Headteachers march on Downing Street to protest Tory Education cuts!

In an unprecedented move Headteachers from all over the country are marching on Downing Street to protest the terrible effects of continual Tory Cuts.

If I was still working I’d certainly be marching with them!

An 8% cut in the funding for each child has resulted in larger class sizes, a loss of support staff and cuts in teaching staff. The affect on schools is major.

Tory Lies try to obfuscate. They claim they are spending more on education. Yes they are but inflation means than in real terms there are big cuts! On top of that a lot of the budget is being wasted on silly Tory stupidities – like Free Schools, Grammar Schools, Religious Schools and Academies.

We’ve already had teachers pay and pensions slashed and their workload increased dramatically. They are leaving in droves.

Education is the future of our country. To shortchange our kids is appalling.

Do the Tories only care about the Public Schools and the elite? Or are they willing to give kids from poor backgrounds a fair chance?

This current protest really shows the strength of feeling. This is no union action. This is a spontaneous action from grassroots Headteachers.

They have had enough of Tory decimation of public services!

They know how bad things have got!

They think our kids are worth better!

Education is in crisis!

The Crisis with Teachers! There’s not enough of them!

This is the week that schools go back and it highlights the terrible crisis that has been created by this government.

There is nothing more crucial a child having a good teacher.

It is a travesty for a child to have a poor teacher.

Teaching is an extremely difficult and exhausting job. It has changed greatly over the last decades. The skills required are enormous. Long gone are the days of chalk and talk.

This government has piled on the work, increased class sizes and made an enormous increase in demands and changes. This has made the task of teaching almost impossible.

At the same time they have made detrimental changes to pensions and had a nine year pay freeze.

You pay peanuts you get monkeys.

Is this what we want? – A substandard service?

In my view poor teachers damage children and damage their future.

Instead of attracting quality staff we are losing them at an alarming rate. The end result is that our children and grandchildren are increasingly being taught by poor quality teachers who are exhausted and demoralised. They are teaching curriculums they do not support and having to teach syllabi that they do not agree with. Education has become prescriptive and stifling.

As our children go back they are facing a crisis in teaching that is many faceted and needs highlighting!!

Our children deserve better than this!!

Vision is no good without consensus.

The important thing was to involve everyone, value their input and be prepared to compromise so that they had ownership while remaining true to the basic philosophy. The fact that it involved everyone in putting it together meant that they all had a vested interest in making it work. Many of the potential dissenters were brought into consensus. We had fun, respect and care agreed by all staff. We could build on it.

The way to disaster is to impose change or philosophy. That results in lip-service. If everyone is unhappy or pulling in different directions nothing will gel.

 

The staff of any institution are made up of a great number of personality types. In order to be effective these have all got to be harnessed and unified. I found this out early on when introducing school dances. School dances had been unruly, troublesome affairs that the staff hated and refused to give up their time for. I wanted to reintroduce them with live bands. I made my case that the students deserved them and they would energise the school. Some were swayed over by my enthusiasm and argument that the kids would love them and it would feed into better relationships. I discovered that if I brought in an intricate, well thought through system that demonstrated I had addressed all possible eventualities, provided adequate cover and a range of patrolling likely to prevent trouble, all done with charts, lists, teams and detailed organisation I won over a number of the more logically minded who were sceptical of enthusiasm. They pawed over my intricate diagrams, rotas and arrangements, offered improvements and we were away. It was a lesson to me.

 

It is all about detailed planning, open discussion, compromise and taking account of the range of different views and personalities. You can never win them all over though but gaining a majority gives you credibility.

 

From the moment the vision was passed by the school everything that took place in it emanated from those words no matter how difficult that became. If it wasn’t open, caring and friendly it wasn’t worth a fig. If it wasn’t fair it had no place. If lessons weren’t fun and challenging they were worthless.

 

For my part as a Head this meant doing lots of things that made my life a lot harder but demonstrated clearly that I believed those words were more than words – that I believed in every letter of them. They were probably things that most people never noticed, took for granted or thought were plain daft.

 

As a deputy and a Head I was Mr open, caring friendly.

 

The most important thing I did was to smile and greet each and every student as often as I could. I positioned myself at the beginning of the day in the corridor and said hello to everyone. Gradually the majority, who had sidled past in silent embarrassment, began to smile and say hello back. It was friendly and respectful. It was nice. No matter how stressed and unhappy I felt I tried to project a positive attitude and quiet assurance. I can’t begin to tell you how difficult this was at those times when your stress levels were through the roof, your morale and confidence was rock bottom, and you didn’t know if you were going to survive the week.

 

I toured the school saying hello to staff and students and asking how they were. I was not checking on how well they were teaching or what they were doing but in the process I picked up how they were feeling and the mood. I could tell by walking into a classroom and sensing the atmosphere if things were right or not. I got to know the potential of my staff and who was underperforming.

 

I treated non-teaching staff with the same respect as teaching staff. We were all one team working for the good of the kids. They were equally important in creating the atmosphere and learning environment of the school. They were human beings of equal value to everyone else. They were doing a range of sometimes unpleasant jobs, pressured jobs, and difficult jobs, often underappreciated and certainly incredibly poorly paid. They deserved equal respect.

 

I talked to all staff in a friendly informal manner.

 

I talked to students and staff who held diametrically opposed views to my own. I gave them a platform and listened. I argued forcefully but I did not impose my views. I did instruct them how I wanted students talked to and dealt with though. I wanted them treating with respect. Shouting at students was strongly denounced.

 

My door was always open so that staff and students could drop in without appointment. If they were upset it was important that I gave my time and listened. I could then address problems and comfort people. It meant that most things could be nipped in the bud before they started to fester.

 

I politely insisted on certain standards, shirts being tucked in, ties done up, students not pushing and shoving, an orderly passage in our crowded corridors. I wanted a degree of smartness with a modicum of individuality. The students still had their bracelets, weird hairstyles and accoutrements. We could have standards without it becoming claustrophobically draconian. I knew from my own school days that pushing too hard on this led to student anger and rebellion. They resented it. It did not promote the harmony of relationship I was seeking. Yet there was room for a compromise. We had to have certain standards and they had to be enforced. If I did that enforcing, in a polite reasoned manner, then the staff would as well. If we had a polite orderliness then there was a good environment for learning. Students might not like this but would accept it if it was done well. Most staff ducked confrontations with students but I felt that as long as there were collectively agreed rules we should abide by them. If I had my way I would have done away with uniform altogether. There are countries were the education is extremely effective without having to resort to the de-individualisation of uniforms. I hate uniforms. However, the minor confrontations established authority so that when bigger issues arose the authority was already firmly recognized and subsequent behaviour patterns fell into place more easily. I was careful not to allow this to become heavy handed or disrespectful. It was not a power tool. This was an area I had rebelled at whilst at school. I could understand the feelings of the students. But I also knew that it gave them something to rebel against.

 

I signed each and every one of hundreds of certificates by hand. It would have been easy to save myself hours of mindless signing but I was mindful of the DJ Alan Freed. He had always played his records in the studio while they went out on air. Other DJ’s would turn the sound off. He explained that, when questioned as to why he did this, ‘the listeners knew when you weren’t listening’. I think they did. They could tell if you cared and were enjoying it or not or merely going through the motions. For me, if a student was prepared to put in a term’s worth of sustained effort the least I could do was to recognise that with a simple signature.

 

I tried hard to not just focus on the staff and students I liked best but to give time to the ones I didn’t like quite as much – the miserable and dissenting. Only through open communication could you change people. If persuasion didn’t work imposition would merely inflame. The only way forward was through open dialogue. If dialogue was suppressed there would be a worthless dictatorship that would be destined to achieve mediocrity. No matter how frustrating or antagonistic someone was being they had to have the opportunity to speak their mind. I would listen and take on board what they were saying, weigh it up, and if I disagreed I’d explain my feelings.

 

I always apologised if I got things wrong. If you do stuff you get stuff wrong! I found I was often having to say sorry.

 

I fought for all those things that meant something to me, that emanated from that ethos of fairness, such as mixed ability teaching, effort assessment (and not achievement), PSHE, a pastoral care and support system based on remedial action, support and relationship rather than punishment. I was delighted when this started coming through as restorative practice and SEAL. These are two of the best initiatives there had ever been. They mirror my own beliefs. They are transformative. Forget your teaching and learning – education is about relationship! Often these things are not universally popular. Headship is not about always making popular decisions. It is about making decisions that are right for the students. The students must always come first. When there were issues that were unpopular then I tried to discuss and explain rather than impose.

Management is also about relationship.

 

In the UK:

In the USA:

 

 

Fighting to free students from tyranny.

From day one I set about freeing the students from the strictures of a failed system. That failed system was the 1950s model which had so utterly failed me and my fellow students; a system that enabled a chosen elite to prosper at the expense of the rest; an education system that was one great mind-destroying memory test drummed in through numbing repetition and tedious copying and memorising of facts.

 

Education was too important to be at the beck and call of politicians. We had to wrest it back from them and instil it with life and vitality.

 

Back in college me and my best friend Pete Smith, who later went on to found ‘Wild Science’, were of the same opinion – that the education system was boring and unfair; it reduced people and subjects down to less than what they were and needed overhauling. Pete dropped out to do it – I dropped in. I wanted to see if the madmen could successfully take over the institution.

 

The first step was to transform the philosophy into a working ethos that could begin to permeate the whole school. I had introduced this as a senior teacher and lowly member of the senior team fourteen years before I became a Head. The result was a stated ethos discussed and shared with all staff and students which took the form of a mission statement:

 

A friendly, open caring and successful school

 

A school offering equal opportunity for all

 

A school which values the complete development of all students and staff

 

A school committed to the continual raising of standards

 

This was thrashed out through repeated meetings with lots of healthy argument. As far as I was concerned it had to stem from my philosophy. That’s what I fought for. As long as the caring, fairness and development was in there they could have their standards. For me the standards would come out of the process. If our students felt valued, respected and cared for and experienced lessons that were fun and thought provoking the results would follow. We did not have to focus on teaching and learning; we had to focus on excitement and challenge. If students were engaged and excited by education learning would take place.

In the UK:

In the USA:

 

 

 

An education philosophy based on experience

I became obsessed with devising an effective education system that was fair and respectful and one that worked better than that vicious sausage machine.

I wanted enlightened education.

I was sure that most parents did not really want their children to go to institutions that terrorised them and trampled their spirits into blind compliance. They wanted their children to be liberated, inspired, loved, filled with self-esteem, and raised to their potential.

They did not want a factory that churned out exam results but reduced their children’s personalities to mindless automatons.

I was also sure that (particularly the parents of students who would not get into selective grammar school system) they would not want a system that wrote off ninety percent of kids so that the esteemed ten percent could prosper.

I believe elitism creates resentment and failure.

I believe it could be done in a different way. My vision is of a comprehensive system with mixed ability teaching that promotes equality and breeds success.

A teacher could run a classroom with authority and respect without having to become a bully.

We could provide a loving, caring, respectful environment based around awe-inspiring lessons and creativity in which the whole child could develop into a beautiful adult.

Human beings have a history of cruelty, viciousness and destruction.

The world we have created is fuelled by aggression, violence, selfishness and greed. It is a world of exploitation, war and power largely dominated by psychologically damaged males.

It is my belief that the bullying environment we bring our children up in contributes to this.

If human beings, if nature, has a future we have to become civilised; we have to learn to live together in harmony and peace; we have to look at the bigger picture and put things right on the small stage. Schools are instrumental in changing the world. Without an education system based on love, compassion, empathy, tolerance and the development of the whole child I really believe we have no future on this planet. In thirty years time 7 billion of us will become 14 billion, nature will be consumed and we will then destroy each other with our own hatred as we compete for ever dwindling resources.

There is an alternative.

Enlightened education is the only answer.

 

The basis behind everything is philosophy. You have to start there. You sort out your philosophy and everything else evolves from that.

The philosophies I applied in my career were simple and basic. They stemmed from my upbringing, my beliefs and my experience. Above all my experiences in the world of education have added spice to my views. They are the same values I bring to all of my life: I did not need any religious moral code to arrive at it. It is pure common sense:

 

Everything should be fair

 

All people are equally valuable

 

Living things should be respected

 

Everything can be made better

 

Education should be fun and expanding

In the UK:

In the USA:

 

 

On Teaching and Discipline

I will repeat this a lot: – teaching is all about relationship. Without a nourishing relationship based on mutual respect between students and teachers you cannot achieve good learning whatever system you deploy. Learning stems from relationship. Relationship develops from attitude and personality. A teacher has to give and share of themselves. They have to care. It is the hardest and most worthwhile job in the world. Without care and compassion the classroom is a prison for both teacher and students.

 

Nothing can work unless it is based on a clear philosophy that is understood by all concerned and agreed by the majority.

 

Within every institution there will be a number of dissenters who do not agree with the stated philosophy. These dissenters need to be won over, disarmed or dismissed.

There are some bullying teachers who seek to run their classroom with a rod of iron, shouting in students’ faces and intimidating everyone. They firmly believe this is how it should be done. They see themselves as the strong authority figure. What they say goes. According to them if kids did as they were told there wouldn’t be any problems.

What they don’t seem to realise that if everyone behaved like they do the school would be unbearable. I was brought up in a school like that. It bred belligerence, rebellion and anger.

Students would store up their pent up frustration and fear and take it out on everyone else in a hierarchy of displacement behaviour.

When I first arrived at the Grammar School in 1975 there were fights most break-times and a cold, macho atmosphere. Bullying was rampant. This is the result of too much classroom intimidation and too rigid systems.

The bullying teachers thought themselves strong. They controlled their classroom. There was no dissent. It ran like clockwork. Many of the students admired the control exerted and respected the order. One thing students do not like is a teacher who does not control a class. A class has to be controlled. That is fundamental. My point is entirely based on how this is done. Bullying should not be an option.

The bullying teachers openly spoke disparagingly of other teachers and undermined them whenever possible.

For the teachers in the wake of these classroom bully teachers life was hard. They would receive a class all pent up and frustrated. The resultant disorderly lessons were merely viewed as evidence that everyone should be adopting a forceful approach. Their view was ‘Students needed to know, in no uncertain terms, who was the boss’.

I experienced my share of classroom bullying when I was at school and I know how it made me feel. Back then I simmered with anger, fury and resentment. The fact that, as a small boy, I was impotent to answer back or stand up to the teacher bullies made it worse. I resented them and hated them with a vengeance. I used every means to undermine, disrupt and oppose. I adopted sullen and open disdain. There was nothing I enjoyed more that standing there looking those teachers straight in the eye, replying ‘Yes Sir’ in a slurred, sneer of disrespect that would send them incandescent with impotence. I took immense pleasure from making them apoplectic through a display of controlled defiance while doing nothing overtly wrong. It was all about attitude. No amount of intimidation or punishment was effective with me. The pleasure I gained from getting through to them was ample compensation for any punishment they dished out. This hatred even went as far as puncturing tyres with a penknife and scraping car bodywork I am ashamed to say.

Indeed my hatred for those ‘little Hitlers’ was so great that if one of those three evil bastards from my childhood classrooms were to walk into a room, unlikely I know, as they must be all long dead by now, I would have great trouble controlling my fury. Just thinking about them raises my blood pressure. To this very day if I was asked to put a list of the worlds most evil people it would, of course, include such beasts as Pol Pot, Stalin, Hitler, and Vlad the Impaler, but it would also include those three teachers.

It seems incredible to me that they should still engender such bitter hatred fifty years on. But I still hate them with a passion. These were people who were supposed to be my role models, my carers, my teachers. Instead they were terrorisers and arrogant abusers of children. All three of them were traumatised ex-soldiers who thought children were lesser beings to be abused at will. All three of them deserved lengthy prison sentences for systematic child abuse.

It made my blood boil when I heard the government talking about bringing ex-soldiers back into the classroom to restore discipline. Yes, that’s just what we need – a good dose of bullying intimidation. Let’s bring back the cane while we’re at it, and don’t stop there, we can go the whole hog and run a series of approved schools and compulsory conscription. Put the miscreants in stocks and get the whole school to throw rotten fruit at them. That’d bring them back into line.

In my experience classes and individuals have a psychological snapping point. They stand up to the classroom teacher tyrant and take them on. The students challenge the teacher’s power and their perceived right to intimidate. Sometimes this is down out of sheer fury. Sometimes it is a realisation that the bullying teacher is operating on sheer bluff – there is a limit to their power. If a student refuses to be intimidated they are powerless.

I have seen deputy heads in nose to nose confrontations, incensed with fury but having to back down. I have seen classes openly defiant and sneeringly disdainful to the point of complete chaos in the face of extreme threats from a castrated teacher. They become uncontrollable. I have seen individuals caned and leave the room arrogantly laughing and basking in the glory from their fellow students.

There is a limit to the power of intimidation.

There is no limit to the power of love.

The only thing I learnt from my childhood experiences with the education system in which bullying and violence were embedded; boring, repetitive memory retention and endless copying were the methodology, and cold strict discipline and heartless control was the order of the day, was that there had to be a better way.

I was going to prove there was a better way!

It seemed to me that the system was obsessed with control and the destruction of the individual. We were crammed into a routine and made into faceless robots.

As a child I had refused to be a cog in such a vicious, heartless machine.

I had refused to be a clone in a militaristic uniform.

I had refused to be broken by petty rules and systematic intimidation.

I rebelled.

Now my rebellion had made me a Headteacher! There’s irony in that!

I remember Patrick McGoohan bringing out a series called ‘The Prisoner’. I adored it. To this day I have a sticker on my desk that proudly and defiantly states: ‘I am not a number I am a free man.’

In the UK:

In the USA:

 

Caning – a deterrent, a source of great resentment and anger, an inhumane punishment??

Here’s a true story:

I was a young teacher in my second year of teaching. The current Headteacher Mr Walton had decided that the field should be out of bounds. The wet weather had created such muddy conditions that the classrooms and corridors were becoming caked with mud. He informed the staff that anyone walking on the grass would be caned. He was hoping this deterrent would solve the problem.

He hadn’t reckoned with Terry. He was a young student from the new comprehensive intake who had been a problem from the start and was no respecter of rules. Indeed it appeared that Terry regarded rules as a challenge. He earned the respect of his fellow students by flouting rules with blatant disdain.

Terry was the perennial thorn in the side of the school. He was loud, aggressive, rude and surly. He disrupted lessons, picked fights and openly defied everyone and everything.

I was walking down the corridor when I was asked by the Head to assist with the apprehension of young Terry. He had been brought to the Head for flagrantly walking on the grass and when he had ascertained his fate he had promptly got up and run away. This was not playing the game. The Head was used to Grammar School boys. They took their punishment like a man. They didn’t run away!

We went hunting for Terry.

Soon Terry was found. But Terry refused to come quietly and what followed is indelibly imprinted in my mind.

Two burly male teachers marched Terry down the corridor to the Head’s study. Terry was screaming and struggling. When he started kicking out at the two staff two other male staff grabbed his ankles and lifted him off the ground. He was carried headfirst, screaming and writhing along the corridor and he was manhandled into the study. I followed in the wake.

By this time the Head had become angry. His authority had been challenged. What originally was one stripe was now six. He intended to make an example of Terry.

The four male staff had to drag Terry to the desk and physically restrain him by all four limbs; each taking an ankle or wrist and tugging so that Terry was pinned across the desk like a frog awaiting dissection. All the while Terry continued to shriek and struggle to his utmost. He certainly had a florid vocabulary for a thirteen year old.

The Head retreated to the other side of the room and then ran, jumped in the air and brought the cane swishing through the air with all the force he could muster.

Terry screamed and went taut in some great spasm. Then he resumed his struggles in a futile desperate attempt to free himself from the four staff.

The Head repeated this five more times.

At the end of it they let Terry loose and he stood in the doorway with knotted fists and purple face swearing at the six of us.

Some say that caning does no harm. That it is a deterrent. The blood running down Terry’s legs from the split skin on his bum was not the harm. In my opinion the hatred and loathing in his mind were the injuries that would leave the everlasting scars. They wouldn’t heal.

As for deterrence – it was the same string of surly, defiant individuals who were paraded for beatings every week.

In the UK:

In the USA:

 

The Purpose of Education – some thoughts from an ex-headteacher

The Purpose of Education

 

It always seems to me that this is where everyone gets confused. Everyone talks about education as if they are talking about the same thing. They are not.

Politicians rant about league tables and world standing without any understanding of what they are talking about.

Parents send their children apprehensively into the machine with a modicum of hope but no real understanding of what they are hoping for.

Students are consumed by the process without grasping what is actually happening to them.

The measurable outcomes are easy to assess and so are given greater importance. The aspects that are not measurable are sometimes acknowledged but usually taken for granted and brushed aside. You cannot measure happiness, empathy, responsibility and tolerance.

Industry cries out for more and better grist for the mill. We in education are always falling short. The economy requires more fodder. Students become numbers to be crunched, pegs to be slotted, and material to feed the machine of commerce.

 

Most importantly students are people; they should be happy, well adjusted, creative and inspiring citizens who care!

 

There needs to be a national debate.

 

There needs to be an international debate.

 

Everything stems from philosophy.

 

We have to stand back from it so that we can view the edifice of education objectively.

 

What is the purpose of education?

 

This is something that needs looking at from all sides. Out of this debate there must be some consensus and the application of intelligence. We can no longer allow education to be the football of political dogma and vested interest. It has to be based on sound philosophy and placed in the hands of educationalists who know what they are doing.

 

So what needs to be considered? Let us look at education in the widest possible light. By exposing the various philosophies we might explore them better. I do not necessarily agree all these objectives nor do I place them in any order. Indeed I abhor some of them. I merely moot them as considerations in order for us to debate the enormity of this subject. We cannot arrive at consensus without taking into account the full panoply of views. By looking at the monolithic construction that education has become from different angles we might begin to make sense of it.

Here are my views on what various interested parties view as being the fundamental purpose of education:

 

  1. For enjoyment
  2. To prepare students for jobs and careers in the modern world
  3. To prepare students for life in the 21st century
  4. To provide the basic needs for participating in a technological society – reading, writing, arithmetic and computer competency
  5. To assume a place in society as a positive citizen – moral, sexual and political.
  6. To stimulate imagination and creativity
  7. To grade students so that future universities and employers can easily judge their competence
  8. To create a hierarchy of status in society
  9. To provide the skills, verbal and practical, that are required by employers, society and individuals
  10. To broaden the mind and open it up to further understanding
  11. To create wonder and awe.
  12. To understand science and technological advances
  13. To understand history and learn from it so that we do not make the same mistakes
  14. To absorb knowledge so that it can be processed internally and synergistically used to arrive at new understanding
  15. To explore feelings so that emotions can be understood and mastered
  16. To explore love, sex and relationships so that adults and children can have better experiences
  17. To promote the sheer love of a subject
  18. To stimulate intelligence and an inquisitive mind
  19. To satisfy the love of learning
  20. To stimulate the love of reading where-in all human experience, the highest thoughts and aspirations, and our dreams are contained
  21. To foster an appreciation of the arts as the highest, most civilised expression of humanity
  22. To investigate morality so that we might build a better, fairer society
  23. To foster tolerance so that we never experience racism, sexism, religious intolerance, homophobia, war, persecution or slavery again in human history
  24. To socialise people so that they are able to enjoy the company of others from all strata and types of society
  25. To teach teamwork and cooperation, so essential to human achievement
  26. To enable the enjoyment of sport and play in all its varieties
  27. To teach about health and fitness so that we can lead vital pleasurable lives
  28. To foster an appreciation of the pleasures of life – literature, food, wine, theatre, opera, music, drama and good company
  29. To care for the environment so that future generations can enjoy the planet
  30. To consider all the issues that threaten life on this planet: overpopulation, pollution, war, species annihilation, overcrowding, poverty, terrorism, and so on – so that we might find solutions
  31. To consider political systems and analyse their effectiveness so that we might produce better systems.
  32. To objectively look at party politics and understand what different political factions stand for so that we might all be better equipped to function in a true democracy.
  33. To investigate capitalism and the world of big business to better understand how the world is organised and run
  34. To promote empathy, responsibility, tolerance, respect and care
  35. To build self-esteem
  36. To foster alert, lively minds who are optimistic and ready to step forward to push back the frontiers with imagination, creativity and exuberance

 

I am sure there are others to add to this list. Perhaps you could tick the ones you agree with?

 

There are some that I believe have no place in education. I do not believe that religion should be allowed anywhere near young vulnerable minds. There is no room for outmoded, primitive superstition in schools. It should be outlawed.

As for religious schools and the brainwashing of young children I view these as child abuse.

 

Too many minds are stultified by poor education techniques, their imaginations sacrificed on the altar of rote learning for league tables, and their enjoyment strangled.

 

The cleverest boy in my childhood secondary school was a genius. He passed every exam with a clear grade A. He was also a joyless, timid, and boring individual without spark or passion and was unemployable except to stoke the icy furnaces of academia or the depths of library archives. Heaven help us if we churn out such vacuous products of stifling education systems. He was an utter failure.

So that list and more make up the purpose of education. People have differing views. I know what I believe is important and I have heard what varying politicians believe.

It’s time we discussed it openly and fully.

Let the debate begin ……………….. please!!

In the UK:

In the USA:

 

GCSE’s heading down the wrong road.

The first GCSE’s with the new formula results are out.

What a joke!!!

They have, under the guise of making the exams harder, merely taken them back to the 50s. They have filled them with knowledge and made them into a memory test. They have taken out the skills and coursework.

Is this what we really need in the 21st Century? I think not.

the 1950s required people remembered large amounts of knowledge. In the 21st Century all knowledge is there at the flick of a finger. Who needs to memorise everything? Nobody!!

What we need are students who are capable of independent learning, teamwork, lateral thinking, creativity and have a range of skills, not rote memory.

Making the exams into a memory test is backward thinking.

This means that low ability students are going to find the courses too hard, become disaffected and disruptive. Is that what we want? A whole group of students who have no qualifications, low self-esteem and feel they have no future? Plain daft!!

They have changed the grading system from A*-G to 9-1. What on earth is that about?? Stupidly they have even changed it around so that confusingly 9 is the top grade and 1 is the bottom grade. How silly is that? How does that do anything for raising standards??

Grade 9 is an A*. Why can’t they just call it that? Why confuse parents and employers? Sounds to me just like they wanted to confuse people so they could pull the wool over people’s eyes. Plain daft!!!

The GCSE was quite a good qualification. It enabled all levels of ability to gain qualifications commensurate with their ability. In order to really differentiate the top end for colleges and employers all they really needed to do was release the raw marks.

The government knew that the results were going to plummet. They didn’t want that did they? Their answer – reduce the grade boundaries – i.e. fiddle the results. That’s what they done. Magically the results have come out slightly higher than last year!!

This is yet another Tory mess up!! They’ve taken education backwards in order to compete with the ridiculous international PISA tables which are cram courses which drive kids to suicide in Japan, China and Singapore and stifle creativity.

Surely creativity is what Britain has traditionally been best at? Why dump it for a cram course??

We’re heading down the wrong road!!!

What Kids Need For The Future!

Well it is easy to start with what they obviously do not need: they do not need to memorise vast amounts of knowledge. We live in the age of easy access to knowledge.

All knowledge is there at the tip of our fingers (or tongue – just ask Alexa). Our smartphones conjure it out of the air. We have no need to hold it all in our heads.

What we need is understanding, teamwork, curiosity, creativity, self-esteem, industriousness, energy, compassion, drive, lateral thinking, critical thinking, computer skills, personal skills, social skills, flexibility and the ability to motivate ourselves and others.

So why are our schools dumping creativity, group work, investigation and computers in favour of rote memory and crude 1950s examinations?

We can’t conquer the new world with the skills of the old can we? We surely need to lay the foundation for the skills of the future.