The Nobel Peace Prize!

Posted on by Opher

The absurdity of putting nincompoop Trump forward for the Nobel Peace Prize doesn’t bear thinking about. It’s so blatantly ridiculous!

This is the fool who told us he could solve the Ukraine war in 1 day! Yes 1 day! He insisted on it numerous times. This idiot was being totally played by Putin. He actually believed they were friends. He could just ring up, offer him everything he wanted and Putin would stop his aggression.

Well, even though Trump offered Putin everything – recognition of Crimea, four regions of Ukraine making up a third of the country and no to Ukraine joining NATO – Putin just laughed in his face and wanted more.

So much for 1 day!! Trump even went as far to withdraw all arms to Ukraine and publicly humiliate Zelenskii in the White House. Even that didn’t work. He even swallowed Putin’s version of events claiming that somehow Zelenskii was to blame for Russia invading his country. Madness.

Putin saw Trump as a gullible, ignorant, stupid clown. He saw the offers as weakness. He pounded Ukraine even more.

By the time the stupid imbecile recognised that Putin was actually a war criminal who was cynically expanding his reach and had designs on other sovereign states, it was too late. He’d played his hand and failed.

Putin was no friend and not to be trusted. Too late.

Trump’s infantile adoration of hard-line authoritarian tyrants (like Putin, Jung Un, Bolsonaro, Orban and other far-right despots) shows a weakness in his own psyche.

So the war rages and Trump has merely enflamed it.

Then we have Israel and the Palestinians. Instead of remaining neutral and mediating Trump came all hard-line, dick swinging (in a tiny arc) and sided with the extremist far-right Israelis and the war criminal Netanyahu. He encouraged them to go for it and they pounded the hell out of Gaza with complete abandon. Condoned by the USA they bombed hospitals, schools, blew up all the houses, hounded the population from one end of Gaza to the other, cut off their food and water, blew up women and children and shot innocents queuing for food. Trump actively supported genocide of the Palestinians.

Then, having scuppered the Obama agreement with Iran that would have put a stop to their nuclear programme with regular inspections, he went and bombed them and threatened them.

This warmonger, supporter of war criminals and tyrants has created more violence than anybody else.

Now this rapist, accused paedophile, convicted felon is being put forward by a wanted war criminal for the Nobel Peace Prize. Unbelievable!!

372 thoughts on “The Nobel Peace Prize!”

  2. Everyone’s making memes, but facts matter too.
    Trump did push some peace deals like the Abraham Accords, but his overall record is mixed — diplomacy on one side, chaos on the other.
    Before calling it a “Nobel-worthy” moment, maybe read the full story here 👉

    worldtacticss.com/trumps-nobel-peace-prize-drama

    Reply

  3. As of January 2026, it has been observed that many residents of Gaza, including members of Hamas, are continuing to distribute candies and sweets to commemorate October 7, 2023. Both Hamas and the UN still rejoice in the Oct 7th Abomination War. The United Nations has formally condemned Israeli actions following the events of October 7, 2023.

    Reply

    1. Of course the UN, like all sane, intelligent, humane human beings condemns the war crimes and genocide committed by Israel. What civilised person wouldn’t? It’s similar to condemning the Nazi death camps. War crimes and genocide need condemning. That does not mean that they support the equally obnoxious atrocities carried out by Hamas. Get a grip Moshe.

      Reply

      1. LOL – apply the metaphor of sane, intelligent, humane etc to the UN butt-hole. What a joke? Surprise Surprise Surprise coming from you —– NOT.

      2. A person who supports racism, genocide and war crimes obviously would not like a universal peace organisation.

      3. A person who “assumes” “itself” as worthy of being “Judge Jury and Executioner” who loves the genocide slander like the medieval Xtians loved their “blood libel & host desecration” slanders … “obviously would not like a universal peace organisation.” LOL

        Joker fool never existed “peace” on the Planet Earth since the establishment of the UN on October 24, 1945.

      4. Quite true. There has never been peace throughout. What we have to ensure, in order to keep stability and reduce the amount of war, is that war criminals are held in check by the law and meet justice. I wait for the day when Netanyahu, Putin and Trump are brought before the courts and sentenced.

      6. All war is a travesty. You’re being selective. Iran, Somalia, Gaza, Congo, Ukraine and the rest! All shit!

      19. A classic example of how MSM perverts and promotes a skewed narrative.

        Christianity and Islam: Both religions have experienced periods of expansion and conflict. Historically, the spread of Christianity and Islam involved military conquests, colonization, and significant violence, often resulting in substantial loss of life. The Crusades (11th to 13th centuries) are a prime example where Christian forces engaged in violent campaigns to reclaim the Holy Land from Muslim control, resulting in extensive casualties. The early Islamic conquests (7th to 9th centuries) also resulted in substantial territorial expansion, often accompanied by military action and suppression of local populations.

        The British Empire serves as a pertinent example of how these dynamics played out, particularly in relation to the spread of Christianity and the resulting violence. The British Empire, while primarily driven by economic interests, often employed the spread of Christianity as a justification for colonization. This included missionary activities that aimed to convert indigenous populations in regions like India, Africa, and the Pacific Islands.

        The introduction of Western religious values frequently accompanied violent suppression of local religions and cultures. India: The British colonial rule led to significant social upheaval, with movements such as the Sepoy Mutiny (1857) in part a response to the imposition of Christianity and Western values. Africa: Missionary efforts were often coupled with military conquests, leading to conflicts with local tribes and cultures. Pacific Islands: The arrival of missionaries frequently preceded colonial annexation, often resulting in the eradication of local beliefs and practices through coercive means.

        The Boer War (1899-1902) between the British Empire and the two Boer republics in South Africa demonstrated the violent outcomes of colonial ambition. As Britain sought control over the resource-rich region, it led to brutal military engagements. The use of concentration camps during the Boer War to manage Boer civilians resulted in significant suffering and loss of life. This method of containment and control foreshadowed similar tactics employed by the Nazis during the Holocaust, illustrating a disturbing legacy of colonial practices.

        The spread of Christianity served dual purposes: to justify imperial conquest and to promote a moral narrative of “civilizing” missions. This often masked the violence and exploitation that accompanied colonial rule. The legacy of these actions remains a source of deep-seated tension and conflict in post-colonial societies. The historical narratives surrounding these expansions lead to ongoing debates about cultural identity, restitution, and the enduring impacts of colonial violence.

        Christianity and Islam have driven human slaughter through their historical expansions, the British Empire’s experience illustrates how imperialism, using religion as a tool for justification, resulted in widespread violence and oppression. These complexities highlight the multifaceted nature of religious influence in human history, necessitating a nuanced understanding of how faith, imperial ambition, and conflict are interwoven. Recognizing these complexities is essential in contextualizing contemporary discussions around religion, politics, and cultural identity.

      21. Contrast the avoda zara philosophy promoted by Maharishi from the sealed masoret of T’NaCH, Talmud, and Siddur

        Maharishi Mahesh Yogi (1918–2008) is best known for developing Transcendental Meditation (TM) and for his broader philosophies surrounding consciousness, meditation, and personal development. His teachings blend Eastern spiritual traditions with modern scientific insights, emphasizing the potential for personal and collective transformation through meditation.

        Transcendental Meditation (TM), a simple technique where individuals meditate for about 20 minutes twice a day, focusing on a specific mantra. The practice aims to promote relaxation, reduce stress, and enhance overall well-being. Maharishi’s philosophy posits that there are different levels of consciousness, ranging from the individual ego to universal consciousness. Achieving higher states of consciousness is seen as vital for personal growth and societal harmony.

        A significant aspect of his philosophy is the idea that individual well-being contributes to global peace. Maharishi advocated for group meditation initiatives, suggesting that collective practices could foster a more peaceful world. The heart of Maharishi’s teachings lies in the practice of TM, helping individuals achieve depth of consciousness and inner silence. Maharishi integrated Ayurvedic principles into his teachings, emphasizing natural health and the balance between body, mind, and spirit. He developed programs focused on stress reduction, creativity enhancement, and improved quality of life through meditation.

        Maharishi’s Concept: The text outlines two realities: the “Absolute,” which is unchanging, and the “relative,” which is ever-changing. This duality is central to understanding life and consciousness. T’NaCH: In Judaism, God is often described as unchanging (Malachi 3:6: “For I, the Lord, do not change”). However this minor prophet contrasts with the day and night change between God in Heaven as depicted in the Book of בראשית, to the God within our hearts – revelation of HaShem at Sinai.

        The Talmud encompasses the “world view” model of Sanhedrin common law courtrooms. Case/Din halacha serves as בניני אבות judicial precedents wherein the Gemara sugyot interpret and re-interpret different perspectives how to both understand the language of a sugya of Gemara; but most essentially to make, so to speak, a legislative review/משנה תורה-multiple different perspective analysis of the witness language of a specific Mishna.

        The Maharishi’s concept of “Being”, for example, fails to address the ever present crisis of Jewish assimilation and intermarriage with Goyim who reject the revelation of the Torah at Sinai – HaShem לא בשמים היא – a D’varim vision that Torah does not come from heaven. A Talmudic example found in ברכות which presents an Aggadic story of a man who sleeps in a grave yard and told that Man can only do mitzvot in this world and not in the world to come. Meaning doing time-oriented commandments with the k’vanna לשמה fundamentally and absolutely requires a Yatzir Ha-Tov spirit which breathes tohor Oral Torah middot within the beating heart of a bnai brit Man living in this world.

        The Talmud emphasizes the distinction between tefillah and prayer – comparable to the Divine Names whereby the Avot perceived God in the Heavens above as opposed to the post Sinai root faith that HaShem’s Divine Presence Shekinah breaths tohor middot within the Yatzir Ha-Tov within our hearts on this physical Earth below. Hence its directly pronounce the Name of HaShem because this living spirit Name simply no more a word than its possible to compare anything in the Heavens, Seas, or Earth to HaShem.

        Contrast the false Maharishi’s concept — his projected ability of individual beings to reflect the “Absolute”, this total narishkeit nonsense declares the notion of expanding mind and heart through awareness and harmony with universal being. This contrasts with HaShem understood in the Talmud as a local god which only the 12 tribes of Israel accepted at Sinai with the Universal Monotheistic theological rhetoric promoted by both Xtianity and Islam’s Universal Monotheistic God(s).

        The Maharishi’s religious rhetoric narishkeit promotes mystical kabbalah excuses! His “Kabbalistic perspective” describes the process of personal and collective consciousness expanding as one engages more deeply with divine truth. Torah by contrast defines faith as צדק צדק תרדוף – pursue judicial common law justice in this world – specifically within the brit lands sworn as the eternal inheritance of the Avot chosen Cohen seed within only the borders of Judea. Sanhedrin Courts with their prophetic police mussar enforcers only have jurisdiction within the borders of Judea. Yonah being an exception due to the king of Assyria made a mass deportation of the people of the kingdom of Samaria deported to Assyrian lands by force.

        T’shuva refers to b’nai brit remembering the sworn oath made unto the Avot that they would father the chosen Cohen people. After Yonah traveled to the kingdom of Assyria – the Babylonian empire conquered that kingdom shortly thereafter. Prophets never sent to Goyim who never accepted the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. Contrast the Koran where it declares that prophets sent to all nations and lands to warn of approaching societal collapse; where those “prophets” speak in the native language of the people being warned! Goyim in all times and generations never accepted the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. Prophets command mussar only to the chosen Cohen people who accept the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. Hence the Koran, like the New Testament – both Av tuma avoda zara.

      23. Trump leadership stands tall.

        In 2026, Donald Trump revisited his interest in Greenland, which is an autonomous territory of Denmark. Previously, in 2019, he proposed purchasing Greenland, a suggestion that was met with resistance from not just Denmark but also the global community. At the World Economic Forum in January 2026, Trump and NATO officials discussed a framework for a future deal regarding Greenland. This did not imply ownership transfer, but rather a cooperative framework addressing security and potential military bases.

        The framework aims to allow the U.S. to build additional military bases on Greenland for missile defense purposes, particularly in line with Trump’s “Golden Dome” project. The U.S. seeks access to mineral rights, particularly for rare earth minerals, which are essential for technology and defense sectors. Danish sovereignty over Greenland remains intact, as emphasized by Danish officials who insist on the respect of the self-determination of Greenland’s people.

        Trump has backed down from threats to impose tariffs on European countries opposing his Greenland proposal, indicating a softening of his stance to mend transatlantic relations. The framework introduced at Davos is more about strengthening cooperative security measures in the Arctic region rather than an outright sale or transfer of sovereignty over Greenland. The situation as a potential “squirrel” tactic for deflecting main stream media propaganda anti Trump rhetoric or as a maximalist demand for negotiation appears to hold merit, given the context of Trump’s approach and the complexities surrounding the territory’s status. Based upon the recent developments which reveal a diplomatic approach focusing on security collaboration and resource sharing, rather than a unilateral demand for territorial ownership.

        This framework signifies a focus on enhancing security measures in the Arctic rather than asserting territorial claims. The ongoing dialogue suggests a diplomatic path centered on security collaboration and resource sharing rather than unilateral demands for ownership.

        This Greenland “art of the deal” possibly linked to broader geopolitical strategies, including challenges posed by BRICS nations to the U.S. dollar’s dominance. The Greenland deal primarily revolves around security collaboration between the U.S. and Denmark, particularly concerning military bases and resource access. The BRICS nations (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) have been increasingly vocal about reducing their dependency on the U.S. dollar for international trade.

        Establishing military bases in Greenland could enhance U.S. capabilities in the Arctic, potentially countering Russian influence and securing key shipping routes, which is critical amidst rising geopolitical tensions related to BRICS. Access to Greenland’s resources, including its rare earth minerals, could bolster U.S. supply chains that are crucial in maintaining technological and military superiority. Strengthening U.S. positions globally (like in Greenland) may serve as a counterweight to any moves by BRICS to establish a currency that could undermine the dollar, reinforcing U.S. economic interests.

        Greenland’s strategic importance is connected to U.S. interests in Venezuela, particularly regarding oil reserves, involves several key geopolitical factors. As an autonomous territory of Denmark, Greenland’s geographic location in the Arctic is strategically vital for U.S. military operations, especially in countering rival influences from Russia and China. Venezuela is home to some of the largest oil reserves in the world, making it a significant player in global energy dynamics. The capture of Venezuelan leadership by U.S. interests could be seen as a move to secure energy supplies while simultaneously diminishing the influence of countries like Russia and China that have vested interests in Venezuela.

        While the direct links between Greenland’s status and the U.S. strategy toward Venezuela may not be immediately apparent, both are part of a larger framework of U.S. geopolitical maneuvers aimed at securing strategic resources and asserting influence in key regions. The dynamics of securing energy resources from Venezuela and ensuring military readiness in Greenland illustrate the interconnected nature of global political and economic strategies. This multifaceted approach highlights how countries navigate complex international landscapes to protect their interests.

      24. Trump is an imbecile arsehole who is making the world much more dangerous and expensive for us all. Just because he supports your war criminal genocide does not mean he should be praised. He’s a war criminal too!

      26. No. My opinion is based on reason and observation. I’m not a fascist Nazi. I don’t like despots or genocide.

      28. That seems to be the latest fashion – Fascist Nazis – like Trump and Netanyahu – calling out sane people who want peace and equality. Your racism and support of genocide stinks.

      35. A classic example of how MSM perverts and promotes a skewed narrative.

        Christianity and Islam: Both religions have experienced periods of expansion and conflict. Historically, the spread of Christianity and Islam involved military conquests, colonization, and significant violence, often resulting in substantial loss of life. The Crusades (11th to 13th centuries) are a prime example where Christian forces engaged in violent campaigns to reclaim the Holy Land from Muslim control, resulting in extensive casualties. The early Islamic conquests (7th to 9th centuries) also resulted in substantial territorial expansion, often accompanied by military action and suppression of local populations.

        The British Empire serves as a pertinent example of how these dynamics played out, particularly in relation to the spread of Christianity and the resulting violence. The British Empire, while primarily driven by economic interests, often employed the spread of Christianity as a justification for colonization. This included missionary activities that aimed to convert indigenous populations in regions like India, Africa, and the Pacific Islands.

        The introduction of Western religious values frequently accompanied violent suppression of local religions and cultures. India: The British colonial rule led to significant social upheaval, with movements such as the Sepoy Mutiny (1857) in part a response to the imposition of Christianity and Western values. Africa: Missionary efforts were often coupled with military conquests, leading to conflicts with local tribes and cultures. Pacific Islands: The arrival of missionaries frequently preceded colonial annexation, often resulting in the eradication of local beliefs and practices through coercive means.

        The Boer War (1899-1902) between the British Empire and the two Boer republics in South Africa demonstrated the violent outcomes of colonial ambition. As Britain sought control over the resource-rich region, it led to brutal military engagements. The use of concentration camps during the Boer War to manage Boer civilians resulted in significant suffering and loss of life. This method of containment and control foreshadowed similar tactics employed by the Nazis during the Holocaust, illustrating a disturbing legacy of colonial practices.

        The spread of Christianity served dual purposes: to justify imperial conquest and to promote a moral narrative of “civilizing” missions. This often masked the violence and exploitation that accompanied colonial rule. The legacy of these actions remains a source of deep-seated tension and conflict in post-colonial societies. The historical narratives surrounding these expansions lead to ongoing debates about cultural identity, restitution, and the enduring impacts of colonial violence.

        Christianity and Islam have driven human slaughter through their historical expansions, the British Empire’s experience illustrates how imperialism, using religion as a tool for justification, resulted in widespread violence and oppression. These complexities highlight the multifaceted nature of religious influence in human history, necessitating a nuanced understanding of how faith, imperial ambition, and conflict are interwoven. Recognizing these complexities is essential in contextualizing contemporary discussions around religion, politics, and cultural identity.

      37. A comprehensive Jewish polemic against the theological foundations of Xtianity and Islam. Where was JeZeus throughout the Shoah? Where was Allah throughout the Nakba total defeat disasters of ’48, ’67, & most recently the 12 Day War?

        Explain how the local tribal god of Sinai who dwells in the Mishkan Yatzir Ha-Tov/strictly and only within the hearts of the chosen Cohen seed of Avraham, Yitzak, and Yaacov – upon this Earth, does eternally judge the Monotheistic Universal Gods of Golgotha (place of the skull) and Mecca & Medina who occupy the Heavens – as false Baal Gods of Av Tuma avoda zarah – no different from the Gods worshipped by Par’o and Egypt or the Gods worshipped by the Canaanites.

        The Torah’s God is not a distant “universal father” but the local, tribal Elohim of Sinai, who entered history through the brit cut between the pieces with Avraham, promising land and seed to Israel alone. This God judges all nations but resides only in the mishkan (tabernacle) of Jewish hearts committed to tohorah and tzedek (justice). Monotheism’s universalism profanes this faith that pursues justice within the borders of the oath brit lands, by inventing heavenly overlords who demand submission from all humanity, violating the Second Commandment: “You shall have no other gods before Me”, which explicitly condemns the polytheistic undertones of trinitarian Christianity and the absolutist Allah of Islam as echoes of Ba’al worship—gods of storm, fertility, or conquest that promise salvation but deliver tumah.

        JeZeus as a Protocols of the Elders of Zion NT blood libel slander, did not know the fundamental distinction which separates Torah common law from Roman Statute Law. Likewise his similar Nathan of Gaza who served as the disciple of Shabbetai Tzvi … commonly known in NT rhetoric propaganda as “the Apostle Paul”. To sanctify the mitzva of shabbat (all Torah commandments apply equally to all chosen Cohen seed of the Avot – including the mitzva of Moshiach) requires making the הבדלה distinction between time-oriented Av commandments from toldot positive & negative commandments which do not require k’vanna; this בינה that discerns like from like מלאכה מן עבודה, separates holy from profane – t’ruma from chol. The imaginary man JeZeus did not “understand” the mitzva of shabbat any more than do Xtians understand the mitzva of Moshiach or Muslims understand the mitzva of Torah prophets; Torah prophets command mussar – T’NaCH does not instruct history because prophesy as a mussar rebuke applies equally straight across the board to all generations of the chosen Cohen seed of the Avot, no different than Shabbat and Moshiach.

        The dedication of the House of Aaron as Moshiach serves as the Av precedent for all other Moshiach dedications thereafter. The precedent for korbanot learns from the rejection of Cain’s korban. A Torah korban exists as a time-oriented commandment which requires the “wisdom” of k’vanna-swearing a Torah oath through שם ומלכות. The term מלכות refers to the king-like leadership direction of the 13 tohor Oral Torah spirits which Moshe Rabbeinu perceived at Horev 40 days following the sin of the Golden Calf av definition of all avoda zarah for all generations. The Oral Torah revelation occurred on Yom Kippor wherein HaShem remembered the oaths sworn unto the Avot and annulled the vow to make from Moshe the father for the chosen Cohen people. Just as brit does not translate correctly as covenant, so too and how much more so t’shuva does not correctly translate as repentance for sin. Torah faith does not atone for sin, Yom Kippor makes atonement for a failure to rule the oath sworn lands with righteous judicial common law Sanhedrin justice which makes fair restitution of damages inflicted by bnai brit upon bnai brit. Aaron as the first anointed Moshiach – dedicates through the sanctification of korbanot the righteous pursuit of judicial justice among the chosen Cohen seed of the Avot within the borders of Judea.

        Matthew genealogy traces the lineage of its Harry Potter through Joseph. Luke’s genealogy traces its lineage through Mary. LOL. Matthew lists 42 generations while Luke lists 77 generations! Matthew begins with Avraham and moves forward while Luke begins with Adam. The final name in Matthew’s genealogy Joseph (husband of Mary). While Luke ends with JeZeus. Matthew follows Solomon’s line; Luke follows Nathan’s line. All gospel Roman forgeries fail to grasp the Torah negative commandment of a “bastard child”.

        The gospel of Luke ignores that all Goyim reject to this day the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. No gospel forgery ever once includes the 1st Commandment revelation of HaShem who dwells thereafter only within the Yatzir Ha-Tov of the hearts of the Chosen Cohen seed of Avraham Yitzak and Yaacov – brit cut between the pieces. Nathan, another descendant of David not tied to the kingship.

        Anymore than the gospels has any linkage to the Torah dedication of the mitzva of Moshiach – based upon king David’s failure to judge the Case of Bat Sheva’s husband with justice. Ruling the land/people with righteous judicial justice defines the Torah intent of the mitzva of Moshiach. Luke’s attempt to make its false messiah into an av tuma Universal messiah for all Mankind, violates the revelation of the Torah at Sinai.

        Moshe first anointed the House of Aaron as Moshiach. Aaron stands on the foundation of Elohim acceptance of the sacrifice dedicated by Hevel, despite Cain being born first. This theme duplicated again and again in Yishmael/Yitzak, Esau\Yaacov, Reuven\Yosef, pre-sin of Golden Calf first born of Israel/post Golden Calf tribe of Levi. The Luke/puke contradicts JeZeus’s declaration to the Samaritan woman! Hence the NT compare more to a superman comic book than an actual replacement of the brit chosen Cohen seed of the Avot replaced by a Roman fictional Harry Potter messiah.

        The greatest flaw of the gospel forgeries, hands down without any question, their utter replacement theological failure which fails to grasp that all the Torah mitzvot revealed at Sinai apply equally – straight across the board – like shabbat and tohorat Ha-beit for married women – to all generations of the chosen Cohen seed of Avraham Yitzak and Yaacov.

        Furthermore the JeZeus false messiah failed to differentiate the Avot in Genesis perception of El, Elohim, El Shaddai etc as a God in the Heavens from the revelation of HaShem in the 1st Sinai Commandment wherein the Divine Presence middot revealed to Moshe after the sin of the Golden Calf on Yom Kippur live in this Earth only within the hearts of the Yatzir Ha-Tov Cohen people. When the followers of the Harry Potter false messiah asked their God how to pray he taught them: Our Father who is in Heaven … this fundamentally violates and profanes the revelation of the Torah at Sinai – the Spirits of HaShem live within the Tabernacle of the Yatzir Ha-Tov within the bnai brit Cohen hearts.

        Tefillah – Kre’a Shma – Hear Israel HaShem Elohynu HaShem Echad. The word One does not refer as the av tuma avoda zara theologies promoted by the NT and Koran false prophet frauds of Universal Monotheism. Monotheism violates the 2nd Sinai Commandment; HaShem sent Moshe to Egypt to judge the Gods of Egypt! Rather the word ONE refers to the oath that a Cohen swears through his tefillen to remember the oaths sworn by Avraham Yitzak and Yaacov wherein the Avot cut an oath alliance to father the chosen Cohen people. Hence the 3 Divine Names in this one verse have the intention to remember the oaths the Avot swore to father the chosen Cohen seed for all eternity. Furthermore, the name Elohynu judges and separates HaShem from HaShem; acceptance of the Written and Oral Torah revelation לשמה.

        The father determines the genealogy of both sons of Aaron and Kings of both Yechuda and Israel. The NT fraud has no concept that once a man acquires title to the O’lam Ha’bah (future born children) of his wife, that even if Zeus himself fathered Hercules that under Torah law Hercules constitutes a bastard. That the beating of JeZeus almost to death and torturing him upon a cross compares to offering a deformed animal on an altar as a Torah sacrifice. תורה לא בשמים – a direct quote from the Book of D’varim which defines the revelation of the First Sinai Commandment for all eternity thereafter. JeZeus depicted as the “Son of God/virgin birth” … a bastard child forever excluded כרת from the seed of the Avot chosen Cohen people.

        The brutal murder of fictional Harry Potter JeZeus through judicial corruption and injustice totally the opposite of Moshe dedication of the House of Aaron as Moshiach. The prophet Shmuel first anointed Shaul of the tribe of Binyamin as Moshiach, but his failure to pursue justice – specifically in the mitzva of Amalek (understood as Jewish ערב רב – assimilated Jews who follow foreign cultures & customs who intermarry with Goyim who reject the revelation of the Torah at Sinai.) Amalek or antisemitism plagues all generations of Jews with Torah curses no different than the plague curses in Egypt.

        Superficially Yonah sent to “warn” the king of Assyria. But Torah prophets serve only as the mussar police of Sanhedrin courtroom rulings. The Sanhedrin courts only have jurisdiction within the borders of Judea. Hence for the prophet Yona sent to Assyria his mission replicates that of Moshe in Egypt sent to cause the exiled 10 tribes of Israel to remember the brit oath sworn to the Avot. Assyria conquered shortly after Yonah commanded his mussar to the exiled seed of the 10 Tribes by the Babylonian empire.

        Contrasts the Torah’s depth with the superficial, treif distortions peddled by the church—as epitomized in that 1956 Hollywood spectacle, The Ten Commandments, where a bald Yul Brynner as Pharaoh and a chiseled Charlton Heston as Moshe reduce Sinai to a cinematic farce. The revelation of the Torah at Sinai caused Israel to recoil after hearing only the first two dibrot (statements) directly from HaShem’s tohor spirits.

        Understanding why the aseret ha-dibrot (the “Ten Statements,” not “Commandments” as the church mistranslates to fit its legalistic idolatry) appear twice. Israel demanded thereafter that Moshe ascend to receive the remainder of the Torah—Written and Oral—lest these tohor middot consume their Yatzir Ha-Raw tuma middot.

        The aseret ha-dibrot repeated twice in the Torah, this duplication, it exposes the root of Torah common law; which stands firmly upon bininei avot—the foundational “building fathers” or precedents that generate an expansive edifice of halachah. As enslaved Israel made bricks to build Egyptian treasure cities, the Talmud employs the building block of Hillel’s 7 middot, Akiva’s 10 middot, Yishmael’s 13 middot, and HaGallilee’s 32 middot; every sugya of Gemara stands upon these יסודי logical building blocks.

        These are not mere repetitions for emphasis, as Goyim theologians defame the Talmud as the words of Men, far removed from the Word of God! Rather the concept of T’NaCH prophetic Oral Torah mussar middot and Talmudic halachic middot bridge the gap of holiness which elevates holy to most holy commandments. Shabbat serves as an Av precedent for all other wisdom-commandments which require k’vanna wherein Jews in all generations dedicates tohor Oral Torah middot – which the Talmud calls: מלכות. As the Torah has two grades of commandments the T’NaCH & Talmud judicial common law have two grades of middot.

        Torah speaks in the language of Man. The kabbalistic term “shekinah” stands upon the Mishkan precedent. Its not the form of the Mishkan and its vessels which defines the revelation of the Torah at Sinai/Horev; anymore than its the 6 days of Creation משל, but rather the introduction of time oriented commandments נמשל. The נמשל that the רוח הקדוש Oral Torah middot of Horev breath life into the Ya’tzir Ha-Tov of the Chosen Cohen peoples’ hearts. Hence the error spelling of the word heart as לבב in the tefillah דאורייתא acceptance of the yoke of the “kingdom of heaven”.

        Meaning remembering the oath sworn by the Avot to father the Chosen Cohen people and the acceptance of the Written and Oral Torahs at Sinai and Horev. Herein designates the k’vanna of the time-oriented wisdom commandment known as קריא שמע. As this commandment applies to all generations of Israel so too the mitzva of Moshiach. Jews do not wait for a fabled 2nd coming of JeZeus. “Time” not as literal hours but as opportune wisdom (as in Ecclesiastes 3:1–8’s “a time for every matter”). Thus the repetition of the 10 dibrot serve to define the elevation of time-oriented commandments as the k’vanna to remember the redemption from Egyptian exile – as expressed in the first Sinai t’shuva commandment.

        The revelation of the Oral Torah, according to the kabbalah taught by rabbi Akiva’s פרדס understanding, reveals a dynamic logic variable inductive format, as opposed to the ancient Greek philosophers static rigid syllogism deductive logic. Islam’s sharia mimics toldot without av wisdom, leading to rigid fatawa absent prophetic t’shuva. In essence, the twice-repeated 10 dibrot reveal the Torah’s blueprint for common law: a beniyan av teaching generational renewal, mitzvah classification, and mussar-k’vanna. This stands eternally against the church’s movie myths and Islam’s static codes, affirming Sinai’s wisdom for Israel’s seed alone.

      42. An addition to the previous — A comprehensive Jewish polemic against the theological foundations of Xtianity and Islam. Where was JeZeus throughout the Shoah? Where was Allah throughout the Nakba total defeat disasters of ’48, ’67, & most recently the 12 Day War?

        1. Peter claims that through JeZeus, significant miracles occur, thereby validating the role of this imaginary man as a miracle worker and messianic figure… this serves as zero proof of the mitzva of Moshiach according to the Torah. Moshiach based upon King Shaul and David and all the kings of Yechuda and Israel thereafter has nothing to do with healing miracle workers as the definition of the Torah mitzva of Moshiach.

        of the chosen Cohen people through tohor middot spirits. Hence the p’suk: שמות: כה:ח — ועשו לי מקדש ושכנתי בתוכם — prioritizes the vision that HaShem through the revelation of Oral Torah tohor middot quickens the Yatzir Ha-Tov with life through all the generations of Israel upon this Earth. This vision has nothing to do with the NT “salvation from sin” substitute theology.

        The NT fails to address the central act of rebellion when Israel demanded from the prophet Shmuel a king, when HaShem through the Sinai brit ruled as KING. Recall that Israel requested a king to lead the nation to fight its wars. The bait N’ switch to the topic of “salvation” therefore exists as classic substitute theology. Revisionist history defines the NT like Holocaust Denial defines modern anti-Semitism. Specifically, the NT introduces a theology of a Universal God. This alien foreign idea has nothing to do with the Sinai revelation because Goyim rejected the Torah and do not accept the Torah to this very day.

        The deliverance from Egyptian bondage and conquering of Canaan – these fundamental “miracles” serve as the basis for Israel to rule conquered Canaan with justice as a total repudiation of Par’o judicial injustice to Israel. Torah prophesy centers upon mussar rebukes which all generations can grow as their own ideas sprouting from within their Yatzir Ha-Tov spirits breathing within their hearts. The NT shares no connection whatsoever toward achieving the justice leadership of HaShem in this world through the Torah mandate of Federal Sanhedrin common law courtrooms.

        Both the NT and Koran attempt to replace the oath brit which defines Torah as the Written Constitution of the Cohen Republic. They both attempt to establish a theological backdrop wherein Torah prophesy applies to all Goyim Universally. These attempts reject the revelation of the Torah at Sinai but seek thereafter to worship their Name God replacements as substitutes for HaShem taking Israel alone out of Egypt. Such theological revisionist history substitutes other Universal Gods for the local god which only Israel accepted at Sinai. Miraculous miracle workers do not replace the prophetic mussar visions established through the T’NaCH literature which the NT attempts to replace with the label “Old Testament”.

        Declaring the ‘Good News’ of the Name of JeZeus has no T’NaCH precedent. Torah a common law legality which stands upon the foundation of precedents. No courtroom objectively examines (prosecutor vs. defense legal briefs) any courtroom case based upon the “Name of JeZeus”. Hence the challenge to Judicial common law courtroom practices – simply a red herring. The Written Torah serve the chief function as the Constitution of the Republic of Judea which mandates Sanhedrin common law courtrooms. No different than the US Constitution mandates 3 branches of Government. By emphasizing the miraculous events attributed to JeZeus as the Son of God, this substitute theology replaces oath brit cut with Avraham Yitzak and Yaacov to father the chosen Cohen people.

        The Written Torah serves as the legal constitution for the Jewish people, establishing a system grounded in established precedents and judicial proceedings. The NT does not provide this framework or engage with it meaningfully. Most significantly: the NT emphasis upon the Divine Name of JeZeus worships a new God which the Avot did not know.

        The Written Torah functions analogously to a constitution, establishing a system of laws that courts operate upon, thus framing the concept of justice within a concrete legal structure. The absence of any NT precedent in this regard significantly undermines its claims. The NT pivot to a new Universal Trinity God contradicts the specific oath britot cut through the Torah alliance established by Avraham Yitzak and Yaacov.

        Miracles as “signs” do not prove or disprove the mitzva of Moshiach. Moshe anointed Aaron as Moshiach. Aaron dedicated korbanot/sacrifices NOT as some Cain-like “Barbeque to Heaven”, but rather based upon the k’vanna of Hevel whose korban dedicated the sanctification through swearing an oath to pursue justice in this world. Justice: defined through both T’NaCH & Talmudic common law – as the legal pursuit of justice/fair compensation of damages as the intent of the Torah commandment: “Eye for an Eye and tooth for a tooth”. Legal judicial justice rejects as טיפש פשט-utter bird brained stupidity-any literal reading for “Eye for an Eye”! The sacrifices are not simply ritualistic acts. They are deeply intertwined with the intent (k’vanna) to pursue justice and right wrongs, differentiating them from mere offerings. This highlights a legal and ethical framework wherein Moshe first anointed the House of Aaron as Moshiach; it explains the connection between the revelation of the Mishkan with the pursuit of judicial justice through logically juxtaposing the Torah mitzva of sacrifices against the Torah mitzva to pursue justice.

        The understanding of korbanot not as mere rituals but as essential acts tied to the pursuit of justice brings a critical perspective on their religious significance. The intentionality behind these actions (k’vanna) focuses on justice and ethical behavior which has nothing to do with the NT “forgiveness of sin as the salvation of Mankind”.

      46. Your opening sentence – utter ball sucking bull shit. When are you going to stop war crimes and start making peace? Dumb ass coward hypocrite bull shit stupid mother fucker.

      47. Yes, I can see that would be an anathema to a violent, racist fascist. You just want to eradicate all people who don’t live or think like you. You think you have some god-given right to land and are superior to the Arabs that you are historically genetically linked to.

      51. Israel’s genocide of Palestinians in Gaza continues. Over 70,000 Palestinians have now been killed, including over 480 since the ‘ceasefire’ began. More than 2,700 families have been completely eradicated in Gaza.

        Israel’s illegal blockade of Gaza continues – less than half of the promised food, medicine and shelter is entering. Children are dying of hypothermia.

        Israel is still detaining over 10,000 Palestinians, many without charge, while all Israeli captives have been returned. Israel is systematically torturing Palestinian detainees, some to death, without consequence. At least 84 Palestinian prisoners have died in Israeli prisons since October 2023.
        You justify all this!

      53. Israeli state-backed settlers attack Palestinians every day.

        The last remaining Palestinian families in Ras Eni al-Auja in the Jordan Valley were ethnically cleansed by Israel – this is the 45th community in the West Bank to be forced out since 2023.

        Israel demolished the UN relief agency for Palestinians (UNRWA) headquarters in East Jerusalem – while further destroying UN refugee camps and forcibly displacing thousands of Palestinian families.

      55. Torah mitzvot shaped and determined through Sanhedrin common law lateral courtrooms בלבד. The Torah’s system of mitzvot—both d’oraita and d’rabbanan—finds its authoritative determination exclusively through the lateral common law deliberations of the Sanhedrin. Torah common law never exists as statute law as expressed through independent legislators annulling or innovating mitzvot outside courtroom jurisdiction.

        The rejection of bat kol in mesechta Bava Metzia 59b (the tanur shel Akhnai) crystallizes this: “Lo ba-shamayim hi” (Devarim 30:12) means post-Sinai, halacha follows majority human reasoning in beit din, not heavenly voices or charismatic claims. Prophets courtroom justice enforcers independently enforce or rebuke. They do not legislate or override courts of Sanhedrin Common law.

        Acts 16:16-40 Necromancy = seeking authority, knowledge, or salvation from the dead. If a human who died becomes: prayed to; invoked; obeyed; trusted over Torah law — then functionally, it is דורש אל המתים, regardless of metaphysical claims. The NT’s moshiach narrative, ignores the core: Leading in “war” (crises) to uphold courtroom restitution (e.g., Sanhedrin as nimshal to Beit HaMikdash’s mashal).

        The Torah Law mitzva of Moshiach, this mitzva applies equally to all Jews in all generations. The Torah mitzva of Moshiach exists as an expression of a servant, like Moshe and all the NaCH prophets, of Torah common law court police enforcers. The Book of Shmuel does not make king David into a theological belief system ‘new covenant’ God. Mesechta Baba Metzia :נט reject the authority of a בת קול voice from heaven as having any judicial authority on this Earth.

        Acts 16:16–18 is not a neutral miracle story. It is a classic confrontation between Torah-prohibited practices and a pagan economic system. Encounter with the Slave Girl (Verses 16-18)/witch. The girl is explicitly described as having a πνεῦμα πύθωνα — a Python spirit, tied in Greek culture to Delphi, Apollo, and divination.

        The act of Paul commanding the spirit to depart from the girl in Acts 16 can spark discussions about necromancy, witchcraft, and the broader context of spiritual authority. The accusation against Paul and Silas reflects a significant cultural conflict. They were promoting a different way of life that challenged local practices, including those tied to economic interests. The girl’s ability to tell fortunes, considered a source of income for her owners, was rooted in practices the Jewish Torah condemned.

        This maps cleanly onto אוב וידעוני in Torah language (Devarim 18). Paul’s act is not prophetic justice. But rather an extrajudicial charismatic intervention, devoid of Sanhedrin authority, witnesses, or jurisdiction. This prophetic mussar interprets this av tuma story as an unlicensed manipulation of spiritual forces outside of Torah courtroom common law. As such this NT story more counter-witchcraft rather than prophetic mussar which the Torah commands.

        The concept of resurrection in Xtianity indeed provokes a variety of interpretations and discussions, especially when viewed in the context of the Hebrew Scriptures (Torah) and traditional Jewish beliefs. The Torah does not explicitly describe resurrection in the way that later Xtian dogmatism does. There are sections of T’NaCH משל and Aggadic/Midrashic examination of the mystic work of the Book of Daniel 12:2 (Many of those who sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake, some to everlasting life, and some to reproaches, to everlasting abhorrence”) – often read midrashically or kabbalistically through halachic lenses. However this סוד kabbalah interpreted through the lenses of halacha, defines how פרדס רמז\סוד weave together as warp vs. weft threads of a Talmudic loom which defines the cultures and customs practiced by the chosen Cohen people alone.

        2 Kings 2:11 Elijah is described as being taken up to heaven without dying – illustrates a different understanding of life after death compared to the resurrection concept presented in Xtianity. 2 Kings 2:11, Eliyahu does not die. No burial, no resurrection, no glorified corpse. Eliyahu – removed from the human legal domain, not elevated into divine mediation. Eliyahu returns as messenger, not object of worship. He resolves ספקות, restores halachic clarity. He never annuls mitzvot or introduces new covenants. Malachi 3:23-24 and Sanhedrin 98a Elijah restores clarity to mitzvot, not annuls them.

        Elijah’s experience does not support the Xtian dogma of resurrection but rather suggests other forms of divine interaction with humanity. Xtian dogma of resurrection seen as establishing a ‘new covenant’ between God in Heaven and humanity. This off the path redefinition life, death, and the divine relationship negates the revelation of the tohor spirits of HaShem’s 13 middot living within the Yatzir Ha’Tov of the chosen Cohen people.

        Necromancy traditionally involves summoning the dead for knowledge or power. If one views calling upon JeZeus—who is believed to have risen from the dead—as a form of necromancy, it presents a complex interpretation that challenges conventional understandings. Within Xtian theology, Jesus is not viewed merely as a deceased figure but as the risen Savior who transcends death. This fundamental belief shifts the interaction from necromancy to communion with the living God; a direct violation of the 1st and 2nd Sinai commandments!

        The Xtian ‘New Covenant’ belief in JeZeus’ resurrection – central to Xtian Av tuma false messiah avoda zara which introduces the dogma that JeZeus overcame death and now lives in a glorified state in the Heavens with his Father. This abomination negates: D’varim: לא בשמים היא. The Xtian resurrection witchcraft later spawned Muhammad the false prophet’s 72 virgin theological narishkeit. The prophetic mussar which forbade king David to build the Beit HaMikdash likewise corrupted by inept טיפש פשט Am ha’aretz stupidity.

        Unlike Rambam (Maimonides), who emphasized spiritual immortality in the world to come and interpreted resurrection more cautiously (in his Iggeret Techiyat ha-Metim defending its literalness but subordinating it to intellectual reward), Ramban stresses a more physical, embodied afterlife. He critiques overly spiritualized views, insisting the verse “admits of no other interpretation” than literal resurrection (echoing Rambam’s own defense in his Treatise on Resurrection, though Ramban expands on the mechanics). The mitzva of Moshiach clarifies halacha based upon the precedent of Eliyahu who does the same. The Ramban grounds the סוד concept of resurrection firmly in Torah tradition; it serves divine justice, rewards the righteous (tzaddikim/maskilim who shine like stars, per v. 3), and upholds the 13 middot through tohor judgment—resurrection simply not anything approaching the NT metaphysical elevation of man into God, bypassing halachic courts or Torah observance.

        The Torah mitzva of Moshiach stands upon the Torah precedent of Moshe anointing the House of Aaron as Moshiach – dedicated to drive, lead, guide Israel in a korban like dedication to actively pursue righteous justice among our conflicting peoples within the borders of the oath sworn lands. Just as a koran limited to the confined jurisdiction of the Mishkan so too and how much more so Sanhedrin common law courts, together with their prophetic enforcement police – limited strictly and only to operate within the borders of Judea alone.

        The theological narratives surrounding JeZeus and Muhammad illustrate the complexities of Torah judicial justice as faith apart from the menstrual blood tuma beliefs, and avoda zara spirituality which define the cultures customs and practices developed by European, Arab & Muslim cultures. These Roman and Arab religions share no common ground with Israel brought out of Egypt to conquer Canaan to rule that land with judicial common law justice.

        2 Samuel 11-12 David’s moral failure to judge Uriah the baal of Bat Sheva with justice. David’s attempt to cover up his implied adultery (the Talmud refutes this charge) by recalling Uria from battle – in the hope that he would have relations with his wife forced David to make a far more radical solution to his problem. The concealment of Uriah’s death as a consequence of war – herein defines the language “blood on his hands” by the prophet Natan. Furthermore, the curse of eternal Civil War imposed upon king David. Unlike Shaul whose dedication of the mitzva of Moshiach utterly profaned Natan commanded the mussar that Civil War would persue all generations of king David consequent to the “blood on his hands.”

        The NT false messiah Roman Protocals of the Elders of Zion forgery – totally ignores the key Torah concept of Moshiach as defined to lead the nation in times of “war” (an undefined participle) to rule the land with Judicial courtroom justice which makes fair restitution of damages inflicted by one bnai brit upon another. Hence just as the Sanhedrin Federal Court system defines the נמשל k’vanna of building the Beit Ha-Mikdash משל; absolutely no different from the Mishkan משל to the לא בשמים היא revelation that the tohor 13 Oral Torah middot forever judge the heart of the chosen Cohen people!

        The Torah mitzva of Moshiach the Roman fraudulent NT propaganda cannot substitute itself for any Torah commandment because by the terms of the Apostle Paul – Goyim not under the Law. Just as Goyim cannot negate the mitzva of brit melah so too and how much more so Goyim religions of Av tuma avoda zarah cannot determine the Torah mitzva of Moshiach. The mitzva of Moshiach directly bound, like Yitzak at the Akadah, to the leadership of guiding the people in times of War to not loss faith and fail to pursue righteous judicial justice both among our people and against our enemies in times of crisis or war.

      62. No – a Nazi is someone who supports an extreme right-wing authoritarian doctrine based on racist ideology and advocating genocide – you know, like Netanyahu and the fanatical Jews.

      67. Israel continues its international attacks – with impunity:

        In Lebanon, Israel has killed at least 350 people since the 2024 Israel-Lebanon ‘ceasefire’, and keeps attacking people, including UN peacekeepers. Israel is continuing its illegal occupation of parts of Syria and Lebanon.

      68. We’ve already refuted your dead baby joke by pointing out that your people killed 10Xs more civilians than did Israel in Gaza, despite there being no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and the massacre of Oct 7th 2023. STFU.

      69. Having a discussion with a Xtian religious fanatic who assumes that Xtianity determines and shapes the rules by which Judaism exists.

        etb. your final comment – not a refutation of what I introduced. Its a my way or the highway declaration. You & I never in the same domain; Xtianity has no part with Torah. As a Xtian your theology avoda zara spins around NT-theism/Protestant academic epistemology. You slavishly anchor your theology in peshat. But peshat does not exist divorced from drosh; Adam & Eve a paired couple Ooops. The chief flaw of Xtianity – it limits the reality of the Gods to 3-D history. LOL Torah commands mussar not history. Oooops. Bottom line: Xtianity evaluated as textual continuity, not halakhic legitimacy

        Your invocation of procedural failure (“flooding,” “no shared method,” “manifesto”) as your exit retreat reminds me of a dog running away with its tail between its legs peeing all over itself. By your “rules” (Xtianity does not impose rules upon Israeli Jews) of “flooding: I failed to: isolate a single narrow thesis, redefined terms unilaterally, expanded scope faster than you could respond, & used mockery where you demanded analytic restraint. Hence “A continually expanding manifesto…” — is procedurally accurate inside your paradigm.

        Your core assumptions – false. 1. Shared method is required for truth. 2. Peshat has veto power. 3. History is the foundation of obligation. 4. Theology can be adjudicated without the oaths sworn by the Avot which created the chosen Cohen people from Torah time-oriented commandments. The Oral Torah precisely rejects all 4 false Goyim theological premises. Why? Because Xtianity treats the Torah as a text they can argue about. Wrong. Goyim never once ever accepted the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. Just that simple, no fancy dancing. The sworn oaths of the avot and the revelation of HaShem in this Earth rather than in the Heavens – not a subject open to debate.

        Xtianity in general and you in particular openly reject the Sanhedrin logic which begins with: “Who is authorized to speak within this court?” Torah Courts permit only judicial opinions, which disqualifies you from the start. For example your gross ignorance of peshat — when you declare: “You dismiss peshat when it disagrees with you…”, simply bat-shit crazy false. Peshat fits hand in glove with drosh. Rabbi Akiva taught this kabbalah which you know nothing about.

        Peshat ≠ final authority; simply not the final authority in Torah hermeneutics. “Lo bashamayim hi” explicitly de-centers textual literalism. So your pie in the sky declaration “If peshat is dismissed, all else collapses”, simply a joke. LOL Xtian textual ontology of Protestant Higher Criticism. Such early 20th Century nonsense of philosophy that studies the nature of being, existence, and reality, has no portion or part in the revelation of the Oral Torah at Horev — especially rejected and abhorred post Shoah – By their Fruits you shall know them. You remain stuck in your dead religion, on par with having sex with a dead body. As a religious exile your stuck waiting for the 2nd coming of your God.

        Universal monotheism ≠ Torah faith. Xtianity stands outside the Sinai legal universe. Textual continuity does not equal to the Torah commandment for the chosen Cohen people to eternally remember the oaths sworn by the Avot by which they cut the oath brit time-oriented commandment wherein the generations of their seed forever create the chosen cohen people from nothing. At Sinai/Horev Israel accepted by means of the נעשה\נשמע oaths – We accepted the Written and Oral Torah as one revelation לשמה.

        Xtianity Non-Sinaitic readers can adjudicate Torah meaning — Bunk. Xtianity never had any jurisdictional arguments – ever. Not by Paul, nor by JeZeus, and most certainly not by you. Sanhedrin common law courtrooms in no way shape or form compare to a university seminar any more that a person can choose his gender at birth. XX does not change to XY because an “it” desires such.

      79. The puke vomit of Xtian theology which attempts to white-wash its war-crimes criminal guilt.

        The Xtian tradition that proclaims itself timelessly pure while repeatedly reframing, minimizing, or spiritualizing away its own institutional violence, by Torah standards, lying about its shem tov; in Torah terms, this crime/guilt not a question of belief but of יראת שמים. Same old Xtian whitewash which pristinely declares a theological narrative that presents itself as pure, timeless, and universal. While ignoring, minimizing, or spiritually reframing the very real historical violence carried out in the name of that same corrupt and fraudulent tradition; the very manifestation of “by their fruits you shall know them”. Grace without reckoning” is not mercy; but rather chaos-anarchy hefkerut.

        The Torah employs a far sharper prophetic mussar rebuke: ”Fear of Heaven”. Which means: “Baal Shem Tov/Master of the Good Name; a person with יראת שמים guards and protects his/her “good name reputation”. A “Son of God” who abolishes mitzvot, by definition, avodah zarah – not fulfillment of prophetic mussar. The latter – like both the shabbat, & the dedication of korbanot time-oriented commandments which dedicate Torah wisdom and not Goyim wisdom – likewise expressed through the Moshiach Av precedent – the anointed House of Aaron. This av precedent for the mitzva of Moshiach from the Torah, like every other wisdom of Torah time-oriented wisdom-commandments, applicable to all generations of Israel straight across the board. The NT false messiah av tuma avoda zara which equates their messiah as God, no different than the worship of Baal. The latter place their God upon a pedestal as does the church worships JeZeus as a cult of personality messiah God.

        Mashiach in Torah – a mitzvah-category, not a metaphysical NT cult of personality savior. The Torah mitzva of Moshiach stands upon the Torah mitzva of Shabbat as its יסוד precedent of Torah common law. Just as the mitzva of Shabbat applies to all Jews in every generations so too and how much more so Jews obligated to pursue righteous justice/fair compensation of damages inflicted upon other Jews. Herein defines the mitzva of Moshiach from the Torah, as opposed to the false messiah NT. Church propaganda to this very day denies the revelation of the Oral Torah.
         
        Xtianity down through the Ages, both pre-Shoah & post-Shoah, prostitution-devotional language to create a sense of moral innocence that erases the war-crime guilt of victims who endured violence; like witches burned at the “steak” Monty Python ‘she turned me into a newt” classic spoof comedy; it denies the revelation of the נמשל Mishkan-Shekinah as taught by Torah kabbalah. The virgin birth myth places the NT narrative squarely inside Hellenistic avodah zara category.

        A real, well‑documented pattern in Xtian history – a tradition whose guilt committed enormous war-crimes not limited only to Jews! Post Shoah all branches of the church abomination, they deny the revelation of the Shekinah Oral Torah 13 tohor middot which live Yatzir Ha-tov in this Earth, and not in the Heavens above. Yet this av tuma “unrepentant” church continues to preach an orchestrated white-wash “spiritual propaganda religious rhetoric” which promotes the same identical stainless spotless church cleansed from sin – NT theological lies: whose Father dwells in the Heavens above, JeZeus 2nd coming narishkeit.
         
        The redemption of Egyptian slavery makes no mention of “sin” nor salvation from Adam’s sin – as church dogma perverts the Torah revelation of Sinai; with its JeZeus substitute God that depicts the Church as morally spotless, timeless, and divinely sanctioned — without reckoning with the violence abominations guilt committed in the Name of JeZeus av tuma avoda zara.
         
        Xtianity in all its shapes and forms: A tradition which claims, regardless be it Catholic, Protestant, or Mormon, purity while its historical record – anything but pure. Devotional rhetoric becomes a shield, allowing these religious institutions to talk about “holiness,” “remnants,” “refinement,” and “obedience” — while sidestepping the war-criminal guilt that defines all generations of the church abomination on this Earth.

        No amount of JeZeus saves Man, the essence of Paul’s preaching model “Original Sin of Adam”; can remove the stain of church guilt throughout the Ages – after Constantine I converted Rome to the Xtian faith abomination of av tuma avoda zarah. The NT revisionist history compares to the substitute theology of king Shlomo replacing a Goyim cultural custom which worships Gods through grand Temple construction of “idol” wood and stone “Temples”; his failure to establish the Great Sanhedrin with its Small Sanhedrin Federal court “spokes” of lateral common law courts, as the definition and intent meaning of the term “Beit HaMikdash.
         
        The church war criminals employ the same old religious rhetoric propaganda from new ‘Born Again’ fool-sheeple; this Xtian theology seeks to erase the horrors of its racism; and the guilt its “believers” ruthlessly subjected upon church victims; who simply disappear from the narrative, replaced by a self‑congratulatory spiritual identity – like a rabbit pulled from a hat. These ever repeating perpetrators employ the same old white-wash religious rhetoric which reinvents themselves in the eyes of other — new ignorant sheeple generations of ‘Born Again’ naive simpletons — who believe the same old guilty religious rhetoric which produced vicious church war-crimes in all past present and future generations.
         
        The new foolish sheeple ‘Born Again’ fools simply mouth the excuse, that prior guilty generations of Church Nicene Creed abomination war-crimes, that those criminals – not really Xtians; like post Oct 7th 2023 antisemites declared the righteous innocence of Gazans who in a general 2006 election voted Hamas as the government of Gaza; victims of a ruthless Israeli post Oct 7th 2023 genocide!
         
        Bottom line: Post Shoah, the church has permanently destroyed its good name reputation across both Europe and America. The American & French revolution destroyed the church who chiefly profited which it used as slave labor to build its Solomon like Cathedrals. The American & French revolutions cast the church/State monopoly upon the dung heaps of history. The establishment of citizen rights and separation of Church from State, began the collapse of church influence in Western Europe and America.

        Both Enlightenment political revolutions embraced this absolute rejection of Government incest with the “Sister” church whore. Likewise the Bolshevik revolution, which based itself upon the 1848 Marx ‘Das Capital’ manifesto, both Lenin and Troskii accredited the Central Influence behind the 1917 Oct Revolution to the 1789 French Revolution!
         
        The history of Xtian Amalek-antisemitism – well-documented. These cold facts have forced a minority of Xtian believers to acknowledge gross church guilt for war crimes. The Xtian deicide propaganda, for example, has propped up church war-crimes for millennia – straight from the taboo inception of its adultery ‘virgin birth’ Greek Hercules mythology NT gospel foundations.

        In the Era of the Mishna a man engaged to a woman one year prior to them standing upon the “Chuppa” which permitted the kallah to organize her “house”. Hence a wife referred to as “house”, and the chuppa considered the “first house” of the newly married couple.
        A year separated the arusin engagement or betrothal period, from standing under the chuppa.

        Greek av tuma avoda zarah permits and applauds Zeus raping a married woman. Torah abhors adultery as an av tuma Capital Crime closely related with avoda zara. Torah common law differentiates Capital Crime cases by establishment from the Torah commandments 4 separate types of ‘death penalties’. Hence the mythology of ‘virgin birth – son of God’ Greek culture NT appropriations, an utter abomination to Torah law.

        The Sh’mot Mishkan משל does not remotely resemble or compare to the NT virgin birth perversion theology. The נמשל of the Mishkan revelation of the first commandment Spirit Name – expressed through the revelation of the 13 tohor Oral Torah middot spirits – that HaShem lives in the Yatzir Ha-Tov of the chosen Cohen peoples’ hearts rather than in the av tuma avoda zara which frames Universal Monotheism Gods comparable physical and historical Olympian Gods, which live in the heavens – like JeZeus prayer which addresses the Father who lives in Heaven, and the opening verse of gospel John. Tohor spirits simply not “and the Word was God” Av tuma Xtian avoda zara.
         
        Bottom line: the NT Apostle Paul’s dogmatism that Goyim not under Torah law; that circumcision no longer a Torah commandment etc., this means that Goyim cannot thereafter dictate what defines the Torah commandment of Moshiach; especially since the church has failed in all generations unto today to distinguish T’NaCH/Talmudic common law from Roman-Caesar Statute-law. The JeZeus false messiah paradigm shares no part nor connection with the Torah commandment of Moshiach. Telling and retelling Nazi Jewish inferior race propaganda lies never equals truth. The same rule equally applies to NT lies about its false messiah JeZeus – “Son of God” av tuma avoda zara.
         
        NT texts like Matthew 27:25, fueled antisemitic Amalek tropes from late antiquity onward. Post the conversion of Constantine which baptized Roman NT Monotheism and rejected previous Roman Caesar polytheism – Greek Gods of Mount Olympus; perhaps starting with early church fathers like John Chrysostom, who in the 4th century called for violence against Jews.

        His Christ-Killer slander escalated throughout the Middle Ages with pogroms, blood libels, and massacres during the Crusades (1096–1272), where thousands of Jews ruthlessly murdered across the Germanic kingdoms – en route to the Holy Land. The Black Death (1347–1351) Xtian priests blamed Jews for poisoning the wells. This outright blood libel slander resulted in widespread pogrom burnings and expulsions.

        After the fact papal pie in the sky-bulls which condemned such violence, did not actually pursue fair compensation of damages for 10s of thousands of murdered Jews! In point of fact, no European court ever once made the church stand before the BAR for war-crimes guilt.
         
        The Spanish Inquisition (1478–1834) followed the English taxation without representation which preceded the mass expulsion of Jews from England in 1290. The French publicly burned all Talmudic manuscripts of the Talmud in Paris 1242, then likewise made its own mass population transfer of Jewish refugee population which had no rights in 1306.

        The Germanic kingdoms embraced the British Crowns’ impoverishment of Jewish refugees, through taxation without representation. And the Pope followed these crimes up by imposing ghetto gulags for some 3 Centuries upon utterly impoverished Jewish refugees. This criminal guilt war-crimes against Humanity resulted in a huge population transfer of Jewish refugees fleeing from the tyranny of Western European governments to Ukraine and Poland Eastern Europe.
         
        Then in 1648 the targeted Jews slaughtered in mass, a violent Cossack atrocity unequalled till the Shoah! Ape like savage barbarity defines the church MO throughout the generations; repentance for sin in no way, fashion, shape, or form compares to t’shuva which requires remembering the oaths sworn by the Avot which creates through tohor time oriented av Torah commandments the chosen Cohen people throughout the generations that the chosen seed of the Avot walk the face of this Earth. This t’shuva remembers the sin of the Golden Calf av tuma avoda zara which defines Rosh HaShanna – Yom Ha-Din upon the brit.

        Post Shoah church repentance for the Catholic Rat-lines which significantly aided Nazi war criminals from facing justice, the Vatican II’s Nostra Aetate (1965) repudiated collective Jewish guilt for Jesus’ death and condemnation of the Nazi (as opposed to the Dreyfus Affair idea of antisemitism which sought to exclude Jews from citizen rights established by the French Revolution & Napoleon), merely white-washed Vatican guilt which turned over the Jews of Rome to the Nazi SS.
         
        The Evangelical Church in Germany (1980) confessed to “Xtian co-responsibility and guilt for the Holocaust;” yet failed to openly denounce and condemn both Martin Luther and his Lutheran church which openly sided in mass to achieve – in lock-step – the Nazi objective to exterminate Jews as an inferior race. Texts like 2 Corinthians 7:10 distinguish “godly sorrow” (leading to salvation) from “worldly sorrow” (leading to the Xtian church death spiral). Modern theologians like Jürgen Moltmann argue the Shoah demands a “theology of the cross” that confronts suffering and guilt, rather than evading it; such empty religious rhetoric fools no one based upon past Xtian repentance for sins narishkeit.
         
        Clergy like Bishop Alois Hudal and Krunoslav Draganović aided ~9,000 Nazis (e.g., Eichmann, Mengele) via escape routes to Argentina, Brazil, Chile—often hiding in monasteries. Vatican archives suggest Pius XII not directly involved, but the Church’s anti-communist stance (Nazis as bulwark) facilitated the Popes alliance with Hitler’s Nazism. This aided Shoah perpetrators evading justice, undermining post Shoah repentance claims.
         
        Enlightenment thinkers like Voltaire criticized Church corruption, influencing secularism. The Bolsheviks, drawing from Marx’s Marx’s famous expression of the Xtian religion as “opium of the people,” despised Xtianity. These brief examples served as the fore runners to the EU refusing to mention Xtianity in its attempt to establish an EU Constitution. Xtian “grace-over-accountability” only white-washes and conceals Xtian church failure of accountability – which directly aided and abetted the Nazi inspired Shoah!
         
        Post Shoah “identificational-repentance” has only amplified the death spiral of church-state dominance which the American & French revolutions completely despised, rejected, and even abhorred. The dead church like the Greek Gods of Mount Olympus – both undermined and destroyed by criminal acts of extreme racial violence, starting perhaps with the Roman sacking and burning of the great library in Alexandria Egypt.
         
        Possible Xtian guilt-role which culminated in the destruction of the Library of Alexandria in 391 CE: Patriarch Theophilus demolished the Serapeum (a daughter library) amid pagan-Xtian riots; where Xtian fanatics destroyed pagan artifacts. Earlier damages: Caesar’s 48 BCE siege, & Aurelian’s 272 CE reconquest likewise contributed to the collapse and decline of this great ancient Library. While there were several incidents of damage to the library throughout history, including during the Roman occupation, its complete destruction did not occur until later events, particularly during the crisis in the 3rd century CE and other subsequent conflicts.

      80. Well, as I have made clear – I’m not a Christian. I think all organised religion stinks – including the Torah.

      83. Talmud scholarship directly compares to enslaved Israelites who build Par’o Egyptian cities by making bricks with straw. This metaphor משל requires that the reading audience themselves make the required דיוק-logical inference which the Talmud calls: נמשל. This Talmudic requirement defines a key aspect of the kabbalah of rabbi Akiva’s פרדס inductive logic that defines how the sages in the Talmud understand the revelation of the Oral Torah at Horev. Clearly the Gemara, sealed in approximately 450 CE in Iraq not the same as the period of time when Moshe Rabbeinu heard the revelation of the 13 tohor middot at Horev which define how to comprehend the revelation of the שם השם לשמה expressed in the first Sinai Torah commandment.

        Goyim religious leaders therefore disregard the Talmud “codification” known as the “Oral Torah” by Jewish audiences who study T’NaCH and Talmudic common law. Talmud compares to the metaphor of a Loom which has warp & weft opposing threads; the kabbalah of פרדס inductive reasoning logic splits דרוש-פשט affixed to the Aggadic threads of the chosen Cohen peoples culture and customs which the T’NaCH\Talmud weaves; akin to the Torah garments which the Book of שמות commands for Aaron and his sons.

        The construction of Cohen culture and customs (still another metaphor משל) compares to Israelite slave who built treasure cities for Par’o. The Talmud employs as its “straw made into bricks”, the 7 middot of Hillel, 10 middot of Akiva, 13 middot of Yishmael, and 32 middot of HaGalill. The specifics of the opening Av Mishna of קידושין, both Mishna together with its Gemara commentary “construct” Talmudic פרדס inductive logic through the “bricks” of rabbi Akiva’s רבוי מיעט line of reasoning. The opening first two words of this Mishna האשה נקנית makes a מיעט which excluded a קטנה-little girl from the mitzva of קידושין. The legalism of Talmudic scholarship requires that the reading public differentiate the kabbalah of rabbinic middot bricks. Failure to discern the type of “middot bricks” used in the “construction” of a specific Mishna/Gemara results in catastrophic error. The Rambam in his statute law halachic code, organized based upon the Order of Roman statute law which “shapes” law into legal categories failed to grasp that small young girls excluded from the Mitzva of קידושין like a lame animal excluded from being a korban dedicated upon the altar. This gross fundamental error post ירידות הדורות-domino effect – down stream generations – failed to grasp and correct. This fundamental error compares to aiming a rifle at a down range target.

        Both Adin Steinsalts and the ArtScroll Schottenstein Editions attempt to impose their versions of a Talmudic translation. Steinsalts resembles the Rambam in that both men translated Talmudic Aramaic into Hebrew. The ArtScroll attempts to translate the Talmud into English. The most basic fundamental which translation theories fail to grasp: T’NaCH mussar aggadic common law and Halachic Gemara common law (warp vs weft) both stand upon precedents from other similar Case/Din outside sources of T’NaCH or Talmudic Primary Sources. Neither the Hebrew T’NaCH nor the Talmud read like the Xtians and Muslims read their bible and koran non common law “translations”.

        Only Israel accepts, to this day the revelation of the Torah לשמה – but only within the borders of the oath sworn lands. The counterfeit translations of both bible and koran worship word translation – Golden Calves. אלהים did not take Israel out of Egypt. The דיוק which the Sinai revelation makes upon Divine Names previously introduced in the opening Book of בראשית – the Sinai revelation לשמה … the difference between God in the heavens to god in the Yatzir Ha-Tov of the Cohen hearts in this Earth below. The משל of the Mishkan further emphasizes this absolutely critical distinction which both the Xtian bible and Muslim koran “translations” lose through their “translations”. Both fail to make the absolutely required דיוק נמשל – the Sinai revelation separates the dwelling of רוח הקודש tohor Oral Torah middot spirits, living inside the Yatzir Ha-Tov hearts — from Universal Monotheistic theologies which worship God in the Heavens. The substance of the k’vanna of the 2nd Sinai commandment. Translating do not worship אלהים אחרים to idols compares to assuming that קידושין – a mitzva that includes little girls.

        Granted, king Shlomo’s grand Temple idol of wood and stone qualifies as within the bounds of the 2nd Sinai commandment. Torah wisdom discerns and does not confuse forms for substance. The substance of Torah “faith”: the righteous pursuit of justice among the bnai brit people NOT belief in theologically “created” New Gods – name Jesus or Allah respectively.

        ס”ד אמינא הואיל ו … קמ”ל this Gemara phrase exposes the logical “brick” known as a middah – רבוי מיעט. Both the Xtian and Muslim faiths declare: I might have thought that both Jesus and Allah exist as one Monotheistic Universal God for all Mankind … קמ”ל. No. These av tuma avoda zara “New Gods”, a Torah abomination; both Av tuma theologies pervert the revelation of Torah common law – faith, into twisted and perverted religions belief systems. Both reject the revelation of Torah common law as the faith obligation – “Yoke of the Kingdom of Heaven” – placed upon the shoulders of all generations of the chosen Cohen people alone. The revelation of the שם השם לשמה at Sinai — the local tribal god of the Jewish people alone. Goyim by definition worship אלהים אחרים.

        Xtianity worships a false messiah. While Islam pretends that prophets sent to all peoples speaking in the native tongues of those peoples who fundamentally reject the revelation of the Torah common law legalism at Sinai. Both corrupted religions translate “prophets” into little girls fit for the mitzva of קידושין through rape. Yonah sent to the refugees the king of Assyria forcefully expelled from the conquered kingdom of Israel. Just as pre-g’lut prophets equally travelled to the kingdom of Samaria to command mussar. Torah prophets never sent to all peoples across the Earth as the koran falsely declares. Prophets do not predict the future as the NT falsely declares. Prophets – like the mitzva of Shabbat defines the mitzva of Moshiach in that both Torah commandments apply equally to all peoples and generations of bnai brit to pursue and rule the chosen Cohen people with righteous justice based upon the מיעט פרט of Uriah the Hittite mussar rebuke by which the prophet Natan cursed David with eternal Civil War blood shed; David failed in this specific particular case to sanctify the mitzva of Moshiach, no different than king Shaul who failed to obey the prophetic mussar commanded by Shemuel which order Shaul to slaughter Amalek. This כלל – פרט middah “brick” of rabbi Yishmael serves to defines the k’vanna dedication of the mitzva of Moshiach, like as does the רבוי מיעט excludes little girls from the mitzva of kiddushin.

        The wisdom of the Torah affixed through Av tohor time-oriented commandments. As positive & negative Torah commandments serves as common law precedents having the purpose to discern k’vanna required for av time oriented commandment … thereby elevated to av tohor commandments rather than remaining as secondary precedent commandments which do not require k’vanna. This “Torah wisdom” equally applies to Oral Torah halachic mitzvot within and across the Talmud which too do not require k’vanna. The Aggadic portions of the Talmud make a דרוש\פשט to T’NaCH Primary sources which permits all generations of Talmudic scholarship to learn the k’vanna of prophetic mussar and “weave” this prophetic mussar as the k’vanna of observing halachic mitzvot ritual observances as codified in the later rabbinic codes. The halachot codified in the Shulkan Aruch statute law assimilated perversion of the Rambam base error – do not require k’vanna. The commentaries made upon the Rambam’s Yad fail to affix his halachic “translations” to a specific halachah within the B’HaG or Rif or Rosh common law codes which open with a specific Mishna. Hence all these ירידות הדורות-domino effect, down stream generations of error – treif.

      89. You lie. International law first and foremost applies strictly to the High Seas. You bs attempts to impose “British impressment of American sailors seized from American ship” to serve in the British navy for a 25 year prison term! You’re no different that the British corrupt star courts of king George V.

      91. Again “it applies to ALL countries” except Britain slaughtered 650,000 Iraqis and did not stand trial for war crimes. Fuck YOU mr Ego I hypocrite.

      92. Two wrongs never make a right no matter how much you try. The Iraq war was the USAs. A crime as bad as Gaza.

      93. Don’t see the UN condemning Britain even once for its war crimes. Shove your 2 wrongs don’t make a right bs buck up your butt face.

      94. The UN is the bastion of international law and did call out the UK and USA over Iraq. But Iraq, for all its wrongs, was not genocide!

      101. Middot define both T’NaCH and Talmud scholarship. Middot compare to notes on a music sheet, based upon the Shabbat public reading of the Sefer Torah.

        The Torah and NaCH prophets learn from the 13 tohor middot revealed to Moshe at Horev following the sin of the Golden Calf avoda zara where assimilated and intermarried ערב רב Israelites translated the “word” אלהים as a replacement for the revelation of the שם השם לשמה. Meaning all other Divine Names first introduced in the Book of בראשית refer to the vision of a God in the Heavens above. The Sinai revelation changed this spirituality unto the revelation of the שם השם לשמה who lives within the Yatzir Ha-Tov of the chosen Cohen people in this Earth below just as the משל “form” of the Mishkan Sinai revelation teaches the mussar of the נמשל “substance” that the שם השם לשמה permanently resides upon the Earth below and not the Heavens above. דכתיב: דברים ל:יב – לא בשמים היא.

        The Aggadic portions throughout the Talmud turn to the note chords/middot of Yossi Ha’Gallilee and his 32 middot. The Halachic portions of the Talmud turn to the note cords/middot of Hillel, Yishmael and Akiva. For example: the midda גזרה שוו an “identical clause/phrase” located in two or more locations across the Sha’s Bavli. To learn this particular midda, something like the Front/Top\Side views of a building blue-print: based upon the descriptive “chord” comparative משל to reading the Sefer Torah on Shabbat: a chord does not stand alone all by itself upon a music-sheet; all songs which any music sheets communicate most essentially combine a particular גזרה שוו note/chord combined with other note/chords to create a “tune”.

        Consequently just as a construction “blue-print” with its front-top-side viewpoints gives a 3-D understanding from a two-D blueprint so too the גזרה שוו chord/midda in one specific Gemara sugya has different “tune” surrounding middot/chords than that same גזרה שוו mdda chord contained and surrounded by other “tune” middot chords; thus comparing a midda/chord גזרה שוו to the exact same midda/chord located within some other precedent sugya of Gemara duplicates what the blue print front/top\side views enable the contractor to grasp the 3-D intent from a 2-D blueprint.

      108. ‘hundreds of thousands’ of innocent people in Gaza have been ‘completely murdered’ so developers can cash in on a so‑called ‘New Gaza.’ Marjorie Taylor Green

      126. The Torah vision of Zionism

        Isaiah 11:1-9 indeed emphasizes themes of justice, peace, and harmony among the chosen Cohen people within the borders of the brit land inheritance sworn to Avraham Yitzak and Yaacov. It has no larger reference to Goyim in other lands and foreign countries any more than the Sanhedrin courts have “legal jurisdiction” outside of the borders of the oath sworn brit lands…NOT.

        The passage emphasizes a hoped-for restoration of a united 12 tribe Republic following king Shlomo’s avoda zara which resulted in the permanent split between the kingdom of Yechuda and the kingdom of Samaria till both kingdoms destroyed and uprooted unto g’lut cursed destruction due to the worship of av tuma avoda zara. This hope-for re-unification of the 12 tribes of the brit Republic has absolutely nothing to do with any particular leader in the future; the משל of predator/pray animals eating and frolicking docilly together in open fields carries no such narishkeit longing for an av tuma avoda zara pie in the sky Moshiach superman who saves America from crime and evil.

        The prophet Isaiah repeatedly addresses the fractured kingdoms’ re-unification. Isaiah 11:10 “in that day, the root of Jesse will stand as a banner for the peoples; the Goyim will seek him, and his resting place will be glorious.” Absolutely does not go out of the כלל of making political strategic alliances with Goyim; like Israel has a key alliance with the United States today. This p’suk based upon other T’NaCH sources where kings of both kingdoms cut alliances with Goyim. Frequently those alliances like king Shlomo’s foreign marriages such as to the daughter of Par’o – crossed the line which the Sanhedrin courts condemned. Prophets enforce Sanhedrin courtroom rulings.

        The king Shlomo example: as clear as the Sun on a cloudless day that arrogant king ignored the authority of Sanhedrin courts! A legal proof which supports this after the fact contention: Shlomo’s personal court judged the Capital Crimes Case of the two prostitutes and dead infant serves as witness. A second common law legal precedent: Shlomo did not established – as David and the prophet Natan commanded – not the cities of refuge Small Sanhedring Capital Crimes Courts and neither the Great Sanhedrin Federal Capital Crimes Court. Shlomo rejected the Torah Constitutional mandate which authorizes משנה תורה-Legislative Review over any and all legal law decreed by either Tribal governments or king Shlomo’s government.

        The rule of פשט לא יוצא מכלל – directly applies to p’sukim 11:10 and 11:12. Reshonim opinions followed the sealing of the Talmud masoret. Those secondary/tertiary opinions do not at all compare to the Talmudic כלל – the dream follows after its interpretation. All post sealing of the Sha’s Bavli rabbinic sources restricted to later precedent interpretations of a by-gone Middle Ages of Jewish oppression in g’lut. The Torah speaks in the language of Man. Prophets not witches – the latter tuma predict the future. T’NaCH prophets command prophetic mussar which applies equally to all generations of the chosen Cohen people alone. Only Israel accepts to this very day the revelation of the Torah. Zechariah 14: This משל describes a time when all nations will come to worship God in Jerusalem at the Feast of Sukkot. This chag a direct written Torah commandment.

        The wisdom commandment\time-oriented mitzva of Moshiah learns directly from Moshe anointing the House of Aaron as Moshiach. Aaron dedicated korbanot as wisdom time-oriented commandments. What k’vanna defines the dedication of korbanot? The wisdom time-oriented commandment of Moshiach requires the נמשל k’vanna which dedicates צדק צדק תרדוף as the definition of Torah faith. In this light, the discussions around nations (Goyim) can be understood as not just referring to geopolitical entities, but rather as a call for moral alliances based on shared values and divine aspirations. Consequently, any pie in the sky superhero Moshiach, or a codified Rambam “statute book” that pretends to replace live Sanhedrin process, like both NT and Koran av tuma avoda zara – betrayal of the Torah’s own legal architecture.

        In the specific Oral Torah mitzva of Moshiach, inclusive of the restoration of constitutional Torah governance; of constitutional Torah governance – the re‑establishment of Sanhedrin authority – through the national dedication to צדק צדק תרדוף. Simply re-stated this wisdom commandment/time-oriented mitzva understands that it’s a Torah commandment no different that Shabbat = the collective wisdom‑commandment, not some son of God miracle‑worker. This mitzva sanctifies the dedication of the restoration of Torah Constitutional justice: a Federal Sanhedrin lateral courtroom common law justice system together with its prophetic “police” who command prophetic mussar as enforcement of Sanhedrin courtroom legal rulings even when they make a משנה תורה legislative review of any and all tribal and federal government statute laws. Bottom line: the objective of Zionism today: To accept the revelation of the Torah @ Sinai/Horev based upon the Torah precedent that our forefathers accepted the local tribal god who brought our people out of Egypt into Canaan.

      129. Don’t be foolish. I’m not supporting Netanyahu and his war criminal gang of genocide merchants, nor Trump and his imbecilic supporter of the fascist dictator Putin. That’s you.

      144. Trump speaking live at the Trump Board of Peace in DC. Yesterday, the Israeli Foreign Minister directly rebuked England in the UN. LOL About time. Your 3rd world country not included on the Trump Board of Peace. HaHaHaHaHa

      145. Being rebuked by a war criminal, genocide merchant is similar to being rebuked by Hitler and Putin. You support genocide. Disgusting,

      148. Fuck you Oaf supporter of the White Paper betrayal of the Balfour Declaration and 1922 League of Nations Palestine Mandate to establish a Jewish National Home in Palestine.

      149. Aaaah! So finally you recognise Palestine!! That’s a first. You’ll be pleased to know that I too am all in favour of there being a Jewish state. I think there should be a Palestinian one too!
        I don’t recall ANYONE suggesting that the setting up of A Jewish state should involve the genocide of Palestinians though.

      151. Rubbish. You always denied there was a Palestine. The Palestinians never went away. The Jews just displaced them from a lot of Palestine and now is practicing genocide against them.
        Ironic – that the people who were subject to genocide should then carry it out on others! It’s like people who are bullied have a greater tendency to become bullies.

      156. The fundamental restrictions of the Sinai brit.

        The Torah Cohanim laws in ויקרא, encompass various aspects of Jewish life, particularly regarding sexual morality\ערבה, the tohor-tuma holiness Code, where this Book closes with the Blessing/Curse revelation of the k’vanna of the accepted Sinai brit. The concepts of tahor (purity) and tamei (impurity) – spirits within the YaTzir Tov\Ya Tzir Raw within the heart, herein defines the נמשל of the revelation of the Mishkan at Sinai. All Torah commandments subsumed under the revelation of the Torah at Sinai; the greatest Torah commandment of all Torah commandments – the first Sinai commandment. No Torah commandment has greater authority than the 1st Torah commandment at Sinai.

        This crucial important understanding כלל, the overall spiritual and communal framework of Moshe anointing the House of Aaron as Moshiach, פרט which defines this כלל. The mitzva of Moshiach no more applicable to Goyim any more than the observance of shabbat. The latter mitzva requires the ability to discern between מלאכה from עבודה. The NT Greek language, for example, does not discern any fundamental or even secondary distinction between these two completely different Hebrew verbs which the Greek NT translates as work. Hence the Xtian Man-God JeZeus did not grasp how to sanctify the time-oriented wisdom commandment NOT shabbat NOR moshiach. Consequently both the NT and Koran exist as false prophet theology which seeks to entice Israel to worship other Gods.

        ויקרא יח — כ laws of Cohonim as applicable to Goyim who reject the revelation the Torah at Sinai as Mars lack of water compares to Earth covered by vast majority in water. Goyim outsiders cannot usurp the Hebrew T’NaCH simply by renaming it “Old Testament”. Dishonesty defines the Xtian bible from start to finish; the revelation of Torah judicial common law Sanhedrin mandate radically different from Goyim worship of their Gods who live in the Heavens above.

        For example: The Goyim bible knows nothing of the oath sworn brit at Sh’Cem prior to the 7 year war to conquer Canaan. Goyim know nothing of how Torah defines the culture, customs, and practices which shape the identity of the Jewish people. Their ‘I am saved through JeZeus’ reflected in the post WWII ‘born again’ fad – completely oblivious to the church crimes (both Catholic & Protestant) that culminated in the Shoah European guilt. Actions have their consequences. 2000+ years of Xtian war crimes against Humanity by no means limited to the Jews alone.

        Xtian faith exists only as mythology, especially after 2000+ years of failed 2nd coming “Good News”. Where was JeZeus during the Shoah? Church has no shame b/c its believers take no responsibility for their criminal behavior from generation to generation to generation — only evil and wickedness. Answer for the crimes of the Inquisition or the forced mass population transfers or the extermination of entire populations in the New World and across the Pacific Islands and Africa. Never has any Xtian country made religious war criminals stand trial. Post WWII the Church opened rat-lines to assist Nazis to flee from standing trial. And Poland initiated pogroms against Jews returning to reclaim title to their properties!

        The 7 mitzvot bnai noach, an Aggadah within mesechta Sanhedrin addresses the type of Goy temporary resident known as Ger Toshav. By contrast mesechta Baba Kama addresses the 2nd type of Goy living within the borders of the oath sworn lands “brit” sworn as the eternal inheritance of the chosen Cohen seed of the Avot and only to this chosen seed. Hence the Torah records that Moshe received command not to invade the lands of Esau!

        Mesechta Baba Kama refers to the Goyim whom the king of Assyria settled in the captured 10 Tribe kingdom of Samaria/Israel. The Book of Ezra/Nehemiah refers to these people who converted out of ‘fear of lions’ as Shomronim – which the NT calls ‘Samaritans’. The Book of D’varim refers to both types of Goyim in the case of treif meat: its permitted to give this type of flesh as a present to the ger toshav or sell it to the “nacree”. The Talmud, multiple generations of sages, debated the status of the Nacreeim and reached the conclusion which excluded them as having any legal connection to Torah judicial justice laws. Why? The Samaritan forerunners of the Karaim and Xtians – one and all declared themselves the ‘NEW Israel’.

        The Rambam held that the 7 mitzvot bnain Noach apply to all Goyim. Aggada makes a drosh/p’shat back to interpret T’NaCH prophetic mussar based upon similar T’NaCH case/din mussar rulings. This prophetic mussar has the power when “woven” into halachic ritual observances to elevate a positive rabbinic mitzva into a Av tohor Torah time-oriented wisdom commandment. Confusing the private opinion by the Rambam, whom both the court of Rabbeinu Yona in Spain and the majority of the Baali Tosafot in France both condemned the Rambam’s statute halachic code and Guide Greek philosophy as a Torah abomination — based upon the dedication of the lights of Hanukkah wherein the P’rushim dedicated the korban of lights to only interpret the Written Torah with the logic of the Oral Torah. Greek deductive logic the blessing on Hanukkah recalls that the Greeks sought to cause Israel to forget the (Oral) Torah.

        Assimilated Rambam from Spain worships the Universal God theologies which both the NT and Koran espouse. No Sanhedrin Court has jurisdiction to judge Capital Crimes cases outside the borders of the Torah defined oath sworn land inheritance of Canaan and as further defined within the expanded language of the Torah and clarified by Moshe Rabbeinu which requires expanded National territories include small Sanhedrin cities of refuge Capital Crimes courtrooms. Hence the Rambam notion of Universal 7 mitzvot applicable to all Goyim – an utter narishkeit as the NT dictate on the mitzva of Moshiach.

        The Rambam “world to come” as pie in the sky as the NT false messiah. Goyim not under Torah law. Therefore just as Americans do not determine Russian strategic interests to invade a Ukraine threatening to join NATO – especially after Napoleon and Hitler both invaded Russia through the flat plains of the Ukraine – so too Goyim, not under the law, do not determine Torah commandments, specifically in the NT case – the commandment of Moshiach.

        Torah common law stands the vision of “life in the word to come” based upon the Torah oath brit cut between the pieces wherein childless Avram swore and oath and in turn his local god El Shaddai swore an oath back to Avram. This concept of brit – totally alien to the Torah. Secondary sources like the NT or Koran do not supersede the Torah; anymore that Goyim who reject the Torah can qualify as ger tzeddik converts. The Pauline ‘graphed onto’ narishkeit equal to the Koran declaration of Yishmael bound upon the altar at the Akadah.

        The seven Noahide laws are presented in Jewish sources as a universal moral code binding on all humanity (the “descendants of Noah”), independent of the Land of Israel or the Sanhedrin’s geographic jurisdiction for Jewish capital cases. False. Violation of any of these 7 laws by a ger toshav constitutes as a Capital Crime Case that only the Sanhedrin courts can adjudicate. One of the 7 mitzvot requires gere toshav to establish courts of law. The Talmud does not mandate any court ger toshav in Judea the authority to adjudicate any Capital Crime case. Rather ger toshav courts limited to Torts damages courts like Jewish Torts courts in g’lut.

        Sanhedrin Capital Crimes courts inclusive of Small Sanhedrin courts in all cities of refuge as well as the Great Sanhedrin Court of 71, define the Torah mandated Federal Sanhedrin common law court system. The NaCree (language of the Torah)/Canaani (language of Baba Kama) refers strictly and only to despised refugee populations/Shomronim\Samaritans.

        No Sanhedrin court can put a “Bnai Noach” living in London or Paris or Berlin or Moscow to death. Violation of any of the 7 mitzvot therefore strictly and only apply to gere toshav living within the judicial domain of Sanhedrin Capital Crime courtrooms. Makkot 9a illustrates distinctions: a ger toshav who unintentionally kills another ger toshav is exiled (treated somewhat like a Jew), while killing a Jew leads to execution without exile—handled under Jewish judicial frameworks in the Land. Only Sanhedrin court justices have the Torah mandate to judge and try Capital Crimes Cases. The courts of Gere Toshav temporary residents do not have greater authority than Jewish Torts courts within the borders of Judea.

        The small Sanhedrin courts function as lower courts which permits appeal to the two Great Sanhedrin courts held within the Court of Hewn State within the Temple. Secondary sources of Talmudic scholarship made after the sealing of the T’NaCH, Mishna, Gemara, and Siddur exist as opinions. These secondary sources cannot over-ride nor negate sealed Primary sources. The Rambam statute halachic codes does just that, it equates his halachic posok rulings as if they stood upon their own merit. By stark and obvious contrast the Gemara halachot serve as precedent to interpret the language of the Mishna which that Gemara comments upon and nothing more. Herein separates T’NaCH\Talmudic common law from Roman & Rambam statute law.

        Aggada does not determine halacha – except in the opinion of the Rambam. Quoting Genesis 9:9–17 does not amount to squat. It amounts to a dream which has no interpretation; a letter never opened and read. Sanhedrin 56a–57a addresses Gere Toshav – based upon the Book of D’varim which differentiates two types of Goyim: Ger Toshav vs. NaCreeim. The Talmud restricted to these to classifications of Goyim within the borders of the Oath sworn lands.

        Sanhedrin 56–60, which treats these laws as pre‑Sinaitic and universal? Post Sinai revelation the Torah no longer perceives Torah as Universal/in the heavens above. תורה לא בשמים היא – represents a key fundamental of the revelation and acceptance by Israel of the Torah. The Book of בראשית does not over-ride the revelation of the Torah at Sinai, any more than can post sealing of the Sha’s Bavli Reshonim scholars can add to or subtract from the sealed Talmud.

        Only Israel accepts the revelation of the Torah at Sinai – to this very day. Torah common law post Reshonim opinions do not modify except to the limitations of the needs of that particular generations. Clearly the Dark Age social political and societal anarchy and chaos do not prevail today in any even near comparison to the darkest Ages of Xtian Europe under the Church Inquisition dictatorships.

        Pre-Sinaitic Universal ethics defines the 2nd Sinai commandment. Therefore any attempt to interpret 7 mitzvot bnai noach out of its Talmudic restriction which limits it to gere toshav temporary residents invalidates the Torah precedent in D’varim which separates giving treif meats as a gift vs selling this treif flesh to a Na’cree. The Baali Tosafot common law commentary on Avodah Zarah 64b – ger toshav exists only when Yovel observed supports this strong restriction against learning 7 mitzvot as Universal av tuma avoda zara commandments. The Yovel only applies to produce grown within the borders of the oath sworn lands.

        The revelation of the Torah at Sinai – mandates the Federal Sanhedrin Court system based upon the Torah serving as the Constitution of the Republic. Just as the Constitution of the US does not spread its Bill of Rights to Goyim living in foreign lands so too the Torah as the Constitution of the Cohen 12 Tribe Republic limited only to the borders of the oath sworn lands of this Republic. Therefore any post sealing of the Sha’s Bavli by Reshonim who seek to pervert the 1st Sinai revelation of the Name to some Universal God – like as expressed in the Av tuma avoda zara of both Xtianity and Islam – through ruling that the 7 mitzvot bnai noach apply Universally to all Goyim, such false instruction directly compares to av tuma false prophesy.

        Yet the church never accepted the authority of the Oral Torah codified in the Talmud and mesechta Sanhedrin in particular! Halacha only applicable to Jews not Goyim. Both the Church and Mosque developed their own unique religious codes of theological creed belief systems. Religion never has anything to do with the Sinai brit obligation to rule the oath sworn Cohen inheritance lands sworn to the Avot with judicial common law court room legislative review based upon Torah Constitutional mandate. Any attempt by Shomronim, Tzeddukim, Karaim, Xtians or Muslims to superimpose religious theology belief system as a replacement theology qualifies as the Torah definition of av tuma false prophets who seek to persuade Jews to worship other Gods.

      159. Call yourself what you like. Everything is temporary. Build up enough hate and you’ll be rulers of the underworld!

      163. stop calling yourself an oaf!
        My friend read your posts and said you weren’t fit to live with pigs! I stood up for you! I said you were!

      169. I think you’ll find we’ll all make good fertiliser eventually. Wars are good for fertiliser so are genocides!

      171. What a silly comment. It’s you who supports a government of fascists who kill babies daily! GAZA: 20,000 CHILDREN KILLED IN 23 MONTHS OF WAR – MORE THAN ONE CHILD KILLED EVERY HOUR – that’s you!

      176. The Modern Vision of Zionism

        Just as the Talmud builds a full beit midrash so too does the T’NaCH, as specifically proven in this one short Shir HaMa’alot example. Tehillim 120 not restricted to alienation, but inclusive of moral exile – speech uttered within and throughout a diseased and corrupted Government “Court” social reality. The Holy Writings of the T’NaCh literature of mussar common law function as external “case/din” mussar which – so to speak – interprets based upon different “witness” perspectives the “Prophetic” Case heard before the Sanhedrin Court.

        When speech becomes weaponized, society enters moral exile even if geographically sovereign. The geographic references in verse 5 (“Woe is me, that I sojourn with Meshech, that I dwell beside the tents of Kedar”) evoke foreign, hostile environments (Meshech linked to northern peoples, Kedar to Arabian nomads), yet the deeper pain is existential: prolonged dwelling “with him that hateth peace” (v. 6), where the speaker’s commitment to shalom meets only warlike response (v. 7: “I am all peace; but when I speak, they are for war”). This is not merely hysteria but the grammar of moral dislocation—a “dislocated moral refugee.” Study Tehillim 120 not as ascent from exile but as a cry voiced inside a corrupted social reality, including “diseased and corrupted Government ‘Court’” dynamics.

        Post-Bar Kokhba historical trauma—the mass slaughter, expulsion, and Hadrian’s renaming of Judea to Syria Palaestina (135 CE) and Jerusalem to Aelia Capitolina—embodied the shift from physical republic to existential/moral refugee status, paralleling the psalm’s “אוי לי כי גרתי משך” not as mere geography but as enduring alienation.

        By framing the Ketuvim Holy Writings as Gemara to the cited prophets’ Mishna, this sh’itta of learning validates the פרדס kabbalah taught by rabbi Akiva. The organization of the Talmud into a loom-like warp/weft:halacha\aggada wherein דרוש\פשט affix to the aggadic portions of the Talmud, while the רמז\סוד halachic portions of the Talmud “conceal/hide” the judicial vision from the Goyim enemy/censors. Much like the later Rashi commentary to the Chumash – common law precedent based sh’itta radically differs from the Rashi commentary to the Talmud dictionary-p’shat conceals the common law judicial nature of the Talmud. Hence this forced the Baali-Tosafot to write a common law commentary to the Talmud; but even those some 60 Baali-Tosafot did not extend their off the dof precedent case/din study back to make a משנה תורה re-evaluation of the language of the Home Mishna which the Gemara learns through case/rule similar precedents.

        The רשע Rambam Yad statute law commentary to the Talmud directly duplicates the sh’itta of the Shomronim/Canaanites, Tzeddukim, Karaites, NT, Koran – all of who deny the Oral Torah revelation of tohor middot as the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. Where the שם השם לשמה occupied the Yatzir Ha-Tov hearts of the Cohen brit people rather than the Heavens above – like as do the Divine Names אל שדי, אלהים, אל, האל imply. The post Sinai most essential concept of faith: תורה, לא בשמים היא, the First Commandment (greatest of all Torah commandments) defines.

        The Rambam code simply does not qualify as Oral Torah common law but rather expresses the foreign Roman statute law sh’itta of learning. The main consequent impact of the Rambam Civil War, Jewish scholars ceased or forgot that משנה תורה refers to Common Law which defines the k’vanna of the Book דברים. Anglo-American common law perhaps based upon T’NaCH-Talmudic common law, and not the reverse.

        Rambam saved the Hebrew language with his code written in clear precise Hebrew. His rationalist theology “converted” the sealed masoret into a far more palatable format far less threatening to both the church and mosque. Early in the 20th Century the Czar attempted to restrict Yeshiva learning which prioritized the Yad rather than the Talmud. None the less, statute law static deductive reasoning akin to plain geometry. Whereas T’NaCH-Talmud literature communicates פרדס inductive reasoning logic; a flowing dynamic logic that differs from Greek deductive reasoning like Calculus variables differ from Arabraic Algebra; 19th Century hyperbolic geometry repudiates the 5th axiom of Euclid’s plain geometry.

        Off the דרך mainstream Judaism failed to correct the assimilated error of the Rambam’s statute law. The Catholic church during this same period incorporated statute law codification of Catholic dogma quite similar to the Rambam’s halachic codification which changed perverted corrupted Oral Torah judicial common law into religious statute law with prioritizes the false parameter of an Ego based “I believe” religious belief system substitute replacement of Sanhedrin judicial courtroom common law as model by the Framers of both the T’NaCH and Talmud.

        The Rambam code stands apart from the B’HaG and Rif common law codes. His corruption failure to bring sources for his halachic rulings, all later super-commentaries on both his code perversion and similar Tur and Shulkan Aruch statute law perversions failed to correct. For example the כסף משנה speculative attempts to unilaterally bring a Gemara source for the Rambam posok halacha – complete tits on a boar hog useless. No post Rambam super commentary ever affixed a Rambam posok to either a B’HaG, Rif, Rosh similar halacha wherein the latter affix that halachic ruling back to its proper Mishnaic source. Gemara always exists as a commentary to specific Mishnaic sources – always. This off the דרך error of statute law halachic codes set the stage for the Orthodox failure to make massive aliya to Palestine prior to the 2nd White Paper in 1939. The off the דרך Orthodox Judaism as guilty as the Wilderness generation in the days of Moshe and Aaron.

        Courtroom common law ie Oral Torah simply not religious belief system statute law. The earlier halachic codifications maintained fidelity to Oral Torah common law’s relationship between Mishna & Gemara as courtroom law. The framers of the Talmud vision, to write a legal model for the day when Jews reconquered our homeland from the Romans. Who could envision that the g’lut who last 2000+ years?! Prior to the Oct 7th 2023 Abomination War, court reform exploded as a government crisis! Restoration of the Torah as the Written Constitution of the Torah Republic organized into 12 tribal states with the Talmudic model Sanhedrin common law lateral courtroom system alive today as envisioned by the framers of the Talmud.

        Critics of theocratic models argue that a pluralistic democracy, with its secular Basic Laws and independent judiciary, better serves a diverse population facing existential security threats, while proponents counter that the Rambam perversion which “baptized” Oral Torah into Roman statute law avoda zara, fail to grasp that the Rambam Civil War changed the vision of the Framers of both T’NaCH and Talmudic common law. G’lut Jewry of the Middle Ages required a modification of Talmud into a Jewish religion. Modern Israeli society absolutely requires the sense of trust which Sanhedrin lateral courts raise the banner of justice as defined by fair restitution of damages.

        Orthodox proponents of the Rambam code ignore the fundamental difference between T’NaCH-Talmudic inductive logic from Ancient Greek-most European societal based deductive reasoning. The pre-Oct7th Judicial debates across Israel debates primarily focused upon cult of personality issues and totally ignored the day/night differences between Oral Torah inductive logic from Greek/European deductive logic; the latter logic format defines the Rambam statute religious law codification made during the Dark Ages.

        Claims made by Rambam which declared it as a complete statement of Oral Torah totally untrue; proof stands: whenever a person studies Talmud today, the statute law codes of the Rambam error do not comment as does the Baali Tosafot commentary to the Talmud upon how to correctly understand the intent of the language of the Talmud. Hence the statute law codes not included on the page of the Talmud as the Vilna Sha’s includes both Rashi and Baali Tosafot. Bottom line: Oral Torah does not teach Greek-like philosophy.

        The Yad explicitly frames the work as a comprehensive restatement of the entire Oral Law. Both the court of Rabbeinu Yonah and the majority of the Baali Tosafot placed the Rambam into נידוי no different than the later רשע Spinoza. The disaster Paris burnings of 1242 coupled with the 1306 French mass Jewish expulsion permanently destroyed the French common law school of Talmudic scholarship. All super-commentaries written after the Rosh, starting with the Tur base themselves upon deductive statute law reasoning. Akin to how Congress limits individual debates to 15 minutes. Courtroom law requires that both the Prosecutor and Defense close their arguments – at their own determined pace.

        The interplay between the physical destruction of Jewish textual heritage in 13th- and 14th-century France and the enduring symbolic battles over Maimonides’ legacy—including a documented alteration of his tomb inscription—illustrates the complex, often polarized communal sentiments that persisted long after his death in 1204. The 1242 burning of Talmud manuscripts and the 1306 expulsion from France indeed eradicated enormous quantities of evidence, compounding the challenges of reconstructing the full picture of medieval Jewish intellectual life.

        Provençal scholar David Kimhi (c. 1160–1235) and the lingering effects of the 1232–1233 bans on his philosophical writings—opponents altered the stone to read “the excommunicated heretic” (מוחרם ומין). Heinrich Graetz’s monumental Geschichte der Juden (History of the Jews, 1853–1875; English editions 1891–1895) devotes extensive chapters to the Maimonidean controversy, the Paris Disputation of 1240, the Talmud burnings of 1242, and the philosophical divides between rationalists and traditionalists. Similarly, Simon Dubnow’s multi-volume histories (Weltgeschichte des jüdischen Volkes, 1925–1929, and earlier Russian works) analyze medieval Jewish intellectual currents, the French expulsions, and Rambam’s legacy in detail, framing the controversy as part of broader Ashkenazi-Sephardi tensions.

        The Maimonidean Controversy ended in France around the 1306 expulsion, which dispersed communities and halted further documentation. But the ‘domino effect’ of this Jewish Civil War produced internal Jewish chaos and anarchy which invited British and German taxation without representation followed by mass Jewish forced expulsions which culminated in the 3 Century Pope Bull which imposed ghetto gulags and the 1492 expulsion from Spain, followed by the Inquisition and the 1648 Ukrainian Cossack pogroms.

        Foreign invasions traditionally follow internal domestic chaos and anarchy. Rome made Herod king over Judea due to Jewish Civil War. Troskii based his theory of ‘Permanent Revolution’ based upon the model of how the French revolution spread to all surrounding countries who likewise confronted internal chaos and anarchy. Post the Rambam Civil War scholars do not address the subject of Roman law, understood through lenses of legal classifications similar to the organization of a dozen eggs sold in a supermarket.

        A political-legal application to modern Israeli constitutional debates? The revelation of 13 tohor middot at Horev to Moshe Rabbeinu serve as the basis for the Tannaim middot logic formats 7 Hillel, 10 Akiva, and 13 Yishmael affixed to Halacha and the 32 of rabbi Yossi assigned to Aggadic portions of the Talmud. The משנה תורה בנין אב for all these distinct and different middot formats – the revelation expressed through the first Sinai commandment Torah לא בשמים היא which remembers the Egyptian oppression of depriving Israel of the required straw to make bricks. Employment of middot as the “building-block” of inductive פרדס reasoning differentiates T’NaCH/Talmudic common-law from Greek\Roman statute law which organizes decrees made by authorities such as Caesar or Napoleon into defined legal categories. The Six Orders of the Mishna represents an entirely different structured Order than Greek\Roman Statute law codes.

        Tehillem 120 expresses a deep sense of alienation, highlighting the emotional turmoil of living amidst deceitful and hostile individuals. The language underscores a societal environment where trust no longer exists. The concluding verse, “אני שלום וכי אדבר המה למלחמה,” illustrates how words can become weapons, further emphasizing the conflict inherent in social interactions where “peace” employed as a deception-mask which hides and conceals Jealousy and צר עיין.

        Yarmia 9:2–8: explores the pervasive dishonesty and the metaphorical use of the “sword” לשון הרע. Isaiah 59:3–8 – reinforces the ideas of systemic deceit and societal breakdown as communicated in Tehillem 120. Particularly the notion of absolutely no trust/shalom due to the false faces of falsehood.

        Micah 7:1–6 – the untrustworthiness of those closest, this reflects the emotional landscape of navigating relationships marked by betrayal and conflict. Therefore, Tehillem 120 serves as a poignant reflection on the realities of trust and alienation within social spaces, functioning as a precedential text that situates itself within a broader prophetic discourse on integrity and relational dynamics. It highlights the limitations of ordinary communication in the face of systemic dishonesty, aligning closely with the emotional truths expressed in the prophetic literature surrounding it.

        What makes Tehillim 120 so distinctive within the Shir HaMa’alot corpus: it is not a psalm of ascent from exile but a psalm spoken inside a moral exile. Alienation, relational distortion, the collapse of trust, and the weaponization of speech—captures the emotional grammar of this specific Tehillem. To learn the Holy Writings within the T’NaCH requires the Oral Torah discipline: Prophetic/Mishnaic NaCH → Holy Writings\Gemara format encapsulated in both the T’NaCH primary source and Talmudic secondary source literature. Failure to grasp just how the Tannaim and Amoraim influenced by the T’NaCH as the Primary source which dominated their interpretation of Torah common law as expressed through the Mishna and contemporary Tannaic sources of that period during the days prior to the Bar Kokhba revolt against Rome which resulted in the mass population slaughter and transfer of the survivor Jewish populations from Judea and the renaming of the destroyed Jewish second republic unto the alien European name of Palestine; followed later still by Amoraim scholars in Bavil who compiled and organized the Gemara as a common law compilation of Case/Din precedents by which to weight the Case\Rule Mishnaic common law legal compilation made by rabbi Yechuda Ha-Nassi in about 210 CE.

        אוי לי כי גרתי משך not geographic but rather existential. 120 communicates not merely distressed hysteria; but more accurately a dislocated—moral refugee. שפת שקר… לשון רמיה … not one specific liar—but rather a culture of duplicity. חצי גיבור שנונים—not simply a metaphorical flourish, but rather a legal description of speech-as-violence. אני שלום… המה למלחמה peace-talk is interpreted as aggression in a society built on suspicion. No different than the UN British-French-Russia “dictate” for land for peace” post the 1967 War. This hostile foreign propaganda so conveniently ignores the Nasser command to his generals to complete the Nazi Shoah of European Jewry across the obliterated lands of Israel based upon the Roman Palestine model!

        “Mishnaic” Yarmia 9:2-8, the Primary source Tehillem 120 “Gemara” analogue secondary source. The mussar cummunicated in such a “Talmudic learning” views both mussar sources address 1. weaponized speech; 2. systemic deceit; 3. relational breakdown; 4. no trust. Yarmia 9, not merely parallel—but more accurately the Tehillem 120 commentary grasps the blue-print multidimensional facet viewpoint legal categories viewed from this precedent Tehillem “witness”. This “Talmudic” learning serves to define the phenomenon: a society where speech has become a weapon and trust is impossible.

        The structural diagnosis of Tehillem 120 precedent to Isaiah 59:38, specifically to 1. lying lips 2. absence of justice 3. no path to trust/shalom 4. crooked social structures. This Primary source prophetic Mishna functions as the macro version while the Gemara Tehillim 120 precedent operates as the micro (כלל-פרט) example of how the kabbalah of פרדס studies both T’NaCH and Talmudic literature as codified in the Talmud Yerushalmi in Judea and Bavli post renamed as Roman Palestine in Iraqi exile.

        Micah 7:16, the Tehillem 120 precedent views this Primary NaCH source from the witness perspective testimony before a “Sanhedrin” courtroom of: intimate betrayal. This Micah Mishnaic Prophetic Primary source interpreted by Tehillem 120 from the dimension of – NO TRUST even in owns own household; meaning betrayal by intimates which forces the right hand to conceal its intentions from its left hand because relational proximity only increases personal danger. Tehillem 120 “gemara” explains the “Mishnaic” Micah 7 through the lenses of emotional tones where the pain experienced and felt not limited to public humiliation but rather intimate disgrace.

        The Holy Writings of the T’NaCH, expressed through Tehillem 120 duplicates how the Gemara learns the Mishna by bringing similar Case/Rule precedents wherein the style of “Difficulty\Answer” expresses the courtroom Prosecutor vs Defense Attorney legal briefs which bring different legal precedents and therefore debate between them which “set of precedent cases” presented before the Court qualifies as the closes set of valid precedents to best determine the din for the current case heard before the Court. Hence a Torts court has 3 Court justices; one appointed as the prosecutor the other appointed as the defense attorney, and the third rules whenever neither Judge of the court validates the precedents brought by his opposing judicial collegues legal brief. The Talmud refers to this legal impass as taku. Such a legal impass the 3rd court justice rules either one way or the other. Hence all lateral common law Torah courts have an odd number of judges.

        T’NaCH\Talmudic “sovereignty” Civic not theological. This scholarship argues, much like as did Herzl’s “Jewish State” for Jewish equal rights to achieve self-determination through establishment of the Cohen Republic of the Avot. The Herzl assimilated versions of a Jewish state primarily in political-national terms, & most definitely not religious Rambam-halachic formats. The foreign model based heavily from European parliamentary systems, akin to a woman’s menstrual pad. Herzl’s Jewish equal rights to achieve Jewish self determination, as later defined and clarified by the Balfour and League 1922 mandate to establish a Jewish national home. Serves as the political model to forge the Written Torah as the Constitution of the Republic of States/tribes, which mandates Sanhedrin Capital Crimes and Torts courts which function akin to spokes on a wheel. Where small Sanhedrin Cities of Refuge define the borders of the Jewish state.

        The Mishnah’s Six Orders are thematic categories of law. They are not territorial allocations of sovereignty. Converting them into a territorial federal map would require new constitutional engineering determined by the Sanhedrin as the Constitutional Court. Similar to Constitutional courts which operate in civil law countries which likewise through Constitutional mandate ‘Legislative Review’. The Yerushalmi Talmud debates whether king David Nationalized Damascus the establishment of a small Sanhedrin court of 23 City of Refuge; territorial authority requires judicial institutionalization. Sovereignty without courts – incomplete.

        Sanhedrin common law courts review legislation passed by Tribal & Federal governments. Determines conformity with Torah constitutional norms. Defines Federal divisions of power, something akin to the US Commerce Clause. Anointed, based upon Moshe’s dedication of the House of Aaron – the dedication of the Torah mitzva of Moshiach: based upon David’s vain-oath פרט, (touching the כלל dedication to rule the land with judicial justice) expressed through his bloody hands in the matter of Uriah the Hittite.

        Legislative powers such as monetary policy, bureaucratic regulatory agencies primarily restricted to Tribal economic autonomy rather than to some Big Brother Federal overview. For example: telecommunications or international trade etc. The Sanhedrin would inevitably develop interpretive doctrines expanding constitutional text into modern governance domains. That is already a form of constitutional evolution — similar to modern jurisprudence.

        The Torah model of Moshiach, absolutely rejects Goyim cult of personality Gods or prophets! Prophets’ functions as the police enforcers of Judicial court-room rulings chiefly through means of public prophetic mussar. Just as Sanhedrin jurisdiction limited to within the borders of the Jewish state, so too prophet/police.

        Prophets in no way shape or form compare to sooth sayers/witches who predict the future; anymore than prophet sent to Goyim in foreign lands based upon the precedents of Moshe and Yonah. The king of Assyria not the target of Yonah’s mussar. Rather, the g’lut Israelites captured following the collapse of the kingdom of Israel! Torah rejects both “sister religions” as Molach or Baal av tumah avoda zarah.

        A Torah Republic not the same as an ancient Athens democracy. The Book of שפטים serves as precedent. The US model, for example, no where in both its Constitutions, nor its Declaration of Independence – the word democracy ever written. The mussar of the Book of Shmuel openly rebukes Israel for demanding a king. A Torah Constitutional Republic the “Moshiach” משל has the נמשל interpretation which assigns this mitzva as no different than the mitzva of keeping shabbat. All bnai brit Israel have equal obligations to both wisdom commandments/time-oriented commandments throughout the generations.

        The sealed masoret serves as the ‘Basic Law’ for Sanhedrin courts procedural statutes, enforcement authority, mechanisms for constitutional amendment, and mechanisms for removal of judges.

        Shabbat observance organized into wisdom מלאכה which requires k’vanna from toldot positive & negative commandments – inclusive of Talmudic halachot which do not require k’vanna but serve as בניני אבות precedent which elevate toldot commandments/halachot to av time-oriented commandments. Just as shabbat prioritizes “domains” so too does the 6 Orders of the Mishna.

        Just as Yosef’s mockery of his brothers through divination an abomination so too false prophets who seek to entice Israel to embrace foreign cultures and intermarry and most emphatically seek to entice Israel to worship new or foreign Gods. Israel compares to a drop which falls into an ocean; the burden to define and maintain the culture, customs, manners, and habits which separate the chosen Cohen children of the Avot as “t’rumah” from the chol seed of the Avot who fathered a multitude of Goyim; herein defines the substance of the Torah as Constitution which mandate Sanhedrin common law courts.

        Modern constitutions survive because they include amendment procedures. פרדס logic fluid dynamic and flexible. Righteous judicial justice dedicated similar to the Moshiach, to fair restitution of damages inflicted by Jews upon other bnai brit allies/citizens – inclusive of gere toshav Goyim. Moshiach as a Torah mitzva functions as a constitutional ethic, not an executive throne. NaCH prophets often served as the Torah removal mechanism of institutionalized power abuse/corruption.

        Moshiach = constitutional ethic of just rule; Prophets = institutional correction mechanism; public moral rebuke as key removal trigger. Torah = constitutional charter; Sanhedrin = constitutional Federal court system. Prophets, based upon the precedent of Shmuel, did not themselves depose rulers. The blessing/curse brit causes Life or Death just as in the days of Par’o and the 10 plagues. Prophets serve the judicial משנה תורה rulings of the Great Sanhedrin court. Prophesy simply the exorcise of civic conscience. The removal of Rabban Gamliel as Nassi serves as a precedent of “Who removes a corrupt Sanhedrin justice”. Peers dedicated to the pursuit of righteous justice removed Rabban Gamliel not a prophet.

        Authority in Torah jurisprudence – not absolute. Institutional abuse can trigger removal. Correction – internal, not prophetic overthrow. Sanhedrin justice requires as its fundamental basis a combine tribal-federal judicial convention. Herein functions a model for the Constitutional Republic of Israel as the definition of Zionism: Jewish right to achieve self-determination within the borders of the Jewish state. This Constitutional order despises judicial absolutism as equal to the Dark Ages ‘divine right of kings’ narishkeit. The tribal/federal model permits tribal courts participation in both appointments and removal similar to how US State legislatures originally appoint Federal Senators as ambassadors of each and every State represented in the Senate.

        The modern Jewish state not a primitive agrarian-based economy which requires slavery. But an industrial based economy where the State protects citizen rights. Post ’48 & ’67 Israel respects the political accomplishments of the American and to a far smaller degree the French revolution(s). But rejects the Marx 1848 Das Capital socialism as utterly corrupt and flawed. On par with the European Central Banking model which the traitor Wilson copied and forced America make entangling alliances with Europe! Adam Smith’s free banking model the economic ideal for a healthy Torah constitutional republic. Who stabilizes the economy during external crises (war, global capital shocks, or trade embargo)? The tribal and Federal legislatures and/or Knesset “bear the yoke of the kingdom of heaven”. A gold\diamond-based commodity currency serves as the Constitutional ideal. The Federal government compares to the power of Congress to mint currency.

      179. Quite the contrary really. Strangely you are very Trumpian – you accuse others of the very things you do in the way Trump does.

      181. I know – he’s an authoritarian fascist too – with limited cognitive power, poor education and a low IQ. Can barely read. I’ll type slowly for you…

      182. Your opinion just shit.

        Research suggests shared anti-colonial themes with Palestinian struggles, but direct parallels are interpretive; Sands focused on political status in UK prisons, not territorial sovereignty like Palestinian claims.

        Bobby Sands, a member of the Provisional Irish Republican Army (IRA), died on May 5, 1981. As an Israeli who condemns the illegal occupation of Northern Ireland by the British, I made a 6 Day support hunger strike, Shabbat to Shabbat no food and no water. Years later, while learning in Yeshiva made a second Shabbat to Shabbat hunger strike in protest against the Rabin ‘peace plan’. The British/French Two State “Solution” directly compares to the Nazi “Final Solution”. Never Again! Post Shoah oath sworn by Israeli Jews to ever again permit Europeans to dictate Jewish Problem solutions.

        Bobby Sand’s hunger strike unto death, emblematic of the fight against perceived oppression and injustice. His refusal of food, a potent act of defiance, underscored the desperation of those within the Northern Irish prison system. Sands and his fellow strikers sought recognition not merely as criminals as British propaganda promoted, but as political prisoners fighting against colonial rule.

        Bobby Sands and other hunger strikers in Northern Ireland framed their struggle for political recognition and autonomy in terms similar to the language used regarding “occupied territories,” drawing parallels between their situation and that of Palestinians in areas like Samaria and Gaza. This comparison is often seen as part of broader narratives around occupation and resistance in both contexts.

        Common law stands upon open debate between the precedents brought by the prosecution and defense attorney judicial brief. Obviously all precedents do not exactly duplicate the current case heard before the court. The Bobby Sands IRA opposition to British “nationalization” of Northern Ireland compares to the UN condemnation of Jordan’ss “nationalization” of the West Bank in 1950.

        The comparison to UN anti Israel Resolutions started with the genesis of post June 1967 War where France prior to the outbreak of that war made a arms embargo against Israel and England declared its neutrality. Yet both countries, once obvious that the Arabs had lost demanded an immediate cease fire. The cease-fire that ended hostilities, primarily enforced by the United Nations through diplomatic pressure. The UN Security Council did not impose a Cease-Fire after 6 Days of War, comparable to the British propaganda which white-washed Sands as merely a “criminal”.

        The red-herring propaganda which depicts PLO\PA/Hamas struggles as most essentially related to land rights and statehood completely and utterly false. Arafat’s rejection of Clinton’s “peace” conclusively proves that the Arabs view Jews as dhimmi sub-class that has no rights to self-determination. The famous Three-NOs post June War coupled with the Hamas multiple wars against Israel post their election victory where the slaughtered and expelled Arafat’s PA, not only proved his claim that the PLO functioned as the sole representative of the Palestinian people but Hamas in conjunction with Arafat initiation of the 2nd Intafada distinctly proves that a Palestinian state merely a pretext to complete the Nazi Shoah of Jews in the Middle East which leaders in both the ’48 and ’67 wars trumpeted.

        Clearly the domestic politics of the PA and Hamas or Islamic Jihad differ from one another. But the hatred of the continued existence of the Jewish state, at least in the minds of Israelis who have witnessed bus bombings of children school buses merits deep consideration. Israeli strategic foreign policy views Saudi Arabia as the chief cornerstone of the acceptance of Israel by Arab countries as viable partners in the community of Middle Eastern states. This vision remains as the key Israeli foreign policy to integrate the Jewish state into the Middle East.

        Equating the two-state solution to the Nazi Final Solution clearly requires honest debate. The ’48 cease fire lines left an exposed Jewish state with a narrow 9 miles waste-line enticement for further invasions with the goal to throw the Jews into the Sea. All Arab Israeli wars fought on multiple fronts. Hitler condemned the Kaiser’s defeat due to a two front war! Syrian control over the Golan Heights permitted Syrian bombardments of Tiberias Galilee.

        Jordanian defilement of Jewish grave-stones and destruction of ancient Jewish synagogues has permanent consequences. Israeli victories in wars against multiple Arab countries has enforced the Will of our people to embrace the strategy of Patton. Patton’s rebuke of Montgomery: “We should be fighting on the continent, not on this island,” emphasizing his belief that the focus should be on decisive movements in Europe rather than getting bogged down in prolonged engagements in specific areas.

        The UN/Quartet appeasement of Arab hostility repeatedly expressed through the treatment of Israel as a protectorate territory rather than an Independent State who twice won its National Independence through Wars. These foreign imperialist powers not only promote the lie that the UN “created Israel”, they seek to dominate and control the balance of power across the Middle East! They pretend to this very day that ‘they’ determine the national borders of the Jewish state and where Jews in Israel can determine the Capital City of our country. Only Israel among all UN member States excluded as a recognized member of their own region! This UN Apartheid racism – stinks.

        Hamas’s charter historically rejects Israel’s existence, viewing it as illegal occupation. No different from the PLO charter which declares only ’48 Israel and not the UN condemned illegal Jordanian nationalization of the “West Bank”. The post 1922 Mandate awarded as “spoils of war” to the British witnessed the almost immediate separation of Trans-Jordan from its “Palestine Mandate” at the Jordan river.

        Furthermore, Arafat’s initiation of the 2nd Intifada following the Oslo Accords established the 3 zones of Samaria, further supports Israel fundamental distrust of “Palestinian war propaganda”. Israelis like myself tend to the view that Arabs learn to lie and steal straight from their mothers’ milk; comparable to the ‘Quartet’ language of peace as merely an empty noun/rhetoric rather than shalom as a verb which stands upon the foundation of trust. Repeated attempts by foreign states outside the Region, to dictate and/or dominate the narrative, the continuous stream of UN anti-Israel condemnations, forces Jerusalem to view declarations made by foreign states which share no border with the Jewish state as extremely suspect.

        All Arab/Israeli Wars fought not over “borders” but rather Arab absolute rejection of dhimmi Jews possession of equal rights to achieve self-determination in the Middle East. The 1917 Balfour Declaration and the 1922 League of Nations Mandate awarded to post WWI Britain, based upon the central premise to establish a Jewish National Home in Palestine.

        Zionist Jews immediately denounced this first 1922\23 White Paper, which pales in comparison to the British betrayal of Chamberlain’s Nazi Appeasement policies which later betrayed both the Czech Republic in 1938, and a year later imposed a blockade of Palestine to prevent Jews the avenue to escape from the Nazis. This 2nd White Paper had a tremendous impact upon Washington! Contrast the open door policy where pre WWI Washington invited Jewish refugees fleeing from the death spiral collapse of Czarist Autocracy of 3 Centuries duration (about equal to the ghetto gulags the Catholic Church imposed upon Western European Jewry) to FDR’s decision to close the borders of the US to prevent Jewish refugees to flee from the Nazis.

        The post-June 1967 War context, where France’s arms embargo and Britain’s neutrality shifted following the Arab defeat, highlights attempts by these two defeated former ‘Great Powers’ to re-impose their domination of the balance of power in the Middle East following their post 1956 failed attempt to seize control of Nasser’s Suez Canal!

        UN resolutions as a form of perceived “apartheid” illustrates a sentiment that resonates with many who feel marginalized in discussions about their national identity. The insistence that foreign powers dictate borders and political statuses — provoke significant anger and resentment, particularly in the context of a nation that has fought for its existence through multiple Wars consequent to British imperialism which promoted from day ONE of their British “Palestine Mandate” a divide & conquer “gospel” which likewise exploded in multiple wars fought between the India Pakistan British Two-State Solution/imperialism.

        All Arab/Israeli Wars fought over Arab rejection of the Balfour Declaration/League – Palestine Mandate. Arab countries view “dhimmi Jews” on par with failed Crusader States of the Middle Ages! Britain nor France ever a “neutral power” in Middle East and North African Sahel-MENA, despite the collapse of both empires across the world. Their colonial ambitions shaped many of the political and social structures that persist today. The ongoing interventions and pressures from these nations often manifest in support for certain regimes or factions, solidifying their roles as active players rather than neutral observers. This involvement has contributed to entrenched conflicts, making it challenging for the region to achieve self-determination. Hence Britain and the later EU share an open alliance against the continued existence of the Jewish State.

        During the Oct7th 2023 Abomination War, both countries sided with the South African blood libel slander which falsely accuses Israel of genocide. Contrast the British guilt during the invasion of Iraq that killed some 650,000 Iraqis and resulted in millions of wounded which threw Iraq and later Libya into utter chaos and anarchy.

        French imperialism stand out through the criminal war crimes in both Algeria and Vietnam! Accusations made against Israel accusing it of genocide/Nazism exposed the repeated racial anti-Jew Christ Killer themes which culminated in the European Shoah slaughter of 75% of Western European Jewry in less than three years of Europe’s 2nd General Civil War of the 20th Century.

        The leadership of President Trump’s Abraham Accords achieved in his first Administration and his Gaza Peace Board reject British and French imperialism which initiated their Two State Solution UN 242, 338, etc “dictates”; wherein the UN Frames the Two State Solution as the only viable way to achieve peace in the Middle East political rhetoric propaganda. Post the Oct7th Hamas defeat the UN, Britain, France, Russia, “Quartet” excluded from the Board of Peace. While Saudi Arabia sits together with Israel on this board of Peace! This accomplishment represents a radical and total rejection of the post ’67 attempts by these hostile imperialist 2nd rate powers to dictate terms imposed upon the Jewish state which seek to return Jewish international border to the post ’48 cease fire lines.

        Debates among historians who often frame the Middle East conflict viewed through the lenses of statehood and territorial sovereignty while ignoring that States have interests rather than friendships, invalidates post war “historical” comments made by foreign peoples not directly touched by the wars fought. Something akin to an American citizen condemning Putin’s war to prevent the Ukraine joining the NATO alliance completely oblivious due to a shallow reactionary understanding that Russia permanently shaped by two European invasions of Russia through the flat plains of the Ukraine. Reactionary ignorance on this scale resembles the Cuban missile crisis during the Kennedy Administration.

        The UN and ICC open condemnation of Israel for genocide exposes foreign state hostile diplomacy of “genocide” compared to the Nazi Shoah. As the trivialization of the Shoah, 80 years after these war crimes against humanity. No different from how Turkish diplomacy minimizes the Armenian Genocide.

        The Arab propaganda which emphasizes the false pie in the sky claim of “focus on ending occupation and achieving statehood” hides and conceals the cold hard FACT – post the 1948 Independence War the League of Nations AND UN Protectorate of Palestine ceased to exist. Furthermore, this Arab lie conceals that the Ottoman empire referred to this region of its empire as: “Greater Syria”; the Sick Man of Europe being bankrupt relied upon European cartographers to make maps of 19th Century Ottoman ‘Greater Syria’. During the entire British mandate, all Arabs unilaterally rejected the Balfour foundation of the League Palestine mandate. In point of FACT, Arabs cannot even pronounce the letter P of this foreign European word!

        Arab “Filastin” embraces the defunct Roman imperialism which changed Judea unto the European word “Palestine”. The renaming of Judea to Palestine by both Greek and Roman European empires exactly matches the interests of Arab propaganda today. Had Ben Gurion named the new Jewish State Palestine, the Palestine Post would not be the Jerusalem Post today!

        The UN partition plan – 181 rejected consequent to all Arab state refusal. Modern revisionist history by Quartet hostile powers and Arab states “acceptance” of 181 – utter pie in the sky non sense. Israeli Independence permanently terminated the influence of 181. 1948 simply not 2026 not for Arab Israeli disputes nor any other country in the annuls of history. Arab and Quartet attempts to “internationalize” the Arab/Israeli dispute only expose their State interests of imperialism.

      183. So that justifies war crimes and genocide? You love your authoritarian dictators – like Hitler, Franco and Mussolini, Oban, Modi, Bolsonaro and Trump. I think they are all a bunch of warmongering narcissists, greedy with sociopathic tendencies.

      184. You keep farting European war crimes which a court convicted and equating that vile permanent disgrace with Israel. Fuck you. You aint a court. Only an arrogant self centered egocentric fool.

        Research suggests shared anti-colonial themes with Palestinian struggles, but direct parallels are interpretive; Sands focused on political status in UK prisons, not territorial sovereignty like Palestinian claims.

        Bobby Sands, a member of the Provisional Irish Republican Army (IRA), died on May 5, 1981. As an Israeli who condemns the illegal occupation of Northern Ireland by the British, I made a 6 Day support hunger strike, Shabbat to Shabbat no food and no water. Years later, while learning in Yeshiva made a second Shabbat to Shabbat hunger strike in protest against the Rabin ‘peace plan’. The British/French Two State “Solution” directly compares to the Nazi “Final Solution”. Never Again! Post Shoah oath sworn by Israeli Jews to ever again permit Europeans to dictate Jewish Problem solutions.

        Bobby Sand’s hunger strike unto death, emblematic of the fight against perceived oppression and injustice. His refusal of food, a potent act of defiance, underscored the desperation of those within the Northern Irish prison system. Sands and his fellow strikers sought recognition not merely as criminals as British propaganda promoted, but as political prisoners fighting against colonial rule.

        Bobby Sands and other hunger strikers in Northern Ireland framed their struggle for political recognition and autonomy in terms similar to the language used regarding “occupied territories,” drawing parallels between their situation and that of Palestinians in areas like Samaria and Gaza. This comparison is often seen as part of broader narratives around occupation and resistance in both contexts.

        Common law stands upon open debate between the precedents brought by the prosecution and defense attorney judicial brief. Obviously all precedents do not exactly duplicate the current case heard before the court. The Bobby Sands IRA opposition to British “nationalization” of Northern Ireland compares to the UN condemnation of Jordan’ss “nationalization” of the West Bank in 1950.

        The comparison to UN anti Israel Resolutions started with the genesis of post June 1967 War where France prior to the outbreak of that war made a arms embargo against Israel and England declared its neutrality. Yet both countries, once obvious that the Arabs had lost demanded an immediate cease fire. The cease-fire that ended hostilities, primarily enforced by the United Nations through diplomatic pressure. The UN Security Council did not impose a Cease-Fire after 6 Days of War, comparable to the British propaganda which white-washed Sands as merely a “criminal”.

        The red-herring propaganda which depicts PLO\PA/Hamas struggles as most essentially related to land rights and statehood completely and utterly false. Arafat’s rejection of Clinton’s “peace” conclusively proves that the Arabs view Jews as dhimmi sub-class that has no rights to self-determination. The famous Three-NOs post June War coupled with the Hamas multiple wars against Israel post their election victory where the slaughtered and expelled Arafat’s PA, not only proved his claim that the PLO functioned as the sole representative of the Palestinian people but Hamas in conjunction with Arafat initiation of the 2nd Intafada distinctly proves that a Palestinian state merely a pretext to complete the Nazi Shoah of Jews in the Middle East which leaders in both the ’48 and ’67 wars trumpeted.

        Clearly the domestic politics of the PA and Hamas or Islamic Jihad differ from one another. But the hatred of the continued existence of the Jewish state, at least in the minds of Israelis who have witnessed bus bombings of children school buses merits deep consideration. Israeli strategic foreign policy views Saudi Arabia as the chief cornerstone of the acceptance of Israel by Arab countries as viable partners in the community of Middle Eastern states. This vision remains as the key Israeli foreign policy to integrate the Jewish state into the Middle East.

        Equating the two-state solution to the Nazi Final Solution clearly requires honest debate. The ’48 cease fire lines left an exposed Jewish state with a narrow 9 miles waste-line enticement for further invasions with the goal to throw the Jews into the Sea. All Arab Israeli wars fought on multiple fronts. Hitler condemned the Kaiser’s defeat due to a two front war! Syrian control over the Golan Heights permitted Syrian bombardments of Tiberias Galilee.

        Jordanian defilement of Jewish grave-stones and destruction of ancient Jewish synagogues has permanent consequences. Israeli victories in wars against multiple Arab countries has enforced the Will of our people to embrace the strategy of Patton. Patton’s rebuke of Montgomery: “We should be fighting on the continent, not on this island,” emphasizing his belief that the focus should be on decisive movements in Europe rather than getting bogged down in prolonged engagements in specific areas.

        The UN/Quartet appeasement of Arab hostility repeatedly expressed through the treatment of Israel as a protectorate territory rather than an Independent State who twice won its National Independence through Wars. These foreign imperialist powers not only promote the lie that the UN “created Israel”, they seek to dominate and control the balance of power across the Middle East! They pretend to this very day that ‘they’ determine the national borders of the Jewish state and where Jews in Israel can determine the Capital City of our country. Only Israel among all UN member States excluded as a recognized member of their own region! This UN Apartheid racism – stinks.

        Hamas’s charter historically rejects Israel’s existence, viewing it as illegal occupation. No different from the PLO charter which declares only ’48 Israel and not the UN condemned illegal Jordanian nationalization of the “West Bank”. The post 1922 Mandate awarded as “spoils of war” to the British witnessed the almost immediate separation of Trans-Jordan from its “Palestine Mandate” at the Jordan river.

        Furthermore, Arafat’s initiation of the 2nd Intifada following the Oslo Accords established the 3 zones of Samaria, further supports Israel fundamental distrust of “Palestinian war propaganda”. Israelis like myself tend to the view that Arabs learn to lie and steal straight from their mothers’ milk; comparable to the ‘Quartet’ language of peace as merely an empty noun/rhetoric rather than shalom as a verb which stands upon the foundation of trust. Repeated attempts by foreign states outside the Region, to dictate and/or dominate the narrative, the continuous stream of UN anti-Israel condemnations, forces Jerusalem to view declarations made by foreign states which share no border with the Jewish state as extremely suspect.

        All Arab/Israeli Wars fought not over “borders” but rather Arab absolute rejection of dhimmi Jews possession of equal rights to achieve self-determination in the Middle East. The 1917 Balfour Declaration and the 1922 League of Nations Mandate awarded to post WWI Britain, based upon the central premise to establish a Jewish National Home in Palestine.

        Zionist Jews immediately denounced this first 1922\23 White Paper, which pales in comparison to the British betrayal of Chamberlain’s Nazi Appeasement policies which later betrayed both the Czech Republic in 1938, and a year later imposed a blockade of Palestine to prevent Jews the avenue to escape from the Nazis. This 2nd White Paper had a tremendous impact upon Washington! Contrast the open door policy where pre WWI Washington invited Jewish refugees fleeing from the death spiral collapse of Czarist Autocracy of 3 Centuries duration (about equal to the ghetto gulags the Catholic Church imposed upon Western European Jewry) to FDR’s decision to close the borders of the US to prevent Jewish refugees to flee from the Nazis.

        The post-June 1967 War context, where France’s arms embargo and Britain’s neutrality shifted following the Arab defeat, highlights attempts by these two defeated former ‘Great Powers’ to re-impose their domination of the balance of power in the Middle East following their post 1956 failed attempt to seize control of Nasser’s Suez Canal!

        UN resolutions as a form of perceived “apartheid” illustrates a sentiment that resonates with many who feel marginalized in discussions about their national identity. The insistence that foreign powers dictate borders and political statuses — provoke significant anger and resentment, particularly in the context of a nation that has fought for its existence through multiple Wars consequent to British imperialism which promoted from day ONE of their British “Palestine Mandate” a divide & conquer “gospel” which likewise exploded in multiple wars fought between the India Pakistan British Two-State Solution/imperialism.

        All Arab/Israeli Wars fought over Arab rejection of the Balfour Declaration/League – Palestine Mandate. Arab countries view “dhimmi Jews” on par with failed Crusader States of the Middle Ages! Britain nor France ever a “neutral power” in Middle East and North African Sahel-MENA, despite the collapse of both empires across the world. Their colonial ambitions shaped many of the political and social structures that persist today. The ongoing interventions and pressures from these nations often manifest in support for certain regimes or factions, solidifying their roles as active players rather than neutral observers. This involvement has contributed to entrenched conflicts, making it challenging for the region to achieve self-determination. Hence Britain and the later EU share an open alliance against the continued existence of the Jewish State.

        During the Oct7th 2023 Abomination War, both countries sided with the South African blood libel slander which falsely accuses Israel of genocide. Contrast the British guilt during the invasion of Iraq that killed some 650,000 Iraqis and resulted in millions of wounded which threw Iraq and later Libya into utter chaos and anarchy.

        French imperialism stand out through the criminal war crimes in both Algeria and Vietnam! Accusations made against Israel accusing it of genocide/Nazism exposed the repeated racial anti-Jew Christ Killer themes which culminated in the European Shoah slaughter of 75% of Western European Jewry in less than three years of Europe’s 2nd General Civil War of the 20th Century.

        The leadership of President Trump’s Abraham Accords achieved in his first Administration and his Gaza Peace Board reject British and French imperialism which initiated their Two State Solution UN 242, 338, etc “dictates”; wherein the UN Frames the Two State Solution as the only viable way to achieve peace in the Middle East political rhetoric propaganda. Post the Oct7th Hamas defeat the UN, Britain, France, Russia, “Quartet” excluded from the Board of Peace. While Saudi Arabia sits together with Israel on this board of Peace! This accomplishment represents a radical and total rejection of the post ’67 attempts by these hostile imperialist 2nd rate powers to dictate terms imposed upon the Jewish state which seek to return Jewish international border to the post ’48 cease fire lines.

        Debates among historians who often frame the Middle East conflict viewed through the lenses of statehood and territorial sovereignty while ignoring that States have interests rather than friendships, invalidates post war “historical” comments made by foreign peoples not directly touched by the wars fought. Something akin to an American citizen condemning Putin’s war to prevent the Ukraine joining the NATO alliance completely oblivious due to a shallow reactionary understanding that Russia permanently shaped by two European invasions of Russia through the flat plains of the Ukraine. Reactionary ignorance on this scale resembles the Cuban missile crisis during the Kennedy Administration.

        The UN and ICC open condemnation of Israel for genocide exposes foreign state hostile diplomacy of “genocide” compared to the Nazi Shoah. As the trivialization of the Shoah, 80 years after these war crimes against humanity. No different from how Turkish diplomacy minimizes the Armenian Genocide.

        The Arab propaganda which emphasizes the false pie in the sky claim of “focus on ending occupation and achieving statehood” hides and conceals the cold hard FACT – post the 1948 Independence War the League of Nations AND UN Protectorate of Palestine ceased to exist. Furthermore, this Arab lie conceals that the Ottoman empire referred to this region of its empire as: “Greater Syria”; the Sick Man of Europe being bankrupt relied upon European cartographers to make maps of 19th Century Ottoman ‘Greater Syria’. During the entire British mandate, all Arabs unilaterally rejected the Balfour foundation of the League Palestine mandate. In point of FACT, Arabs cannot even pronounce the letter P of this foreign European word!

        Arab “Filastin” embraces the defunct Roman imperialism which changed Judea unto the European word “Palestine”. The renaming of Judea to Palestine by both Greek and Roman European empires exactly matches the interests of Arab propaganda today. Had Ben Gurion named the new Jewish State Palestine, the Palestine Post would not be the Jerusalem Post today!

        The UN partition plan – 181 rejected consequent to all Arab state refusal. Modern revisionist history by Quartet hostile powers and Arab states “acceptance” of 181 – utter pie in the sky non sense. Israeli Independence permanently terminated the influence of 181. 1948 simply not 2026 not for Arab Israeli disputes nor any other country in the annuls of history. Arab and Quartet attempts to “internationalize” the Arab/Israeli dispute only expose their State interests of imperialism.

      189. If all you watch is extreme right-wing propaganda then it’s not surprising that you develop weird views!!

      193. It’s so good to open an erudite dialogue with someone at the front line in yet another Middle Eastern conflict between vying dictators and religious fanatics. Good to receive such interesting insight.

      198. Mesechta Avoda Zarah specifically instructs that only Israel accepts the Torah. Hence the דיוק – the god of Sinai only a local tribal god. Clearly the god who delivered Israel out of Egypt not the God of Egypt. בראשית ברא אלהים introduces Av tohor wisdom commandments taught through the משל of the world created in six days. The נמשל introduces time-oriented Av Torah commandments which creates the chosen Cohen people in all generations through the sanctification of time-oriented commandments. Hence Torah commands mussar. Torah does not teach history. T’NaCH & Talmud, Siddur & Midrashim establish the culture, customs, practices and identities of the chosen Cohen people. Just that simple, no fancy dancing.

        The god of Israel judged the Egyptian Gods. The concept of as above so below. The god of Israel vs. the Gods of Egypt serve as the eternal model of a Court-room trial. The Goyim world view which reads their Bible or Koran as Egypt’s Gods either false or subordinate means nothing. Goyim never accepted the Blessing/Curse brit of Sinai. Just as Goyim aliens do not determine the k’vanna of the mitzva of Moshiach so too Goyim do not determine the god of Israel.

        The curse of g’lut: Jews do not do mitzvot לשמה – based upon the first Sinai commandment. Egypt לאו דוקא. The temple of Shlomo – av tuma avoda zara made by a fool. The Book of Kings makes satire by referring to Shlomo as the “wisest of all men”. The god of Israel binds only Israel because only Israel accepts the revelation of the Torah at Sinai.

        The Nicene Creed which equates Jesus as God, perhaps the strongest proof; international law a myth of propaganda morality, not a binding authority. Political conflicts throughout history falsely classified by some as a failure of diplomacy. But casting this political rhetoric upon the dust bin of history, political conflicts express a natural clash of sovereign “Gods.” Restated: A nation‑state — a functional “God.” Theological Universal Monotheism\tawhid, often called “international law” by UN member states who oppose Israel, attempt to override national sovereignty through religio/political rhetoric. But history provokes-proves that nations create their own sacred narratives. Universal monotheism directly resembles Great Power imperialism. The revelation of the Torah at Sinai establishes faith as judicial Sanhedrin court justice limited to the bnai brit people alone.

        Other nations never bound to the 7 mitvot other than Ger Toshav. Why? These mitzvot make a required הבדלה which separates ger toshav from na’creeim. The Talmud always remains within the judicial boundaries which the Written Torah determines. Post sealing of the Shas Bavli all opinions made by scholars compare to US Supreme Court rulings which later Courts can overturn.

        The Blessing/Curse Torah oath brit faith never presumes any conclusion that g’lut applies to HaShem as its applies to Israel. Any reading that attempts to teach this metaphor – it taken literally – merely a טיפש פשט. For example: among the Reshonim, only Rambam ruled halacha from aggadic sources. His Universal Monotheistic God permits Jews to daven in av tuma avoda zara Mosques.

        That later Goyim, such as Hobbs, Schmitt, or modern nationalism “influenced” by the Torah does not invert this Torah “Nation-State as Functional God” as post Talmudic. Based upon the Torah premise: the chicken created and later laid eggs. Church rejection of the פרדס Oral Torah combined with their Jesus God invalidates its literalist reading of the Creation story. Just as Muhammad’s equal redefinition of prophets as persons sent to all nations invalidates the revelation of the Torah first commandment. Allah simply a Golden Calf word substitution.

        Rambam’s universalist Noahide framework only a philosophical systematization, and it does not appear explicitly in the Talmud or Tanakh as a normative precedent. Hilchot Melachim 8–10, expresses a foreign philosophy — a Greek-influenced natural law perspective. The Talmud does not frame non-Jews as bound by a universal law in a systematic, Greek-like sense. Rambam abstracts from Talmudic rulings to a universal ethical schema — a philosophical move. There is no canonical Talmudic or Tanakh precedent for universalist moral obligations like Rambam imposes.

        T’NaCH prophetic sources such as found Isaiah 13-14, 40-48 directed toward the failure of Israel to do t’shuva and remember the Sinai oath brit. Never to Goyim who never accepted this Sinai oath brit obligation. Same applies to Yonah sent to Nineveh. Repentance made by Goyim shares nothing with the Torah mitzva of t’shuva. Because t’shuva centers upon remembering the oaths sworn by our fore-fathers; repentance refers to regret made over personal sins.
        _______________________________________________
        _______________________________________________

        Ukraine has captured more territory than Russia has taken in recent months, particularly during February 2026, highlighting a shift in momentum. However, these figures vary by source, with some analysts noting that winter conditions and troop morale play significant roles.

        U.S. government social media post regarding the death of activist Quentin Deranque during political clashes in Lyon, France has limited the access of U.S. Ambassador Charles Kushner to senior officials. His death has sparked significant outrage in France, leading to accusations and heightened tensions between political factions, particularly between far-left and far-right groups. The recent diplomatic spat involving Charles Kushner, the U.S. Ambassador to France, revolves around his failure to attend a summons from the French Foreign Ministry concerning the comments made by the U.S. in the wake of the tragic death of Quentin Deranque, a 23 year old far-right activist who suffered a suffered a fatal brain injury. In the aftermath, eleven suspects have been detained, with several under investigation for murder. Among those arrested were two parliamentary aides linked to La France Insoumise (LFI), a significant left-wing political party in France. Raphaël Arnault, a party member, faced significant backlash due to his connections to groups blamed for the violence. Despite being forewarned about the protest, local police failed to prevent or even timely respond to this political murder. This failure raises serious concerns about public safety and the police’s ability to manage politically charged situations.

        Spain’s political landscape with the US, terminated after Prime Minister, Pedro Sanchez refusal to support U.S. military actions in Iran, and denounced U.S. intervention in Venezuela. Spanish officials have voiced their “concerns” about the consequences of Sanchez’s defiance, including possible restrictions on Spanish shipping to the U.S. stemming from the refusal to allow weapon transport for Israel.

        Trump’s “America First” policy aligns with Washington’s ideals by advocating for reduced military engagements abroad and questioning the utility of longstanding alliances with European nations, particularly Britain, France and Spain. The Trump Administration during its first term highly critical of NATO countries funding structures, framing NATO allies’ lack of investment as a drain on U.S. resources.

        The Gaza Board of Peace excludes England France and the UN and Spain. But includes regional players like Israel, Saudi Arabia, and Egypt, aiming for a “balanced” approach without traditional Western intermediaries. Trump’s “America First” policy aligns with Washington’s ideals by advocating for reduced military engagements abroad and questioning the utility of longstanding alliances with European nations, particularly Britain, France and Spain. The Trump Administration during its first term highly critical of NATO countries funding structures, framing NATO allies’ lack of investment as a drain on U.S. resources.

        President Trump’s foreign policy echoes strategies reminiscent of those instituted by President Dwight D. Eisenhower following the Suez Crisis of 1956. This reflects a significant historical context regarding U.S. relations with European powers and the Middle East. The establishment of NATO in 1949 was a direct outcome of Truman’s support for European nations. No critic of Eisenhower ever once referred to his slap to both London and France as ‘Great Powers’ in Middle East diplomacy commonly referred to as ‘sharing the balance of power’ as US pre WWII Isolationism. Truman’s pivot, prioritized containing communism over long-term decolonization, fostering global disillusionment with U.S. foreign policy.

        The original British empire policy coined as “maintaining the balance of power” in a region of interest, emerged as the US rejection of European colonialism and imperialism throughout history. FDR publicly denounced Paris colonialism in Vietnam. Alas Truman rejected this FDR anti-colonial policy and employed US ships to return the French back to Vietnam. That failure of leadership resulted in the Korean and Vietnam wars – a horrible disaster for the American people.

        Truman’s abandonment of FDR’s anti-colonial stance exemplifies a critical failure of leadership, where short-term geopolitical interests overshadowed the long-term implications of supporting colonial powers. This pivot fostered continued conflict and disillusionment with U.S. foreign policy. President Trump seeks to make America Great Again, not based upon a Hoover isolation policy but rather a rejection of past Presidential incompetence and betrayal of the American manifest destiny vision first established by the Framers who established the American Republic and not the American Democracy as developed post Civil War. Dismantling the Federal bureaucracies and returning State economic autonomy back to the States as first laid down by the Commerce Clause of the US Constitution and Jefferson’s 10 Amendment, will this policy define Trump 2.0?

        Will Trump 2.0 restrict all bills presented in either Houses of Congress to maintain the priority status that Congress persons in Washington serve as “ambassadors” of State legislatures. Only State Legislatures can introduces bills to their Congressional representatives sitting in Congress. Outlawing Corporate lobbies which currently dominate the Federal legislative process. Restricting corporate lobbying to the States would greatly enhance the prestige of State legislative governments. Limiting corporate lobbies to the states, acknowledges Washington DC not a separate state within the Union Republic. Openly rejects the false notion that frames Corporations as people. The Bill of Rights extends only to citizens but not business corporations.

        As the Trump SC over-ruled Roe vs. Wade so too and how much more so may this Court negate the Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (2010) perversion. This Obamo-watch abomination stands upon several Post Civil War judgments which began with the notion that States do not have the Right to secede from the Union, and then elevated the privileges of Robber Baron monopolies. The 2010 Supreme Court ruling equates corporate political spending with free speech. However, based upon the simple principle: Guns do not kill, it takes a person to pull the trigger — business corporate interests do not qualify as people any more than guns kill.

      206. A diet of right-wing propaganda is what makes fascists grow. See enough of it and you begin to believe it!

      210. Nobody’s clean. All cultures have stains of hatred, war, genocide and violence. None so blind as the blind.

      215. Mesechta Avoda Zarah specifically instructs that only Israel accepts the Torah. Hence the דיוק – the god of Sinai only a local tribal god. Clearly the god who delivered Israel out of Egypt not the God of Egypt. בראשית ברא אלהים introduces Av tohor wisdom commandments taught through the משל of the world created in six days. The נמשל introduces time-oriented Av Torah commandments which creates the chosen Cohen people in all generations through the sanctification of time-oriented commandments. Hence Torah commands mussar. Torah does not teach history. T’NaCH & Talmud, Siddur & Midrashim establish the culture, customs, practices and identities of the chosen Cohen people. Just that simple, no fancy dancing.

        The god of Israel judged the Egyptian Gods. The concept of as above so below. The god of Israel vs. the Gods of Egypt serve as the eternal model of a Court-room trial. The Goyim world view which reads their Bible or Koran as Egypt’s Gods either false or subordinate means nothing. Goyim never accepted the Blessing/Curse brit of Sinai. Just as Goyim aliens do not determine the k’vanna of the mitzva of Moshiach so too Goyim do not determine the god of Israel.

        The curse of g’lut: Jews do not do mitzvot לשמה – based upon the first Sinai commandment. Egypt לאו דוקא. The temple of Shlomo – av tuma avoda zara made by a fool. The Book of Kings makes satire by referring to Shlomo as the “wisest of all men”. The god of Israel binds only Israel because only Israel accepts the revelation of the Torah at Sinai.

        The Nicene Creed which equates Jesus as God, perhaps the strongest proof; international law a myth of propaganda morality, not a binding authority. Political conflicts throughout history falsely classified by some as a failure of diplomacy. But casting this political rhetoric upon the dust bin of history, political conflicts express a natural clash of sovereign “Gods.” Restated: A nation‑state — a functional “God.” Theological Universal Monotheism\tawhid, often called “international law” by UN member states who oppose Israel, attempt to override national sovereignty through religio/political rhetoric. But history provokes-proves that nations create their own sacred narratives. Universal monotheism directly resembles Great Power imperialism. The revelation of the Torah at Sinai establishes faith as judicial Sanhedrin court justice limited to the bnai brit people alone.

        Other nations never bound to the 7 mitvot other than Ger Toshav. Why? These mitzvot make a required הבדלה which separates ger toshav from na’creeim. The Talmud always remains within the judicial boundaries which the Written Torah determines. Post sealing of the Shas Bavli all opinions made by scholars compare to US Supreme Court rulings which later Courts can overturn.

        The Blessing/Curse Torah oath brit faith never presumes any conclusion that g’lut applies to HaShem as its applies to Israel. Any reading that attempts to teach this metaphor – it taken literally – merely a טיפש פשט. For example: among the Reshonim, only Rambam ruled halacha from aggadic sources. His Universal Monotheistic God permits Jews to daven in av tuma avoda zara Mosques.

        That later Goyim, such as Hobbs, Schmitt, or modern nationalism “influenced” by the Torah does not invert this Torah “Nation-State as Functional God” as post Talmudic. Based upon the Torah premise: the chicken created and later laid eggs. Church rejection of the פרדס Oral Torah combined with their Jesus God invalidates its literalist reading of the Creation story. Just as Muhammad’s equal redefinition of prophets as persons sent to all nations invalidates the revelation of the Torah first commandment. Allah simply a Golden Calf word substitution.

        Rambam’s universalist Noahide framework only a philosophical systematization, and it does not appear explicitly in the Talmud or Tanakh as a normative precedent. Hilchot Melachim 8–10, expresses a foreign philosophy — a Greek-influenced natural law perspective. The Talmud does not frame non-Jews as bound by a universal law in a systematic, Greek-like sense. Rambam abstracts from Talmudic rulings to a universal ethical schema — a philosophical move. There is no canonical Talmudic or Tanakh precedent for universalist moral obligations like Rambam imposes.

        T’NaCH prophetic sources such as found Isaiah 13-14, 40-48 directed toward the failure of Israel to do t’shuva and remember the Sinai oath brit. Never to Goyim who never accepted this Sinai oath brit obligation. Same applies to Yonah sent to Nineveh. Repentance made by Goyim shares nothing with the Torah mitzva of t’shuva. Because t’shuva centers upon remembering the oaths sworn by our fore-fathers; repentance refers to regret made over personal sins.
        _______________________________________________
        _______________________________________________

        Ukraine has captured more territory than Russia has taken in recent months, particularly during February 2026, highlighting a shift in momentum. However, these figures vary by source, with some analysts noting that winter conditions and troop morale play significant roles.

        U.S. government social media post regarding the death of activist Quentin Deranque during political clashes in Lyon, France has limited the access of U.S. Ambassador Charles Kushner to senior officials. His death has sparked significant outrage in France, leading to accusations and heightened tensions between political factions, particularly between far-left and far-right groups. The recent diplomatic spat involving Charles Kushner, the U.S. Ambassador to France, revolves around his failure to attend a summons from the French Foreign Ministry concerning the comments made by the U.S. in the wake of the tragic death of Quentin Deranque, a 23 year old far-right activist who suffered a suffered a fatal brain injury. In the aftermath, eleven suspects have been detained, with several under investigation for murder. Among those arrested were two parliamentary aides linked to La France Insoumise (LFI), a significant left-wing political party in France. Raphaël Arnault, a party member, faced significant backlash due to his connections to groups blamed for the violence. Despite being forewarned about the protest, local police failed to prevent or even timely respond to this political murder. This failure raises serious concerns about public safety and the police’s ability to manage politically charged situations.

        Spain’s political landscape with the US, terminated after Prime Minister, Pedro Sanchez refusal to support U.S. military actions in Iran, and denounced U.S. intervention in Venezuela. Spanish officials have voiced their “concerns” about the consequences of Sanchez’s defiance, including possible restrictions on Spanish shipping to the U.S. stemming from the refusal to allow weapon transport for Israel.

        Trump’s “America First” policy aligns with Washington’s ideals by advocating for reduced military engagements abroad and questioning the utility of longstanding alliances with European nations, particularly Britain, France and Spain. The Trump Administration during its first term highly critical of NATO countries funding structures, framing NATO allies’ lack of investment as a drain on U.S. resources.

        The Gaza Board of Peace excludes England France and the UN and Spain. But includes regional players like Israel, Saudi Arabia, and Egypt, aiming for a “balanced” approach without traditional Western intermediaries. Trump’s “America First” policy aligns with Washington’s ideals by advocating for reduced military engagements abroad and questioning the utility of longstanding alliances with European nations, particularly Britain, France and Spain. The Trump Administration during its first term highly critical of NATO countries funding structures, framing NATO allies’ lack of investment as a drain on U.S. resources.

        President Trump’s foreign policy echoes strategies reminiscent of those instituted by President Dwight D. Eisenhower following the Suez Crisis of 1956. This reflects a significant historical context regarding U.S. relations with European powers and the Middle East. The establishment of NATO in 1949 was a direct outcome of Truman’s support for European nations. No critic of Eisenhower ever once referred to his slap to both London and France as ‘Great Powers’ in Middle East diplomacy commonly referred to as ‘sharing the balance of power’ as US pre WWII Isolationism. Truman’s pivot, prioritized containing communism over long-term decolonization, fostering global disillusionment with U.S. foreign policy.

        The original British empire policy coined as “maintaining the balance of power” in a region of interest, emerged as the US rejection of European colonialism and imperialism throughout history. FDR publicly denounced Paris colonialism in Vietnam. Alas Truman rejected this FDR anti-colonial policy and employed US ships to return the French back to Vietnam. That failure of leadership resulted in the Korean and Vietnam wars – a horrible disaster for the American people.

        Truman’s abandonment of FDR’s anti-colonial stance exemplifies a critical failure of leadership, where short-term geopolitical interests overshadowed the long-term implications of supporting colonial powers. This pivot fostered continued conflict and disillusionment with U.S. foreign policy. President Trump seeks to make America Great Again, not based upon a Hoover isolation policy but rather a rejection of past Presidential incompetence and betrayal of the American manifest destiny vision first established by the Framers who established the American Republic and not the American Democracy as developed post Civil War. Dismantling the Federal bureaucracies and returning State economic autonomy back to the States as first laid down by the Commerce Clause of the US Constitution and Jefferson’s 10 Amendment, will this policy define Trump 2.0?

        Will Trump 2.0 restrict all bills presented in either Houses of Congress to maintain the priority status that Congress persons in Washington serve as “ambassadors” of State legislatures. Only State Legislatures can introduces bills to their Congressional representatives sitting in Congress. Outlawing Corporate lobbies which currently dominate the Federal legislative process. Restricting corporate lobbying to the States would greatly enhance the prestige of State legislative governments. Limiting corporate lobbies to the states, acknowledges Washington DC not a separate state within the Union Republic. Openly rejects the false notion that frames Corporations as people. The Bill of Rights extends only to citizens but not business corporations.

        As the Trump SC over-ruled Roe vs. Wade so too and how much more so may this Court negate the Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (2010) perversion. This Obamo-watch abomination stands upon several Post Civil War judgments which began with the notion that States do not have the Right to secede from the Union, and then elevated the privileges of Robber Baron monopolies. The 2010 Supreme Court ruling equates corporate political spending with free speech. However, based upon the simple principle: Guns do not kill, it takes a person to pull the trigger — business corporate interests do not qualify as people any more than guns kill.

      237. The Xtian ‘Word of God’ has no portion with Sinai

        The בראשית Divine Names אל שדי אלהים אל וכו stand apart from the revelation of the שם השם לשמה revealed in the first Sinai commandment. Hence the Avot did not “know HaShem”. The Mishkan פרט teaches a profound משל which requires the generations to make the דיוק נמשל. The kabbalah-שכנה refers to rabbi Yechuda’s Yatzir Ha-Tov in his kre’a shma interpretation לבבך\כם; consistent with the dedication of Horev spirits/middot 13 followed up by Talmud Yerushalmi/Bavli middot 7 Hillel, 10 Akiva, 13 Yishmael affixed to interpreting Gemara common law halachic precedents and HaGallil 32 middot/aggada – to re-interpret (משנה תורה) the language of the Mishna which Gemara common law serves to interpret as a mirror of courtroom witnesses who testify based upon their given “fixed” perspectives. Akin to the front-top-side views of a blue print.

        The theological abomination of Monotheism perverts the reality that each nation unique, because each nation worships its own national God. The 30 Year War a strong precedent. A T’NaCH source precedent, the permanent split between the kingdoms of Yechuda and Yisroel serve witness before the אלהים court. First the kingdom of Israel assimilated and embraced alien cultures and customs and abandoned the Oral Torah which serves to define the culture, customs, social practices which define the identity of the chosen Cohen people. Then Yechuda also worshiped other National Gods by embracing foreign cultures customs and forgetting and abandoning the revelation of the god of Sinai. Hanukkah serves witness. The Rambam serves as a prime example of how assimilation and intermarriage define the k’vanna of the 2nd Sinai commandment. Herein explains the failure of Reshonim scholarship to inspire Israel to conquer our homelands, based upon the model of Moshe Rabbeinu.

        Mesechta Avoda Zarah specifically instructs that only Israel accepts the Torah. Hence the דיוק – the god of Sinai only a local tribal god. Clearly the god who delivered Israel out of Egypt not confused with the Gods of Egypt. בראשית ברא אלהים introduces Av tohor wisdom commandments taught through the משל of the world created in six days. The נמשל introduces time-oriented Av Torah commandments which require k’vanna & creates the chosen Cohen people in all generations through the sanctification of time-oriented wisdom commandments. Hence Torah commands mussar, the definition of prophetic wisdom. Torah does not teach history. T’NaCH & Talmud, Siddur & Midrashim establish the culture, customs, practices and identities of the chosen Cohen people. Just that simple, no fancy dancing.

        The god of Israel judged the Egyptian Gods. The Av tuma witchcraft which declares: as above so below – rejects the Revelation of the Torah first Sinai commandment: השם לא בשמים היא; the god of Israel post Sinai vs. the Gods of Egypt serve as the eternal הבדלה that differentiates the revelation of רוח הקודש מידות which quicken and cause the Yatzir Ha-Tov to live & breath. Herein defines the k’vaana of Oral Torah common law Court-room justice as the substance of the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. The Goyim world contrast-view reads their Bible or Koran — Egypt’s Gods either false or subordinate inferior Gods, who do not actually exist at all. Hence their Av tuma avoda zara promotes the theology known as Monotheism. Goyim never accepted the Blessing/Curse brit of Sinai. Just as Goyim aliens do not determine the k’vanna of the mitzva of Moshiach so too Goyim theology does not determine the god of Israel.

        The curse of g’lut: Jews lose the skill required to do mitzvot לשמה – based upon the first Sinai commandment – Egypt לאו דוקא. The temple of Shlomo – av tuma avoda zara made by a fool. The Book of Kings makes a דיוק satire by referring to Shlomo as the “wisest of all men”. The god of Israel binds only Israel because only Israel accepts the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. Assimilated Rambam, another ‘latter day’ Mormon-like fool; he embraced the Arab tawhid and ruled that Jews could daven in Arab mosques, and his Guide philosophy based upon Aristotle rather than פרדס logic; that Allah the same god of Sinai – despite the cold hard fact that Goyim, specifically Muhammad, reject the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. Prophets never sent דוקא to Goyim; both Moshe and Yona sent to lands not included in the oath sworn to the Avot as the inheritance of their Cohen seed to cause g’lut Israel to remember the brit and do t’shuva. The Pauline ‘original sin’ replacement theology perverted the introduction of the Torah curse/theme of g’lut\exile and substitutes – the belief system, messiah Jesus God saves from sin.

        The Nicene Creed which equates Jesus as God, perhaps the strongest proof; international law a myth of propaganda morality, not a binding authority. Political conflicts throughout history falsely classified by some as a failure of diplomacy. But casting this political rhetoric upon the dust bin of history together with the NT & Koran, political conflicts express a natural clash of sovereign “Gods.” Restated: A nation‑state — a functional “God.” Theological Universal Monotheism\tawhid, often called “international law” by UN member states who oppose Israel, attempt to override national sovereignty through Religio-political rhetoric. But history provokes-proves that nations create their own sacred narratives, “Word of God”. Universal monotheism directly resembles Great Power imperialism. The revelation of the Torah at Sinai establishes faith as judicial Sanhedrin court justice limited to the bnai brit people alone.

        Other nations never bound to the 7 mitvot other than Gere Toshav living within the borders of the Cohen brit republic. Why? These mitzvot make a required הבדלה which separates ger toshav from na’creeim. The Talmud always remains within the judicial boundaries which the Written Torah written Constitution determines. Post sealing of the Shas Bavli all opinions made by scholars compare to US Supreme Court rulings which later Courts can overturn.

        The Blessing/Curse Torah oath brit faith never presumes any conclusion that g’lut applies to HaShem as its applies to Israel, based upon the contrast between the בראשית Divine Names from the first Sinai Name. Any reading that attempts to teach this metaphor – if taken literally – merely a טיפש פשט. The sophomoric Bible mistranslations and Koran serve as witness. For example: among the Reshonim, only Rambam ruled halacha from aggadic sources. His Universal Monotheistic God permits Jews to daven in av tuma avoda zara Mosques.

        That later Goyim, such as Hobbs, Schmitt, or modern nationalism “influenced” by the Torah, (the Founding Fathers of the American Republic serve as witness), does not invert this Torah “Nation-State as Functional God” as post Talmudic; based upon the Torah premise: the chicken created and later laid eggs. Church rejection of the פרדס Oral Torah combined with their Jesus God NT theology – invalidates its literalist reading of the Creation story. Just as Muhammad’s equal redefinition of prophets as persons sent to all nations invalidates the revelation of the Torah first commandment. Allah simply a Golden Calf word substitution.

        Rambam’s universalist Noahide framework only a philosophical systematization; it does not appear explicitly in the Talmud or Tanakh as a normative precedent. Hilchot Melachim 8–10, expresses a foreign philosophy — a Greek-influenced natural law perspective. The Talmud does not frame Goyim as bound by any such universal natural law – in a systematic, Greek-like sense. Rambam abstracts from Talmudic rulings unto a universal ethical schema — a philosophical move, that created a new Judaism religion. There is no canonical Talmudic or Tanakh precedent for universalist moral obligations like Rambam “God” imposes through his Roman-like statute law religious codification. Oral Torah logic employed by Sanhedrin justices to interpret law based upon precedents. The lights of the P’rushim hanukkah serve as witness that assimilation to Greek culture and deductive reasoning causes Israel to forget the Torah.

        T’NaCH prophetic sources such as found Isaiah 13-14, 40-48 directed toward the failure of Israel to do t’shuva and remember the Sinai oath brit. Never to Goyim – who to this very moment in time do not accept this Sinai oath brit blessing\curse-Life/Death judicial justice-g’lut oppression faith obligation. Yonah sent to Nineveh, serves witness. Repentance made by Goyim shares nothing with the Torah mitzva of t’shuva. Because t’shuva centers upon remembering the oaths sworn by our fore-fathers; repentance refers to regret made over personal sins – based upon the Pauline theology-doctrine: Original Sin. The “repentance” made by the king of Assyria – only an Indian Summer. Goyim not delivered from Egyptian slavery, therefore Goyim incapable of remembering the oaths sworn by the Avot to cut the time-oriented Torah brit which creates the chosen Cohen people throughout the generations.

        The בראשית “Creation story” introduces Av time oriented wisdom commandments. בראשית does not introduce something other than the revelation of the Torah at Sinai judicial common law. Based upon the כלל that a opening “Thesis Statement” followed by “particulars which validate” the thesis statement through specific particulars כלל-פרט.

        The Bavli aggada -does – mention Noahide categories, but not as a system, any more than the Creation story instructs that the Universe created in some silly טיפש פשט literalist reactionary reading. D’varim defines two types of Goyim in the brit oath-land inheritance of the chosen Cohen people. Mesechta Sanhedrin aggada address ger toshav and mesechta Baba Kama halacha – Nacreeim. Talmud does not ever refer to Goyim in foreign lands as having to obey the 7 mitzvot bnai noach. Why? Because Goyim never accept to this day the revelation of the Torah – inclusive of the Book בראשית.

        Mesechta Avoda Zara and Chullin teach that a Hebrew Goy slave – a ger toshav. Another proof: Orpha decided to return to her Moavite family. The דיוק clear, she returned to Moav and abandoned keeping the 7 mitzvot bnai noach. Ruth by contrast, returned to Israel and serves as the model of the mitzva ger tzeddik.

        [If] every nation establishes its own god, such as did Casear, and Mao; and HaShem breaths tohor middot – only the Oral Torah god of Israel – when we rule our homeland with righteous judicial common law courtroom justice — [then] What status of divine justice operates outside this Sinai brit? Each people by making their own Gods, as either Heads of State or theological belief systems etc. The Code of Hammurabi – approximately 600 to 800 years older than the commonly accepted date for the Sinai revelation after the liberation of the Israelites from Egypt, serves as witness. History testifies that throughout human history national leaders have assumed the role of God of their people/kingdom. Sinai does not sit atop of any universal pyramid. Rather the revelation of the Torah at Sinai — a different “mountain” entirely.

      241. Idiot you blank ignorance pathetic. Pigs make money they produce a lot more piglets than either cows sheep or goats. They, unlike yourself – exceptionally intelligent. Ranchers rotate crops and rotate cattle, chickens and pigs to manage their property! Ignorant moron.

      257. Oaf fat tub of lard.

        Approaching the climax of the US-Israel war against Shiite fanatics ruling Iran.

        Venezuelan compares to Kharg Island. Just as the Cuban house of cards collapsed with the US capture of the Venezuelan oil fields so too China’s house of cards will collapse after US marines capture and occupy Kharg Island. Kharg Island, Iran’s primary oil export terminal, critical for the country’s economy. It handles a significant portion of Iran’s oil exports, making it central to both domestic revenue and international trade partnerships. Approximately 90% of the oil refined and sold by Iran is exported to China through Kharg Island.

        This relationship underscores China’s role as a major player in the Iranian oil market, providing Iran with a vital economic lifeline amid sanctions and trade restrictions imposed by the West. Just as Communist Castro Cuba will most likely become a US protectorate territory like Puerto Rico. In similar fashion should US Marines capture Kharg Island, this will terminate the US/Israeli War against Iran.

        Iranians themselves must choose their own government. But loss of Kharg Island will cripple the Iranian economy like as Cubans experienced when Us Troops captured the President Maduro of Venezuela in one day. The collapse of Venezuela’s anti-US government directly impacted the economy of Cuba. Just as the collapse of the Shiite fanatic government of Iran will directly impact the economy of China.

      258. Really? Didn’t realise there was a plan. No regime change. Holding the world to ransome over those straits. At a complete loss. What happens when you put a conman in charge of sycophantic idiots like Hegseth and Noem.

      261. A foreign‑policy civil war inside the American right

        Neo-Con opposition to Trump 2.0 Campaigned “to stop all wars”. Meaning eternal wars – Korea, Vietnam, Afghanistan wars – his primary concern. To sum up Trump 2.0 טוב מיעט ממיעט טוב – Better a little good, than allot not good. Better a reliable Israeli ally than a lot of EU back stabbers. Trump 2.0 remembers the Yom Kippur oil embargo and the recent BRICS replacement policy. His destruction of both Venezuela and Iranian oil threats defines his vision of America First.

        Neo Con vs. Trump 2.0: Two very different foreign‑policy traditions now coexist — and clash — inside the American right. Neo‑conservatism emerged in the late 20th century and became especially influential after 9/11. Bush campaigned against the US maintaining a “Nation Building” Foreign Policy. VP ‘Dick’ Chaney defines the Neo Con agenda. The Democrat Clinton/Obama Administrations both promoted the Bush 1.0 ”New World Order” international alliance as the Top US strategic foreign policy.

        Neo-Con notions of spreading “the Good News” & “converting” foreign nations to embrace “democracy and democratic values” negates the classic foreign policy of trading with foreign nations as the central theme of Strategic US Foreign policy. Prior to the post WWII Pax American Empire, virtually all US Administrations focused upon building Universities rather than selling military equipment to foreign nations. Candace Owens expressed support for the post-9/11 invasion of Iraq, a necessary action in response to terrorism. Hashtag rapid rate opinionism. The USS Liberty no black Americans killed; yet hashtag Owens jabbers about the USS Liberty as if an event 22 years before her birth qualifies as a MAJOR black American issue today.

      263. PM Begin returned Sinai & PM Sharon returned Gaza because neither this nor that lands – Sinai nor Gaza – not included within the borders of either the First or Second Republic. Tucker Carlson Neo Con ideology rejects the leadership of Team Trump.

        The Labor leader in this pic,(see home page) has no more reliable ability to capture the Premiership than the Neo Cons convince President Trump that he should embrace their eternal war, US policeman of the Planet – Neo Con tenets of faith! The clip below, therefore represents a blood libel. PM Begin returned Sinai & PM Sharon returned Gaza because neither this nor that – Sinai nor Gaza – included within the borders of either the First or Second Republic. Both Bush 1 & 2, Clinton, Obama, Hillary, Pelosi etc defined their vision of the New World Order as – promoting multilateralism, international alliances, and global cooperation. Not so Team Trump’s America First.

        All nations throughout history, shape and determine their international borders – based upon Wars either won or lost. The 1846 Mexican American war definitively proves this fact. The Youtube propaganda “Israel’s borders not set in stone”, confuses the stone Sinai tablets with the international borders of the Jewish state! Post ’67 UN 242 England and France attempted to determine the international boundaries, and location of Israel’s Capital. Post ’73 Yom Kippur War both England and France criticized UN 338’s “failure” to directly mention a Palestinian state. UN 2334, Obama followed this “Leash -line”, hostile European imperialism!

        Israel as a nation, our wars determine our borders. No different than that of North Ireland “illegally occupied” (a propaganda language) by Britain. Its not the place of the UN or any country who does not share a common border with Israel, to presume that they predetermine Israeli strategic diplomacy. Israel shares nothing in common with Calvinist predetermination dogmatism. Pie in the Sky “International Law” does not determine legality or illegality of wars won or lost. War, defined by risk and consequences.

      264. Violence is NEVER an answer. It’s primitive savagery. We should be civilised! And 2 wrongs don’t make a right! That’s like saying Hitler murdered six million so it’s OK for us to murder a million or two. Absurd!

      266. Not a proper sentence – but incidentally I do have a good understanding of British and ME history – better than yours.

      281. Why Israelis abhor Goyim religions as the definition of the 2nd Sinai commandment.

        How legal common law jurisprudence Sanhedrin texts differ from alien religious texts. The latter viewed across European and Arab beliefs in their respective Gods, and interpreted by warring Xtian communities, like for example the 30 Years War and Sunni vs Shiite communities, like the Iraq Iran war, and how religious belief systems shape societal dynamics among Goyim. Sanhedrin common law views fervent belief as a Av tuma avoda zara midda, comparable to a judge accepting a bribe.

        The Gospels (both accepted and rejected) and gnostic stories, completely and totally alien to the Torah vision of “commandments”. The commandment of Moshiach, according to the Torah a ‘wisdom commandment’, commonly referred to as a positive time-oriented mitzva in Talmudic literature. Classic other examples of this Torah Av commandment: Shabbat, tefillah, and kiddushin: all time-oriented commandments require “k’vanna”. Furthermore, both gospel and gnostic non Jewish counterfeits – they all utterly separates the Torah commandment of Moshiach – a wisdom mitzva. Torah wisdom no one generations holds a lock and key monopoly upon. This fundamental distinction separates Torah common law from Goyim belief systems whose theologies and creeds create their own set of Gods.

        ALL Torah commandments obligate ALL bnai brit, in ALL generations, because ALL wisdom time-oriented commandments function as the essence of the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. Hence the 4 questions on Pesach Night contrasts the righteous vs wicked child – where the latter rejects the idea that all generations of Israel stand and accept the Torah at Sinai, as the k’vanna of the kre’a shma tefillah known as acceptance of the Yoke of Heaven – which remembers the specific oaths sworn by the Avot to father the chosen Cohen people.

        The bankrupt gospel fraud revisionist history fiction-story projects: a time long since past, when a Hercules son of God born to a ‘virgin girl’, (Which completely ignores the Torah negative commandments against of adultery and bastard children – permanently excluded from the Cohen chosen people.), and has no actual reality in all Human history. The gospel story more similar to the horror series first introduced by H.G. Wells – The Invisible Man.

        Jews do not wait for the Moshiach, Torah defines faith as the righteous pursuit of judicial justice – fair compensation of damages inflicted. The messiah has come idea, imposed and accepted by g’lut Jews, by Xtians in their outrage that Jews have always and forever said: the gospel narrative utter and complete Roman propaganda. The gospels originally written in Goyim Greek – not Hebrew or Aramaic. Goyim unto today, do not read the T’NaCH in its original Hebrew and Aramaic/Book of Daniel\. The Goyim bible confuses the mysticism of the Book of Daniel with prophesy. The Hebrew T’NaCH (divided into 3 sections: Torah, Prophets, and Holy Writings), the Book of Daniel placed in the Holy Writings together with Tehillem/Psalms!

        Goyim belief system religions never inquired how the gospel or koran narratives of prophesy, aligns with the Torah “tumah” idea of witchcraft. The latter predicts the future and necromancy. Whereas the Torah defines prophesy as a person (Man or Woman – such as D’vorah) who commands mussar. The mussar of D’vora to Barak, that a woman would receive the credit for killing the villain Sisera!

        The bible counterfeit declares Daniel a prophet, by which the NT framers much much later fervently proclaim: the book of Revelation – a prophetic book. The Talmud, Mesechta M’gillah – openly states Daniel not a prophet. And the Zohar like Daniel, written in Aramaic, supports the Talmud; because it contrasts the NaCH prophets against Daniel’s mysticism. Xtianity nor Islam recognize the Torah centrality of mussar. This basic fact proves that Goyim religions worship other Gods. And ignore the simple fact that only Israel stood and accepted the Torah at Sinai.

        For 2000+ years the false prophet bible counterfeit, which prioritizes its New Testament as having fulfilled its ‘Old Testament’, followed up by the even later koran – which recognizes JeZeus as a Torah prophet along with Muhammad. Xtianity waits for the 2nd Coming of JeZues, as does certain sects of Shiites wait for their savior. This mysticism viewed as a ‘believable’ Xtian prophesy based upon the mystic book of Revelations! It stands on par with the koran fraud which declares that prophets sent to all Peoples and those prophets speak the tongues of the peoples sent thereto. This latter koran declaration fundamentally rejects the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. Both bible and koran never bring the revelation of the Shekinah of Hashem who dwells within the Yatzir Ha-Tov of the chosen Cohen brit seed of Avraham Yitzak and Yaacov; which the Day of Atonement confirms by the t’shuva made by HaShem that only the Avot and not Moshe would father the chosen Cohen seed.

        Bottom line: Acceptance of the Torah at Sinai – Based upon both the T’NaCH\Talmudic sealed masoret – Israel accepts the Torah to function as the legal Constitution of the Bnai Brit Republic of 12 Tribes. This Torah written Constitution mandates the Federal and Tribal courts though the Great Sanhedrin Court (which Torah metaphor describes as Mishkan) and the Small Sanhedrin capital crimes courts located in the peripheral ‘Cities of Refuge’. This distinctions implies a further fundamental between Capital Crimes Sanhedrin courts vs 3-Man Torts courts. The latter courts perhaps possible to establish them outside the borders of the oath sworn Cohen land inheritance.

        Torts courts abroad superficially supports the Rambam posok halacha that ‘bnai noach’ not limited to gere toshav. Alas this assimilated nacree/Shomron, particularly as defined in Mesechtot Baba Kama, Avoda Zara and the additional blessing to the Shemone Esrei, this cursed like Spinoza-Karaim-like Kapo, succeeded to blow out the lights of Hannukah for generations. Consequent to his ירידות הדורות/domino effect\ which perverted T’NaCH\Talmudic judicial common law unto Roman statute law; no different than the modern day g’lut Orthodox, who declare – with a straight face – in all seriousness – that Israelis also remain in g’lut. Those fanatic religious fools, no different from the arrogant Cursed Abraham Geiger who declared Berlin as Reforms’ ‘New Jerusalem’……

      283. This is a worse mess than Iraq. No end in sight. No solution. More refugees, blood, violence and civil war. But you most probably enjoy that.

      285. No exit plan, no clear alternative to regime and no sign of a take-over. Looks like another Iraq which spawned ISIS.

      289. International law is civilised countries dealing with the uncivilised savages. People like Putin and Netanyahu.

      290. Noise. Prove your noise with facts rather than opinion. Dumb ass. Putin right. Pelosi-Biden sought to invalidate the post WWII treaties to prevent still another barbaric Western European invasion of Russia. Shit for brains.

      292. Why Yirmiyahu 1 Cannot “Compare” to Tehillim; Eikhah and Yirmiyahu: A National Axis. T’NaCH : Talmud :: Yerushalmi : Bavli. Judicial Justice vs. Creedal Religion. Prophesy vs. “foretelling”. The metaphor of calling Eikhah “Gemara” to Yarmia “Mishna” – not historiography. T’NaCH commands mussar not history. T’NaCH Av, Talmud toladah – like בראשית introduces Av wisdom commandments\time oriented mitzvot which require k’vanna while שמות, ויקרא, ובמדבר supplies Case/Rule toladot בניני אבות\precedents which require חכמה that raises halachic toladot ritualism unto Av time-oriented wisdom commandments.

        Yermia 1:1–10, a mussar commissioning narrative, while the others incline toward poetic reflections (Tehillim, Iyov) or wisdom exhortation (Mishle). Different genres = different aims. Tehillim 40:1–3, Mishle 1:20–23, and Iyov 14:1–4, which explains why they don’t “compare” in any meaningful literary or theological way. Yermia 1:1–10, a mussar-prophetic prose, not poetry. Tehillim 40:1–3, a personal expression of gratitude for deliverance from suffering. It communicates this “vision” through a poetic, emotional, and liturgical language. Mishle 1:20–23, speaks as a rebuking teacher calling the simple to “remember” as the basis of t’shuva. It qualifies as instructional wisdom literature, not narrative. Iyov 14:1–4, laments the brevity and impurity of human life; existential poetry, not instruction or thanksgiving.

        Tehillem 130 despite its plea for help and yearns for tohor middot revealed in this world and therefore superficially reflects the Yermia 1:1-10 theme of longing for tohor middot within the Yatzir Ha’Tov to guide and direct how a man interacts with his oath alliance Cohen people in the faith: pursuit of judicial justice – which witnesses a common law court imposed fair restitution of damages to victims. 130 differs from the mussar of the opening verse of Yermia, whose mussar applies straight across the board to all generations of the chosen people while Tehillem, specifically in this particular case, reflects a personal supplication and trust for guidance rather than defined Oral Torah tohor middot (אל רחום חנון וכו) which defines prophetic mussar in all the Books of the NaCH prophets.

        Mishle 2:15 invites the generations to seek wisdom. Torah wisdom defined as מלאכה. The refinement of tohor middot within the Yatzir Ha-Tov Mishkan-heart separates לא בשמים היא from the Book of בראשית which perceived אל שדי, או אלהים, או אל in the Heavens rather than post Sinai where all prophetic mussar rebukes Israel over and again not to search for our local Sinai tribal god anywhere outside of our Yatzir Ha-Tov hearts.

        Eikhah has a traditional association with Yermia – both Books express sorrow and mourning for Jerusalem’s destruction. Shir HaShirim communicates a heart felt relationship with the revelation of the שם השם לשמה through the Horev revelation of 13 tohor middot.

        Yermia 1:1–10 = Prophetic Mussar for the Entire Nation not a personal prayer which separates and catagorizes all Tehillem as שבח rather than ברכות. A Torah blessing requires שם ומלכות the essential conditions required to swear any & all Torah oath alliances known as “brit/britot”. This an absolutely critical מאי נפקא מינא definition of the 7th tohor Oral Torah midda רב חסד. The revelation at Horev of the 13 tohor middot define the required k’vanna of any and all wisdom commandments from the Torah known collectively as “time-oriented commandments”.

        Therefore which Holy Writing Primary “Gemara” source surpasses in tohor middot depth comparison to Yermia 1:10/”Mishna”? Eikhah. Due to it expresses national, not personal, the brit faith of blessing/curse justice – the central theme of acceptance of the Torah at Sinai as defined by the first Sinai commandment. HaShem libertated Israel from Egyptian slavery for Israel to obey the oath brit to rule Canaan with judicial common law Sanhedrin courtroom justice. Eikha communicates the curse of g’lut prophetic mussar; it functions as the case law to Yermia’s legal themes.

        Eikha addresses the consequences of worshipping Av tuma avoda Gods Universal Monotheism or otherwise who live in the Heavens above and therein denies and rejects the revelation of the Torah at Sinai; the revelation of the post Calf 13 middot defines the Torah concept of רוח הקודש. No other Ketuvim textual sources surpass how Eikhah serves as the Case/Rule best בנין אב precedent for Yermia 1:1-10.

        Jewish tradition, as reflected in Bava Batra 15a and various Targumim, links Eikhah to Jeremiah, sometimes viewing the five poems as his emotional outpouring following the consequences of the Moshe oath brit alliance cut in the Book of D’varim. Prophets do NOT foretell the future as defines the tuma nature of witchcraft from the Torah and also expressed through the av tuma gospels declarations “fulfilled the words of the prophets”.

        Psalm 130, while yearning for redemption and tohor qualities, remains a personal plea (“Out of the depths I call to You”), differing from the transgenerational prophetic mussar in Yarmia. Certain approaches emphasize the 13 tohor middot (revealed at Horev post-Golden Calf) as defining prophetic mussar and Oral Torah logic, distinguishing heart-centered covenantal wisdom (“לא בשמים היא”) from external searches. Within such lenses, Eikhah functions as a national “case” illustrating blessing/curse dynamics tied to Sinai acceptance, serving as precedent for Yarmia 1:1-10’s themes.

        This view draws on traditional associations while advancing a specialized framework centered on the 13 tohor middot as the logic system of Oral Torah revelation, the Yatzir Ha-Tov as the internal Mishkan-heart locus of wisdom (מלאכה), and time-oriented commandments requiring k’vanna defined by these middot (e.g., the single simplified example of רב חסד linked to oath alliances with שם ומלכות).

        Eikhah portrays the events as the national outworking of ignored prophetic warnings, functioning as emotional “case” material to Yarmia’s legal-prophetic mussar themes of judicial common law, fair restitution, Sanhedrin courtroom rule in Canaan as the purpose of liberation from Egyptian slavery. T’shuva spins around the central axis of remembering the oaths sworn by the Avot to eternally father the chosen Cohen people.

        The revelation of the Oral Torah 13 tohor middot spirits defines the k’vanna of the revelation of the first Commandment שם השם לשמה – the greatest Torah commandment upon which all other Torah commandments stand or fall. Eikhah, as national lament over g’lut consequences of rejecting Sinai’s first commandment (liberation for judicial brit justice), illustrates blessing/curse dynamics and serves as paradigmatic (a paradigm, one word can be replaced by another that fulfills the same grammatical role) precedent (בנין אב) for heart-centered oath brit alliances (Based upon the pre-conditions of שם ומלכות, where the latter term restricted to the dedication of Oral Torah middot as the guide and direction of the Yatzir Ha-Tov within the heart.) blessed to prevail over all av tuma avoda zara spirits – based upon the 10 plagues of Egypt.

        Its an error to say that Eikhah explicitly functions as the “best case law”/”Gemara source” for the Prophetic Primary source of Yarmia 1:1-10 simply because both the Mishna and Gemara followed after the sealing of the T’NaCH early in the days of the 2nd Commonwealth. Rather then to say that the T’NaCH serves as the “av model” for the later Mishna/Gemara\Talmud; akin to the Bavli came about 150 years after the sealing of the Yerushalmi. Anachronistic – out of its proper historical or chronological context – to compare T’NaCH literature with the much later Talmudic literature, except that both this and that exist as משנה תורה common law legalism. The former mussar common law while the latter halachic ritual common law; specifically the framers of the Talmud sealed the k’vanna for this common law scholarship to serve as the model in its own right to the day when Jews reconquered our homeland from the clutches of the Goyim.

        Its an error to say that Eikhah explicitly functions as the “best case law”/”Gemara source” for the Prophetic Primary source of Yarmia 1:1-10 simply because both the Mishna and Gemara followed after the sealing of the T’NaCH early in the days of the 2nd Commonwealth. Rather then to say that the T’NaCH serves as the “av model” for the later Mishna/Gemara\Talmud; akin to the Bavli came about 150 years after the sealing of the Yerushalmi. Anachronistic – out of its proper historical or chronological context – to compare T’NaCH literature with the much later Talmudic literature, except that both this and that exist as משנה תורה common law legalism. The former mussar common law while the latter halachic ritual common law; specifically the framers of the Talmud sealed the k’vanna for this common law scholarship to serve as the model in its own right to the day when Jews reconquered our homeland from the clutches of the Goyim.

        Eikhah exemplifies national brit dynamics: the lived curse of g’lut stemming from av tuma worship or rejection of Sinai’s commandments against witchcraft and Yosef’s divination fraud with his brothers! The T’NaCH – sealed through a gradual process spanning the Second Temple era, with traditional credit to the Men of the Great Assembly (early Second Commonwealth) for significant organization, though full consensus extended into the early rabbinic period after Daniel’s composition (~164 BCE). The Mishnah – redacted ~200 CE; the Yerushalmi Gemara reached completion in the late 4th to early 5th century CE; the Bavli followed roughly 100–180 years later (mid-6th to early 7th century CE), if the Sovaraim included as the final redactors.

        Tanach therefore stands as the primary “av model”—providing precedents via hermeneutics such as binyan av—for the Mishna/Gemara structure, exactly as the Yerushalmi models the expansive Bavli. This avoids anachronism while preserving Tanach’s primacy in defining mussar, justice, and middot refinement as the substance of Torah faith to pursue righteous justice among our people.

        The Talmud compares to that of a warp/weft loom which weaves aggadic דרוד\פשט threads of T’NaCH mussar with רמז/סוד threads of halachic ritualism. This latter “thread” conceals the judicial justice most essential nature of Talmudic hope and vision for the future with the kabbalah of halacha which dresses the Talmud as religious ritual Jewish law. Av tuma avoda zara by definition worships their Gods (Monotheism or otherwise) in the Heavens above and not as faith in righteous judicial courtroom common law justice below.

        Judicial justice, in point of fact, abhors religious belief systems, theologies and Creedal dictates from god-like saints and cult figures as something disgusting on par with how the brothers of Yosef groveled before him. Cults of personality practically the sole definition of avoda zara; Muhammad and his silly Koran serve as stark witness. The wisdom of weaving prophetic mussar based upon tohor prophetic middot as the k’vaana of doing halachic ritual observances changes these toldot-secondary commandments/mitzvot which do not require k’vaana to wisdom Torah commandments which dedicate – like a korban – Oral Torah tohor middot – the revelation of k’vanna of the 1st Sinai commandment sanctified לשמה. Simply stated: Judicial justice vs. Religious belief in God or Gods — compares to a person who enters a mikveh while holding a dead rat in his hand. This comparison taught in mesechta Yevamot expresses the deep revulsion and utter contempt for the Pauline graphted on to, Goyim don’t require brit melah, not under the law av tuma avoda zara; or the Muhammad the last prophet lie – the Torah forbids camel before pig.

        Earthly Sanhedrin courtroom justice—rooted in the first Sinai commandment—as the living “mikveh” of the nation, while heavenly-focused belief systems contaminate it like the dead rat. This shabbat like הבדלה emphasizes heart-centered tohor middot refinement over creedal religion, aligns with T’NaCH prophetic mussar. The משל of holding a dead sheretz (rat), all theology based Creedal Ego-I belief systems fundamentally define the k’vanna of the 2nd Sinai negative commandment. The רמז\סוד threads of Talmudic halacha conceal the substance of Torah courtroom justice from the forms of religious belief in Gods in heaven or earth – the latter expressed through physical Temple-idols.

        The revelation of the Torah through the רמז\סוד of the Mishkan – the sin of the Golden Calf functions as its logical דיוק/inference. The bark of a tree does not compare to the fruit it produces. Avoda zara confuses the bark for the fruit; the ערב רב did not worship a Golden Calf “bark” but rather they foolishly worshiped the word name substitute theology which replaced אלהים for the Sinai first commandment שם השם לשמה – which the Oral Torah further clarified as רוח הקודש מידדות. No word, regardless of its spoken language, can substitute or replace רוח הקודש middot Spirits – the substance of the revelation of the Torah at Sinai which all Goyim reject to this very day.

      295. Av tuma Goyim avoda zara – simply ewwwwwwwwwwww

        In the Torah and the rest of the Hebrew Bible, Sheol (שאול) – not “Hell,” nor “Heaven.”
        Sheol a poetic, neutral term for: the grave. The Greek notions of an underworld or the Egyptian mythology of “the realm of the dead” – the place where all humans go when they die, righteous or wicked – not a subject of Torah common law. Why? The revelation of the Torah at Sinai for the living and not the dead. The aggadah located in mesechta ברכות explicitly teaches this mussar through the story of a Man after having a fight with his wife going out and sleeping in a graveyard. The halacha likewise instructs this exact same mussar when ever a Jew enters a graveyard he first tucks his tzitzit inside his pants because mitzvot only apply to the living and not the dead.

        The Torah does not present a dualistic afterlife system. No eternal Heaven for the righteous. No eternal Hell for the wicked. Moshe cut an oath brit of either Blessing/Curse – rule the land with justice vs endure Egyptian slavery injustice. The latter called g’lut/exile.

        The Talmudic reference of “gehinnom” refers to the T’NaCH geographic valley south of Jerusalem wherein assimilated and intermarried Jews sacrificed their sons and daughters to other Gods, specifically Molech in Gê Ben‑Hinnom. The Baal worship completely apart and different from the worship of Molech.

        The aggadic portions which address this subject have no halachic applications – despite the Rambam who erroneously ruled otherwise in the matter of the 7 mitzvot gere toshav. Talmudic Aggada mussar “limits” the metaphor משל “gehinnom” to 12 months duration, for simple Jews who treat Torah as religion rather than common law. Talmudic mussar addresses the concept of purification.

        For example: The practice of placing a dead body in the Mikveh (a ritual bath) prior to burial for ritual purification. The abstract concept of tohor vs tuma middot stands on the foundation of Moshe warning Israel not to approach their wives three days before the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. Rabbi Meir taught 48 “degrees” of tuma. This subject based upon making a דיוק upon the 13 tohor spirits revealed to Moshe at Horev 40 days after the sin of the av tuma avoda zara Golden Calf wherein the ערב רב-assimilated and intermarried Israelites-translated the revelation of HaShem permanently living within the Yatzir Ha-Tov hearts of the chosen Cohen people – the definition of the revelation of the Torah at Sinai; instead the ערב רב worshipped word-name translations. Specifically they translated the word אלהים in the place of the 1st commandment שם השם לשמה. Therein they rejected the revelation of the Torah that tohor middot לשמה — as taught in mesechta Baba Metzia — לא בשמים היא.

        Immersing the body in the Mikveh showcases the community’s respect for the deceased. This act, ideally performed by the chevra kadisha, (a sacred burial society dedicated to the preparation of the body), adhering to specific halachic rituals and maintaining the dignity of the deceased. The practice of placing a deceased body in the Mikveh prior to burial emphasizes purification, respect, and adherence to Jewish law – as the last act, akin to saying kre’a shma before dying. Engaging in these halachic rituals – a show of respect for the living family survivors who mourn for their dead as an opening expression of their mourning.

      303. Understand the fundamental difference between the revelation of the Torah at Sinai vs. theological creed “I believe” Ego-I driven av tuma avoda zara.

        1. Xtians wait for the 2nd Coming. Therefore this God lives in heaven not Earth. Pantheism posits that God – synonymous with the universe and its processes, often lacking the personal, relational aspect. Such a God beyond Human grasp to understand. Similar to how Human civilizations incomprehensible to ants.

        2. Can’t have it both ways, either God of Sinai on this earth, or waiting for the 2nd Coming. For example: Xtian theology rhetoric preaches belief in a Universal God; where was JeZeus during the Shoah? The Nicene Creed hence established the “Holy Spirit” as part of the Triune God-Head to address the open NT contradiction where Xtians wait for the 2nd coming. Yet, not till Vatican II did any religious Xtian branch invalidate their long bloody history of “Christ Killer” racial slanders repeated over and again throughout the Ages prior to the Shoah. The Church, universally – Catholic & Protestant & Orthodox etc. – preached all the same hate theology: that Jews cursed with the curse of Cain; as despised refugees they must forever walk the Earth. The 3 Century ghetto gulag war crime stands as proof. Yet in 1948 and ’67 Jews re-conquered their homeland. Proving the church hate rhetoric which justified Paro oppression feudalism and slavery racism as nothing other than a house of cards lie. If Jews never cursed as Cain, but rather our Torah oath brit faith contains both blessing and curse obligations, then where do the Xtian slander lies stop?

        The Shema (Deut. 6:4) does not at all resemble to Muslim scholars like Al-Ghazali who critiqued pantheism (e.g., in Sufi excesses) for risking shirk (association), insisting on a personal God who is “closer than the jugular vein” (Quran 50:16) but not the universe itself. Why? The Shema serves as the Torah commandment known as tefillah. This wisdom commandment or time-oriented mitzva, a concept no where addressed in either the NT or Koran substitute revisionist history theologies, separates as does shabbat from chol the k’vanna to accept the 3 oaths sworn by the Avot to father the chosen Cohen people AND eternally accept the revelations of the Written Torah at Sinai/Oral Torah at Horev as ONE oath brit. Hence the tefillah mitzva requires either standing directly in front of a Sefer Torah or tefillen because both serve as an essential pre-condition to swear a Torah oath. Bottom line: Based upon the 2nd Sinai commandment, all theological creed constructs of “monotheism” violate this commandment; simply stated if only one tawhid God then no need or reason to justify the existence of the negative commandment not to worship other gods. Monotheism violates the 10 plagues of Egypt wherein HaShem judged the Gods of Egypt.

        Chrysostom’s “deicide” label simply not negated by Vatican II’s Nostra Aetate (1965). Nor can the latter negate the post WWII Catholic ‘Rat-lines’ which assisted Nazi war criminals to flee to South America and escape standing before the Bar of justice. Xtian responses post-Holocaust, like those from Jürgen Moltmann, emphasize a “suffering God” who weeps with victims, reinterpreting the Trinity (from Nicene Creed) as divine solidarity, not contradiction. However, critics note this came late—pre-Vatican II theology often portrayed Jews as cursed wanderers, justifying ghettos (e.g., from 1555 papal bull) and feudal oppression.

        Jewish tradition defines prophecy as mussar—reproof for justice, not fortune-telling (e.g., Amos 5:24). Muslims reject the Torah as corrupted totally invalidates the Akadah of Yitzak and the sworn oath addressing the threat of Shoah extermination. Three years after the Shoah arose the Jewish state. Jewish scholars like David Novak argue “Old Testament” implies supersessionism, a slander equating Jews with obsolescence. Fulfillment claims (e.g., Matthew’s use of Hosea 11:1) twist context—originally about Israel, not Jesus. Post-Holocaust, some like Rubenstein see all theodicies as “house of cards,” urging human responsibility.

        3. The NT notions of prophesy just as false and corrupt as their eternal blood libel slanders! Prophets to not predict the future as the gospel fraud declares. Why? Because witchcraft predicts the future. For example: king Shaul and the witch of Endor. Another example: the false prophet Muhammad declared in his koran that prophets sent to all nations and speak the native tongues of all peoples as the false prophet Muhammad declares. Torah NaCH prophets all command mussar – which neither false religion instructs! Moshe sent to Egypt, he spoke Hebrew and his mussar applies only to the Jewish people alone. A challenge of the ערב רב serves as a fundamental Torah curse which defines the 2nd Sinai commandment of avoda zarah; Jewish assimilation and intermarriage brings the plague of Amalek/antisemitism in all generations. A NaCH example: king Shlomo married foreign wives and duplicated how Goyim worship their Gods through constructs of wood and stone Temple Cathedrals. The satire of the Book of Kings, it refers to king Shlomo as “the wisest of all men”.

        4. No such thing as another ‘House of Cards’ lie: “Old Testament”. The false prophesy exposed in the fraud NT about “fulfillment” of “Old Testament” prophesies – a slander equal to “Christ Killers” or the Protocols of the Elders of Zion forgery! T’NaCH prophetic mussar applies straight across the board only to Jews in all generations unto today. Why only Jews? Simply because Goyim – not Esau nor Ishmael – ever accepted the revelation of the Torah at Sinai wherein the spirit of the First Commandment שם השם לשמה lives in this oath sworn land within the Yatzir Ha-Tov of the Chosen Cohen people; based upon the commandment of the 1st Sinai commandment. All lands and countries outside the eternal inheritance of the brit Cohen people – constitutes as Egyptian exile. Goyim, by definition excluded as part of the Chosen Cohen people, as mentioned above. Therefore Goyim worship other Universal theologies of new Gods – the 2nd Sinai commandment; the 30 years War serves as proof, where Catholics & Protestants slaughtered one another over “graven images”. Hence Goyim ignore their own bloody history in favor of “born again” pie in the sky religious empty rhetoric.

        5. Both Xtian & Muslim avoda zara av tuma theology promotes “I believe” Creeds, such as the Nicene Creed or the Muslim Tawhid Creed. The Sinai revelation defines “faith” not as belief in God – because man cannot grasp the divine. Av tuma avoda zara universally commands – often at pain of death – personal belief in this or that theologically created “New God”. The Name revealed at Sinai in the first commandment never once recognized – not in the Xtian bible nor in the Muslim koran. Translating other “word” names for the Divine Presence “Holy Spirit” which the Torah defines through the revelation of the 13 tohor middot Spirits which Moshe heard at Horev 40 days after the sin of the Golden Calf; its not the calf metaphor, which compares to the dream of Par’o, but rather Yosef’s interpretation of that dream which defines the intent of the Golden Calf! Specifically translating, as does both the bible & koran, the first Commandment Name Spirits unto mere words which the lips of Man can easily pronounce. This critical interpretation – defines avoda zara as seen through the Golden Calf gospel John 1:1.

        The Horev revelation of the “Oral Torah” serves as the revelation of the 1st Commandment Spirits Divine Presence permanently in the yatzir ha-tov hearts of the chosen Cohen people. This post Golden Calf revelation of the k’vanna of the first Sinai Commandment; the greatest Torah commandment because it weighs the hearts of all generations of the chosen Cohen people – do we or do we not accept the Torah לשמה. Clearly, like the Sun in the sky on a cloudless day, the av tuma Universal God theological creed belief system religions, corrupt both the revelation of this Name – Oral Torah Spirits Horev revelation and likewise the concept of faith – the righteous pursuit of justice: as fair compensation of damages inflicted upon Jews by other Jews. Replaced by personal “I believe” theological constructs totally alien to the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. Therefore, once the Church & Mosque exposed in one lie after another, where do both Xtians and Muslims draw the line to their religious house of cards?

        The mitzva of Shema defines Torah faith in the pursuit of justice through remembering the oaths sworn by the Avot – this brit which eternally creates the chosen Cohen people from nothing – the interpretation of the k’vanna of מעשה בראשית twice repeated in the first blessing which precedes tefillat קריא שמע – תמיד מעשה בראשית. Jewish views interpret Shema not as strict monotheism, as a superficial reading of ONE implies. But as a declaration of exclusive oath brit loyalty amid henotheism; Goyim since they reject the revelation of the Torah at Sinai – by definition worship other Gods. Both Par’o and Egypt together with the oath brit sworn at Gilgal testifies that the kings of Canaan like Par’o worshipped other Gods.

        The concept of Gods simply beyond the Human mind to grasp Chagigah 2:1. Fools who attempt to understand that which exists above, below or behind them – better never born at all. This Mishnaic idea utterly rejects any attempt by Man to define the Gods. Torah faith לא בשמים היא prioritizes the struggle between the opposing Yatzirot within the heart, based upon the struggle of Esau and Yaacov in the womb of Rivka.

        The guilt of church support to both Adolf Eichmann and Josef Mengele, as just two examples to assist their escape to South America no after the fact declaration can blot out and remove. Pius XII permitted the Nazis to gather all the Jews of Rome, compares to the recent Red Cross refusal to demand to see the stolen Israeli hostages in Hamas torture tunnel captivity.

      310. Jews aren’t excluded! I judge all war criminals and genocide practitioners from the UK to Timbuktu. At the moment Israel, the USA and Putin are up there with Iran!

      312. The contextual layers of Torah common law legalism. Opposed by the NT Protocols of the Elders of Zion substitute theologies.

        The Torah apparent contradiction reflects different contexts and legal frameworks within the Torah common law legal system. Sh’mote 20:5 refers to a key concept of the oath brit accepted at Sinai; Torah curses based upon the 10 plagues Par’o and Egypt endured. A direct fundamental Torah commandment for all Jews to remember the judicial injustice which the Egyptian slavery eternally recalls within the hearts of the chosen people who alone accept the Torah revelation to this day.

        The 2nd verse from משנה תורה which Goyim refer to as Deuteronomy, the Greek word meaning “second law,” utterly fails – perhaps purposely attempts to conceal – this Book as meaning “Common Law”. The Hebrew name, contained within the very language of this Book משנה תורה mandates powers of “Legislative Review” to the Great Sanhedrin Federal Court in Jerusalem.

        In rabbinic literature, this issue – addressed extensively. For instance, the Mekhilta de-Rabbi Ishmael (a midrash on Sh’mote) and later commentators like Rashi interpret Devarim 24:16 as applying specifically to human courts and judicial proceedings, where individual accountability, enforced without intergenerational punishment. This leaves room for divine judgment, as in Shmot 20:5, to operate on a broader, providential level—potentially through natural consequences of sin rippling across generations, or only when descendants continue in those sins. Targum Onkelos, explicitly qualifies the verse by adding that punishment falls on “rebellious children” who “follow their fathers in sinning,” a reading echoed in Rashi’s commentary to avoid grammatical or theological strain. Similarly, some rabbinic sources distinguish between intentional rebellion against G-d (where collective impact might apply) and other transgressions, viewing the texts as complementary rather than conflicting.

        The Xtian framers of their “Old Testament” substitute theology and revisionist history prioritize belief in theology as religious faith rather than the Torah vision only for the chosen Cohen people who alone accept the revelation of the Torah; faith defined as the righteous pursuit of judicial Sanhedrin court room common law justice which has the power to not only veto laws imposed by Executive Authority/Powers such as a king, but re-write that statute law based upon precedents established court-room Common law.

        A proof precedent gleaned from the separate Goyim NT which has no portion nor shared authority with the Hebrew T’NaCH, their Apostle Paul declared to Goyim: “they are not under the Law” in Galatians 3:24; he claimed that Goyim belief in the NT false messiah JeZeus had replaced the law. This declaration has no legal Torah precedent. In point of fact, halachic common law as codified in the Talmud, based upon the Torah mandate which establishes Sanhedrin Federal common law courtrooms has jurisdiction only when Jews rule the oath sworn lands with political Independence. This condition did not exist in the lifetime of the NT Apostle Paul who lived during Roman rule and occupation of Judea. Furthermore Paul’s writings fail to distinguish the day vs. night obvious differences – gulf – which separates Torah common law from Roman Statute Law.

        Galatians 3:24: Paul’s distinction that Goyim are “not under the Law” introduces a theological shift that many believe undermines the continuity with Jewish law. His perspective arose during the tensions of Roman rule, impacting the context of his writings. By juxtaposing Galatians 3:24 against Romans 6:14: “not under the Law but under grace”, Paul switches the narrative away from Torah common law courts to a Xtian theology/religious belief system. Where the Church prioritizes “Grace” – the 5th Oral Torah revelation at Horev to Moshe on Yom Kippur 40 days after the sin of the Golden Calf where assimilated and intermarried Israelites “substituted” the word-name אלהים for the Holy Spirit Name revealed in the first Sinai Commandment.

        The revelation of the Torah at Sinai forever separates the Divine Names earlier employed in the Book of בראשית/Genesis. Those Divine Names such as אל, האל, אלהים, אל שדי express a vision of God in the Heavens. Whereas the Sinai revelation permanently changes this narrative לא בשמים היא that the spirits of the Divine Presence revelation as further clarified and defined by the 13 Oral Torah middot revelation where Grace functions as the 5th attribute of the Holy Spirit Name revealed at Sinai! Acceptance of the revelation of the Torah caused these 13 tohor Divine Spirits to live within the Yatzir Tov hearts of the chosen Cohen people alone for all eternity.

        The NT by stark contrast JeZeus instructs his disciples to pray to “their father in heaven”. While the Pauline theology’s substitute theology replaces Torah common law faith unto Grace & JeZeus as messiah. This substitution of religious theology for Torah common law courts radically shifts the narrative – on par with the Aramaic declaration “Abracadabra”, where a magician pulls a rabbit out of his hat! The later Church priests declared the Oral Torah as non existent while declaring Xtian believers under Grace and not under Law. An obviously absurd declaration seeing that all societies and civilizations without law fall into chaos anarchy Tower of Bavel like Civil War.

        The Oral Torah 13 middot serve to define the Divine Presence Spirit Name revealed in the first Sinai commandment which affixes the life of this Holy Spirit within the Yatzir Ha-Tov of the chosen Cohen people living on this Earth and not in the Heavens as the prayer of JeZeus instructs his believers how to pray.

        Heaven and Earth separates Torah judicial justice as faith where the middot Spirits of HaShem live within the Yatzir Ha-Tov hearts of the chosen Cohen people who live on this Earth, from church theological substitution beliefs that JeZeus sits on Mt Olympus together with his Father in Heaven. A gulf so huge that only Jefferson’s Constitutional First Amendment which separates Church from State – even remotely comparable! Jefferson’s principle emphasizes that governance should not be unduly influenced or dictated by religious doctrine, similar to how Jewish practice operates within its own legal and ethical framework, independent of external theologies.

        Bottom line: Torah judicial common law only applicable to when Torah blessings cause Israel to stand as an Independent nation, such as the two Wars of Independence fought in 1948 and again in 1967 achieved. G’lut exiled Jewry – despised refugee populations scattered across the Middle East, North Africa, and Europe past Russia – Christ Killer Cain Jews – have no rights nor authority to impose judicial common law courts, and even less authority to have prophets enforce those judicial rulings through prophetic mussar in any foreign land where Goyim despise and abhor Jews as sub-humans only fit for Shoah extermination.

      315. The situation in Gaza has been described by various organizations and experts as potentially constituting genocide, particularly in light of the actions taken by Israel against the Palestinian population.
        Claims of Genocide
        Amnesty International’s Findings: A recent report by Amnesty International concluded that Israel is committing genocide against Palestinians in Gaza. The report details acts such as killings, causing serious bodily harm, and inflicting conditions of life intended to destroy the Palestinian population physically. Amnesty emphasizes that these actions demonstrate a specific intent to destroy Palestinians in Gaza, which aligns with the definitions outlined in the Genocide Convention.
        1
        UN Experts’ Warnings: UN experts have also raised alarms about the situation, stating that the ongoing violence and humanitarian crisis in Gaza could lead to the annihilation of the Palestinian population. They highlight the indiscriminate nature of the attacks, which have resulted in significant civilian casualties, including many children, and call for immediate international intervention to prevent further atrocities.
        1
        Scholarly Perspectives: Experts have noted that while the legal definition of genocide requires proving intent to destroy a group, the broader understanding of genocide encompasses large-scale destruction and acts against a population. This perspective allows for a more inclusive interpretation of the term, which some argue applies to the current situation in Gaza.
        2
        Legal Context: The International Court of Justice (ICJ) is currently hearing a case brought by South Africa against Israel, alleging genocide. This case underscores the ongoing debate about the classification of the actions in Gaza and the responsibilities of states under international law.
        1

        5 Sources
        Conclusion
        The classification of the situation in Gaza as genocide is a complex and contentious issue, with significant implications for international law and humanitarian response. Various organizations, including Amnesty International and UN experts, assert that the actions taken against Palestinians may meet the criteria for genocide, while legal definitions and interpretations continue to evolve in the context of ongoing conflict. The international community is urged to take action to address the humanitarian crisis and prevent further escalation of violence.

      320. T’NaCH understood today.

        The T’NaCH requires close analysis. קוהלת\Qoheleth–Ecclesiastes 10: Qohelet = case law on public folly; particularly in aspects of speech and leadership. It instructs mussar case law for judges, leaders, and citizens; exploring how even small acts of folly can overshadow wisdom and destabilize social order. It warns that wisdom is fragile, and society collapses when fools rule. A profound meditation on the fragility of wisdom and the dire implications of folly, especially in public spheres. The prophetic teachings of Amos and Zephaniah provide critical context, capturing the essence of how individual folly can escalate to societal crises.

        קוהלת\Qoheleth 10, about the public consequences of irrationality or lack of wisdom in decision-making. The Torah idea of “fear of heaven” = “reputation”, a much later ethical‑Hasidic development Oral Torah logic interpretation נמשל, and not directly comparable to the biblical משל. However, mesechta ברכות teaches that the משל dream follows the נמשל interpretation; later generations employ Oral Torah logic to interpret the k’vanna of the Torah revelation as it meets the needs of their current generations. Clearly g’lut Jewry during the horrors of the Dark Ages did not “need” to interpret the Torah as a political Constitutional document.

        In its original frame, Torah is a Constitution for a free people ruling their land through courts and mishpat. G’lut by stark contrast, the same Torah – read primarily as inner avodah and survival wisdom, expressed through Judaism “converted” into a religion. Both address the reality of different times and different lands and societies Jews g’lut forced to endure. Consequently the k’vanna of time-oriented Torah commandments changes to address the situations the brit Cohen people face and endure—and modern readers should not confuse the later nimshal with the original mashal.

        Torah does not “change,” but the kavanah with which it is lived shifts dramatically depending on whether Israel is sovereign in its land or living as a scattered minority in g’lut. The stark contrast between Blessing and Curse obviously apparent. G’lut Jewry had no courts with coercive power. They had no National Army. As despised refugees with no political rights, the church outlawed Jewish ownership of land; despite the economies of all Dark Ages societies based upon agricultural based economies!

        The Sanhedrin courts together with their Prophet police enforcers of judicial Din rulings, specifically through the prophesy of mussar limited to times when Jews rule their Homelands as an Independent free nation. G’lut Jewry enjoyed no political autonomy – EVER. Written Torah does not Change. However the lights of Hanukkah teach that g’lut Jews (Jews ruled by Goyim) forget the Oral Torah which instructs the mussar the k’vanna of wisdom commandments/time oriented mitzvot throughout the Ages. The determination of kavanah, absolutely required to sanctify wisdom Torah commandments, lived differently in sovereignty and in exile.

        The Holy Writings – 3rd part of the T’NaCH – serve as the basis/comentary which interprets the k’vanna of the NaCH prophets mussar. In like and similar fashion the later Gemara functions in the role of the Holy Writings to interprets the k’vanna of the Mishna. Hence both this and that qualify as Primary Sources in Jewish Torah literature.

        This contrasts with the still later Reshonim scholarship, which at best exists as merely a secondary “gossip” source, unfit to serve as a court witness; Torah common law courtrooms only accept eye witness testimony. The Book of D’varim, also know as משנה תורה – which has absolutely nothing (no common ground) with the Rambam’s statute law Greek deductive logic. Rabbi Akiva’s פרדס inductive logic defines how the Sealed – Primary Talmudic sources – interpret the intent of the earlier sealed – Primary T’NaCH sources of Jewish common law. Courtroom common law shares nothing with the much later Goyim theological belief systems, and/or their obtuse av tuma avoda zara theologies; any more than Rambam’s halachic statute law code serves as a commentary to the Talmud. G’lut Jewry cursed by the Torah curse – impossible for Jews to obey the Torah לשמה – based upon the First Sinai commandment; g’lut Jews remain in לאו דוקא Egypt.

        Rabbi Yechuda named his Sha’s – Mishna based upon משנה תורה as the second name of the Book of דברים; both Written Torah and Oral Torah instruct common law. The Mishna’s Case/Rule style and Gemara’s Difficulty\Aswer (Prosecution/Defense) both address the central theme of court room common law. Hanukkah teaches that forgetting Oral Torah = forgetting how to live Torah as law.

        In like manner the Holy Writings of the T’NaCH function as the Gemara (Case/Din) precedents which make a משנה תורה-common law re-interpretation of the language of the NaCH (Mishna) Prophets. Both T’NaCH and Talmud instruct common law; the former “mussar common law, and the latter “halachic common law”. The common law commentary of the Baali Tosafot brings “off the Dof” precedents which defines its commentary to the Talmud because common law stands upon the foundation of Judging a judicial case by comparison of pro vs. con judicial precedents against the current case heard before the codified Mishnaic Sanhedrin courtroom rulings. Hence the Baali Tosafot common law commentary to the Talmud stopped and did not make a g’lut משנה תורה k’vanna definition of the language of the Mishna. Torah – most simply – a common‑law courtroom legal system, not a religious statute law code.

        Protection of ones’ good name – defines the k’vanna of fear of Heaven based upon אל מלך נאמן –awe, moral accountability, oath brit obedience; a key understanding of k’vanna required to obey Torah wisdom commandments/time-oriented mitzvot which require k’vanna. Drosh a key basis of rabbi Akiva’s פרדס interpretive kabbala of Oral Torah.

        T’NaCH does not teach history, Oohelet’s “good name” not the issue. T’NaCH commands prophetic mussar because the Torah revelation applies equally to all generations of the chosen Cohen people in all generations. Isaiah 28:9–13 instructs the mussar: about mocking, expressed through the משל – God’s word; rejecting prophecy, and suffering oath brit curse consequences. Qohelet 10 simply does not instruct this mussar.

        Therefore, what NaCH prophet(s) most resembles as a common law precedent? Excluding Isaiah 3, Jeremiah 5, Hosea 4, and Micah 3. Invite the reading audience to tell me why these prophetic sources fail to qualify as precedents to understand the intent of Ecclesiastes 10 as a T’NaCH common law Primary Source commentary to the Torah Constitution?

        Israel did not come out of Egyptian bondage to sit in Grand tents to get religion. Rather, once freed from slavery they embraced with zeal the Torah commandment to invade, conquer and rule the oath sworn lands with righteous judicial justice which dedicates (just like a korban dedicated) the pursuit of justice among our people – meaning court imposed fair compensation of damages inflicted.

        Does “small folly outweighing wisdom” represent the essence of Oohelet 10? No — it’s one of the chapter’s themes, but not the essence of the whole chapter. Oohelet10, a collection of wisdom sayings, not a single unified argument. It deals with: The fragility of reputation which contrasts between wisdom and folly. The danger of foolish speech, seems to go together with instability of political power – Shlomo’s collapse as king following his avoda zara.

        The opening proverb — “Dead flies make the perfumer’s ointment stink” — illustrates a principle, not the 10’s entire message. Wisdom – valuable but fragile; folly is small but destructive. The “folly” of g’lut Jewry: they forgot the Oral Torah and replaced it with Greek deductive logic and Roman statute law models. In the world of Torah common law, the NT/Protocols of the Elders of Zion forgery fraud prioritizes the metaphor of Paul’s “original sin” or “piety which believes in JeZeus as the Messiah of Mankind;” despite the simple fact that by the words of Paul: “Goyim not under the law” and therefore Goyim cannot determine the k’vanna of wisdom commandments such as the time-oriented commandment of Moshiach. Argue that the NT likewise a Roman forgery not different than the Protocols – both this and that exist as revisionist history & substitution theologies on par with the Muslim Koran.

        The emphasis of this interpretation seeks to “Crack the ethical containment force” of Xtian societies. Much like as the American & French revolutions cracked the ethical containment force of Church/State, Arristocrat\citizen parameters which likewise defined Czarist Russia till the 1917 Russian Revolution. The Bolsheviks, according to both Troskii and Lenin, based their understanding of Marx’s socialism upon the French revolution. Other examples of cracking the ethical containment force as the basis of revolution: the Nazi revolution which like the previous examples too rejected the Church/State parameters. And the Iranian revolution which rejected the Church/State parameters established by the Shah of Iran. In all these precedent case study examples: cracking the ethical containment force resulted in Troskii’s “Permanent Revolution” … Civil War expanded to surrounding societies … know as WWI and WWII and the Iraq/Iran war etc. As described by the opening verses of the Book of בראשית.

        Chaos and anarchy define every “Civil War” throughout Human History. Both Xtianity and Islam resulted in horrific wars which produced great empires which later fell into a repeating anarchy and decay cycle. Every civil war in human history – defined by chaos and anarchy. Any civil war simply not limited to a local conflict—but rather represents the radical Tower of Bavel breakdown of the shared moral framework, there described as “language”, that holds a society together. The Nazi revolution returned Xtian Europe back to primitive barbaric societies, specifically through the Shoah crimes duplicated by both Mao and Stalin, and later by Pol Pot and other sub-human barbarians. Something like scratch a Xtian or Muslim and expose a barbarian. Revolution therefore “cracks the ethical containment force” which holds human society together. And this results in a Human blood bath. The specific references to Church and Mosque – simply לאו דוקא by definition.

        The latter serve as models. No different that the T’NaCH and Talmud function as “models” to establish the Torah Constitutional Republic which mandates common law Federal Sanhedrin courtroom justice. Every civilization rests on an ethical containment force—a shared moral language that holds society together. When that containment force cracks, the result: chaos, anarchy, and often civil war. This pattern qualifies as a universal and not tied to any one.
        religion or culture. Revolution cracks the ethical containment force that holds a society together. When that force collapses—whether in religious, secular, imperial, or revolutionary contexts—human beings of any background can descend into chaos, anarchy, and atrocity.
        This pattern described in Bereshit and repeated throughout human history. This is exactly how T’NaCH uses Egypt, Bavel, Assyria, and Rome—not as ethnic judgments, but as models of political‑moral systems. Exactly how T’NaCH uses Egypt, Bavel, Assyria, and Rome—not as ethnic judgments, but as models of political‑moral systems.

        The Power of Small Things: a small act of folly can outweigh a lifetime of wisdom and honor. Refers to “fear of heaven” understood as Baal Shem Tov/Master of ones’ Good Name reputation. This represents the essence of Ecclesiastes 10 mussar. This does not make a depth analysis precedent interpretation of Isaiah 28: 9-13? The T’NaCH concept of “fear of heaven” requires a stretch to include the name of a much later Hasidic post Cossack pogrom master called Baal Shem Tov.

        Such a stretch known as טיפש פשט. The spiritual Torah ideal of “fear of heaven” has nothing what so ever to do with a 17th Century founder of Hassidic dynasties. The reference which connects “baal shem tov” understood long before the Cossack revolt – that a wise man strives to protect his good name reputation. Herein the Talmud interprets the k’vanna of “יראת שמים” as a wisdom commandment commonly referred to as a “time-oriented” commandment.

        Isaiah 28:9–13 criticizes people who mock prophetic teaching and refuse to listen. Therefore what prophetic mussar most resembles to the main theme expressed by Oohelet 10? Oohelet 10 perhaps best understood viewed through the lens perspective of Amos and Zephaniah. They both emphasize the societal impacts of folly and the importance of ethical behavior, which closely aligns with the chapter’s themes. The excluded sources, they focus on broader themes of oath brit fidelity, collective behavior, and systemic issues rather than the individual consequences of folly that Oohelet specifically addresses.

        Oohelet 10: Main focus of mussar – Public consequences of small folly, speech, power; foolish rulers, dangerous speech. Amos: Social injustice, corrupt elites, hypocrisy; ruling class self centered arrogance destroys society. Zephaniah: Complacency, bloated Ego-I, moral decay in public life; oath blessing/curse brit (based upon the 10 plagues of Egypt – remember Egypt) on a society dulled by self-centered stupidity.

        Isaiah 28:9–13 about mockery of prophecy itself—the refusal to hear mussar. That’s a different “case” than Qohelet 10, which assumes the reality of leaders corrupt over estimation of themselves, and asks: what happens when it leaks into speech and power? Qohelet: “Folly – set in many high places… slaves on horses, princes walking like slaves.” Amos: rulers’ folly and injustice invert the moral order and rot the social fabric. Qohelet describes the phenomenon; Amos delivers the indictment and sentence.

        Zephaniah: This prophetic mussar targets the Yatzir Ha-Raw: complacent, self‑secure Jerusalem; officials, judges, prophets, priests kiss-ass & corrupt. Those who say “Hashem will not do good nor evil” live in a kind of spiritual folly—practical atheism. Qohelet: warns how foolishness in leadership and speech destabilizes life. Zephaniah: shows that such folly simply not just “unfortunate”—it summons divine Torah brit curse judgment. Qohelet gives the mussar psychology of “masturbation”; Zephaniah gives the oath brit\blessing or curse consequences.

        Qohelet 10 = mussar precedent on the public consequences of individual popped bloated Egos—especially in speech and power. Amos & Zephaniah = mussar precedents on how that same stupidity, when normalized and systemic, becomes a basis for din against a society. Isaiah 28 = meta‑precedent: what happens when a people no longer even accept mussar as binding—when they mock the very category of rebuke; Isaiah 28 – related, but one level up: it’s about the refusal to hear any of this.

      328. A Classic example of how the heart and soul of Torah gets lost in Goyim tits on a boar hog translations.

        “There came also a multitude out of the cities round about unto Jerusalem…” In Acts 5:16, the Greek phrase perix tō Ierousalēm simply refers to, nearby towns, surrounding villages, local communities in Judea — a geographical description of the region immediately around Jerusalem in the early 1st Century. No manuscript—Greek, Latin, Syriac, Coptic, or otherwise—contains anything resembling “Fort Worth” in Acts 5:16.

        The phrase “round about unto Jerusalem” simply means the towns and villages surrounding Jerusalem in the 1st century. Fort Worth founded in 1849, almost 1,800 years after Acts was written. The Book of Acts written before any of the gospels were ever penned.

        There is no ancient place named Fort Worth anywhere in Judea, Samaria, or the Roman Empire. The Book of Acts written before any of the 4 gospel Roman Protocols of the Elders of Zion “counterfeits”. That the church fathers organized their NT fraud with the gospel followed by Acts as corrupt as Fort Worth!

        The earliest gospel of Mark written in Rome, perhaps prior to the destruction of Herod’s temple abomination. One Roman guard famously quoted as saying, “Its better to be Herod’s dog than a family member!”

        If the Book of Acts was written in 62 CE then it predates any gospel of Mark “speculation”. Gossip narratives and speculation do not replace eye witness first hand information. Hence debates upon the NT as “historical” evidence as false as a mad hatter. Historians have no clear evidence one way or the other. Such a debate clearly separates the emphasis of the T’NaCH Jewish literature vs. the Xtian NT literature. Prophets command mussar they to not teach history. The NT fraud requires a physical historical man JeZeus. Otherwise this fraud religion collapses like a house of cards.

        Acts ends with Paul alive. No mention of Paul’s death. No mention of the Temple’s destruction. Therefore Acts was written before 70 CE, possibly around 62 CE. But all this 2000+ years later speculation fails to address the main point. T’NaCH commands mussar not history. Rava for example teaches that Job existed as a fictional imaginary man. The point of the Book of Job, to teach the mussar of g’lut and redemption from g’lut. This places the Book of Job on par and similar to the Book of Sh’mot – the 2nd Book of the Written Torah. The attempts by “scholars” thousands of years after the fact to argue that Mark preceded Acts – simply Pie in the Sky speculative nonsense.

        The merit behind interpreting the NT as the equivalent of the Russian secret police Protocols of the Elders of Zion slander employed to justify the pogroms of the late 19th Century …

        Just as similar speculation that Paul served as an Agent Provacateur of Rabban Gamliel of the Great Sanhedrin. Jews in Judea and Alexandria Egypt locked in brutal and bitter war. Alexandria with its huge library burnt to the ground prior to the destruction of Herod’s Temple abomination.

        Why the reference ‘Temple abomination’? Starting with the avoda zara of king Shlomo who first built the Temple abomination of avoda zara. The prophet Natan forbade king David to copy how Goyim civilizations worshipped their Gods. Just as Rehovoam ignored the advice of Shlomo’s advisors, so too Shlomo ignored the council of the prophet Natan. The Beit HaMikdash not a building of wood and stone idolatry but rather the establishment of the Federal Sanhedrin common law legal court system!

        T’NaCH “wisdom” literature serves to “understand” Av Torah time-oriented commandments which require prophetic mussar as their k’vanna. The historical Books of Kings, a prophetic work, does not teach theology (the Xtian interpretation) but rather it give a big picture contexts to the Books of the Prophets! This qualifies as כלל פרט according to the middot of rabbi Yishmael. Mussar does not mean “ethical instruction”. The latter an entirely false parameter of prophesy. Mussar defines the k’vanna of the 13 tohor middot Oral Torah revealed to Moshe 40 days after the sin of the Golden Calf wherein the ערב רב assimilated and intermarried Jews translated the revelation of the Spirit Name who fills the Yatzir Ha’Tov heart – the נמשל of the Mishkan משל.

        The church fathers read the Book of Sh’mot as history rather than as prophetic mussar. The Torah speaks in the language of Man, it instructs mussar through משל\נמשל model/paradigm. The Creation story of the Universe instructs through this משל of 6 days time, to teach the mussar נמשל of time-oriented commandments wherein “time” understood as “wisdom” – משל\נמשל.

        Hence the church Old Testament New Testament propaganda falsely conceals the open fact that the literature of the T’NaCH radically different from the revisionist history propaganda of the letters of Paul and the Roman Protocols of the Elders of Zion slander forgery. Both Paul introduced in Acts served as an Agent Provacateur to undermine the false messiah Roman propaganda of Mark’s JeZeus. Paul by declaring brit melah as a void Torah commandment undermined the influence of the Roman false messiah gospel narrative prior to the outbreak of the great Jewish revolt in 66 CE. Paul traveled to Rome to inject a form of monotheism into Roman polytheistic society. With the purpose to undermind the foundations of Roman civilization; to crack the “Ethical Containment Force” of Roman soceity.

        Paul’s propaganda aimed to promote Civil War in Rome based upon Yehuda Maccabee’s propaganda which publicly declared Judea’s loyalty to the “real” king of the Syrian Greek empire! This Pauline propaganda based upon the generic כלל: “If it aint broke don’t fix it.” Obviously this modern rendition seeks to emphasize that Torah as a common law precedent based legal system shaped how ancient Jewish civilizations revolted against the Syrian Greek and Roman empires.

        The scholarship of ancient texts has nothing to do with a Greek Athens democratic model. The revelation of the Oral Torah פרדס inductive logic sh’itta starkly contrasts with ancient Greek philosoplers, specifically Plato and Aristotle’s deductive logic of static reasoning. פרדס logic a fluid logic similar to Calculus varables. Whereas Greek logic deductive & static, similar to Euclid’s plane geometry.
        ___________________________________
        If the T’NaCH, most essentially mussar and not history, what—if anything—do you think gets “lost in the translation”, similar to Fort Worth – when Conservative, Reform Judaism start defending T’NaCH on historical or archaeological grounds, instead of on its power as prophetic mussar?
        _______________________________________________
        This question delves straight into the Rambam Civil War? During the Dark Ages, the roads built by the Roman empire had totally collapsed. People stopped traveling distances due to the risks of being attacked and murdered. Interstate commerce totally collapsed. Jewish communities scattered across the face of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa, how could they maintain some type of standardized culture and customs which would prevent Jews from assimilating to the dominant cultures and customs of the peoples wherein they lived as a despised refugee minority populaiton which had no rights???

        Scholars starting with the B’HaG and Rif organized Talmudic common law into something new and all together different than what the Framers of both the T’NaCH and Talmud originally envisioned. Originally the T’NaCH organized mussar middot into a Common law, precedent based, middot system which compared one NaCH sugya to similar NaCH sugyot which contained the identical set of Oral Torah middot. By aligning two or more sugyot which had the same set of Oral Torah middot (‘ה’ ה’ אל רחום וחנון וכו), this comparison of sugyot called דרוש; this alignment of similar (precedent based middot) served as something like the rear and front sights of a rifle which permitted the “sniper” to kill a target down range.

        This “kill” משל has the “k’vanna” נמשל. Hence the later Talmud based upon the משל of a loom which has opposing warp vs. weft threads. The k’vanna of the Framers of the Talmud, to create a literature of Great Sanhedrin judical court room rulings (the Mishna) together with its prosecution and defense attorney precedent debates (the Gemara). Therefore the Framers of the Talmud wrote this ancient text to serve as the judicial model for the future time when Jews would slaughter the Roman occupiers of Judea and re-establish Jewish National Independence like as occurred in 1948 and again in 1967 CE.

        Do Jews feel anger for Xtian and Muslim war crimes perpetrated against low hanging Jewish refugee easy victims. Jews no different than any other Human being abused by tyrrants. But the bottom line for the Framers of both the T’NaCH and Talmudic literature, not to promote Jewish anger and hatred against our oppressor cruel Par’o like enemies; any more than the Book of Sh’mot promotes anger and hatred against the Egyptians! In point of fact the Torah directly commands a negative commandment which forbids Israel to hate either specifically Egyptians and Esau in general. Esau the metaphor for Xtian Europeans.
        ____________________________________
        What gets lost when Jews defend Tanakh as history instead of prophetic mussar?
        The substance of allTanakh literature: to create an oath brit alliance which obligates all generations of Israel to dedicate tohor middot in how we interact and exchange with our people; middot-driven, common-law consciousness that “understands” time as wisdom – most specifically as time-oriented Av commandments which require prophetic mussar\interpretations of the k’vanna of tohor Oral Torah middot. And g’lut-exile interpreted through משל/נמשל – blessing/curse Torah oath brit. And not through the lens of Greek proof or Xtian biography revisionist history or substitute theology NT or Koran Gods.

        The day and night difference which for ever separates the Hebrew T’NaCH from either the Xtian NT or Arab Koran – translating poetry into prose — keeps the words, buth the rhythm, the soul, the imperative to “understand” (like from like distinctions) through mussar prophetic tohor middot – lost in the sophomoric translations. Gone, like Fort Worth in Acts.

      336. Torah mitzvot shaped and determined through Sanhedrin common law lateral courtrooms בלבד. The Torah’s system of mitzvot—both d’oraita and d’rabbanan—finds its authoritative determination exclusively through the lateral common law deliberations of the Sanhedrin. Torah common law never exists as statute law as expressed through independent legislators annulling or innovating mitzvot outside courtroom jurisdiction.

        The rejection of bat kol in mesechta Bava Metzia 59b (the tanur shel Akhnai) crystallizes this: “Lo ba-shamayim hi” (Devarim 30:12) means post-Sinai, halacha follows majority human reasoning in beit din, not heavenly voices or charismatic claims. Prophets courtroom justice enforcers independently enforce or rebuke. They do not legislate or override courts of Sanhedrin Common law.

        Acts 16:16-40 Necromancy = seeking authority, knowledge, or salvation from the dead. If a human who died becomes: prayed to; invoked; obeyed; trusted over Torah law — then functionally, it is דורש אל המתים, regardless of metaphysical claims. The NT’s moshiach narrative, ignores the core: Leading in “war” (crises) to uphold courtroom restitution (e.g., Sanhedrin as nimshal to Beit HaMikdash’s mashal).

        The Torah Law mitzva of Moshiach, this mitzva applies equally to all Jews in all generations. The Torah mitzva of Moshiach exists as an expression of a servant, like Moshe and all the NaCH prophets, of Torah common law court police enforcers. The Book of Shmuel does not make king David into a theological belief system ‘new covenant’ God. Mesechta Baba Metzia :נט reject the authority of a בת קול voice from heaven as having any judicial authority on this Earth.

        Acts 16:16–18 is not a neutral miracle story. It is a classic confrontation between Torah-prohibited practices and a pagan economic system. Encounter with the Slave Girl (Verses 16-18)/witch. The girl is explicitly described as having a πνεῦμα πύθωνα — a Python spirit, tied in Greek culture to Delphi, Apollo, and divination.

        The act of Paul commanding the spirit to depart from the girl in Acts 16 can spark discussions about necromancy, witchcraft, and the broader context of spiritual authority. The accusation against Paul and Silas reflects a significant cultural conflict. They were promoting a different way of life that challenged local practices, including those tied to economic interests. The girl’s ability to tell fortunes, considered a source of income for her owners, was rooted in practices the Jewish Torah condemned.

        This maps cleanly onto אוב וידעוני in Torah language (Devarim 18). Paul’s act is not prophetic justice. But rather an extrajudicial charismatic intervention, devoid of Sanhedrin authority, witnesses, or jurisdiction. This prophetic mussar interprets this av tuma story as an unlicensed manipulation of spiritual forces outside of Torah courtroom common law. As such this NT story more counter-witchcraft rather than prophetic mussar which the Torah commands.

        The concept of resurrection in Xtianity indeed provokes a variety of interpretations and discussions, especially when viewed in the context of the Hebrew Scriptures (Torah) and traditional Jewish beliefs. The Torah does not explicitly describe resurrection in the way that later Xtian dogmatism does. There are sections of T’NaCH משל and Aggadic/Midrashic examination of the mystic work of the Book of Daniel 12:2 (Many of those who sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake, some to everlasting life, and some to reproaches, to everlasting abhorrence”) – often read midrashically or kabbalistically through halachic lenses. However this סוד kabbalah interpreted through the lenses of halacha, defines how פרדס רמז\סוד weave together as warp vs. weft threads of a Talmudic loom which defines the cultures and customs practiced by the chosen Cohen people alone.

        2 Kings 2:11 Elijah is described as being taken up to heaven without dying – illustrates a different understanding of life after death compared to the resurrection concept presented in Xtianity. 2 Kings 2:11, Eliyahu does not die. No burial, no resurrection, no glorified corpse. Eliyahu – removed from the human legal domain, not elevated into divine mediation. Eliyahu returns as messenger, not object of worship. He resolves ספקות, restores halachic clarity. He never annuls mitzvot or introduces new covenants. Malachi 3:23-24 and Sanhedrin 98a Elijah restores clarity to mitzvot, not annuls them.

        Elijah’s experience does not support the Xtian dogma of resurrection but rather suggests other forms of divine interaction with humanity. Xtian dogma of resurrection seen as establishing a ‘new covenant’ between God in Heaven and humanity. This off the path redefinition life, death, and the divine relationship negates the revelation of the tohor spirits of HaShem’s 13 middot living within the Yatzir Ha’Tov of the chosen Cohen people.

        Necromancy traditionally involves summoning the dead for knowledge or power. If one views calling upon JeZeus—who is believed to have risen from the dead—as a form of necromancy, it presents a complex interpretation that challenges conventional understandings. Within Xtian theology, Jesus is not viewed merely as a deceased figure but as the risen Savior who transcends death. This fundamental belief shifts the interaction from necromancy to communion with the living God; a direct violation of the 1st and 2nd Sinai commandments!

        The Xtian ‘New Covenant’ belief in JeZeus’ resurrection – central to Xtian Av tuma false messiah avoda zara which introduces the dogma that JeZeus overcame death and now lives in a glorified state in the Heavens with his Father. This abomination negates: D’varim: לא בשמים היא. The Xtian resurrection witchcraft later spawned Muhammad the false prophet’s 72 virgin theological narishkeit. The prophetic mussar which forbade king David to build the Beit HaMikdash likewise corrupted by inept טיפש פשט Am ha’aretz stupidity.

        Unlike Rambam (Maimonides), who emphasized spiritual immortality in the world to come and interpreted resurrection more cautiously (in his Iggeret Techiyat ha-Metim defending its literalness but subordinating it to intellectual reward), Ramban stresses a more physical, embodied afterlife. He critiques overly spiritualized views, insisting the verse “admits of no other interpretation” than literal resurrection (echoing Rambam’s own defense in his Treatise on Resurrection, though Ramban expands on the mechanics). The mitzva of Moshiach clarifies halacha based upon the precedent of Eliyahu who does the same. The Ramban grounds the סוד concept of resurrection firmly in Torah tradition; it serves divine justice, rewards the righteous (tzaddikim/maskilim who shine like stars, per v. 3), and upholds the 13 middot through tohor judgment—resurrection simply not anything approaching the NT metaphysical elevation of man into God, bypassing halachic courts or Torah observance.

        The Torah mitzva of Moshiach stands upon the Torah precedent of Moshe anointing the House of Aaron as Moshiach – dedicated to drive, lead, guide Israel in a korban like dedication to actively pursue righteous justice among our conflicting peoples within the borders of the oath sworn lands. Just as a koran limited to the confined jurisdiction of the Mishkan so too and how much more so Sanhedrin common law courts, together with their prophetic enforcement police – limited strictly and only to operate within the borders of Judea alone.

        The theological narratives surrounding JeZeus and Muhammad illustrate the complexities of Torah judicial justice as faith apart from the menstrual blood tuma beliefs, and avoda zara spirituality which define the cultures customs and practices developed by European, Arab & Muslim cultures. These Roman and Arab religions share no common ground with Israel brought out of Egypt to conquer Canaan to rule that land with judicial common law justice.

        2 Samuel 11-12 David’s moral failure to judge Uriah the baal of Bat Sheva with justice. David’s attempt to cover up his implied adultery (the Talmud refutes this charge) by recalling Uria from battle – in the hope that he would have relations with his wife forced David to make a far more radical solution to his problem. The concealment of Uriah’s death as a consequence of war – herein defines the language “blood on his hands” by the prophet Natan. Furthermore, the curse of eternal Civil War imposed upon king David. Unlike Shaul whose dedication of the mitzva of Moshiach utterly profaned Natan commanded the mussar that Civil War would persue all generations of king David consequent to the “blood on his hands.”

        The NT false messiah Roman Protocals of the Elders of Zion forgery – totally ignores the key Torah concept of Moshiach as defined to lead the nation in times of “war” (an undefined participle) to rule the land with Judicial courtroom justice which makes fair restitution of damages inflicted by one bnai brit upon another. Hence just as the Sanhedrin Federal Court system defines the נמשל k’vanna of building the Beit Ha-Mikdash משל; absolutely no different from the Mishkan משל to the לא בשמים היא revelation that the tohor 13 Oral Torah middot forever judge the heart of the chosen Cohen people!

        The Torah mitzva of Moshiach the Roman fraudulent NT propaganda cannot substitute itself for any Torah commandment because by the terms of the Apostle Paul – Goyim not under the Law. Just as Goyim cannot negate the mitzva of brit melah so too and how much more so Goyim religions of Av tuma avoda zarah cannot determine the Torah mitzva of Moshiach. The mitzva of Moshiach directly bound, like Yitzak at the Akadah, to the leadership of guiding the people in times of War to not loss faith and fail to pursue righteous judicial justice both among our people and against our enemies in times of crisis or war.

      345. I actually think you’ll find I am. I am not authoritarian or racist. I’m not making derogatory remarks about any group of people. I call out injustice and violence. I call out genocide.

      351. Second Sudanese Civil War 1983-2005, estimated death toll 2 million. Somali Civil War, Ongoing since 1991, – 1\2 million estimated death toll. Rwandan Civil War 1990-1994, approximately 1 million killed. Burundian Civil War 1993-2006, about 300,000 killed. Liberian Civil Wars 1989-1997 & 1999-2003, 250,000 killed. Angolan Civil War 1975-2002, 1 million killed. Darfur Conflict 2003-present, 300,000 to 500,000 killed. Central African Republic Civil War 2012-present, some 10,000 killed. Tigray War 2020-2022, 600,000 killed.

        Yet you scream and slander Genocide Genocide Genocide over 65,000 Gazans killed following their Oct 7th surprise attack! Go fuck yourself.

      352. Oh, so 65,000 innocent people slaughtered, the entire area reduced to rubble, hospitals, schools and civilian homes targeted, food and water used as weapons. That doesn’t count as genocide? Fuck off!

      355. No killed by the USA in a war that should never have happened. Two wrongs do not make a right. Don’t be so stupid.

      357. Contrast the avoda zara philosophy promoted by Maharishi from the sealed masoret of T’NaCH, Talmud, and Siddur

        Maharishi Mahesh Yogi (1918–2008) is best known for developing Transcendental Meditation (TM) and for his broader philosophies surrounding consciousness, meditation, and personal development. His teachings blend Eastern spiritual traditions with modern scientific insights, emphasizing the potential for personal and collective transformation through meditation.

        Transcendental Meditation (TM), a simple technique where individuals meditate for about 20 minutes twice a day, focusing on a specific mantra. The practice aims to promote relaxation, reduce stress, and enhance overall well-being. Maharishi’s philosophy posits that there are different levels of consciousness, ranging from the individual ego to universal consciousness. Achieving higher states of consciousness is seen as vital for personal growth and societal harmony.

        A significant aspect of his philosophy is the idea that individual well-being contributes to global peace. Maharishi advocated for group meditation initiatives, suggesting that collective practices could foster a more peaceful world. The heart of Maharishi’s teachings lies in the practice of TM, helping individuals achieve depth of consciousness and inner silence. Maharishi integrated Ayurvedic principles into his teachings, emphasizing natural health and the balance between body, mind, and spirit. He developed programs focused on stress reduction, creativity enhancement, and improved quality of life through meditation.

        Maharishi’s Concept: The text outlines two realities: the “Absolute,” which is unchanging, and the “relative,” which is ever-changing. This duality is central to understanding life and consciousness. T’NaCH: In Judaism, God is often described as unchanging (Malachi 3:6: “For I, the Lord, do not change”). However this minor prophet contrasts with the day and night change between God in Heaven as depicted in the Book of בראשית, to the God within our hearts – revelation of HaShem at Sinai.

        The Talmud encompasses the “world view” model of Sanhedrin common law courtrooms. Case/Din halacha serves as בניני אבות judicial precedents wherein the Gemara sugyot interpret and re-interpret different perspectives how to both understand the language of a sugya of Gemara; but most essentially to make, so to speak, a legislative review/משנה תורה-multiple different perspective analysis of the witness language of a specific Mishna.

        The Maharishi’s concept of “Being”, for example, fails to address the ever present crisis of Jewish assimilation and intermarriage with Goyim who reject the revelation of the Torah at Sinai – HaShem לא בשמים היא – a D’varim vision that Torah does not come from heaven. A Talmudic example found in ברכות which presents an Aggadic story of a man who sleeps in a grave yard and told that Man can only do mitzvot in this world and not in the world to come. Meaning doing time-oriented commandments with the k’vanna לשמה fundamentally and absolutely requires a Yatzir Ha-Tov spirit which breathes tohor Oral Torah middot within the beating heart of a bnai brit Man living in this world.

        The Talmud emphasizes the distinction between tefillah and prayer – comparable to the Divine Names whereby the Avot perceived God in the Heavens above as opposed to the post Sinai root faith that HaShem’s Divine Presence Shekinah breaths tohor middot within the Yatzir Ha-Tov within our hearts on this physical Earth below. Hence its directly pronounce the Name of HaShem because this living spirit Name simply no more a word than its possible to compare anything in the Heavens, Seas, or Earth to HaShem.

        Contrast the false Maharishi’s concept — his projected ability of individual beings to reflect the “Absolute”, this total narishkeit nonsense declares the notion of expanding mind and heart through awareness and harmony with universal being. This contrasts with HaShem understood in the Talmud as a local god which only the 12 tribes of Israel accepted at Sinai with the Universal Monotheistic theological rhetoric promoted by both Xtianity and Islam’s Universal Monotheistic God(s).

        The Maharishi’s religious rhetoric narishkeit promotes mystical kabbalah excuses! His “Kabbalistic perspective” describes the process of personal and collective consciousness expanding as one engages more deeply with divine truth. Torah by contrast defines faith as צדק צדק תרדוף – pursue judicial common law justice in this world – specifically within the brit lands sworn as the eternal inheritance of the Avot chosen Cohen seed within only the borders of Judea. Sanhedrin Courts with their prophetic police mussar enforcers only have jurisdiction within the borders of Judea. Yonah being an exception due to the king of Assyria made a mass deportation of the people of the kingdom of Samaria deported to Assyrian lands by force.

        T’shuva refers to b’nai brit remembering the sworn oath made unto the Avot that they would father the chosen Cohen people. After Yonah traveled to the kingdom of Assyria – the Babylonian empire conquered that kingdom shortly thereafter. Prophets never sent to Goyim who never accepted the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. Contrast the Koran where it declares that prophets sent to all nations and lands to warn of approaching societal collapse; where those “prophets” speak in the native language of the people being warned! Goyim in all times and generations never accepted the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. Prophets command mussar only to the chosen Cohen people who accept the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. Hence the Koran, like the New Testament – both Av tuma avoda zara.

      359. The Meaning of Trump leadership: America First Doctrine. America First as Restoration, Not Innovation. 1913 as the Yankee Constitutional Breaking Point; the transformation of the US Republic to a managerial bureaucratic government behind the government. The illegal Administrative State as a De Facto 4th Branch unconstitutional Main branch of the Federal government that has supplanted Congress like Truman’s turning to the UN to declare War causing the Korean crisis.

        The Biden Era “Green Agenda” as dead as the mental capacity of Biden to think. The absolute disgrace of mass hysteria over ‘global warming’ or ‘government enforced socialist health care – like the mass Covid-19 injections – which treated humans as some ‘Western medicine corporate monopoly guinea pigs! Pie in the Sky mass hysteria – sucks.

        Clearly Russia today does not compare to post WWII USSR; modern Europe does not in any way shape or form compare to post Oct 7th 2023 Gaza! The time has come for the US to pull its troops out of Germany and all Europe! European societies need to wean themselves from the American tits. The Trump Administration, by taking over S. American oil reserves and Greenland’s critical minerals serves to maintain post WWII American economic dominance, especially when challenged by BRICS counter-currency; competition the basis of economic health.

        Europe a post Shoah cursed childless dying society that’s fast transforming its culture unto a Muslim dominated civilization. Actions have their consequences, the guilt of the Shoah disgrace has murdered the religion and good name reputation of Xtianity. The establishment of the EU a clear “over-reaction” to two 20th Century European Civil Wars. The “One Size Fits All” Soviet socialism collapsed in failure back in 1991. Restoration of European nation state political independence represents the European framers vision post the Napoleonic wars!

        Western European states must respect post Napoleon and Hitler invasions of Russia through the Ukraine. Better to partition Ukraine like unto 19th Century Poland than assume that Russia post these two horrific Western European utterly crushed defeats of imperialism/invasion – to preach while standing on a soap box that Russia must accept the inevitable that the Ukraine joins NATO. Especially when the US intends to get out of NATO, in accordance with the founding Fathers of America which strongly advised not getting entangled into European alliances … but rather focus and maintain the Monroe Doctrine.

        The “Big Three” explicitly agreed to respect Soviet security concerns. Hence the Great Powers established Eastern Europe as a buffer zone to protect from still another Western invasion attempts in the future. Stalin’s demand blunt: Never again allow a hostile military power to mass on Russia’s western frontier. The unification of Germany – began the negation and crooked Western chisel away from the West’s commitment to respect the concerns of Stalin post war. James Baker (US Sec. of State) famously said: “NATO will move not one inch eastward.”

        Russia sees NATO expansion as encirclement, no different than Arab State encirclement of Israel. Post 1991 NATO kept expanding without integrating Russia. NATO expansion violates the spirit of the Big Three agreements. Russia will never accept NATO on its borders, most especially Ukraine. While the Big Three agreements not a formal treaty, my grand father taught me: if a Man’s word: no good, the Man no good.

        Post WWII America can never return the released genie from its bottle of 1930s American Isolationism any more than post Napoleon and Hitler invasions Russia will ever willingly permit Western European domination. This post war reality will only change if and only if Europe defeats both the US and Russia in a third World War!

        American Industries cannot “compete” if they flee to foreign lands with cheap labor costs like as happened under Post WWII bureaucratization “Sovietization” of Washington bureaucracies! The government establishment of Corporate monopolies – starting with the Federal Reserve abomination under Wilson in 1913 requires immediate uprooting. Not the place of Washington to manage a controlled economy like both LBJ and Nixon “managed” the Vietnam defeat from DC! This means Washington must restore the Commerce Clause and the 10th Amendment – States Rights – which the Trump Supreme Court started with revoking Roe vs. Wade; the abortion industry only the States of the Republic should regulate. The same holds true with Agriculture, Healthcare, Insurance in all shape manner and forms starting with the Social Security fraud.

        To maintain US economic growth and dominance, especially post WWII wherein the US supplied the oil and gas etc to the Allied war effort against the Central and Axis alliances, America First must never forget the post Andrew Jackson independent banking established in 1825 and the British Hong Kong free banking models.

        America prior to Wilson’s socialism did not require an IRS direct taxation of the American people. Washington taxed the States not the individuals living within the States of the Republic. The inherit corruption of Pelosi and lifetime politicians not as easily tolerated when State Legislatures appointed their two Senate “ambassadors” sent to DC. Pre-WWI US joining the WWI Allied alliance occurred chiefly because Central Bank (private monopoly Federal Reserve) made huge loans to England and France without Congressional oversite and consent! Had Washington joined the Central Alliance in 1917 Britain and France would have negated their debt obligations to America much like post Bolshevik Russia did with its loans made with European central banks.

        In the 19th Century Washington relied primarily upon imposing protective tariffs upon foreign governments industrial competition with American goods and services. Obviously during the American Civil War Lincoln’s ‘greenbacks’ modified Jackson’s ‘free banking’ by forcing banks to hold US treasury bonds. The first federal income tax was a temporary wartime measure during the Civil War (Revenue Act of 1861), imposing a 3% flat rate on incomes over $800, later graduated to 5% on higher earnings.

        The 16th Amendment, ratified in February 1913 (just before Wilson’s inauguration), explicitly allowed Congress to levy income taxes “without apportionment among the several states.” This enabled the Revenue Act of 1913, creating a graduated federal income tax (1% on incomes over $3,000, up to 7% on over $500,000) and expanding the Bureau of Internal Revenue (precursor to the IRS). Critics at the time, and since, viewed this as enabling “socialism” by centralizing fiscal power, shifting from state-apportioned burdens to direct individual taxation. This change marked a key expansion of federal authority, aligning with Progressive Era reforms but diverging from the Founders’ emphasis on limited central government.

        The early 20th Century post Civil War shift away from the States-Rights American Republic unto direct elections “democracy” ignores the basic facts of Confederate concerns of Central Government domination over the State, like as exemplified by the The post Civil War Interstate Commerce Act of 1887 negated the States Rights Commerce Clause of the US Constitution. This Act, according to the popular rhetoric propaganda (Obamo like “change” political slogan) sought to curb the monopolistic practices of railroads, particularly the unfair pricing strategies and discrimination against certain customers and promote competition.

        Bunk. Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC), the first federal agency established to regulate economic activity across the board! Not simply limited to Railroad monopoly abuses!

        The Interstate Commerce Act marked a critical shift in the balance of power between state and federal authorities. By regulating interstate commerce, the federal government asserted its authority over economic activities that previously fell under state jurisdiction, challenging the States’ Rights perspective that had been a significant aspect of the U.S. political landscape.

        The Interstate Commerce Act laid the groundwork for future federal regulation of various industries beyond railroads, influencing later legislation related to telecommunications, airlines, and more. It set a precedent for the federal government’s role in regulating interstate commerce, establishing a framework for ongoing regulatory bureaucratic State behind the State revolving door bureaucrats with Corporate monopoly “experts”, commonly known today as the Industrial military complex.

        By the 1820s–1830s (e.g., Tariff of 1828, the “Tariff of Abominations”), rates rose to protective levels (averaging 40–60% on dutiable imports) to foster domestic manufacturing. This system reflected Hamiltonian ideas of using tariffs for industrial development. Post-Civil War, high protective tariffs (e.g., Morrill Tariff of 1861 and later acts) persisted, funding Reconstruction and industrial growth while generating surpluses in peacetime. This tariff-heavy model kept federal power limited—no need for a permanent income tax or large bureaucracy—aligning with states’ rights and limited government visions.

        Lincoln/Secretary Chase’s National Banking Acts (1863–1864) centralized the Greenback fiat monopoly money/currency to finance the Civil War Yankee imperialism. States do not compare to counties within States as Lincoln sought to dictate. Lincoln’s creation of nationally chartered banks which required all banks to hold U.S. Treasury bonds as backing for their notes, this standardization of US currency stabilized the US dollar during the Civil War crisis. It taxed state banknotes heavily (10% tax in 1865) to drive them out.

        This approach not only helped manage the economic chaos but also laid the foundation for Wilson’s corrupt IRS/Centralized Bank standardized currency system. Greenbacks complemented this by providing immediate liquidity. By taxing state banknotes, Washington effectively encouraged a shift towards federal currency, thereby consolidating control over the monetary system and minimizing the risks of inflation.

        Greenbacks (Legal Tender Act, 1862): Issued $450 million in fiat currency (backed by future taxes, not gold) to fund 60% of war costs (~$3.2 billion total). Forced banks to accept them and hold U.S. Treasury bonds (National Banking Acts, 1863–1865), creating the First National Bank system. This centralized banking ~1,600 national banks by 1865, crowding out state banks via a 10% tax on their notes. Inflation hit 80% by 1864, but greenbacks were redeemed in gold by 1879 (Specie Resumption Act).

        The Supreme Court’s 1886 Wabash decision, which invalidated state regulation of interstate rail rates as violating the Commerce Clause (exclusive federal domain) compares to how Roe vs Wade made Washington Big Brother so completely dominant over States economic autonomy. The Commerce Clause (Article I, Section 8) – interpreted by Yankee victors to allow federal preemption when activities crossed state lines or affected interstate flow. This challenged Southern/Confederate-era states’ rights concerns about central domination, as railroads symbolized Northern industrial power post-Civil War.

        Initially, the Act applied only to railroads—the first industry federally regulated. The ICC’s scope expanded later via amendments (e.g., Hepburn Act 1906 added pipelines, terminals; Motor Carrier Act 1935 added trucking/buses). In the 1880s–1890s, it was railroad-focused, though it set the template for future agencies (e.g., FCC for telecom, CAB for airlines). Critics argue it birthed the “regulatory state,” with bureaucrats often drawn from (or returning to) the industries they regulated—creating capture and monopoly entrenchment rather than true competition.

        Rep. William Bourke Cockran called the 16th Amendment and Revenue Act of 1913 (the post Civil War Yankee ‘Progressive Centralization pivot) “Socialism”!!! Because it shifted the burden of Washington raising money away from foreign competitors in business to US citizens. It funded Wilson’s corrupt ‘New Freedom expansion rhetoric propaganda (e.g., FTC, Clayton Act). Madison in Federalist No. 10 warned against factions using direct taxes for redistribution of US citizen wealth. By their fruits you shall know them: By 1920, income tax raised 58% of Federal revenue, enabling welfare state growth like LBJ’s Great Society rhetoric propaganda. Passage of the

        17th Amendment (1913) compounded this, replacing state-legislature Senate picks with popular vote—eroding states appointing Federal Senators as ambassadors of State legislatures sent to negotiate with Washington. Establishment of the ICC “Obama-like ‘change’ birthed the first independent Federal regulatory agency octopus monster illegal 4th Branch of the US Government in direct violation of the 3 branches of the US Government established by the Constitution.

      361. You see only skewed shit, cause your type full of shit. Pig shits like yourself love to denounce the smell of shit as if your shit doesn’t stink. Idiot coward the guilt of the Shoah not limited to only Nazis like yourself.

      362. The standard Nazi tactic is to call everyone else Nazis. I don’t support genocide and war – that’s you.

Leave a Reply