications of the Rambam’s rationalist approach. The Rosh was particularly critical of the Rambam’s philosophical ideas and their impact on Jewish faith.

        Rabbi Asher ben Jehiel, the Rosh, openly critical of the Rambam and supported the cherem against his works, viewing them as a threat to traditional Jewish beliefs. He believed that the Rambam’s rationalism could lead to heretical ideas.  The Ran, while critical of certain elements of the Rambam’s philosophy, maintained a more nuanced position, recognizing the value of the Rambam’s legal contributions while also advocating for adherence to traditional interpretations and the authority of earlier scholars.

        The distinction between Jewish common law (halacha) and Roman statute law is an important aspect of legal theory, particularly in the context of medieval Jewish scholarship.  Jewish Common Law (Halacha): This refers to the body of Jewish law derived from the Torah, Talmud, and later rabbinic interpretations. It is often characterized by its case-based nature, where legal principles are derived from specific cases and precedents.  Roman Statute Law: This refers to the codified laws of the Roman legal system, which organized legal principles into systematic categories. Roman law had a more formalized structure, with clear definitions and classifications.

        The Rosh emphasized the importance of maintaining the integrity of Jewish law as distinct from external legal systems, such as Roman law. He was critical of the Rambam’s codification efforts, particularly in the Mishneh Torah, which he felt could blur the lines between Jewish common law and alien legal traditions developed by both the Greek and Roman civilizations.

        The Ran, while respecting the Rambam’s contributions, did not emphasize the same differentiation between Jewish common law and Roman statute law. His approach was more focused on the practical application of halacha and the integration of various legal sources, including the Rambam’s codification.

        The differing approaches of the Ran and the Rosh reflect broader debates within Jewish legal thought about the nature of halacha, the influence of external legal systems, and the importance of maintaining a distinct Jewish legal identity. The Rosh’s emphasis on the uniqueness of Jewish law contrasts with the Ran’s more integrative approach, highlighting the complexities of legal scholarship in medieval Judaism.

        Rabbi Moses ben Jacob of Coucy, the Baali Mor, wrote a commentary critical of the Rif common law commentary written upon the Talmud. He learn the Gemara as precedent halachot by which a person could re-interpret the original language of the Mishna. Hence he learned by reliance upon other Primary Source precedents to understand the language of the Talmud viewed from multiple perspectives. Like the Front/Top\Side views of a blue-print. His chief criticism on the Rif, that his code diminished the depth fluidity of inductive logic reasoning which compares Case/Law to similar precedent Case/Law. The Baali Mor emphasized the importance of studying the Gemara as a source of halachic precedent. He believed that the Gemara should be used to reinterpret the original language of the Mishnah, allowing for a deeper understanding of the legal principles involved.  A Baali Mor’s chief criticism(s) of the Rif – that his codification diminished the depth and fluidity of inductive reasoning in halachic analysis. The Rif’s structured approach, caused scholars to read his p’sok halacha in a simplified טיפש פשט sh’itta, which confused the inductive vs. deductive reasoning dispute which the Rambam later exploded into a bitter Jewish Civil War. 

        Court room common law makes ‘compare and contrast’ essential for inductive reasoning.  Essential for deriving legal principles from specific precedent Case instances.  The Baali Mor advocated for a more dynamic interpretation of halacha, where the law is not seen as static but rather as adaptable to different circumstances.  Talmud in his opinion serves as the model for later common law court room jurisprudence.  This perspective encourages ongoing interpretation and application of halachic principles based on the complexities of real-life situations.  His critique of the Rif highlights the ongoing dialogue within Jewish scholarship about what right then required prioritization. 

        Religious halachic codifications vs. the fluidity of legal reasoning which differentiate the brief precedents brought by the prosecution vs. the defense.  In practical terms he differentiates and prioritizes Judicial common law courts from religious codifications.  The latter permits the common man in scattered g’lut communities to easily determine and shape religious halachic faith.  The RambaN wrote מלחמת השם because he recognized the dire needs of g’lut Jews scattered abroad to have access to clear codes of Jewish ritual religious law.

        Sugya integrity defines the substance of all Talmudic common law scholarship.  The Rambam Code destroyed this יסוד, like as does Dof Yomi today.  Sugya integrity has an opening and closing thesis statement.  All points of halacha raised in the body of the sugya must fit somewhere on the sh’itta “line” which connects the dots between the opening thesis statement and the closing restatement of the same thesis statement … משנה תורה.  The opening sugya starts on dof .ב and concludes at dof :ג.  The language of the Mishna which requires a משנה תורה re-interpretation of the original language: האשה נקנית בג’ דרכים וקונה את עצמה בב’ דרכים.The opening thesis statement: האשה נקנית.  מאי שנא הכא דתני האשה נקנית ו ומה שכתב התם דתני האיש מקדש משום דקא בעי למיתני דתני ה כסף. Compare this to the closing משנה תורה restatement of the Opening thesis statement: מה יבמה שאינה יוצאת בגט יוציא בחליצה קמ”ל. ואימא ה”נ אמר קרא ספר כריתות. ספר כירתה, ואין דבר אחר כורתה Now the question stands: How does the closing thesis statement amplify the opening this statement?

        The phrase “A woman is acquired” refers to the legal framework of marriage in Jewish law (halacha). However, it is crucial to understand that this term does not imply that a woman is treated as a commodity or object like a slave or a prostitute. Instead, it reflects the formal legal process of marriage, which involves mutual consent and specific actions.  A Jewish woman is not comparable to a slave or a whore because her acquisition in marriage is based on mutual respect, commitment, and legal obligations. The concept of acquisition in marriage (kiddushin) is fundamentally different from the transactional nature of slavery or prostitution.

        Hence the closing thesis statement makes a מאי נפקא מינא separation/distinction between קידושין and חליצה.  These two points establish the sh’itta line of all the rest of the subject matter raised in the body of this the opening Mishna of קידושין.  

      823. Lebanon News: The Radical Change in the Balance of Power in the Middle East consequent to the Oct7th Abomination War.

        Lebanon has begun disarming non-state armed groups, specifically starting with Palestinian factions in camps such as Burj al-Barajneh, as part of a broader push to ensure weapons are held only by six official state security agencies. Additionally, Lebanon’s cabinet has approved the objectives of a U.S.-backed plan to disarm Hezbollah by the end of 2025, tasking the army to oversee this transition.

        In response, Hezbollah has outright rejected the plan, with its deputy leader Naim Kassem denouncing it as serving Israeli interests and warning against its implementation. Lebanon’s president has strongly rebuffed Iranian interference, emphasizing national sovereignty and rejecting foreign meddling—remarks delivered during a meeting with a senior Iranian official. Reports also indicate that Iran appears anxious about the implications of Hezbollah’s potential disarmament, viewing it as a major strategic setback to its regional influence.

        UNIFIL continues to operate across southern Lebanon, with its current mandate extended through August 31, 2025. The Security Council is debating a new resolution that not only aims to extend the mission, but also signals an eventual withdrawal of UNIFIL—contingent on the Lebanese government achieving full control over its territory and so long as a comprehensive political solution is in place.

        UNIFIL has experienced dangerous incidents in recent years: Israeli tanks forcibly entering UN positions, multiple attacks on watchtowers, and injuring or endangering peacekeepers. Locally, some communities have pushed back against UNIFIL patrols, especially when they occur without Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF) accompaniment, fueling tensions.

        A tragic incident on August 9, 2025, killed six Lebanese soldiers during munitions dismantling at a Hezbollah-linked depot, underscoring the persistent danger in the area. Its future beyond August hinges on Security Council deliberations and Lebanon’s ability to assume full security responsibilities.

        Despite a legislative ban by Israel that came into effect on January 30, 2025, targeting UNRWA’s operations in Israeli territory including East Jerusalem, UNRWA continues to provide essential aid in Gaza, the West Bank, and among refugee camps across the region. The agency has lost access to its Jerusalem headquarters, and many of its international staff have been forced to leave; yet, local staff remain on the ground delivering services under increasingly hostile conditions.

        Israel’s ban and accusations of UNRWA’s alleged ties to Hamas (including dismissals of some staff) have had far-reaching effects—diplomatic, legal, and operational. The agency remains under scrutiny, including court cases in the U.S. Still delivering critical services across Gaza and the West Bank, despite bans and evacuation of international staff.

      826. Let me see:
        Hamas commits horrendous crime.
        Hamas kidnaps hundreds of hostages.
        Hamas was supported by most Palestinians
        That justifies starving children and shooting families.
        You’re sick.

      847. Yawn Yawn. Let me repeat for the 100th time – I have visited Dachau. I used to teach about the horrors of the Holocaust. I am as far from denying it as you can get. It is you who is supporting the genocide of Palestinians.

      850. Accusation of genocide against Israel: This is a rhetorical weapon, not a serious legal or historical argument. The UN Genocide Convention defines genocide narrowly (intent to destroy a group in whole or part), and nothing in Israel’s Gaza war remotely fits the Shoah’s systematic annihilation program.

        Equating Gaza with the Shoah: This creates a false equivalence. It trivializes the Holocaust by comparing it to a conventional (albeit tragic and brutal) military conflict. That’s a classic form of Holocaust distortion, which scholars recognize as a component of Holocaust denial.

        Exposing the distortion: equating Shoah ↔ Gaza is not just “bad taste” but an active rewriting of history. Naming the antisemitism: Holocaust denial is a recognized form of antisemitism (see IHRA working definition). Turning the charge: Instead of defending Israel on impossible moral terrain (as if Jews must prove innocence of genocide), have unmasked the pig’s denial of Jewish historical trauma.

        Holocaust Denier as an accusation: It’s not exactly a counter-argument about Gaza itself (so in that sense it’s not a direct rebuttal). Have exposed the vast under-belly of this Opher pig. Made a valid exposure of the rhetorical abuse—that this pig antisemite, trafficks in Holocaust denial by trivialization.

      858. Two corrupt Av tuma avoda zarah teachers of Torah. 9.1.25 Maimonides and Maharishi II

        rabbielimallonRabbi Eli Mallon, M.Ed., LCSW

        Maharishi Mahesh YogimeditationspiritualityconsciousnessMaimonides

        Maharishi Mahesh Yogi and Maimonides discuss the same thing —the unchanging basis of all that exists.

        Maimonides discusses this as an idea/a subject for contemplation. Maharishi discusses the same as a personal experience in meditation.

        The experience confirms the idea.
        The idea clarifies the experience.
        At the same time,
        the experience clarifies the idea;
        the idea, in its universality,
        confirms the experience.

        I

        “1. The foundation of all foundations and the pillar of wisdom is to know that there is a Primary Being who brought into being all existence. All the beings of the heavens, the earth, and what is between them came into existence only from the truth [i.e. reality] of His being.

        2. If one would imagine that He [or: It] does not exist, no other being could possibly exist.

        3. If one would imagine that none of the entities aside from Him [or: It] exist, He alone would continue to exist, and the nullification of their [existence] would not nullify His existence, because all the [other] entities require Him and He, blessed be He, does not require them nor any one of them…

        4. This is implied by the prophet’s statement: ‘And God, your Lord, is true’ 1 – i.e., He alone is true and no other entity possesses truth that compares to His truth. This is what [is meant by] the Torah’s statement: ‘There is nothing else aside from Him’ 2 – i.e., aside from Him, there is no true existence like His.” 3

        II

        “This thing that the relative is born of (the Absolute), this is to understand what is behind the relative –changing, changing, changing. [i.e. the ‘Relative’ — always changing — is born of the ‘Absolute’ — never changing]. Now we analyze what this change is and what is the ultimate value of this change. Then we know that the change is very heavy, or very gross, very clear change on the surface.

        Deep within the change is lesser change, lesser change, lesser change. At the deepest value of change there is least change. Only when we try to know what exists underneath the change, what is the reality of change, then we come to know that there is no field of change.

        This is what physics does. All these molecules and then atoms and then electrons and then the subatomic particles and then very fine particles, and high energy, fine particles are high energy and then eventually ground state, least variation. Least variation means maximum order. Order increases. Disorder becomes less and less and less and less. That means activity becomes less and less and then eventually, vacuum state. This vacuum state may be said to be Absolute, non-changing, no change, nothing. And a little, little manifest value we may say, is that ground state where the things are not moving, no activity. But the ground state itself breathes life. There is something there, very fine, relative.

        So, this is analysis of the relative which eventually locates the Absolute in an area where relativity is nonexistent, beyond the finest relative existence, Absolute. So, this is physical analysis or analysis of the activity.

        In Indian philosophy it’s called Karma Mimamsa; Karma – action.

        Mimamsa – of action, analysis of action, analysis of action. What kind of action? Gross action, subtle action, subtler action, subtlest action. Now all this on the basis of a field of life which has no activity in it, vacuum state according to physics, Absolute according to the Science of Creative Intelligence, ultimate reality.

        Now it’s like the top of the mountain, very windy and as you come along the slope the wind is less and less and less and less. You come down the foot of the hill, no wind, it’s all protected. Great activity, less activity, less activity, no activity at the foot. Just like that, top of the mountain, the top. Now what is happening you’re on the top of the mountain? You are able to see vast distances. And as you come along on the slope you see less, you see less. Vision becomes restricted, vision becomes, because the height is less. You come to the foot of the mountain and you can see only this much.

        Now, the reality of vision at the foot of the mountain is completely different from the reality of the vision on the middle of the mountain.

        And this is completely different from the reality vision from the top of the mountain. So, when a man standing on the top of the mountain, he says, “Oh I’m seeing this much”, a man at the foot of the hill says, “I’m seeing this much”, both are correct. No one is false, correct because he sees only this much, he can only see this much and he can describe only this much. So, this is the reality of this stand. A man on the middle of the mountain, he has a different level of stand. From his level whatever he sees he describes. He is capable of describing more than the man on the foot of the mountain. But still that more is much less compared to the man on the top of the mountain.

        So, it depends upon at what level of awareness one experiences the environment. In Unity one experiences the environment. One finds no differences, nothing, he has a different picture of the world. In God Consciousness, completely a different picture of the world; the world is very fascinating, it’s beautiful. In CC, it has a completely different status, it’s always changing, I’m not changing. I have great superiority over all that which…. I’m the lord of all I survey and all that… CC. In transcendence the world doesn’t exist. In waking state everything is so dear and so fine and so nice, localized values, all localized. In dream it has a different fascination. In sleep nothing exists.” 4

        III

        Both Maharishi and Maimonides are telling us that full human perception embraces both the ever-changing creation and its/our unchanging source, too. Short of that, we’re not fully developed human beings.

        Is there a Biblical model for this?

        Yes — the perception of Adam and Havah/Eve in the Garden of Eden. Afterwards, Torah describes those for whom this perception was a normal experience as ones who “walked with God.” Later, the prophets exemplify this. King David — writer and singer of the Psalms — represents this, too.

        The promise of Torah and TaNaCh is that this will someday be the norm for all humanity, forever. As the Hasidic text “Tanya” teaches:

        “This, in fact, is the whole [purpose] of man and the purpose for which he, and all the worlds, both upper and lower, were created: that G‑d should have such a dwelling place here below…” 5

        1 Yirmiyahu/Jeremiah 10:10

        2 D’varim/Deuteronomy 4:35

        3 Maimonides: Mishnah Torah/Book of Knowledge 1:1-4; see also Yesodei ha-Torah 1:1

        4 Maharishi Mahesh Yogi
        La Antilla, Spain
        March 3, 1973 (transcribed from a video tape)
        https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=10238341431783073&set=gm.2796773693840717&idorvanity=442978549220255

        5 Tanya; ch. 33
        ___________________________
        ___________________________

        Maharishi Mahesh Yogi and Maimonides on parallel tracks. Both of them failed to distinguish two radically different systems of law – the fundamental day and night distinction between Jewish common law from Roman statute law.

        T’NaCH\Talmudic משנה תורה Legislative review-Constitutional common law – inductive, precedent-based, always applied within the צדק צדק תרדוף “Torah Faith” of courtroom context (עדות, דינים, פרשנות). Knowledge of God (ידע), directly bound to how justice defines Faith as an eternal obligation of Israel’s acceptance of the Torah at Sinai. Based upon the precedent and testimony of Moshe and Aaron standing before the Court of Par’o and the abuse of beating Hebrew slaves.

        “Foundation of foundations” in Rambam’s Yesodei HaTorah a false codified abstraction—but in the Mishna/Gemara world, “foundation” means judicial justice; procedural rules wherein judges and common law Sanhedrin lateral courtrooms build precedent-based “Brief” wherein the prosecutor and defense attorneys – Beit Shammai and Beit Hillel argue their precedent “Briefs” before one another in court. This latter common law “foundation”, it and it alone functions as the legal bedrock יסוד, not assimilated Greek or Roman metaphysical speculation abstractions.

        Roman statute law (and Indian metaphysics) – deductive, top-down, treating truth as an absolute principle or essence outside of human courtroom process. The 8th middah of the revelation of the Oral Torah at Horev defines truth as “PATH” or “Halacha”. Both Maharishi and Rambam slip into the Greek/Roman assimilation mold; a direct Torah violation of negative commandments. Their philosophical Absolute – a static ontological given. Not a lived בניני אבות Sinai oath alliance to rule the conquered lands of Canaan with Sanhedrin common law courtroom justice; which like a korban dedicates the Chosen Cohen People to pursue tohor time-oriented commandments to pursue justice – fair compensation of damages – among our People. Both these latter day men, they replicate Catholic dogmatism – “unchanging source” – in purely ontological terms (what exists beneath existence), instead of Torah faith which defines acceptance of the Torah at Sinai as צדק צדק תרדוף.

        Maharishi frames faith in terms of direct experience in meditation (phenomenology). Whereas Rambam frames faith in terms of rational proof and contemplation (philosophy). He prioritizes gnostic knowledge above “Fear of Heaven”; meaning the walk to build and protect ones’ ‘Good Name’ reputation.

        But both of these “Latter Day Saints” bypass the Talmudic way of the Cohen worship through tohor middot; specifically applicable through the concrete practice of common law courts, precedent based “Briefs”, and justice—which strives to make fair compensation of damages inflicted by Party A upon Party B among the chosen Cohen seed of the Avot.

        If we bring the T’NaCH model of mussar-aggadic common law in properly: Adam & Havah “walking with God” does not compare to these assimilated “Latter Day Saints” mystical union. Shalom among our Chosen Cohen People within the borders of the oath sworn lands: “walking in trust” the יסוד bedrock upon which stands שלום and NOT hatred without cause among our people. Later “Enoch walked with God,” “Noach walked with God,” and Avraham – chosen “to keep the way of the Lord … to do justice and righteousness” (la‘asot tzedaka u-mishpat). The real Torah framework: knowledge of God = justice done in community to restore שלום among our divided people who always struggle with our Yatzir Ha’Rah to fight Civil Wars among ourselves.

        Contrast this with the ערב רב שאין להם יראת שמים – the assimilated Roman/Indian metaphysics = Absolute/essence/unchanging source. This נידוי narishkeit stands outside of the oath brit alliance to pursue justice among and between our people. Unlike Maharishi’s “phenomenology,” aggadah does not chase mystical states—it illustrates the human cost of injustice and commands judges to persue precedent-based בניני אבות judicial fairness. Maharishi and Rambam both speak in terms of “Absolute Being” but collapse Torah’s judicial Faith framework based upon the false foundations of Greek/Roman metaphysics. By stark contrast Torah faith = צדק צדק תרדוף. Sanhedrin common law, courtroom-precedent based legalism; fair compensation for damages inflicted, mussar-aggadic framework of walking with God by doing tohor time-oriented commandments with k’vanna.

      861. The utter and total bankruptcy of European church theology has made this dead religion stink like a rotting corps in the Mid Summer day’s oppressive heat.

        Barth argued that God reveals Himself primarily through Jesus Christ and the Scriptures. He emphasized that human understanding of God must come from divine revelation rather than human reason or experience. The horrors of the Nazi Shoah revealed that Goyim worship air and no God. Jesus and his Father in Heaven – as dead as a door nail.

        Barth’s obtuse theology distinguished between the “Word of God” (Jesus Christ) and the “words of men” (human interpretations). He believed that true theology must focus on the former, asserting that any human attempt to understand God must be grounded in the revelation of Christ. What utter pie in the sky religious rhetoric nonsense. The bible sophomoric translations of the Hebrew T’NaCH — all written by men. Most of whom had absolutely no or very little knowledge of Hebrew and Aramaic – the original language of the Hebrew T’NaCH.

        None of the sophomoric bible Xtian translators new the difference between T’NaCH and Talmudic common law from Roman statute law. None of these absolute ignoramuses understood the difference between Rabbi Akiva’s kabbalah of פרדס inductive reasoning from Aristotle’s deductive syllogism reasoning! The two divergent logic formats day and night different. Yet uneducated Xtian translators of their so called “Word of God” bibles as ignorant as bees on the rump of a braying ass.

        Barth often contrasted the Pauline utter religious rhetoric theological nonsense of “Human sinfulness (Original Sin of Adam) with God’s grace. Never does his empty religious rhetoric ever question how grace as a Godly attribute revealed to Moshe at Horev distinguishes itself from Mercy or Great Chessed or Truth ect other attributes revealed to Moshe at Horev 40 days after the Sin of the Golden Calf.

        Barth’s theology of a Universal God argues that this God owns absolute sovereignty, wholly transcendent. Which completely ignores the Jewish Tribal God revealed only to Israel at Sinai, which the Xtian and Muslim religions utterly rejected that revelation, which understands HaShem as a local tribal God of the Hebrew Chosen Cohen people alone. Outside of Judea/Israel HaShem as a local tribal God has absolutely no sovereignty transcendent rule.

        Hence outside of the oath sworn lands no one can worship HaShem לשמה; this represents the Torah curse imposed upon g’lut/exiled Jews. And Goyim who never accepted the revelation of the Torah at Sinai – how much more so! Central to Barth’s theology is the belief that all theological reflection must be centered on Christ. This narishkeit exposes Av tumah avoda zarah; Torah defines faith as the righteous pursuit of judicial justice wherein the Sanhedrin common law courts strive to make fair compensation of damages inflicted by Party A upon Party B.

        Av tumah avoda zarah promote theological creed rhetoric which dictates what believers must believe in this or that or some other God. Bonhoeffer’s political stance against the Nazis is admirable — he resisted a church that bent its knee to Hitler. But the substance of his theology remained trapped within the very Christian framework of Barth’s bankrupt and void theology. Barth and Bonhoeffer both anchor “truth” in Christology, a theological rhetoric divorced from judicial justice or covenantal precedent. Both preserve Pauline substitution theology (sin/grace, Christ as “Word of God”), which replaces Torah’s oath alliance revelation with mythic universality.

        Neither ever engaged in Torah common law precedent vs. Roman statute law — nor did they recognize the practical, courtroom-based definition of faith as צדק צדק תרדוף. Bonhoeffer opposed Nazism, but he did so with bankrupt theological tools. His “religionless Christianity” or “cost of discipleship” never escaped Barth’s fundamental error: mistaking a theological creed for covenantal justice. Even resistance to Nazi tyranny in German Protestant circles still operated inside the false logic of avoda zarah. They never questioned the Pauline framework that itself fed centuries of Jew-hatred, pogroms, blood libels, and ultimately the Shoah.

      880. Its now the month of Elul. The Jewish saying: The King is in the fields. T’shuva requires remembering the sin of the Golden Calf and how HaShem threatened to break the sworn oath alliance cut with Avraham Yitzak and Yaacov.

        Understanding Shotrim/police in the Context of Prophets: Prophets in ancient Israel, such as Samuel, were instrumental in anointing kings (e.g., Saul and David) and had the authority to remove them when they strayed from God’s commandments. This role underscores their significant influence in governance and leadership. While Shotrim typically refers to the enforcers of the Sanhedrin’s rulings, the term can also encompass a broader understanding of those who uphold the law and moral order, which includes the prophetic role. Prophets, as Shotrim, enforce divine law and moral standards, guiding the people and leaders in their adherence to God’s will. The connection between prophets and Shotrim highlights the integration of spiritual and legal authority in ancient Israel. Prophets not only provided spiritual guidance but also played a crucial role in the political landscape, influencing the leadership and direction of the nation.

      887. Rejecting Religious Rhetoric as False.

        Rubies Corner’s Blog·rubiescorner.wordpress.com

        Did I Tell You?

        I finished my Bible, and now I am reading it again. I have a goal for this year, so I don’t hesitate to pick up my Bible and read for awhile. Since I just finished, I am starting over….

        You could try learning the Hebrew T’NaCH – a radically different collection of books – rather than reading your Xtian bible translations. The Hebrew T’NaCH has translations, it even includes the non Jewish chapters and verses which so completely pervert the Xtian bible sophomoric translations. What difference does Order make? God vs Dog.

        The T’NaCH organized into sugyot (translated as sub-chapters). What difference does this make? The fundamental basis of the Hebrew T’NaCH stands upon a fundamental question. Does a person learn this literature לשמה או לא לשמה? To quote Shakespeare: To be or not to be — That is the question.

        Sophomoric bible translations never once bring the Name revealed in the opening Sinai commandment. Because the Xtian church does not accept the revelation of the Torah at Sinai, it worships their own versions of the Golden Calf. טיפש פשט – translated as bird brained – makes literal translations of abstract obstruse ideas of mussar. This latter term, mussar, it defines the meaning of the word “prophesy”. Prophets command mussar. Meaning that this prophetic mussar applies to all generations of bnai brit who ever walk the face of the Earth.

        Prophets do not predict the future as the Roman counterfeit new testament: “fulfill the words of the prophets” falsely proclaims. The Torah refers to this concept of “prophesy” which it describes through the “prophet” Bil’aam; that prophet practiced כשוף – witchcraft or sorcery, practices that involve magical or supernatural powers; engaging in Av tuma avoda zarah – forbidden or occult practices forbidden by the 2nd Sinai commandment.

        The Roman forgery known as the new testament employs a lot of Greek rhetoric. Greek rhetoric: undefined critical terms upon which a religious or political witch “hangs” all subsequent ideas. Obama in the 2008 election employed the witchcraft rhetoric of “CHANGE”. The key term that won two Presidential elections for him. Problem: never in eight years did he ever once make any attempt to define this magical term “CHANGE”. The Arab false prophet Muhammad did the exact same thing in his Koran.

        The word “prophet” repeated over and again and again. Never once does the Koran ever define the abstract obstruse term “prophet”. The new testament projects a definition of the term prophet, as mentioned above, that duplicates the Torah concept of witchcraft – predicting the future. The Hebrew T’NaCH defines prophesy as “MUSSAR”; prophets do not predict the future but rather their mussar applies equally to all generations. The outcome of this critical T’NaCH definition of this absolutely critical term “prophet” … T’NaCH commands prophetic mussar but it does NOT teach history. This subtle shift requires a bit of time to sink in once consciousness.

        Another example of religious rhetoric which the new testament forgery employs, the Apostle Paul, its concept of 1. You are not under the Law. 2. Original Sin of Adam, guilt complex employed to serve as the pretext for the death and resurrection of JeZeus. 1. The rhetoric of “law”; T’NaCH defines “law” as Judicial courtroom judgments – as law. Whereas Roman law exists as rules and regulations imposed by Caesar or the Roman Senate. Paul’s rhetoric “not under the law” fails to differentiate between judicial common law vs. legislative statute law. Hence Xtians “read” their bible sophomoric translations oblivious that T’NaCH instructs judicial common law through a Case/Rule style. This latter type of “law” stands upon the foundation of earlier judicial courtroom “precedent” rulings. Statute law has not such requirement which would force a person to write a ‘legal brief’ and present possible similar and related court room ruling made prior to the current case heard before the Court. The subtle distinction that comes out of making a comparison of similar Case/Rule judicial judgments – the revelation of the Oral Torah at Horev which rabbi Akiva’s kabbalah defines as פרדס p’shat remiz drosh sod.

        This logic system format radically different from Aristotle’s 3 part Syllogism. Akiva’s logic format – inductive reason; whereas Aristotle’s methodology deductive reasoning. Both systems of logic have their strengths and weaknesses. But Paul’s religious rhetoric: “You are not under the Law”, obliterated any and all distinctions which separate common law from statute law and inductive logic from deductive logic.

        The other Pauline term of religious rhetoric: Original Sin. It implies that humanity inherits guilt from Adam’s transgression. The church amplified this concept into a Fire and brimstone Heaven/Hell God/Satan polarity, which later developed into Calvin’s doctrine of complete Human depravity. Based upon the presumption of Paul’s “Original Sin”. Meaning: that the will of fallen Man enslaved in bondage to sin, and individuals cannot exercise free will as their “Moses” liberator who leads the enslaved church to salvation. Herein the requirement for the resurrection of JeZeus. Central to Calvin’s theology, the doctrine of predestination, defines his religious rhetoric. This Golden Calf replacement theology subsumes the Torah Central theme of “the Chosen Cohen People who do service to HaShem through the dedication of tohor middot” to the replacement church which believes in a false messiah JeZeus. The latter term refers to the 13 Attributes which became revealed to Moshe on Yom Kippur 40 days after the sin of the Golden Calf wherein the ערב רב/mixed multitudes replaced the Divine Presence Spirit Name with the word אלהים. The 13 attributes, they define the revelation of the Written Torah at Sinai. How?

        These 13 “middot” (translated as measurements) breath as living Spirits from within the Yatzir Ha’Tov within the heart. Air comes from the lungs but tohor spirits come from the heart. Hence the Talmud refers to tefillah as a “matter of the heart”. Whereas the book of the gospel John declares that the Logos/word – not just a spoken word but also a principle of order and knowledge. It refers to JeZeus as the pre-existent divine being. Logos/word rhetoric salad asserts “the Word was God” which establishes the belief in the full divinity of JeZeus.

        The revelation of the Golden Calf rejects substitute theology as the definition of Av tuma (evil inclination spirits within the heart called Yatrir Ha’Rah) of avoda zarah (often mistranslated as idolatry). Therefore then how does the Hebrew T’NaCH “study” rather than simply read Common law (משנה תורה)? The first book of בראשית introduces Av tohor mitzvot – known as time-oriented commandments. The next three books of the Written Torah introduce secondary commandments (תולדות) which function as legal precedents. The last 5th book of the Torah (משנה תורה) confirms the mandate of judicial common law as ‘Legislative Review’. Meaning the common law Sanhedrin courts have not only a veto over lower government statute laws but can entirely re-write the lower government statute law and present them now as Torah common laws.

        In short, Paul’s religious rhetoric of “Original Sin” supplanted the main Torah theme of exile/g’lut as expressed through Adam’s expusion from the Garden, Noach’s Ark, the enslavement of Israel in Egypt, and the 40 year Wilderness story.

      895. Millions of Goyim do not determine Israeli strategic interests any more than Germans in their millions do not determine British Ireland colonialism.

      900. Post Shoah pick up your cross from the Nazi death camps: By their fruits you shall know them … and fuck off with your dead religion.

      912. Bull shit faggot fart for brains, what about the starving Israeli Oct7th hostages? Vile one sided sorry sack of shit.

      913. Yes horrendous. Hamas are scum. But I didn’t realise that it was the children who kidnapped them. Certainly justifies starving women and children and bombing families, doesn’t it?

      914. Not interested in your back handed after the fact condemnation of Ham-ass. Hamass refuses to return the stolen Hostages of Oct 7th 2023. Shit 4 brains. Hamass insists they will repeat the Oct 7th Abomination again and again and again.

      915. They are holding on to them as a bargaining tool. If they give them back they will be destroyed. It’s all they have.

      918. Only a bloated opinionated moron attempts to compare the conduct of the IDF in Gaza with Hamas in its tunnel dungeons. Fuck YOU.

      921. Addressing the Av Mishna of קידושין

        The Mishna of קידושין does not simply record dialectical disputes as a form of “preserving judicial disputes.” It functions like a court record. Beit Hillel serves as the Tort judge defense attorney. Whereas Beit Shammai functions as the prosecuting attorney. Now this distinction – significant because it distinguishes lateral common law courts from vertical Goyim courtrooms.

        Great Britain operates Common law court rooms just as does Talmudic common law! However, in the case of the British Courts, all statute laws imposed by the British Parliament in London – they define the British Constitution. As such, no common law British courtroom can over-turn any statute law passed by Parliament. Torah common law, known as משנה תורה operates completely differently – despite being a common law courtroom which absolutely requires earlier court room judicial rulings as precedents. Both court systems stand on this shared foundation of common law.

        None-the-less ספר דברים mandates “Legislative Review”, a critical interpretation of the intent of משנה תורה. Torah Sanhedrin common law courts have the Torah Constitutional mandate to over-rule any government statute law imposed by any of the 12 Tribes of the Republic or the Central Government of king David. A Torah prophet serves as an agent of the Great Sanhedrin Court. As such prophets can anoint a man from any tribe of Israel – KING.

        And Great Sanhedrin Court prophets can remove any king from Office. As the prophet Shmuel did with king Shaul. This fundamental distinction of Torah Great Sanhedrin courtroom powers of “Legislative Review” differentiates Torah lateral courts from Goyim vertical courts. The latter court the State pays the salary of the judges and the prosecuting attorneys. As such a court case pits פלוני vs. the State. The Torah refers to the state paying the salaries of Judges and prosecuting attorneys as “bribes”. צדק צדק תרדוף absolutely abhors bribery; it qualifies as an example of Av tuma avoda zarah?

        This abstract term defines the 2nd Sinai commandment. Do not copy the culture and customs practiced by the Goyim and do not marry foreign women who reject the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. Judicial justice serves as the כתר Av tohor time-oriented commandment which stands upon תמיד מעשה בראשית. The kabbalah that doing tohor time-oriented commandments creates the chosen cohen people from nothing. Hence the Torah begins with בראשית. Mesechta ברכות teaches that the world was created for the sake of the Jewish people. Who exactly qualifies as the Jewish people? The chosen seed of Avraham Yitzak and Yaacov – the chosen Cohen people.

        Obviously, Cohen, Levi, Israel – לאו דוקא terms of reference. A precedent proof, the din that tefillah stands in the stead of korbanot. Amalek – antisemites – continually refer to the Jewish people as a race. The Nazis referred to Jews as “the inferior Race”. Jewish inheritance determined from the mother. However, the central obligation of קידושין, as a pre-condition of marriage, upon the father to educate his children in the oath brit/alliance faith.

        Our Mishna compares to ברכות which opens with kre’a shma ערבית, just as the Av Mishna of קידושין opens with האשה. The vertical courtrooms of Goyim jurisprudence the prosecuting attorney prioritized over the defense attorney. But the model of Sanhedrin courts the reverse. The Halacha follows after Hillel!

        The Xtian Bible and Muslim Koran both fail to acknowledge that Torah prophets serve as the “police” of the Sanhedrin courts! Hence neither Muhammad nor JeZeus could qualify as prophets. This מאי נפקא מינא distinction equally applies to the acquisition of a wife. The Baal acquires his soul through marriage. The qualifications for serving as a judge in a Jewish court (Beit Din) includes personal attributes and life experiences that are deemed important for this role.

        The Talmud suggests that an unmarried man is generally considered less fit to serve as a judge. This is because marriage is seen as a significant life experience that contributes to a person’s maturity and understanding of family dynamics, which can be relevant in legal matters. Similarly, the absence of children can also be viewed as a factor that affects a person’s qualifications.

        Having children is believed to provide additional insights into the responsibilities and challenges of family life, which can inform a judge’s decisions. The underlying principle is that judges should possess a deep understanding of human nature and the complexities of life, which are often gained through personal experiences such as marriage and parenthood.

        What specifically does a man acquire through wife and family? Answer: Fear of Heaven. A Sanhedrin Judge by definition has an excellent Good Name reputation.

      925. Prior to the Oct7th Abomination War a Constitutional Crisis over the power of the Supreme Court of Israel exploded and threatened the continuation of the Knesset Government in Jerusalem. Currently Israel has no Constitution. But based upon the 1917 and ’22 Balfour Declaration and Palestine mandate which defines Zionism as the Jewish right to self-determination in the Middle East … self-determination defined as the Jewish right to establish a Constitutional government in our own country.
        ______________________________
        ______________________________
        mosckerr Uncategorized August 21, 2025
        J-Wire

        http://www.jwire.com.au

        Shabbat Reay
        Prophecy The concept of a prophet is central to the Torah reading this week. But what exactly is a prophet? And what is a prophet’s role? The Hebrew word for a prophet is…
        ___________________________________________
        ___________________________________________
        Prophets serve as the “police” of the Sanhedrin common law lateral courts. These courts mandated with משנה תורה, interpreted to mean — “Legislative Review”. For example: Samuel, Nathan, Ahijah, Elijah, Hosea – major and minor prophets – Anointed and/or deposed Kings. This Torah constitutional mandate of Sanhedrin common law\משנה תורה courtrooms based upon the Book of D’varim having the second Name of משנה תורה.

        Legislative Review radically different and set apart from British Common law courtrooms. The latter cannot void a law passed by Parliament. Parliamentary “statute law” defines the Constitution of England. Hence no common law British court has the power to overturn any law passed by Parliament. Not so Sanhedrin common law courts. Any law imposed by any tribal leader within the 12 Tribes of the Israelite Republic and even statute laws imposed by a king of Yechuda or Israel, the Great Sanhedrin common law lateral courts possess the Constitutional mandate of משנה תורה to void and overturn.

      927. As of August 18, 2025, MSNBC will officially change its name to My Source News Opinion World, abbreviated as MS NOW. This significant rebranding is part of a broader corporate restructuring following NBC Universal’s decision to spin off several cable networks, including MSNBC, into a new company called Versant.

        The rebranding of MSNBC to MS NOW is not directly attributed to the Russia-Gate controversy, but it does reflect broader shifts in the media landscape and the network’s evolving identity. While the name change to MS NOW is part of a corporate restructuring and an effort to establish a distinct identity, it also signals a desire to move beyond past controversies and focus on future content and audience engagement. The network aims to redefine itself in a rapidly changing media environment, rather than being solely defined by its past coverage of Trump and Russia-Gate.

        While the Russia-Gate saga played a role in shaping MSNBC’s identity and audience during Trump’s first term, the decision to rebrand is more about the network’s strategic direction and independence following its spin-off from NBC Universal. The Russia-Gate controversy has been a contentious topic, particularly regarding how various media outlets, including MSNBC and its prominent host Rachel Maddow, covered the investigation into alleged Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election. During the Russia-Gate saga, she focused on various aspects of the investigation, including connections between the Trump campaign and Russian officials.

        The Mueller Report, released in 2019, concluded that while there were numerous contacts between the Trump campaign and Russian operatives, the investigation did not establish that the campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference efforts. The characterization of Rachel Maddow’s promotion of the Russia-Gate narrative as a “hoax” reflects a polarized political landscape where interpretations of media coverage can vary widely. Media overreach, Trump 2.0 has exposed. Political journalism promoted by a Pravda press corporate established monopoly – that ship has sailed.

        The characterization of media outlets, including MSNBC and figures like Rachel Maddow, as part of a “Pravda press” reflects a growing sentiment among some groups that mainstream media serves specific political agendas rather than providing unbiased reporting. This perception contributes to the polarization of public opinion and distrust in traditional news sources. The consolidation of media ownership has raised concerns about the diversity of viewpoints presented in the news. Critics argue that corporate interests can shape narratives, leading to a lack of accountability and a focus on sensationalism over substantive reporting. This has led to calls for more independent journalism that prioritizes transparency and integrity.

        The Lame Stream Legacy Media – Fake News – dead in the water. The rise of alternative media platforms and independent journalists presents opportunities for diverse perspectives but also challenges regarding credibility and reliability. The call for a more balanced and accountable media is increasingly relevant in this context.

        Streaming media outlets like Google You Tube attract far larger News viewing audience than does Cable Television. Streaming platforms like YouTube have attracted a larger and more diverse audience compared to traditional cable news channels. This is largely due to the accessibility of online content, allowing viewers to watch news on-demand and from various sources. YouTube and similar platforms enable greater interaction between content creators and viewers. Users can comment, share, and engage with news stories in real-time, fostering a sense of community and participation that traditional cable news often lacks.

        Streaming platforms offer a wide range of news content, from professional journalism to independent reporting and commentary. This diversity allows viewers to choose sources that align with their interests and perspectives, contributing to a more personalized news experience. Many viewers are moving away from cable subscriptions due to high costs. Streaming services often provide free or lower-cost options, making news more accessible to a broader audience. Younger generations, in particular, are more inclined to consume news through digital platforms rather than traditional cable. This trend is reshaping how news organizations approach content delivery, often prioritizing online engagement and social media presence.

        While streaming platforms provide diverse viewpoints, they also face challenges related to misinformation and the spread of unverified content. News organizations must navigate these issues to maintain credibility and trust with their audiences. Face Book, once the biggest player has seen its market share collapse after it together with Twitter threw the 2020 elections by censoring the Hunter Biden laptop scandal and Hillery Clinton’s treason.

        The platforms’ decisions to limit the spread of this Hunter Biden laptop story constituted censorship and influenced public perception of both Biden and President Trump as Presidential candidates. Following the election and the controversies surrounding content moderation, Facebook has experienced fluctuations in user engagement and market share. Some users have expressed dissatisfaction with perceived biases in content moderation, leading to calls for alternatives and contributing to a decline in trust. The actions taken by social media platforms during the election have contributed to increased polarization among users. Supporters of former President Donald Trump and other critics argue that the platforms unfairly targeted conservative viewpoints.

        The controversies surrounding social media’s role in the election have led to increased scrutiny from lawmakers and regulators. Discussions about potential regulations to address issues of censorship, misinformation, and the power of tech companies have gained momentum. As trust in traditional social media platforms has waned, some users have migrated to alternative platforms that promote themselves as free speech advocates. This shift reflects a broader trend of users.

        The narrative surrounding the Hunter Biden laptop story has had a profound impact on public perception, influencing how voters viewed both Joe Biden and Donald Trump as presidential candidates. The narrative surrounding this story became a focal point for discussions about media bias and the role of social media in shaping political narratives.

        Following the election, platforms like Facebook have seen fluctuations in user engagement and market share. Many users have voiced their dissatisfaction with perceived biases in content moderation, which has led to a decline in trust. This dissatisfaction has prompted some users to seek alternatives, contributing to a shift in the social media landscape. The actions taken by social media platforms during the election have exacerbated polarization among users. Supporters of Donald Trump and other critics argue that conservative viewpoints were unfairly targeted, leading to a perception of bias that further divides users along political lines.

        In response to these controversies, lawmakers and regulators have increased their scrutiny of social media’s role in elections. There is a growing discussion about potential regulations aimed at addressing issues of censorship, misinformation, and the significant power held by tech companies. This scrutiny reflects a broader concern about the influence of social media on democratic processes. As trust in traditional social media platforms declines, many users are migrating to alternative platforms that advocate for free speech. This trend indicates a significant shift in user behavior, as individuals vote with their feet and seek spaces that align more closely with their contempt for content moderation and censorship which rapes Free Speech.

        The Lame Stream Media concealment of the mental health of President Biden and the flavor of ice cream he likes soft ball questions has aroused a strong sense among the American people that the Corporate Government established monopolies have betrayed American Constitutional Rights.

        Critics argue that the Lame-stream media often downplays or conceals information that could influence public perception. This has led to a growing sentiment among some Americans that the media is not fulfilling its role as an independent watchdog, but rather acting in alignment with corporate interests. The perception that corporate entities, including media organizations, have employed their lobbies to have the government to establish protected monopolies – far from limited to Obama-care corruption – raises concerns about the integrity of democratic processes. Many individuals feel that these government established & protected government monopolies prioritize profits over the public good, leading to a betrayal of American Constitutional Rights. This sentiment, particularly strong among those who believe that the media should provide unbiased information and hold public figures accountable.

        As a result of these perceptions, there is a growing erosion of trust in both the media and government institutions e.g. corporate protected monopolies, first and foremost Wilson’s 1913 Federal Reserve. Many Americans feel that their rights to access truthful information and engage in open discourse are being compromised. This distrust results in increased polarization which rips the fabric of our society as a nation. A sense of disconnection from the political process, makes Americans distrust the bought and paid for political process that “styles” itself as a “Democracy”.

        In light of these concerns, there are calls for greater accountability from both media organizations and government Corporate protected monopoly entities. Advocates argue for the need to ensure that media coverage is fair, transparent, and representative of diverse viewpoints. Rather than a propaganda vomit of emotional opinions and superficial over reactions.

        Additionally, there is a push for regulations that address the influence of corporate interests on public discourse and democratic processes. The ongoing discussions about media representation, corporate influence, and the protection of constitutional rights will continue to shape the political landscape and public sentiment in the United States. Addressing these issues is crucial for restoring trust and ensuring a healthy Republic, wherein the State Legislatures determine what Federal Senators and Congress-persons present as bills before Congress.

      928. Collusion and interference! Russia wanted Trump. He made the USA weaker and Europe weaker. He threatened NATO. That’s what Russia wanted. They bought the election for Trump!

      929. You promote the Obozo and bitch Hillary propaganda. Both of them just might face a criminal trial in their near future. Nato country of SUCK europe did not meet their spending quota alliance agreements.

        You know nothing how the US Republic works. Just a silly loud mouth dumbass.

      930. Bollocks. Obama was 50x smarter that the orange blob. It’s the orange blob who’s the paedo and convicted felon. You’re so gullible.

      939. The great historian AJP Taylor said we were still living in nthe Dark Ages
        Taylor often argued that history was shaped more by accidents and unintended consequences than by grand designs or moral arcs. So when he said we’re still in the Dark Ages, he was critiquing modern society’s pretensions to enlightenment, suggesting that ignorance, injustice, and folly persist despite our technological and intellectual advances.

      940. Once more you distort and take a idea stolen completely out of context! You are a Nazi pig. A.J.P. Taylor, a prominent British historian, is known for his provocative statements and interpretations of history. When he referred to the idea that “we were still living in the Dark Ages,” he commented A.J.P. Taylor, a prominent British historian, is known for his provocative statements and interpretations of history. When he referred to the idea that “we were still living in the Dark Ages,” his reference to the Dark Ages, typically understood as a time of cultural and economic decline in Europe following the fall of the Roman Empire. The context of his statement may also relate to the events of the 20th century, including the two World Wars and the Cold War, which could have led him to feel that humanity was repeating past mistakes.

        A.J.P. Taylor’s views on the Roman Empire and its legacy have indeed sparked considerable debate among historians. His perspective often emphasized the achievements and contributions of the Roman Empire, which he saw as a period of significant cultural and political development. However, this viewpoint has faced criticism and rejection from many historians for several reasons. Critics argue that Taylor’s portrayal of the Roman Empire as a purely “enlightened” period oversimplifies the complexities of history. The Roman Empire was marked by significant social inequalities, political corruption, and brutal military conquests, which are often downplayed in more romanticized narratives.

        Taylor’s focus on the Roman Empire can lead to a neglect of other civilizations that also contributed to human progress. Historians emphasize the importance of diverse cultures and societies, such as those in Asia, Africa, and the Americas, which also played crucial roles in shaping world history. The term “Dark Ages” itself has been criticized for its negative connotations. Many historians now view this period as one of transformation rather than stagnation, highlighting the cultural and intellectual developments that occurred in Europe and beyond during the early medieval period. Some historians argue that Taylor’s pro-Roman stance may reflect a Eurocentric or imperialistic viewpoint that aligns with certain political ideologies. This perspective can be seen as problematic, especially in the context of post-colonial studies, which seek to deconstruct narratives that glorify imperial powers.

        A.J.P. Taylor’s revisionist approach to history, particularly regarding the causes of World War I and his views on the Roman Empire, has indeed drawn criticism from various historians. While it’s challenging to compile an exhaustive list of all historians who have condemned his work, several notable figures have expressed dissenting views or critiques of his interpretations.

        A prominent Marxist historian, Eric Hobsbawm, criticized Taylor’s interpretations for being overly simplistic and for neglecting the broader social and economic contexts that shaped historical events. Geoffrey Elton, a historian of Tudor England, was critical of Taylor’s methodology and his tendency to prioritize narrative over rigorous analysis. He believed that Taylor’s approach could lead to misleading conclusions.

        A military historian, John Keegan, challenged Taylor’s views on the causes of World War I, arguing that Taylor’s emphasis on individual leaders and decisions overlooked the complex web of alliances and social factors that contributed to the war. David Cannadine, a historian of modern Germany, has expressed concerns about Taylor’s revisionist history, particularly regarding his views on the Nazi regime and the implications of his arguments for understanding totalitarianism.

        While Niall Ferguson has his own controversial views, he has critiqued Taylor’s romanticized view of the British Empire and the Roman Empire, arguing for a more nuanced understanding of imperialism’s impacts. These historians represent a range of perspectives that challenge A.J.P. Taylor’s revisionist history. Their critiques often focus on the need for a more comprehensive understanding of historical events, considering social, economic, and cultural factors rather than relying solely on political narratives.

      941. YOU never bring anyone from your blog who agrees with your Bull Shit. For example:

        The UN a tits on a boar hog utterly useless nonsense institution. Both the League of Nations and …
        Avatar
        John Neff
        9h agotherealistjuggernaut.wordpress.com
        You’re absolutely right that history shows how governments exploit instability by manufacturing enemies and external crises. Pogroms, scapegoats, and proxy wars all follow that same pattern — displacement of blame to avoid accountability. The UN was supposed to be a counterweight to that instinct, yet it’s become the very stage where propaganda and power plays thrive instead of solutions.

        But here’s the larger problem: world governance without enforceable mechanisms was doomed the moment it became more about theatrics than teeth. No sanctions worth their name, no penalties that bite, no accountability for those who weaponize the platform. The UN has turned into a clearinghouse for rhetoric — meanwhile real diplomacy, the kind that rewires alliances and reshapes borders, happens offstage in closed rooms where ambassadors and back-channel deals carry actual weight.

        I agree, diplomacy is never a popularity contest. The Rome Treaty and Hague precedent you mention illustrate exactly how credibility flows from binding structures, not empty resolutions. A family is built through commitments — not through shouting matches in a rented hall. Until accountability exists, the UN will remain more theatre than tribunal, and its stage lights will only amplify the voices of those who know how to weaponize spectacle.

      942. Another witness

        mosckerr on My Art My Passion #amazing#drawing
        The Time has come to shutter the UN. Wilson’s Pie in the Sky notions of Peace not just rejected …
        Avatar
        vermavkv
        9h agoinfotainmentbyvijaydata.wordpress.com
        nice information.

      948. None of your business. Idiot you have no צנועה. Simply a gross fat pig who jabbers on subjects you know absolutely nothing about other than what you read from shallow reactionary newspapers.

      949. Selective Memories

        loboteroIn Saner Thought

        Historical Events
        NOTE: This is not necessarily about the current mash-up in Gaza just a few observations that I have made in my many years.

        I would like to reiterate that I am NOT anti-Jew, personally I do not give a shit about their religious beliefs.

        This post is more about the selective memories of the American people than it is about the current situation.

        WARNING: This post may include some offensive language that may offend the sensibilities of some readers….so if you are easily offended then maybe this post is not for you.

        The date is 04 November 1979….US ally Iran has had months of protests against the policies and tactics of the Shah and on this date Iranian students stormed the walls of the US embassy in Tehran breaching them and taking 52 Americans hostage which were held for 444 days until their release on 20 January 1981.

        Since that fateful day Americans have despised anything remotely Iranian. (There so much more to that action than just a bunch of pissed off students)

        To this day they, Iran, can do nothing right in the eyes of most Americans….for they are evil.

        The date is 08 June 1967….during the 6 Day war when Israel was fighting against the combined forces of the Arab nations.

        The US signit ship, USS Liberty, was patrolling in the Eastern Mediterranean….when suddenly the ship was attacked by Israeli jets and gunboats….the attack left 34 American sailors dead and 174 wounded.

        Yet Americans ignore this murderous attack and support Israel in everything they do….why?

        If you are interested, which you are not, I have a post the has articles about this attack….fucking read them and see what our good ally is capable of doing.
        ___________________________
        ___________________________

        Prior to the outbreak of the 2nd Israeli War of Independence, commonly referred to by Goyim as the June 6 Day War, France – not the US – functioned as the key ally to the Jewish state. Charles de Gaulle duplicated the British treachery. In 1939 PM Chamberlain’s London passed the 2nd White Paper which sealed the borders of the League of Nations Palestine Mandate to Jews seeking to flee from the Nazi barbarians. FDR supported the British White Paper betrayal of the League of Nation Balfour Declaration Palestine Mandate of 1922 when the US closed its borders as well to all European Jews seeking refuge from the Nazi barbarians. Neither Churchill nor FDR consented to bomb the rail lines leading to the Death Camps, despite this Nazi abomination clearly known and exposed by 1942.

        President Truman, to his great credit, the first country to recognize the independent Jewish state in 1948. Eight years following Israeli Independence England and France engaged a military alliance with Tel Aviv and Ben Gurion. England and France sought to seize the Suez Canal away from Nasser after the Egyptian President nationalized the Suez Canal as a means to pay off the huge expense required to build the Aswan Dam/Nasser Lake.

        England and France mutually faced the collapse of their respective empires. Both Algeria and Vietnam demanded their National Independence and freedom from their French aristocratic feudal over-lords. The loss of the crown of the British empire – India & Pakistan directly threatened the First World Great Power status of England post WWII. Hence both London and France consoled the collapse of their respective world empires by dreaming of stealing the Suez Canal away from Nasser’s Egypt.

        Incompetent France and England both failed to seize the Suez Canal, despite tiny Israel’s success at capturing the whole of the Sinai desert from the Egyptian Army. What a disgrace! President IKE compounded this 2nd tier status of both England and France in the Middle East by insisting that Israel return the captured Sinai and England and France peddle their papers elsewhere. Israel obeyed the command of President IKE – the post WWII Super-Power of the Planet Earth.

        The USSR successfully competed with the dominance of the US when it acquired nuclear capabilities in August 1949. Both President IKE and Secretary Stalin directly rejected the notion that England and France could seize the Suez Canal. Such a radical action would have dramatically changed the balance of power in the Middle East, wherein England and France would sit as equals to the US and USSR. President IKE forcibly declared: “HELL NO!”

        The French turn to betray Israel came just prior to the outbreak of the June War of 1967. President Nasser swore that in this war the Arabs would complete the Nazi Shoah and throw the Jews into the Sea. Tel Aviv took Nasser serious and ordered the digging of mass graves. The June War of ’67 turned out to become the 2nd Israeli War of Independence! Charles De Gaulle like PM Chamberlain before him betrayed the French alliance with Israel, by declaring French neutrality just prior to the outbreak of hostilities. London and Paris gambled that Nassers’ horse would win the Derby Race. Ooops.

        During the June War President LBJ – tied down in Vietnam. LBJ too broke faith with President IKE just like he might have involvement with the Kennedy assassination! President IKE demanded that Israel return the Sinai back to Egypt in return for both Stalin and himself slapping London and Paris as second rate powers in the Middle East. LBJ permitted England and France to become the chief authors of UN Security Council Chapter VI Resolution 242. A UN Chapter VII Resolution resulted in the Korean War. UN 242, despite being merely a Chapter VI “suggestion” has evolved unto a “Pie in the Sky” ONLY two-state solution dictate! This Resolution constitutes revisionist history which pretends that Israel lost the June 1967 War; that Israel merely illegally occupies Samaria and Gaza! This UN propaganda stinks as bad as the UN joining Hamas in the Oct7th 2023 pogrom invasion of Israel; and the ICC declaration which assumes that Israeli leaders bear the Shoah guilt of genocide!

        LBJ elevated England and France back to a first tier status in determining the balance of power in the Middle East by allowing the European disgraceful lie that pretends that Arabs did not lose the June 1967 War. That England and France as first tier Great Powers have the right to dictate to Israel the terms of UN peace, known collectively as UN Resolution 242. Where does the USS Liberty fit into this equation of betrayal?

        Prior to the June 1967 War the US in no shape manner or form qualified as a major ally of the Jewish state. Post the ’67 War with the coward betrayal by De Gaul, only then did the US become the key major power ally of the Jewish state. The USS Liberty served the purpose as a spy ship. It had acquired key information of Israeli strategic tank formations positioned within the Sinai desert. It attempted to communicate these critical Israeli tank formations using a code that the Mossad knew that the Soviets had broken and deciphered. Israel could ill afford to permit the Egyptians to gain this critical information. Therefore the IDF bombed the USS Liberty spy shit into submission.

      950. Peace a noun, while shalom a verb. The verb requires trust. No trust No Shalom. The noun simply a nice name and nothing more. Hence political rhetoric employs continuously the Pie in the Sky bull shit of “Peace”.

        Learning out to discern like from like defines “understanding. Another example:

        Distinguishing between Mercy from Pity

        johncoyote·john-coyote.com

        Have mercy.
        Have mercy Pretty girl, she told me. Chameleons faces we do have. We have become strangers to our self, forgot who we were. Once we were whiskey drinking people, who ….
        ___________________________
        ___________________________

        John mercy not the same as pity. Mercy the 4th tohor middah of the Oral Torah revelation at Horev which the church categorically denies. Torah law, something which the NT writers systematically refused to define. Torah law a legal judicial common law jurisprudence and determination of government rule – known as “Legislative Review”. Wherein the Sanhedrin common law courts not only can declare a law passed by the Legislative or Executive Branches as unconstitutional. Legislative Review takes Judicial government one step further. The Great Sanhedrin court re-writes the questioned constitutionality of a law passed by Congress or the Executive and thereafter re-introduces this court re-written law. This process known as “Mishna Torah”.

        The 4th middah of the Oral Torah stands separate and distinct from pity. Torah common law stands upon precedents. Torah commandments qualify as legal precedent in this common law legal system. Three precedent by which a person can interpret the middah of Mercy: 1. The commandment to slaughter all inhabitants of Canaan Man, Woman, and child. 2. The commandment to make eternal war against Amalek. 3. The commandment to kill the stubborn and rebellious child.

        The Torah oath brit alliance – actively entails blessing and curse polarities. If actions have their consequences like the ripple effect of a stone thrown into a pond, then these 3 negative commandments listed above they prevent a Torah curse to curse the people of Israel. No pity shown not to the people of Canaan, nor to Amalek, nor to the child who qualifies as a rebellious son. Herein distinguishes the tohor middah of Mercy from the notion of taking pity upon someone or something.

      953. Why don’t you ever enter into intelligent debate? Are you incapable?
        If you think it is reasonable for Israel to attack, starve and bomb people (women and children) just because they might have supported Hamas then make your case. I think it’s genocide!

      954. Impossible to have an intelligent debate with a person with his head so far up his own ASS. War has its own sets of logic. The Allies applied these exact same set of rules upon the Central Alliance during WWI and the Nazi and Japanese alliance during WWII. As did likewise the other side. Go FUCK YOURSELF.

      955. Impossible to have an intelligent debate with someone who supports genocide, practices racism and supports Nazis. Particularly when every other word is a swear word and they try to justify present war crimes with past war crimes.

      956. Moron who appointed you Judge Jury and Prosecution?! No one but your bloat pig Ego self. Fuck YOU and the ASS Nazi projectionism which you ride on. The Torah speaks of Bil’am and his talking Ass HaHaHaHa.

      959. Doesn’t take much of a judge or jury to see genocide! It’s there in the starving babies, the massacred and tortured!

      969. You idiot – you constantly try to justify genocide by the vile actions of others!! All equally vile!!
        The Nazis at the moment are Israelis – https://www.bing.com/images/search?q=images%20gaza%20destruction&form=IQFRBA&id=B1496F3B1F15AA6583849F7631A617664D1A0C31&first=1&disoverlay=1
        https://www.bing.com/search?q=images+starving+palestinians&form=ANNTH1&refig=696eed2d57db46c59d0c07220e00e195&pc=U531
        The reality that Israeli media is hiding from you – GENOCIDE!!

      978. Guilty. Generations upon generations of Jews enduring pogroms from vile Nancy dogs like yourself screaming Christ Killers.

      988. You stupid pile of shit.

        The aftermath of World War II, particularly the defeat of Nazi Germany, had profound and lasting effects on subsequent generations. Many countries in Europe underwent significant political transformations, leading to the establishment of democratic governments in places that had been under totalitarian regimes. The division of Europe into Eastern and Western blocs created a geopolitical landscape that influenced global politics for decades.

        The war and its aftermath led to changes in societal norms, including movements for civil rights and decolonization. The experiences of war, loss, and displacement affected the mental health and social dynamics of those who lived through it and their descendants. The Marshall Plan and other initiatives aimed to rebuild war-torn Europe, leading to economic recovery and growth. The war altered trade patterns and economic relationships, contributing to the rise of the United States and the Soviet Union as superpowers.

        The thesis “How Do You Choose To Live?” by Hazel Straub emphasizes the idea that while we cannot control external events—both positive and negative—we do have the power to choose our responses to those events. This choice in how we react can significantly influence our overall experience and well-being. Utter and total nonsense. Post WWII generations react to the realities imposed by the Nazi defeat in WWII.

      990. Now to vile reactionary stupid son of a bitch. Coward, here’s a history of Jews in Arab lands prior to the Independence of the Jewish state in 1948.

      992. Fuck you. That your parents raped you as a child and used you as a central piece of their whore house, impacts your life making you the stupid son of a bitch you are today. Just as Clinton’s fucked up relationship with Epstein.

      995. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTJURY INSTRUCTION: THE PEOPLE v. OBAMA, CLINTON, BIDEN

        Indictment: Treachery Against the Republic

        I. TO THE JURY WHO STANDS BETWEEN CIVILIZATION AND COLLAPSE

        You did not arrive here to listen.
        You stand to judge, strike, condemn, and defend the nation’s breath.
        The accused did not misstep.
        They plotted, manipulated, shoved the Republic to its knees, and rammed a legal dagger between its ribs.
        They shredded oath.
        They gutted law.
        They muzzled voters and spit in the face of the Constitution.
        You do not cradle justice gently.
        You slam it like an axe through rotten wood.

        II. COUNT ONE: CONSPIRACY TO SHATTER THE UNITED STATES

        Barack Obama hatched, Hillary Clinton injected, and Joe Biden peddled a nationwide scheme to cripple Donald Trump, paralyze the presidency, and kidnap the federal apparatus.
        They fabricated evidence, dangled lies like bait, and jammed fraudulent reports into courtrooms like crowbars.
        They unleashed the CIA, twisted the FBI into a political blade, and forced innocent men through false investigations.
        They nailed disinformation to public walls, then danced on truth’s corpse.
        This crew didn’t govern.
        They hijacked, blackmailed, and torched public trust for a seat at the throne.

        III. COUNT TWO: OBSTRUCTION THROUGH SABOTAGE

        Joe Biden’s lawyers didn’t defend legality.
        They drowned it.
        They buried evidence, not beneath procedure, but under intentional rot.
        They strangled laptops, froze investigations, and scraped every thread of accountability from the federal map.
        They choked whistleblowers, chased down dissenters, and set fire to transparency.
        They didn’t delay justice—they gutted it with garden shears and fed the scraps to political dogs.

        IV. COUNT THREE: ELECTION INTERFERENCE BY JUDICIAL ASSAULT

        They didn’t trust the ballot box, so they ambushed it.
        They smeared Trump with indictments, pinned courtrooms to his chest like explosives, and rushed trial after trial like a firing squad with gavels.
        They pressured secretaries of state, erased his name from ballots, and dragged him through lawfare swamps during election season.
        They flooded headlines with venom, lobbed charges to generate chaos, and faked neutrality with the dead eyes of bureaucratic wolves.
        This wasn’t politics.
        This reeked of coup.

        V. COUNT FOUR: IMPOSTER PRESIDENCY

        Joe Biden didn’t lead—his handlers propped him like a scarecrow, then whispered policy through his dentures.
        They fed him pills, rigged teleprompters, and marionetted his limbs through briefings.
        They hollowed the executive branch, trapped it in dementia, and plastered the facade with “normalcy” while reality burned.
        They cloaked regime control in elder abuse, then pushed the corpse forward like a battering ram of plausible deniability.
        This wasn’t governance.
        This stitched Frankenstein from election fraud and cognitive decline, then forced Americans to salute it.

        VI. COUNT FIVE: DOMESTIC INSURRECTION DISGUISED AS DEMOCRACY

        This cabal did not defend democracy—they smashed its skull on the marble floor of the Capitol, then wore its skin like a costume.
        They commandeered intelligence agencies, converted watchdogs into lapdogs, and launched war against half the country.
        They recruited news anchors as propaganda mouthpieces, muzzled dissent, and rigged every lever of federal power to silence Trump.
        They slashed the throat of separation of powers, crucified truth, and pissed on the ashes of constitutional restraint.
        These weren’t mishaps.
        These exploded from deliberate, cold-blooded betrayal.

        VII. THE VERDICT NOW BELONGS TO YOU

        You don’t weigh feelings.
        You grind facts like bone under molars.
        You don’t interpret law like scholars.
        You swing it like a mace against corruption.
        If you believe the accused:
        Strangled elections,
        Rigged courts,
        Sabotaged justice,
        Hijacked power by deceit and cognitive puppetry,
        Then you must deliver the only verdict that protects this Union from permanent decay:
        GUILTY
        On every count
        Without remorse
        Without delay

        CLOSING

        History does not whisper here.
        It screams.
        Speak your verdict with the roar of the republic reclaiming its spine.

      996. If you believe that MAGA twaddle you’ll believe anything. Trump is caught in the Epstein trap. He’s a paedophile high up on Epstein’s list. He fucks children. He’s wriggling like an eel. That’s what I believe is behind this preposterous smokescreen.

      1018. Carlo M. Cipoila, 1976 “The Basic Laws of Human Stupidity”. First Law of Stupidity: Always and inevitably, everyone underestimates the number of stupid individuals in circulation.
        Second Law of Stupidity: The probability that a certain person is stupid is independent of any other characteristic of that person.
        Third Law of Stupidity: A stupid person is one who causes losses to another person or group while deriving no gain for themselves and even possibly incurring losses.
        Fourth Law of Stupidity: Non-stupid people always underestimate the damaging power of stupid individuals.
        Fifth Law of Stupidity: A stupid person is the most dangerous type of person.

        Dietrich Bonhoeffer did not specifically formulate a “theory of stupidity” in the same way that Carlo M. Cipolla did. However, Bonhoeffer’s writings and thoughts on ethics, responsibility, and the nature of evil can be interpreted to address the concept of human folly and moral failure. While Bonhoeffer did not explicitly label his thoughts as a “theory of stupidity,” his insights into human behavior, moral failure, and the dangers of complacency resonate with the themes of irrationality and folly found in discussions about human stupidity. His life and writings serve as a powerful reminder of the need for critical thinking, ethical engagement, and the courage to confront evil in all its forms.

      1025. In the 1920s and 30s Orthodox Jews vocally opposed Balfour/League of Nations efforts to achieve Jewish self-determination in the Middle East. The curse of the Shoah followed.

        J-Wirehttp://www.jwire.com.auRabbis reject Israeli army service, arrests for draft refusal likely in SeptemberThe Israeli Defence Forces completed the distribution of 54,000 first-order draft summonses to Orthodox men, the army said on Wednesday night, signalling the start …
        ____________________________________
        ____________________________________

        By their fruits you shall know them. Its called the Shoah – the systematic extermination of 75% of Western European Jewry in less than 3 years. Carlo M. Cipoila, 1976 “The Basic Laws of Human Stupidity”.

        First Law of Stupidity: Always and inevitably, everyone underestimates the number of stupid individuals in circulation.
        Second Law of Stupidity: The probability that a certain person is stupid is independent of any other characteristic of that person.
        Third Law of Stupidity: A stupid person is one who causes losses to another person or group while deriving no gain for themselves and even possibly incurring losses.
        Fourth Law of Stupidity: Non-stupid people always underestimate the damaging power of stupid individuals.
        Fifth Law of Stupidity: A stupid person is the most dangerous type of person.

        Dietrich Bonhoeffer did not specifically formulate a “theory of stupidity” in the same way that Carlo M. Cipolla did. However, Bonhoeffer’s writings and thoughts on ethics, responsibility, and the nature of evil can be interpreted to address the concept of human folly and moral failure.

        While Bonhoeffer did not explicitly label his thoughts as a “theory of stupidity,” his insights into human behavior, moral failure, and the dangers of complacency resonate with the themes of irrationality and folly found in discussions about human stupidity. His life and writings serve as a powerful reminder of the need for critical thinking, ethical engagement, and the courage to confront evil in all its forms.

      1026. Its extremely important to publish opposition within the GOP, (screw the DemonCrapic Party and the MSM propaganda press) concerning our President Trump’s well deserved and rejoiced 2nd Administration. Personally, for me, I emotionally support President Trump. Non-the-less, its extremely important to publish GOP and even democratic party opposition.

        Tulsi Gabbard has ‘exaggerated’ and ‘imagined evidence’: John Bolton | On Balance
        Personally Bolten expresses hostility toward President Trump. His ignorance revealed during the 12 Day War against Iran. Honestly, I do not respect John Bolton’s criticism.
        John Bolton says Donald Trump can’t come up with ‘coherent’ view on Israel | LBC

        Jason Crow of Colorado, a Democrat Congressman, has voiced opposition to Tulsi Gabbards Russia-Gate Hoax charges.
        Colorado’s Jason Crow comments on being selected to be impeachment manager

        Senator Mark Warner, despises Tulsi Gabbard. Approve and support the service made by Edward Snowden, and support his pardon. The threat of the Ukraine joining NATO caused Russia to invade Ukraine. Russia twice invaded by Napoleon and Hitler through the flat plains of the Ukraine.
        Sh*t That Ain’t True – Mark Warner on Tulsi Gabbard

        The Russian Hoax allegations and the Epstein sex scandal – indeed separate issues, each with its own context and implications. The Russian Hoax allegations primarily revolve around the integrity of the electoral process and potential foreign interference, while the Epstein scandal deals with serious criminal behavior related to sexual exploitation.

        Investigations into the Russian allegations were led by the Mueller Report, which sought to determine the extent of Russian interference and any collusion with the Trump campaign. The Epstein scandal has led to multiple investigations and legal actions against those involved in his network, focusing on accountability for sexual abuse.

        Mark Kelly, a Democratic Senator from Arizona, attempts to equate the Russia-Gate Hoax with the Epstein files. Kelly opposed Gabbard from the get-go.
        Sen. Mark Kelly Raises Red Flags on Tulsi Gabbard’s Nomination: National Security Concerns

        On July 2019 Jeffrey Epstein was arrested on federal charges of sex trafficking minors. His arrest and subsequent “suicide” caused an ongoing scrutiny of the Trump Administration’s ties to Epstein, though not directly linked to Russia-Gate. The Trump Administration faced no direct legal pressure related to Epstein until after the Russia-Gate allegations began to unfold! Therefore Mark Kelly employs the Epstein files as a red herring to deflect away from the Watergate Hoax scandal and the ultimate disgrace of the Obama Administration.

        This Red Herring tactic of linking various scandals, a common denominator employed in political rhetoric, aimed at reactionary uneducated television views. Where these Democrapic opponents of President Trump seek to shift their skewed narratives, in order to focus public attention away from embarrassing political disgraces – such as the Russia-Gate Hoax Scandal.

        Jim Himes, another Democrat calls the Russia Hoax accusations – “baseless”. Its important to remember the CNN Fake News reporting 8 years ago.

        Jake Tapper: Trump’s world untethered to facts
        Jake Tapper, his new book, “Original Sin: President Biden’s Decline, Its Cover-Up, and His Disastrous Choice to Run Again,” co-authored with Alex Thompson. The book explores the alleged concealment of President Biden’s cognitive decline by his inner circle and the implications of this for his 2024 re-election campaign. Tapper argues that Biden’s aides and family members were aware of his declining health but chose to support his decision to run for re-election, despite concerns about how this would affect his campaign and the Democratic Party.

        CNN has made several programming adjustments, including moving Tapper’s show to a later time and removing other anchors from their positions, but Tapper remains a prominent figure at the network. Jake Tapper remains with CNN and continues to host his show, despite the network’s recent programming which demoted the importance of his shows.

        CNN ratings have never recovered from its rabid hostility and biased news coverage of the first Trump Administration. The MSM socialist Pravda-like propaganda, lead by NBC, CBS, ABC and CNN Fake News, has witnessed a serious decline in earnings and influence.

        The Fake News MSM legacy media promotes to this day a Yellow Journalism that prioritizes copy selling sensationalism over hard copy objective journalism. The expulsion of President Trump from Twitter prior to the 2020 elections inspired Elon Musk to acquire X and fire the vast majority of Twitter parasite slugs. The concealing of the Hunter Biden laptop scandal by the FBI and the MSM press significantly influenced the 2020 Presidential elections.

        The FBI’s involvement in the investigation of the laptop raised concerns about the intersection of law enforcement and political narratives, with critics arguing that it contributed to a lack of accountability in media reporting. Many individuals express frustration with what they perceive as a lack of integrity in journalism, leading to calls for more accountability and a return to objective reporting standards.

      1028. The complexity of the current Obama Trump political struggle forced me to amplify my original critique? Did Obama order the two assassination attempts on Trump?

        Its extremely important to publish opposition within the GOP, (screw the DemonCrapic Party and the MSM propaganda press) concerning our President Trump’s well deserved and rejoiced 2nd Administration. Personally, for me, I emotionally support President Trump. Non-the-less, its extremely important to publish GOP and even democratic party opposition.

        Tulsi Gabbard has ‘exaggerated’ and ‘imagined evidence’: John Bolton | On Balance

        Bolten personally expresses opinions hostile toward President Trump. His ignorance revealed during the 12 Day War against Iran. Honestly, I do not respect John Bolton’s criticism.
        John Bolton says Donald Trump can’t come up with ‘coherent’ view on Israel | LBC

        Jason Crow of Colorado, a Democrat Congressman, has voiced opposition to Tulsi Gabbards Russia-Gate Hoax charges.
        Colorado’s Jason Crow comments on being selected to be impeachment manager

        Senator Mark Warner, despises Tulsi Gabbard. Approve and support the service made by Edward Snowden, and support his pardon. The threat of the Ukraine joining NATO caused Russia to invade Ukraine. Russia twice invaded by Napoleon and Hitler through the flat plains of the Ukraine.
        Sh*t That Ain’t True – Mark Warner on Tulsi Gabbard

        The Russian Hoax allegations and the Epstein sex scandal – indeed separate issues, each with its own context and implications. The Russian Hoax allegations primarily revolve around the integrity of the electoral process and potential foreign interference, while the Epstein scandal deals with serious criminal behavior related to sexual exploitation.

        Investigations into the Russian allegations were led by the Mueller Report, which sought to determine the extent of Russian interference and any collusion with the Trump campaign. The Epstein scandal has led to multiple investigations and legal actions against those involved in his network, focusing on accountability for sexual abuse.

        Mark Kelly, a Democratic Senator from Arizona, attempts to equate the Russia-Gate Hoax with the Epstein files. Kelly opposed Gabbard from the get-go.
        Sen. Mark Kelly Raises Red Flags on Tulsi Gabbard’s Nomination: National Security Concerns

        On July 2019 Jeffrey Epstein was arrested on federal charges of sex trafficking minors. His arrest and subsequent “suicide” caused an ongoing scrutiny of the Trump Administration’s ties to Epstein, though not directly linked to Russia-Gate.

        The Trump Administration faced no direct legal pressure related to Epstein until after the Russia-Gate allegations began to unfold! Therefore Mark Kelly employs the Epstein files as a red herring to deflect away from the Watergate Hoax scandal and the ultimate disgrace of the Obama Administration.

        This Red Herring tactic of linking various scandals, a common denominator employed in political rhetoric, aimed at reactionary uneducated television views. Where these Democrapic opponents of President Trump seek to shift their skewed narratives, in order to focus public attention away from embarrassing political disgraces – such as the Russia-Gate Hoax Scandal.

        Jim Himes, another Democrat calls the Russia Hoax accusations – “baseless”. Its important to remember the CNN Fake News reporting 8 years ago.

        Jake Tapper: Trump’s world untethered to facts
        Jake Tapper, his new book, “Original Sin: President Biden’s Decline, Its Cover-Up, and His Disastrous Choice to Run Again,” co-authored with Alex Thompson.

        That book explores the alleged concealment of President Biden’s cognitive decline by his inner circle and the implications of this for his 2024 re-election campaign. Tapper argues that Biden’s aides and family members were aware of his declining health but chose to support his decision to run for re-election, despite concerns about how this would affect his campaign and the Democratic Party.

        CNN has made several programming adjustments, including moving Tapper’s show to a later time and removing other anchors from their positions, but Tapper remains a prominent figure at the network. Jake Tapper remains with CNN and continues to host his show, despite the network’s recent programming which demoted the importance of his shows.

        CNN ratings have never recovered from its rabid hostility and biased news coverage of the first Trump Administration. The MSM socialist Pravda-like propaganda, lead by NBC, CBS, ABC and CNN Fake News, has witnessed a serious decline in earnings and influence.

        The Fake News MSM legacy media promotes to this day a Yellow Journalism that prioritizes copy selling sensationalism over hard copy objective journalism. The expulsion of President Trump from Twitter prior to the 2020 elections inspired Elon Musk to acquire X and fire the vast majority of Twitter parasite slugs. The concealing of the Hunter Biden laptop scandal by the FBI and the MSM press significantly influenced the 2020 Presidential elections.

        The FBI’s involvement in the investigation of the laptop raised concerns about the intersection of law enforcement and political narratives, with critics arguing that it contributed to a lack of accountability in media reporting. Many individuals express frustration with what they perceive as a lack of integrity in journalism, leading to calls for more accountability and a return to objective reporting standards.

        Did Obama and Hillery use false intelligence, the Steele report, to discredit Trump’s election victory? Did senior officials from the FBI and CIA support the Russia interference false alligations? The Epstein scandal has nothing to do with the Russian hoax of 2016. That’s a Red Herring. What “multiple investigations have confirmed Russian interference in the 2016 election? What information has Gabbard “cherry-picked”?

        The Steele Dossier came from the Clinton’s election team. The Democrats employed the false Steele Dossier to open investigations on the Trump team. No question the Steele dossier served as a Democratic attack point used to challenge the Trump ’16 victory.

        The Mueller Report exonerated Trump. You cannot accuse Gabbard of cherry picking information and not bring any evidence of “cherry picked” evidence. That’s another Red Herring.

        Whether the Kremlin sought to influence the ’16 election has absolutely nothing what so ever to do with the Trump election campaign. Cherry-Picking accusations post the 3 plus years of Russia Hoax do not mean squat. Name the evidence. Put up or shut up.

        Fusion GPS supports the Gabbard allegations made against both Obama and Clinton. The Mueller Report based its investigations upon Fusion GPS lies. How does Gabbard “selectively interpret” evidence. Name the evidence. No evidence exists that the Trump election team worked in collusion with Russia.

        The Steele Dossier corrupt from the start, regardless if various unnamed sources implicated in the Clinton hoax scandal. Russian interference in the ’16 elections a Red Herring. It has nothing to do with the Trump team in ’16. Emphasizing A vs. downplaying or ignoring B absolutely requires naming both A and B.

        Vague declarations of how different parties emphasize or downplay aspects of the investigations absolutely require specifics not broad general statements unsupported by factual evidence. That’s propaganda. The Mueller Report did not establish a conspiracy or coordination between the Trump Team and the Russian Government.

        Candidate Clinton utterly disgraced and humiliated. Documented Russian interference efforts has absolutely nothing to do with the Trump team anymore than with the Clinton team. Russia operates independent of both Trump and Clinton. The accusation the Democrats made against Trump following the ’16 elections – a simple Red Herring.

        The Mueller Report with its conclusions that no evidence of conspiracy or coordination between the Trump campaign and Russia starkly contrasts with the political slander which the MSM press lead by Rachel Maddow and Late Night “comedy” shows. That Russia employed social media and hacking, no different than the US doing the exact same thing against Russia and virtually all other countries across the Planet.

        Both Obama and Clinton sought to make a coup against President Trump’s election victory. US spy agencies sow discord in the political systems of Foreign governments. Especially hostile Foreign governments! Social media directly caused the Arab Spring revolutions which caused the Middle East to go into political anarchy and Civil Wars!

        Because the Mueller Report found no evidence of conspiracy or coordination between the Trump campaign and Russia then the “baseless” declarations made by Obama and his supporters which seeks to minimize the damage to the reputations of these treason traitor criminals – the only thing “baseless”.

        Rachel Maddow and other bought and paid for supporters of Obama and Clinton openly employed slander to politically assassinate the Good Name of President Trump and his election team. The Mueller Report conclusions utterly refutes the ’25 Obama and supporters slander and political assassination attempts.

        Did Obama cross the line and order the two assassination attempts made on Candidate Trump prior to the ’24 elections? Does US intelligence spy on the America people through FaceBook and other social media platforms? Obviously, its an undisputed reality that the FBI and CIA and NSA, post the 9/11 Chaney/Bush Patriot Act have operated outside the bounds established by the US Constitution. Bush himself referred to the Constitution as just a GD piece of paper!

        Obama and his allies engaged in slander to undermine Trump’s legitimacy. The narrative that figures like Rachel Maddow and others have engaged in slander against Trump. These subversive media figures have perpetuated a narrative of collusion without sufficient evidence, contributing to a broader campaign to discredit Trump.

        The revelations by whistleblowers, such as Edward Snowden, highlighted the extent of surveillance programs that collect data from social media and other platforms. This has raised significant debates about privacy rights and government overreach. The quote attributed to George W. Bush regarding the Constitution reflects a sentiment among some critics that national security concerns have been prioritized over civil liberties.

        Obama and his allies engaged in slander to undermine Trump’s legitimacy. Rachel Maddow engaged in slander to undermine Trump’s legitimacy.

        Whistleblowers like Edward Snowden revealed extensive surveillance programs that collect data from social media. The debate over the balance between civil liberties and national security, particularly post-9/11, the Obama-Clinton treason have conclusively without a shred of doubt proven.

        The disgraced legacy media with its False News merits total and absolute contempt. The revelations by Edward Snowden brought to light the extent of government surveillance, raising concerns about privacy rights. The collection of data from social media by the FBI, CIA, NSA etc., demands to restrict and radically curtail these utterly corrupt bureaucracies which have no accountability to the voting American people.

      1031. Words. Words are symbols. You have to have intelligence and knowledge to interpret them. I can see why you would think that.

      1033. Jim Zwinglius Redivivus
        Jim·zwingliusredivivus.wordpress.com

        Remembering Prof. dr. W. van ’t Spijker
        Prof. dr. W. van ’t Spijker died on Friday, July 23, 2021. You can read his obituary here. If you aren’t familiar with him, he was a scholar of the Reformation. And a very, very goo…
        _____________________________________
        _____________________________________

        Theological Complicity in State Violence

        Calvinism and Lutheranism Compared: Prof. Dr. Willem van ‘t Spijker (1926–2021), a leading Dutch Calvinist theologian, made substantial contributions to church history, ecclesiastical law, and the development of Reformed theology. Yet his work conspicuously failed to grapple with one of the most catastrophic consequences of the Protestant Reformation: The Thirty Years’ War (1618–1648).

        At the heart of Reformed theology lies the doctrine of predestination—the belief that God has foreordained all events, including salvation and damnation. This framework fostered a militant providentialism: war was interpreted as a divine tool, victory as confirmation of righteousness, and suffering as sanctification; terror Islam sanctifies its martyrs this very day. Such logic fueled the religious zealotry of Protestant-Catholic conflicts in early modern Europe and sacralized political violence. Calvinist theologians, including van ‘t Spijker, largely failed to confront the theological and moral implications of their tradition’s role in igniting and escalating such brutal barbaric bloodshed.

        This blind spot extended far beyond the Reformation. A similar theological detachment reemerged during the Nazi era, when much of Protestant Europe—especially the Lutheran Church in Germany—collapsed morally in the face of totalitarianism and genocide. The result was catastrophic: 75% of Western European Jewry and 63% of European and Russian Jews were annihilated. Churches failed to resist—and in many cases collaborated with—Nazism, cloaking their cowardice or complicity in theological rationalizations of “obedience” and “providence.”

        Van ‘t Spijker’s silence on these historical-theological intersections utterly emblematic of a much broader failure within Reformed scholarship: the inability to reckon with how doctrinal systems, when left unchallenged, enable state violence. Without such critical introspection, the Reformed tradition risks perpetuating a theology disconnected from its own ethical consequences.

        Both Calvinist and Lutheran systems share foundational errors that—when unchecked—open the door to theological barbarism. In Calvinist thought, God’s sovereign will is absolute; every event, from salvation to catastrophe, is predetermined. During the Thirty Years’ War, this led to a dangerous fusion of theology and politics: military victory was seen as a sign of divine favor, while political violence became a “righteous” necessity. Calvinist churches, despite their strong synodal structures, proved unable—or unwilling—to restrain theological alliances with princely power. This alignment justified widespread bloodshed, famine, and forced displacement as sacred duty.

        Martin Luther’s “Two Kingdoms” doctrine separated the spiritual and political realms, teaching that secular rulers are divinely appointed and must not be resisted. By the 20th century, this was transformed into an ideological bludgeon by the German Christian movement, which fused Lutheranism with Nazism. Clergy upheld obedience even as the state descended into genocide. Though the Barmen Declaration (1934), led by Karl Barth, attempted to resist this theological capitulation, the Confessing Church remained a marginalized minority. The institutional Lutheran Church stood largely silent—or worse, supportive—as the Nazis murdered millions, including the overwhelming majority of European Jewry.

        Calvinism, with its emphasis on God’s glory and man’s depravity, lacked a theology of inherent human dignity. Jews, Catholics, and heretics were viewed as reprobates—predestined for damnation, beyond grace, justice, or mercy. This theological posture helped normalize righteous violence against those outside the “elect.”

        Lutheran theology was even more explicit. Luther’s own antisemitic writings—On the Jews and Their Lies (1543)—called for synagogue burnings and expulsion. These ideas laid the groundwork for Christian racial antisemitism. The Nazi vision of the Jew drew directly from centuries of Lutheran contempt and theological supersessionism: the idea that Christianity had replaced Israel as God’s chosen; where Jesus as the son of God replace the oath brit sworn to Avraham, Yitzak, and Yaacov that they would father the chosen Cohen people.

        Therefore, in both cases, the churches failed to resist tyranny not only because of fear—but because their theological systems lacked a mechanism to challenge it from within. In the end, the failure of both Reformed traditions was not merely a failure of courage—but a failure of theological architecture. Their systems lacked internal mechanisms—legal, moral, or interpretive—to challenge tyranny from within. When state violence aligned itself with religious rhetoric, these traditions were intellectually disarmed.

        Whereas Jewish tradition sustains a culture of legal argumentation, known as משנה תורה/Legislative Review; grounded in the courtroom common law which stands upon prior judical precedent courtroom rulings. European courts lack the power to overrule the State. A critical flaw that NT theology, in all its many forms or formats, has totally failed to address. Neither Christianity nor Islam has the cultural tradition of judicial “prophets”.

        Both “daughter religions” define prophesy as – foretelling the future. The Torah views this interpretation as Av tuma witchcraft. According to the Torah prophets command mussar. How does mussar define prophesy? Mussar applies equally across the board to all generations of the chosen Cohen people. Only the chosen Cohen people received and accepted the Torah revelation at Sinai and Horev.

        Both Christian and Muslim theological creed belief systems emphatically embrace a theology of Monotheism. Alas monotheism violates the 2nd Sinai commandment. Only Israel accepted the Torah at Sinai. Therefore the God of the chosen Cohen people a local tribal God and not a Universal God as Christian and Islamic theology dictates to its believers.

        In the end, the failure of both Reformed and Lutheran traditions was not merely a lack of courage, but a failure of theological design. These systems lacked the internal instruments—legal, prophetic, interpretive—needed to resist tyranny when it arose cloaked in religious language.

      1038. The false messiah Obozo–Santa Claus — is going to stand trial. Its Obozo and Clinton’s turn to take a police mug shot and sit inside a courtroom accused of treason. The question: did Obozo, Clinton, Pelosi, Schiff and other democraps attempt to make a coup following the 2016 elections

        Perhaps the greatest political scandal in all American history …

        It’s CHECKMATE: Trump’s Brilliant Move Just ENDED the Deep State’s Game! – YouTube
        Tulsi Gabbard Exposes the Russia Hoax | Victor Davis Hanson
        Tulsi Gabbard Speaks On Russia Hoax From The White House – YouTube

      1057. Marco Rubio Sanctions ICC Judges After They Target U.S. and Israel in Explosive Rulings

        In a sweeping move, Senator Marco Rubio announced sanctions against four International Criminal Court justices.
        ________________________________________
        ________________________________________

        Marco Rubio’s sanctions on ICC judges—in response to politically driven rulings targeting the U.S. and Israel—represent the first serious American pushback against the expanding overreach of international legal institutions. But these sanctions merely scratch the surface. If Israel were to bomb the International Criminal Court in The Hague for the crime of judicial overreach, it would unleash a shockwave through the foundations of the post-WWII European imperial legal order.

        Such an act would shatter the illusion that the Rome Statute and its court represent binding global authority. In truth, the ICC is a political weapon wielded disproportionately against Western democracies and their allies, while shielding rogue regimes. Its authority rests on consensus, not enforcement. The Rome Treaty would be exposed as not worth the paper it’s written on.

        Europe forfeited its moral right to judge the Jewish people the moment it orchestrated the Shoah. Any European claim to universal justice—especially when applied selectively against the Jewish state—is hypocrisy cloaked in humanitarianism. The ICC’s rulings against Israel are not about war crimes; they are ritual acts of expiation for Europe’s own genocidal guilt. But that guilt is not Israel’s burden to carry. To bomb the ICC would be to formally reject Europe’s post-Nazi pretensions to legal supremacy and declare: “You have no right to judge us.”

        Bombing the ICC would have the same historical effect as the 1956 Suez Crisis: the end of European claims to independent geopolitical authority. Just as France and the UK’s failed bid to reclaim the Suez Canal revealed their imperial impotence, an Israeli destruction of the ICC would reveal the EU’s inability to project legal-moral power beyond its own borders.

        What the EU has is not law, but a narrative infrastructure—paper treaties, postmodern guilt, and international NGOs wielding legal language as a substitute for lost religious and imperial confidence.

        A targeted Israeli strike on the ICC would not trigger war. It would trigger disbelief, followed by narrative collapse, and finally a global reckoning with Western legal hypocrisy. The EU would be faced with the question: do we escalate to save face—or submit to an Israeli dictate which radically limits the EU authority in the balance of power in the Middle East and in Europe.

        If Israel bombed the Court of the Hague for the crime of judicial over-reach. This would set a precedent that the establishment of the ICC through the Rome Treaty – not worth the paper the Rome Treaty written upon. Widespread EU condemnations Big Deal. England and France have already broken off diplomatic relations with Israel.

        The Trump Government in Washington most likely would support Israel if Israel bombed the Court of the Hague for judicial over-reach. The Rome Treaty established Court would most likely dissolve. It would most definitely challenge the judicial jurisdiction of a European Court over Israel!

        Post Shoah Europe lost its rights to judge Jews. The destruction of the Pie in the Sky Rome Treaty would establish a major political precedent that European imperialism stops at the borders of the EU member states alone.

        The assertion that bombing the ICC in The Hague would lead to a collapse of the EU’s prestige is a strong viewpoint that reflects significant concerns about the authority and effectiveness of international institutions.

        If a member state or a country with significant geopolitical influence, like Israel, were to attack an international institution such as the ICC, it could be perceived as a direct challenge to the authority of not only the ICC but also the broader framework of international law that the EU supports.

        In short: bombing the Court of the Hague would radically change the balance of power in Europe. For the first time since the Muslim invasion of Western Europe a major disruption of European political autonomy would result.

        The EU would either put up or shut up: either they would declare War against Israel or not. The Nato alliance, if the US backed Israel would unquestionably collapse. The EU’s credibility as a defender of international law would cease to exist – gone like a puff of smoke. Israel would have called the bluff of the EU, like as if bombing the ICC compares to a hand of stud poker! This could lead to a more fragmented international order, challenging the EU’s role as a global actor.

        An attack on the ICC could set a precedent that undermines the enforcement of international law, leading to a situation where states feel empowered to act unilaterally without regard for international institutions.

        The incident could complicate diplomatic relations not only between Israel and the EU but also between other countries and international organizations. It could lead to a reevaluation of how states engage with international legal frameworks.

        The UN itself would most likely collapse like as did the League of Nations. If nothing else, the historical relationship between Europe and Israel, particularly in the context of the Shoah and post-war UN attempt to compare Israel to the European Nazi crimes against humanity, adds layers of complexity to this European projectionism of its own Nazi guilt and the moral bankruptcy of both Western and Eastern Roman church moral authority over European civilizations.

        The implications of such an act would resonate deeply within the historical narrative of European-Jewish relations and radically shift the narrative reversing the role of Jews as dominant and the church as dhimmi slaves – utterly rejected and despised.

        The entire European security architecture is underwritten by the United States, both financially and militarily. Without U.S. backing, NATO becomes functionally hollow. France and the UK retain nuclear capability, but their conventional power is insufficient to act independently against a U.S.-aligned state like Israel.

        No EU state would risk confrontation with the U.S., their most vital ally, over a non-NATO event like an Israeli action against the ICC. EU states are deeply post-military in culture. Their battlefield is law, narrative, and diplomacy—not armed force.

        Even in the face of Russian invasion (Ukraine), EU states have limited direct engagement, preferring economic sanctions, legal resolutions, and humanitarian aid. Against Israel, the EU’s instinct would be: denounce, sanction, isolate—not mobilize or fight.

        Much of EU condemnation of Israel is a projection of its own unresolved guilt over colonialism and the Holocaust. This moral outrage stops at the threshold of real cost. That’s why you see relentless UN resolutions, ICC motions, and media warfare—but not realpolitik confrontation. Israel calling their bluff—if the U.S. holds firm—exposes their impotence. If Israel bombed the ICC in the Hague – No War. No boots. No tanks. NO Article 5 Nato involvement. The collapse of Nato as an alliance.

        Symbolic institutions (like the ICC) to claim moral authority—but has no spine when force or geopolitical will counters that narrative. If Israel, backed by a U.S. administration, were to shatter a legal myth like the ICC’s authority … No war, but rather most likely the total collapse of EU imperialist Post WWII illusion of legal hegemony on par with England and France failure to capture and seize the Suez canal in the 1956 War. It would clearly reset the terms of European involvement in global legal power.

      1060. Nu Opher dumb ass come out and play. Cat got your tongue. You have no shame, even after your repeated slanders and lies exposed publicly. Sucks being you.

      1065. Marco Rubio Sanctions ICC Judges After They Target U.S. and Israel in Explosive Rulings

        In a sweeping move, Senator Marco Rubio announced sanctions against four International Criminal Court justices.
        ________________________________________
        ________________________________________

        Marco Rubio’s sanctions on ICC judges—in response to politically driven rulings targeting the U.S. and Israel—represent the first serious American pushback against the expanding overreach of international legal institutions. But these sanctions merely scratch the surface. If Israel were to bomb the International Criminal Court in The Hague for the crime of judicial overreach, it would unleash a shockwave through the foundations of the post-WWII European imperial legal order.

        Such an act would shatter the illusion that the Rome Statute and its court represent binding global authority. In truth, the ICC is a political weapon wielded disproportionately against Western democracies and their allies, while shielding rogue regimes. Its authority rests on consensus, not enforcement. The Rome Treaty would be exposed as not worth the paper it’s written on.

        Europe forfeited its moral right to judge the Jewish people the moment it orchestrated the Shoah. Any European claim to universal justice—especially when applied selectively against the Jewish state—is hypocrisy cloaked in humanitarianism. The ICC’s rulings against Israel are not about war crimes; they are ritual acts of expiation for Europe’s own genocidal guilt. But that guilt is not Israel’s burden to carry. To bomb the ICC would be to formally reject Europe’s post-Nazi pretensions to legal supremacy and declare: “You have no right to judge us.”

        Bombing the ICC would have the same historical effect as the 1956 Suez Crisis: the end of European claims to independent geopolitical authority. Just as France and the UK’s failed bid to reclaim the Suez Canal revealed their imperial impotence, an Israeli destruction of the ICC would reveal the EU’s inability to project legal-moral power beyond its own borders.

        What the EU has is not law, but a narrative infrastructure—paper treaties, postmodern guilt, and international NGOs wielding legal language as a substitute for lost religious and imperial confidence.

        A targeted Israeli strike on the ICC would not trigger war. It would trigger disbelief, followed by narrative collapse, and finally a global reckoning with Western legal hypocrisy. The EU would be faced with the question: do we escalate to save face—or submit to an Israeli dictate which radically limits the EU authority in the balance of power in the Middle East and in Europe.

        If Israel bombed the Court of the Hague for the crime of judicial over-reach. This would set a precedent that the establishment of the ICC through the Rome Treaty – not worth the paper the Rome Treaty written upon. Widespread EU condemnations Big Deal. England and France have already broken off diplomatic relations with Israel.

        The Trump Government in Washington most likely would support Israel if Israel bombed the Court of the Hague for judicial over-reach. The Rome Treaty established Court would most likely dissolve. It would most definitely challenge the judicial jurisdiction of a European Court over Israel!

        Post Shoah Europe lost its rights to judge Jews. The destruction of the Pie in the Sky Rome Treaty would establish a major political precedent that European imperialism stops at the borders of the EU member states alone.

        The assertion that bombing the ICC in The Hague would lead to a collapse of the EU’s prestige is a strong viewpoint that reflects significant concerns about the authority and effectiveness of international institutions.

        If a member state or a country with significant geopolitical influence, like Israel, were to attack an international institution such as the ICC, it could be perceived as a direct challenge to the authority of not only the ICC but also the broader framework of international law that the EU supports.

        In short: bombing the Court of the Hague would radically change the balance of power in Europe. For the first time since the Muslim invasion of Western Europe a major disruption of European political autonomy would result.

        The EU would either put up or shut up: either they would declare War against Israel or not. The Nato alliance, if the US backed Israel would unquestionably collapse. The EU’s credibility as a defender of international law would cease to exist – gone like a puff of smoke. Israel would have called the bluff of the EU, like as if bombing the ICC compares to a hand of stud poker! This could lead to a more fragmented international order, challenging the EU’s role as a global actor.

        An attack on the ICC could set a precedent that undermines the enforcement of international law, leading to a situation where states feel empowered to act unilaterally without regard for international institutions.

        The incident could complicate diplomatic relations not only between Israel and the EU but also between other countries and international organizations. It could lead to a reevaluation of how states engage with international legal frameworks.

        The UN itself would most likely collapse like as did the League of Nations. If nothing else, the historical relationship between Europe and Israel, particularly in the context of the Shoah and post-war UN attempt to compare Israel to the European Nazi crimes against humanity, adds layers of complexity to this European projectionism of its own Nazi guilt and the moral bankruptcy of both Western and Eastern Roman church moral authority over European civilizations.

        The implications of such an act would resonate deeply within the historical narrative of European-Jewish relations and radically shift the narrative reversing the role of Jews as dominant and the church as dhimmi slaves – utterly rejected and despised.

        The entire European security architecture is underwritten by the United States, both financially and militarily. Without U.S. backing, NATO becomes functionally hollow. France and the UK retain nuclear capability, but their conventional power is insufficient to act independently against a U.S.-aligned state like Israel.

        No EU state would risk confrontation with the U.S., their most vital ally, over a non-NATO event like an Israeli action against the ICC. EU states are deeply post-military in culture. Their battlefield is law, narrative, and diplomacy—not armed force.

        Even in the face of Russian invasion (Ukraine), EU states have limited direct engagement, preferring economic sanctions, legal resolutions, and humanitarian aid. Against Israel, the EU’s instinct would be: denounce, sanction, isolate—not mobilize or fight.

        Much of EU condemnation of Israel is a projection of its own unresolved guilt over colonialism and the Holocaust. This moral outrage stops at the threshold of real cost. That’s why you see relentless UN resolutions, ICC motions, and media warfare—but not realpolitik confrontation. Israel calling their bluff—if the U.S. holds firm—exposes their impotence. If Israel bombed the ICC in the Hague – No War. No boots. No tanks. NO Article 5 Nato involvement. The collapse of Nato as an alliance.

        Symbolic institutions (like the ICC) to claim moral authority—but has no spine when force or geopolitical will counters that narrative. If Israel, backed by a U.S. administration, were to shatter a legal myth like the ICC’s authority … No war, but rather most likely the total collapse of EU imperialist Post WWII illusion of legal hegemony on par with England and France failure to capture and seize the Suez canal in the 1956 War. It would clearly reset the terms of European involvement in global legal power.

      1069. Idiot you never learn. You’re like a dog who continually returns and eats its own vomit. You think that simply making a general declaration of “depth, evidence and truth” makes it so? Fool.

      1070. Genocide you silly stinking piece of shit dumb ass:

        Before the Holocaust (pre-WWII), there were approximately 9.5 million Jews living in Europe.

        By the end of the Holocaust, about 6 million Jews had been murdered by the Nazis and their collaborators.

        That constitutes roughly 63–75% depending on how one defines “European Jewry” (e.g., including Soviet territories, or not).

      1075. Coward yellow bellied pig

        The number of Afghan civilians killed during the U.S.-British-led invasion of Afghanistan, which began in October 2001, has been a subject of extensive research and debate. Early estimates suggested that thousands of civilians were killed in the initial bombing campaigns and subsequent ground operations. Reports indicated that between 1,000 to 3,000 civilians may have died in the first few months of the invasion. As of 2021, this project estimated that approximately 47,000 Afghan civilians had died as a result of the conflict, including direct violence and indirect causes such as displacement and lack of access to healthcare.

        UNAMA has documented civilian casualties annually, reporting thousands of civilian deaths each year due to conflict-related violence, including airstrikes, ground engagements, and suicide attacks. U.S. and NATO airstrikes, particularly in populated areas, have been a significant source of civilian casualties. Ground operations often led to collateral damage. The prolonged nature of the conflict, with various factions fighting for control, contributed to a high number of civilian deaths over the years. While estimates vary, it is widely acknowledged that tens of thousands of Afghan civilians have lost their lives as a result of the U.S.-British-led invasion and the subsequent conflict in Afghanistan. The impact on civilian populations has been profound, leading to ongoing humanitarian challenges in the region.

      1076. Your complete and utter ignorance of European history, go back to school moron.

        John Calvin and Martin Luther, pivotal figures in the Protestant Reformation, each contributing significantly to the movement in distinct ways. Martin Luther (1483-1546), best known for his “95 Theses,” which he famously nailed to the door of the Wittenberg Castle Church in 1517. This document criticized the Catholic Church’s practices, particularly the sale of indulgences, and called for reform.

        His theology emphasized the doctrine of justification by faith alone, arguing that salvation is a gift from God and cannot be earned through good works or church rituals. Asserting that salvation is a gift from God, this theology day and night different from Torah common law as expressed through T’NaCH prophetic mussar common law and Talmudic halachic judicial common law. This prioritization of faith as the pursuit of judicial justice – fair compensation of damages inflicted by Jews upon other Jews, radically different from the theologies spewed forth by the Protestant Reformation.

        Luther made an utterly sophomoric translation the Bible into German, which utterly failed and even compounded the Vulgate perversion of the T’NaCH. Luther’s translation became “The Word” for the ignorant Lutheran laity. He promoted the idea that individuals could interpret scripture without knowledge of Hebrew or Aramaic and despised the Roman clergy who relied upon Latin and Greek. Luther’s ideas established Lutheranism, and challenged the authority of the Pope and the Catholic Church, leading to the formation of various Protestant denominations.

        John Calvin (1509-1564), Calvin built upon Luther’s ideas but introduced a more systematic theology. His work, “Institutes of the Christian Religion,” laid out his beliefs about predestination, the sovereignty of God, and the nature of the church. He established Geneva as a center of Protestantism, implementing a theocratic government that enforced moral discipline and promoted education and social welfare. Calvin’s teachings led to the development of Reformed theology, influencing various Protestant groups, including the Presbyterians and the Huguenots. He stressed the importance of a disciplined Christian community and the role of the church in guiding believers’ lives.

        The St. Bartholomew’s Day Massacre in 1572; the Huguenots were French Protestants influenced by John Calvin’s teachings. Tensions between the Catholic majority and the Protestant minority led to a series of civil wars known as the French Wars of Religion. The St. Bartholomew’s Day Massacre was a turning point, where thousands of Huguenots were killed in Paris and across France, marking a significant moment of barbaric religious violence. This period was characterized by political intrigue, shifting alliances, and brutal conflicts, ultimately leading to the Edict of Nantes in 1598, which granted limited religious freedoms to the Huguenots. However, this tolerance was revoked in 1685, leading to further persecution and the exodus of many Huguenots from France.

        The immediate trigger for the Thirty Years’ War came in 1618 with the Defenestration of Prague, where Protestant nobles in Bohemia revolted against the Catholic Habsburg rule. This event marked the beginning of the war, but the underlying tensions had been building since the formation of the Catholic League and Protestant Union. The events of 1609, particularly the formation of the Catholic League under Maximilian of Bavaria, were crucial in setting the stage for the Thirty Years’ War. The conflict would evolve into a complex struggle involving various European powers, driven by both religious and political motivations, leading to widespread devastation across the continent.

        The Protestant Union, established in 1608, was indeed led by Frederick IV, the Elector Palatine, and aimed to protect the rights and interests of Protestant states against Catholic encroachments. This was a response to the increasing tensions and conflicts arising from the Reformation and the subsequent political landscape in Europe.

        In reaction to the Protestant Union, the Catholic League was formed in 1609, primarily to counter the influence of Protestant states and to protect Catholic interests. This military alliance included several Catholic states and was a significant factor in the lead-up to the Thirty Years’ War, which began in 1618. These alliances were crucial in shaping the religious and political dynamics of the time, leading to significant conflicts and changes in power within the Holy Roman Empire and beyond.

        The Peace of Westphalia in 1648, which ended the Thirty Years’ War, was primarily focused on resolving the conflicts arising from that war rather than directly addressing the earlier events of the St. Bartholomew’s Day Massacre. The Peace of Westphalia consisted of a series of treaties that concluded the Thirty Years’ War (1618-1648) and the Eighty Years’ War (1568-1648) between Spain and the Dutch Republic. It marked a significant turning point in European history, establishing a new order based on state sovereignty.

        The Peace of Westphalia and the ensuing treaties recognized the coexistence of Catholicism, Lutheranism, and Calvinism within the Holy Roman Empire. This was a crucial step towards religious tolerance, as it aimed to stabilize the region by allowing various Christian denominations to coexist. The treaties recognized the coexistence of Catholicism, Lutheranism, and Calvinism within the Holy Roman Empire. France gained territories in Alsace and parts of Lorraine, while Sweden gained influence in northern Germany.

        While the Peace of Westphalia did not directly address the St. Bartholomew’s Day Massacre, it did contribute to a broader context of religious tolerance and the recognition of Protestant rights in Europe. The massacre had already highlighted the violent tensions between Catholics and Protestants in France, leading to a long period of civil strife. The St. Bartholomew’s Day Massacre (1572) deepened the divide between Catholics and Protestants in France, leading to further civil wars and conflicts. It exemplified the extreme violence and intolerance that characterized the period.

        In the same year as the ‘Peace of Westphalia’ (1648), witnessed the barbaric explosion of the Khmelnytsky Uprising, also known as the Cossack-Polish War. Bohdan Khmelnytsky was the leader (1648-57) of the Zaporozhian Cossacks who organized a rebellion against Polish rule in Ukraine that ultimately led to the transfer of the Ukrainian lands east of the Dnieper River from Polish to Russian control. His barbarian Cossack hordes slaughtered perhaps 1 million Jews living in the Ukraine and Poland.

        Germany annexed Prussia from Poland during the partitions of Poland, which occurred in three stages. (1772) – Prussia gained the region of West Prussia, which included parts of Polish territory. (1793) – Prussia acquired additional territories, including parts of Greater Poland. (1795) – Prussia annexed the remaining parts of Poland, including areas that would later be known as Prussian Poland.

        After World War II, the Allies did not restore Poland to its pre-partition borders; instead, they established new borders based on the outcomes of the war and the decisions made at conferences among the Allied powers. Poland lost significant territory in the east to the Soviet Union, including areas such as Lviv (Lwów) and parts of what is now western Ukraine and Belarus. In compensation, Poland was granted territory in the west, including parts of former German territories such as Silesia, Pomerania, and the southern part of East Prussia. Poland was re-established as a sovereign state after the war, but its borders were significantly different from those before the partitions in the late 18th century.

      1078. The Vulgate and Lutheran Bible translations so disgusting – eat shit and die – “translations”. What a pathetic joke. Werewolves, Vampires, and Frankenstein … follow with the cowardly lion, down the Yellow Brick Road – Oh my!

        John Calvin and Martin Luther, pivotal figures in the Protestant Reformation, each contributing significantly to the movement in distinct ways. Martin Luther (1483-1546), best known for his “95 Theses,” which he famously nailed to the door of the Wittenberg Castle Church in 1517. This document criticized the Catholic Church’s practices, particularly the sale of indulgences, and called for reform.

        His theology emphasized the doctrine of justification by faith alone, arguing that salvation is a gift from God and cannot be earned through good works or church rituals. Asserting that salvation is a gift from God, this theology day and night different from Torah common law as expressed through T’NaCH prophetic mussar common law and Talmudic halachic judicial common law. This prioritization of faith as the pursuit of judicial justice – fair compensation of damages inflicted by Jews upon other Jews, radically different from the theologies spewed forth by the Protestant Reformation.

        Luther made an utterly sophomoric translation the Bible into German, which utterly failed and even compounded the Vulgate perversion of the T’NaCH. Luther’s translation became “The Word” for the ignorant Lutheran laity. He promoted the idea that individuals could interpret scripture without knowledge of Hebrew or Aramaic and despised the Roman clergy who relied upon Latin and Greek. Luther’s ideas established Lutheranism, and challenged the authority of the Pope and the Catholic Church, leading to the formation of various Protestant denominations.

        John Calvin (1509-1564), Calvin built upon Luther’s ideas but introduced a more systematic theology. His work, “Institutes of the Christian Religion,” laid out his beliefs about predestination, the sovereignty of God, and the nature of the church. He established Geneva as a center of Protestantism, implementing a theocratic government that enforced moral discipline and promoted education and social welfare. Calvin’s teachings led to the development of Reformed theology, influencing various Protestant groups, including the Presbyterians and the Huguenots. He stressed the importance of a disciplined Christian community and the role of the church in guiding believers’ lives.

        The St. Bartholomew’s Day Massacre in 1572; the Huguenots were French Protestants influenced by John Calvin’s teachings. Tensions between the Catholic majority and the Protestant minority led to a series of civil wars known as the French Wars of Religion. The St. Bartholomew’s Day Massacre was a turning point, where thousands of Huguenots were killed in Paris and across France, marking a significant moment of barbaric religious violence. This period was characterized by political intrigue, shifting alliances, and brutal conflicts, ultimately leading to the Edict of Nantes in 1598, which granted limited religious freedoms to the Huguenots. However, this tolerance was revoked in 1685, leading to further persecution and the exodus of many Huguenots from France.

        The immediate trigger for the Thirty Years’ War came in 1618 with the Defenestration of Prague, where Protestant nobles in Bohemia revolted against the Catholic Habsburg rule. This event marked the beginning of the war, but the underlying tensions had been building since the formation of the Catholic League and Protestant Union. The events of 1609, particularly the formation of the Catholic League under Maximilian of Bavaria, were crucial in setting the stage for the Thirty Years’ War. The conflict would evolve into a complex struggle involving various European powers, driven by both religious and political motivations, leading to widespread devastation across the continent.

        The Protestant Union, established in 1608, was indeed led by Frederick IV, the Elector Palatine, and aimed to protect the rights and interests of Protestant states against Catholic encroachments. This was a response to the increasing tensions and conflicts arising from the Reformation and the subsequent political landscape in Europe.

        In reaction to the Protestant Union, the Catholic League was formed in 1609, primarily to counter the influence of Protestant states and to protect Catholic interests. This military alliance included several Catholic states and was a significant factor in the lead-up to the Thirty Years’ War, which began in 1618. These alliances were crucial in shaping the religious and political dynamics of the time, leading to significant conflicts and changes in power within the Holy Roman Empire and beyond.

        The Peace of Westphalia in 1648, which ended the Thirty Years’ War, was primarily focused on resolving the conflicts arising from that war rather than directly addressing the earlier events of the St. Bartholomew’s Day Massacre. The Peace of Westphalia consisted of a series of treaties that concluded the Thirty Years’ War (1618-1648) and the Eighty Years’ War (1568-1648) between Spain and the Dutch Republic. It marked a significant turning point in European history, establishing a new order based on state sovereignty.

        The Peace of Westphalia and the ensuing treaties recognized the coexistence of Catholicism, Lutheranism, and Calvinism within the Holy Roman Empire. This was a crucial step towards religious tolerance, as it aimed to stabilize the region by allowing various Christian denominations to coexist. The treaties recognized the coexistence of Catholicism, Lutheranism, and Calvinism within the Holy Roman Empire. France gained territories in Alsace and parts of Lorraine, while Sweden gained influence in northern Germany.

        While the Peace of Westphalia did not directly address the St. Bartholomew’s Day Massacre, it did contribute to a broader context of religious tolerance and the recognition of Protestant rights in Europe. The massacre had already highlighted the violent tensions between Catholics and Protestants in France, leading to a long period of civil strife. The St. Bartholomew’s Day Massacre (1572) deepened the divide between Catholics and Protestants in France, leading to further civil wars and conflicts. It exemplified the extreme violence and intolerance that characterized the period.

        In the same year as the ‘Peace of Westphalia’ (1648), witnessed the barbaric explosion of the Khmelnytsky Uprising, also known as the Cossack-Polish War. Bohdan Khmelnytsky was the leader (1648-57) of the Zaporozhian Cossacks who organized a rebellion against Polish rule in Ukraine that ultimately led to the transfer of the Ukrainian lands east of the Dnieper River from Polish to Russian control. His barbarian Cossack hordes slaughtered perhaps 1 million Jews living in the Ukraine and Poland.

        Germany annexed Prussia from Poland during the partitions of Poland, which occurred in three stages. (1772) – Prussia gained the region of West Prussia, which included parts of Polish territory. (1793) – Prussia acquired additional territories, including parts of Greater Poland. (1795) – Prussia annexed the remaining parts of Poland, including areas that would later be known as Prussian Poland.

        After World War II, the Allies did not restore Poland to its pre-partition borders; instead, they established new borders based on the outcomes of the war and the decisions made at conferences among the Allied powers. Poland lost significant territory in the east to the Soviet Union, including areas such as Lviv (Lwów) and parts of what is now western Ukraine and Belarus. In compensation, Poland was granted territory in the west, including parts of former German territories such as Silesia, Pomerania, and the southern part of East Prussia. Poland was re-established as a sovereign state after the war, but its borders were significantly different from those before the partitions in the late 18th century.

      1079. Goyim love to promote their Palestine revisionist history.

        johncoyote·john-coyote.com·

        Dead ends… A You Tube song sung by a beautiful Woman.

        Dead ends A Poem by Coyote Poetry  Time for all of us to think and do the right things. Before it is too late for us and nature.  Please don’t allow Israel/ USA to erase a people ( Palestine.). Murder of cities and people. The greatest sin. Men can do.                  Dead ends.. Brothers told no-one […]

        https://www.youtube.com/embed/IqQvDER-jyk?list=RDIqQvDER-jyk&version=3&rel=1&showsearch=0&showinfo=1&iv_load_policy=1&fs=1&hl=en&autohide=2&wmode=transparent&autoplay=1

        Palestine ceased to exist as a UN protectorate territory when Israel won its National Independence by Nakba defeating 5 Arab Armies invaded the newly declared Jewish state of Israel.

        This pie in the sky song of revisionist history ignores that all Arab countries Universally rejected UN 181. Do you even know what that Resolution was about? Arab rejected the Balfour Declaration by which the League of Nations carved up the defunct and defeated Ottoman Greater Syrian empire and awarded mandates to France in Syria and Lebanon and to Britain in present day Israel, Jordan, Iraq and Kuwait. The latter known as the “Palestine Mandate”. Palestine not an Arab word, Arabs cannot even pronounce the letter P in their language!

        Arabs reject Jewish self determination in the Middle East. Just that simple. No Arab ever would embrace the name Palestinian during the entire period of the British Mandate. Only in 1964 did the Egyptian born Yasser Arafat embrace the name Palestine with the establishment of his PLO terrorist organization. The Palestine Charter of Arafat’s PLO did not condemn the Jordanian rule over Samaria which it rebranded as “West Bank”. Nor did it denounce the Egyptian rule over Gaza! It openly condemned ’48 Israel.

        You want to make the Palestinian issue into a religious belief system, that’s your choice. But this revisionist history compares to the Xtian and Muslim basic theologies of Monotheism. Which God do they worship? Such classic pie in the sky fairy tales of some Universal God… what a load of shit. On par with the lies which Goyim parents spew out to their young children about Santa Claus.

        In similar vein Arab propaganda promotes the travesty of Israeli settlements in Samaria and Gaza today! America formed its original 13 colonies to the vast land from Sea to Shining Sea, built through settlements…American settlements perhaps the greatest success story in the last 250 years!

      1080. So when the Jews were kicked out of Palestine thousands of years ago they ceased to exist? Israel ceased to exist?

      1081. [[[ Also, when you speak of the erasure of Jewish self-determination through revisionist Palestinian narratives, I hear both an intellectual rebuttal and a deep historical wound. Is your critique aimed primarily at the political manipulation of language and borders—or also at the erasure of Jewish covenantal memory from the land itself? ]]]

        Unlike the Xtian and Muslims theologies which promote some pie in the sky Universal Monotheism God, the revelation of the Torah at Sinai revealed the local tribal God of Israel. When David fled from king Shaul he declared as he entered g’lut lands: “I have been forced to abandon God”. Just as the Great and Small Sanhedrin courts only have jurisdiction within the borders of the Jewish state so too the local God of Israel. Herein the answer given to the Holocaust survivor who said to me: “I was in Auschwitz, Where was God?” When I lived in the US and Xtian people asked me if I was a religious Jew? I responded with: I am an atheist praise God. But even living within the borders of the oath sworn brit alliance lands I habitually respond to Goyim with “I am an atheist – praise God”. Meaning, I do not believe in any theological/creed construct Word-gods – praise God. LOL Torah, its deep and requires a sense of humor.

        The curse of g’lut-exile of my people almost immediately caused Jews to lose the wisdom how to do mitzvot לשמה. G’lut Jewry does not understand how to employ and work our Yatrir HaTov within our hearts. The בנין אב-precedent of blowing the shofer serves as a פרט to define the כלל of Yatzir HaTov. Meaning, to blow a shofar requires air from the lungs. But to blow a spirit from the Yatzir HaTov within the heart requires the k’vanna, (all time-oriented commandments require k’vanna) the dedication of defined tohor middot spirits. This כללי-general idea of tohor middot, it defines the dedication of the middah of חנון.

        Herein a definition of 3 of the 13 tohor middot which a person dedicates through Yatzir Tov k’vannot from within their hearts. Jews uprooted from our homelands by both the Babylonians and Romans caused the g’lut cursed survivors to lose this kabbalah wisdom which defines how to do mitzvot לשמה.

  3. Replying to Opher, not Mosckerr:
    I could write you a thesis on this to help your understanding, but I won’t.
    Judaism is by far the worst at the moment!!! Not all Jews (and probably not the best Jews, in my opinion) – clearly – but the ones who believe they can murder, rape and steal because of what it says in an old book. And carry on and on and on; to wipe out an indigenous population in order to steal their land.
    As you know, Opher, I respect a lot of what you say, but I find your analysis here, superficial. Every religion you list has a wide variety of interpretations and sects (except for Quakerism, which is a Christisn sect, not a religion – although they do admit non-religious members).
    The Islam you condemn is not the Islam practised by most Muslims I know. Just like most religions, much of IsIam has ‘modernised’. You say they ban music and art. Sufis use music and dance in devotion, and have, for a very long time. Did you know that Richard Thompson is a Sufi? What is banned in art is only the depiction of the human form. Some of the most beautiful works of art in the world have been created by Muslims. Have you never visited the Taj Mahal or the Alhambra? The horrible destruction of works of art by ISIS was based on the fact that those pieces either depicted the human form, or were pre-Islamic. Far from all Muslim women cover their faces or hair. It is only required in the strictest cultures.
    The same applies to the modernisation of Hinduism, although it has always had a wide variety of interpretations.
    Buddhism, also, has a variety of sects, again, with different rules.
    There are Christian sects, now, doing horrible things – and that doesn’t just apply to Catholic priests.
    Most of the basic tenets of all religions are morally ‘good’. It is the way people have twisted them in the pursuit of power that has corrupted them.
    As to the ‘why’ of religion, that is a different question altogether, and best saved for another occasion.

    Reply

    1. Oh yes – I certainly have given a superficial generalisation. There are many sects and varieties. What I tend to focus on are the fundamentalists and my experiences of travelling around the world.
      We have watched the Sufis dance and loved the music.
      We have indeed marvelled at the wondrous architecture and artwork in Mosques, Temples and Cathedrals.
      I do have to acknowledge the support and comfort that religious communities provide.
      That was not the focus of my piece.
      I rail against the violence and hatred, the intolerance and misogyny. I have visited Israel and many Islamic countries. Both demonstrate levels of misogyny. In Oman there was not a woman to be seen. In other Islamic countries the men were all cool in their lightweight T-shirts while the women sweltered in ridiculous robes. I despise the way women are treated in all three Abrahamic religions – particularly Muslims.
      I watch with horror as the extreme right-wing evangelicals push their misogynistic agendas. I was on a site where there was a great deal of exchange of views. They opposed women working or being educated, were against all birth control and saw women as subservient chattels, there to provide for men and produce babies. Repulsive.
      I’ve travelled through India and seen the desecration of temples by Muslims (destroying any art/statues depicting human form) and destruction of other sites. In Israel I was engaged in a discussion about the rights of Jews to oust Palestinians – all based on some outdated, tribal Old Testament bullshit.
      Religion, for me, is the source of most of the world’s problems. We don’ need the int6olerance, misogyny and violence. I don’t need to base my life on some hypothetical afterlife or follow rituals, dress codes, food restrictions and the like for some non-existent god.

      Reply

    2. Genocide, a profane taboo word, commonly raped pillaged and burned among people who abhor the Israeli response to the Oct 7th 2023 massacre. Genocide in this context, amounts to Holocaust denial. A word meant to prevent another Shoah has been weaponized to accuse Jews of committing the very crime inflicted upon them.

      Genocide — a word forged in the ashes of the Shoah — has become a profane taboo, violated, cheapened, and weaponized by those who abhor Israel’s response to the Oct. 7th 2023 massacre. In this context, the accusation is not merely false; it amounts to Holocaust denial. A term meant to prevent another genocide is now hurled against the Jewish state in a grotesque inversion of history: the victims accused of the crime that nearly annihilated them.

      This version of the Xtian Church infamous blood libel. Manufactured and disseminated by the UN, EU bureaucrats, Moscow, Beijing, and the media conglomerates that sell “genocide headlines” the way pornography sells clicks. Genocide sells. Justice does not. And so, the word violently and brutally raped and pillaged for political theatre rather than applied with legal integrity. Genocide occurs when those in power worship power itself, not justice. But no one dares question the motives of the institutions promoting this Blood Libel slander. Why? Because the same leaders, together with their institutions, have grown dependent on the “Jewish problem” narrative to justify their own existence.

      Never once has anyone questioned the agenda of an organization that promotes this “Blood Libel Slander” made against Israel. Israel did not sign the Rome Agreement which established the International Court of the Hague. In point of fact, NEVER AGAIN, as PM Begin expressly communicated to Jimmy Carter at Camp David, means that Israelis post the European “Final Solution” will ever again permit, specifically European Goyim States, to dictate their “SOLUTION” to “THE JEWISH PROPLEM”. Israel rejects the idea that: (1) Jews exist again a ward of Europe. (2) Jewish sovereignty pre-conditional to UN approval. (3) Jewish self-defense is subject to foreign veto. Thus, the ICC’s attempted jurisdiction is a political fiction—an extension of the pre-1948 mindset that Jews do not have independent standing among nations. The ICC’s claim of jurisdiction over Israel: a fiction built on an older fiction. This accusation of “genocide” guilt imposed by Press decree upon Israel, simply the old paternalism in a new legal wrapper of classic South African Apartheid racism.

      The accusation of “genocide” against Israel after Oct. 7, a form of modernized Holocaust denial — a mutation of the classic European blood libel — and the UN’s usage of the term reveals a long-standing imperial contempt for Jewish sovereignty. The UN never had moral universality. It functioned from birth as a colonial power-balancing instrument, and its treatment of Israel, merely the most concentrated exposure of its original design flaws. Where medieval Xtendom accused Jews of murdering Xtian children, the modern UN-Leftist coalition accuses Jews of murdering Palestinian children.

      The replacement theology converts the UN as the new Ersatz-Xtianity. The idea of a secularized form of Xtianity that rejects the theological trappings of the Gospel narrative, but retains dogmatic moral and ethical frameworks associated with Papal Rome. This concept often manifests in political contexts, where political ideologies adopt seemingly Xtian ethical principles, like for an example: a just war, without engaging theological ‘Good News’ yet promoting the new religion of democracy.

      The UN originally set up to prevent another Shoah. Clearly the UN has failed its mandate and MUST disband. What does the UN have to do with the Xtian “Genocide” in Nigeria? Or Pol Pot, or Idi[ot] Amin? The UN promotes platitudes rather than pursues justice. The UN today totally not recognizable to the UN of 1948. Pursuit of power and political coalitions of State international alliances has completely uprooted the founding Charter. The UN systematically ignores or minimizes actual genocide, mass slaughter, and mass enslavement when politically inconvenient. The UN protects authoritarian regimes with bloc voting. The Human Rights Council institutionalizes political scapegoating. UN Bloc voting by authoritarian states has turned this pie in the sky replacement of Wilson’s post WWI League of Nations into a political marketplace where justice get bought and sold on the illegal white women, and child-slave trade-markets.

      Franklin D. Roosevelt U.S. President; championed the idea of a global peace organization. Eleanor Roosevelt, Chairperson of the UN Commission on Human Rights; pivotal in drafting the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Winston Churchill – British Prime Minister; advocated for collective security and cooperation. Joseph Stalin – Soviet Dictator primarily responsible for the Allied victory over the Nazis; boycotted the UN Chapter VII dictate to North Korea. Charles de Gaulle – not included at the Yalta Conference, French Resistance leader; crucial in representing defeated France’s interests post-WWII wherein France sat as a Permanent Member in the UN Security Council. De Gaulle as a statesman, succeeded in asserting France’s interests in the aftermath of World War II. Harry S. Truman, U.S. President after FDR; supported the formation and principles of the UN which negated the Constitutional Right of Congress to Declare War.

      The Yalta Conference, held in February 1945, was a pivotal meeting between Franklin D. Roosevelt, Winston Churchill, and Joseph Stalin to discuss the post-war reorganization of Europe and the establishment of international cooperation through the United Nations. Their responses varied significantly, reflecting their distinct national interests and ideologies. Stalin showed a positive attitude towards Roosevelt’s proposal for a new international organization aimed at maintaining peace. He recognized the need for a framework to manage post-war tensions and prevent conflicts. These men who built the UN, represent colonial empires, racial hierarchies, colonial interests, and military blocs.

      Stalin insisted that the new organization must include mechanisms that recognized the Soviet Union’s status as a major power. He wanted assurances that Soviet interests and security concerns, particularly in Eastern Europe, would be addressed. While agreeing to the formation of the United Nations, Stalin was adamant about establishing Soviet influence in Eastern Europe, emphasizing a security buffer to protect the Soviet Union from future aggression. Clearly the Democratic Party leadership attempt to increase the NATO alliance to include these same Eastern European countries into the NATO alliance, specifically the Ukraine, no UN Resolution has ever condemned.

      Churchill was more cautious regarding Stalin’s intentions. He was supportive of the idea of a United Nations but harbored concerns about Soviet expansionism and the balance of power in Europe. Churchill advocated for a United Nations that emphasized democratic principles and human rights. He urged for a system that would prevent the imposition of totalitarian regimes, especially in nations liberated from Nazi occupation. Yet the UN promotes Arab dictatorships, specifically Palestinian Arab dictatorships, precisely following the Oct 7th 2023 massacre of Israelis. Churchill wrote the first White Paper, this man focused his interests over British domination upon any new balance of power political arrangement.

      Stalin’s enthusiasm for the concept of the United Nations demonstrated a strategic acknowledgment of the necessity for international governance. This was essential for managing tensions after the war. His insistence on recognizing the Soviet Union’s status as a major power was non-negotiable. The establishment of a security buffer in Eastern Europe was paramount for him, as it aligned with the Soviet doctrine of protecting its borders from perceived threats. Stalin’s strategy foreshadowed the post-war division of Europe. His desire for influence in Eastern Europe laid the groundwork for future Cold War dynamics, where conflicting ideologies and interests between the USSR and Western nations would lead to tension.

      Mali announced the expulsion of French troops, effectively ending an French economic or military domination. In similar fashion the governments of Burkina Faso, Niger, Chad, Senegal, & Côte d’Ivoire. The UN never once condemned French neocolonialism. The rise of alternative global partnerships, particularly with nations like China and Russia, has provided Sahelian countries with options to diversify their diplomatic and economic relationships. The UN never condemned Western neocolonial economic structured dominance which favored French interests over African development. Independent Sahelian countries, no thanks to the UN, have started to forge new alliances that prioritize their interests rather than continuing to rely on traditional colonial ties. African sovereignty and control over national resources the UN never recognized.

      Jan Christian Smuts, a prominent South African statesman and military leader, had a contentious and complex relationship with Mahatma Gandhi. While they both played influential roles in early 20th-century India and South Africa, their interactions were often marked by significant ideological differences and personal animosity. Smuts held a more conservative viewpoint, often prioritizing colonial interests and the maintenance of order within the British Empire.

      One major point of contention was the implementation of discriminatory pass laws targeting Indians in South Africa. Gandhi actively opposed these laws through protests, while Smuts supported the laws as a means of maintaining control. During discussions about Indian representation in South African politics, Smuts was seen as obstructive, further fueling Gandhi’s disdain for him.

      Reports suggest that Smuts had a personal dislike for Gandhi, viewing him as a radical undermining British authority in South Africa. This animosity was reflected in their public exchanges and political opposition. Despite their differences, Gandhi’s struggle for Indian rights in South Africa remains a significant historical contribution, overshadowing Smuts’ position at that time. Today, Smuts is often critiqued for his stances, which contributed to systemic discrimination, while Gandhi is celebrated for his non-violent approach to achieving social justice. The relationship between Jan Christian Smuts and Mahatma Gandhi exemplifies the broader tensions of colonial politics, with personal ideologies and ambitions clashing in a critical period of history. Their interactions serve as a lens through which the complexities of resistance against colonial rule can be understood.

      Jawaharlal Nehru, as India’s first Prime Minister played a significant role in the establishment of the United Nations (UN). Nehru was a strong proponent of internationalism and believed in the necessity of a global organization to foster peace and cooperation among nations. His vision was largely influenced by the horrors of World War II and the need to prevent future conflicts. Nehru actively participated in key discussions that shaped the UN’s formation. He was part of the Indian delegation at the San Francisco Conference in 1945, where the UN Charter was drafted.

      His contributions emphasized the importance of decolonization and civil rights. Nehru advocated for the inclusion of human rights in the UN framework. As a leader from a newly independent nation, he championed the cause of oppressed peoples, aiming for a UN that would not only prevent wars but also promote social justice. Nehru’s commitment to the UN and its principles laid a foundation for India’s active participation in UN affairs, which has continued to influence its foreign policy. His advocacy for peace, cooperation, and justice remains a part of India’s global identity today.

      In 1975 the United Nations Human Rights Commission condemned the Augusto Pinochet regime for its widespread human rights violations, including torture and political repression. The resolution called attention to reports of extrajudicial killings, disappearance of political opponents, and the overall lack of civil liberties in Chile under Pinochet’s dictatorship. The Augusto Pinochet regime immediately eclipsed the socialist influence of Hernán Santa Cruz.

      Alger Hiss, a high-ranking official in the U.S. State Department and a key figure in the founding meetings of the United Nations. In 1948, Whittaker Chambers, a former communist and journalist, accused Hiss of being a communist spy and of passing classified documents to the Soviet Union. In 1950, Hiss was tried for perjury and was convicted, serving several years in prison. While Hiss was involved in the establishment of the United Nations, serving as a crucial part of the U.S. delegation at the founding conference in 1945, his legacy became overshadowed by the espionage allegations. Historians often debate the extent of his guilt, with some arguing that he was falsely accused.

      The Weaponization of “Genocide”, the UN has perverted into a political cudgel, detached from its historical meaning. Its use against Israel, framed as a form of Holocaust denial and “blood libel.” Israel’s Sovereignty Post-Holocaust — “Never Again” means Israel will not allow external powers—especially European states—to dictate Jewish survival, our international borders or our Capital City. Israel’s refusal to sign the Rome Statute, presented as a rejection of foreign-imposed “solutions” which presume Israel remains a Protectorate Territory of the UN or post WWII European Courts of international law.

      The UN was created to prevent another Shoah, but instead it promotes platitudes and power politics. Examples: ignoring atrocities in Nigeria, Pol Pot’s Cambodia, Idi Amin’s Uganda, and French neocolonialism in Africa. A UN which continually remains worse than simply silent about its founding premise: preventing unilateral security expansions that could trigger world conflict. A UN which “claims” to defend human rights, built partly by men who defend racially stratified empires.

      Selective Condemnations, the UN condemned Pinochet’s Chile but ignored French neocolonialism in Africa. UN resolutions often reflect political convenience rather than consistent justice. The Smuts vs. Gandhi conflict illistrates how the UN’s silence on neocolonial structures in Africa echoes the impact of Colonial legacies.

      Alger Hiss’s role in founding the UN is overshadowed by espionage accusations, symbolizing the organization’s compromised legacy, matched only by the grossly perverted number of UN condemnations made against Israel. The UN has always had compromised foundations, and those cracks have widened into fissures today.

      The UN never morally coherent. It stands exposed as a truce between competing empires wrapped in universal language. The same Human Rights Commission built by men like Smuts and Santa Cruz now functions as a propaganda bureau for authoritarian regimes. And the same UN founded with Alger Hiss — now shadowed by espionage accusations — continues to operate with layers of clandestine influence.

      The weaponization of “genocide”, an old psychological warfare guilt trip, on par with “He died for you”. It continues the old European narative: The Jew as the world’s chief problem. Where once Jews were accused of poisoning wells, today we are accused of poisoning Gaza. Where once Jews were accused of blood crimes, today we are accused of genocide. A system built on the ashes of the Holocaust now recycles Holocaust denial under the guise of human rights.

      Why Smuts? Why Gandhi? Why Pinochet? Why the Sahel? Why Nehru? These leaders and countries both tyrants and saints influenced the establishment of the UN, its the failed ‘dream vision’ which ignores the eternal conflict conducted between Power vs. Justice. All the prophets of the T’NaCH pitted justice against avoda zara – the Human worship of power as God.

      Israel never signed the Rome Statute. Therefore the ICC has no jurisdiction unless Israel consents which fundamentally profanes the post Shoah sworn oath “NEVER AGAIN”. The ICC’s maneuver relies on the fiction that “Palestine” is a state with standing. British Palestine, established by the League of Nations based upon the Balfour Declaration of 1917 ceased to exist when David Ben Gurion declared Jewish national independence and named the new country Israel in 1948.

      Only in 1964 did Egyptian born Yasser Arafat embrace the name of Palestine as central to his PLO Charter. That charter did not view Jordan’s West Bank or Egypt’s Gaza as occupied territory. It limited the phrase “Occupied Territory” only to ’48 Israel. UN Resolutions 242, 338, 446, 2334 etc all political blood libel frauds. UN Resolution 3379 – Zionism is Racism – rejects the Balfour Declaration which fathered the Palestine Mandate of 1921.

      Reply

  4. Comparing my short piece with the long theological and political arguments of the other people who responded, initially, I felt I must have appeared very uneducated. My extensive study of Theology, at university, actually took place 50 years ago, so I am somewhat rusty. (Since then, my working memory has been filled up with education and psychology, used in my professional life.)
    However, this gives me a perspective I am quite happy with. I don’t see all the arguments around the validity of different religions as particularly relevant to your question, Opher. I still agree with the view of my Professor: John Hick, that each religion is appropriate to a specific time and place. He argued that they were different ‘revelations’ of the same truth. I’m not certain that his premise for believing that is wholly correct. It might well be that different peoples, at different times, arrived at their own conclusions about the nature of life, death our world, and our place in it, without divine intervention. As a wise non-theologian once said: ‘We’re all going to the same place, but we’re on different buses’.
    This leads me to judge religions, not on their history, or any complex theological analysis, but. to quote the author of Matthew’s Gospel, ‘By their fruits you will know them’ (Matthew 7:15-21). I’m not using this because of its Biblical origen, but because, to me, it offers a good, solid scale for judging the merits of a system that purports to bring its adherents closer to a path
    intended to result in ‘the good of man’ (and, maybe; even, the good of the planet).
    Based on this, I hold to the arguments I put forward in my first piece.

    Reply

    1. I like that – ‘By their fruits you shall know them’. In my opinion the fruit of nearly all religion is intolerance, fear, hatred and violence. Some are worse than others. At different times they have all been repugnant (even Buddhism).
      As a atheist I find the concept of a god utterly puerile.

      Reply

  5. Gosh! You are quite emphatic in your views! I’ll ponder before I reply. I’m going away for the weekend and I need to finish packing – sorry.

    Reply

    1. LOL I do tend to be a trifle dogmatic and opinionated – but I am open to discussion and I can assure you that I do weigh up the evidence and have been known to change my views. I look forward to your dissection.

      Reply

  6. Human society not flat, nor a טיפש פשט mythology.

    The zionist experiment of democracy faces some criticism by Jews such as myself who favor restoration of a Torah constitutional Republic which mandates a lateral Sanhedrin common law courts to regulate all laws passed by Jerusalem and the state legislatures of the 12 Tribes. Imposing Judicial Legislative Review upon Sanhedrin common law courtrooms with the Mandated Constitutional power to conduct trials which judge Capital Crimes offenses, and impose 4 different types of death penalties, dependent upon the nature of the Capital crimes committed. And equally vital and important דיוק inference to judging Capital Crimes Cases: To judge the leadership responsible for Federal and State governments; based through evidence of laws bureaucratically imposed by government authority officials — viewed through the lenses of prophetic משנה תורה-Legislative Review.

    The prioritization of lateral common law Sanhedrin courtrooms over institutional machinery of governance, which directly includes government leadership positions within these institutions of government, this essential clause defines, separates, and make unique Jewish political science. Faith: the Torah defines as justice justice pursue; a direct reference to lateral Sanhedrin common law courtrooms having the mandate of ‘Legislative Review’ over all governments – Jerusalem or any tribal/state legislature.

    Democracy or democratic institutions not part of the Jewish cultural traditions. Democratic mob rule, a Greek idea and not a Jewish cultural concept. Leaders “anointed” under the pre-condition that they will faithfully pursue justice as the rule of law. As in all Human endeavors, the humanity of Man, the ideal and the practical realities – a wide gap separates the two. When a leader sufficiently abuses his leadership mandate a prophet, representative of the Sanhedrin Court, impeaches that leader and replaces him with another. The stories in the Book of Judges and Samuel and Kings, which pits, for example: Shaul against David, serve as precedent models which separate Ordered societies from chaotic societies collapsing into a state of anarchy.

    Imposition of some grand Cathedral, Soloman Temple – like institutions comparable the newest Federal Reserve building in the US, the graphic porn of pork graft in government that has no shame – within any given civilization. Institutions compare to people that bow down and worship idols. Buildings of wood and stone do not promise efficient good governance. Public expenditure of taxes to build such grand structures of Egoism, they serve witness to a stratification of aristocratic feudal Lord/peasant economic anarchy; which imposes wealth and justifies ‘might make right’ judicial injustice, oppression, theft, and even taboo incest or murder.

    Contrast the IDF with its direct linkage with power projection through Foreign Policy. Ideally Foreign Policy plays second fiddle to domestic Home Rule. But often the nature of the Humanity of Man, Foreign Policies prioritized over Domestic Policies. This Yatzir Ha’Rah, once more its power seduction dominates the dynamic “ideal vs actual”; this gap separates the vision of governance from the cruel reality – that all men sit and crap on toilets, and it stinks. The Human potential NEVER achieves the Human ideal messiah.

    NT mythology no different than Homer’s Iliad, and Odyssey. Hesiod’s Theogony and Works and Days. Aeschylus’s The Orestia. Sophocles Oedipus Rus. Euripides Medea etc etc these Greek myth stories, they compare to how Xtians worship their silly sophomoric bible translations which depict a messiah savior that rises from the judicial oppression grave and saves all Humanity — despite the Caesar Son of Gods – the personification of Hercules/JeZeus in flesh, blood & History.

    The fly in this ever so sweet ointment, myths do not actually make and determine history. As history does not shape and determine modern life today in any society in all the annuls of Humans living on this Earth. Worshipping history as God the exact same idolatry as worshipping Shlomo’s or Herod’s Temples made of wood and stone. Institutionalized buildings, no matter the cost of their construction does not and never has produced the righteous pursuit of judicial common law justice.

    Reply

      4. why are you incapable of putting forward a coherent argument and intelligently debating. If you can justify the genocide then put forward your case!

      12. In the 1920s and 30s Orthodox Jews vocally opposed Balfour/League of Nations efforts to achieve Jewish self-determination in the Middle East. The curse of the Shoah followed.

        J-Wire

        http://www.jwire.com.au

        Rabbis reject Israeli army service, arrests for draft refusal likely in September

        The Israeli Defence Forces completed the distribution of 54,000 first-order draft summonses to Orthodox men, the army said on Wednesday night, signalling the start …
        ______________________________________________________________________
        ______________________________________________________________________

        By their fruits you shall know them. Its called the Shoah – the systematic extermination of 75% of Western European Jewry in less than 3 years. Carlo M. Cipoila, 1976 “The Basic Laws of Human Stupidity”.

        First Law of Stupidity: Always and inevitably, everyone underestimates the number of stupid individuals in circulation.
        Second Law of Stupidity: The probability that a certain person is stupid is independent of any other characteristic of that person.
        Third Law of Stupidity: A stupid person is one who causes losses to another person or group while deriving no gain for themselves and even possibly incurring losses.
        Fourth Law of Stupidity: Non-stupid people always underestimate the damaging power of stupid individuals.
        Fifth Law of Stupidity: A stupid person is the most dangerous type of person.

        Dietrich Bonhoeffer did not specifically formulate a “theory of stupidity” in the same way that Carlo M. Cipolla did. However, Bonhoeffer’s writings and thoughts on ethics, responsibility, and the nature of evil can be interpreted to address the concept of human folly and moral failure. While Bonhoeffer did not explicitly label his thoughts as a “theory of stupidity,” his insights into human behavior, moral failure, and the dangers of complacency resonate with the themes of irrationality and folly found in discussions about human stupidity. His life and writings serve as a powerful reminder of the need for critical thinking, ethical engagement, and the courage to confront evil in all its forms.

      19. In the 1920s and 30s Orthodox Jews vocally opposed Balfour/League of Nations efforts to achieve Jewish self-determination in the Middle East. The curse of the Shoah followed.

        J-Wire

        http://www.jwire.com.au

        Rabbis reject Israeli army service, arrests for draft refusal likely in September

        The Israeli Defence Forces completed the distribution of 54,000 first-order draft summonses to Orthodox men, the army said on Wednesday night, signalling the start …
        ______________________________________________________________________
        ______________________________________________________________________

        By their fruits you shall know them. Its called the Shoah – the systematic extermination of 75% of Western European Jewry in less than 3 years. Carlo M. Cipoila, 1976 “The Basic Laws of Human Stupidity”.

        First Law of Stupidity: Always and inevitably, everyone underestimates the number of stupid individuals in circulation.
        Second Law of Stupidity: The probability that a certain person is stupid is independent of any other characteristic of that person.
        Third Law of Stupidity: A stupid person is one who causes losses to another person or group while deriving no gain for themselves and even possibly incurring losses.
        Fourth Law of Stupidity: Non-stupid people always underestimate the damaging power of stupid individuals.
        Fifth Law of Stupidity: A stupid person is the most dangerous type of person.

        Dietrich Bonhoeffer did not specifically formulate a “theory of stupidity” in the same way that Carlo M. Cipolla did. However, Bonhoeffer’s writings and thoughts on ethics, responsibility, and the nature of evil can be interpreted to address the concept of human folly and moral failure. While Bonhoeffer did not explicitly label his thoughts as a “theory of stupidity,” his insights into human behavior, moral failure, and the dangers of complacency resonate with the themes of irrationality and folly found in discussions about human stupidity. His life and writings serve as a powerful reminder of the need for critical thinking, ethical engagement, and the courage to confront evil in all its forms.

      20. Most of Ireland is independent. Northern Ireland is a democracy. If they want to unite they can vote to do so.

  8. The difference between Torah as a Constitution of the 12 tribes of the Republic from Torah as the religion of the Jewish people established through the Middle Ages codes of the Mishna Torah and Shulkan Aruch. Classical lashon Chazal has Torah, dat, halacha, derech eretz, minhag—but not “Judaism” in the Protestant sense of private belief and Sunday rituals.

    The medieval “religionization” of Torah—Mishneh Torah, Tur, Shulchan Aruch—does something different. But both Church and Islam have produced the fruits of genocide. Large swaths of their histories – indeed marked by forced conversions, inquisitions, or holy wars justified by pompous claims of universal truth. Xtian Europe under the Nazis, and Islam where the ’48 and ’67 wars — wars of genocide to throw the Jews into the Sea.

    Torah defines the 8th Oral Torah midda — TRUTH — (which the church denies to this day) as “path”. Meaning that each person and/or people have their own true path destiny walk before their Gods. Since only Israel accepts the God of Sinai ipso facto Goyim worship other Gods. The local tribal god of Sinai does not compare to the Universal Monotheistic Gods of either Xtianity or Islam. Since only Israel accepted the Sinai, all non-Jewish God-talk is, by definition, “other Gods;” no where does the Xtian Bible or Muslim Koran once bring the שם השם revealed in the first Sinai commandment. Furthermore the false counterfeit religions fail to distinguish the fundamental concept of faith which discerns between the Divine Names יה, האל, אל, אלהים, אל שדי, איש האלהים from the Shekinah שם השם.

    The Book of בראשית, the Avot called upon these Divine Names because the Torah in the Heavens; whereas at Sinai the revelation of the Torah upon the earth, expressed through the revelation of the שם השם. Thereafter in the Book of D’varim explicitly taught that Torah does not come from heaven. Goyim rejection of the Torah means that for them their God remain in Heaven and not within the Yatzir Ha’Tov within the bnai brit hearts.

    Torah understands truth as path. Xtianity & Islam understand truth as set in stone a monopoly dictate. Truth as “Path” validates that many paths exist that a person him or herself can choose to walk therein. “Path” as a monopoly dictate means that the dominant Xtian or Muslim theology slaughters any and all heretics. The two definitions of “TRUTH” not at all the same. Torah revealed only to the Jewish people. We as a tiny tiny tiny minority of Mankind do not pretend to any psychotic notions of “Universal” anything least of all the local tribal god of Israel.

    Its truly an honor to discuss with you the different “textures of languages”; cotton fiber feels different from wool or linen fibers. The Torah directly forbids mixing linen and wool in clothes. Linen a summer fabric whereas wool a winter fabric. The oversimplification of “Universal Monotheism” an utter abomination of faith. Rambam’s Mishneh Torah a comprehensive code of halacha perversion; its יד\14 arranged not around tribes and land allotments, but around abstract legal categories and mitzvah-topics. His halacha code designed to permit Jews in g’lut to learn and lived religiously obey. The subject becomes the yachid (individual) asking, “What is my chiyuv?” more than a polity asking, “What is our constitutional structure?” The national-constitutional elements subsumed and lost under the religion of Yidishkeit.

    Certain strands of Jewish thought emphasizing particularism—the idea that the Torah originally revealed specifically to Israel alone; which excludes all universal pretensions. That other nations have their own valid paths because they refused to accept the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. For example the false Rambam opinion known as the 7 mitzvot bnai noach (primarily Sanhedrin 56a-60b) which he interpreted as 7 Universal commandments for all Mankind. The Book of D’varim classifies two types of Goyim residing in the oath sworn lands; the gere toshav and the Canaanite NaCree or Samaritan refugees who have no legal rights because they falsely claim themselves to be the “real Jews”; a claim taken up by both Xtian and Muslim replacement theologies.

    Despite Rambam’s bombastic bunk claims, his code does not remotely resemble the revelation of Oral Torah at Horev because his code prioritized alien Aristotle deductive Order & logic over the kabbala of rabbi Akiva’s פרדס inductive Order & logic. The lights of Channuka testify that only פרדס logic explanes the revelation of the Oral Torah at Horev on Yom Kippur 40 days after the sin of the Golden Calf. Meaning the P’rushim catagorically rejected the assimilated Tzedukim/Karaite attempts to convert Jerusalem into a Greek polis and forget Oral Torah inductive logic.

    The Aggadic source in mesechta Sanhedrin which address the subject of 7 mitzvot “bnai noach” strictly and only applies to gere toshav Goyim living within the borders of Judea. The Sanhedrin courts Capital Crimes mandate only applicable to within the borders of Judea when Jews rule the land as an Independent nation. The Sanhedrin court failed to correctly judge Herod, and put him to death for his Capital Crimes because Herod was appointed as king by the Roman occupiers!

    Some want to argue that Nazi ideology was not “purely” Xtian because it blended pagan Germanic elements, racial pseudoscience that favored culling inferior races, anti-clerical tendencies etc. But this argument utterly fails to ignore the plain and simple fact that for 2000+ years the church has publicly boasted that Europe converted to Xtianity and accepted that faith. Hence the curse: “by their fruits you shall know them” applies equally to both Xtian Europe and Muslim Arab lands which make the same boast! That those Middle East lands converted to embraced Allah as God & Muhammad as the last prophet.

    Arab propaganda has pulled a rhetoric rabbit out of its hat! Nakba originally referred to the defeat of 5 Arab Armies and their failure to throw the Jews into the Sea; the nascent Jewish state (as coined by Constantin Zureiq in his 1948 pamphlet, blaming Arab disunity and aggression).. Changed Nakba unto the Arab refugees, while ignoring the greater “Nakba” of Jews thrown out of Arab lands!

    The Oral Torah stands upon the משל metaphor of Israelites making bricks through the medium of straw in ancient Egypt. The “bricks” נמשל, the logical middot taught by Rabbi Akiva’s 10 middot, Rabbi Yishmael’s 13 middot, and Rabbi HaGalilee’s 32 middot. The study of both Talmud and Midrashim – halacha and aggada builds the “construct” of understanding the intent of these texts through the basic building blocks of these 10, 13, and 32 respectively. The middot of Rabbi Akiva, Rabbi Yishmael, and Rabbi Eliezer HaGelili are literally paths of reasoning—ways we walk from text to halacha. Even inside Torah there are multiple derachim—Beit Hillel and Beit Shammai, Bavli and Yerushalmi—“eilu v’eilu divrei Elokim chayim.”

    Rambam’s Universal God follows the Avoda Zara of Xtian and Muslim theology just as his Universal bnai Noach represents only his own personal opinion among Reshonim peer scholars! The Reshonim did not poskin halacha from aggadic sources as did the Rambam. Halacha follows the majority and not a single minority opinion. The Rambam supporters centuries later confuse the lone Rambam misinterpretation of 7 mitzvot bnai noach as applicable to all Goyim Universally – simply bat shit crazy.

    The Rambam codification of halacha called Yad Chazakah as opposed to the false name Mishna Torah. Why the latter a false name for the Rambam halachic code? Because the Book of D’varim has the 2nd Name of Mishna Torah! Rabbi Yechuda Ha’Nasi named the 6 Orders of Sanhedrin courtroom rulings “Mishna” based upon the 2nd name of the Book of D’varim. Mishna Torah means “Common Law” – meaning law derived from courtroom common law precedent Case/Rule comparisons! The Rambam’s halachic code a Statute law that follows the model of Greek and Roman law imposed by governmental decrees rather than courtroom rulings. The two legal systems day and night different from one another.

    The post Shoah term “Righteous Gentile” refers to Goyim who risked their lives to save Jews from barbaric European Xtian European Nazis. World to Come refers to the brit cut between the pieces wherein Avram cut a brit alliance concerning the eternal future born birth of the people having the status of “Chosen Cohen seed of Avraham, Yitzak and Yaacov and not the future born seed of Moshe Rabbeinu which forced HaShem to make “t’shuva” and remember the oaths sworn to the Avot. Even HaShem cannot annul a Torah oath. But even Man can annul vows!

    The “Sanhedrin” under Roman authority compares to the “Sanhedrin” established by Napoleon. Both existed only as a rubber stamp – tits on a boar hog. Torah as constitution of a sovereign people vs Torah as religion of a powerless minority. Everything else—Rambam, Shulchan Aruch, Bnei Noach, Christianity, Islam, Nakba—fits into that split.

    Torah as constitution vs Torah as medieval “religion”; A republic of tribes in its land, not individuals shopping for “salvation.” Torah, dat, halacha, derech eretz, minhag—never “Judaism” as a private Sunday-style faith. Rambam’s 14 books (yad) are arranged thematically, not by tribes, land, courts, or real political institutions. This latter g’lut “Earth-quake”: shifts from “How does the people govern?” to “What is my individual chiyuv?” These codes are optimized for galut Jews, to survive as a religious minority without sovereignty. This represents a “medieval religionization” of Torah—the turning of brit Sinai into a statute-based religion.

    Reply

    1. Happy New Year Moshe – hope you’re not suffering too much living in perpetual war with religious fanatics, genocide merchants and war criminals?

      Reply

      2. How come Moshe? We’re not perpetually at war. We’re not carrying out genocide against our neighbours. We’re not run by extreme right-wing fanatics. I don’t see the comparison. I hope you survive the next year. I look forward to seeing Netanyahu on trial in the Hague.

      5. For the 1st time in the post 1948 Israeli Independence Israel fought and won a war started by Arabs. We now dominate the Middle East and Britain, France and Russia pee upon themselves.

      6. The only way Israel exists is because of US support and dollars. It’s Iran and Saudi who have much to say about the ME. Those extreme Jews play into their hands. They are fuelling armed resistance.

      15. I’ve just listened to a programme highlighting how an ‘army’ of fanatical Jews are illegally terrorising and driving Palestinians out of their own land. It’s time these extremists are dealt with!

      17. Only in your eyes and the eyes of other Israeli fanatics. Palestine is real and covered by law. Your barbaric thugs need locking up.

      18. Brain Dead denier of basic facts. The League of Nations established the “Palestine Mandate” in 1922. Ben Gurion terminated the UN Protectorate of Palestine in 1948. STFU.

      21. The Prophetic Mussar of the Tohor midda of t’shuva

        The Torah Parashat Vayishlach בראשית לד-לו addresses time-oriented commandments wherein “time” refers to wisdom rather than literal time tick-tock past history narratives. This Torah portion navigates complex stories which includes genealogies that embody deeper moral and ethical rebukes which later generations need to explore as understood through the wisdom of Mussar; a Jewish ethical, educational rebuke: active pursuit of fair restitution/compensation to the victim—rather than mere emotional guilt or substitutionary atonement. The relationship dynamics between Jacob’s family and the people of Shechem illustrate the significance of respecting sexual boundaries and ensuring that interactions conducted with both respect & honor. This contrasts sharply with certain Christian theological models of repentance, where forgiveness is framed through vicarious sacrifice, often without direct address of the victim’s pain or ongoing accountability.

         

        T’shuva a key tohor middah. It fundamentally requires remembering the past through introspection, as exemplified through the month of Elul, Rosh HaShanna and Yom Kippur. This “wisdom” makes no attempt to justify past reactionary folly. But rather attempts to weigh the need to address the nature of damages inflicted upon others which requires some kind of mutually agreed upon fair compensation of damages. The Prince and people of Sh’Cem sought to profit from their crimes, they never considered the need to fairly compensate the Yaacov and his family for the rape of his daughter. Simeon and Levi massacre the males, rescue Dinah, and the other brothers plunder the city. Jacob rebukes them for endangering the family, but they retort: “Should he treat our sister as a harlot?” (p’suk 34:31)—highlights their raw demand for justice, even if their method exceeds Torah bounds. Jacob’s return to Bethel, Rachel’s death in childbirth, and Esau’s genealogy—highlighting continuity across generations

        The genealogies imply that this wisdom of remembering past sexual folly, in order to due t’shuva – meaning pay some agreed upon terms or amounts to achieve some fair compensation of damages, greatly differs from the alien and utterly foreign substitute theology of repentance which totally ignores the pain suffered by the victims. Mussar principles of self-examination, character refinement, and moral accountability. T’shuva, a tohor middah, centers on honest remembrance of harm—especially sexual violation or disgrace (avoda zara dishonor in broader terms)—coupled with active, victim-centered restitution rather than emotional guilt or vicarious substitution. Esau’s extensive genealogy, underscore generational continuity: moral failings (or rectifications) simply don’t just disappear after the criminal generation dies out. War-crimes against Humanity never erased but must be confronted by descendants. Fear of Heaven means that peoples’ pursue t’shuva consequent to their ruined Good Name reputations, which might never heal across the span of generations.

        Guilt theology, such as ‘this false messiah died for you’ not the same thing as remembering past personal, in this specific case sex disgrace or avoda zara dishonor. This significant distinction – a vital Mussar k’vanna throughout the T’NaCH, Talmud, and Midrashim. Which embodies the principles of accountability, respect, and reflection, absolutely symbolized through Torah judicial court-trials, which make fair restitution of damages inflicted – as exemplified by the 10 plagues and the splitting of the Sea of Reeds.

         

        True t’shuva requires an honest acknowledgment of one’s sexual missteps, facilitating a path towards genuine correction and healing that others have suffered. The narratives compel us to reflect on past actions rather than ignore them, emphasizing that growth comes from inevitable missteps and the commitment to make amends. This t’shuva simply crucial for both individuals and communities seeking to forge healthy relationships. The detailed lineages rebuke the generations that moral failings (or corrections) pass down. Each generation must reflect on predecessors’ actions, rectify where possible, and avoid repeating past folly. This collective responsibility rejects “be here now” spiritual hippie individualism. Instead it fosters an ongoing ethical growth in families and communities.

         

        The actions of Shechem and his father highlight a critical ethical breach: the attempt to profit from wrongdoing without appropriate restitution. In contrast, the expectation of justice in Jewish law mandates compensatory measures for harm done. This underscores the significance of fairness and moral responsibility in interactions. The judicial trials and structures presented serve as models for community accountability. They reinforce the idea that restitution: not simply limited to mere transactional affair, but an ethical obligation that reflects respect for the victim and for communal harmony. The 1939 British White Paper triggered the Shoah as did American pride which now viewed refugee populations as inferior scum on par with Christ-Killer slanders.

        American attitudes in the 1930s–1940s reflected restrictive immigration quotas, intensified by the Great Depression, isolationism, and widespread antisemitism—including lingering “Christ-killer” slanders that portrayed Jews as collectively responsible for Jesus’ death, fueling prejudice. The 1938 Évian Conference (convened by FDR) exposed global reluctance: most nations (including the U.S.) refused to expand quotas for Jewish refugees, even post-Kristallnacht. Polls showed strong American opposition (e.g., ~72% against more Jewish immigrants in late 1938), sometimes viewing refugees as undesirable or inferior—echoing demeaning stereotypes. This collective failure to act, prioritizing national interests over humanitarian rescue, parallels the Shechemites’ self-serving avoidance of true restitution.

         

        The genealogical refrains in these chapters further embody the continuity of responsibility across generations. They remind us that recognizing and rectifying past wrongs not limited to an individual personal journey. But rather a collective one, where each generation – called to learn from and address the failings of those before them. The ‘born again Xtian’ represents a total negation that limits faith to “be here now”. The narratives of this Torah prophetic mussar therefore serves as a powerful Aggadic/Midrashic story in the T’NaCH tradition which punctuates the importance of accountability, respect, and fair restitution.

         

        Through introspection and a commitment to t’shuva, individuals and communities strive to navigate their moral landscapes, with the common goal of achieving integrity in communal relationships and actions. This wisdom encourages a richly nuanced understanding of justice which emphasizes and prioritizes the transformative power of genuine reflection and ethical responsibilities, promoting healing and mutual respect among and between Jewish marriages and families. This prophetic call in Vayishlach urges ethical integrity, respect for boundaries (sexual and otherwise), and ongoing responsibility, vital for Jewish continuity and mutual honor in relationships.

      30. The last Torah interpretation of ”t’shuva”, requires a follow up Talmudic study-examination that addresses the same subject. Important basis of understanding: A fundamental distinction which separates the Book of בראשית from the תולדות Books of שמות, ויקרא, ובמדבר — pre-revelation of the Torah at Sinai, the Gods in the Heavens; post-revelation of the Torah at Sinai-שם השם lives only within the Yatzir Ha-Tov within the hearts of the Chosen Cohen people for eternity thereafter.
        Hence when the corrupt false Messiah JeZeus taught his ‘disciples’ how to pray, this Harry Potter fictional messiah did not know the basic distinction between how the Avot called upon יה, האל, אל, אלהים, אל שדי, או איש האלהים – all these Divine Names of the bnai brit soul, they thrive in the Heavens above, or עולם הבא; for example Avram cut the brit between the pieces with אל שדי touching the future born birth of all his children, but most specifically his chosen first born Cohen children – all of whom lived only in the world to come in Heaven.

        Post Sinai: the שם השם – (דברים ל) — לא בשמים היא, instructs a radically Sinai “shock” distinction. Post Sinai the local tribal god of the chosen Cohen people rules only within the borders of the promised land – the eternal inheritance of the chosen Cohen people alone; the jurisdiction of the Great Sanhedrin – likewise limited and restricted to within the borders of the 12 Tribe Cohen Republic; and despite the farcical false prophet Muhammad which taught that prophets sent to all peoples and nations, and these prophets speak in the native tongues of ‘all peoples and nations’, this fraud denies the simple Talmudic understanding that only the 12 Tribes of Israel accepted the Revelation of the Torah at Sinai. The proof for the Talmud’s instruction: Goyim pray to their Universal Gods who live in the Heavens.

        The fictional Harry Potter false messiah of the noise NT fraud taught his “disciples”: Matthew 6:9-13 – Our Farter in Heaven; the NT: a Protocols of the Elders of Zion – Roman fraud counterfeit because of its complete and total ignorance of the revelation of the Torah at Sinai which makes an eternal הבדלה distinction between how pre-Sinai Avot prophets called upon their local tribal god in heaven; from how the post Sinai – the chosen Cohen eternal seed of the Avot – call upon the exact same but different local tribal god, who dwells only in the Earth. This fundamental תורה עיקרי distinction, the stinky Noise NT Roman authors did not know that pre-Sinai our local god lived in the Heavens whereas post Sinai our local god lives only within the Yatzir Ha-Tov within the heart; according to how rabbi Yechuda Ha’Nasi explains the k’vanna of קריא שמע תפילה דאורייתא.

        The primary Talmudic locus for t’shuva is Masechet Yoma, which dissects Yom Kippur’s atonement mechanics but roots them in the post-Sinai heart. T’shuva “remembers”: A) the sworn oaths wherein the Avot cut a oath alliance brit touching the future born birth of the Chosen Cohen children of the Avot. Each Av swore a unique oath to cut the identical oath alliance brit which תמיד מעשה בראשית creates the Chosen Cohen People יש מאין על ידי את החכמה של זימן גרמא מצוות שנזקוק כוונה. Toldot positive and negative Torah commandments and Talmudic halachot do not require k’vanna. However employing these secondary commandments and halachot as בניני אבות precedents to other Torah commandments, this action raises/elevates these secondary commandments to primary time-oriented commandments. Based upon the precedent distinction which separates the Divine Names wherein the Avot of the Book of בראשית prayed to their local god in the heavens to the שם השם Sinai revelation wherein the local god of the Chosen Cohen seed of the Avot lives within the Yatzir-Tov of the heart. B) HaShem on Yom Kippur annulled His vow to profane the Torah oath alliance cut with the Avot, and establish Moshe Rabbeinu as the Father of the chosen Cohen people. Herein the Torah differentiates between oaths which neither HaShem nor Man can cancel; opposed by Vow which both Man & HaShem can annul.

        T’shuva’s primary Talmudic locus in Masechet Yoma (especially 86a-b), where Resh Lakish’s teachings—”Great is t’shuva, for intentional sins become unintentional” (via fear) and “intentional sins become merits” (via love/ahavah)—embody post-Sinai heart-work. T’shuva “remembers” in two layers. The sworn oaths cut by the Avot – as contained withing the opening p’suk of קריא שמע tefillah as contrasted by Tehillem prayers, this chochmah of זמן גרמא מצוות distinct and apart from toldot prayers, commandments and halachot.

        Tefillah – opens with שמע wherein אלהים separates HaShem from HaShem; wherein Israel accepts the yoke of the kingdom of Heaven-the Written and Oral Torah revelations at Sinai & Horev. Tehillem prayers do not require k’vanna because they do not qualify as time-oriented commandments as does tefillat kre’a shma. Translating the רוח הקודש שם השם to other words, regardless יה, האל, אל, אלהים, אל שדי, איש האלהים, JeZeus, or Allah etc, precisely duplicates the Av tumah avoda zarah of the Sin of the Golden Calf wherein the ערב רב שאין להם יראת אלהים translated Elohim for the רוח הקודש שם השם לשמה.

        Yom Kippur, framing teshuva as an internal, post-Sinai act that “remembers” the Avot’s oaths—sworn alliances creating the Cohen people yesh me’ayin (from nothing) through chochma of zman grama mitzvot, which demand kavana to align the heart’s yetzer ha-tov with the Sinai revelation. Resh Lakish teaches: “Great is teshuva, for it causes intentional sins to be reckoned as unintentional” (when motivated by fear/yirah), and “intentional sins to be reckoned as merits” (when from love/ahava)—embodying the heart’s return that heals backsliding (Hosea 14:5). This duality reflects post-Sinai immanence: teshuva from love fully integrates sins into the yetzer ha-tov’s divine spark, unlike pre-Sinai external britot (e.g., Avram’s with El Shaddai, touching future heavenly seed). Contradictions in verses (e.g., “Return, backsliding children, I will heal” vs. “I will heal their backsliding”) resolve as love (erasing sin as if never occurred) versus fear (healing but remembering sin), or even teshuva compelled by suffering.

        Yoma 86b’s baraita categorizes atonement introduces other interpretations of t’shuva based upon the kabbalah of ישעיהו כב:יד, מט:ג וגם ויקרא טז:ל. Based upon the floods of Noach profaning a Torah oath threatens the existence of the entire World. Discernment defines judgment. The dedication of a barbeque unto Heaven – the rejected offering made by Cain – the rejected first born Cohen son. Korbanot, like tefillah require שם ומלכות – an oath sworn dedication of Oral Torah middot לשמה. Ideally the tefillah oath sworn while standing before a Sefer Torah; whereas the korban the שם ומלכות Torah oath sworn while standing before the altar. Obviously if a person lacks the חכמה which discerns between the k’vanna distinctions that separates ה’ from ה’ from אל from רחום from חנון etc, such an עם הארץ lacks k’vanna just as a person who observes Shabbat but fails to discern – not doing acts of מלאכה on the day of Shabbat dedicates doing these חכמה מלאכות throughout the 6 days of Shabbat. Doing mitzvot as מלאכה defines the k’vanna of time-oriented commandments which create מלאכים in the Heavens. The creation of מלאכים through tohor time-oriented Av commandments defines the intent of מגן אברהם.

        Rabbi Eliezer calls upon a Bat Kol from heaven. This Mishna of כלים addresses the most complex and difficult subject in the whole of the Sha’s Bavli – tohor vs tumah. Rabbi Meir perhaps the most profound authority on this exceptionally difficult subject. Rabban Gamliel showed a tuma lack of respect to both rabbi Meir – capable of adducing 48 proofs for purity or impurity on any matter, Eruvin 13b – by expunging his Name from the Mishna and Rabbi Yehoshua – which broke the camel’s back and caused his own public humiliation of being replaced as the Nasi. Rabbi Yehoshua understood רשות as a Torah חיוב כוונה.

        The dispute between Rashi & Rabbeinu Tam appearance of 3 stars vs. פלג המנחה defines the distinction which separates how Rabban Gamliel vs. rabbi Yehoshua interpreted the k’vanna of רשות. Tefillah דאורייתא – Kre’a Shma. This tefillah ideally a person sits while wearing tefillen. Tefillen like a Sefer Torah in matters of swearing oaths. Rabbi Yehoshua understood תפילת ערבית as a רשות mitzva. Meaning the k’vanna of saying קריא שמע ערבית בזמן של פלג המנחה – its still day, therefore a person has רשות to place tefillen and affix the Kre’a Shma ערבית to the מנחה Shemone Esrei, and the ערבית תפילה to the קריא שמע המיטה, said prior to sleeping; at that time for sure 3 stars have appeared in the Heavens.

        This ties into t’shuva because נידוי learns from ger tzeddik. Where the ger tzeddik qualifies as a tohor new creation’ so too the person placed into the curse of נידוי too qualifies as a “tuma new creation”. For example, if a רשע refuses to give his ex-wife her Get, a Torah court could place the curse of נידוי upon that arrogant man, who publicly profanes his קידושין made before kosher witnesses and a minyan of 10 men, and issue a Get to the enchained ex-wife. Gittin 88b: Courts may compel a get, even with rods if needed. ר”א died in cherem, so this Torah curse not limited to 30 days, shamata, like a standard nazir vow.

        The Sages burned his tahor declarations and excommunicated him for not yielding; he remained isolated, with his death marked by final words of “tahor” (Sanhedrin 68a; various aggadic accounts). Post-death, Rabbi Yehoshua revoked the ban, affirming his ultimate purity (tearing garments in mourning). This shows nidui can function as a lifelong “curse” for profound communal threats, yet teshuva (or posthumous recognition) restores. The court may authorize agents to issue the get if he persists (Yevamot 90a; Ketubot 77a).

        Earthly courts wield nidui as a tool of coercion and transformation, annulling vows/oaths of profanation within Israel’s borders—rejecting heavenly appeals (as in Rabbi Eliezer’s bat kol) while restoring the yetzer ha-tov’s divine spark. Rabbi Eliezer’s enduring nidui until death highlights the gravity of refusing communal authority, yet his story ends in purity, affirming teshuva’s ultimate triumph.

      33. Jews do not “wait” for some pie in the sky messiah savior from heaven. The Sinai revelation revealed the Divine Presence in this Earth. From Sinai till today Jews do not pray to some avoda zara God in heaven. We dedicate tohor middot לשמה from within our hearts – the ‘temple’ where HaShem dwells in this Earth since Sinai.

        The distinctions between the names of God in different contexts, such as those used by the patriarchs versus the revelation at Sinai, are significant in Jewish thought. Galatians 3:24 rhetoric refers to “Law” but fails to specify the difference between Torah Sanhedrin judicial common law from Roman Senate statute law. Furthermore its rhetoric distorts the concept of Torah faith defined by צדק צדק תרדוף – pursue justice. Its substitute theology replaces this New God JeZeus as the epicenter of faith!

        Galatians corrupt rhetoric addressed to Goyim who never accepted the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. Hence Goyim have no part no inheritance in the revelation of the local tribal god HaShem. Galatians speaks to Goyim not Jews. Goyim never accepted the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. Therefore the lie “our guardian … faith” utter and completely false.

        The NT rhetoric theology teaches belief in this new God JeZeus. It knows absolutely nothing touching the revelation of Torah courtroom common law. The latter shares no common ground with religious theological “belief systems”. The NT straight up worships a foreign alien avoda zara new Universal Father/Son\Holy Ghost God. The revelation of the Torah at Sinai exposed a local tribal god of the 12 tribes of Israel who brought freedom to enslaved Israelites and blessed Israel to conquer the lands of Canaan. The NT Universal God does not supersede the local tribal god of Sinai.

        The 4th Oral Torah middah of רחום directly connected to the Blessing – rule the land with justice vs. the Curse – return to Egyptian g’lut slavery & oppression. Hence the Torah commands to totally uproot the Nations of Canaan, kill the stubborn and rebellious child, make eternal war against Amalek – understood as Jewish intermarriage and assimilation the Torah refers to as ערב רב; these latter Torah commandments if obeyed prevents Jewish worship of avoda zara and injustice within the conquered homeland. Hence “Mercy”.

        Jews do not “wait” for some pie in the sky messiah ‘last days’ savior from heaven. The Sinai revelation revealed the Divine Presence in this Earth. From Sinai till today Jews do not pray to some avoda zara God in heaven. We dedicate tohor middot לשמה from within our hearts – the ‘temple’ where HaShem dwells in this Earth since Sinai. Torah common law aint some mystical belief system; Torah does not prioritize the ‘End of Days’ mysticism which the mystic Book of Daniel records. Just as Torah does not have private names for Angels like as also found in the Book of Daniel. This mystical Book – the only Book in the T’NaCH written in Aramaic.

        The Talmud interprets mystic ideas affixed to practical rational halachic ritualism. Rhetoric belief system theologies an utter abomination on par with Baal worship. Torah judicial common law abhors theological belief systems as a form of “bribery”. Rhetoric theological constructs by definition manipulate, distort, & corrupt moral behavior. Prophets command mussar to all generations of Israel. Rhetoric theology promotes witchcraft – fortune tellers who predict the future. Torah judicial Sanhedrin courtroom common law most essentially addresses the need to impose fair restitution of damages inflicted by Jews upon other Jews within the borders of Judea. Belief systems have no central connection to the brit oath sworn lands and the chosen Cohen people. The “grafted onto” metaphor as bankrupt as “the End of Days” metaphor.

        The concept of numerical value of numbers hinting to word within words like בראשית — ברית אש, ראש בית, ב’ ראשית. The concept of a רמז extends to numerical gematria numbers. Like 18 – חי. The number 40 – מ, contains no words within words or numbers. So what does the numerical value of 40 hint to? Noach’s flood lasting 40 days not a concealed hint. Contrast the concealed hint following the Golden Calf – Oral Torah revelation! The 40 years in the wilderness directly refers to the death of an entire generation. The hint of curse exile taught. The Book of Yonah compares to the Book of Job, both teach the concealed Torah curse that exile goes hand-in-glove with destruction and disasters.

        The Creation story introduces the רמז of 7. The concealed central theme of Torah wisdom known as time-oriented commandments. Impossible to understand ‘shabbat rest’ without discerning the difference between two critical Hebrew verbs, both of which mean “work”… מלאכה VS עבודה. The former qualifies as a Torah wisdom, not so the latter. For example: Cain’s barbeque to heaven rejected because it failed to dedicate Torah wisdom. Hevel korban accepted because his offering separated ‘substance from form’. A korban requires swearing a Torah oath with שם ומלכות, translating words to other words fails to instruct the wisdom of why a Torah oath requires the defined meaning behind the משל of שם ומלכות; acceptance of the written & oral Torahs revealed at Sinai & Horev.

        Day of rest by not doing wisdom acts of מלאכה directly implies that a person does commit to doing works of מלאכה throughout the rest of the new week! Not every Jew trained in skilled labor – like as required to construct the Mishkan. But even the poorest Jew can do mitzvot with k’vanna has wisdom which elevates any Torah or Talmudic commandment or halachot to a time-oriented commandment – the Crown of the Torah.

        The substitute theology “religion” imposed by the NT supercessionism seeks to replace the Central Top priority of Torah faith – to rule the land with righteous justice – as imposed by righteous common law courtrooms. Prophets the police enforcers of Sanhedrin courtroom common law judicial rulings. Supercessionism, (replacement theology), declares the New Testament religious faith in JeZeus as messiah, fulfills ie supersedes the archaic ‘Old Testament’. This hostile rhetoric propaganda introduced by Romans prior to the Jewish revolts; in Alexandria (49-50 CE), the First Jewish Revolt (66-73 CE), and the Bar Kokhba Revolt (132-135 CE).

        Impossible to “fulfill” prophetic mussar, like the Protocols of the Elders of Zion Roman NT forgery proclaims throughout the gospels. Prophetic mussar has no ‘past’, this Torah instruction by prophets applies straight across the board to all generations of the Jewish people. Torah commands mussar not history as the rhetoric of NT propaganda declares.

        Roman forgery propaganda rhetoric employs Av tuma avoda zara theological narratives to manipulate the minds of Goyim totally uneducated in Torah common law. This rhetoric declare a lock & key monopoly over the Torah mitzva of Moshiach. The broad agenda rhetoric of NT manipulation aligns with replacing the ”Old Testament” with the ”New Testament”. It perverts prophesy unto fortune telling witchcraft. The righteous pursuit of judicial fair restitution of damages inflicted upon others with waiting for divine 2nd coming interventions – a complete and utter abomination on the order of homosexuality vs the mitzva be fruitful and multiply.

        Mussar instruction timeless and not “historical”. The portrayal of prophetic fulfillment in the NT is viewed as part of a broader agenda to establish a theological narrative that effectively supplants the Jewish understanding of the Torah. The righteous pursuit of judicial restitution aligns closely with core Jewish values, emphasizing personal responsibility and ethical conduct. Judicial courtroom justice this Torah “commitment to life, continuity, and ethical living” essentially defines the k’vanna of the revelation of HaShem on this Earth at Sinai.

      36. The study of literature learns through compare and contrast.

        Torah common law not to be confused with Xtian and Muslim religious theology wherein both religions created their Gods, from the Nicene Creed to Islam’s strict Monotheism Universal God. The Book of Yonah compares to the Book of Job. Both address the destruction of g’lut. The Assyrian empire conquered by the Babylonian empire shortly after Yonah. Torah common law not a religion – bottom line. During the Dark Ages period of the Crusades Jews favored to convert Torah judicial common law courts into a Codified statute law religion strikingly similar to the Catholic church during its scholastic period during this time period.

        The kabbalah concept of שכינה makes a סוד opaque – concealment of light – reference to the Sinai revelation of the שם השם wherein Torah permanently revealed as the revelation of this local tribal god in this world. The construction of the Mishkan, likewise another Torah revelation at Sinai to this precise same impact. The 13 tohor middot revealed at Horev following the Golden Calf, rabbi Yochanon taught the סוד opaque kabbalah that all ברכות צריך שם ומלכות; meaning that swearing a Torah oath לשמה requires the sanctification of Oral Torah middot or מלכות. Hence the Shemone Esrei contains 3 + 13 + 3 blessings – תרי”ג; Six Yom Tov + Shabbat – the opening and closing three blessings and the 13 chol and one shabbat blessing(s) refer to the direction of future social behavior through some dedicated tohor middah. Herein defines the K’vanna of all korbanot dedications.

        The distinctions in Divine names (e.g., El Shaddai for the patriarchs vs. the Tetragrammaton at Sinai) underscore this shift: the patriarchs experienced God through promises and personal encounters, but Sinai revealed a national, judicial common law legalism. Justice the one word definition of Freedom from Egyptian slavery and invasion of Canaan לשמה.

        Law as a “guardian” (παιδαγωγός, often translated as tutor or schoolmaster) until faith in Christ arrives misrepresents Torah as temporary or punitive, rather than an eternal system of pursuing justice. The Sinai revelation no more waits upon JeZeus than do Jews today. Torah functions as the Constitutional mandate of Sanhedrin common law ‘legislative review’ courtroom law. דברים טז:כ – the command to pursue justice actively through courts and ethical behavior. This shares no common ground with: get “Saved & baptized in the name of JeZeus.”

        he Torah’s blessings and curses (e.g., ויקרא כו) – tied to ruling the land with justice, uprooting Canaanite avoda zara; meaning to prevent assimilation (ערב רב) and intermarriage. Amalek in all generations the consequences of Jewish assimilation and intermarriage.

        The Book of Shemuel addresses the subject of Moshiach for the first time? No. Such a טיפש פשט fails to grasp that the NaCH Prophets and Holy Writings serve as hand maidens to the Kallah Torah bride; Moshe the greatest of the Prophets. Moshe anointed the House of Aaron as Moshiach; Penchas lead the warriors against the king of Moav who hired Bil’aam to curse Israel as משיח מלחמה. The entire purpose of korbanot to dedicate צדק צדק תרדוף as the definition of Torah faith.

        Confusing the forms of faith for the substance of faith turned the heart of king Shlomo to worship avoda zara. The “temple” not some grand Catholic Cathedral but Federal Sanhedrin Courtroom common law wherein the Cities of Refuge serve as the spokes of Federal law courts across the land. The Talmud Chagigah 13a warns against excessive speculation concerning the kabbalah of time-oriented commandments expressed through מלאכה wisdom to create from nothing Angels/מלאכים. Even simple mitzvot with kavanah become time-oriented, the “Crown of Torah” (Shabbat 127a).

        The Rambam’s critique in Moreh Nevuchim 1:50-54, where he argues that Divine names reflect attributes of action in this world, not metaphysical essences causes my soul to retch; the Book of בראשית – before the revelation of the Torah at Sinai לשמה. The first commandment Name רוח הקודש, whereas all other Divine Names – words. A fundamental רב חסד מאי נפקא מינא fundamental error made by assimilated to Greek logic rather than פרדס logic – Rambam. Assimilation and intermarriage defines the Yonah/Job\Daniel collapse of the Golden Age of Spain. Rambam’s code negated the charem of the Karaim deniers of the Oral Torah on par with the Tzeddukim during the Chanukkah Civil War!

        Thomas Aquinas’ Summa Theologica stands as the Catholic equivalent to the Rambam’s horrid Yad Chazaka. Mishna Torah means common law. Rambam’s assimilated Roman law codification – statute law! Another רב חסד מאי נפקא מינא fundamental error. The study of Talmud actively requires the compare and contrast of the different middot (ancient Egyptian bricks) building blocks developed by the Tannaim scholars and employed by all Amoraim scholarship upon the Mishna common law Case/Rule judicial codification made by rabbi Yechuda Ha’Nassi.

        The Yalkut Shimoni on Iyov learns that Holy Writing T’NaCH primary source commentary to the Books of the Prophets similar to Gemara’s relationship to the Mishna; it links Iyov’s afflictions to a microcosm of Israel’s exiles, teaching that restoration comes through pursuing justice, not theological resignation.

        The Zohar (Shemot 2:216b) describes the שם השם ציוי ראשון as light hidden in vessels, revealed through the Mishkan’s construction. HaShem לא בשמים היא – rather the Spirit Divine Presence Shekinah breathes within the Yatzir Ha-Tov of the heart – תפילה הדבר שבלב and not a Father and Son in Heaven. The prophets sometime inverse the Order of the Oral Torah middot רחום וחנון, based upon the כלל פרט כנגד רבוי מיעט Egyptian bricks made from straw. חנון expansive the next series of middot serve as definitions of חנון. Whereas רחום restricts based upon the commandment concerning treatment of the people of Canaan, the stubborn and rebellious son, Amalek, and Torah blessings & curses. Bottom line: do not confuse mercy with pity.

        Korbanot exist only as time oriented commandments which require k’vanna – the opposite of Cains sacrifice! Yeshayahu 1:11-17, HaShem rejects offerings without מלכות Oral Torah middot dedications. Its not the form of living blood that a korban dedicates but rather the substance of the dedication of Horev Oral Torah tohor middot!

        Chagigah 13a warns against speculating on ma’aseh bereishit (creation) or merkavah (chariot) mysticism, read through the simplistic טיפש פשט of literal word for word translations. Torah instructs through משל\נמשל rational discipline; Joseph interpreted dreams. Dreams which lack an interpretation compare to a letter never opened and read. Torah common law does not compare to a Harry Potter work of fiction that simple minded children can read and enjoy. Torah common law stands upon the יסוד of בניני אבות-precedents. Talmudic precedents function as logical proofs based upon the understanding that Talmud as 70 faces like the facets of a diamond!

        Sefer בראשית together with its Divine Names – pre Sinai. Just that simple. No fancy dance’n. The לשמה Sinai brit, this Divine Spirit lives within the hearts of the chosen Cohen People. Goyim pray to their Gods who dwell in the Heavens. Rambam’s rationalism, influenced by Aristotelian Greek logic, sidelines the פרדס (Pardes) hermeneutic organized into a warp\weft threads of דרוש\פשט – the Aggadah. And רמז/סוד – the Halacha. פרדס inductive logic which conducts a compare and contrast T’NaCH prophetic mussar to halacha which serves as precedents ie a unique perspective by which scholars re-interpret the language intent of the Mishna based upon this בנין אב logical comparison of Case/Rule to similar but different Case\Rule judicial rulings.

        A Three-Man Torts Court divides the justices of the Court. One judge assigned as the Prosecuting attorney. The second judge as the Defense attorney. The Difficulty/Answer style of the Gemara edited to communicate this model for a future Sanhedrin Court room once Jews re-conquered the oath brit Home land. T’NaCH\Talmudic inductive logic as far removed from Greek philosophy deductive logic as the lights of Hanukkah despise the T’zeddukim attempts to cause Israel to forget the Oral Torah and also turn Jerusalem into a Greek polis!

        Yonah Gerondi wrote Shaarei Teshuva after the disaster of 1242 burning of all Talmudic manuscripts across France in Paris bon-fires. Gerondi duplicated the error of the brothers Hashmonaim who requested that Pompey resolve their dynastic dispute during a prior Hanukkah Civil War some 1000 years previous. The Jewish Civil War witness not only the destruction of the common law Rashi/Tosafot school – all Jews expelled from France in 1306.

        But it generated chaos and anarchy that disrupted Jewish refugee exposed nakedness before Goyim enemies; the king of England first imposed taxation without representation then expelled all Jews in 1290. The German kingdoms likewise robbed plundered and made forced population transfers. Pauperization of Jews cause the Vatican decree of ghetto gulah imprisonment of all Western European Jewry which in its turn caused another mass population transfer of Jews from Western to Eastern Europe. Then came the 1648 Cossack pogroms!

        Rambam’s code, while brilliant for impoverished g’lut refugee populations scattered across Western Europe during the dying days of the Dark Ages, its inherent corruption – flattened T’NaCH Talmudic common Case\Din law into Aristotelian categories, akin to Aquinas’ fusion of faith and reason egg-crate dogmatism, which the Baal HaMaor cricized the Rif common law code and later the Vilna Gaon critiqued the Rambam’s Yechuda jumping into the Sea of Reeds emphasis on religious codification observance of halacha prioritized over Talmudic depth of inductive פרדס logic; the k’vanna of lighting the lights of Hanukkah.

        As mentioned above, the Yalkut Shimoni on Iyov (Remez 906) indeed frames Iyov’s sufferings as a microcosm of Israel’s exiles—from Egypt to Babylon to Rome—teaching that geulah demands active pursuit of justice (צדק), not passive theological surrender. This midrashic commentary functions unto Gemara Aggada: a primary lens on NaCH (Prophets and Writings), linking personal affliction to national t’shuva. Restoration not through resignation, but rather courtroom equity – echoing Devarim 16:20’s mandate.

        Tefillah is דבר שבלב (matter of the heart, Berachot :כו) rejects Tehillem prayers as comparable to tefillah oaths; Jews do not pray to any Father-Son duality in the Heavens. Yeshayahu 1:11-17 condemns form without substance: HaShem spurns blood offerings absent מלכות (kingdom)—Oral Torah middot from Horev. The dedication isn’t animal life but tohor attributes, elevating the act to the Torah’s crown (Shabbat 127a). This aligns with the Zohar’s vessel metaphor: external form holds inner light of middot.

  9. The Revelation of the Torah at Sinai vs. the worship of other Gods

    Substance vs. Form … נמשל כנגד משל. Confusing the metaphor of the golden Ark for its Oral Torah interpretation as taught in the Book of D’varim 5th Book of the Torah 30:12 – השם “לא בשמים היא”.

    The Talmud instructs that the mitzva of tefillah stands different from avoda zara prayer in that tefillah a matter of the heart while Goyim prayer to their God directed unto Heaven. Herein explains how the “story” of the Tabernacle and its vessels differentiates from the Names of God in the first Book of the Torah from the revelation of God at Sinai. Just as Moshe the most humble of all men – based upon HaShem the most humble of the Gods!

    HaShem a local tribal god which only Israel accepted at Sinai to this very day. Post Sinai HaShem dwells within the Yatzir Ha-Tov within the hearts of Israel the chosen Cohen people alone. All other Gods live in the Heavens above. Hence the Torah says that Avraham called unto his god by the name El Shaddai and did not know the Name HaShem because he lived before the revelation of the Torah at Sinai.

    Jewish assimilation & intermarriage with Goyim who never accepted the revelation of the Torah at Sinai which permanently established the chosen Cohen people, and defines the mitzva to eternally war against Amalek/anti-semitism from generation to generation.

    Reply

Leave a Reply