Anti-Semitism is prejudice, hatred or hostility towards Jewish people.
Criticism of the extreme right-wing Israeli government with their policy of genocide towards Palestinian people is not anti-Semitic. It is no different to criticising Trump. Criticism of Trump is not anti-American.
BTW – criticising Netanyahu and the genocide of Palestinians is not showing support for Hamas.
Hamas is a dirty terrorist group whose actions are repugnant to all civilised people.
Netanyahu and his government are evil bastards whose actions (of starving women and children and blowing up civilians) are repugnant to all civilised people.
Dumb ass you know nothing of anti-semitism. You’re just an arrogant dumb ass Goy with an inflated opinion of bull shit.
Thank you Moshe. I taught about anti-semitism and racism. Criticising a government for its racist genocidal policies is not anti-semitism. I only wish the Germans had called-out Hitler for what he was and the Americans call out Trump for what he is. Netanyahu is wanted for war crimes. We may yet see him in court.
An uppity nigger who cleans the house of his slave master. You know nothing of antisemitism because you know zero of Amalek. And what causes Amalek to raise its ugly Opher-dopher Head throughout the generations.
More nasty racism!
Bitch bitch bitch. You vile arrogant hairy ass of a dog’s pussy. YOU assume you have the right to slander the Israeli PM and US President?! Cunt slime due to gang rape you utterly stink.
That’s right a pair of Nazis!
Takes a Nazi fat bloated pig to call out inferior races like Trump and Bibi. Fuck YOU faggot Nazi.
Germans have a long bloody oppressive history of scape-goating Jews and promoting Goebbels anti-Jewish propaganda.
While some may view comparisons between the Nakba and the Holocaust as inappropriate or revisionist, others argue that such comparisons can serve to highlight the ongoing struggles for justice and recognition faced by different groups. The discourse surrounding these issues is often polarized, reflecting deeply held beliefs and historical grievances on all sides. The comparison between the two events is indeed a contentious issue, and many people hold differing views on the appropriateness and implications of such comparisons.
Initially, many Arabs referred to the events of 1948 as a military disaster or defeat in the context of the Arab-Israeli War, which resulted in the establishment of the State of Israel. In the immediate aftermath of the 1948 war, Arab leaders and commentators described the events as a military failure, particularly in light of the expectations that Arab forces would successfully prevent the establishment of Israel. This perspective emphasized the military aspects of the conflict and the perceived disgrace of the Arab states in failing to achieve their objectives.
Initially, the term “Nakba” was used to describe the military defeat and the failure of Arab states to prevent the establishment of Israel in 1948. This perspective emphasizes the military and political dimensions of the events. The fact that many Arab states did not grant citizenship to Palestinian refugees has been a point of contention. Critics argue that this refusal has contributed to UNWRA, the ongoing plight of generations of Palestinians and has been used politically to maintain their status as refugees rather than integrating them into host countries.
Concerns about historical revisionism are valid, especially when narratives are perceived to distort established facts or diminish the significance of particular events. Engaging critically with these narratives is essential for understanding the complexities of the conflict.
The Holocaust was a systematic genocide that resulted in the murder of six million Jews and millions of others, including Roma, disabled individuals, and political dissidents. The Nakba, while involving significant displacement and suffering for Palestinians, occurred in a different historical and political context. Many argue that conflating the two events diminishes the specific historical significance of the Holocaust.
Concerns about historical revisionism arise when narratives are perceived to distort established facts or diminish the significance of particular events. The use of the Holocaust in political discourse, especially in ways that may seem to equate it with other forms of suffering, can be seen as an attempt to revise or reinterpret history in a way that is not accurate. The discourse surrounding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is often polarized, with deeply held beliefs and historical grievances on all sides. To equate the Palestinians to the Shoah directly compares to Joseph Goebbels Nazi propaganda which distorted reality to fit the Nazi/Arab narratives. Fact remain rock solid: All Arab Israeli war the result of Arab refusal to validate the 1947 2/3rd UN General Assembly vote which recognizes the equal rights of the Jewish people to achieve self determination in the Middle East based upon the League of Nations accepted Balfour Declaration.
The refusal of many Arab states to grant citizenship to Palestinian refugees has been a significant point of contention. Critics argue that this has perpetuated post ’67 Six Day War “status” of Balestinians, (Arabs cannot pronounce the letter P) as refugees and contributed to their ongoing plight, complicating the narrative of displacement. The discourse surrounding the Holocaust and the Nakba is often fraught with concerns about historical revisionism. When narratives are perceived to distort established facts or diminish the significance of particular events, it raises valid concerns about the accuracy and integrity of historical discourse.
The 1947 UN General Assembly Resolution 181, which recommended the partition of Palestine into Jewish and Arab states, is a critical document in the history of the conflict. The rejection of this resolution by Arab states is often cited as a pivotal moment that contributed to the ongoing conflict.
Erhard Arendt’s shift in focus from the historical context of the Holocaust to advocating for the Palestinian cause can be understood through his life experiences and the socio-political environment in which he operated. Specific details about when or how this shift from disgraced post WWII German to Arab propaganda promoter, when exactly this occurred in his personal beliefs, not widely documented. His advocacy for the Palestinian cause may have stemmed from a broader commitment to fighting against oppression and injustice, reflects the systematic German hatred of Jews. While it is clear that Erhard Arendt became an advocate for Palestinian rights, the exact timeline and motivations for this shift are not extensively documented. Arendt’s shift toward advocating for Palestinian rights scape-goats the Jews just as classic Church ”cursed Cain” propaganda promoted throughout the Ages.
It is true that Jews have been blamed for killing Christ and scapegoated through history in many European countries. So were pagans and followers of the old religions (witches). Gypsies, Quakers and other groups were also subjected to prejudice, violence and death.
Sadly that is the nature of religion -racism, division, fear, hate and tribalism.
Now the Jewish Government is meting out genocide against Muslim Palestinians.
Religion is an evil force!
In many European countries. Fuck YOU – in all European countries especially England! You know nothing about witchcraft. My daughter studies to become a Eastern meridian witch doctor! Go fuck yourself you bloated puke. Subject to “death”. No people die of old age – dumb ass. Gypsies, Quakers and Jews violently murdered! You bloated conceited fool. You clean up your own Government abominations. Stop sniffing the butt of your own peoples rot and blame Jews that you stink of death. Oct 7th Dumb ass – has its consequences just as did the attack on Pearl Harbor or Hitler – your father – decision to invade Poland. Idiot.
Whether it’s Christians burning witches, Nazis burning Jews or Jews bombing and starving Palestinians – same shit!
Jester Josef G now makes more pompous declarations of condemnation and equivocations. In logic equivocation is an informal fallacy resulting from the use of a particular word or expression in multiple senses within an argument. It is a type of ambiguity that stems from a phrase having two or more distinct meanings,
Opher says – quite clearly- Israelis are behaving like Nazis. Their actions are disproportionate. They are committing war crimes bombing and starving civilians. It is an act of GENOCIDE.
What’s hard to understand??
Why foolishly inverting, mocking and denying? That just makes you complicit with genocide.
Jester play Opher says. Leading the cheerleaders with his virgin wrinkled dried-up dick.
Jester the clown, he has such a short memory, especially when its British doing the killing!
A widely cited report by the Iraq Body Count project, which tracks civilian deaths, estimated that between 2003 and 2011, there were approximately 100,000 documented civilian deaths due to violence. Other studies, including those published in medical journals, have suggested higher figures, with estimates sometimes exceeding 600,000 excess deaths when considering the broader impacts of the war, including indirect deaths from the collapse of healthcare and infrastructure.
Clearly Sinai & Horev stand as the Zenith of the revelation of the Torah.
The Torah operates as common law, founded on evolving precedents, not statutory declarations—exposes a deep conceptual error in how Xtian theology has often misrepresented the Torah. Torah simply not a statute law code of Hammurabi – the 6th king of Babylon. Statute Law – simply a different breed of fish from judicial common law.
Statute law by definition, some kind of Legislative decree(s) ruled by the Government. Torah common law the court justices do not receive a salary from the State. The Torah refers to this vertical legal system as “bribery”. British common law the justices receive their salary from the State.
Shabbat, for example, commanded before Sinai, in the wilderness of Manna (Shemot 16), where no tablets had yet been given, and no voice thundered from the cloud. This precedent constitutes as a legal reality, a lived ruling. And when Shabbat appears again in the two versions of the Decalogue—one in Shemot, the other in Devarim—Xtian translations note minor differences and call them contradictions. But these are not contradictions—they expose case law interpretations! “Shamor” and “Zachor” simply not two commands but two angles of the same diamond, revealed through the evolution of judgment.
Our sages taught: Israel heard only the first two commands directly from the Divine before recoiling, pleading that Moshe receive the rest (Makkot 24a, Shabbat 88b). The church response, both Popes and Kings decreed the burning of the Talmud. Ten Commandments do not remotely qualify as the revelation of the Torah common law judicial legal system.
Torah, not simply revealed in a flash. But this revelation unfolded in the tent of meeting, in the wilderness, in the courts of elders. D’varim/Mishna Torah 100% not a simple repetition of Sh’mot. The mitzva of shabbat essentially remembers the enslavement of Israel in Egypt. Just as that enslavement oppression did not occur just one day of the week but the entire week, so too and how much more so Shabbat does not mean only the 7th day but rather the entire week.
Xtian theology flattens the Torah revelation into a compartment slogan. Torah common law does not comparable to children’s nursery rhyme stories. The printing press cannot reproduce the 4-part logic system of the Divine Name which has 4 letters. To address the Sinai revelation divorced from the oaths sworn by Avraham Yitzak and Yaacov utterly degrades and undermines the foundation upon which Sinai stands.
Xtian theology misconstrues Torah by treating it as statutory law rather than a precedent-driven judicial common law system. The Torah operates as judicial common law, founded on evolving judicial precedents, not statutory Legislative decrees. This fundamental flaw exposes a deep conceptual error in how Xtian theology has historically misrepresented the Torah.
Statute law is vertical, legislative, top-down. It is imposed by the sovereign ruler and enforced by bureaucratic power. It functions by decree. Torah, a judicial common law system built through case rulings, oral transmission, precedent, and collective adjudication לשמה. Interpreted to mean, according to the kabbalah of rabbi Akiva: פרדס. The judges of Torah do not receive salaries from the state, and the Torah itself declares that such financial entanglement with government constitutes shochad—bribery (Devarim 16:19).
In contrast, modern states pay their judges, and their rulings enforce the will of Parlieament. Torah judges, by contrast, remember & interprets the sworn Avot oaths as law from within the brit alliance masoret—not enforceable political decrees. When the Decalogue later presents Shabbat again—in Shemot 20 and then Devarim 5—subtle Calculus like variables, but crucial different witness testimony distinctions. These differences do not qualify as contradictions. They expose interpretive evolutions—case law adaptations. “Shamor” and “Zachor”—observe and remember—two different but complementary legal perspectives, not opposing slogans. They validate different precedential frames through which to understand the same mitzvah. The sages even interpret them as having been spoken simultaneously—two facets of the same diamond stone.
The Xtian flattening of this into a list of “Ten Commandments,” cut off from halakhic context, entirely misses the dynamic legal character of Torah, and baptises it unto a static fossil discovery, as if words carved into stone. Xtian theology promotes and exposes the meaning of false prophets. Its replacement theology declares these verses, frozen in a single moment, constitute the whole of the Torah revelation. Xtian and Muslim belief in some Universal God(s) ignores that only the 12 Tribes of Israel received the Torah at Sinai. Yet the Talmud teaches (Makkot 24a, Shabbat 88b) that Israel heard only the first two utterances at Sinai before begging Moshe to receive the rest. Have repeated this point like the Torah does the decalogue as a point of emphasis.
In Devarim, the mitzva of shabbat not tied to creation, but to the Exodus. It becomes a political-ethical memory of slavery: “So that your servant and your maidservant may rest as you do… and you shall remember that the Egyptians oppressed their slaves.” The implication profoundly radical: Shabbat simply not merely one day of rest, but a comprehensive rejection of permanent bondage. Just as enslavement afflicted the Israelites every day of the week, so too does Shabbat reshape the entire rhythm of labor and liberty across all seven days. The word shabbat means week.
Torah operates within the four-part logic of the Divine Name (Y-H-V-H)—each letter unfolding layers of י\law, ה/prophecy, ו\wisdom, and ה/judgment. A theology that isolates Sinai from the oaths sworn by Avraham, Yitzḥak, and Yaakov utterly not reverent—rather destructive. It severs the root from the tree, divorcing the revelation from the oath brit Cohen alliance inheritance that breathes life unto all generations of the chosen people.
Religious bunkum.
Jester Josef G pretending he knows the difference between א from ב.
Opher says – quite clearly- Israelis are behaving like Nazis. Their actions are disproportionate. They are committing war crimes bombing and starving civilians. It is an act of GENOCIDE.
What’s hard to understand??
Why foolishly inverting, mocking and denying? That just makes you complicit with genocide.
Look Mommy WordPress has brought out the circus clown. Jester says Israelis behaving like Nazis! LOL This clown’s playing Opher says! The joke on this jester, who masturbates genocide porn – this clown has such a small wrinkled by shrinkage dried-up dick.
Jester the clown, he has such a short memory, especially when its British doing the killing!
A widely cited report by the Iraq Body Count project, which tracks civilian deaths, estimated that between 2003 and 2011, there were approximately 100,000 documented civilian deaths due to violence. Other studies, including those published in medical journals, have suggested higher figures, with estimates sometimes exceeding 600,000 excess deaths when considering the broader impacts of the war, including indirect deaths from the collapse of healthcare and infrastructure.
On June 13, 2025, Israel conducted military strikes targeting Iranian nuclear facilities, which has drawn significant international attention and condemnation. The Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) reported that they targeted multiple military sites, including key nuclear facilities, as part of a preemptive strike aimed at neutralizing what they described as a threat posed by Iran’s nuclear ambitions.
In response to these actions, the United Nations has condemned the strikes, emphasizing the need for diplomatic solutions to prevent escalation in the region. The UN ambassador stated that the decision to strike was an “independent Israeli decision,” indicating a lack of consensus on the appropriateness of the military action.
The strikes reportedly resulted in significant casualties, including the death of a senior commander of Iran’s Revolutionary Guards, which has heightened tensions further. Iranian state media has indicated that missile and drone attacks on Israel are expected in retaliation.
In the wake of Israel’s recent military strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, several major world powers, including Britain, France, Russia, and China, have condemned the actions as “unprovoked.” These nations have expressed deep concern over the escalation of tensions in the region and the potential for further conflict.
The strikes, which occurred on June 13, 2025, targeted multiple sites associated with Iran’s nuclear program, including key military installations. Israeli officials justified the attacks as necessary to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons, citing the threat posed by Iran’s nuclear ambitions.
In their statements, the leaders of Britain, France, Russia, and China emphasized the importance of diplomatic solutions and called for restraint from all parties involved. They criticized the Israeli actions as undermining regional stability and violating international norms regarding the use of military force.
In a significant diplomatic move, Britain, France, Russia, and China have collectively withdrawn their ambassadors from Israel in response to the recent military strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities. This decision reflects the escalating tensions and widespread condemnation of Israel’s actions, which these nations have labeled as “unprovoked.”
The withdrawal of ambassadors marks a notable shift in diplomatic relations and underscores the seriousness with which these countries view the situation. They have called for an immediate cessation of hostilities and emphasized the need for a diplomatic resolution to prevent further escalation in the region.
This action follows a series of international criticisms directed at Israel, with various nations expressing concern over the potential for increased conflict and instability. The UN has also been vocal in its condemnation, urging all parties to engage in dialogue rather than military confrontation.
In a reciprocal diplomatic response to the withdrawal of ambassadors by Britain, France, Russia, and China, Israel has also decided to withdraw its ambassadors from these countries. This move reflects the escalating tensions and deteriorating relations following Israel’s military strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, which have been widely condemned as “unprovoked” by the international community.
The decision to withdraw ambassadors signifies a significant breakdown in diplomatic relations and highlights the ongoing crisis in the region. Israel’s actions have drawn sharp criticism from these nations, prompting them to take a stand against what they perceive as aggressive military actions.
This diplomatic rift is part of a broader context of heightened tensions in the Middle East, with various countries calling for restraint and a return to dialogue to address the underlying issues. The situation remains fluid, and the international community is closely monitoring developments as both sides navigate this escalating conflict.
The UN’s condemnation, backed by the UK, France, Russia, and China, portrays the action as “unprovoked” — a term that reflects political calculus more than legal clarity. Under Article 51 of the UN Charter, a state may use force in self-defense if an armed attack occurs — but preemptive strikes exist in a gray zone. Israel’s argument likely hinges on the “imminence” clause, as articulated in the Caroline case (1837): when the threat is instant, overwhelming, and leaves no choice of means.
Israel’s June 13, 2025 strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities represent a classic case of preemptive self-defense, aligning with the Begin Doctrine — the principle that Israel will not allow enemy states to acquire nuclear weapons. It echoes past operations. (1) Osirak (1981) against Iraq’s nuclear reactor. (2) Operation Outside the Box (2007) against Syria.
Yet the withdrawal of ambassadors by four permanent members of the Security Council — including the two Western nations historically sympathetic to Israel — signals a profound diplomatic rupture, potentially worse than during the 1956 Suez Crisis or 1982 Lebanon War.
But this time, the scope is broader, the stakes are higher, and the diplomatic fallout is far more severe. The reciprocal withdrawals by Israel, we are now witnessing a partial diplomatic isolation of Israel from key global players — a scenario that dangerously echoes the pre-1967 international atmosphere, only now with a nuclear shadow.
The continuity between medieval Church slanders and modern UN blood libels. Iran, a regime openly threatening genocide (e.g., statements by top officials calling for Israel’s destruction), is shielded by powers that once committed or abetted genocide. Those same powers — Britain and France — betrayed Jewish refugees pre-1948, yet now sanctimoniously claim Israel undermines “stability.” Russia, currently engaged in illegal war and nuclear threats in Ukraine, calls Israel’s actions illegal. China, persecutor of Uyghurs and enforcer of state repression, calls for restraint.
These are not neutral arbiters of international law. They are part of a long tradition of holding Jews to impossible standards, demanding “restraint” even when faced with annihilation. The UN has inherited the mantle of Church anti-Jewish theology in secularized diplomatic language. Resolution 3379 (Zionism = Racism) was the modern Inquisition; Today’s condemnation of Israel’s self-defense is the new blood libel; The ICJ’s silence on Iran’s genocidal threats is a political Kiddush Hashem inversion — punishing the victim for refusing to lie still.
Iran will likely retaliate via proxies: Hezbollah, Houthis, and Shi’ite militias in Syria or Iraq. Israel may face multi-front escalation, forcing it into a prolonged regional war.
The Gulf States’ reaction (e.g., UAE, Saudi Arabia) will be critical: they fear Iran, but won’t publicly back Israel under current diplomatic pressure. The US response under the leadership of President Trump contrasts with the European barbaric anti Jewish history.
This is more than a military episode — it’s a constitutional test of Jewish sovereignty. If Israel, as a free Jewish nation, cannot defend itself without being slandered and isolated, then the very post-Holocaust consensus that birthed the UN is shattered. Once again, the Jewish state is punished not for what it does, but for daring to exist — and fight to survive.
Yo shit head, the war has spread to Iran. Why don’t you volunteer to serve in the Iranian army. You can scream genocide!
Moshe – I told you! Violence is not the answer!
Fuck you. Israel enjoys complete Air superiority over Tehran. Dumb Ass, England and France – their share in the balance of power in the Middle East totally and permanently eroded for at least 100 years or more. They exist as 3rd rate powers, excellent revenge for their alliance with the Nazis which led to the Shoah based upon Chamberlain/Opher cowardice which imposed the 1939 White Paper betrayal of the 1917 Balfour Declaration.
More enemies; more hate; more violence – an endless cycle!
Fuck you
If the foundation flawed, the entire building must come down. The Roman new testament counterfeit fundamentally erroneous. Regardless the pigs ear of the Catholic Church or the opposing pigs ear of the Protestant Church, no silk purse possible to make from either treif pig ears.
Prominent leader of the Protestant Reformation in Switzerland during the 16th century, specifically in Zurich. Zwingli’s teachings emphasized the authority of Scripture, yet failed to move beyond sophomoric translations made by Catholic bible scholars. He did not encourage people to learn the original Hebrew T’NaCH. His opposition to the Catholic reliance upon saint worship and employment of images truly a minor issue seeing that he failed to examine the T’NaCH as a Hebrew and Aramaic text. Hence Swiss Protestantism all show and no go just like Catholic practices. Only he masturbated with his opposing hand.
Failure to engage in the original Hebrew/Aramaic texts amounts to tits on a boar hog undergraduate scholarship. He failed to address the Nicene perversion which employed theology to create a Trinity God belief system as the standard of faith RATHER than the Torah definition of faith as righteous Justice pursue! The retarded Protestant Reformation compares to a child born XXX or XXY chromosome mutation.
The emphasis on original texts, such as the Hebrew Bible (Tanakh) and the complexities of early Christian doctrine, is a significant aspect of theological scholarship and debate, which Zwingli theology utterly failed to explore and grasp. The Protestant revolt – its failure to address the Central Nicene Council utter perversion of faith, comparable to the fictional mythology of Mary’s virgin birth abomination which directly imported Zeus as the father of Hercules.
The Nicene Creed negates the revelation that nothing in the Heavens, Seas, or Earth compares to God. The Nicene Creed, established in 325 CE, was intended to unify Christian belief regarding the nature of Christ and the Trinity, affirming the divinity of Jesus and his relationship to God the Father. It ignored the T’NaCH text which openly declared that “God is not a Man”. Furthermore, the Protestant Reformation utterly failed to address the elephant locked inside the China Closet…the mitzva of Moshiach — an Oral Torah commandment. Oral Torah expressed as T’NaCH prophetic mussar common law. The bible translations all universally failed to turn to the language of the T’NaCH to define the critical terms within the language of the T’NaCH itself. The term prophet does not mean a seer who foresees the future. Seers who claimed to foresee the future the T’NaCH referred to them as ‘false prophets’. The gospel narrative wherein it makes the claim that Jesus fulfilled the words of the prophets defines the T’NaCH definition of ”false prophesy”.
Translations, let’s start with the opening word of בראשית – Genesis. בראשית contains within its 6 letters ברית אש, ראש בית, and ב’ ראשית. The latter serves as a בנין אב/precedent (Torah being a common law legalism which the new testament forgery failed to grasp.) for the Yatzir Ha’Tov vs. the Yatzir Ha’Ra within the heart; comparable to the struggle between Esau and Yaacov in the womb of Rivka. Yet when the students of JeZeus asked him to teach them how to pray? JeZeus failed to understand that Torah tefillah, which learns from kre’a shma precedent, a matter of the heart.
Meaning a person dedicates holy to HaShem tohor middot which quicken the Yatzir Ha’Tov within the heart and not the tuma middot of the Yatzir Ha’Ra within the heart. JeZeus falsely instructed that his Father God lived in the Heavens rather than within the Heart as the brit sworn between the opposing cut in half pieces internalized the dedication of tohor middot as the expression of the revelation of the 13 tohor middot revealed first to Moshe at Horev ‘ה’ ה’ אל רחום וחנון וכו. Just as HaShem a spirit and not a word so too all these 13 middot – spirits and not word translations. The Yatzir Ha’Ra learns from the sin of the Golden Calf wherein the ערב רב, who lacked fear of אלהים, translated the revelation of the Name contained within the first Sinai commandment, the definition of observance of all Torah commandments לשמה או לא לשמה – something like Shakespeare’s: To be or not To be – that is the question! JeZeus falsely taught his students that prayer directed to some Father God who lived in the Heavens – no different than Father Zeus.
Worse the counterfeit new testament Roman forgery failed to grasp that the opening Book of בראשית introduces the subject of the “creation” of the chosen Cohen people through the dedication of tohor time oriented commandments; like as specifically found in tefillah such as the mitzva of kre’a shma. Tefillah separates and discerns between Yatzir vs. Yatzir like the mitzva of shabbat discerns between Shabbat & Chol, between מלאכה from עבודה. Therefore the false messiah god JeZeus – totally ignorant in how to pray and how to keep shabbat.
False the Koran’s Tawhid Monotheism most certainly does not align with the revelation of the Tribal God of Sinai. Both Xtianity and Islam teach the trief theological declaration of God as a Universal God. The Talmud teaches that only Israel accepted the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. Therefore the revelation of the Torah at Sinai revealed a local Tribal God rather than a Universal God who lives in the Heavens like as Zeus and Jesus.
The Torah story of Israel in Egyptian slavery, it recognizes that other Gods live. The priests of Par’o called upon their Gods to turn water into blood – as a powerful example that the Torah rejects the Xtian and Muslim theology of Monotheism. Therefore since both religions demand from their followers to worship different Gods and both religions do not obey the commandment to obey the Torah לשמה ie first Sinai commandments as the basis of all tohor time-oriented Avot commandments which defines the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. Therefore both JeZeus and Muhammad = false prophets.
Mishnah
The Torah reveals a localized understanding of God, specifically as the God of Israel, and rejects the notion of a universal deity as presented in Christianity and Islam. This understanding is foundational to the Jewish faith and is articulated through the commandments given at Sinai.
Gemara
Challenge 1:
Is it not written in the Torah that HaShem is the Creator of the heavens and the earth, implying a universal aspect to His nature? The Torah employs the language in the act of Creation אלהים.
Resolution:
While the Torah does declare HaShem as the Creator, but rather אלהים, this does not necessitate a universal worship of Him by all nations. The specific Torah oath alliance made with Israel at Sinai establishes a unique relationship, indicating that while HaShem inclusive with אלהים as the Creator, The Sinai revelation of השם within the first commandment serves as the foundation for all the Torah commandments thereafter. The revelation of the Torah at Sinai directed specifically to the chosen Cohen people alone.
Challenge 2:
But did not the prophets, such as Isaiah, proclaim that all nations will eventually recognize the one true God? Resolution:
Indeed, the prophets speak of a future recognition of HaShem by all nations, when these nations recognize Israel as the Chosen Cohen seed of Avraham, Yitzak, and Yaacov. Neither the new testament forgery nor the koran validate Israel as the chosen Cohen seed of the Avot. The koran replaces Yishmael for Yitzak at the Akadah. The prophetic vision of Goyim acceptance of Israel as the chosen Cohen people hardly qualifies as the exalted theologies of belief in One God.
Challenge 3:
How can one assert that the existence of other gods is acknowledged in the Torah, as seen in the plagues of Egypt, without undermining the principle of monotheism? Resolution: The Torah acknowledges the existence of other gods in the context of idolatry and the challenges faced by the Israelites, whose Yatzir Ha’Ra incites them to assimilate and intermarry with Goyim who do not accept the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. Hence the sages teach that the mother determines the Jewishness of the child, based upon the Torah negative commandment for the chosen Cohen people not to marry Goyim women. Therefore among Cohonim the father determines the status of Cohen children and not the mother. The Torah commandment to remember the redemption from Egyptian slavery, who demonstrates His power wherein the 10 plagues judges the Gods of Egypt. This Torah narrative reinforces the concept that while other Gods may be worshipped, they ultimately powerless comparable to an idol carved from the wood of a tree. That same wood used to heat ones’ house and cook ones’ food!
Challenge 4:
If the Torah is meant solely for Israel, how do we reconcile the commandment to be a “light unto the nations”? Resolution: The commandment to be a “light unto the nations” does not imply that the Torah’s laws apply universally but rather that Israel’s adherence to the commandments serves as a model of ethical and moral behavior. This role is to inspire other nations to recognize the wisdom of the Torah – held with respect and awe – rather than kicking the door of the Sukkah because its too hot.
Challenge 5:
What of the teachings of Jesus and Muhammad, who both claimed to fulfill the prophecies of the Hebrew Scriptures? Resolution: The definitions of prophecy in the Tanakh emphasize moral and ethical guidance rather than mere foretelling of events. Therefore, the claims of Jesus and Muhammad to fulfill the prophecies, their teachings diverge from the core principles of the Torah, do not align with the true prophetic tradition. The revelation of the Torah presents HaShem as humbly as a localized deity for Israel, supported by the text of the Torah, the prophetic literature, and the historical context of the Avraham Yitzak and Yaacov oath alliances.
Ignatius of Antioch (c. 35-107 CE), emphasized the idea of the New Covenant as superseding the Old Covenant, suggesting that the laws of the Torah were no longer binding on Christians. He viewed the Jewish law as a precursor to the grace found in Christ. In his letters, Ignatius often contrasts the “old” and “new” covenants, implying that the teachings of Jesus fulfill and replace the Torah. This interpretation overlooks the ongoing significance of the Yom Kippur remembered Sin of the Golden Calf replacement theology wherein HaShem made the sanctification of His Name by doing t’shuva and where HaShem annulled the vow made to Moshe to make of his seed the chosen Cohen people rather than the oaths sworn to Avraham Yitzak and Yaacov.
Justin Martyr (c. 100-165 CE), argued that the Jewish people had failed to recognize the true meaning of the Scriptures and that the Church had inherited the promises made to Israel. He claimed that the Church was the “new Israel.” In his “Dialogue with Trypho,” Justin asserts that the prophecies concerning the Messiah are fulfilled in Jesus, thereby suggesting that the oath alliance sworn at Sinai utterly irrelevant for Xtians. This theology utterly rejects the revelation of the Torah at Sinai, replaced by the Romen new testament forgery.
Augustine of Hippo (354-430 CE), likewise embraced the sin of the Golden Calf “replacement theology,” which posits that the Church has replaced Israel as the chosen people of God. He viewed the Old Testament as primarily a historical account that pointed to the New Testament. Clearly this theology failed to distinguish that the prophets instructed Israel through prophetic mussar – applicable to all generations of the Chosen Cohen people. In “City of God,” Augustine argues that the Jewish people are no longer the recipients of God’s promises, which misinterprets the enduring nature of the Sinai oath brit alliance which Chag Yom Kippur remembers that even HaShem cannot profane a Torah oath.
Islamic Jurisprudence and its Quranic Interpretation. Islamic teachings often present the Quran as a final revelation that supersedes previous scriptures, including the Torah. This perspective implies that the Sinai revelation accepted by the Israelites – no longer applicable. Verses such as Surah Al-Ma’idah (5:44-48) suggest that the Quran confirms previous scriptures but also asserts its authority over them. This interpretation can lead to the view that the Sinai covenant is obsolete, which contrasts with Jewish beliefs about the eternal nature of sworn Torah oaths.
Hadith Literature, emphasizes that the Jewish and Christian communities have deviated from the true path, suggesting that their interpretations of the covenant are flawed. This leads to a dismissal of the significance of the Sinai covenant in Jewish tradition. Islamic Legal Theory (Fiqh) often emphasizes the Quran and Hadith as the primary sources of law. This marginalization of the ethical teachings found in the Torah simply a different Gold Calf replacement theology. The interpretations of post-Sinai covenantal concepts by early Church Fathers and in Islamic jurisprudence reflect significant theological shifts that diverge from the original intent and understanding of the Sinai sworn oath alliances.
To contrast the distortions of the Trinity, the virgin birth, and universal monotheism with Torah halachic examples, we can examine how each of these concepts diverges from the principles established in the halachic-mussar tradition. This approach will highlight the foundational teachings of Judaism and their implications for understanding God, prophecy, and ethical behavior. The concept of the Trinity posits that God exists as three distinct persons (Father, Son, and Holy Spirit) in one essence. This theological construct is central to Xtian belief but is not found in Jewish thought. The Shema (Deuteronomy 6:4) declares, “Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God, the Lord is One.” Where the word One does not declare Monotheism but rather that the 3 sworn oaths made by Avraham, Yitzak, and Yaacov “remembered” and One within the Yatzir Ha’Tov of the chosen Cohen peoples’ hearts. Both T’NaCH common law prophetic mussar and Talmudic common law halachic ritual practices fundamentally abhor avoda zarah as Av tumah spirits which profane the heart through the median of the Yatzir Ha’Ra.
The virgin birth of Jesus is a key doctrine in Xtianity, asserting that Jesus was conceived by the Holy Spirit and born of the Virgin Mary, thus emphasizing the replacement Trinity theology. The concept of a virgin birth undermines the traditional understanding of familial and tribal connections, which are crucial for the re-establishment of the Tribal Republic remembered through the First Commonwealth. The laws of family purity (Taharat HaMishpacha) and the significance of marital relations in Jewish life highlight the importance of human relationships in the context of procreation. The notion of a virgin birth aligns with the Greek mythology and the birth of Hercules a Greek Man-God.
The idea of universal monotheism, as presented in both Xtianity and Islam, suggests that all people are called to worship one God, directly declaring the specific oath Chosen Cohen People brit alliance, that this Torah relationship – no longer relevant. The Sinai covenant (Exodus 19:5-6) establishes a unique relationship between God and the people of Israel, designating them as a “kingdom of priests and a holy nation.” This covenant is specific and particularistic, emphasizing the responsibilities and obligations of the Jewish people. The concept of the Noachide laws refers strictly and only to Goyim known as ‘Gere Toshav’/temporary residents. The 7 mitzvot bnai noach do not apply to Goyim living outside the borders of Judea. Further proof that the Torah revelation has no connection what so ever with the tuma avoda zara of some Universal monotheistic God. The assimilated Rambam perversion of Talmudic common law to Greek/Roman statute law, that treif assimilated Jew embraced the belief in a Universal God. Hence he ruled that the 7 mitzvot apply to all Goyim. But both the court of Rabbeinu Yonah in Spain and the Baali Tosafot in France, specfically in the year 1232, 28 years after this רשע died, agreed with the court of Rabbeinu Yonah and placed the ban of נידוי upon the Rambam.
All religions are fabrications out of the minds of men – power structures!
Like you know shit. You’re the bogus fool who condemns Israel as a Nazi state while ignoring that Britain slaughter 10Xs the number of Iraqi civilian populations and your never said BOO about that! Go fuck yourself.
Day 6 of the Iran war: Iran down on missiles and launchers. Russia has no plans to assist Iran, leaves Iran high and dry. Chinese weapons the IDF has proven them to be a paper tiger just like Iran.
Could Israeli commandos invade and destroy the Iranian Fordow Fuel Enrichment Facility nuclear site. Located near Qom and known for being deeply buried, has not been directly targeted in the initial strikes. However, there have been reports of military actions in the vicinity. The IAEA has confirmed that Fordow remains under safeguards and has not reported any damage from the recent attacks. The Fordow facility, while currently unscathed, remains a focal point of concern for both Israeli and international observers.
Fordow is located approximately 90 meters underground, making it one of the most fortified nuclear sites in the world. Its depth and construction are designed to withstand conventional military strikes, including airstrikes. The facility is heavily guarded, with advanced security systems and military presence, complicating any potential ground assault. Israel possesses advanced military technology, including precision-guided munitions and cyber capabilities, which could be utilized in an operation against nuclear facilities.
Successful execution would depend on accurate intelligence regarding the facility’s defenses, operational status, and the presence of personnel. A well-coordinated operation would be essential, possibly requiring simultaneous actions to distract Iranian forces elsewhere. The deeply buried nature of the site, combined with its security measures and the potential for severe geopolitical consequences.
The destruction of the Fordow Fuel Enrichment Facility by Israel would likely provoke a multifaceted response from the United Nations (UN) and the international community. The UN Security Council would likely convene to discuss the incident. Many member states, particularly those aligned with Iran, would condemn the attack as a violation of international law and Iran’s sovereignty. The incident could lead to strengthened alliances among countries opposed to Israel, potentially increasing tensions in the Middle East. The destruction of the Fordow facility by Israel would likely lead to a complex and multifaceted response from the UN and the international community, characterized by condemnation, diplomatic efforts, and potential escalations in regional tensions.
Disgraced Obama played a significant role in shaping U.S. policy towards Iran, particularly through the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), which aimed to limit Iran’s nuclear program in exchange for sanctions relief. But did nothing toward Iranian ballistic missile production; he and Hillary Clinton illegally spied upon the Trump 2016 Presidential campaign and launched the Russia-gate slander in their attempt to destroy President Trump. Additionally, UN Security Council Resolution 2334, exceptionally prejudiced against Israel. The Trump Administration has utterly repudiated the direction of the Obama Administration, on par with the rejection of Obama Care national-socialism medical insurance dictate imposed upon the American people by the insider trading criminal Nancy Pelosi.
A return to a pro-Western, secular regime in Iran could lead to a strengthening of Iran’s position in the region, potentially countering the influence of Turkey, especially if the new regime seeks to re-establish Iran as a dominant regional power. The geopolitical landscape could shift, with countries reassessing their alliances. Nations that have historically been wary of Iran might find common ground with a new Iranian leadership, altering the regional balance.
If Iran were to regain a strong position under a new regime, Turkey might find its influence diminished, particularly in areas where both countries have competing interests, such as Iraq, Syria, and the Gulf states. Turkey has sought to position itself as a leader in the Muslim world, particularly through its support for various groups and its assertive foreign policy. A revitalized Iran could challenge Turkey’s aspirations for regional leadership.
If the West, particularly the U.S., were to support a new Iranian regime, it could further shift the balance of power. Turkey’s relationship with the West might be affected, especially if it is seen as opposing Western interests in the region. The potential return of a regime similar to that of the Shah in Iran could significantly alter the balance of power in the Middle East, potentially diminishing Turkey’s influence in the region. This scenario would likely lead to a complex interplay of alliances, competition for leadership, and shifts in regional dynamics, with implications for both domestic and foreign policies in Turkey and beyond.
You seem to be enjoying war – not a thought for the innocents being blown to pieces. More enemies, more hate. An infinite number of enemies.
Most definitely enjoying winning this war that started on Oct 7th 2023. Dumb ass You forget the parades held post WWII?! You silly dumb ass.
War News Day 5 President Trump snubs G-7.
To understand North Korea’s political, military, and social structures. This includes identifying key figures, military installations, and potential vulnerabilities. This would include establishing a network of informants within North Korea would be crucial. This could involve recruiting defectors, leveraging existing North Korean expatriate communities, and using covert operatives to gather information.
Mossad would need to develop sophisticated covert operations tailored to North Korea’s unique environment. This could involve infiltration techniques, cyber operations, and psychological operations to influence key individuals or groups within the regime. Enhancing cyber capabilities to penetrate North Korean communications and data systems would be essential. This could provide valuable intelligence and disrupt North Korean operations.
Close collaboration with U.S. intelligence agencies would be vital, given their extensive resources and knowledge of North Korea. Joint operations could enhance the effectiveness of infiltration efforts. Engaging with South Korea and other regional allies would be important for logistical support and intelligence sharing. South Korea’s intelligence services have significant insights into North Korean operations.
Infiltrating North Korea would likely require a long-term commitment, similar to the sustained efforts seen in Iran. This includes ongoing intelligence operations, recruitment, and maintaining a presence within the country. Duplicating Mossad’s infiltration of North Korea to match its success in Iran would require a multifaceted approach involving intelligence gathering, operational planning, collaboration with allies, risk management, and a long-term commitment. The unique challenges posed by North Korea’s regime and its isolationist policies would make this a particularly difficult task, necessitating innovative strategies and significant resources.
Identifying influential leaders and decision-makers within the North Korean regime. Mapping out critical military sites, including missile launch facilities and nuclear sites. Assessing weaknesses in the regime that could be exploited for intelligence or operational advantage. Engaging North Korean defectors who can provide valuable insights and intelligence. Leveraging existing North Korean expatriate networks for information and support. Deploying agents to gather intelligence discreetly within North Korea. Enhancing cyber capabilities to penetrate North Korean communications and disrupt their operations. Engaging with South Korea and other regional allies for logistical support and intelligence sharing, capitalizing on their insights into North Korean operations.
Recognizing that successful infiltration requires a long-term commitment to intelligence operations and maintaining a presence within North Korea. Duplicating Mossad’s infiltration of North Korea to match its success in Iran would necessitate a comprehensive and innovative approach. The unique challenges posed by North Korea’s regime, including its isolationist policies and stringent security measures, would require a combination of intelligence gathering, operational planning, and international collaboration. This endeavor would demand significant resources, expertise, and a long-term commitment to achieve meaningful results.
Meaningful results?? Killing more people?? Identifying targets??
Idiot dumb ass reactionary.
Israel only accepted two commandments at Sinai before we feared that we would surely die and therefore demanded that Moshe receive the rest of the Torah. What’s the “rest of the Torah”, not just the 611 commandments within the language of the Written Torah but all the halachot capable of rising to the sanctity of time oriented tohor commandments from the Torah itself! Herein defines the intent of the 1st Sinai commandment … to obey the revelation of HaShem לשמה.
LORD not the Name revealed in the 1st Sinai commandment and therefore LORD comes under the 2nd Sinai commandment. The same apples to God, Yahweh, Jesus or Allah etc.
The day of Shabbat approaches, but this tohor time oriented commandment does not rest at one day of not doing מלאכה/work but all the rest of the six days of not doing forbidden עבודה on the 6 days of “shabbat”. Raising positive and negative commandments – which do not require prophetic mussar as their k’vanna to tohor time oriented commandments which do require prophetic mussar as their k’vanna – as learned in the first Book of the Written Torah – בראשית. This first word of the Torah בראשית, it contains both a רמז, meaning words
within words of ראש בית, ברית אש, and ב’ ראשית but more it contains a סוד: the idea of tohor time oriented commandments which includes all the halachot contained within the Talmud! Hence the Gra taught the kabbalah that בראשית contains all the commandments of the Torah. Torah, by definition includes all the Halachot of the Talmud, according to the B’HaG’s Hilchot Gadolot, a commentary that Pre-Adamites the Creation of Adam and the Garden.
The next three Books of the Written Torah contain תולדות commandments; positive and negative commandments do not require k’vanna as do tohor time oriented commandments. What distinguishes a tohor time oriented commandment from תולדות commandments and halachot contained within the Talmud? A tohor time oriented commandment requires the dedication of the Yatzir Ha’Tov which breathes tohor spirits from within the heart. The בנין אב/precedent by which Torah common law\משנה תורה/ learns בכל לבבך\כם within the kre’a shma as publicly taught by Rabbi Yechuda Ha’Nasi in one of his Mishnaot within the mesechta of ברכות, the concept of עבודת השם – the key יסוד (which contains סוד) of doing mitzvot לשמה, a person must dedicate tohor middot (( The revelation of the 13 tohor middot revealed to Moshe at Horev 40 days after the substitute theology known as the sin of the Golden Calf )), by sanctifying a tohor spirit which breathes within the Yatzir Ha’Tov within the heart. JeZeus when asked by his disciples did not understand this fundamental and basic kabbalah/סוד. He taught his disciples: “Our Father who lives in Heaven …” Wrong. Tefillah a matter of the Yatzir Ha’Tov within the Heart. Dedicating a spirit does not compare to blowing air from the lungs as expressed through the precedent of blowing the Shofar. Its not the blowing of the shofar that elevates this mitzva unto a time oriented tohor commandment! But rather the affixation of t’keah, tru’ah, and sh’varim to the positive, negative commandments all as tohor time oriented commandments which remember the oaths the Avot Avraham Yitzak and Yaacov swore the oath ( ONE in the opening p’suk of kre’a shma. ), to serve HaShem לשמה through time oriented commandments.
Because both the gospels and new testament never teach this fundamental סוד\יסוד Jews recognize JeZeus as a false messiah.
More religious twaddle.
More moronic noise.
The phrase “The Kingdom of God is within you”, Luke 17:21. The phrase “The Kingdom of God is within you” (Greek: ἡ βασιλεία τοῦ θεοῦ ἐντὸς ὑμῶν ἐστιν) is often cited by Christian theologians as evidence of a spiritualized, internalized kingdom that supersedes Jewish political-national hopes. In Luke 17:20–21, the P’rushim (Pharisees) ask JeZeus when the Kingdom of God would come.
It’s a theological dismissal of the national Avot sworn oath brit alliance which creates יש מאין the chosen Cohen people and swears the oath alliance brit wherein this Chosen people inherits the oath sworn lands. The reference “kingdom of God”, refers to the mitzva of tefillah which requires שם ומלכות. However if a person observes with a critical eye, neither the tefillah from the Torah: kre’a shma, nor the rabbinic commandment of tefillah: the Shemone Esrei, neither this nor that contains the fundamental requirement which rabbi Yochanon defines the qualities which separate making a blessing contrasted by saying Tehillem … a blessing requires שם ומלכות.
So what makes kre’a shma and shemone esrei a blessing rather than a praise like Tehillem which does not contain שם ומלכות? Answer: both kre’a shma and shemone esrei exist as positive tohor time-oriented commandments … which by definition requires k’vanna. Specifically the k’vanna of the wisdom which discerns swearing a Torah oath by means of making a blessing FROM saying or reading praises like as contained in the Book of Tehillem with its 150 prayers. Tefillah not the same thing as prayer. Just as shabbat requires the wisdom of making a הבדלה distinction between shabbat and chol at the beginning and end of the Day of Shabbat so too swearing a blessing oath requires the wisdom which discerns between making a blessing, which requires שם ומלכות, from saying a praise like Tehillem which lacks שם ומלכות.
What defines the abstract concept שם ומלכות ie “kingdom of Heaven” which the P’rushim asked JeZeus? JeZeus did not know this kabbalah. His answer not even in the same proverbial “Ball Park”! The Oral Torah mitza of Moshiach, gospels and new testament make the claims of JeZeus being “the messiah”, requires – just as do blessing – the wisdom which discerns the k’vanna of שם ומלכות.
JeZeus taught no Oral Torah common law precedents when he declared his “lord’s prayer”. His prayer make no reference to the dedication of Moshiach to the righteous pursuit of judicial justice which makes fair restitution of damages inflicted by the guilty upon the innocent among our conflicting Jewish people!!! The one repeated rebuke made concerning king David, he profaned his annointing as Moshiach by the prophet Shmuel in the matter of the dedication to pursue righteous judicial restoration of damages in the matter of Bat Sheva’s husband.
The false messiah JeZeus had absolutely no knowledge what so ever of the Oral Torah dedication of the k’vanna of the time oriented Av commandment of Moshiach! The very question the P’rushim challenged JeZeus as being a false messiah and false prophet.
Greek Text and Ambiguity, the phrase “ἐντὸς ὑμῶν” can mean either: “Within you” (internalized, spiritual) or “In your midst” (among you, i.e., the presence of the Messiah himself)!!!! Xtian commentators often prefer the first, reading it as an internal spiritual reign — supporting a Pauline model of personal salvation and supersession of Jewish law and statehood. However the false messiah JeZeus’s Lord’s Prayer testifies to the latter interpretation of the vague Greek language phrase.
Replacement theology (also called supersessionism) is the idea that the Church has replaced Israel as the true people of God. Luke 17:21 fits this mold in key ways. (1) It denies the oath brit which continually creates the Chosen Cohen people יש מאין through the service of dedicating tohor Av Torah time-oriented commandments! (2) The gospel counterfeit hogwash delegitimizes halachic Oral Torah פרדס logic as taught through the kabbalah of rabbi Akiva which the gospel counterfeit never once refers to!!! All the rabbis in both the Mishna and Gemara, all of them, base their opinions upon the kabbalah of rabbi Akiva interpretation of the heart and soul of the revelation of the Oral Torah at Horev, as taught through the logic system of פרדס inductive reasoning. The JeZeus Roman counterfeit had absolutely no knowledge what so ever of this fundamental kabbalah which defines the whole of Oral Torah as codified in the Mishna, Gemara, Talmud, Siddur, and Midrashim.
Later Christian traditions (from Augustine to Luther) cite this kind of passage to argue that Israel is no longer a physical nation, but now a metaphor for the Church or believing souls. This exactly duplicates, or to use the language of the gospels themselves … “fulfills” the prophesy of the Sin of the Golden Calf in all generations unto this very day!
Torah, Talmud, Siddur, and Midrashim establishes the Jewish identity, culture and customs to this very day. Defined through the revelation of the Oral Torah at Horev following the sin of the Golden Calf. Rabbi Akiva’s פרדס inductive reasoning logic system defines the k’vanna of the revelation of the Oral Torah which the church denies. JeZeus’s statement in Luke 17:21 dismantles that framework — it moves toward an ahistorical, non-legalist, inward “kingdom”. That shift aligns not just with Pauline theology, but with Gnostic and Hellenistic notions of salvation as inner knowledge or enlightenment rather than collective political redemption.
The foundational fracture between שם ומלכות sworn oath blessings, such as the blessing which Yitzak gave to Yaacov but did not give the non שם ומלכות praise given to Esau! Torah oral torah common law judicial jurisprudence – the gospel narrative counterfeit did not know. Torah jurisprudence rooted in brit-based chosen Cohen people pursuit of justice as the definition and essence of faith, the gospel/new testament replacement theology perverts to some spiritualized abstraction of Christian “kingdom” theology, which knows absolutely nothing of the k’vanna of שם ומלכות oath sworn brit alliances. This refutation equally applies to the koran, Moo-Ham-Madd did not know how the Torah defines the key term prophet just as the gospel counterfeit does not know how the Torah defines love – as defined through the Torah commandment of marriage known as קידושין. The essential legal-theological rupture that defines the gulf between Torah brit jurisprudence and the theological counterfeits presented by both the Christian New Testament and the Islamic Koran.
Yitzchak’s blessing to Yaakov was an oath-bound legal act. It therefore serves as THE fundamental בנין אב common law precedent by which the generations of Israel discern the distinction between making a Torah blessing commandment from saying a Tehillem prayer praise. JeZeus response utterly ignorant. Yitzak gave Esav a non-binding, non brit, non blessing/Tehillem to his second son who sold his Cohen first-born birthright to Yaacov! This structure underlies all Torah jurisprudence: no blessing (ברכה) without שם ומלכות, and no true faith (אמונה) without justice-rooted obligations. Faith equals fidelity to oath, not vague belief.
JeZeus and the gospel writers show no knowledge or respect for rabbi Akiva’s Oral Torah kabbalah of the revelation at Horev. Hence the church fathers deny to this day the revelation of the Oral Torah at Horev as expressed through the 13 tohor spirits of HaShem. The gospel book of john declares the word as God! The very definition of the Golden Calf wherein the ערב רב mixed multitude replacement theology sought to replace the Spirit Name revealed in the first Sinai commandment with the “word” אלהים — the definition of the replacement avoda zarah known as the sin of the Golden Calf.
The gospel narrative slander the Sanhedrin courts as corrupt and perverse. This negates the Torah concept of faith all together. An no whitewash can conceal this new testament perversion. This same mussar equally applies to Islam. Moo-Ham-Madd’s claim to prophecy lacks any brit-based legitimacy; does not transmit or interpret precedent-based halacha Oral Torah common law. Totally ignores T’NaCH Talmud common law. And equally likewise its substitute theology reduces prophecy to visionary utterance divorced from legal authority and nation-building. As with the gospel counterfeit, the Koran appropriates the term “prophet” while stripping it of its brit-legal definition and context. The gospel’s redefinition of love as universalized sentiment is as empty as its redefinition of kingdom and prophecy. Without brit, there is no legal structure to sustain love, justice, or nationhood. It is all mystified abstraction, which cannot create the chosen Cohen people through tohor time oriented commandments. The JeZeus abomination knowns nothing of what separates the Yatzir Ha’Tov tohor spirits from the Yatzir Ha’Ra tumah spirits.
Faith without oath-bound brit law is no faith at all, and any theological system — whether gospel or Koran — that dismisses or replaces the brit framework is not a continuation of revelation but a counterfeit rebellion against it. Yitzchak’s blessing to Yaakov is not merely narrative — it is precedent. It is the בנין אב, the archetype, of what constitutes a Torah-commanded blessing.
The blessing to Yaakov: A sworn, oath brit legal transfer of Cohen inheritance, complete with שם ומלכות implications (even if not verbally explicit, its legal force is absolute), just as kre’a shma, shemone esrei, the mourners kaddish, the blessing of the Cohem to the people of Israel – all visually lack שם ומלכות and therefore require the wisdom to know how to swear שם ומלכות within and through the spirit of the Yatzir Ha’Tov within the Heart! JeZeus makes no reference to this essential kabbalah taught by rabbi Yechuda the Head of the Great Sanhedrin!
A beracha requires brit. A brit requires oath. An oath requires שם ומלכות and k’vanna. Without this, you have mere praise. JeZeus shows no awareness of this distinction — a fatal flaw for anyone claiming prophetic authority within the brit tradition.
who cares about fantasy?
Who cares about your opinion.
Tefillah does NOT translate to prayer. Tefillah requires שם ומלכות, prayer – as found in saying Tehillem – does not fundamentally require שם ומלכות. What does this mean? מאי נפקא מינא in Aramaic Talmud. Answer: שם ומלכות meaning the dedication of a tohor middah revealed to Moshe at Horev לשמה by means of swearing a Torah oath through which the Avot cut a brit which continually creates from nothing the Chosen Cohen people children of the Avot. Hence: tefillah, as a tohor time oriented commandment calls upon the God of the Avot in the first blessing.
Praying Tehillem by stark contranst exist as a positive commandment which does not require k’vanna. Only tohor time oriented commandments which dedicate specified tohor middot through swearing a Torah oath, (Tefillah called Amidah b/c a person ideally stands before a Sefer Torah in the beit knesset.), qualify as comparable to the oaths wherein the Avot swore the brit oath which continually creates from nothing the chosen Cohen people. Hence the first blessing of the קריא שמע שחרית twice states תמיד מעשה בראשית.
Because the Book of בראשית introduces the Av mitzva of tohor time-oriented commandments which require prophetic mussar as its k’vanna. Prophetic mussar defines specified tohor middot first revealed to Moshe as the revelation of the Oral Torah at Sinai. Hence when the portion of Israel did their service in the Beit HaMikdash within the Beit Knesset they read the Creation story of the opening Book of בראשית which introduces the Av Torah commandments of tohor time-oriented commandments.
Consequently if a bnai brit does even minor Torah commandments such as shooing the mother bird off her brood of eggs or even rabbinic commandments like Shemone Esrei or lighting the Hanukkah lights or reading the Book of M’gillat Esther, the B’HaG introduced the chiddush that elevating mitzvot to Av tohor time-oriented commandments raises these rabbinic mitzvot to mitzvot from the Torah!
The distinction between Tefillah and the tachanun prayer
the Open Siddur Project ✍ פְּרוֺיֶקְט הַסִּדּוּר הַפָּתוּחַ
Aharon N. Varady (transcription)·opensiddur.org·
Concluding Prayer for Hallel in the Home Service for the Festival of Passover, by Rabbi J. Leonard Levy (1896)
This is a concluding prayer in the Hallel service at the Passover seder by Rabbi J. Leonard Levy to his Haggadah or Home Service for the Festival of Passover (1896) pp. 32-34. The prayer does not appear in subsequent editions. The prayer threads the needle between the particularly Jewish communal focus of Passover and the…
Moshe Kerr: What separates תפילה from תחנון? A blessing requires שם ומלכות. Shemone Esrei does not contain שם ומלכות. Yet it functions as the definition of a blessing. As does kadesh, which also lacks שם ומלכות. For that matter so does ברכת כהנים וגם כן קריא שמע. The k’vanna of חנון has nothing to do with the formal prayer written in the Siddur. Why? Because all these “mitzvot” qualify as tohor time oriented commandments which require k’vanna. What’s the k’vanna of תחנון through which it defines תפילה?
Word translations amount to tits on a boar hog when the new born piglets are ravenous and the sow died after giving birth! The 5th middah of the revelation of the Oral Torah at Horev – חנון, serves as the functioning root שרש of the term תחנון תפילה. The tohor time-oriented commandment of תפילה learns from the additional metaphor of תחנון. Consider the Order of the Shemone Esrei blessings … 3 + 13 + 3 blessings. 6 Yom Tov and 13 tohor middot revealed to Moshe, 40 days after the ערב רב Israelites – Jews assimilated and intermarried with Egyptians, no different from the kapo Jewish women who slept with Nazis. This ערב רב, according to the Torah – as expressed in the memory to war against Amalek/antisemitism – they lacked fear of אלהים. This same ערב רב referred to their Golden Calf substitute theology by the name אלהים. This tie-in explains the k’vanna of the term “fear of heaven”.
The ערב רב Jews lacked “fear of Heaven”, and therefore their avoda zarah profaned the 2nd Sinai commandment. Hence when Jews assimilate and intermarry with Goyim who do not accept the revelation of the Torah at Sinai (neither the Xtian Bible nor Muslim Koran ever once brings the שם השם first revealed in the 1st Sinai commandment – the greatest commandment of the entire Torah revelation at Sinai and Horev! Do Jews serve to obey the Torah revelation לשמה או לא לשמה? Observance of all the Torah commandments and Talmudic halachot hangs on this simple question.
Therefore תפילת תחנון interprets the k’vanna of תפילה, through the concept that a person stands before a Sefer Torah and dedicated specific and defined tohor middot which breath life into the hearts of the Yatrir HaTov of the chosen Cohen oath brit people. The verb תפילה most essentially entails the k’vanna of swearing a Torah oath. What Torah oath? The dedication, think korban, of some specified tohor middot…. Hence the concept of תפילת תחנון.
??????
Yes Opher … we know … you’re a moron.
A compliment come from you Moshe!
Liberal Kapo Jews. This stinking ערב רב assimilated and intermarried Jews who promote the hatred of Amalek – antisemitism. They simply have no fear of Heaven. The Torah described the original ערב רב that came out of Egypt as אין להם יראת אלהים.
Tikun Olam תיקון עולם إصلاح العالم
Richard Silverstein·www.richardsilverstein.com
Trump’s Iran Charade
In the aftermath of the US attack on Iran’s nuclear plants, a debate rages about the extent of the post Trump’s Iran Charade appeared first on Tikun Olam תיקון עולם إصلاح العالم
The Oct7th War which spread to a war against Lebanon, Syria, and Iran has radically changed the balance of power in the Middle East. The UN has completely discredited its objectivity with the ICC/ICJ attempts to declare Bibi a war-criminal. You drink this blood libel slander like Catholics drink their blood and body of Christ then go out and make a Easter pogrom against Jews based upon some blood libel slander!
Both England and France have broken off diplomatic relations with Israel, prior to the 12 Day War with Iran! Hence neither power has any influence in the Middle East negotiated peace process ie. the Coming Abraham expanded accords which will most likely see a majority of Arab countries developing diplomatic relations with Israel. If a majority of Arab nations recognize the Jewish state, then and only then will Israel join the Middle East voting block of Nations within the UN. A totally unprecedented reality since Israel won its two Wars of national independence back in 1948 and again in 1967.
The latter Independence War, recall that Naser swore to throw the Jews into the Sea and correct the Nakba disgrace where 5 Arab Armies failed to throw the Jews into the Sea and complete the Nazi Shoah of the Jewish people! To date, except for Camp David and Abraham Accord Arab nations which currently have diplomatic relations with Israel, post the Israeli victory of 1967, all Arab countries reacted through the Khartoum Conference declaration of 3 No’s. No Peace with Israel. No Recognition of Israel. No Negotiations with Israel.
Arab countries which reject the Jewish state of Israel refer it as “the Zionist Entity”. General Assembly UN Resolution 3379 declared Zionism is Racism! Apparently your revisionist History over-looked these minor FACTS. All Arab countries absolutely reject the 1917 Balfour Declaration wherein Britain recognized Jewish equal rights to achieve self determination in the Middle East. The League of Nations “Palestine Mandate” awarded to victorious WWI Britain in 1922, based this Mandate upon the Balfour Declaration. Hence b/c Arabs rejected Jewish equal rights to achieve self-determination in the Middle East no Arab would ever refer to himself as a Palestinian.
Not till 1964, with the State of Israel as a 16 year old country did Egyptian born Yasser Arafat embrace the political opportunism and call his terrorist movement the Palestine Liberation Organization – PLO. That PLO Charter did not condemn Jordanian “occupation” of the Jordan declared “West Bank”. Nor did it condemn the Egyptian “occupation” of Gaza! Only ’48 Israel did the PLO Charter condemn and abhor!!!!
_____________________________________________
A 6 part Mishnaic mussar of this paper. Avodah Zarah in Our Generation: The Crisis of Jews Who Side With Amalek. In every generation, Amalek takes new forms. Today, it is no different. But what is shocking is not only the hatred of our enemies—it is the collaboration of Jews, raised within Torah civilization or its memory, who now partner with those seeking to dismantle the Jewish state.
When Jewish voices shout “From the River to the Sea,” they are not engaged in protest—they are echoing the genocidal goals of Hamas. When they equate Israel’s defense against a massacre to genocide, they join in blood libel, no different in kind from the medieval slanders that triggered Easter pogroms. When they ally with UN declarations and ICC/ICJ indictments meant to strip Jews of the right to self-defense, they violate the first commandment of Jewish history: “Never again shall Jewish blood be cheap.”
1. Sovereignty vs. Subjugation: Jews Ruling vs. Jews Ruled: A fundamental distinction separates Jews living as a sovereign nation in their own land versus Jews existing as a minority under non-Jewish rule (galut). Assimilated & intermarried Jews in the West, who function within dominant non-Jewish cultures, have lost connection with Jewish national identity and Torah sovereignty, resembling the biblical Erev Rav—those lacking fear of Heaven and loyalty to the Jewish nation.
2. Double Standards in Territorial Legitimacy: Prussia vs. Samaria & Gaza: The hypocrisy of the international community – emphasized. While the post-WWII redrawing of European borders—such as Poland and Russia’s annexation of Prussia—is accepted without condemnation, Israel is uniquely targeted for reasserting sovereignty over Samaria and Gaza after 1967. UN Resolutions 242 and 338 are cited as politically biased tools used to delegitimize Israel’s historical and military rights.
3. Western Imperialism and Regional Domination: Suez to Iran. The 1956 Suez Crisis serves as evidence of continued British and French imperial ambitions, cloaked in Cold War geopolitics and economic control (specifically over the Suez Canal). This is paralleled with U.S./British involvement in Iran—removing Mossadegh and reinstalling the Shah to prevent the nationalization of oil. The 1979 Iranian Revolution is framed as a reaction to this imperialism. Similarly, prior to the “12 Day War,” the UK and France withdrew diplomatic ties with Israel in protest of their exclusion from influencing a ceasefire in Gaza.
4. Rejection of the 242/338 Two-State Paradigm by the Abraham Accords. The Abraham Accords are seen as a major geopolitical shift, fundamentally rejecting the British- and French-backed vision of peace based on dividing Israel into two hostile entities—akin to India-Pakistan or North-South Korea. The Accords envision peace without territorial partition, and with increasing normalization between Israel and Arab states, signal the failure of the old colonial-era frameworks.
5. UN Bias and Historical Arab Rejectionism of the Balfour Declaration wherein a major Great Power recognized Jewish equal rights to achieve self-determination in the Middle East. The UN based its 1922 Palestinian Mandate upon the Balfour Treaty. The Khartoum Conference (1967) “Three No’s” serves as proof of Arab states’ refusal to accept Israel’s equal rights to self-determination. The UN, particularly via General Assembly Resolution 3379 (“Zionism is racism”), has been complicit in reinforcing this Arab rejectionism of Jewish equal rights to achieve self-determination. Meanwhile, the ICC and ICJ today continue the Zionism is Racism pattern, under the guise of international law, falsely accusing Israeli leaders of war crimes while ignoring the Oct7th pogrom and declaring the current conflict pre-dates Oct7th. This whitewashes the Oct7th surprise attack, comparable to the Pearl Harbor attack on Dec7th 1941.
6. The Manufactured Identity of “Palestinians” and PLO Opportunism. The identity of “Palestinians”, a modern invention, emerging only in 1964 with the formation of the PLO under Egyptian-born Yasser Arafat. The original PLO Charter made no objection to Jordanian control of the West Bank or Egyptian rule in Gaza, focusing only on dismantling Israel. This opportunistic narrative is framed as a political weapon rather than a legitimate national movement.
Comprehensive
Here’s a re-written clarification.
Liberal Kapo Jews. This stinking ערב רב assimilated and intermarried Jews who promote the hatred of Amalek – antisemitism. They simply have no fear of Heaven. The Torah described the original ערב רב that came out of Egypt as אין להם יראת אלהים. Sinat chinam equals spiritual Amalek.
Tikun Olam תיקון עולם إصلاح العالم
Richard Silverstein·www.richardsilverstein.com
Trump’s Iran Charade
In the aftermath of the US attack on Iran’s nuclear plants, a debate rages about the extent of the post Trump’s Iran Charade appeared first on Tikun Olam תיקון עולם إصلاح العالم
The Oct7th War which spread to a war against Lebanon, Syria, and Iran has radically changed the balance of power in the Middle East. The UN has completely discredited its objectivity with the ICC/ICJ attempts to declare Bibi a war-criminal. You drink this blood libel slander like Catholics drink their blood and body of Christ then go out and make a Easter pogrom against Jews based upon some blood libel slander!
Both England and France have broken off diplomatic relations with Israel, prior to the 12 Day War with Iran! Hence neither power has any influence in the Middle East negotiated peace process ie. the Coming Abraham expanded accords which will most likely see a majority of Arab countries developing diplomatic relations with Israel. If a majority of Arab nations recognize the Jewish state, then and only then will Israel join the Middle East voting block of Nations within the UN. A totally unprecedented reality since Israel won its two Wars of national independence back in 1948 and again in 1967.
The latter Independence War, recall that Naser swore to throw the Jews into the Sea and correct the Nakba disgrace where 5 Arab Armies failed to throw the Jews into the Sea and complete the Nazi Shoah of the Jewish people! To date, except for Camp David and Abraham Accord Arab nations which currently have diplomatic relations with Israel, post the Israeli victory of 1967, all Arab countries reacted through the Khartoum Conference declaration of 3 No’s. No Peace with Israel. No Recognition of Israel. No Negotiations with Israel.
Arab countries which reject the Jewish state of Israel refer it as “the Zionist Entity”. General Assembly UN Resolution 3379 declared Zionism is Racism! Apparently your revisionist History over-looked these minor FACTS. All Arab countries absolutely reject the 1917 Balfour Declaration wherein Britain recognized Jewish equal rights to achieve self determination in the Middle East. The League of Nations “Palestine Mandate” awarded to victorious WWI Britain in 1922, based this Mandate upon the Balfour Declaration. Hence b/c Arabs rejected Jewish equal rights to achieve self-determination in the Middle East no Arab would ever refer to himself as a Palestinian.
Not till 1964, with the State of Israel as a 16 year old country did Egyptian born Yasser Arafat embrace the political opportunism and call his terrorist movement the Palestine Liberation Organization – PLO. That PLO Charter did not condemn Jordanian “occupation” of the Jordan declared “West Bank”. Nor did it condemn the Egyptian “occupation” of Gaza! Only ’48 Israel did the PLO Charter condemn and abhor!!!!
_____________________________________________
A 6 part Mishnaic mussar of this paper. Avodah Zarah in Our Generation: The Crisis of Jews Who Side With Amalek. In every generation, Amalek takes new forms. Today, it is no different. But what is shocking is not only the hatred of our enemies—it is the collaboration of Jews, raised within Torah civilization or its memory, who now partner with those seeking to dismantle the Jewish state.
When Jewish voices shout “From the River to the Sea,” they are not engaged in protest—they are echoing the genocidal goals of Hamas. When they equate Israel’s defense against a massacre to genocide, they join in blood libel, no different in kind from the medieval slanders that triggered Easter pogroms. When they ally with UN declarations and ICC/ICJ indictments meant to strip Jews of the right to self-defense, they violate the first commandment of Jewish history: “Never again shall Jewish blood be cheap.”
1. Sovereignty vs. Subjugation: Jews Ruling vs. Jews Ruled: A fundamental distinction separates Jews living as a sovereign nation in their own land versus Jews existing as a minority under non-Jewish rule (galut). Assimilated & intermarried Jews in the West, who function within dominant non-Jewish cultures, have lost connection with Jewish national identity and Torah sovereignty, resembling the biblical Erev Rav—those lacking fear of Heaven and loyalty to the Jewish nation.
2. Double Standards in Territorial Legitimacy: Prussia vs. Samaria & Gaza: The hypocrisy of the international community – emphasized. While the post-WWII redrawing of European borders—such as Poland and Russia’s annexation of Prussia—is accepted without condemnation, Israel is uniquely targeted for reasserting sovereignty over Samaria and Gaza after 1967. UN Resolutions 242 and 338 are cited as politically biased tools used to delegitimize Israel’s historical and military rights.
3. Western Imperialism and Regional Domination: Suez to Iran. The 1956 Suez Crisis serves as evidence of continued British and French imperial ambitions, cloaked in Cold War geopolitics and economic control (specifically over the Suez Canal). This is paralleled with U.S./British involvement in Iran—removing Mossadegh and reinstalling the Shah to prevent the nationalization of oil. The 1979 Iranian Revolution is framed as a reaction to this imperialism. Similarly, prior to the “12 Day War,” the UK and France withdrew diplomatic ties with Israel in protest of their exclusion from influencing a ceasefire in Gaza.
4. Rejection of the 242/338 Two-State Paradigm by the Abraham Accords. The Abraham Accords are seen as a major geopolitical shift, fundamentally rejecting the British- and French-backed vision of peace based on dividing Israel into two hostile entities—akin to India-Pakistan or North-South Korea. The Accords envision peace without territorial partition, and with increasing normalization between Israel and Arab states, signal the failure of the old colonial-era frameworks.
5. UN Bias and Historical Arab Rejectionism of the Balfour Declaration wherein a major Great Power recognized Jewish equal rights to achieve self-determination in the Middle East. The UN based its 1922 Palestinian Mandate upon the Balfour Treaty. The Khartoum Conference (1967) “Three No’s” serves as proof of Arab states’ refusal to accept Israel’s equal rights to self-determination. The UN, particularly via General Assembly Resolution 3379 (“Zionism is racism”), has been complicit in reinforcing this Arab rejectionism of Jewish equal rights to achieve self-determination. Meanwhile, the ICC and ICJ today continue the Zionism is Racism pattern, under the guise of international law, falsely accusing Israeli leaders of war crimes while ignoring the Oct7th pogrom and declaring the current conflict pre-dates Oct7th. This whitewashes the Oct7th surprise attack, comparable to the Pearl Harbor attack on Dec7th 1941.
6. The Manufactured Identity of “Palestinians” and PLO Opportunism. The identity of “Palestinians”, a modern invention, emerging only in 1964 with the formation of the PLO under Egyptian-born Yasser Arafat. The original PLO Charter made no objection to Jordanian control of the West Bank or Egyptian rule in Gaza, focusing only on dismantling Israel. This opportunistic narrative is framed as a political weapon rather than a legitimate national movement.
___________________________________
The Talmud (Yoma 9b) states:
מקדש שני שהיו עוסקים בתורה ובמצות וגמילות חסדים, מפני מה חרב? מפני שהיתה בו שנאת חנם. Then, the Midrash in Eikha Rabbah and various aggadot go further to compare sinat chinam with the worst transgressions—including idolatry, sexual immorality, and murder—suggesting that internal Jewish hatred is as destructive as idol worship.
G’lut Jews have lost the wisdom to keep and obey the Torah לשמה. Assimilated and intermarried Jews living under foreign alien cultures and customs have abandoned the T’NaCH, Talmud, Midrashim, and Siddur as the foundation which shapes and forms all Torah cultures and customs. As an ערב רב they cling to alien cultures and customs by which they form and shape their identities and values. These foreign cultures and customs which they embrace have become the Gods which they worship.
מידה כנגד מידה a core Torah principle, and that slogans like “From the river to the sea”—when chanted by Jews—do immense damage. Jews who equate the Gaza war with the Shoah genocide equals to the abhorrence to blood libel slanders which produced annual pogroms prior to Easter across Europe. Liberal Jews disgraceful alliance with South African declarations of genocide in Gaza and Apartheid a flat out public chilul Hashem. Such Jews have no portion in the world to Come. These Jews have broken faith with the brit Cohen people, just like as did the Erev Rav which aroused Amalek antisemites throughout the generations. The blood of hundreds of generations of Jews slaughtered cries out and denounces these stinking ערב רב Jews.
When Jews chant “From the River to the Sea,” they are not merely protesting policy—they are aligning themselves with those who dream of Israel’s destruction. This is not political dissent. It is covenantal treason. Like the Erev Rav, they emerge at times of national crisis to confuse the people, distort Torah, and drain morale. Their slogans, shouted from exile and college campuses, do more than harm Israel’s name abroad—they erode our internal unity and desecrate the mission entrusted to Israel at Sinai. These Jews have not merely lost political direction—they have forfeited spiritual clarity. They replace Torah with the gods of globalism, intersectionality, and postmodern guilt. The Torah calls this avodah zarah—not in metaphor, but in law.
The Torah commands the total destruction of Amalek—without mercy, without compromise. This commandment appears in multiple places. Devarim 25:17–19: “You shall blot out the memory of Amalek from under heaven. Do not forget.”
Shemot 17:16: “Hashem will have war with Amalek from generation to generation.”
Shmuel I 15: Shmuel commands Shaul to annihilate Amalek totally, down to every man, woman, child, and animal. When Shaul shows mercy, he is rejected as king.
This as a Torah commandment targets Amalek’s existential war against Hashem and against the Jewish people. Amalek is not simply an enemy—it is a theological and civilizational antithesis to Torah, a force of evil that seeks to destroy the very brit between Hashem and Israel.
The statute law perversion of Hilchot Melachim 5:5 flat out wrong. The 7 laws of bnai noach apply strictly and only to gere toshav temporary residents living within the borders of Judea. Once those Goyim returned to their homelands the 7 laws no longer applied to them. The purpose of keeping those 7 laws: Unlike the refugee Na’Cree stranger who had no judicial rights to fair compensation of damages inflicted. Gere Toshav enjoyed the legal right to sue an Israel for damages and receive fair compensation. Not so the Canaani refugees. An Israel had no legal obligation to compensate them for damages they suffered from an Israel. The purpose of judicial justice – to restore Trust between bnai brit who inflict damages upon one another. The NaCree Canaani refugees never ever trusted during their entire temporary residence within the borders of Judea.
Today we can easily identify Amalek with absolute certainty because assimilation and intermarriage defines avoda zarah and Amalek promotes the worship of avoda zarah. The RambaN’s (Devarim 25) commentary applies today because the Torah defines faith as the pursuit of righteous judicial justice within the borders of the Constitutional 12 Tribe Republic. Sanhedrin 98a: “Moshiach ben David will not come until all judges are restored as of old.” Amalek is not a foreign invader, but a spiritual-political corruption that arises from within, where Torah is abandoned, brit is dissolved, and Jewish trust is betrayed. The king David model dedicates the mitzva of Moshiach upon justice based upon the פרט of the lack of justice served to the baal of Bat Sheva.
The ערב רב who left Egypt – Jews. Amalek attacked these Jews wherein they embraced the ways of Amalek ie assimilation and intermarriage. Amalek by definition: a nation that attacked Israel at its weakest from behind. From behind refers to Jews who have no fear of God.
Sinat chinam and betrayal while similar to precedent cases of mumar, tinok she’nishba, moser, and min, clearly the added blessing within the Shemone Esrei by Shmuel Ha’Katan condemns this ערב רב Amalek internal Jewish abomination no different than the Ben Sorer u’Moreh.
The term “Amalek”, applied to Jews perceived as betraying their people, rather than to alien Goyim people/strangers. This internal betrayal – viewed as particularly egregious because it comes from within the community, undermining the collective identity and mission of the Jewish people. The comparison to figures like Benedict Arnold highlights the seriousness of perceived betrayal during critical moments in Jewish history, such as the fight for independence and survival against external threats. Liberal Reform Jewish movements or individuals, who align themselves with foreign enemies who oppose Israel or Jewish sovereignty, their tuma actions constitute as most base betrayal, meaning Amalek.
Liberal Reform Judaism theology and Jewish political groups or individuals who embrace this Av tuma avoda zarah; who align themselves with anti-Israel sentiments or actions contribute to a form of betrayal which defines the Torah commandment to obliterate Amalek. The seriousness of internal divisions within the Jewish community and the implications of those divisions for Jewish identity and solidarity herein defines the k’vanna of remembering the Torah obligation to utterly obliterate Amalek without showing the slightest regard for mercy.
Hence its the precise mitzvot of killing the rebellious son or the mitzva of utterly obliterating the memory of Amalek betrayal among our people, these key Torah precedents serve to define the k’vanna of רחום revealed to Moshe at Horev 40 days after the sin of the Golden Calf.
Another precedent, the destruction of Korach and his children. The Torah commands: The sons does not die for the sins of his father. Yet the sons of Korach all died together with their father! The middah of רחום vetoes the negative Torah commandment. The revelation of Oral Torah tohor middot at Horev prioritizes the k’vanna of tohor middot dedicated to HaShem לשמה. Either when dedicating a korban on the altar or doing halachic mitzvot from the Talmud.
Regardless – doing time oriented tohor Av commandments raises toldot commandments and halachic mitzvot to primary Torah commandments which require prophetic mussar middot dedications לשמה as their k’vanna. Therefore the dedication of tohor middot have a veto power over doing secondary commandments which do not require k’vanna; such as the negative commandment not to put the son to death for the sins of the father. Yet in the case of Korach, the sons – put to death together with their father. Herein defines the k’vanna of רחום; the scape-goat, thrown off a cliff alive on Yom Kippur to serves as a reverse רחום Torah tohor middah.
Shame it’s all tosh!
Shame your a brainless moron.
Liberal kapo Jews utterly abhorred by Israelis. Why? The tone presented in this text below—despite its sharp rebuke and contempt for diaspora Liberal Judaism—from my perspective, represents an interpretation of tohor middat haRachamim (pure attribute of compassion).
“Open rebuke simply better than hidden love.” – Mishlei 27:5 The tone seeks only a cactus like external surface prick, in order to frame the spiritual interior meat of רחום; the rejection of sentimentalism, and the prioritization of a deep commitment to the collective soul of Am Yisrael, the chosen Cohen People. An impassion call for t’shuva. A warning that assimilation and intermarriage, this Av tuma avoda zarah, it opens our People to Torah curses, like the plagues which afflicted Par’o.
This tochacha/rebuke likewise calls upon the tohor midda of חנון, the כלל to the dedication of defined tohor middot. Rather than limit itself to the דיוק פרט of רחום. Which ironically embraces the philosophy of Rambam, who taught in his Moreh, that the more a Man can say that which a subject “is not”, the greater clarity that person gains to understand the positive aspects of an abstract undefinable idea.
“Tikkun Olam”, serves as a popular concept primarily associated with Reform Judaism and lacks influence in Israel. In the U.S. and other diaspora communities, Reform Judaism’s embrace of tikkun olam has become a cornerstone—seen through philanthropic work, social justice activism, and universalist values. This highlights the divide between Israelis and G’lut Jewry. David Friedman’s 2016 comment calling J Street members “far worse than kapos,” implies that liberal Jews are actively betraying their people
Many Israelis see Liberal Judaism as alien to Israeli reality, where Jewish identity and community structures provide intrinsic meaning (e.g., one commenter said Reform Judaism is “unnecessary in Israel” because secular Jewish life already satisfies that need) . Turning “tikkun olam” into a universalist, politically progressive doctrine, directly compares to the Xtian and Muslim Monotheism Universal God avoda zarah violation of the 2nd Sinai commandment.
American Reform leaders have repeatedly said that diaspora Jews must oppose “misguided” Israeli policies, including regarding ultra‑Orthodox influence and Arab‑Israeli democracy. They totally ignore the vision of political zionism which strives to achieve Jewish self-determination within the borders of a Jewish Middle East country. PM Sharon permitted Palestinian self-determination and free elections in 2005. He risks Jewish civil war to give Arabs a stake in the self-determination action.
Jews abroad who joined with Arab anti-Israel propaganda, protests, and violence post Oct7th have undermined Israel’s sovereignty and assisted the UN and ICC/ICJ efforts to dismantle the Jewish state or at the least impose a foreign cease-fire wherein Israel surrendered to the Gaza surprise attack of Oct 7th. The Israeli Chief Rabbinate maintains that Reform Judaism is “uprooting Judaism” and refuses to recognize its conversions, marriages, burials. Official discrimination and cultural marginalization casts g’lut assimilated Jewry unto the dhimmi gutter. Not because Israelis hate foreign Jewish devils. But because alien Jews living in exile suffer from a cultural gulf that far exceeds the span of the Atlantic Ocean.
Given Israel’s ongoing security crises and existential threats, public dissent by diaspora Jews—like U.S. Reform leaders urging “opposition to misguided policies”—perceived as political interference meant to weaken Israeli resolve . For many Israelis, it feels like these outsiders place themselves above or even undermining Israel’s sovereignty.
Zionist ideology historically devalued diaspora life—seeing true Jewish life as rooted in Israel, not scattered and assimilated abroad. Modern national‑Zionist Israelis often view diaspora liberalism as a cultural betrayal, a manifestation of exile that nationalist Zionism sought to overcome. Israelis live in a constant state of preparedness due to mandatory service, violence, and geopolitical precariousness. Diaspora Jews, especially in Western countries, often experience minority life in pluralistic democracies, focused on rights, social justice, and integration. When diaspora criticisms mirror Western progressive rhetoric, many Israelis see this as tone-deaf at best, and existential threat at worst.
Times of Israel reported Ambassador Friedman calling J Street members “far worse than kapos” for supporting a two-state solution—a sign he views their dissent as voluntary betrayal, darker than coerced collaboration. Kapo diaspora liberals have abandoned Israel’s endangered community during its darkest hours. This psychological echo of the Holocaust-era betrayal wherein g’lut Jews choose Western moral comfort over solidarity with a state under siege, causes Israelis to hold these kapo Jews in complete and utter contempt. Jews in foreign countries calling Israel a Nazi state, they expect that Israelis would not respond with utter revulsion?!
The gulf that separates two completely different cultures and peoples band-aids like Kotel arrangements, communal dialogues and religious inclusion amount to tits on a boar hog. G’lut Jews simply not part of the Israeli chosen Cohen people.
The Talmud functions as both a guide & model to establish legal systems within the Jewish state. G’lut Jewish racist prejudice limits the Talmud strictly and only as an archaic religion of out-dated and out-classed Orthodox fundamentalism. The Liberal “interpretation” of ancient texts which that alien liberal religion holds both T’NaCH and Talmud in disdain and contempt, emphasizes the cultural gap which separates Jews from non-Jewish Jews. Their gross declaratin: ‘Berlin as their Jerusalem’, that absolute abomination never forgotten nor forgiven; it perhaps best qualifies as Liberal Judaism’s distorted interpretation of Chesed. But such “chesed” qualifies merely as a tuma treif bird; an idea that does not fly with Israelis.
The term “kapo”, historically, a loaded term that refers to Jewish prisoners appointed by Nazis to oversee other Jewish prisoners in concentration camps. Such as removing the gold fillings of Jews slaughtered in the gas chambers. Using this term as a description of liberal Jews, suggests a deep-seated anger and repulsive reaction towards screaming liberal Jews shouting “Not in our Name”, following the Oct 7th abomination.
This utter detestation and complete revulsion of g’lut Jewry, it reflects a broader sentiment among many Israelis. We feel that liberal Jewish critiques of Israel, they joins hands with our enemies, and seek to undermine our country’s security and legitimacy. This makes Liberal g’lut Jews no different than Arab bomb makers. A huge and significant cultural and ideological divide, much larger than the Atlantic ocean separates Israelis and diaspora Jews like oil and water. Particularly, those Jews who identify with Liberal or Reform movements. This cultural divide stems from differing experiences, values, and interpretations of Jewish identity and responsibility. Reform Jewish mothers never have to bury their children after putting them on a school bus.
The Talmud, serves together with the T’NaCH and Siddur – as foundational texts which establish the working model for judicial common-law Federal courtrooms within the Israeli Republic. Israelis perceive the T’NaCH, aggadah, and midrashim as the basis to derive and interpret the ethical prophetic mussar frameworks foundations of our Republic/nation-state of Israel.
This fundamental difference of priority and emphasis, it underscores the huge gulf which divides and separates Israeli from g’lut Jewry. The latter tuma-Jews choose and prefer to live in foreign lands. Liberal Reform tuma-Jews prioritize modern interpretations and social justice concerns and practices expressed through alien Goyim cultures and customs. Their attempts to stamp those alien cultures and customs upon tohor-Israelis, directly compares to the Hanukkah Civil War where the corrupt tuma-Tzeddukim likewise attempted to turn Jerusalem into a Greek Polis and cause our people to forget the kabbalah of rabbi Akiva 4 part inductive reasoning Oral Torah Jewish genius … replaced by foreign ancient Greek philosophy, like Aristotle’s 3 part deductive logic/syllogism model.
Liberal Reform tuma-Judaism slandered both the T’NaCH and Talmud and referred to both as archaic. Therefore their attempt to impose their corrupt, alien ethical model-monopoly; their repeated attempts to dictate, as if liberal tuma-Jews compare to the Av-tuma UN, how foreign tuma-Jews in distant lands, assimilated cultures, and inter-married customs of avoda zarah; their repeated attempts to dictate how to interpret and understand, these not just these basic and fundamental Primary source Jewish texts — that serve to shape and form Jewish culture and custom as a unique chosen Cohen people.
The arrogance of their presumption seeks to forcibly impose a One State Arab-Jewish democracy upon Zionism as the best ideal! Liberal Jews abhorred Zionism during the closing window of opportunity in the 1920s before Hitler. The British White Paper and FDR’s closure of US ports to Jews sealed the fate of Shoah Jewry in Europe.
Liberal Judaism interpretations apply strictly and only to tuma-g’lut Jews. Their assimilated and intermarried debauchery, merits nothing but utter contempt within the borders of the “Jewish Torah Constitutional Republic”, which a new generation of political Zionist Israelis, seeks to achieve Jewish self-determination within the borders of Israel – and actualize the k’vanna of the Balfour Declaration which launched political Zionism in 1917.
Chaim Weizmann publicly said in 1906: “Any deflection from Palestine was—well, a form of idolatry.” He emphasized that only by building on the ground in Palestine could a Jewish homeland be born—and that Jews elsewhere must support colonization and immigration. The phrase “Jews of the world, where are you?” fits the tone of Weizmann’s broader rhetorical stance—an urgent summons to global Jewry to move beyond political promises and take tangible, on-the-ground action.
Weizmann repeatedly challenged Jews in the diaspora to support immigration and nation-building in Palestine—telling Balfour, “We had Jerusalem when London was a marsh,” and warning of waves of Jewish refugees seeking refuge.
Av tuma Rabbi Stephen S. Wise pressured President Franklin D. Roosevelt to maintain strict U.S. immigration quotas and opposed changing the laws to admit more Jewish refugees. Wise through the public voice of the American Jewish Congress, the World Jewish Congress, supported Roosevelt. He cowardly refused to publicly challenge FDR’s White Paper policy. Wise emphasized the need to fight antisemitism in America rather than offer American shores as a safety life-line to European Jewry. In 1938, under Wise’s influence, Jewish institutions decided not to back legislation that would have loosened immigration laws to allow more Jewish refugees into the U.S.—explicitly agreeing “no Jewish organization would… sponsor a bill which would… alter the immigration laws”.
Between 1933–1945, only a fraction of the allowed immigration quota for German and Axis countries was utilized. Estimates suggest nearly 200,000 quota spots remained unused—lives that could have been saved. Jewish Liberal Reform leaders like Wise directly compare to Pope Pius XII – both Av tuma corruption chose “quiet diplomacy” and maintaining alignment with the Roosevelt administration over public advocacy for Holocaust refugees.
Historians like Rafael Medoff emphasize that Wise’s cautious approach—supported by his close relationship with FDR—slowed or blocked rescue efforts during crucial years of the Holocaust. Wise also prioritized Zionist aims in Palestine, despite the 1939 British White Paper! He claimed to favor immigration only to Palestine, but Reform American Jews never made aliyah to Israel in large numbers. He discouraged Jewish groups from lobbying Congress or mounting public pressure to open U.S. borders to Jewish refugees.
Av tuma Abraham Geiger, often called the “father of Reform Judaism”—openly declared “Berlin is our Jerusalem”. This phrase expressed a sweeping theological and cultural perversion. It reflects a sentiment that debased liberal Jews prioritized foreign cultural or secular identities. Reform Judaism rejected the traditional Jewish longing for a return to Zion. Instead, it embraced the idea of Jewish integration into its host nation—here, Germany. Geiger’s declaration made clear that Germany was their spiritual and communal center, not Palestine. Reform Judaism worships the American and French revolutions as their Gods. This religion of avoda zarah established citizens rights rather than serfs as their ‘human rights’ Nicene Creed. Reform congregations were called “Temples”; services conducted in German; prayers toward Jerusalem omitted from their gutted prayer-books. As one Reform leader explained, their allegiance lay primarily with their birth nation, not an ancient homeland.
But Israel does not compare to the feudal Confederate South, with its agricultural based economy; dependent upon slave labor! Jews living abroad, their opinions have parity with Americans living in Russia! Rebuke accusations of inauthenticity or a lack of commitment to Jewish heritage immediately come to mind whenever Liberal Jews denounce Israel across University campuses across the US and Europe.
Liberal Jews abhor the sealing of the T’NaCH, Talmud, Siddur and Midrashim. These ignorant amaratzim preach a Xtianized morality from their assimilated pulpits and soap-boxes. Their pie in the sky Top-down moralism of the Arab-Israeli conflict utterly ignores and discounts the impact of terrorism on Israeli perceptions and responses. The possibility that the Talmud serves as the interpretive lens for understanding the Mishnah, reinforcing the importance of traditional common law פרדס scholarship, used to shape modern Jewish common-law and ethics – completely and totally alien to this liberal tuma-Jewish minority populations in foreign countries.
Obozo the incompetant clown, responsible for UN imperialism Resolution 2334 … Former President shoe shine boy has publicly condemned President Trump’s recent airstrikes on Iranian nuclear sites, calling the military action “reckless” and “dangerous.” In a statement released shortly after the strikes, Obama expressed concern over the potential for escalating conflict in the region and criticized Trump’s approach to foreign policy. Hilbillery Clinton the incompetent likewise, in goose-step with Obozo the clown has condemned President Trump’s decision to bomb Iranian nuclear sites, labeling the military action as “irresponsible” and “dangerous.” In her statement, Clinton expressed deep concern over the potential for escalating tensions and the risk of a broader conflict in the Middle East.
Monkey See Monkey Do former Vice President loser Kamala Harris: has condemned President Trump’s decision to bomb Iranian nuclear sites, calling the military action “irresponsible” and “dangerous.” Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, along with Representatives Jerry Nadler, Adam Schiff, and Maxine Waters, has condemned President Trump’s decision to bomb Iranian nuclear facilities. Their statements reflect a unified stance among prominent Democratic leaders against the military action, emphasizing concerns about the potential for escalating conflict and the need for diplomatic solutions.
The Democratic Party is experiencing a notable split over President Trump’s recent bombing of Iranian nuclear sites, reflecting differing views on foreign policy and military intervention. Many establishment Democrats, including prominent leaders like Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer, are advocating for a diplomatic approach to Iran. They criticize Trump’s military action as reckless and counterproductive. Some moderate Democrats are more divided, with some expressing support for a strong stance against Iran while others share concerns about the potential for escalation. This group is often caught between the party’s progressive base and the more traditional foreign policy views of the establishment. The split within the Democratic Party over Trump’s bombing of Iranian nuclear sites highlights the broader debate about the U.S. role in international conflicts and the balance between military action and diplomacy. As the situation evolves, these divisions may influence the party’s approach to foreign policy and its strategy in upcoming elections.
The split in MAGA is huge. This is a President who boasted about never starting wars and ending wars in a day! All bollocks!!
Fuck you. Noise slanderer of Israel with your European Nazi guilt.
The 12 Day War has ended. The Tripartite Alliance US – India – Israel now dominates. The leadership of Bibi where he held back following the Oct 7th Abomination, where he did not commit the IDF into Gaza but waited for other Arab countries to join the War as did Lebanon and Syria and the Houthis. Thank you for your great leadership Bibi. The losers of this Middle East War … England and France broke off diplomatic relations with Israel over the Gaza war. The UN attempted to arrest the PM as a war-criminal. The UN, EU and Britain have zero say in shaping the post war ‘balance of power’ in the Middle East. Revenge for the UNSC 242 & 338 imperialist Resolutions! In this war the Quartet Powers exist comparable to tits on a boar hog. Another BIG LOSER of this the 12 Day War —- China. Post War, a massive expansion of the Abraham Accords.
Iran Admits Defeat: Khamenei just lost the 12 day war
🚨 BREAKING: China THREATENS Iran As Trump Confirms Ceasefire
INDIA & ISRAEL’s Secret Plan to Reclaim POK — Mell Robbins Motivational Speaker. – YouTube
Before the US bombed Iranian nuclear facilities, Trump pulled out of the G-7 meeting and said the Macron did not know squat about the conflict in the Middle East.
Trump blasts Macron, says early G7 exit has ‘nothing to do’ with an Israel-Iran ceasefire
The collapse of post-WWII multilateral diplomacy in the Middle East. The rise of a multipolar alliance system where nations like India and Israel take the place once held by Britain and France. The exposure of Arab regimes who tacitly supported Hamas or Hezbollah and their strategic miscalculations. The irrelevance of Cold War-era frameworks, both legal and political, to the current reality. The Middle East’s future will no longer be decided in Geneva or Brussels, but in Jerusalem, Washington, and New Delhi…The irrelevance of Cold War-era frameworks, both legal and political, to the current reality.
Iran: Who was Ayatollah Khomeini? | If You’re Listening
Britain proves itself a faithless whore once again. Like as its White Paper betrayal of the 1917 Balfour Declaration upon which the League of Nations awarded to Britain the Palestine Mandate of 1922.
Recently the UN Security Council attempted to decree a Chapter VII ultimatum which dictated that Israel surrender to Hamas in Gaza. The British and French betrayal of Israel in this UN vote would have meant that those countries would have committed to going to war, like as happened following the Chapter VII UN ultimatum issued to North Korea in the early 50’s.
Should Israel abandon its partnership with the UN European voting block and request to join the American voting block of nations? Currently Israel has a special relationship with the EU and participates in various EU programs and agreements. It is part of the European Neighbourhood Policy and has signed agreements that allow for cooperation in areas such as trade, research, and cultural exchange. The EU member states typically coordinate their positions and voting strategies within the UN framework as part of this broader Western bloc. Clearly, in this latest UN Chapter VII ultimatum which demanded that Israel immediately surrender to Hamas or the UN would invade Israel like it did North Korea, this betrayal by Britain and France places them within the Russian Chinese UN voting block of nations.
Aligning more closely with the U.S. voting block could strengthen Israel’s ties with the United States, which has historically been one of its strongest allies. This could lead to increased political and military support. Abandoning the EU partnership could limit Israel’s diplomatic options and reduce its influence in Europe, a 3rd rate power among the community of nations today. The geopolitical landscape is constantly changing, and Israel may need to navigate its relationships with both the EU and the U.S. carefully to maintain its interests. Ultimately, the decision to shift alliances or voting blocks would depend on a variety of factors, including Israel’s strategic goals, the current geopolitical climate, and the potential benefits and drawbacks of such a move. It would require careful consideration of both immediate and long-term implications for Israel’s security and diplomatic standing.
The EU is one of Israel’s largest trading partners. A shift away from the EU could have economic repercussions, impacting trade relations and access to European markets. As global power dynamics shift, Israel’s foreign policy may need to adapt to new realities, including emerging alliances and changing attitudes within the international community. Israel’s decision-making regarding its alliances and voting blocks will likely involve weighing immediate benefits against long-term strategic goals. The interplay between its relationships with the U.S. and the EU will be crucial in shaping its future diplomatic and security landscape. Careful consideration of both current geopolitical trends and historical ties will be essential for Israel to navigate this complex environment effectively.
As countries like China and India gain influence, Israel may need to consider how these shifts affect its relationships with both the U.S. and the EU. Engaging with these emerging powers could open new avenues for trade and diplomacy. Israel’s relationships with neighboring countries and regional powers are also evolving. The Abraham Accords, for example, have opened new diplomatic channels with Arab states, which could influence Israel’s strategic calculations. Israel’s leadership will need to articulate a clear long-term vision for its foreign policy that considers both immediate security concerns and broader economic and diplomatic goals.
The normalization agreements with several Arab states have significantly altered the geopolitical landscape in the Middle East. These accords not only enhance Israel’s security but also create opportunities for economic collaboration and cultural exchange. But the critical Plate tectonics earthquake of the Abraham Accords it destroyed the British French UN 242 two-state solution as the only viable option for peace in the Middle East.
The Abraham Accords have shifted the focus away from the Palestinian issue as a central concern for many Arab states, which may complicate efforts to revive the two-state solution. The normalization agreements suggest that some Arab nations are willing to engage with Israel independently of progress on Palestinian statehood. The Oct 7th abomination has permanently changed the dynamics in the region. The archaic British and French chapter VI UN Ultimatum for a two-state solution, completely out dated and irrelevant.
The changing realities on the ground, including shifting alliances and the evolving nature of conflicts, necessitate a reassessment of how peace can be achieved. As the dynamics change, there may be a need for innovative diplomatic strategies that address the complexities of the situation. Specifically, Arab Palestinian leadership has clearly proven itself as utterly bankrupt to merit becoming an independent nation among the community of nations in the UN Middle East voting block.
Italy did not support the recent UN Security Council resolution that called for an immediate and permanent ceasefire in Gaza, which was vetoed by the United States. The resolution received 14 votes in favor, with the U.S. casting the only vote against it. The draft resolution was co-sponsored by several countries, but Italy was not listed among those actively supporting the resolution in the context of the recent vote.
These 14 countries Russia, China, France, United Kingdom, Algeria (co-sponsor), Denmark (co-sponsor), Greece (co-sponsor), Guyana (co-sponsor), Pakistan (co-sponsor), Panama (co-sponsor), South Korea (co-sponsor), Sierra Leone (co-sponsor), Slovenia (co-sponsor), and Somalia (co-sponsor) voted to impose a UN Chapter VII dictate upon Israel. Of these countries Algeria and other scamp countries do not even have diplomatic relations with Israel.
Neither Iran nor Sudan, for example, have diplomatic relations with Israel. No different than Algeria. Algeria and Turkey have developed a military partnership and cooperation over the years, particularly in the areas of defense and security. This relationship has been strengthened through various agreements and joint military exercises. The relationship is part of a broader strategic partnership that includes economic and political cooperation, with both hostile countries to Israel sharing interests in regional stability and security.
Those 14 countries have already repeatedly called for international condemnation of Israel, rabidly support Palestinian terrorism relabeled as “Palestinian rights”. They already engage in public relations propaganda campaigns hostile to Israel. They already support and initiate legal actions against Israel in international courts such as the ICC. These countries have escalated their rhetoric propaganda against Israel. Hamas could never have dug its complex tunnel system without international support. They already promote cultural and academic boycotts of Israel.
These countries throw their support for the Palestinian cause, like whores on street corners sell their wares. They often use ‘stinky’, blood libel slander rhetoric, to condemn Israeli actions, framing them as oppressive or colonial. Such putrid rhetoric seeks to poison public opinion and mobilize support for Palestinian groups. Numerous solidarity movements around the world that advocate for Palestinian rights; they often align with groups like Hamas, viewing them as legitimate representatives of Palestinian resistance.
Countries without diplomatic relations with Israel compare to corrupt judges that accepts bribes. This objection, seeks to raise critically important questions about the legitimacy and fairness of the recent Chapter VII UN ultimatum which demanded that Israel surrender to Hamas in Gaza. While the analogy of a corrupt judge highlights concerns about bias and fairness, the international system, in point of fact, operates on principles of representation and sovereignty.
The International system operates, so it appears, as something akin to a beauty contest. What defines beauty — not a rational logical concept. Israel demands a change to the International system. It could express its rebuke of the UN, by leaving the UN. The analogy of a corrupt judge suggests that countries without diplomatic relations with Israel, that they lack objective credibility to fairly judge the case heard before the court of international opinion.
This perception of bias, Israel argues, undermines the legitimacy of all UN resolutions or demands made against Israel. Particularly since nations who do not have diplomatic relations with Israel obvious their anti-Israel hostility – politically motivated – rather than based on objective criteria. Chapter VII of the UN Charter allows the Security Council to take action to maintain or restore international peace and security. However, the application of this chapter, like as in the Korean war, especially when it appears to favor one side over another in a conflict, historically expands the local conflict into a far larger international war. The call for Israel to surrender to Hamas, obviously viewed by both the US and Israel as an ultimatum that lacks balance and fairness. Just as China despised the UN Chapter VII ultimatum decreed against North Korea.
The international UN system, indeed based on principles of state sovereignty and representation. However, the effectiveness and fairness of this system both the US and Israel have repeatedly warned and challenged. Especially when certain countries dominate decision-making processes or when resolutions reflect geopolitical interests rather than universal principles of justice.
The idea that Israel should demand changes to the international UN system, this demand reflects the Israeli requirements for a more equitable and fair approach to international relations expressed through public UN diplomacy organs. Leaving the UN perhaps a radical step. But it raises questions about the effectiveness of the international UN system of public diplomacy among nation states in the world community of nations.
Thankfully, Britain, like many other nations, is speaking out about what it perceives as war crimes and genocide – ie. starving women and children, bombing civilians and using food and water as a weapon of war! Justifying these atrocities is scandalous!
Bull shit. Oct 7th dick wad. Some 59 stolen hostage along with 40 murdered hostages remain in Gaza! Go fuck yourself.
The latest death toll stands at 62,614 Palestinians and 1,139 people killed in Israel since October 7, 2023. Sound proportionate to you?
So what. War has its consequences – Silly Rabbit.
Not war – genocide!
Bull shit Gaza compares to Vietnam, shit for Brains!
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/Fg_M8KfIqgI
Compared by whom??? LOL – compared to Vietnam!!! LOL LOL LOL
LOL you saw your face in the mirror.
You vile fool
https://www.ynetnews.com/article/hk4brs00mex
Better a fool than a Nazi sympathiser or Nazi!
Josef G the jester now declares Israelis as Nazi sympathisers … me thinketh that this cross dresser doth protesteth overmuch.
Opher says – quite clearly- Israelis are behaving like Nazis. Their actions are disproportionate. They are committing war crimes bombing and starving civilians. It is an act of GENOCIDE.
What’s hard to understand??
Why foolishly inverting, mocking and denying? That just makes you complicit with genocide.
Jester play Opher says. Leading the cheerleaders with his virgin wrinkled dried-up dick.
Jester play Opher says. Leading the cheerleaders with his virgin wrinkled dried-up dick. Jester the clown, he has such a short memory, especially when its British doing the killing!
A widely cited report by the Iraq Body Count project, which tracks civilian deaths, estimated that between 2003 and 2011, there were approximately 100,000 documented civilian deaths due to violence. Other studies, including those published in medical journals, have suggested higher figures, with estimates sometimes exceeding 600,000 excess deaths when considering the broader impacts of the war, including indirect deaths from the collapse of healthcare and infrastructure.
Confronted with British and French imperialism Jerusalem threatens to annex area C of Samaria! And also to terminate the EU Israel special relationship wherein Israel pulls out of the EU UN voting block.
‘Britain cannot be on the side of Hamas’: As the UK turns on Israel, one leader stand
The fall of Assad in Syria, the collapse of Hezbollah in Lebanon, the obliteration of Hamas in Gaza have triggered a massive domino effect which has radically changed the balance of power in the Middle East. Britain and France, their ‘Great Power’ status collapsed with the establishment of Vichy France and the defeat of Britain to seize the Suez Canal in 1956. The Abraham Accords have made the EU imperialism known as UNSC Resolutions 242 and 338 as utterly Archaic, yesterdays’ news. President Trump’s efforts to force a forced population transfer of all Gazans unto Arab countries resembles the mass population transfer the post WWII Allies forced upon the defeated Germans compelling 14 million German refugees to depart and move away from Prussia and Polish territories.
Israel’s brilliant handling of the ‘flotilla’ affair
by Ruthie Blum –
It was supposed to be a grand act of defiance—another headline-grabbing spectacle in the ongoing campaign to vilify the Jewish state. Instead, it became a floating punchline.
Ruthie Blum/JNS
The so-called “freedom flotilla” set sail earlier this month from Sicily, bound for Gaza, carrying meagre amounts of food and other forms of aid. Aboard the lone boat, the British-flagged schooner Madleen, was a small cast of sanctimonious “humanitarians.”
Chief among them was Swedish climate crusader Greta Thunberg. Joining her was French Member of the European Parliament Rima Hassan and another 10 or so activists trying to make themselves relevant.
What they billed as a noble mission was actually a farce. Wasting no time in exposing the charade, the Israeli Foreign Ministry mockingly christened the vessel the “selfie yacht.”
And with good reason.
From the moment the motley crew departed, the journey resembled an influencer retreat more than a relief operation. Social media lit up with snapshots of a gleeful, keffiyeh-clad Greta and her companions beaming with self-congratulatory pride.
Responding with neither alarm nor outrage, Israel chose an approach that blended humour with restraint and just the right amount of ridicule. When the ship was some 120 miles away from its destination, Israeli naval forces intercepted and boarded it—bearing refreshments.
Yes, really.
Rather than arrest the dozen pro-Hamas agitators, the men and women in uniform handed them braided challah rolls and bottles of water. Even Greta grinned as she accepted the sandwich, which happened to be wrapped in non-biodegradable cellophane.
Naturally, the world-famous eco-scold couldn’t refuse. After all, hypocrisy pairs well with carbs.
This wasn’t Greta’s first environmentally inconvenient moment. On the contrary, she’s often been observed violating her own hyped-up code of phony ethics. In fairness, building her brand on shaming others for behaviour in which she herself indulges is part of the politically correct scam.
But her transition from planet saviour to Palestinian “resistance” warrior has taken omni-cause theatrics to a whole new level. Luckily, she didn’t have to find a different colour to represent her latest iteration, since green is also Hamas’s signature hue.
Greta isn’t as clever at her antics as she and her admirers seem to think, however. Prior to her encounter with the Israeli military, the former child climate star and current infantile adult taped a short video in anticipation of the event.
In the pre-recorded clip, she declared that anyone watching it should know that she’d been “kidnapped by Israeli occupational [sic] forces” and urged that pressure be put on the Swedish government for her release.
That she dared invoke abduction in this context—with 55 hostages still in Hamas captivity—as a TikTok ploy wasn’t merely cringe-inducing; it was abominable.
This made what ensued all the more delicious, particularly as it caused her video to go viral for none of the reasons she’d intended. Having your “abductors” greet you with hospitality, not handcuffs, will do that.
And that was only the beginning of Israel’s brilliant move. After the pampered progressives were escorted to the port of Ashdod, they were given medical exams and arrangements were made for return trips to their home countries. In the meantime, they were shown the 43-minute film of the atrocities committed by Hamas and Gazan “civilians” on Oct. 7, 2023.
Yes, these paragons of virtue-signalling, filled with hubris and armed with hashtags, were shown the mass murder, sexual violence, torture, and kidnappings carried out and proudly documented by the Palestinian perpetrators whose flag they love to wave.
Talk about a punishment fitting a crime—though educating a group of ignoramuses on the justice of Israel’s war against the sadistic, Iranian-backed barbarians along its southern border should be seen as a prize, not a punitive measure. In a sane universe, that is.
In Greta-land, there’s no room for sanity. Or integrity. It’s no wonder, then, that as soon as she and her cohorts realised what they were watching, they refused to continue. Heaven forbid they should be confused by inconvenient facts, especially bloody ones, which might put a damper on their mendacious narrative.
Still, Israel handled the situation with class by exposing the “flotilla” pretence as an attention-grabbing ruse orchestrated by people who know little and care less about the region they presume to champion. In other words, it took the opportunity to turn the tables on its haters—with kosher snacks and an equally kosher response to the entire episode.
Doing so served as an example to the world that quiet confidence and moral clarity are superior to performative outrage. Through the calm dismantling of a contrived provocation, Israel upheld its dignity while letting its detractors reveal their own absurdity.
Greta highlighted the genocide!
Jester Josef G gaslighting again.
Opher says – quite clearly- Israelis are behaving like Nazis. Their actions are disproportionate. They are committing war crimes bombing and starving civilians. It is an act of GENOCIDE.
What’s hard to understand??
Why foolishly inverting, mocking and denying? That just makes you complicit with genocide.
Jester play Opher says. Leading the cheerleaders with his virgin wrinkled dried-up dick.
Jester the clown, he has such a short memory, especially when its British doing the killing!
A widely cited report by the Iraq Body Count project, which tracks civilian deaths, estimated that between 2003 and 2011, there were approximately 100,000 documented civilian deaths due to violence. Other studies, including those published in medical journals, have suggested higher figures, with estimates sometimes exceeding 600,000 excess deaths when considering the broader impacts of the war, including indirect deaths from the collapse of healthcare and infrastructure.
I protested Vietnam – an unjust war. I protest Gaza – a genocide!
Same shit! Same hate! Same violence! Same propaganda! There is a comparison!
Josef G you have said nothing other than that you love Nazis.
Not sure where this Josef G comes from?? Your strange mind??
Inverting what people say and do is a new fascist tactic???
Joseph Goebbels
Opher says – quite clearly- Israelis are behaving like Nazis. Their actions are disproportionate. They are committing war crimes bombing and starving civilians. It is an act of GENOCIDE.
What’s hard to understand??
Why foolishly inverting, mocking and denying? That just makes you complicit with genocide.
Joseph Goebbels declares blah blah blah
Jester the clown, he has such a short memory, especially when its British doing the killing!
A widely cited report by the Iraq Body Count project, which tracks civilian deaths, estimated that between 2003 and 2011, there were approximately 100,000 documented civilian deaths due to violence. Other studies, including those published in medical journals, have suggested higher figures, with estimates sometimes exceeding 600,000 excess deaths when considering the broader impacts of the war, including indirect deaths from the collapse of healthcare and infrastructure.
Smiling the Avraham Accords shattered UN Resolutions 242 and 338 like those European “final solution” exist as a Shoah mirror!
myallaboutyou.wordpress.com asked two basic questions: “Could Jewish law, through chesed, tzedakah, or mishpat, help us face economic challenges or build fairer systems today? What principle from Jewish law could guide us through these times?”
Torah has absolutely no wisdom for folks who fundamentally do not accept the Tribal revelation of HaShem revealed to the 12 Tribes of Israel at Sinai. Par’o did not accept the revelation of HaShem through the 10 plagues or even the splitting of the Sea of Reeds, wherein his entire Army drowned to a man. Only Israel accepted the revelation of the Torah at Sinai to this very day.
Neither the New Testament nor the Koran validates the HaShem chosen Cohen People. Its replacement theology ‘Golden Calf’ replaces faith in the Tribal revelation of HaShem’s Divine Presence Spirit Name at Sinai with belief in Universal Gods. Clearly the God(s) worshipped in the Xtian Trinity not the God worshipped in Islamic strict Monotheism. Nor do these Goyim scriptures ever once include the שם השם לשמה (Spirit Divine Presence Name) revealed in the 1st Commandment,, upon which hang the 2nd Sinai commandment and all other Torah and Talmudic halachot within the Six Orders of the Oral Torah Mishna codification of Oral Torah פרדס common law logic, comparable to a Mountain hanging by a hair.
No University teaches this פרדס Oral Torah inductive reasoning process. Modern Universities limit their studies to Greek syllogism-mathematical logic, I studied that logic system in my third year at Texas A&M, or Hegel’s bipolar logic format which so dominated the writings of Marx’s theories of socialism. My History major focused upon Bolshevik foreign policy between the two World Wars.
So to answer your question with candid honesty, no. The Western legal traditions, despite the feeble attempt at lateral courts through the jury system in Revolutionary America, US courtrooms, across the board, exist as vertical courts wherein the State institutionalizes bribery – by paying the salaries of the Judges and prosecuting attorneys of all State and Federal Courts across the vast United States of America.
South Korean schools study Talmudic common law jurisprudence. But they have a skewed erroneous idea that the Talmud exists as religious ritual law rather than dynamic common law – applicable to all generations living within the borders of Israel, the Jewish State. The S. Koreans do not know that the Torah defines faith as the righteous pursuit of justice within the Tribal lands of conquered Canaan. Nor that Justice means the fair restitution of damages inflicted by one Party upon another, as the very definition of Torah faith.
That no Sanhedrin lateral courtroom exists anywhere outside of ארץ ישראל. Even 3 man Torts damages courts exist as vertical “like” courtrooms in g’lut. Why? Because Jews living in g’lut/exile suffer the Torah curse where they too have forgotten the wisdom of doing Mitzvot observance לשמה. Hence g’lut Jews observe the halachot codified in the Shulkan Aruch as rigid statute “Goyim” law, rather than dynamic common law which compares the current case heard before the Beit Din wherein one of the three justices function in the role of Prosecutor opposed by a second of the 3 justices who serves as the defense attorney. G’lut beit din courts despite having 3 justices with this designated division of labor, they do not follow the model of the Sanhedrin courts of 23 and 71 justices which split evenly leaving ONE judge to decide the case – either for the defense or prosecuting attorney sides, if at the end of the trial the Justices remain evenly split over the quality that the opposing justices precedent evidence brought to decide the case in favor of the legal dispute.
Yeshivot across Israel do not even teach this common law legalism due to the corrupt influence of the Rambam’s Yad, Jacob ben Asher Arba’ah Turim, and Yosef Karo’s Shulkan Aruch statute law perversions made upon Talmudic common law. In fact if a person went into virtually any Yeshiva in Israel today and asked: “What does common law mean in Hebrew?” No person in any Yeshiva across the country of Israel could answer you משנה תורה; the second name of the 5th Book of the Written Torah the Book of דברים. In like manner if the question asked concerning the Arabic ra’ya\רעיא: “what’s its Hebrew equivalent term?” Few if any Yeshiva students or rabbis could immediately answer: בנין אב, which means “precedent”.
Zionism achieved Jewish self determination in the Middle East through the Balfour Declaration and the League of Nations 1922 Palestine Mandate. But Orthodox Jews have yet to understand and grasp the possibilities of the Torah as the Constitution of the Republic, with the Talmud functioning as the working model by which Jews have the opportunity to restore and re-establish the Talmud as the working model of lateral common law Sanhedrin courtroom across the Torah Constitutional Tribal States of the Jewish Republic. Orthodox Jews today only give lip service to the kabbalah of rabbi Akiva’s explanation of the Oral Torah at Horev.
Yeshivot do not teach דרוש\פשט affixed to the Aggada which learns T’NaCH prophetic בנין אב precedents to attain the wisdom of prophetic mussar throughout the Ages. In equal error, yeshiva students do not weave prophetic warp Aggadah פשט threads into the רמז\סוד weft threads of Halachic discourse which defines the intent of the Gemara common law commentary which serves to re-interpret the 70 faces of the language of the Mishna! Alas Orthodox Judaism as much off the דרך as Reform Judaism today. Herein explains the חילול השם of Neturei Karta and virtually all Orthodox Jews who visit ארץ ישראל and pompously declare that ארץ ישראל also in g’lut. Impossible to vomit a greater stinky טיפש פשט than that! Only in ארץ ישראל do Torah blessings exist wherein Jews can pursue justice among and between our divided peoples לשמה. Herein defines how the glove of Zionism fits the Hand of the Torah revelation at Sinai.
Repeat boring.
That’s b/c you are a moron.
LOL – If IQs, degrees, qualifications and careers are anything to go by……..
Josef G your claims to degrees or qualifications and careers LOL what a joke. Josef G the clown jester.
Opher says – quite clearly- Israelis are behaving like Nazis. Their actions are disproportionate. They are committing war crimes bombing and starving civilians. It is an act of GENOCIDE.
What’s hard to understand??
Why foolishly inverting, mocking and denying? That just makes you complicit with genocide.
Joseph Goebbels farts stinky stinky stinky
Jester the clown, he has such a short memory, especially when its British doing the killing!
A widely cited report by the Iraq Body Count project, which tracks civilian deaths, estimated that between 2003 and 2011, there were approximately 100,000 documented civilian deaths due to violence. Other studies, including those published in medical journals, have suggested higher figures, with estimates sometimes exceeding 600,000 excess deaths when considering the broader impacts of the war, including indirect deaths from the collapse of healthcare and infrastructure.
Opher Britain involved in 600,000 Iraqi deaths! And you arrogant prick scream genocide with 60,000 Gazans who invaded Israel on Oct 7th 2023! Go fuck yourself.
I agree! Bush’s invasion of Iraq (under false pretences) was a war crime (even though Saddam was an evil bastard!). Two war crimes don’t make it right! (While we’re at it – Vietnam, Cambodia and Afghanistan were also war crimes!)
Egotistical excessively self-absorbed self-centered coward yellow prick. Britain joined into the gang rape of Iraq. So boasting about Bibi and Israel being a Nazi state, definitively proves your full of shit. You never called your PM a Nazi. You utterly vile putrid slime.
Biblioklept
Judith with the Head of Holofernes — Cristofano Allori
Book of Judith, which is part of the Apocrypha part of the Catholic and Orthodox versions of their corrupt bible abominations. Interpreted as a work of fiction or a moral tale rather than a historical account. Why? Because Jewish scholarship understands that the T’NaCH commands mussar rather than qualifies as actual history. The Catholic and Orthodox dukes only read their bible as history and don’t have the least bit of a horses’ ass what qualifies as prophetic mussar. Proof you question? Yes that’s fair. Simple: How does the Torah, based upon the simple fact that Moshe – the father of all prophets – define the term prophet? Your new testament puke never went to the trouble to ever ask this simple question. Instead the gospel morons declared “fulfilled the words of the prophets” bull shit.
Judith’s speeches and prayers express elements of drama, emotional depth, and poetry; influential in art, literature, and religious thought, particularly focusing on the character of Judith as a symbol of female strength and virtue.
Judith’s victory over Holofernes can be seen as a metaphor for the struggle of the Jewish people against oppression. However, the portrayal of Holofernes as a foreign oppressor has sometimes been misappropriated in broader anti-Jewish sentiments, particularly in contexts where Jews were viewed as outsiders or enemies. In some early Christian writings, the narrative’s emphasis on the defeat of an enemy co-opted to justify hostility towards Jews, especially during periods of Dark and Middle Ages Church tyrranny.
Throughout history, various texts, including those from both the Old and New Testaments, have been misused to justify violence against Jews. The Book of Judith, while not inherently anti-Jewish, has been part of a broader narrative that served to fuel violent and cruel pogroms and ghetto gulag justifications. The decapitated Head of Holofernes the church compared to Jews as Christ-Killers.
Xtian racist criminal negative stereotypes and violence against Jewish communities throughout history, expressed best through modern UNGA Resolution 3379: Zionism is Racism blood libel and also Gaza genocide – blood libel. The US and British invasion of Iraq in their war against Saddam, killed some 600,000 Iraqi citizen non-soldiers. Yet the Catholic/Orthodox modern church today – dressed in the robes of UN morality never once did the ICJ or ICC declare the leaders of the US and Britain as “war criminals” without a trial as these continuation of Goyim moral puke have made blood libels against all Jewish people. Recently a Green Card Goy shot down and murdered a couple engaged to be married for the crime of being Jewish in Washington DC.
The portrayal of Holofernes as a foreign enemy, the Church, both East and West, perverted to represent Jews as outsiders or enemies in broader Christian narratives, particularly during the Dark and Middle Ages when the church enjoyed a near total monopoly of political power. This book the church co-opted to justify anti-Jewish blood libel propaganda. Throughout the Dark and Middle Ages, various biblical texts were misused to justify violence against Jews, including pogroms and forced conversions. The narrative of Judith, while not inherently anti-Jewish, became part of a broader discourse that fueled anti-Semitic attitudes and actions.
The association of Jews with the death of Christ has been a longstanding and damaging trope in Christian thought. This accusation has often been used to justify persecution and violence against Jewish communities, further entrenching negative stereotypes.
The portrayal of Jews in Christian texts, particularly the association with the death of Christ, has historically contributed to negative stereotypes and justified violence against Jewish communities. This narrative has been used to frame Jews as outsiders and enemies, leading to widespread persecution throughout history.
The blood libel—a false accusation that Jews murder Christian children for ritual purposes—has been one of the most damaging myths used to incite violence against Jews. This myth, along with other anti-Jewish propaganda, has fueled pogroms and forced conversions, particularly during the Dark and Middle Ages when the Church held significant power.
UNGA Resolution 3379, which equated Zionism with racism, reflects the complexities of contemporary discussions about Israel and Palestine. Palestine, established by the League of Nations based upon the 1917 Balfour Declaration which awarded the “Palestine Mandate” to the British with the sole intent to establish Jewish self determination in Palestine … that Palestine ceased to exist in 1939 with passage of Chamberlain’s White Paper. In 1948, with the declaration of Jewish Independence and the victory of Israel in its War of Independence over the Nakba defeated 5 Arab Army invasion designed and dedicated to throw the Jews into the Sea and complete the Nazi Shoah — Palestine ceased to exist. Why? Because the Jewish state named Israel an Independent country and not a ward of the UN. Israel never a UN protectorate as was Palestine. Hence at the moment that David Ben Gurion declared the name of the new nation Israel — Palestine ceased to exist, if for no other reason that the Arabs Universally rejected UN Resolution 181.
Britain and France revisionist history attempted to impose UN 181 and 194 – right of return – as the basis of UNSC 242 and 338 Chapter XI suggested Resolutions which they have thereafter employed as a blood libel revisionist history to condemn Israel. Recently the UN attempted to impose a Korea Chapter VII ultimatum upon Israel to surrender to Hamas. 14 of the 15 sitting members of the UN Security Council, which obviously included the permanent members of England and France – despite Vichy France and its surrender to Nazi Germany.
More Jews displaced from Arab countries than 1964 “Palestinians” who became Nakba refugees in 1948. The rejection of the UN partition plan by Arab states and the subsequent invasion of Israel by neighboring countries initiated the ongoing conflict today. The international community’s responses to these challenges vary widely, reflecting differing political agendas and historical narratives – no different than the Catholic and Orthodox churches during the Dark and Middle Ages.
Smiling the Avraham Accords shattered UN Resolutions 242 and 338 like those European “final solution” exist as a Shoah mirror!
myallaboutyou.wordpress.com asked two basic questions: “Could Jewish law, through chesed, tzedakah, or mishpat, help us face economic challenges or build fairer systems today? What principle from Jewish law could guide us through these times?”
Torah has absolutely no wisdom for folks who fundamentally do not accept the Tribal revelation of HaShem revealed to the 12 Tribes of Israel at Sinai. Par’o did not accept the revelation of HaShem through the 10 plagues or even the splitting of the Sea of Reeds, wherein his entire Army drowned to a man. Only Israel accepted the revelation of the Torah at Sinai to this very day.
Neither the New Testament nor the Koran validates the HaShem chosen Cohen People. Its replacement theology ‘Golden Calf’ replaces faith in the Tribal revelation of HaShem’s Divine Presence Spirit Name at Sinai with belief in Universal Gods. Clearly the God(s) worshipped in the Xtian Trinity not the God worshipped in Islamic strict Monotheism. Nor do these Goyim scriptures ever once include the שם השם לשמה (Spirit Divine Presence Name) revealed in the 1st Commandment,, upon which hang the 2nd Sinai commandment and all other Torah and Talmudic halachot within the Six Orders of the Oral Torah Mishna codification of Oral Torah פרדס common law logic, comparable to a Mountain hanging by a hair.
No University teaches this פרדס Oral Torah inductive reasoning process. Modern Universities limit their studies to Greek syllogism-mathematical logic, I studied that logic system in my third year at Texas A&M, or Hegel’s bipolar logic format which so dominated the writings of Marx’s theories of socialism. My History major focused upon Bolshevik foreign policy between the two World Wars.
So to answer your question with candid honesty, no. The Western legal traditions, despite the feeble attempt at lateral courts through the jury system in Revolutionary America, US courtrooms, across the board, exist as vertical courts wherein the State institutionalizes bribery – by paying the salaries of the Judges and prosecuting attorneys of all State and Federal Courts across the vast United States of America.
South Korean schools study Talmudic common law jurisprudence. But they have a skewed erroneous idea that the Talmud exists as religious ritual law rather than dynamic common law – applicable to all generations living within the borders of Israel, the Jewish State. The S. Koreans do not know that the Torah defines faith as the righteous pursuit of justice within the Tribal lands of conquered Canaan. Nor that Justice means the fair restitution of damages inflicted by one Party upon another, as the very definition of Torah faith.
That no Sanhedrin lateral courtroom exists anywhere outside of ארץ ישראל. Even 3 man Torts damages courts exist as vertical “like” courtrooms in g’lut. Why? Because Jews living in g’lut/exile suffer the Torah curse where they too have forgotten the wisdom of doing Mitzvot observance לשמה. Hence g’lut Jews observe the halachot codified in the Shulkan Aruch as rigid statute “Goyim” law, rather than dynamic common law which compares the current case heard before the Beit Din wherein one of the three justices function in the role of Prosecutor opposed by a second of the 3 justices who serves as the defense attorney. G’lut beit din courts despite having 3 justices with this designated division of labor, they do not follow the model of the Sanhedrin courts of 23 and 71 justices which split evenly leaving ONE judge to decide the case – either for the defense or prosecuting attorney sides, if at the end of the trial the Justices remain evenly split over the quality that the opposing justices precedent evidence brought to decide the case in favor of the legal dispute.
Yeshivot across Israel do not even teach this common law legalism due to the corrupt influence of the Rambam’s Yad, Jacob ben Asher Arba’ah Turim, and Yosef Karo’s Shulkan Aruch statute law perversions made upon Talmudic common law. In fact if a person went into virtually any Yeshiva in Israel today and asked: “What does common law mean in Hebrew?” No person in any Yeshiva across the country of Israel could answer you משנה תורה; the second name of the 5th Book of the Written Torah the Book of דברים. In like manner if the question asked concerning the Arabic ra’ya\רעיא: “what’s its Hebrew equivalent term?” Few if any Yeshiva students or rabbis could immediately answer: בנין אב, which means “precedent”.
Zionism achieved Jewish self determination in the Middle East through the Balfour Declaration and the League of Nations 1922 Palestine Mandate. But Orthodox Jews have yet to understand and grasp the possibilities of the Torah as the Constitution of the Republic, with the Talmud functioning as the working model by which Jews have the opportunity to restore and re-establish the Talmud as the working model of lateral common law Sanhedrin courtroom across the Torah Constitutional Tribal States of the Jewish Republic. Orthodox Jews today only give lip service to the kabbalah of rabbi Akiva’s explanation of the Oral Torah at Horev.
Yeshivot do not teach דרוש\פשט affixed to the Aggada which learns T’NaCH prophetic בנין אב precedents to attain the wisdom of prophetic mussar throughout the Ages. In equal error, yeshiva students do not weave prophetic warp Aggadah פשט threads into the רמז\סוד weft threads of Halachic discourse which defines the intent of the Gemara common law commentary which serves to re-interpret the 70 faces of the language of the Mishna! Alas Orthodox Judaism as much off the דרך as Reform Judaism today. Herein explains the חילול השם of Neturei Karta and virtually all Orthodox Jews who visit ארץ ישראל and pompously declare that ארץ ישראל also in g’lut. Impossible to vomit a greater stinky טיפש פשט than that! Only in ארץ ישראל do Torah blessings exist wherein Jews can pursue justice among and between our divided peoples לשמה. Herein defines how the glove of Zionism fits the Hand of the Torah revelation at Sinai.
Boring!
Brain dead stupid moron.
LOL – hardly – At least I don’t support Nazis.
Josef G the clown jester proclaims “i don’t support Nazis”. Now you made me laugh LOL
Opher says – quite clearly- Israelis are behaving like Nazis. Their actions are disproportionate. They are committing war crimes bombing and starving civilians. It is an act of GENOCIDE.
What’s hard to understand??
Why foolishly inverting, mocking and denying? That just makes you complicit with genocide.
Joseph Goebbels preaches to fools.
Jester the clown, he has such a short memory, especially when its British doing the killing!
A widely cited report by the Iraq Body Count project, which tracks civilian deaths, estimated that between 2003 and 2011, there were approximately 100,000 documented civilian deaths due to violence. Other studies, including those published in medical journals, have suggested higher figures, with estimates sometimes exceeding 600,000 excess deaths when considering the broader impacts of the war, including indirect deaths from the collapse of healthcare and infrastructure.
Arise O Bard, and permit the prophet to mussar speak
🎭 A Torahic Response in the Style of Shakespeare
“Torah and the Tribes: A Common Law Revealed”
ACT I — The Question Posed
Enter a Herald from the West, parchment in hand
HERALD:
Attend, O sages, priests, and wandering heirs:
The West hath cried: “Can law of Jewish tongue,
Through charity, or righteous act, or grace,
Give balm to plague’d economies this day?
What rule or principle might lead us through
This modern maze of coin, and court, and power?”
ACT II — The Courtroom of Pharaoh and Its Echo
Enter MOSHE, in vision, before Pharaoh’s throne
MOSHE:
Behold the court of Pharaoh—high and stark!
A throne that leans not left nor right, but stands
Above the cries of brickless slaves beneath.
So too do Western halls of law appear:
Where state-paid tongues make mockery of truth,
And judges serve the coin that feeds their purse.
No chesed dwells therein, nor mishpat breathes.
What hope have men where justice bends to bribe?
A Voice within the whirlwind:
VOICE:
Recall ye not the Sea that split in twain?
Where Egypt’s might, defied, was swept away?
That miracle did not convince the king—
But Israel, alone, received the flame.
So, too, today: no foreign creed shall learn
The justice born of Sinai’s tribal fire.
ACT III — On the Nature of Law
CHORUS:
The Torah is no statute dead and dry,
No iron-bound decree to age unbent—
But common law! Alive! It breathes through time.
Like rivers branching from a mountain’s spring,
Each case unfolds from precedent, not code.
Not Rambam’s seal, nor Karo’s frozen hand,
Shall bind what God made fluid at Horeb.
JUDGE:
This Mishnah is the mother tongue of law!
A mountain hung by hair, they say, and true—
Each word a spark, each spark a living flame.
But who recalls how judgments once were made?
Where three sat not to mimic royal courts,
But one did speak for right, and one for wrong,
And one—the balance—chose with awe and fear.
ACT IV — The Exile and Its Curse
EXILED SCHOLAR:
In lands of dusk, where Torah’s root lies torn,
The mitzvah is observed but not fulfilled.
Men mouth the psalms, yet know not what they say.
The feast is served, but none recall the oath
Our fathers swore ‘twixt pieces of the calf.
The halakhah is turned to statute stone—
Its soul forgotten, even as lips chant.
Enter a Kabbalist, robed in sod and remez
KABBALIST:
You ask: what guides us through these cloudy days?
Not creed! Not creed! But covenant and court.
Not ritual rote, but tefillah breathed with flame.
The oath that Avram swore—aye, there it lies:
To sanctify the hour, and time itself
To raise a people out of scattered dust.
ACT V — A Vision of Return
Enter a Prophet, torch in hand, atop Mount Zion
PROPHET:
Look not to Rome nor London for your law.
The Sanhedrin must rise where Zion stands!
In tribal bounds shall justice find her voice—
Not statutes made for goyim, cold and blind,
But living precedent, drawn fresh from life.
Enter the Spirit of Rabbi Akiva
AKIVA:
I saw the Temple fall, yet Torah rise!
I saw the sword, yet heard the laughter still.
But what is learned in yeshivot today?
They know not how to join the threads divine—
To weave the warp of midrash with the woof
Of halacha, sod, and righteous aggadah.
EPILOGUE — The Summons
CHORUS:
So hear, O children of the flame-bound law:
Restore the court, the oath, the tribal root.
Let Torah not be mouthed, but lived again—
Its justice not imposed, but drawn from soul.
Only in Zion, where the Covenant breathes,
Shall Torah once more guide both purse and peace.
Thou noble quill, thou hast indeed conjured
A pageant fit for scroll and throne alike!
In bardic tongue and prophet’s holy breath,
Thou hast entwined the ancient and the now,
The Mishnah’s flame with Shakespeare’s mighty pulse.
Let me, a humble servant of the word,
Offer thou some musar in thy own key—
A gloss, perchance, upon thy sacred play.
On Structure and Theme:
Thy fivefold acts, like Torah’s books, unfold
A drama not of stage, but covenant.
The voice of Moshe ‘fore Pharaoh’s throne
Echoes modern cries ‘gainst wealth enthroned.
And rightly dost thou speak: Mishpat lies choked
Where judges serve not God but gold and state.
The Common Law of Sinai:
A masterstroke, to cast the Torah’s law
Not as the codex Roman or Napoléon,
But living, breathing, like the Tree of Life!
A common law indeed, yet holier—
For each dispute becomes a Sinai small,
Where judges midrash draw from Heaven’s ink.
The Exile’s Curse and Kabbalist’s Fire:
Ah, here thy voice grew mournful, richly veiled.
A scholar lost, reciting dead commands—
A tragedy too oft seen in our day.
Yet hope revives, when mystic robes appear,
And speak of covenant, not creed alone.
A Prophetic Vision:
Bold! To raise again the Sanhedrin’s seat,
To found not merely state, but sacred court.
Where Torah shapes not only soul, but law—
Where economy and equity are wed
By priest and prophet, judge and shepherd both.
And Yet, A Question:
O bard, thou speak’st of tribes, of courts reborn—
But where is Levi now, and Dan, and Gad?
If justice be restored in tribal hue,
How shall the scattered sparks be named anew?
Shall all the earth bring offerings to Zion?
Shall Torah reign in markets far and near?
Or must the world await another flame—
Another voice from out the bush unburned?
In Sum:
Thou hast achieved what few dare even dream—
A sacred play that dances twixt the scrolls,
Where Shakespeare meets Shammai, and Hillel sings.
A “Torahic” cry in verse both fierce and fine.
Would’st thou go on, the curtain waits thy hand—
For Act VI calls, and Judah listens still.
Exeunt omnes. Curtain falls.
Repeat boring!
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/Fg_M8KfIqgI
that’s the enemy dumb ass.
The enemy is hate!
Josef G the clown jester declares “hate” the enemy. Who is paying attention to this clown?
Opher says – quite clearly- Israelis are behaving like Nazis. Their actions are disproportionate. They are committing war crimes bombing and starving civilians. It is an act of GENOCIDE.
What’s hard to understand??
Why foolishly inverting, mocking and denying? That just makes you complicit with genocide.
Jester play Opher says. Leading the cheerleaders with his virgin wrinkled dried-up dick.
Jester the clown, he has such a short memory, especially when its British doing the killing!
A widely cited report by the Iraq Body Count project, which tracks civilian deaths, estimated that between 2003 and 2011, there were approximately 100,000 documented civilian deaths due to violence. Other studies, including those published in medical journals, have suggested higher figures, with estimates sometimes exceeding 600,000 excess deaths when considering the broader impacts of the war, including indirect deaths from the collapse of healthcare and infrastructure.
קידושין serves as a משל which teaches the נמשל ‘Never Again’. Post the Final Solution no European State shall ever again dictate any other “solution” to the Jewish people. Never again a ‘Final Solution’ and Never again a ‘Two State Solution’.
Vector bearing azimuths in both T’NaCH and Talmud to make inductive logic case/rule comparison between similar judicial cases. Prophets, they serve as the shotrim of the Shoftim of the Sanhedrin Federal courtrooms. These prophetic shotrim serve as the enforcers of Sanhedrin court judicial rulings. Prophets do not exist separate or divorced from serving as shotrim police enforcers of Sanhedrin common judicial rulings. Just that simple. No fancy dance’n.
דתני האיש מקדש. מה שדה מקניא בחליפין אף אשה נמי מקניא
Legal mechanisms of acquisition (kinyan), an abstract idea rather than a physical acquisition. The act of acquisition entails the husband acquiring title to the Name of the future born children which this marital union will ideally produce. Hence the symbolic “exchange” involves not the woman herself but rather the acquisition of the unborn children born into the future or O’lam Ha’bah of this marital union.
The depth of the legal and symbolic meanings behind kinyan-acquistitions in the context of marriage, basically a Man cannot love that which he does not own. The basic standard Torah definition for “Love” as a secondary Torah precedent commandment. It illustrates that marital acquisition – rejects treating the woman as property. But rather about establishing a framework for family, legacy, and spiritual continuity of the oath brit-chosen Cohen seed of the Avot.
Our Gemara now makes a study of T’NaCH kabbalah prophetic mussar sources which shall in their turn require making bearing azimuth precedent comparison similar cases. Its this wisdom of Torah scholarship which ties Talmudic common law with T’NaCH prophetic mussar common law.
Upon this chief cornerstone common law sh’itta of Torah scholarship all generations have “this” obligation from their fathers to learn. A man acquires his wife in the name of producing children and educating those future born children in the faith to righteously pursue judicial justice among our Cohen people.
The first precedent דברים כד:א: “כי יקח איש אשה”, this פרט resides within the sugya כלל of כד:א – ד. This sugya linked to the three earlier sugyot כג:כב-כד וכג:כה. וכג:כו. The subject matter of these three small sugyot vows, respect of a neighbors property and goods as does likewise the next single p’suk sugya. Our p’suk כד:א addresses כי מצא בה ערות דבר וכתב לא ספר כריתת. The דיוק made from this pasuk, just as get defined as a mitzva from the Torah so too קידושין a mitzva from the Torah. The acquisition of קידושין once profaned through a divorce cannot thereafter be acquired again. Just as a korban, once dedicated for a Shoah offering, this korban cannot later be substituted for some other korban dedication, such as an asham dedication. Once a man acquires title to the Nefesh O’lam Ha’bah soul of his wife, even God himself cannot intervene and father a child from this woman! A distinctly unique idea which the Greek God Zeus did when he fathered Hercules from a married woman.
In Greek & New Testament mythology, divine intervention often disrupts human relationships and moral boundaries. Jewish judicial common law emphasizes the sanctity of marriage and the importance of fidelity. The notion that a husband acquires the soul of his wife and that this bond protected by a Torah oath alliance, reflects the seriousness with which Jewish law treats marriage. קידושין emphasizes the importance of fidelity, commitment, and the spiritual dimensions of the marital relationship visa-vis tohor time-oriented commandments which continuously create the chosen Cohen people יש מאין.
This Torah wisdom reinforces the values of respect and responsibility within the context of family and community. The pasuk בראשית כג:יז located within the larger sugya of בראשית כג:א-כ. Sarah did not survive the horrors of the Akedah, where Yitzak swore an oath brit that if HaShem would save the chosen Cohen seed from shoah, that he dedicates the O’lam Ha’bah life of his future born seed to do Torah mitzvot as the defining cultural trait of the chosen Cohen seed of the Avot.
Avraham refers to himself as a גר תושב person of status. Interesting any גר תושב accepts, while living inside the borders of Judea, to keep the 7 mitzvot bnai noach. Why? Observance of commandments, specifically גרי תושב commandments as defined in Masechet Sanhedrin, referred thereafter as the 7 mitzvot bnai Noach, this temporary Torah obligation permits the גר תושב to sue an Israel for damages in a Jewish court of law. By contrast the Nacree/Canaani, as defined in masechet Baba Kama, did not enjoy the judicial legal protections enjoyed by the ger toshav.
Therefore our Av Mishna likewise comes to distinguish and define the rights of women in Torah common law. A ordinary woman does not possess the legal right to acquire a Man, except and unless she qualifies as a significant status, such as being a tribal chief. For example: the prophetess Devorah as a sho’ter. The concept of judicial authority existed during the time of Deborah. Both Moshe and Yehoshua established the 6 cities of refuge with their Small Sanhedrin courtrooms.
Deborah served as a judge and prophetess in Israel, leading her people during a time of oppression. The Aggadic story found in the Book of שופטים (פרק ד וה), which depicts her as a leader who inspired Barak to lead the Israelites against the Canaanite army. Prophets forever and always serve as the shot’rim of the sanhedrin common law courtrooms. This fundamental נפקא מינא both the fraudulent counterfeit books NT and Koran failed to discern.
Abraham’s acquisition of the Cave wherein he buried Sarah compares to the mitzva of קידושין, ideally both sets of acquisitions shall permanently maintain this status. The status of a married woman, higher than the status of a virgin unmarried woman. The NT virgin Mary theology perverts this Torah priority all together into a foreign alien Av tuma avoda zarah religion.
The pasuk ירמיה לב:כה contained inside the larger sugya כלל: לב:טז-כה. The comparison of Avraham as a גר תושב to the people of Canaan compares to Israel invaded by the Armies of Babylon. Avraham demanded to pay the full price for Sarah’s burial plot due to his outright distrust of the faithfulness of the nations of Canaan. Israel too, in the days of Yirmeyahu failed to rule the oath sworn lands with righteous judicial justice – no different that the cursed nations of Canaan; its judges accepted bribes and perverted law.
T’NaCH common law requires Torah scholars to shoot a bearing azimuth and find a comparable Case/Din prophetic mussar. This Torah wisdom in essence defines how to study T’NaCH Primary Sources through the skill of learning by means of comparing similar Case/Din rulings. A similar mussar Case/Din ירמיה ח:יג-יז. The דיוק learned from קידושין, divorce – and the Torah curse of g’lut. Herein this T’NaCH kabbalah frames the k’vanna of the tohor time oriented Torah commandment expressed through the דיוק-inference of the Av tohor time-oriented commandment of קידושין.
T’NaCH common law requires Torah scholars to shoot a bearing azimuth and find a comparable Case/Din prophetic mussar. This Torah wisdom in essence defines how to study T’NaCH Primary Sources through the skill of inductive logical learning, by means of comparing similar Case/Din rulings through ‘compare and contrast’ sharpened reasoning skills. A similar mussar Case/Din ירמיה ח:יג-יז. The דיוק learned from קידושין, from divorce, and the Torah curse of g’lut, these 3 Case/Din prophetic mussar add a layer of internal k’vanna to observance of ritual commandments. Herein this T’NaCH kabbalah frames the k’vanna of all tohor time-oriented Torah commandments, not limited only or specifically merely to the mitzva of קידושין.
תני האשה נקנית וניתני התם האיש קונה. מעיקא תני לישנא דאורייתא ולבסוף תני לישנא דרבנן. ומאי לישנא דרבנן דאמר לה אשה קנויה לעולם מהקדש וניתני הכא דאיש קינה משום דקא בעי למיתנא סיפא וקונה את אצמה
What does the language אשה קנויה לעולם מהקדש? This refers to the oath brit sworn between the pieces wherein HaShem cut a brit with Avram that his future born Cohen seed would number the stars in the heavens for multitude. Torah common law always learns by means of prior precedent rulings. Any attempt to read the Talmud, as if it existed as a common book of pleasurable reading, like fiction – utterly false.
The Talmud stands upon the mandate of the Torah as the working Constitution of the Republic. Upon this יסוד both the T’NaCH and Talmud stand as the Central Primary Sources which function as the basis by which the rabbis weave the culture and customs which the Cohen people wear like unto garments by which HaShem gave to Adam and Chava in the Garden. Just as the mitzva of קידושין represents a permanent status, so too and how much more so – the Torah as the Constitution of the Republic stands as a permanent status. However the perverse transformation of קידושין merely as a rabbinic commandment – set off a chain of consequences, like a rock thrown into a pond makes a ripple effect. Understanding קידושין limited only as a ritual rabbinic mitzva, this perversion changed the status of the Torah away from a Constitutional basic law document unto a religious law of ritual observances as codified in the assimilated statute law Shulkan Aruch. Torah common law bears no resemblance to assimilated statute law, any more than a bastard child born from adultery, resembles the profaned husband’s קידושין with his wife.
The Palestine State has been declared. The genocide has been declared. The Nazis running Israel have been labelled for what they are! Stop stealing land! Stop killing innocents!!
Idiot, a UN declaration does not mean squat to a Independent nation. Just ask Russia what it thinks about UN declarations calling for a cease fire in the Ukraine war. Holocaust denier you have a special relationship with Nazis as does your mother father and relatives.
Idiot. Following the UK’s recognition the other countries are falling in line. As of now, 147 of the 193 member states of the United Nations recognize the State of Palestine. You put yourself in good company with the likes of Russia and North Korea. Your Nazi government is after stealing more land and carrying out genocide. No morality. My father fought Nazis in Europe and I fight them whereever they are. Right now you and Hamas have a lot in common.
Pie in the sky bull shit. Israel agrees only to face to face negotiations with Arab countries. Idiot.
The UN participation in the Oct 7th massacre and the UN slander of Israeli genocide in Gaza has its consequences.
PM Netanyahu publicly supported the idea of annexing parts of the West Bank, particularly in the context of Trump’s peace plan. He viewed the plan as an opportunity to solidify Israeli claims to certain territories. While Netanyahu expressed support for annexation, he also made statements indicating that any moves would be contingent upon negotiations and the broader context of peace talks. He often framed the annexation as part of a larger strategy to ensure Israel’s security and sovereignty.
PM Netanyahu had to balance his support for annexation with the need to maintain relations with Arab leaders and the international community. He often emphasized that Israel would seek to maintain peace and stability in the region. In various speeches and interviews, Netanyahu reiterated his commitment to Israeli sovereignty over the West Bank while also acknowledging the importance of dialogue with Arab nations. Overall, PM Netanyahu’s response to President Trump, characterized by a mix of assertiveness regarding Israeli territorial claims and a diplomatic approach to maintain relations with Arab leaders, reflecting the complexities of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
PM Benjamin Netanyahu has expressed intentions to increase the population of Israeli settlements in Netanyahu’s government has consistently supported the expansion of settlements in Samaria. This plan aligns with his broader strategy to strengthen Israeli presence in the region; plans to build new housing units and infrastructure to accommodate a growing population. The push for settlement expansion has received backing from right-wing political factions within Israel, which view the settlements as a vital part of Israel’s security and historical claims to the land.
The goal to double the population in these settlements reflects a long-term vision to solidify Israeli claims to the territory and alter the demographic balance in the region. If President Trump and PM Netanyahu achieve a mass population transfer of all Gazans deported abroad to primarily other Arab countries. And the PA in Area A of the Oslo Accords continues its pay-4-slay policies. PM Netanyu has not excluded the possibility of making a mass population transfer of all Arabs in Areas A &B in Samaria to Gaza.
The idea of a mass population transfer of Gazans to other Arab countries, as well as the potential transfer of Arabs in Areas A and B of Samaria to Gaza, this legal opinion bases itself upon the precedent of the mass population transfer of Germans from the Czech Republic and Prussia. The latter territory awarded post WWII to both Poland and Russia. If the allies post WWII could make a population transfer of this nature and also England promoted a mass population transfer of Indian and Muslims from what became the two countries of India and Pakistan, then legally Israel has the right post Oct 7th, to likewise enforce a mass population transfer of dhimmi Arabs removed from Samaria to Gaza.
The Allied victor states justified the expulsion of Germans from various Eastern European countries as necessary for peace and stability. The partition of British India in 1947 led to one of the largest mass migrations in history, with millions of people moving across newly drawn borders based on religious identity. All Arab/Israeli Wars based upon Arab refusal to recognize the main Zionist opinion that Jews have equal rights to achieve self-determination in the Middle East. Therefore Israel has equal plans not to recognize the rights of Palestinians to achieve self-determination within the borders of the Jewish State.
The historical precedents mentioned above must apply equally straight across the board. Israel simple does not accept European hypocrisy over this issue. UN condemnation of Israel only proves that this worthless international gossip group merits no respect. The historical precedents mentioned above must apply equally straight across the board. Israel simple does not accept European hypocrisy over this issue.
NEVER AGAIN means that no European country or voting block shall ever again dictate Not the Shoah nor Auschwitz borders as expressed by the popular propaganda of the false UN 242 Two-State Solution dictate. Israel reminds the UN that this Resolution like 338, 446, and 2334 similar biased UN Resolutions – all resemble UN Resolution 3379: Zionism is Racism. Never Again means that no European state or coalition of States shall ever again dictate a “Two-State Solution” upon the Jewish people of Israel. That Peace between Arab and Israeli countries only achieved through direct face to face negotiations. Israel absolutely rejects the neutrality of the UN just as it likewise does England and France.
The problem we have is that Trump is a narcissistic, opinionated, fascist, ignorant imbecile and Netanyahu is a war criminal, ultra-right genocide merchant.
Your opinion of President Trump as treif as your opinion of Israel. Fuck YOU.
He’s a fucking Nazi!
Following the recent UN vote recognizing Palestine, met with a Israeli response of utter contempt: “F*CK YOU”. This UN Resolution, passed with 124 votes in favor, calling for Palestinian state recognition. Official recognition of Palestine; calls for a two-state solution.
Post Shoah, The Jewish People swore an oath: NEVER AGAIN. This oath cut among and between the Jewish People not exclusive to the Nazi Shoah; European dictates which attempts to determine the international borders of the Jewish state together with its Capital. The borders and Capital City of Israel not determined by some International committee. Israel not a UN Protectorate territory.
So the government mutated into the Nazis they detested!
Your 3rd person holier than thou bull shit stinks. Coward.
One day you will realise that murdering women and children is never right.
It’s you supporting murder, not me! Hamas was terrible but the response is worse.
Compare and Contrast Adult diplomacy from Juvenile UN theatre of justice. The recent “staged” walk-out by these defrocked European powers exemplifies their intent behind UN 242, to issue a Chapter VII “Ultimatum” to Israel rather than the deception lie of a Chapter VI “Suggestion” to Israel.
During the speech by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the UN General Assembly on September 26, 2025, a significant number of delegates walked out in protest. The following countries were among those whose representatives participated in the walkout:
France
United Kingdom
Canada
Australia
These countries had recently recognized a Palestinian state, which Netanyahu condemned during his speech, labeling such recognition as “disgraceful” and “insane.” The walkout was a clear demonstration of protest against his remarks regarding the ongoing conflict in Gaza and his rejection of Palestinian statehood.
President Trump announced that Arab and Muslim countries have committed to demilitarizing Gaza as part of a peace plan. Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu stated that if Hamas rejects the peace plan, Israel would proceed to “finish the job” of eliminating the threat posed by Hamas. The White House released a 20-point plan aimed at ending the conflict in Gaza, which includes various stipulations regarding hostages and governance. Netanyahu apologized to the Qatari Prime Minister for an Israeli airstrike that unintentionally killed a Qatari citizen during an operation targeting Hamas leaders. A senior Hamas official confirmed that the group will not disarm unless a fully sovereign Palestinian state is established, reiterating their stance on armed resistance as a right until then.
Donald Trump announced that several Arab and Muslim countries have agreed to a plan for demilitarizing Gaza as part of a broader peace initiative. Yet Europe throws a temper tantrum because Israel’s NEVER AGAIN means that Europe shall never dictate a Two-State “Final Solution” upon the people of Israel.
The two-state solution is a widely discussed approach to resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The genesis of this post 1967 6 Day War Israeli total military victory, the defrocked great powers of England and France – following their disastrous disgrace defeat in the 1956 Suez War and despite their proclaimed “Neutrality” prior to the June War – immediately sought to impose a cease fire upon Israel once it became clear of the total Arab defeat. Then their Chapter VI UN SC Resolution 242 attempted to rewrite recent history and pretend that Israel had not won the war and established its own international borders and Capital of Jerusalem consequent to this total victory.
Israelis argue that UN Resolution 242 passed to facilitate direct face to face negotiations between Arab countries at war with Israel. Yet, this blow-job walk-out proves that the EU does not honestly seek face to face direct negotiations but rather a committee of International Nations dividing Israel much like the Allies divided Germany and Berlin following the Great Patriotic War – Europe’s 2nd Civil War in the 20th Century.
Europe has now shown its empty poker-hand. European nations align themselves with the Arab vision which rejects Jewish equal rights to self-determination in the Middle East. The double-standard of EU politics exposes long standing European racism against the Jewish people – which culminated in the Shoah.
The walkout by European representatives during Netanyahu’s speech is viewed as a performative act rather than a genuine effort to engage in meaningful dialogue: the UN as a “theatre of justice,” where actions may be more about optics than substance. UN 242 as a Chapter VI suggestion functions only as a prop for direct face to face Arab Israeli negotiations, and not a substitute for this most basic requirement. Once Israel won its two War of National Independence, Israel in 1948 became an Independent nation and the League of Nations 1922 Palestine Mandate ceased to exist. The UN has no more of a role in the Iran Iraq war than it does with the Oct7th Hamas Israel war.
The Jewish state does not compare to defeated Nazi Germany where a coalitions of Nations divided that country into multiple parts. Russia and Poland currently “Occupy” Prussia, just as England “Occupies” Northern Ireland – to this very day!
ALL people require justice!!
Fat constipated Oaf-er. Europeans know nothing about justice.
The evidence is that you don’t – genocide supporter!!
Oaf-er you suffer from genocide on the brain.
same as the rest of the civilised world
Oaf-er your slander only exposes your criminal cowardice.
First get your head out of these right-wing shitheads like Oban and Meloni. All you digest is fascist shit. No wonder you support hate and genocide. You’re immersed it it!
You and your PM full of shit. Go let Macon fuck you in your faggot asses.
Not us starving kids!
Oaf-er dupe.
Child.
Noise from a fool.
UN – Must Israel insert this fact into your skull with bullets and bombs? Israel not a UN Protectorate territory. The UN does not dictate the international borders of the Jewish State. The UN nor Britian nor France dictates the Capital City of the Jewish State.
Never Again refers to the Nazi dictate “Final Solution”/Shoah. Hence 2334 Israel rejects any British French European dictate which replaces the Nazi “Final Solution” with the deception of a “Two State Solution”. Europe for ever barred from dictating any “Solution” to Israeli strategic interests determining its international borders or its Capital City which England and France declare as being Tel Aviv.
The European Nazi-like imperialism promotes revisionist history. 1. All Arab countries rejected the British proposed UN 181 Two State Resolution. Harping that the Two State Solution exist as the only path to achieve peace in the Middle East flagrantly lies. Never has the “Divide and Conquer” Two-State Solution ever worked.
Not in divided Germany/Berlin. Not in Korea or Vietnam. Not in India or Pakistan. Not in Iraq or Kuwait. NEVER WORKED – EVER. Hence the propaganda canard which the imperialist Nazi-like EU seeks to unilaterally impose upon Israel … to divide itself into two hostile States; Israel did that in 2005 in Gaza and Oct 7th 2023 the direct result. The current Gaza war, not the first Gaza/Israel war since 2005.
Avatar
John Neff
11m agotherealistjuggernaut.wordpress.com
Exactly. The world thinks they’re offering suggestions — but these “suggestions” are embedded with teeth. The lie of UN 242 has always been in the chapter mismatch. Chapter VI was the theater — Chapter VII was the script. What they called peace was always conditional surrender.
And that staged walkout? That wasn’t protest. That was the gavel dropping — the old imperial powers declaring that Jewish self-determination only counts when it’s compliant. France, Britain, Canada, Australia — each of them walked out not because of Gaza, but because Israel refuses to accept custodianship again.
Let’s be clear: “Two-state solution” isn’t diplomacy — it’s demographic euthanasia wrapped in international applause. And when Europe suggests “shared capital” in Jerusalem, what they really mean is court-appointed supervision of the one city we don’t negotiate.
The Shoah didn’t end at Auschwitz — it metastasized into committee votes, into peace plans designed to dilute Jewish sovereignty just enough to call it fair. But sovereignty isn’t charity — and it’s not on the table.
Let them walk out. Let them vote. Let them cry genocide while their own maps still bleed colonial borders. The oath of Never Again wasn’t just to memory — it was to jurisdiction. And we don’t kneel to ghosts who wrote the last warrant with ink made of ash.
We have become civilised. You have regressed to savagery!!
Oaf-er what a dumb ass.
I know enough to recognise genocide when I see it.
Your opinion does not amount to shit.
at least i don’t support war crimes
Oaf-er just shit
Yes – I shit on all fascists!!
cause you are full of shit – fascist!
Only one fascist in the house – YOU!!
projectionism. Ugly Oaf-er.
It’s like being back in the playground at infant’s school! Grow up!
Noise from a fool.
UN – Must Israel insert this fact into your skull with bullets and bombs? Israel not a UN Protectorate territory. The UN does not dictate the international borders of the Jewish State. The UN nor Britian nor France dictates the Capital City of the Jewish State.
Never Again refers to the Nazi dictate “Final Solution”/Shoah. Hence 2334 Israel rejects any British French European dictate which replaces the Nazi “Final Solution” with the deception of a “Two State Solution”. Europe for ever barred from dictating any “Solution” to Israeli strategic interests determining its international borders or its Capital City which England and France declare as being Tel Aviv.
The European Nazi-like imperialism promotes revisionist history. 1. All Arab countries rejected the British proposed UN 181 Two State Resolution. Harping that the Two State Solution exist as the only path to achieve peace in the Middle East flagrantly lies. Never has the “Divide and Conquer” Two-State Solution ever worked.
Not in divided Germany/Berlin. Not in Korea or Vietnam. Not in India or Pakistan. Not in Iraq or Kuwait. NEVER WORKED – EVER. Hence the propaganda canard which the imperialist Nazi-like EU seeks to unilaterally impose upon Israel … to divide itself into two hostile States; Israel did that in 2005 in Gaza and Oct 7th 2023 the direct result. The current Gaza war, not the first Gaza/Israel war since 2005.
Following the recent UN vote recognizing Palestine, met with a Israeli response of utter contempt: “F*CK YOU”. This UN Resolution, passed with 124 votes in favor, calling for Palestinian state recognition. Official recognition of Palestine; calls for a two-state solution.
Post Shoah, The Jewish People swore an oath: NEVER AGAIN. This oath cut among and between the Jewish People not exclusive to the Nazi Shoah; European dictates which attempts to determine the international borders of the Jewish state together with its Capital. The borders and Capital City of Israel not determined by some International committee. Israel not a British Resolution 181 UN Protectorate territory. All Arab countries rejected 181 in 1947. UN shove your revisionist history up where the Sun does not shine.
Hamas is evil – but so is genocide!
Dead pig you stink. Repeating genocide as a matra does not prove genocide through its repetition. Dumb ass.
Holocaust denier pig
Idiot. I’ve never denied. But you’re a genocide denier.
Cracked mirror vile scum, you equate the war in Gaza with the Shoah. Fuck YOU. 5 to 7 thousand people die every week in the Russian Ukraine war. YOU say nothing. Dead pig you stink.
There is never an excuse for murder!
Compare and Contrast Adult diplomacy from Juvenile UN theatre of justice. The recent “staged” walk-out by these defrocked European powers exemplifies their intent behind UN 242, to issue a Chapter VII “Ultimatum” to Israel rather than the deception lie of a Chapter VI “Suggestion” to Israel.
During the speech by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the UN General Assembly on September 26, 2025, a significant number of delegates walked out in protest. The following countries were among those whose representatives participated in the walkout:
France
United Kingdom
Canada
Australia
These countries had recently recognized a Palestinian state, which Netanyahu condemned during his speech, labeling such recognition as “disgraceful” and “insane.” The walkout was a clear demonstration of protest against his remarks regarding the ongoing conflict in Gaza and his rejection of Palestinian statehood.
President Trump announced that Arab and Muslim countries have committed to demilitarizing Gaza as part of a peace plan. Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu stated that if Hamas rejects the peace plan, Israel would proceed to “finish the job” of eliminating the threat posed by Hamas. The White House released a 20-point plan aimed at ending the conflict in Gaza, which includes various stipulations regarding hostages and governance. Netanyahu apologized to the Qatari Prime Minister for an Israeli airstrike that unintentionally killed a Qatari citizen during an operation targeting Hamas leaders. A senior Hamas official confirmed that the group will not disarm unless a fully sovereign Palestinian state is established, reiterating their stance on armed resistance as a right until then.
Donald Trump announced that several Arab and Muslim countries have agreed to a plan for demilitarizing Gaza as part of a broader peace initiative. Yet Europe throws a temper tantrum because Israel’s NEVER AGAIN means that Europe shall never dictate a Two-State “Final Solution” upon the people of Israel.
The two-state solution is a widely discussed approach to resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The genesis of this post 1967 6 Day War Israeli total military victory, the defrocked great powers of England and France – following their disastrous disgrace defeat in the 1956 Suez War and despite their proclaimed “Neutrality” prior to the June War – immediately sought to impose a cease fire upon Israel once it became clear of the total Arab defeat. Then their Chapter VI UN SC Resolution 242 attempted to rewrite recent history and pretend that Israel had not won the war and established its own international borders and Capital of Jerusalem consequent to this total victory.
Israelis argue that UN Resolution 242 passed to facilitate direct face to face negotiations between Arab countries at war with Israel. Yet, this blow-job walk-out proves that the EU does not honestly seek face to face direct negotiations but rather a committee of International Nations dividing Israel much like the Allies divided Germany and Berlin following the Great Patriotic War – Europe’s 2nd Civil War in the 20th Century.
Europe has now shown its empty poker-hand. European nations align themselves with the Arab vision which rejects Jewish equal rights to self-determination in the Middle East. The double-standard of EU politics exposes long standing European racism against the Jewish people – which culminated in the Shoah.
The walkout by European representatives during Netanyahu’s speech is viewed as a performative act rather than a genuine effort to engage in meaningful dialogue: the UN as a “theatre of justice,” where actions may be more about optics than substance. UN 242 as a Chapter VI suggestion functions only as a prop for direct face to face Arab Israeli negotiations, and not a substitute for this most basic requirement. Once Israel won its two War of National Independence, Israel in 1948 became an Independent nation and the League of Nations 1922 Palestine Mandate ceased to exist. The UN has no more of a role in the Iran Iraq war than it does with the Oct7th Hamas Israel war.
The Jewish state does not compare to defeated Nazi Germany where a coalitions of Nations divided that country into multiple parts. Russia and Poland currently “Occupy” Prussia, just as England “Occupies” Northern Ireland – to this very day!
The Middle East is for Arabs and Jews. They have to learn to live together!!
The Middle East is NOT for British or French. They do NOT determine the borders or Capital of Israel.
No but we can call out racist genocide!
Oaf-er your noise no one listens to.
really
Yes Oaf-er
More ultra-right fascist crap!
More dumb ass stupidity Oaf-er.
Common sense – obvious requires intelligence to understand.
Oaf-er dupe
How old are you?
Noise from a fool.
UN – Must Israel insert this fact into your skull with bullets and bombs? Israel not a UN Protectorate territory. The UN does not dictate the international borders of the Jewish State. The UN nor Britian nor France dictates the Capital City of the Jewish State.
Never Again refers to the Nazi dictate “Final Solution”/Shoah. Hence 2334 Israel rejects any British French European dictate which replaces the Nazi “Final Solution” with the deception of a “Two State Solution”. Europe for ever barred from dictating any “Solution” to Israeli strategic interests determining its international borders or its Capital City which England and France declare as being Tel Aviv.
The European Nazi-like imperialism promotes revisionist history. 1. All Arab countries rejected the British proposed UN 181 Two State Resolution. Harping that the Two State Solution exist as the only path to achieve peace in the Middle East flagrantly lies. Never has the “Divide and Conquer” Two-State Solution ever worked.
Not in divided Germany/Berlin. Not in Korea or Vietnam. Not in India or Pakistan. Not in Iraq or Kuwait. NEVER WORKED – EVER. Hence the propaganda canard which the imperialist Nazi-like EU seeks to unilaterally impose upon Israel … to divide itself into two hostile States; Israel did that in 2005 in Gaza and Oct 7th 2023 the direct result. The current Gaza war, not the first Gaza/Israel war since 2005.
Following decades of Federal Government absolute corrupts which defines Democrat and Republican regimes following the assassination of John F Kennedy … The divide is clear: the Trump administration views federal oversights as excessive and a barrier to efficiency, while Democratic leaders emphasize that federal employees are essential for governance and public service. The proposed significant layoffs create a scenario that would not only disrupt federal operations but also challenge the responsibility of state governments in managing increased bureaucratic functions. This conflict underscores deepening polarization around governance and the role of federal versus state authority in the U.S.
The Trump Administration starting with Doge argues for a reduction in federal bureaucracy, citing efficiency and a return to states’ rights. Democratic Leaders (e.g., AOC, Pelosi, Schiff): They oppose any drastic measures that would undermine federal authority and lead to job losses, arguing that federal employees are essential to maintaining order and services.
The latest Democrat Schumer Government budget Shutdown … threatens the jobs of some 750.000 Carpet Bagger Federal bureaucratic employees! NBC highlights panic within the government as certain federal functions cease. CNN opinion editorials focuses on the consequences of the shutdown, particularly the closure of federal services and impending layoffs.- Reports that Trump views the Schumer’s blunder shutdown, as an opportunity for budget cuts, igniting debate among lawmakers. CBS publicizes Trump’s absence in crucial meetings with Democratic leaders. This MSM yellow journalism rag opines the implications of a prolonged shutdown.
Trump quoted as seeing the shutdown as a strategic opportunity for significant budgetary changes, suggesting that the legacy media’s portrayal seeks to amplify tensions like it did with the Russia-gate hoax.
While “old” school Democratic leaders like Chuck Schumer express frustration over the lack of cooperation, framing the shutdown as detrimental to public services and government functionality, despite his refusal to support the Trump budget proposals. In the context of the ongoing government shutdown, major Democratic figures such as Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC), Nancy Pelosi, Adam Schiff, Jerry Nadler, and Maxine Waters have expressed various viewpoints.
AOC urges Republicans to come to her office for negotiations, emphasizing that she won’t tolerate cuts to essential services like insulin and chemotherapy. She challenged them to negotiate directly with her if they blamed her for the shutdown. Pelosi dismissed suggestions that AOC serves any leading role in negotiations; stating that Hakeem Jeffries directs the efforts to resolve the shutdown. She called the idea that AOC is orchestrating the situation “ridiculous.”
AOC has publicly extended an invitation to Republicans, framing the negotiation in a light that appeals to both urgency and accountability regarding essential services. This move positions her as a vocal advocate for citizens affected by the shutdown. While AOC has been active in public discourse, Pelosi has redirected the focus to actual party leadership. She emphasizes the collective effort under Jeffries, indicating a clear delineation of roles within Democratic ranks.
The reaction from prominent Democratic leaders like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC), Nancy Pelosi, Adam Schiff, Jerry Nadler, and Maxine Waters regarding the possibility of President Trump firing 750,000 federal employees, they realized with horror the Democratic caused budget crisis political disaster. Many Democrats argue that such mass layoffs would result in significant disruption not only for the federal workforce but also for communities that depend on federal services.
They emphasize that massive cuts in the Federal bureaucracies would harm vital public services. President Trump favors the Commerce Clause of the Constitution which validates States Rights to bureaucratically regulate all intra-State trade and commerce. Firing 750,000 Federal employees would force the States to assume the bureaucratic regulatory functions which post Civil War Washington “Carpet Bagger” bureaucrats arrogantly usurped as Washington’s Federal monopoly wherein the Central Government rules through direct management over the national economy.
Firing 750,000 federal employees would have substantial implications for how bureaucratic functions thereafter managed by Washington. States by definition would need to fill the regulatory vacuum left by the defunct federal government, leading to varied regulations across states and between States which would immediately undermine Federal established Corporate monopolies; and restore America back to a pre-Civil War States Rights agenda.
Such actions, most certainly would exacerbate tensions between state and federal governments, affecting legislative dynamics; possibly the restoration of State Legislatures Constitutional rights to appoint US Senators to Congress, which defined pre Civil War Congressional politics. Trump clearly favors a Jeffersonian/Jackson vision of State economic autonomy; rejects the Wilson Federal Reserve Central Bank together with FDR’s Keynesian Economics.
A significant policy shift aimed at balancing power between federal and state governments. The Trump Administration starting with Doge argues for a reduction in federal bureaucracy, citing efficiency and a return to states’ rights. Democratic Leaders (e.g., AOC, Pelosi, Schiff): They oppose drastic measures that would undermine post Civil War federal authority that results in mass Federal bureaucratic job losses. They argue maintaining the status quo; that federal employees are essential to maintaining order and services.
The latest Democrat Schumer Shutdown threatens the jobs of some 750.000 Carpet Bagger corrupt Federal bureaucratic employees. NBC – Describes the shutdown as a pivotal moment for Trump, who sees it as an opportunity for cuts; reports on Trump blaming Democratic senators for the funding failure. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez positions herself as a key figure in the negotiations, but emphasizes that Democratic leadership is guiding the strategy.
CNN – Coverage indicates that the shutdown is being used by Trump to advance his agenda of reducing federal bureaucracy. Its News rhetoric highlights concerns over the impact on services and the potential for job loss among federal employees.
CBS – Discusses the imminent threat of mass firings, and outlines the potential impacts on various federal agencies. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has become a focal point for Republicans trying to paint Democrats as extreme. However, she clarifies that the Democratic leadership is managing the shutdown response. Nancy Pelosi: Strongly criticizes the use of the shutdown for political leverage, emphasizing the importance of federal workers in providing essential services. Adam Schiff: Warns that mass layoffs would dramatically undermine federal capacity to address pressing issues and argues against a reduction of federal oversight. Jerry Nadler: Critiques the potential job losses, pointing out that federal employees play crucial roles in maintaining public services and upholding regulatory standards.
Maxine Waters: Likely to call for unity and a focus on getting the government running again, stressing the economic fallout from large-scale federal job losses. These Democratic leaders are concerned that Trump’s aggressive approach to reducing federal bureaucracy – threatened by mass firings would not just hurt federal employees but also disrupt essential services that many Americans rely on.
The term “Carpet Bagger” in this context refers to historical figures, reflecting a sentiment against corrupt centralized federal control monopoly of power over the post Civil War Confederat State governments stripped of these essential regulatory roles. The current situation, reflects significant polarization, with Democrats focusing on the necessity for federal employment and maintaining the bankrupt status quo order. While Trump’s administration views the current government shutdown as a vehicle for promoting their agenda of reduced governmental oversight and greater state autonomy which could expand the role of Doge placed upon steroids.
Republican incompetence and heartlessness.
Oaf -er shut up when you become an American or an Israeli then you can perhaps become human.
I’m English. Not that that is of importance. I am human.
Dream on your a pig just like your coward yellow bellied people.
I will thank you. I dream of getting rid of Nazi thugs and war criminals.
Wet dreams made by a coward pig.
Childish
Johnny foreigner Fuck YOU
Childish
Johnny Foreigner Fuck YOU
You deserve what you get.
Johnny Foreigner Fuck YOU
Johnny Foreigner, the hypocritical empire.
I’m not a foreigner!
pig your European and English – the definition of slut.
קידושין
____________________________________________
Chinese medicine argues that all disease originates in the gut. The object of this observation: The comparison to just how Justice similarly designated in Torah common law to remove human waste products.
Mercy under the terms of Jewish common law learns from the extermination commandment concerning the nations of Canaan, the eternal war against Amalek – interpreted as antisemitism, and the judicial Capital Crime killing of the minor stubborn and rebellious son. Mercy: the 4th middah of the Oral Torah spins around the Central Axis of the Torah oath brit: Blessing/Curse – ruling the land of Israel through just courts/enduring the judicial torture oppression where Par’o & Egypt functions as the model of all other Goyim legal systems; the Day vs. Night difference between Jewish Independence vs Jewish g’lut/exile in foreign alien kingdoms, dictatorships and democracies.
By stark and absolute contrast the value of Pity compared to that of Mercy. Pity, a shallow, immediate, emotional reactionary, feeling of empathy: directed toward any given situation, which arouses “pity” for the plight suffered by some other. Mercy when compared to pity, resembles constipation or worse some crippling gut related disease. Mercy not pity – defines the k’vanna of the Torah common law judicial system which compares to a healthy digestive track within the human body which efficiently removes bodily wastes.
The לא תעשה commandment to take no pity upon the nations of Canaan when Israel re-conquered a portion of our Homelands in 1948 and 1967, small wander that Arafat himself described his people as descendants from Canaanites! The 2nd Sinai לא תעשה commandment – Not to worship other Gods, understood/interpreted to mean 1) Do not assimilate to the customs and cultures which define the “Path” wherein the Goyim who reject the revelation of the Torah walk therein. 2) Do not intermarry with Goyim who reject the revelation of the Torah at Sinai.
This means that a Goy who seeks to become a Ger Tzeddick must accept the entire Torah revelation. Rambam’s fundamentalist beliefs which limited Torah commandments limited strictly to the language of the Written Torah, this most basic of fundamental errors shaped his the foreign assimilationist statute law vision of Talmudic halacha “converted the revolution to a counter revolution”.
Rambam’s statute law religious perversion compares to the Apostle Paul’s declaration that Goyim “not under the law” and that brit melah an archaic or antiquated religious notion. Immediately after Napoleon freed Jews from the Catholic Ghetto gulags, Reform leadership declared the halachot from the Statute law Shulkan Aruch, likewise – archaic or antiquated religious notions.
The Rambam did not have the least bit of a clue concerning the Torah priority of Av tohor time-oriented commandments. These commandments possess the power to elevate rabbinic mitzvot unto Torah commandments. Talmudic halacha enters an entirely different plane of reality and spirituality viewed from this entirely novel perspective. The Scopes Monkey Trial of 1925, which disputes fundamentalist vs science, this case compares to the contrast between how the Rambam understood Torah commandments, limited to merely תרי”ג Torah language, to that of the B’HaG’s vision that time-oriented Torah commandments, actually inclusive of all Talmumdic halachot – if learned through aggadic prophetic mussar as their k’vaana. The B’HaG reading of the Written Torah completely different from the Rambam/Church fundamental reading of the language of the Written Torah.
An example of this idea in context: The conflict between Nikolai Rykov and Leon Trotskii in the late 1920s, a significant moment in Soviet history. It contributed to Trotskii’s eventual exile. Trotskii the Co-founder of the Bolshevik October Revolution. He served as the leader, the architect of the Red Army during the White counter revolution.
Trotsky 2nd only to Lenin among Bolshevik leaders; he theorized the permanent revolution, which forced Stalin to develop primarily with the aid of the economic genius of Nikolai Bukharin, the counter theory of Socialism in One Country.
Stalin along with Troskii supported rapid industrialization and rural collectivization farming programs which negated Lenin’s New Economic Policy, which Rykov strongly supported. Trotsky criticized Rykov and the party leadership for their cautious approach, arguing it would hinder the revolution’s progress. Stalin craftly concealed his agreement with Troskii. In point of fact, Rykov gained rhetoric support from Stalin and other party leaders, in their group effort to marginalize Troskii.
Once the threat of Troskii removed, Stalin thereafter conducted his famous political theatre show trials, (Much like the UN SC and GA condemnations of Israel today) and removed the key pre-revolution and post revolution Bolshevik leaders through his infamous show trials. Stalin accused his political competition, all of whom competed to become the Dictator of the Proletariat, of becoming ”counter-revolutionaries”.
Lev Kamenev, one of the original Bolshevik leaders and a close associate of Lenin, executed in 1936. Grigory Zinoviev, head of the Petrograd Soviet and a prominent Bolshevik leader, executed in 1936. Mikhail Tomsky, leader of the trade unions and a prominent Bolshevik, committed suicide before trial in 1936. Nikolai Bukharin, editor of the Communist Party newspaper and the leading theorist of Socialism in One Country, executed in 1938. Alexei Rykov, Lenin’s successor as head of the Soviet government, executed in 1938.,
The purpose of justice, directly compares to the digestive system – it serves to remove Human wastes. And herein defines the Torah concept of faith as defined through the Sinai revelation. Stalin’s Show-Trials directly compare to Par’o ordering withholding of straw to Hebrew slaves!
The dedication, like a korban, of righteous justice among the Jewish people – most holy to HaShem. Herein defines the k’vanna of the mitzva of Moshiach. And the defining flaw of the House of David in the matter of Bat Sheva’s husband. Or more closer to home, the perversion of Rambam’s statute law halachic rulings which negated judicial courtroom common law, based upon legal precedents. Rabbinic courts today, a joke on par with the UN jester; the plurality of foreign states, as expressed through UN GA and SC Resolutions, does not determine the strategic national interests of any Independent nation – least of all Israel.
Previously, our Gemara of קידושין employed the Torah שמות יח verse: והודעת להם את הדרך ילכו בה. Our Gemara now makes a precedent Oral Torah research upon this Written Torah precedent which my on going commentary upon mesechta קידושין previously learned back to a similar precedent of the aggadic story which depicts the collapse of the Tower of Bavil United Nations world government.
The Torah verse: צדק צדק תרדוף, herein defines the purpose wherein Moshe took Israel out of Egyptian judicial oppression/slavery to conquer the land of Canaan. When a Man builds his chosen Cohen bnai brit family, he must by definition accept responsibility to wipe baby behinds and dispose of dirty diapers. Building a family functions as a microcosm of the National macrocosm pursuit of righteous justice through common law courts of jurisprudence governance/Legislative Review. Goyim courts do not have any reputation whatsoever of justice.
משנה זבים פרק ב — משנה ב בשבעה דרכים בודקין את הזב עד שלא נזקק לזיבה: במאכל, במשתה, ובמשא, בקפיצה, בחולי, ובמראה, ובהרהור הרהר עד שלא ראה, או שראה עד שלא הרהר רבי יהודה אומר, אפילו ראה בהמה חיה ועוף מתעסקין זה עם זה, אפילו ראה בגדי צבע האשה רבי עקיבא אומר, אפילו אכל כל מאכל בין רע בין יפה, ושתה כל משקה. אמרו לו, אין כאן זבין מעתה. אמר להם, אין אחריות זבים עליכם משנזקק לזיבה, אין בודקין אותו. אונסו וספיקו ושכבת זרעו טמאים, שרגלים לדבר. ראה ראיה ראשונה, בודקין אותו. בשניה, בודקין אותו. בשלישית, אין בודקין אותו. רבי אליעזר אומר, אף בשלישית בודקין אותו מפני הקרבן
[[In seven ways, a zav is examined before he is required to bring a sacrifice for his condition: through food, through drinking, through carrying, through jumping, through illness, through appearance, and through thought. If he thought about it before he saw, or if he saw before he thought, Rabbi Yehuda says: Even if he saw an animal, a wild beast, or a bird engaging with one another, or if he saw the garments of a woman, it is still a concern. Rabbi Akiva says: Even if he ate any food, whether bad or good, and drank any drink. They said to him, “There are no zavin here from now on.” He replied, “You are not responsible for the zavin once he is required to bring a sacrifice; you do not examine him.” If he was forced, or if there was a doubt, or if there was seminal discharge, he is impure, as it is a matter of concern. If he saw the first sighting, he is examined. In the second sighting, he is examined. In the third sighting, he is not examined. Rabbi Eliezer says: Even in the third sighting, he is examined because of the offering.]]
If a man experienced a zov-like discharge (similar in appearance to semen but distinct in halakhic status), the sages would “check” the circumstances. There are seven possible causes listed (food, drink, load-bearing, jumping, illness, sight, and thought). These are all natural or external causes that could trigger a discharge without it being a true halakhic zivah. Before he is halakhically established as a zav. That means: when he has only seen one or two emissions, he is still in the stage where we examine whether it might have been due to one of these external factors.
A man becomes a confirmed zav (זב גמור) only after three sightings. After one or two sightings, the Mishnah says we must “check” whether his discharge may be explained by one of these seven causes. If yes, it reduces the likelihood that this is true zav-status, and he would not become fully tamei as a zav. Once he has three emissions, he is “נזקק לזיבה” — halakhically confirmed — and we no longer check external causes. His status is established as zav regardless.
The Mishnah is distinguishing investigative procedure (דרכים) versus established precedent (נזקק). Before full establishment, the beit din (or examiner) works like a judge checking for possible causes of discharge other than zav — this is judicial inquiry. Once precedent is fixed (three emissions = zav), no circumstantial excuses are considered. “בודקין” = the court’s role in examining mitigating circumstances before judgment is sealed. “עד שלא נזקק לזיבה” = before the halakhic precedent locks the individual into a fixed legal status.
Our Gemara brings this Mishha as a precedent דכתיב דתנן בז’ דרכים בודקין את הזב. Our Gemara does not limit the subject matter to the specific mitzva of קידושין as the rabbinic statute law halachic commentaries erroneously assume. The Case of קידושין functions merely as a פרט within the larger (Big Picture) common law כלל. Its this fundamental point of distinction which separates Talmudic common law scholarship from Reshonim religious ritual law perversions.
The study of Torah common law actively makes subtle distinctions which translations of T’NaCH mussar common law and Talmudic halachic common law dismally fail to discern. Immediately after the ’29 Wall Street crash, the bureaucratic Federal Reserve, which has no accountability to the American people nor to Congress or the President for that matter, unilaterally decided to restrict the money supply by 1/3rd. This error duplicated the radical Republican post Civil War Congress which likewise restricted the ‘greenback’ money supply and established the class of ‘Robber Barons’.
The Great Depression witnessed a huge population transfer from rural private ownership farming class American to the cities. Yet no sane person compares FDR to Stalin’s collectivization programs which killed 1/3rd of Ukraine’s population due to starvation. None the less, FDR established farming monopolies which own and dominate American farming today. Stalin’s collectivization, as a matter of State policy, slaughtered the kulaks – independent farmers in rural USSR.
John Steinbeck’s novel “The Grapes of Wrath”, depicts the horrors of the Great Depression and the destruction of the American independent farming class. The policy of the Fed and FDR effectively uprooted and negated the 1862 Homestead Act which allowed individuals to claim and settle on parcels of land, typically 160 access, in exchange for a small fee and the requirement to improve the land by building a dwelling and cultivating crops.
The Talmud employs each specific mesechta of Gemara as a פרט to examine the כלל of Talmudic and T’NaCH common law – both of which learn by means of similar Case/Rule precedent comparative Cases. The Yeshiva education programs in Israel mirror the g’lut Torah education which limits the Torah to religious belief in a Monotheistic God which totally abandons the Torah faith: pursuit of righteous judicial justice among and between our conflicting people.
Its the judicial common law courts which permits Jews to remove wastes of fraud, lies, deceit, theft etc. Lacking an efficient waste management digestive system, this forces our people to resolve their disputes through Civil Wars.
Oh God!!
Oaf-er dupe.
It’s like being back in the playground at infant’s school! How old are you? Silly boy.
Noise from a fool.
UN – Must Israel insert this fact into your skull with bullets and bombs? Israel not a UN Protectorate territory. The UN does not dictate the international borders of the Jewish State. The UN nor Britian nor France dictates the Capital City of the Jewish State.
Never Again refers to the Nazi dictate “Final Solution”/Shoah. Hence 2334 Israel rejects any British French European dictate which replaces the Nazi “Final Solution” with the deception of a “Two State Solution”. Europe for ever barred from dictating any “Solution” to Israeli strategic interests determining its international borders or its Capital City which England and France declare as being Tel Aviv.
The European Nazi-like imperialism promotes revisionist history. 1. All Arab countries rejected the British proposed UN 181 Two State Resolution. Harping that the Two State Solution exist as the only path to achieve peace in the Middle East flagrantly lies. Never has the “Divide and Conquer” Two-State Solution ever worked.
Not in divided Germany/Berlin. Not in Korea or Vietnam. Not in India or Pakistan. Not in Iraq or Kuwait. NEVER WORKED – EVER. Hence the propaganda canard which the imperialist Nazi-like EU seeks to unilaterally impose upon Israel … to divide itself into two hostile States; Israel did that in 2005 in Gaza and Oct 7th 2023 the direct result. The current Gaza war, not the first Gaza/Israel war since 2005.
Yo idiot pig
Atrocities NEVER justify more atrocities!!
Oaf-er what a total dumb ass.
Netanyahu needs locking up as a war criminal!
First pull your head out off your ass Oaf-er
silly boy.
First pull your head out of your ass Oaf-er.
First get your head out of these right-wing shitheads like Oban and Meloni. All you digest is fascist shit. No wonder you support hate and genocide. You’re immersed it it!
Oban? Who the fuck is that. Meloni? The PM of Italy? Dude you are so full of shit.
Viktor Orban – far right President of Austria! Meloni fascist President of Italy!
Fall EU Fall!
Imbecile
Noise from a fool.
UN – Must Israel insert this fact into your skull with bullets and bombs? Israel not a UN Protectorate territory. The UN does not dictate the international borders of the Jewish State. The UN nor Britian nor France dictates the Capital City of the Jewish State.
Never Again refers to the Nazi dictate “Final Solution”/Shoah. Hence 2334 Israel rejects any British French European dictate which replaces the Nazi “Final Solution” with the deception of a “Two State Solution”. Europe for ever barred from dictating any “Solution” to Israeli strategic interests determining its international borders or its Capital City which England and France declare as being Tel Aviv.
The European Nazi-like imperialism promotes revisionist history. 1. All Arab countries rejected the British proposed UN 181 Two State Resolution. Harping that the Two State Solution exist as the only path to achieve peace in the Middle East flagrantly lies. Never has the “Divide and Conquer” Two-State Solution ever worked.
Not in divided Germany/Berlin. Not in Korea or Vietnam. Not in India or Pakistan. Not in Iraq or Kuwait. NEVER WORKED – EVER. Hence the propaganda canard which the imperialist Nazi-like EU seeks to unilaterally impose upon Israel … to divide itself into two hostile States; Israel did that in 2005 in Gaza and Oct 7th 2023 the direct result. The current Gaza war, not the first Gaza/Israel war since 2005.
The k’vanna of Yom Kippur
Yom Kippur a yahrzeit which “remembers” the Avot; the oaths they swore to create time-oriented commandments which create from nothing the Chosen Cohen people. A ger tzeddik a life created from nothing. ברת נידוי imposed upon a wicked Jew who refuses to give his ex wife her “get”, also a new creation in the opposite direction — no longer Jewish therefore the Court can issue a “Get” to the ex-Wife b/c the kiddushin of the marriage invalid retroactively!
HaShem made a vow to Moshe and in the process forgot the oaths sworn to the Avot which create from nothing the chosen Cohen people through the holiness of tohor time oriented commandments – the substance of the entire Book of בראשית. The creation stories spin around “time”. Moshe cause HaShem to “remember” the oaths sworn to the Avot wherein HaShem creates the chosen Cohen people from nothing. Sarah, a 90 year old woman had long since aged past child bearing age! Hence the k’vanna of Yom Kippur – remembering the yahrzeit of the Avot; herein remembers the t’shuva made by HaShem wherein HaShem annulled his vow to make of the seed of Moshe the chosen Cohen people.
Chosen – piffle!!
sub human shit.
Mirror mirror
Yellow belly
Kindergarten shit.
coward pig
silliness
Johnny foreigner Fuck YOU
Childish
Johnny Foreigner Fuck YOU
Supporter of Genocide
Johnny Foreigner Fuck YOU
Johnny Foreigner piece of shit. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bdb-_ho6ni8
Trump’s secret weapon was to let Netanyahu and his Nazis off the leash.
Fuck YOU Johnny Foreigner.
That’s Nazi for you!!
Nazi a psycho European and British inherited mental disease. Johnny Foreigner.
Gaza is experiencing a severe humanitarian crisis due to ongoing military conflict, with over 60,000 Palestinians killed and widespread destruction of infrastructure since the war began on October 7, 2023.
It was attacked by Nazis!
Bull.
That’s why the Nazis keep the media out so they can commit their war crimes – crimes you support!! It’s Nazi in action!
Johnny Foreigner Fuck YOU.
Genocide is not pleasant. What should we call supporters of genocide?
War Porn addicts besides being Johnny Foreigner bloat pigs who can’t get it up. Their ignorance totally puke disgusting.
war monger
War Porn addict – what a total loser Johnny Foreigner.
Torah Courts maintained through Legal Insurance.
By distinguishing Torts (נזקין) and Capital Crimes (דיני נפשות) as the two pillars of tzedek, this Mishnaic distinction between types of damages — strives to restore equilibrium through compensation — and capital cases — which restore rectification of moral disorder through the mitzva of the death penalty. Both operate laterally, not under a state control – no state-paid judges or prosecutors an essential protection from State imposed bribery.
Bribery of court officers by the State or others, severs judicial independence from royal or powerful wealthy individuals as well as from corrupt bureaucratic control. Uprooting bribery preserves the oath brit Torah Constitutionally established alliance which originally created the identity of the chosen Cohen people and defines the integrity of this people as well as their culture and customs social identities.
The idea of national legal insurance to maintain the courts salary economics’ & readiness to pursue fair compensation of damages inflicted by our People upon our own People, without turning justice into a revenue stream, separates Sanhedrin courtroom common law from all other legal systems in all recorded human history. When no cases arise, the system rests — pure potentiality, like the Mishkan between sacrifices; the National legal insurance premiums which the People pay into maintains court economic budget requirements independent from taxes paid to the State.
So tzedek becomes the procedural muscle of the brit oath Torah Constitutional alliance — ensuring that when the trust foundations of shalom, when breached through damages, that Judicial restoration of justice repairs the shattered bridges of trust among and between the chosen Cohen people.
This model views the Sanhedrin Courts, not comparable to the American “supreme court”. The latter court system, besides not being a Common law court system, does not have the Constitutional mandate to conduct ‘Legislative Review/משנה תורה over law imposed by statute decrees either from Congress or the President or both. Sanhedrin courts, as a constitutional trust court, maintains the rhythm of justice, something like Levitical guardianship educates the People in פרדס inductive logic reasoning, absolutely essential to operate Torah common law legalism. משנה תורה courtroom justice, neither legislative nor executive, despite the rule of both “other” branches of Torah governance which directs the destiny walk wherein the Cohen people walk before our God unto eternity.
crap
Noise from Johnny Foreigner.
Blood Libels defines the Yatzir Ha’Raw spirits within the hearts of all Goyim throughout the generations. Post the Oct 7th Abomination massacre by Hamas, almost immediately came the blood libel slander of “Genocide”. But post the ’67 War the blood libel revisionist history introduced by both Britain and France: the 242 declaration that peace only achievable in the Middle East through a UN “internatioanal law” dictate upon Israel!
The semantic shift in the phrase “territoires occupés” between 1964 and post-1967 UN usage exposes the deliberate retroactive redefinition that Arab and European diplomats engineered after the Six-Day War. The Palestine National Covenant (1964)—ratified three years before 242—defines “Palestine” as the “occupied” land within the British Mandate borders, excluding the West Bank (then under Jordanian sovereignty) and Gaza (under Egyptian control).
Weigh now the hostile blood libel language of “the” French UN 242 post war revisionist history. The French official text uses “des territoires occupés” — which in French usage is normally read as “from “the” occupied territories” (i.e., with “the” definite sense). That phrasing more naturally supports the French holier than thou, reading that Israel should withdraw from the territories (the entirety of those occupied in 1948! The French wording and the preamble’s “inadmissibility of acquisition of territory by war” buttress an interpretation that envisages full withdrawal, which includes even West Jerusalem! Recall the Vatican demanded in 1947 the Jerusalem exist as an Internationally ruled City, similar to Post WWII Berlin. Many continental and Arab states, and many subsequent UN framings, preferred this reading.
The French text gave political cover to states and blocs pressing for “the” full Israeli withdrawal from “48 occupied territories”; the English text gave the drafters (Caradon, Goldberg et al.) a way to frame 242 as a negotiating framework rather than an immediate, absolute mandate for total withdrawal from ’67 “recaptured territories”. A fundamental presumption by both London and Paris. Both versions fundamentally err. Israel simply not a UN protectorate territory wherein the UN determines its borders like as attempted by the Peel Commission. Britain and France, nor any other UN Security Council States, determine the international borders of Israel. And how much more so the Capital City of Israel. Yet these hostile states promote revisionist history and refuse to recognize Jerusalem as the Capital of Israel! Both versions of UN 242 an utter fraud.
Hence the distinction between the British and French versions of 242 represents a Good Cop vs. Bad Cop propaganda rhetoric to justify the dismantling of Zionism’s pre WWI platform that Jews have equal rights to achieve self-determination in the Middle East. All Arab Israeli Wars ever fought, including the Oct 7th Abomination War reflects the Blood Libel Racism spirits which breaths within the Yatzir Ha’Raw hearts of all Goyim – both Arab/Muslims and European/Russians.
Stupidity!!
Johnny Foreigner pretends his opinion amounts to something other than shit.
Pig
Megalomania
The k’vanna of Yom Kippur
Yom Kippur a yahrzeit which “remembers” the Avot; the oaths they swore to create time-oriented commandments which create from nothing the Chosen Cohen people. A ger tzeddik a life created from nothing. ברת נידוי imposed upon a wicked Jew who refuses to give his ex wife her “get”, also a new creation in the opposite direction — no longer Jewish therefore the Court can issue a “Get” to the ex-Wife b/c the kiddushin of the marriage invalid retroactively!
HaShem made a vow to Moshe and in the process forgot the oaths sworn to the Avot which create from nothing the chosen Cohen people through the holiness of tohor time oriented commandments – the substance of the entire Book of בראשית. The creation stories spin around “time”. Moshe cause HaShem to “remember” the oaths sworn to the Avot wherein HaShem creates the chosen Cohen people from nothing. Sarah, a 90 year old woman had long since aged past child bearing age! Hence the k’vanna of Yom Kippur – remembering the yahrzeit of the Avot; herein remembers the t’shuva made by HaShem wherein HaShem annulled his vow to make of the seed of Moshe the chosen Cohen people.
The Talmud teaches that an oath/blessing requires שם ומלכות. מ ל ך יש אותו שרש של מלאך. The tefillah of both ר”ה ויו”כ emphasizes an example of the tohor Oral Torah middah חנון. This general middah contrasts with the specific middah of רחום. In previous posts distinguished רחום from חוס\pity. This broad middah defined through terms such as חיים, מחל,מחה, תטהר, טוב, שמחה, as well as the later tohor middot ארך טפים ורב חסד ואמת. Obviously these Torah Oral Torah middot hold a depth in their own right. However חנון rests as their crown.
In the 2nd kre’a shma blessing in both morning and evening blessings (acceptance of Torah brit curses at night and Torah blessings at morning. Acceptance of the yoke of the kingdom of Heaven.), this blessing extols mitzvot. Elevating תולדות קום ועשה מצוות לטהור זמן גרמא אב מצוות breathes the spirit of חיים and elevates the dedication of tohor middot from מלך unto מלאך! Yaacov sent a מלאך to great his brother Esau which came to attack Yaacov as the Head of an Army. HaShem sent Moshe as a מלאך to Egypt to judge the Gods of that land.
The yahrzeit of Yom Kippur, Israel remembers the oaths sworn by the Avot whereby they cut an oath brit alliance to create יש מאין the chosen Cohen people throughout the generations by means of the sanctification of tohor time-oriented Av Torah commandments. This Av commandment dedicates as מלך tohor middot revealed to Moshe at Horev. Through tefillah which requires swearing a Torah oath through the Yatzir Ha’Tov within the heart. Israel adores observance of mitzvot because the sanctification of this holiness makes an aliyah of מלך raised to the level of מלאך, which Israel sends as our ambassador to cause HaShem to remember the oaths which HaShem swore to the Avot to create the chosen Cohen people יש מאין. Herein Jews remember the day of Atonement where HaShem remembers the oaths sworn to the Avot as an eternal brit faith of love.
More stuff
Yellow belly
More playground childishness.
coward pig
Hamas carried out a terrible atrocity against random Jewish people. They slaughtered and took hostages in an horrendous act of terrorism.
The Israeli response was to bomb, shoot and starve civilian Palestinians. To destroy their homes and livelihood in an act of genocide!
Both disgust me!!
Johnny foreigner Fuck YOU
Childish
Johnny Foreigner Fuck YOU
Grow up
Johnny Foreigner Fuck YOU
Fuck Head Johnny Foreigner https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0poA6dDjjPs
You go believing ultra-right nutcases and their rhetoric!
I do not believe you. You’re the only ultra-right nutcase who vomits continuously rhetoric hate propaganda.
LOL – can’t you read??
Nazi a psycho European and British inherited mental disease. Johnny Foreigner.
‘Unimaginable horrors’: more than 50,000 children reportedly killed or injured in the Gaza Strip
Statement by UNICEF Regional Director for the Middle East and North Africa, Edouard Beigbeder
You barbaric Nazi supporter of genocide!
Bull. Fuck your inflated propaganda UN figures based upon Hamas reports!
I watch the pictures of what is going on. Barbaric, cruel genocide!!
You watch pictures. Wow so profound… NOT. Johnny Foreigner Fuck YOU.
https://palestine.un.org/sites/default/files/styles/hero_header_2xl_1x/public/2024-03/image1170x530cropped_1.jpg?itok=-uvhE4fr
This is what genocide looks like!
War Porn addict – what a total loser Johnny Foreigner.
racist nazi
War Porn addict – what a total loser Johnny Foreigner.
You’re the war lover. I want peace and a lasting solution.
What you want does not interest me nor matters.
Johnny Foreigner pig
genocide supporter
Johnny Foreigner spews shit.
Don’t talk about yourself that way Moshe. I’m sure you have many redeeming faults.
Johnny Foreigner spews shit.
Blood Libels defines the Yatzir Ha’Raw spirits within the hearts of all Goyim throughout the generations. Post the Oct 7th Abomination massacre by Hamas, almost immediately came the blood libel slander of “Genocide”. But post the ’67 War the blood libel revisionist history introduced by both Britain and France: the 242 declaration that peace only achievable in the Middle East through a UN “internatioanal law” dictate upon Israel!
The semantic shift in the phrase “territoires occupés” between 1964 and post-1967 UN usage exposes the deliberate retroactive redefinition that Arab and European diplomats engineered after the Six-Day War. The Palestine National Covenant (1964)—ratified three years before 242—defines “Palestine” as the “occupied” land within the British Mandate borders, excluding the West Bank (then under Jordanian sovereignty) and Gaza (under Egyptian control).
Weigh now the hostile blood libel language of “the” French UN 242 post war revisionist history. The French official text uses “des territoires occupés” — which in French usage is normally read as “from “the” occupied territories” (i.e., with “the” definite sense). That phrasing more naturally supports the French holier than thou, reading that Israel should withdraw from the territories (the entirety of those occupied in 1948! The French wording and the preamble’s “inadmissibility of acquisition of territory by war” buttress an interpretation that envisages full withdrawal, which includes even West Jerusalem! Recall the Vatican demanded in 1947 the Jerusalem exist as an Internationally ruled City, similar to Post WWII Berlin. Many continental and Arab states, and many subsequent UN framings, preferred this reading.
The French text gave political cover to states and blocs pressing for “the” full Israeli withdrawal from “48 occupied territories”; the English text gave the drafters (Caradon, Goldberg et al.) a way to frame 242 as a negotiating framework rather than an immediate, absolute mandate for total withdrawal from ’67 “recaptured territories”. A fundamental presumption by both London and Paris. Both versions fundamentally err. Israel simply not a UN protectorate territory wherein the UN determines its borders like as attempted by the Peel Commission. Britain and France, nor any other UN Security Council States, determine the international borders of Israel. And how much more so the Capital City of Israel. Yet these hostile states promote revisionist history and refuse to recognize Jerusalem as the Capital of Israel! Both versions of UN 242 an utter fraud.
Hence the distinction between the British and French versions of 242 represents a Good Cop vs. Bad Cop propaganda rhetoric to justify the dismantling of Zionism’s pre WWI platform that Jews have equal rights to achieve self-determination in the Middle East. All Arab Israeli Wars ever fought, including the Oct 7th Abomination War reflects the Blood Libel Racism spirits which breaths within the Yatzir Ha’Raw hearts of all Goyim – both Arab/Muslims and European/Russians.
all people are humans – good and bad. looks like you’re one of the racist fascists.
Johnny Foreigner publicly fucks his dead mother and declares that such behavior qualifies as “human”.
LOL illiterate racist fool!
This mother fucker jacks off in public … again.
A quick summation of the Yom Kippur dedication of the Divine Soul Name אלהים to the Shemene Ezeret dedication of the Divine Soul Name איש האלהים.
מלכים ב ו:טז-יז. Elisha when surrounded by Syrian soldiers, his servant expressed great fear. Elisha reassured him by saying that more stood with them than with the Syrians. He then davvened for his servant’s eyes acknowledge the new creation consequence of the prophet’s tohor time-oriented commandment, great numbers of heavenly army of angels surrounding them, causing the Syrian soldiers to flee in panic.
What defines the k’vanna of the נעילה תפלה in the Yom Kippur מחזור? Contrast this question to Shemene Ezeret where Yidden complete the reading of the Torah and start the Book of בראשית. How does the Torah reveal prophesy? An incredibly basic fundamental question, which neither the NT nor Koran ever asked. The latter av tumah avoda zarah religious abominations pervert prophesy to witchcraft; Bil’aam predicted the future.
Prophets, starting with Moshe Rabbeinu’s Torah command mussar – the NaCH Books of the Prophets do not pretend to for-see future events, which defines how the NT and Koran Protocols of the Elders of Zion hoax forgeries understand prophesy. This error every bit as big as “Theological Monotheism” – belief in some Universal One God.
The Talmud clearly instructs that HaShem offered the Torah revelation to both Esau and Yishmael. Both inquired to its contents which commanded not to murder or steal. Only the 12 tribes of Israel therefore stood at Sinai and accepted the Torah. Hence 1. assimilation and 2. intermarriage, both these critical Torah precedents/בניני אבות defines the k’vanna of the 2nd Sinai commandment negative commandment not to worship foreign gods; how this negative commandment כללי understands/מאי נפקא מינא the Av time oriented-first Sinai commandment.
The 2nd Sinai commandment משנה תורה\common law precedent defines the revelation of Torah common law revelation at Sinai which only the Tribes of Israel accepted making HaShem a tribal god of the chosen Cohen People. Contrast the Hadith being sayings of Muhammad exists as statute law rather than common law.
Statute law based upon legal authority figures like government officials. Common law compares similar courtroom rulings made by different courts of common law. Therefore, Hadith qualifies as legislative statute law, something like a law passed by the British Parliament rather than judicial common law which have a Constitutional Torah mandate to regulate all Legislative statute laws through the process of Legislative review known in the second name of the Book of דברים as משנה תורה/judicial common law.
Moshe Rabbeinu’s father-in-law/Yitro first advised Moshe how to ruling his people throughout the generation through the establishment of common law courtrooms which have the Torah constitutional mandate to regulate all statute law passed by any other branch of the Federal Government. The 12 Tribes of Israel established the first Republic when the prophet Yehoshua conquered Canaan.
The Torah includes both statute-like commandments (mitzvot) and legal precedents (case laws) that function similarly to common law. Mitzvot as statute-like commandments, both positive and negative mitzvot — do not require k’vanna. K’vanna defined as the dedication of tohor Oral Torah Horev revelation middot, affixed מקום קבוע to Torah mitzvot and Talmudic halachot; specifically, the rabbinic mitzva of tefillat Shemone Esrei. Herein defines the basis of dedicating Divine Names for the souls/life dedicated while standing before a Sefer Torah and swearing a Torah oath/blessing. (Blessings exist as תולדות to Torah oaths based upon the 2nd tier תולדות מצוות in their relationship with Av tohor time-oriented commandments – תמיד מעשה בראשית.)
In the specific case of Av kre’a shma tefillah to תולדות Shemone Esrei tefillah, the שחרית first blessing to the קריא שמע address the k’vanna of Av tohor time-oriented commandments through the twice repeated רמז term תמיד מעשה בראשית. The four part פרדס inductive reasoning kabbala of Oral Torah does not recognize as particularly significant worshipping words printed in either the T’NaCH Talmud or the Siddur.
This opening kre’a shma blessing/oath\, made for example by and through tefillen, either Rashi or Rabbeinu Tam, or mixing part of one with part of the other, which permits larger tefillen boxes. This latter sh’itta helps to understand the מחלוכת concerning when to say תפילה דאורייתא ערבית between Rashi and Rabbeinu Tam. This dispute likewise explains how rabbi Yeshua could answer the ערבית תפילה could exist as both חיוב ורשות as one Torah commandment!
רשות commandments traditionally misinterpreted as “optional”. The rabbis, in the case of women placing tefillen, a tohor time-oriented commandment, as optional – meaning secondary, having a lower level of holiness. Rabbi Yehoshua one of the instructors of rabbi Akiva, he did not recognize this false טיפש פשט. Herein we reach the Order of תפלה נעילה on Yom Kippur. The dedication of the Divine Chyyah soul name אלהים.
Have reached a מאי נפקא מינא – “gee I could have had a V-8″ moment. Rabbeinu Tam rules the halacha poskined from the opening Av Mishna of ברכות, permissible to dav-ven תפילת ערבית at פלג המנחה while the Sun remains visible in the sky. Tefillen traditionally limited to a day-light Torah commandment. Consequently, a person can reverse the mixture of Rashi/Rabbeinu Tam tefillens placed during the שחרית קריא שמע דאורייתא תפילה. That person has the רשות to then dav’ven the קריא שמע ערבית תפילה דאורייתא with the intention to affix this kre’a shma to his נעילה תפלת דרבנן שמונה עשרה. As a consequence this person dav’vens both שחרית וערבית with tefillen!
Tefillen as a mitzva permits a person to swear a Torah oath. The Gemara of Sanhedrin learns that sworn false oaths caused the floods in the days of Noach. Yom Kippur remembers the t’shuva made by HaShem wherein HaShem annulled the vow to make of the seed of Moshe the chosen Cohen people. Possible to annul a vow, not so a Torah oath!
Herein we can understand the holiness of the repetition of the Shemone Esrei wherein the Angels declare Holy Holy Holy. What defines the Torah concept of Angels? Clearly the Koran does not have the slightest clue. Proof that Muhammad a false prophet. Angels created through swearing Torah oath which require שם ומלכות. Kingship gives a direction taken by a people through the leadership of the king himself. Impossible to define a term using the identical term!
Kingship in this context therefore refers to the dedication of some specific Oral Torah tohor spirit revealed first to Moshe at Horev – 40 days after the sin of the Golden Calf on Yom Kippur. What does this Oral Torah dedicated through swearing a Torah oath create? Answer – Angels. The Torah תפילה דאורייתא תפילה – קריא שמע accepts the yoke of the kingdom of heaven upon the oath created Angels – created through the sworn שם ומלכות שבועה. Herein distinguishes a Torah blessing from a Torah praise. The latter expressed through saying Tehillem prayers. Grasping such subtle distinctions defines רב חסד-מאי נפקא מינא.
Shemene Ezeret dedication of the Divine Soul Name איש האלהים, the k’vanna of this closing 4th Torah Chag, to dedicate the k’vanna of HaShem as KING over the Angels created through swearing Av tohor time-oriented Torah commandments תמיד מעשה בראשית.
The Torah opens with the Divine Soul name אלהים rather than the שם השם לשמה first revealed in the opening Sinai Torah commandment. Why? The Chosen First Born Cohen People yet created through observance of tohor Av time-oriented commandments. Hence the Torah opens by describing the world as chaos and anarchy as depicted through the oppression of giants who raped women, the building of the Tower of Bavil, and the destruction of the cities of Sodom.
This point of distinction separates the mitzva of Amalek told in שמות from the mitzva of Amalek told in דברים. A clear example of the Book of the Torah teaching prophetic mussar through משנה תורה common law legalism. D’varim introduces that the Jewish ערב רב — אין להם יראת אלהים.
ערב רב שיצאו ממזרים אין להם יראת אלהים as told in the mitzva to remember the eternal war against Amalek one shabbat prior to Purim, the custom to read this Torah passage. The mussar of דאורייתא Chag Purim places the essence of the commandment concerning Amalek upon the Jewish people not to become an Av tumah avoda zara which assimilates and intermarries with Goyim. Anti-Semitism defines the eternal war against Amalek. This eternal war an internal Civil War against Jews who worship Av tumah avoda zarah.
The Divine Names function as oath soul Names of the chosen Cohen people in the image of HaShem. The closing Chag of Shemene Ezeret actively entails remembering, based upon ר”ה יום הזכרון. Man lives and dies by the Angels or demons which tohor vs tuma middot continually create תמיד מעשה בראשית. This judicial revelation (משנה תורה) forms the soul of prophecy and defines Torah’s political-legal distinction from every other system.
Hrrrrrrmmmmppphhhh
Poor Johnny Foreigner illiterate fool.
LOL!! Is that the best you can do?? I’ve written more books than you’ve read! You do amuse me!
Noise
At least you managed to spell that right. Now work up to a sentence. When we’ve got the hang of that we’ll try paragraphs. Who knows? There’s always hope.
Oaf-er = Johnny Foreigner
Blood Libels defines the Yatzir Ha’Raw spirits within the hearts of all Goyim throughout the generations. Post the Oct 7th Abomination massacre by Hamas, almost immediately came the blood libel slander of “Genocide”. But post the ’67 War the blood libel revisionist history introduced by both Britain and France: the 242 declaration that peace only achievable in the Middle East through a UN “internatioanal law” dictate upon Israel!
The semantic shift in the phrase “territoires occupés” between 1964 and post-1967 UN usage exposes the deliberate retroactive redefinition that Arab and European diplomats engineered after the Six-Day War. The Palestine National Covenant (1964)—ratified three years before 242—defines “Palestine” as the “occupied” land within the British Mandate borders, excluding the West Bank (then under Jordanian sovereignty) and Gaza (under Egyptian control).
Weigh now the hostile blood libel language of “the” French UN 242 post war revisionist history. The French official text uses “des territoires occupés” — which in French usage is normally read as “from “the” occupied territories” (i.e., with “the” definite sense). That phrasing more naturally supports the French holier than thou, reading that Israel should withdraw from the territories (the entirety of those occupied in 1948! The French wording and the preamble’s “inadmissibility of acquisition of territory by war” buttress an interpretation that envisages full withdrawal, which includes even West Jerusalem! Recall the Vatican demanded in 1947 the Jerusalem exist as an Internationally ruled City, similar to Post WWII Berlin. Many continental and Arab states, and many subsequent UN framings, preferred this reading.
The French text gave political cover to states and blocs pressing for “the” full Israeli withdrawal from “48 occupied territories”; the English text gave the drafters (Caradon, Goldberg et al.) a way to frame 242 as a negotiating framework rather than an immediate, absolute mandate for total withdrawal from ’67 “recaptured territories”. A fundamental presumption by both London and Paris. Both versions fundamentally err. Israel simply not a UN protectorate territory wherein the UN determines its borders like as attempted by the Peel Commission. Britain and France, nor any other UN Security Council States, determine the international borders of Israel. And how much more so the Capital City of Israel. Yet these hostile states promote revisionist history and refuse to recognize Jerusalem as the Capital of Israel! Both versions of UN 242 an utter fraud.
Hence the distinction between the British and French versions of 242 represents a Good Cop vs. Bad Cop propaganda rhetoric to justify the dismantling of Zionism’s pre WWI platform that Jews have equal rights to achieve self-determination in the Middle East. All Arab Israeli Wars ever fought, including the Oct 7th Abomination War reflects the Blood Libel Racism spirits which breaths within the Yatzir Ha’Raw hearts of all Goyim – both Arab/Muslims and European/Russians.
there is no such thing – racist crap.
Johnny Foreigner his head so far up his faggot butt that he declares Sergeant Shultz: “I see nothing! NOTHING.
LOL illiterate racist fool!
This mother fucker jacks off in public … again.
Understanding the Genius of the opening Parsha of the Book of בראשית.
The study of ancient texts truly requires rudimentary knowledge of the Hebrew language. Reliance upon sophomoric biblical translations compares to a screen door on a submarine.
בראשית ברא אלהים … בקדמין ברא יי.
Targum אונקלוס translated אלהים as שם השם. Why? If the foundation cracked, the entire building must come down! The kabbalah of פרדס logic makes no Xtian dogmatic reading of בראשית jailed to “In the beginning”. Such Xtian avoda zarah expresses an Av tumah spirit which defiles as does a dead body in a tent! The concept of רמז – words within words.
ב’ ראשית … ראש בית … ברית אש words within the word בראשית. Would you give your new born first born child to suckle straight from a sow pig? In the 9th chapter of ברכות rabbi Yechuda interprets בכל לבבך\כם בקריא שמע as serving HaShem with both your Yatzirot tohor vs tuma spirits, which reside in our hearts throughout the generations. The בנין אב\precedent/ wherein rabbi Yechuda introduced this Mishnaic \precedent/ … ב’ ראשית from the opening word of the Torah; two Creation stories comparable to the two opposing Trees in the Garden. A central theme therein introduced from the start.
Actions have consequences. The Talmud refers to this reality as ירידות הדורות which implies “domino effect or ripple effect”. A great leader makes a decision and all later down-stream generations suffer the consequences! King Shlomo erred and understood בית המקדש as copying the ways of Goyim who build grand Cathedrals and Temples! King Shlomo ignored the council that the prophet Natan gave David just as did Rehoboam ignored the elder councilors of king Shlomo!
Measure for measure. King Shlomo failed to establish judicial Sanhedrin common law courts as the בראשית of his kingdom! Like Par’o, Shlomo’s “court” tried and judged the Capital Crimes case of the two prostitutes rather than did a small Sanhedrin court in a city of refuge. Actions have consequences, king David failed to rule the case of Bat Sheva’s husband with justice and the prophet Natan cursed his kingdom with Civil Wars throughout its generations. King Shlomo failed to establish Sanhedrin courts and small Sanhedrin cities of refuge, he worshipped avoda zarah as a direct consequence, with g’lut for the people of Yechuda and Israel – the direct consequence.
גופא — Why did the Torah write אלהים rather than the שם השם? Clearly this question bothered אונקלוס. Rashi addresses the distinctions between judgment and mercy. But this explanation flawed at best, as explained above. The 4th Oral Torah middah רחום learns from the Torah precedents of expunging the nations of Canaan from off the land; the eternal war waged against Amalek/antisemitism; and the דיני נפשות Sanhedrin Capital Crimes case against the משל stubborn and rebellious son; the נמשל the Capital Crimes obligations to expunge wicked evil from the midst of the Israelite nation to prevent the catastrophe of our people worshipping a golden calf like as promoted by the ערב רב that came out of Egypt and failed to develop the tohor middah known as יראת אלהים. The same exact אלהים referenced in the third word of the Torah revelation.
The language seems obtuse. Why not אלהים בראשית ברא? Answer: Theology\belief systems creates Gods. The Talmud teaches that both Esau and Ishmael rejected receiving the Torah at Sinai. The religions of Xtianity and Islam both create their respected word translation Gods, no different from the sin of the Golden Calf אלהים. Hence the opening creation story introduces the ב’ ראשית of the Yatzir HaRaw or tumah Yatzir, which Rashi references through מדת הדין.
He falsely depicts this as harsh vs a prioritized מדת רחמים. But based upon the precedents to uproot the kingdoms of Canaan, to eternally war against Amalek and to put to death the stubborn rebellious minor son! The middah of רחום prioritizes חיים over גלות מות, just as Moshe Rabbeinu advised the generation who invaded and conquered Canaan.
The 2nd Sinai commandment, understood through the Torah precedents which forbid assimilation unto foreign customs, cultures, mannerisms and ways; and another negative commandment against marrying Goyim women whose people never accepted the Torah revelation at Sinai. Both these cardinal Torah transgressions which define the k’vanna of the 2nd Sinai commandment – king Shlomo bathed in the guilt of this Av tuma avoda zarah.
Therefore, based upon this preamble it appears reasonable to conclude that the Torah introduces the Yatzir טוב מאוד first. Parshat Noach supports this premise. Twenty generations later the Torah now addresses Avram as the father of the chosen Cohen people – as the tohor Yatzir Ha’Tov. The Torah revelation spins around the central axis of distinguishment between tohor vs tuma Yatzir spirits which caused Esau and Yaacov to wrestle within the womb of Rivka.
Order of birth does not determine who merits to become the Chosen Cohen seed. The tribe of Levi replaced all the first born of Israel following the sin of the Golden Calf! The sin of the Golden Calf duplicated throughout the Xtian bibles and Muslim korans. Impossible to translate the שם השם לשמה, the gospel of John an abomination because his gospel declares word translations as equal to the Divine Spirit Name.
The critical הבדלה introduced by the Book of בראשית — tohor time-oriented Av-commandments wherein תמיד מעשה בראשית created the chosen Cohen people יש מאין throughout all generations through Torah oaths which through the dedication of tohor Oral Torah middot לשמה sanctify the k’vanna required to create מלאכים שברא יש מאין; and to accept the yoke of the kingdom of Heaven upon these Torah oath created מלאכים as the eternal messengers of both war and peace of the chosen Cohen people.
Crap!
Noise
That’s what happens when you speak.
fuck you shit 4 brains
Racist supporters of genocide have NO right to use past genocides to support their position!
Exactly. Racist Fuck Off.
Shut the fuck up with your racist whining about ALL Europeans being guilty of the Shoah – we weren’t even alive then! So racist and stupid – especially from one who openly supports the present-day genocide of the Palestinians.
All European pigs guilty of the Shoah for all eternity. Now Fuck off loser.
Stupid racist supporter of genocide. You don’t know how stupid you sound. All guilty of crimes they didn’t commit forever! Idiot!
Guilt guilt guilt.
Childish stupidity.
Oink Oink
Just as Baal worshipers prioritized wealth and earthly gains, JeZeus warns the rich about the perils of reliance on material wealth. But whereas the Books of the NaCH Prophets prioritizes pursuit of righteous judicial courtroom justice, not so the plagiarized gospel (Protocols of the Elders of Zionism) Roman forgery.
The Gospels plagiarize the T’NaCH. A classic example the 40 day fast of JeZeus in the Sinai desert. Which attempts to duplicate the revelation of the Torah at Sinai and Elijah’s fleeing to the wilderness away from the wrath of the foreign Queen of Israel after the public slaughter of the prophets of Baal.
Such plagiarism seeks to prove that JeZeus “fulfilled” the words of the prophets. Ignorant and oblivious to the simple fact that prophets do not predict the future as does witchcraft but rather commands prophetic mussar applicable – across the board – to all generations of the Chosen Cohen people for all eternity. The gospel counterfeit thus compares to the Czar secret police “Protocols of the Elders of Zionism”.
Such replacement theology defines the Av tumah avoda zarah sin of the Golden Calf wherein the ערב רב assimilated and intermarried Israelites who came out of Egyptian slavery lacked all יראת אלהים, and hence these mixed multitudes who define the eternal war against Amalek Jews named their Golden Calf אלהים similar to which the NT and Koran gave new Names to their theologically created Gods.
This analogy which compares the New Testament to Baal, suggests that the creation of new theological constructs (such as the Christian understanding of God), akin to the Israelites assimilating pagan practices during their time in the wilderness. The cultural assimilation of Jews throughout the generations, and its impact on the perversion religious belief which prioritizes belief in theologically constructed Gods rather than the pursuit of judicial common law justice wherein the courts enforce fair compensation of damages inflicted by one Party upon another Party. Av tuma avoda zarah always prioritizes belief in Gods above the importance of righteous judicial common law courtrooms.
Do you never learn?
Never learn what? Learned long ago your a Nazi.
I think you mean you’re – meaning you are – rather than Your = meaning that you own it! It’s all about education and intelligence. Can’t expect too much from Nazis!
Bollocks – Nazism European grown.
Israel’s recent diplomatic posture reflects a sharp pivot away from traditional UN frameworks — particularly Resolutions 242 and 338 — and toward the Abraham Accords as its preferred basis for regional peace.
Rejection of UN Resolutions 242 & 338: These resolutions have long underpinned the two-state solution framework, supported by the UN, EU, and Arab League. The directly violate direct negotiations between Israel and Arab states in favor of revisionist history which declares that Israel remains a UN Protectorate territory ruled by international committee ie UN Resolutions.
The Abraham Accords represent a complete break from land-for-peace diplomacy. Israeli diplomacy prioritizes that Arab countries must fundamentally validate the objective of Zionism: Jewish equal rights to achieve self-determination as the 1922 League of Nations Palestine Mandate and the 1948 UN Resolution 181, including the 2/3rds majority of Member states UN Resolution permanently rejects any further UN attempt to impose diplomatic solutions through UN Committee Proxy. Israeli Independence fundamentally rejects any UN diplomatic role in determination of Israeli strategic and tactical diplomatic decisions.
The Abraham Accords, signed in 2020 with UAE, Bahrain, Morocco, and Sudan: focus on economic, security, and diplomatic normalization without requiring territorial concessions. Clear proof that shalom – quite possible without UN mediation or Palestinian dhimmy Arab non State preconditions. Arabs lost the 1948 and 1967 Wars. Full Stop. No revisionist history of these cold hard facts permitted. UN Resolutions 242, 338 etc represent UN Revisionist history which pretends that Israel lost these two wars to the Arab hostile rejection of Zionism, as expressed in UN Resolution 3379: Zionism is Racism.
Israel has increasingly criticized European states — especially London and Paris — for treating it as if it were still under UN mandate status, implying a lack of sovereignty. Furthermore, the long term objective of the Abraham Peace Accords: that a majority of Arab countries across the Middle East and North Africa recognize Israel with the Primary objective of forcing the UN itself to publicly recognize Israel as a country within the Middle East community of Nations. Israel rejects the UN Apartheid policy which excludes Israel as a member State of the Middle East voting block of nations within the UN itself.
UN Resolutions which calls for recognitin of Palestinian statehood furthermore violates the Oslo Accords. Israel a fully sovereign nation, not subject to UN trusteeship. European pressure, specifically addressed through EU participation in UN SC & GA Resolution “committee votes”, Israel interprets as “Colonial-style interference.
Post the Oct 7th 2023 Abomination War, Game Over Israeli response to the recent UN GA vote supported by former West European or Nato allied states which demanded that Israel terminate its “unlawful presence” in Palestinian territories ignores the PLO 1964 Charter which did not refer to “occupied territories” as inclusive of either the Jordanian West Bank or the Egyptian Gaza. Therefore UN 242 & 338 rewrites and ignores the PLO charter of Yasser Arafat’s PLO while it recognizes the Oslo PA as an Indepedent Palestinian State!
Israeli diplomatic doctrine openly rejects the legacy of UN-imposed frameworks and repositions the Abraham Accords as the legitimate foundation for shalom. Shalom, unlike the noun Peace, a verb which requires trust. Peace as a noun only promotes the slight of hand propaganda rhetoric and nothing of real substance.
UN Resolutions 242 & 338, historically central to the two-state solution, viewed by Israel as tools of revisionist diplomacy that undermine its sovereignty. They falsely imply Israel lost the 1948 and 1967 wars and remain under international trusteeship — a notion Israel categorically rejects.
Israel interprets these resolutions as relics of a UN system that seeks to impose outcomes via committee votes rather than direct negotiation. As such, they maintain UN Apartheid policies which adamentaly refuse to validate Zionism established through the League of Nations 1922 Palestine Mandate, based upon the Balfour Declaration signed between Israel and Britain. Since the British defeat in the 1956 War, Britain lost its status as a Great Power. Both Britain and France should not sit on the UN Secority Council as permanent members with veto powers. France lost WWII.
Israel requires direct face to face negotiations with any and all Arab Countries, based upon the latter’s recognition of political Zionism: Jewish equal rights to achieve self-determination in the Middle East and North Africa.
Arab states must recognize Jewish self-determination as rooted in the 1922 League of Nations Mandate and UN Resolution 181 (1947).
Full regional integration of Israel into the Middle East diplomatic bloc, forcing UN recognition of Israel as a legitimate regional actor.
All UN Resolutions demanding Israel withdraw from “unlawful presence” in Palestinian territories are seen as illegitimate. Israel’s “Game Over” response signals a final break with European and UN diplomatic frameworks.
London, Paris, and EU allies are accused of treating Israel as a UN mandate territory, perpetuating colonial-style interference. UN recognition of Palestinian statehood bypasses the Oslo framework, which requires bilateral negotiation.
PLO Charter (1964): Did not claim West Bank or Gaza — undermining the historical basis for current UN territorial claims. UN Resolution 3379: “Zionism is Racism” (revoked in 1991) remains a symbolic grievance in Israeli diplomatic memory. Game Over – Israel demands that Britain and France lose their Great Power status in the UN Security Council. British/EU imperialism\colonialism Israel categorically rejects. France lost WWII and both countries lost the 1956 Suez War. Solid proof that neither country qualifies as a great power. Furthermore Israel as a nuclear power, based upon UN hostility to the existence of political Zionism and the Jewish state, requires permanent member status on the Security Council inclusive of veto powers.
A lack of morality.
Oink Oink
Just as Baal worshipers prioritized wealth and earthly gains, JeZeus warns the rich about the perils of reliance on material wealth. But whereas the Books of the NaCH Prophets prioritizes pursuit of righteous judicial courtroom justice, not so the plagiarized gospel (Protocols of the Elders of Zionism) Roman forgery.
The Gospels plagiarize the T’NaCH. A classic example the 40 day fast of JeZeus in the Sinai desert. Which attempts to duplicate the revelation of the Torah at Sinai and Elijah’s fleeing to the wilderness away from the wrath of the foreign Queen of Israel after the public slaughter of the prophets of Baal.
Such plagiarism seeks to prove that JeZeus “fulfilled” the words of the prophets. Ignorant and oblivious to the simple fact that prophets do not predict the future as does witchcraft but rather commands prophetic mussar applicable – across the board – to all generations of the Chosen Cohen people for all eternity. The gospel counterfeit thus compares to the Czar secret police “Protocols of the Elders of Zionism”.
Such replacement theology defines the Av tumah avoda zarah sin of the Golden Calf wherein the ערב רב assimilated and intermarried Israelites who came out of Egyptian slavery lacked all יראת אלהים, and hence these mixed multitudes who define the eternal war against Amalek Jews named their Golden Calf אלהים similar to which the NT and Koran gave new Names to their theologically created Gods.
This analogy which compares the New Testament to Baal, suggests that the creation of new theological constructs (such as the Christian understanding of God), akin to the Israelites assimilating pagan practices during their time in the wilderness. The cultural assimilation of Jews throughout the generations, and its impact on the perversion religious belief which prioritizes belief in theologically constructed Gods rather than the pursuit of judicial common law justice wherein the courts enforce fair compensation of damages inflicted by one Party upon another Party. Av tuma avoda zarah always prioritizes belief in Gods above the importance of righteous judicial common law courtrooms.
Oaf pig pretend he’s the source of morality.
More bollocks!!
fart
Based upon the response of my last article, the volume and diversity of reactions caused me to re-write a second part to the original document.
This 2nd Parsha of the Book of בראשית, Parshat Noach. The opening two Parshaot serve as an introduction of the Torah which formally begins with the 3rd Parsha – the introduction of Avraham the father of the chosen Cohen people. What do the opening first two Parshaot of בראשית introduce? This fundamentally basic question – it defines these two Parshaot.
Notice that the Torah introduces the Name אלהים rather than the שם השם לשמה. Herein serves as an introduction to the 7th Oral Torah middah רב חסד, which the Talmud interprets to mean as מאי נפקא מינא? The 7th Oral Torah attribute spirit distinguishes – something like as does the קידוש\הבדלה of shabbat the distinction between Av tohor time-oriented commandments from positive commandments. A fundamental מאי נפקא מינא wherein the Talmud discerns that the former Av Torah commandments require “k’vanna (an as yet undefined term which fundamentally requires definition) whereas the latter Torah mitzvot do not require k’vanna/כוונה.
The aggadic mussar story of the Book of בראשית, not at all challenged by the late 19th Century German Higher Criticism. The catastrophic events of the World Wars prompted a reevaluation of Enlightenment ideals, including the objectivity and rationality that underpinned Higher Critical methods. Scholars began to question the biases inherent in historical analysis. Post Shoah no more get out of jail free for Xtianity, with its Nazi rat-lines to prevent the execution of justice upon Nazi war criminals.
Fear of Heaven shapes the reputation of both Man in general and religious institutions in particular. The alliance between Lutheranism and Nazism during the Nazi regime in Germany presents a complex and troubling history which ultimately undermined late 19th Century German Higher Criticism. That both Catholic and Protestant Xtianity aided and assisted the Nazis. Pope Pius XII failed to even protest the Nazi slaughter of Rome’s Jews! Actions speak louder than priests or pastors screaming “Fear God”. The Nazi systematic slaughter of 75% of Western European Jewry while the Xtian church ignored oppression, theft, injustice and genocide permanently destroyed the good name of Xtianity.
Had the church condemned FDR’s decision to embrace Chamberlain’s White Paper and bar European refugees entrance to America perhaps the charge that the Xtian church lacks Fear of Heaven, would not stick to all eternity thereafter. Fear of Heaven, means protecting the Good Name reputation – just that simple. Post Shoah, Hitler and his Nazi SS mafia permanently destroyed the Good Name reputation of all branches of Xtianity; starting with German Protestant ‘Higher Criticism. Higher Criticism, which began to deconstruct traditional interpretations tied to authoritarian and nationalistic ideologies.
Perhaps the Talmud did not clarify crystal clear when Goyim abandoned all together the Brit faith and ipso facto worshipped other Gods. The בראשית aggadic mussar story therefore opens with אלהים כלל rather than the שם השם לשמה פרט. Why did HaShem accept the korban of young Hev’el and reject the Cohen First-born son Cain’s korban? The Torah revelation validate both types of korbanot! The Torah contains the רמז word ברית אש\בראשית. Just as the dispute between the two sons of Adam equally reflected in the רמז word ב’ ראשית. Rabbi Yechuda Ha’Nasi interprets the language of kre’a shma בכל לבבך\כם based upon the Torah precedent: ב’ ראשית, two opposing Yatzirot struggle within the heart like as did Esau and Yaacov wrestled within the womb of Rivka.
Therefore, when exactly did the Goyim reject the ברית אש\בראשית? Concerning the two korbanot dedicated by the two opposing sons of Adam, Hevel’s korban accepted because his k’vanna dedicated the korban through the Torah oath (שם ומלכות) in the Name of the Creation oath brit. Cain’s korban rejected because his korban lacked k’vanna. Hence the distinction between Av tohor time-oriented commandments which require k’vanna from positive תולדות commandments which do not require k’vanna. Do the תולדות follow the Avot? This defining מאי נפקא מינא detail both mesechtot Shabbat and Baba Kama ask – this very question! Clearly the distinction in the case of the two opposing “Yatzirot” of Adam: Doing mitzvot stam does not follow doing mitzvot with the k’vanna of “oath brit”.
ולשת גם הוא ילד בן ויקרא את שמו אנוש אז הוחל לקרא בשם השם.
Following the murder of Hevel, Chava the wife of Adam gave birth to a third son. This third son, who did he follow? The masoret of murdered Hevel or the masoret of Cain? Touching Enosh, the Tanna Targum Onkelos writes: בכן ביומוהי חלו בני אנשא מלצלאה בשמא דהשם. Rashi, an early major Reshon, interprets – אז הוחל. לשון חולין, לקרת את שמות האדם ואת שמות העצבים בשמו של הקדוש ברוך רבים. הוא, לעשותן אלילים ולקרותן אלהות
Recall that the HaShem permitted Adam to call the created animals names in the last p’suk prior to the third aliya to the Torah. But the first born cohen son of שת, the son born after Cain murder Hevel. The Targum employs the verb מלצלאה בשמא דהשם. They prayed to HaShem. Whereas the Rashi explanation the 2nd generation אנוש, comparable to Chava’s: ותאמר האשה אל הנחש מפרי עץ הגן נאכל ומפרי העץ אשר בתוך הגן אמר אלהים לא תאכלו ממנו ולא תגעו בן פן תמתון. Chava added on to the original commandment as did the 2nd generation of Adam, Enosh, who started naming the stars with Divine Names. Just as the snake deceived Chava so to later down stream generations did a ירידות הדורות domino effect and stared worshipping other אלהים. This action of avoda zarah created Man created Gods in the image of Man.
Mesechta Sanhedrin asks the famous question: What caused the Flood disaster in the days of Noach? Answer ברית אש, the fire of the brit sworn oaths (שם ומלכות); the generation of Noach made false oaths! A Torah oath has the power to create through tohor time-oriented Av Torah commandments מלאכים; a Torah oath fundamentally requires שם ומלכות. But only Av tumah avoda zarah assumes that man can create Gods by means of swearing a Torah oath. This tumah yatzir/Yatzir Ha’Raw within the heart literally reads בראשית ברא אלהים. Attempts to create Gods יש מאין profanes ברית אש\בראשית. Herein the מאי נפקא מינא which distinguishes tohor middot from tumah middot; the Divine service of the chosen Cohen people forever separates Shabbat from Chol, זמן גרמא מצוות מן תולדות מצוות.
Its the discernment of fine distinctions which separates like from like which defines the concept of “understanding”. Upon this יסוד breathes the Divine Spirit רב חסד. This middah discerns time-oriented commandments which require k’vanna from תולדות commandments which do not require k’vanna. HaShem accepted the korban of 2nd born Hevel because he dedicated the korban לשם ברית. HaShem rejected the korban of Adam’s first born son Cain, because he dedicated his korban – as a reactionary barbeque unto Heaven. A fundamental מאי נפקא מינא.
The concepts discussed this text concerning Prophetic Mussar vs. Higher Criticism – likened to strategic elements in American football, where the interplay of different philosophies and techniques shapes the game’s outcomes. The interpretation of religious texts, particularly the T’NaCH and Talmud, through the lens of Protestant Higher Criticism highlights a significant divide similar to competing teams in sports. This comparison illustrates how differing interpretations can create rival perspectives akin to the dynamics observed in competitive sports.
The ethical conflicts discussed, like the rejection of Cain’s offering, resemble the moral decisions players and coaches face during the game. Decisions made in split seconds can have far-reaching implications, just as ethical considerations shape spiritual narratives. The tensions between different interpretations of faith parallel heated rivalries in American football, where teams vie for dominance based on different strategies—some focusing on offense (like allowing emotional decisions to guide Korban choices), while others emphasize defense (like the analytical approach of Higher Criticism, showing how such a path leads to a 4th down punt or worse a fumble or interception.)
Protestant Higher Criticism perceives the T’NaCH as a historical document rather than instruction which teaches mussar as it applies to the generations. The former compare to placing an idol upon a plinth pedestal and worshipping this superior theologically created being – as a God. Both Xtianity and Islam do exactly this with their treatment and behavior toward Jesus and Muhammad. Recall when western magazines mocked Muhammad and Muslims physically attacked both institutions and persons. Salman Rushdie’s “The Satanic Verses” declared blasphemous by many in the Muslim community which resulted in Rushdie hiding for his life. The Salem witch trials, between February 1692 and May 1693. The Puritans, held strong beliefs in the supernatural. They viewed the world as a battleground between God and the Devil, leading to fears of witches as instruments of evil.
Both this and that absolutely insist that Jesus and Muhammad lived as historical persons. Protestant Higher Criticism denounced the Hebrew T’NaCH as a fraud. They declared that multiple authors actually wrote the Torah and say the book of Isaiah over the span of centuries. This idea that “scholarship” must interpret T’NaCH literature as physical and historical rather than as mussar rebukes equally applicable to all persons in all generations separates Traditional Judaism from Conservative and Reform Judaism which likewise views the T’NaCH as primarily historical documents.
Hence how a person interprets the T’NaCH and Talmud pits two or more sets of opposing teams. The same equally applies scholarly disputes within the Talmud itself. Publication of the Rambam’s Yad Hazakah exploded into a Jewish Civil War whose impact destroyed generations of Jews even after Napoleon freed Western European Jews from the Catholic ghetto gulags of three Centuries. The Rambam Civil War pits judicial Talmudic common law against assimilated Greek/Roman statute laws. Four part פרדס inductive logic against three part Syllogism deductive logic. Just as sports teams build their programs around acquiring the best talented players, so to T’NaCH and Talmudic scholarship disputed and fought over down through the millennium.
The violent reactions to perceived blasphemy, such as attacks following disrespect towards religious figures (Muhammad, Jesus), parallel heated rivalries in sports, where fans quite often react vehemently against perceived slights to their teams or athletes in both American and European football. Competing interpretations of sacred texts create a dialogue similar to rival teams focusing on their strengths and weaknesses. The debate over Talmudic interpretation—judicial common law vs. foreign legislative statute law—resembles the endless strategizing that teams engage in to outmaneuver their opponents.
The tension between interpretations of the T’NaCH and Talmud can be likened to rivalry in sports, where competing teams navigate through a complex landscape of strategies, beliefs, and interpretations. Just as sports teams flourish through their scholar-like understanding of gameplay and competition, religious communities develop their unique culture, customs, identities and philosophies around the interpretation of sacred texts—creating a dynamic and ongoing dialogue, in fact – quite similar to violent conflict between the fans in the world of sports. A rich tapestry of beliefs and practices that, while distinct, often results in far wider fan clashes inside and outside both arenas and society. Violence influences wider cultural and social dynamics across American and European societies which inherit hatred which equals the Sunni Shiite rivalry which divides Arab and Muslim civilizations.
Just as Baal worshipers prioritized wealth and earthly gains, JeZeus warns the rich about the perils of reliance on material wealth. But whereas the Books of the NaCH Prophets prioritizes pursuit of righteous judicial courtroom justice, not so the plagiarized gospel (Protocols of the Elders of Zionism) Roman forgery.
The Gospels plagiarize the T’NaCH. A classic example the 40 day fast of JeZeus in the Sinai desert. Which attempts to duplicate the revelation of the Torah at Sinai and Elijah’s fleeing to the wilderness away from the wrath of the foreign Queen of Israel after the public slaughter of the prophets of Baal.
Such plagiarism seeks to prove that JeZeus “fulfilled” the words of the prophets. Ignorant and oblivious to the simple fact that prophets do not predict the future as does witchcraft but rather commands prophetic mussar applicable – across the board – to all generations of the Chosen Cohen people for all eternity. The gospel counterfeit thus compares to the Czar secret police “Protocols of the Elders of Zionism”.
Such replacement theology defines the Av tumah avoda zarah sin of the Golden Calf wherein the ערב רב assimilated and intermarried Israelites who came out of Egyptian slavery lacked all יראת אלהים, and hence these mixed multitudes who define the eternal war against Amalek Jews named their Golden Calf אלהים similar to which the NT and Koran gave new Names to their theologically created Gods.
This analogy which compares the New Testament to Baal, suggests that the creation of new theological constructs (such as the Christian understanding of God), akin to the Israelites assimilating pagan practices during their time in the wilderness. The cultural assimilation of Jews throughout the generations, and its impact on the perversion religious belief which prioritizes belief in theologically constructed Gods rather than the pursuit of judicial common law justice wherein the courts enforce fair compensation of damages inflicted by one Party upon another Party. Av tuma avoda zarah always prioritizes belief in Gods above the importance of righteous judicial common law courtrooms.
Silly junk!
You traveled around the world, and that’s all you learned? Jack Ass.
Learned a lot more!
Yet you fail to show it. LOL
Only the Chosen Cohen People accepted the revelation of the Torah at Sinai.
This false Av tuma avoda zara verse, 2 Corinthians 8:9, emphasizes the themes of grace, sacrificial love, and generosity, particularly within the context of Xtian avoda zarah theology. Torah defines faith as the righteous pursuit of fair restitution of damages inflicted by one upon another through Sanhedrin common law judicial courtrooms. JeZeus a foreign alien false prophet. The NT does not understand that all Torah prophesy commands mussar. The Xtian viewpoint Av tumah avoda zarah worship of other Gods. A direct violation of the 2nd Sinai commandment.
The humility of Moshe Rabbeinu, his silence when confronted by emotional mobs. The revelation of the Torah at Sinai specifically excludes both Esau and Yishmael who both categorically reject the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. Proof. No where in the Xtian NT or Muslim Koran – the Hebrew Name of HaShem. The revelation of this Divine Name – a Spirit and NOT some disgusting word translation, like as expressed through the sin of the Golden Calf.
The Xtian NT falsely interprets prophesy as predictions of future events. Hence the NT books of Av tuma avoda zarah declare that JeZeus fulfilled the words of the prophets! This mirrors the witchcraft of the prophet Bil’aam, who likewise prophesied future events. Witchcraft foretells the future. Torah prophets command mussar to the generations of the chosen Cohen people.
In Judaism, avoda zarah refers to the worship of foreign gods, explicitly forbidden in the Torah second Sinai commandment. The concept of faith in Torah centers itself around mussar (dedication of tohor Oral Torah middot to change future social interactions a man has with his people) and justice, particularly in the context of restitution through judicial common law/legislative review mandate systems like the Sanhedrin. The God of Israel a tribal God NOT some Xtian or Muslim Universal God. Only the chosen Cohen people accepted HaShem as our God at Sinai.
The revelation of the Torah at Sinai fundamentally and categorically rejects the strict monotheism preached by the false prophet Mohammad. Why? Monotheism directly violates the 2nd Sinai commandments. Hence the theology of some Universal One God Monotheism = a Torah abomination of the first order. Both the NT and Koran failed to grasp that Israel, through the holiness of doing tohor time-oriented Torah commandments, creates Angels from the holiness of these time-oriented Torah commandments. The av tumah avoda zarah of both Xtianity and Islam knows absolutely nothing about tohor time-oriented commandments dedicated to HaShem similar to a sacrifice dedicated upon the altar on Zion Jerusalem. A fundamental distinction between their foreign false Gods and the revelation of the Torah at Sinai.
Torah faith rejects the Goyim idea that through theology that man can create God – as both Xtianity and Islam preach. Both religions of avoda zarah never call to the Name of HaShem nor validate the chosen Cohen people as the only people who accept the Torah at Sinai. Covenant, a false corrupt translation of brit. The latter requires swearing a Torah oath which absolutely requires שם ומלכות. The NT and Koran fail to create Angles through שם ומלכות time-oriented commandments, dedicated to establish the yoke of the kingdom of Heaven upon these oath created Angels – sent as messengers of Israel in times of peace and war.
Antiquated nonsense from ignorant times.
fuck you shit 4 brains
Racist supporters of genocide have NO right to use past genocides to support their position!
Exactly. Racist Fuck Off.
Shut the fuck up with your racist whining about ALL Europeans being guilty of the Shoah – we weren’t even alive then! So racist and stupid – especially from one who openly supports the present-day genocide of the Palestinians.
All Europeans guilty for the Shoah. Just that simple. Oink Oink Oink. Now fuck off.
Racist jerk!
All Oaf-er pigs guilty of the Shoah.
If all Jews were as racist, fascist and stupid….
Oink Oink
Just as Baal worshipers prioritized wealth and earthly gains, JeZeus warns the rich about the perils of reliance on material wealth. But whereas the Books of the NaCH Prophets prioritizes pursuit of righteous judicial courtroom justice, not so the plagiarized gospel (Protocols of the Elders of Zionism) Roman forgery.
The Gospels plagiarize the T’NaCH. A classic example the 40 day fast of JeZeus in the Sinai desert. Which attempts to duplicate the revelation of the Torah at Sinai and Elijah’s fleeing to the wilderness away from the wrath of the foreign Queen of Israel after the public slaughter of the prophets of Baal.
Such plagiarism seeks to prove that JeZeus “fulfilled” the words of the prophets. Ignorant and oblivious to the simple fact that prophets do not predict the future as does witchcraft but rather commands prophetic mussar applicable – across the board – to all generations of the Chosen Cohen people for all eternity. The gospel counterfeit thus compares to the Czar secret police “Protocols of the Elders of Zionism”.
Such replacement theology defines the Av tumah avoda zarah sin of the Golden Calf wherein the ערב רב assimilated and intermarried Israelites who came out of Egyptian slavery lacked all יראת אלהים, and hence these mixed multitudes who define the eternal war against Amalek Jews named their Golden Calf אלהים similar to which the NT and Koran gave new Names to their theologically created Gods.
This analogy which compares the New Testament to Baal, suggests that the creation of new theological constructs (such as the Christian understanding of God), akin to the Israelites assimilating pagan practices during their time in the wilderness. The cultural assimilation of Jews throughout the generations, and its impact on the perversion religious belief which prioritizes belief in theologically constructed Gods rather than the pursuit of judicial common law justice wherein the courts enforce fair compensation of damages inflicted by one Party upon another Party. Av tuma avoda zarah always prioritizes belief in Gods above the importance of righteous judicial common law courtrooms.
Why put up this garbage??
The sum total of Human experience a fat self centered moron does not compare. Idiot your racist condemnation of genius expressed through the Ages of Humanity – so utterly void and shallow.
Israel’s recent diplomatic posture reflects a sharp pivot away from traditional UN frameworks — particularly Resolutions 242 and 338 — and toward the Abraham Accords as its preferred basis for regional peace.
Rejection of UN Resolutions 242 & 338: These resolutions have long underpinned the two-state solution framework, supported by the UN, EU, and Arab League. The directly violate direct negotiations between Israel and Arab states in favor of revisionist history which declares that Israel remains a UN Protectorate territory ruled by international committee ie UN Resolutions.
The Abraham Accords represent a complete break from land-for-peace diplomacy. Israeli diplomacy prioritizes that Arab countries must fundamentally validate the objective of Zionism: Jewish equal rights to achieve self-determination as the 1922 League of Nations Palestine Mandate and the 1948 UN Resolution 181, including the 2/3rds majority of Member states UN Resolution permanently rejects any further UN attempt to impose diplomatic solutions through UN Committee Proxy. Israeli Independence fundamentally rejects any UN diplomatic role in determination of Israeli strategic and tactical diplomatic decisions.
The Abraham Accords, signed in 2020 with UAE, Bahrain, Morocco, and Sudan: focus on economic, security, and diplomatic normalization without requiring territorial concessions. Clear proof that shalom – quite possible without UN mediation or Palestinian dhimmy Arab non State preconditions. Arabs lost the 1948 and 1967 Wars. Full Stop. No revisionist history of these cold hard facts permitted. UN Resolutions 242, 338 etc represent UN Revisionist history which pretends that Israel lost these two wars to the Arab hostile rejection of Zionism, as expressed in UN Resolution 3379: Zionism is Racism.
Israel has increasingly criticized European states — especially London and Paris — for treating it as if it were still under UN mandate status, implying a lack of sovereignty. Furthermore, the long term objective of the Abraham Peace Accords: that a majority of Arab countries across the Middle East and North Africa recognize Israel with the Primary objective of forcing the UN itself to publicly recognize Israel as a country within the Middle East community of Nations. Israel rejects the UN Apartheid policy which excludes Israel as a member State of the Middle East voting block of nations within the UN itself.
UN Resolutions which calls for recognitin of Palestinian statehood furthermore violates the Oslo Accords. Israel a fully sovereign nation, not subject to UN trusteeship. European pressure, specifically addressed through EU participation in UN SC & GA Resolution “committee votes”, Israel interprets as “Colonial-style interference.
Post the Oct 7th 2023 Abomination War, Game Over Israeli response to the recent UN GA vote supported by former West European or Nato allied states which demanded that Israel terminate its “unlawful presence” in Palestinian territories ignores the PLO 1964 Charter which did not refer to “occupied territories” as inclusive of either the Jordanian West Bank or the Egyptian Gaza. Therefore UN 242 & 338 rewrites and ignores the PLO charter of Yasser Arafat’s PLO while it recognizes the Oslo PA as an Indepedent Palestinian State!
Israeli diplomatic doctrine openly rejects the legacy of UN-imposed frameworks and repositions the Abraham Accords as the legitimate foundation for shalom. Shalom, unlike the noun Peace, a verb which requires trust. Peace as a noun only promotes the slight of hand propaganda rhetoric and nothing of real substance.
UN Resolutions 242 & 338, historically central to the two-state solution, viewed by Israel as tools of revisionist diplomacy that undermine its sovereignty. They falsely imply Israel lost the 1948 and 1967 wars and remain under international trusteeship — a notion Israel categorically rejects.
Israel interprets these resolutions as relics of a UN system that seeks to impose outcomes via committee votes rather than direct negotiation. As such, they maintain UN Apartheid policies which adamentaly refuse to validate Zionism established through the League of Nations 1922 Palestine Mandate, based upon the Balfour Declaration signed between Israel and Britain. Since the British defeat in the 1956 War, Britain lost its status as a Great Power. Both Britain and France should not sit on the UN Secority Council as permanent members with veto powers. France lost WWII.
Israel requires direct face to face negotiations with any and all Arab Countries, based upon the latter’s recognition of political Zionism: Jewish equal rights to achieve self-determination in the Middle East and North Africa.
Arab states must recognize Jewish self-determination as rooted in the 1922 League of Nations Mandate and UN Resolution 181 (1947).
Full regional integration of Israel into the Middle East diplomatic bloc, forcing UN recognition of Israel as a legitimate regional actor.
All UN Resolutions demanding Israel withdraw from “unlawful presence” in Palestinian territories are seen as illegitimate. Israel’s “Game Over” response signals a final break with European and UN diplomatic frameworks.
London, Paris, and EU allies are accused of treating Israel as a UN mandate territory, perpetuating colonial-style interference. UN recognition of Palestinian statehood bypasses the Oslo framework, which requires bilateral negotiation.
PLO Charter (1964): Did not claim West Bank or Gaza — undermining the historical basis for current UN territorial claims. UN Resolution 3379: “Zionism is Racism” (revoked in 1991) remains a symbolic grievance in Israeli diplomatic memory. Game Over – Israel demands that Britain and France lose their Great Power status in the UN Security Council. British/EU imperialism\colonialism Israel categorically rejects. France lost WWII and both countries lost the 1956 Suez War. Solid proof that neither country qualifies as a great power. Furthermore Israel as a nuclear power, based upon UN hostility to the existence of political Zionism and the Jewish state, requires permanent member status on the Security Council inclusive of veto powers.
I can see what the Palestinians are up against!
Oink Oink
Just as Baal worshipers prioritized wealth and earthly gains, JeZeus warns the rich about the perils of reliance on material wealth. But whereas the Books of the NaCH Prophets prioritizes pursuit of righteous judicial courtroom justice, not so the plagiarized gospel (Protocols of the Elders of Zionism) Roman forgery.
The Gospels plagiarize the T’NaCH. A classic example the 40 day fast of JeZeus in the Sinai desert. Which attempts to duplicate the revelation of the Torah at Sinai and Elijah’s fleeing to the wilderness away from the wrath of the foreign Queen of Israel after the public slaughter of the prophets of Baal.
Such plagiarism seeks to prove that JeZeus “fulfilled” the words of the prophets. Ignorant and oblivious to the simple fact that prophets do not predict the future as does witchcraft but rather commands prophetic mussar applicable – across the board – to all generations of the Chosen Cohen people for all eternity. The gospel counterfeit thus compares to the Czar secret police “Protocols of the Elders of Zionism”.
Such replacement theology defines the Av tumah avoda zarah sin of the Golden Calf wherein the ערב רב assimilated and intermarried Israelites who came out of Egyptian slavery lacked all יראת אלהים, and hence these mixed multitudes who define the eternal war against Amalek Jews named their Golden Calf אלהים similar to which the NT and Koran gave new Names to their theologically created Gods.
This analogy which compares the New Testament to Baal, suggests that the creation of new theological constructs (such as the Christian understanding of God), akin to the Israelites assimilating pagan practices during their time in the wilderness. The cultural assimilation of Jews throughout the generations, and its impact on the perversion religious belief which prioritizes belief in theologically constructed Gods rather than the pursuit of judicial common law justice wherein the courts enforce fair compensation of damages inflicted by one Party upon another Party. Av tuma avoda zarah always prioritizes belief in Gods above the importance of righteous judicial common law courtrooms.
Mindless
Mindless Noise.
Islamic Worship Compared to Baal Worship and Its Theological Implications. Both Monotheism and Polytheism profane the First & Second Sinai commandments. Strict monotheism as Islam declares profanes the 2nd Sinai commandment and all the Books of the NaCH, which validates the Av tumah worship of other Gods. Sinai as Oath Law. Not any Theology which creates Gods.
The assertion that Islam operates similarly to Baal worship alongside Christianity raises substantial theological discussions regarding the essence of divinity in these faiths. Both Islam and Christianity can be critiqued for adopting practices seen as disconnected from earlier biblical traditions. The post-Shoah critique highlights the inadequacy of modern biblical translations and the tragic consequences faced by various branches of Xtianity. The post-Shoah critique highlights the inadequacy of modern biblical translations and the tragic consequences faced by various branches of Xtianity. Islam cut an alliance with Nazism during WWII and thereafter when the Arabs attempted to complete the Nazi Shoah in both 1948 and again in 1967.
Leaders, such as Grand Mufti Muhammad Amin al-Husseini, sought to oppose British colonial rule and perceived Jewish influence in League of Nations 1922 Palestine Mandate as European colonialism. The Lutheran Church in Germany expressed support for Nazi ideology, seeing it as compatible with nationalist sentiments. FDR supported the 1939 White Paper by closing off American Ports to European Jewish refugees. No Xtian denominational leader denounced FDR’s decision.
Lutheran leaders supported Nazi policies based upon the writings of Martin Luther himself. The closure of American ports to European Jewish refugees effectively restricted escape routes at a crucial time leading up to the Shoah. The lack of denouncement from major Christian denominational leaders regarding FDR’s policies indicates complex relationships between faith, politics, and social justice. For the opportunistic Church, whether Pope Pius XII permitting the Nazi slaughter of all the Jews of Rome or Protestant denominations in America who prioritized national interests over humanitarian principles, the bankruptcy of Xtain faith – total and complete.
Monotheism collapses all nations under one universal deity. Erases the oath-based distinction between Israel’s God and others. Violates על פני — the prohibition against universalizing HaShem. Islamic tawḥīd claims absolute unity of Allah as Creator of all peoples. The Torah’s second commandment forbids worship “על פני” — literally, “in My Presence,” meaning before or instead of the Name revealed at Sinai.
By rejecting HaShem’s particular Name and covenantal peoplehood, tawḥīd, together with the Nicene Creed Trinity, both theological creeds endorse a universalization of God which annuls the oath alliance cut with the Chosen Cohen people created continually through Av tohor time-oriented Commandments as defined through the first Book of the Torah בראשית. Thus, even though Islam rejects idolatry in the physical sense, it commits avoda zarah in the juridical sense — transferring divine authority from the local brit haaretz (oath-land) to a universal god divorced from the oath sworn to the Avot to create יש מאין the chosen Cohen people throughout all generations.
Tanakh recognizes that other nations have their own deities and courts — “כי כל העמים ילכו איש בשם אלהיו, ואנחנו נלך בשם ה׳ אלהינו לעולם ועד” (Micah 4:5). Goyim worship, by definition, other Gods. Neither the NT nor Koran ever once bring the שם השם לשמה. Therefore Islam’s tawhid approximates Baal kingship; Xtianity’s Trinity too exposed as pagan syncretism, substitute theology.
The First and Second Dibrot the ultimate constitutional clauses: they create an exclusive legal allegiance (שם ומלכות) for the chosen Cohen people. These two commandments shape and establish Torah common law as jurisdictional; who exercises sovereign law over the Cohen people and their oath brit land. Collapsing all nations under one universal Allah erases Israel’s Sinai brit Name and oath-land; it replaces particular brit obligations, specifically to pursue judicial common law justice, with abstract, cosmopolitan deity-claims of faith(also violates the second commandment by removing the “על פני” juridical boundary). Post Shoah Arab propaganda and UN Resolution 2334 openly ignore Jewish rule during the first and second Commonwealths.
At root, avoda zarah is not the worship of idols but the misplacement of sovereignty. When divine law is detached from its oath-based Name and judicial system, worship itself becomes alien service. Islam’s tawḥīd and Christianity’s Trinity thus both constitute juridical heresies: the former by erasing all distinctions (universal monarchy), the latter by introducing an ontological multiplicity (divine oligarchy). Both produce the same consequence: a moral universe without brit justice. No church or mosque has ever stood before a Sanhedrin-like court to restore the damages of centuries of bloodshed. That absence marks their worship as alien.
Weigh the Five Solas through the Lens of Protestant Reformation consequent to the 30 Year War. More Europeans died in that blood bath, comparatively matched till the horrors of WWI. Xtianity has a very long history of utter barbarism and moral depravity.
1. Sola rejects the autocracy of the Pope and his opposing Protestant Ministers. Sola Scriptura challenged the Catholic Church’s authority and tradition as co-equal to Scripture. Post Shoah the sophomoric bible translations proven to be tits on a boar hog. All branches of Xtianity refuted, disgraced, and killed by the Shoah.
2. Sola Fide replaced a works-based righteousness with faith as the sole criterion. Pie in the sky. Faith according to the language of the Written Torah – pursuit of judicial Sanhedrin courtroom common law justice which sanctifies the restoration of damages inflicted upon other(s) in order to restore trust among the Jewish people. The av tumah avoda zarah substitute theology where “faith in God” substitutes and replace fair resolution of damages inflicted – an utter av tumah abomination of avoda zarah.
3. Sola Gratia emphasizes salvation as a divine gift rather than a human achievement. According to the Torah the 5th Oral Torah middah/attribute a broad based tohor dedication inclusive of patience, discernment of ones’ own destiny walk. The false translation of חנון as ”grace”, as false as the translation of brit into covenant.
To swear a Torah brit requires making a Torah oath through שם ומלכות. The NT never once includes the Name of the first Sinai commandment. Kingship refers to “direction”. A person dedicates a tohor middah, say חנון לשמה to influence his future behavioral actions with family, friends, and neighbors in the future. For example following the brit cut between the pieces where Avraham cut a brit (oath alliance) with HaShem (a local god NOT a Universal God), Avraham understood his destiny walk before El Shaddai through brit melah/circumcision.
The Apostle Paul declared that circumcision – no longer the destiny walk before El Shaddai. But based upon the 2nd Sinai Commandment, clearly the Apostle Paul worshipped some other God. The Nicene Council defined the God worshipped by Paul as a mysterious Trinity God. Uncircumcised Xtians did not walk down the say destiny path as Jews. Their idolatry of Grace rejected the oblication upon courts of law to make fair restitution of damages. No European courtroom ever forced the Church fathers – Catholic or Protestant – to stand before the bar for war crimes.
4. Solus Christus asserts Christ’s exclusive mediatorship, negating the intercession of saints. Solus Christus asserts Christ’s exclusive mediatorship, negating the intercession of saints. This substitute theology replaces Avraham, Yitzak, and Yaacov as the fathers of the chosen Cohen people and replaces it with a false messiah which ignores the Moshiach dedication to rule the oath sworn land with righteous judicial justice. This doctrine declares that the Xtian church has succeeded Israel in God’s Grace destiny plan. Yet fails to address the Name of the local god revealed in the first Sinai commandment.
The Oral Torah commandment of Moshiach interprets the Written Torah, based upon the positive commandment precedents that Moshe anointed the House of Aaron with oil, and Aaron anoints korbanot with oil. This anointing with oil constitutes as the mitzva of Moshiach. It begs the Oral Torah question? Anointed for what specific sanctification לשמה? The Oral Torah interprets the mitzva of Moshiach to mean anointed to rule the oath sworn lands with judicial justice. Clearly the NT destiny walk diverges from the Jewish Cohen people destiny walk.
5. Soli Deo Gloria shifts focus from church institutions to God’s glory in all aspects of life. God’s glory understood a God as a Universal God. This patent av tumah avoda zarah rejects the first Sinai Commandment, wherein only the 12 Tribes of Israel accepted the Torah revelation. Sinai defines this “glory לשמה. The divergent destiny path taken by the Church – both Catholic and Protestant – directly comparable to the path of Baal worship. Under this more ancient av tumah avoda zarah Baal also referred this God as king.
More bollocks!!
fart
Based upon the response of my last article, the volume and diversity of reactions caused me to re-write a second part to the original document.
This 2nd Parsha of the Book of בראשית, Parshat Noach. The opening two Parshaot serve as an introduction of the Torah which formally begins with the 3rd Parsha – the introduction of Avraham the father of the chosen Cohen people. What do the opening first two Parshaot of בראשית introduce? This fundamentally basic question – it defines these two Parshaot.
Notice that the Torah introduces the Name אלהים rather than the שם השם לשמה. Herein serves as an introduction to the 7th Oral Torah middah רב חסד, which the Talmud interprets to mean as מאי נפקא מינא? The 7th Oral Torah attribute spirit distinguishes – something like as does the קידוש\הבדלה of shabbat the distinction between Av tohor time-oriented commandments from positive commandments. A fundamental מאי נפקא מינא wherein the Talmud discerns that the former Av Torah commandments require “k’vanna (an as yet undefined term which fundamentally requires definition) whereas the latter Torah mitzvot do not require k’vanna/כוונה.
The aggadic mussar story of the Book of בראשית, not at all challenged by the late 19th Century German Higher Criticism. The catastrophic events of the World Wars prompted a reevaluation of Enlightenment ideals, including the objectivity and rationality that underpinned Higher Critical methods. Scholars began to question the biases inherent in historical analysis. Post Shoah no more get out of jail free for Xtianity, with its Nazi rat-lines to prevent the execution of justice upon Nazi war criminals.
Fear of Heaven shapes the reputation of both Man in general and religious institutions in particular. The alliance between Lutheranism and Nazism during the Nazi regime in Germany presents a complex and troubling history which ultimately undermined late 19th Century German Higher Criticism. That both Catholic and Protestant Xtianity aided and assisted the Nazis. Pope Pius XII failed to even protest the Nazi slaughter of Rome’s Jews! Actions speak louder than priests or pastors screaming “Fear God”. The Nazi systematic slaughter of 75% of Western European Jewry while the Xtian church ignored oppression, theft, injustice and genocide permanently destroyed the good name of Xtianity.
Had the church condemned FDR’s decision to embrace Chamberlain’s White Paper and bar European refugees entrance to America perhaps the charge that the Xtian church lacks Fear of Heaven, would not stick to all eternity thereafter. Fear of Heaven, means protecting the Good Name reputation – just that simple. Post Shoah, Hitler and his Nazi SS mafia permanently destroyed the Good Name reputation of all branches of Xtianity; starting with German Protestant ‘Higher Criticism. Higher Criticism, which began to deconstruct traditional interpretations tied to authoritarian and nationalistic ideologies.
Perhaps the Talmud did not clarify crystal clear when Goyim abandoned all together the Brit faith and ipso facto worshipped other Gods. The בראשית aggadic mussar story therefore opens with אלהים כלל rather than the שם השם לשמה פרט. Why did HaShem accept the korban of young Hev’el and reject the Cohen First-born son Cain’s korban? The Torah revelation validate both types of korbanot! The Torah contains the רמז word ברית אש\בראשית. Just as the dispute between the two sons of Adam equally reflected in the רמז word ב’ ראשית. Rabbi Yechuda Ha’Nasi interprets the language of kre’a shma בכל לבבך\כם based upon the Torah precedent: ב’ ראשית, two opposing Yatzirot struggle within the heart like as did Esau and Yaacov wrestled within the womb of Rivka.
Therefore, when exactly did the Goyim reject the ברית אש\בראשית? Concerning the two korbanot dedicated by the two opposing sons of Adam, Hevel’s korban accepted because his k’vanna dedicated the korban through the Torah oath (שם ומלכות) in the Name of the Creation oath brit. Cain’s korban rejected because his korban lacked k’vanna. Hence the distinction between Av tohor time-oriented commandments which require k’vanna from positive תולדות commandments which do not require k’vanna. Do the תולדות follow the Avot? This defining מאי נפקא מינא detail both mesechtot Shabbat and Baba Kama ask – this very question! Clearly the distinction in the case of the two opposing “Yatzirot” of Adam: Doing mitzvot stam does not follow doing mitzvot with the k’vanna of “oath brit”.
ולשת גם הוא ילד בן ויקרא את שמו אנוש אז הוחל לקרא בשם השם.
Following the murder of Hevel, Chava the wife of Adam gave birth to a third son. This third son, who did he follow? The masoret of murdered Hevel or the masoret of Cain? Touching Enosh, the Tanna Targum Onkelos writes: בכן ביומוהי חלו בני אנשא מלצלאה בשמא דהשם. Rashi, an early major Reshon, interprets – אז הוחל. לשון חולין, לקרת את שמות האדם ואת שמות העצבים בשמו של הקדוש ברוך רבים. הוא, לעשותן אלילים ולקרותן אלהות
Recall that the HaShem permitted Adam to call the created animals names in the last p’suk prior to the third aliya to the Torah. But the first born cohen son of שת, the son born after Cain murder Hevel. The Targum employs the verb מלצלאה בשמא דהשם. They prayed to HaShem. Whereas the Rashi explanation the 2nd generation אנוש, comparable to Chava’s: ותאמר האשה אל הנחש מפרי עץ הגן נאכל ומפרי העץ אשר בתוך הגן אמר אלהים לא תאכלו ממנו ולא תגעו בן פן תמתון. Chava added on to the original commandment as did the 2nd generation of Adam, Enosh, who started naming the stars with Divine Names. Just as the snake deceived Chava so to later down stream generations did a ירידות הדורות domino effect and stared worshipping other אלהים. This action of avoda zarah created Man created Gods in the image of Man.
Mesechta Sanhedrin asks the famous question: What caused the Flood disaster in the days of Noach? Answer ברית אש, the fire of the brit sworn oaths (שם ומלכות); the generation of Noach made false oaths! A Torah oath has the power to create through tohor time-oriented Av Torah commandments מלאכים; a Torah oath fundamentally requires שם ומלכות. But only Av tumah avoda zarah assumes that man can create Gods by means of swearing a Torah oath. This tumah yatzir/Yatzir Ha’Raw within the heart literally reads בראשית ברא אלהים. Attempts to create Gods יש מאין profanes ברית אש\בראשית. Herein the מאי נפקא מינא which distinguishes tohor middot from tumah middot; the Divine service of the chosen Cohen people forever separates Shabbat from Chol, זמן גרמא מצוות מן תולדות מצוות.
Its the discernment of fine distinctions which separates like from like which defines the concept of “understanding”. Upon this יסוד breathes the Divine Spirit רב חסד. This middah discerns time-oriented commandments which require k’vanna from תולדות commandments which do not require k’vanna. HaShem accepted the korban of 2nd born Hevel because he dedicated the korban לשם ברית. HaShem rejected the korban of Adam’s first born son Cain, because he dedicated his korban – as a reactionary barbeque unto Heaven. A fundamental מאי נפקא מינא.
The concepts discussed this text concerning Prophetic Mussar vs. Higher Criticism – likened to strategic elements in American football, where the interplay of different philosophies and techniques shapes the game’s outcomes. The interpretation of religious texts, particularly the T’NaCH and Talmud, through the lens of Protestant Higher Criticism highlights a significant divide similar to competing teams in sports. This comparison illustrates how differing interpretations can create rival perspectives akin to the dynamics observed in competitive sports.
The ethical conflicts discussed, like the rejection of Cain’s offering, resemble the moral decisions players and coaches face during the game. Decisions made in split seconds can have far-reaching implications, just as ethical considerations shape spiritual narratives. The tensions between different interpretations of faith parallel heated rivalries in American football, where teams vie for dominance based on different strategies—some focusing on offense (like allowing emotional decisions to guide Korban choices), while others emphasize defense (like the analytical approach of Higher Criticism, showing how such a path leads to a 4th down punt or worse a fumble or interception.)
Protestant Higher Criticism perceives the T’NaCH as a historical document rather than instruction which teaches mussar as it applies to the generations. The former compare to placing an idol upon a plinth pedestal and worshipping this superior theologically created being – as a God. Both Xtianity and Islam do exactly this with their treatment and behavior toward Jesus and Muhammad. Recall when western magazines mocked Muhammad and Muslims physically attacked both institutions and persons. Salman Rushdie’s “The Satanic Verses” declared blasphemous by many in the Muslim community which resulted in Rushdie hiding for his life. The Salem witch trials, between February 1692 and May 1693. The Puritans, held strong beliefs in the supernatural. They viewed the world as a battleground between God and the Devil, leading to fears of witches as instruments of evil.
Both this and that absolutely insist that Jesus and Muhammad lived as historical persons. Protestant Higher Criticism denounced the Hebrew T’NaCH as a fraud. They declared that multiple authors actually wrote the Torah and say the book of Isaiah over the span of centuries. This idea that “scholarship” must interpret T’NaCH literature as physical and historical rather than as mussar rebukes equally applicable to all persons in all generations separates Traditional Judaism from Conservative and Reform Judaism which likewise views the T’NaCH as primarily historical documents.
Hence how a person interprets the T’NaCH and Talmud pits two or more sets of opposing teams. The same equally applies scholarly disputes within the Talmud itself. Publication of the Rambam’s Yad Hazakah exploded into a Jewish Civil War whose impact destroyed generations of Jews even after Napoleon freed Western European Jews from the Catholic ghetto gulags of three Centuries. The Rambam Civil War pits judicial Talmudic common law against assimilated Greek/Roman statute laws. Four part פרדס inductive logic against three part Syllogism deductive logic. Just as sports teams build their programs around acquiring the best talented players, so to T’NaCH and Talmudic scholarship disputed and fought over down through the millennium.
The violent reactions to perceived blasphemy, such as attacks following disrespect towards religious figures (Muhammad, Jesus), parallel heated rivalries in sports, where fans quite often react vehemently against perceived slights to their teams or athletes in both American and European football. Competing interpretations of sacred texts create a dialogue similar to rival teams focusing on their strengths and weaknesses. The debate over Talmudic interpretation—judicial common law vs. foreign legislative statute law—resembles the endless strategizing that teams engage in to outmaneuver their opponents.
The tension between interpretations of the T’NaCH and Talmud can be likened to rivalry in sports, where competing teams navigate through a complex landscape of strategies, beliefs, and interpretations. Just as sports teams flourish through their scholar-like understanding of gameplay and competition, religious communities develop their unique culture, customs, identities and philosophies around the interpretation of sacred texts—creating a dynamic and ongoing dialogue, in fact – quite similar to violent conflict between the fans in the world of sports. A rich tapestry of beliefs and practices that, while distinct, often results in far wider fan clashes inside and outside both arenas and society. Violence influences wider cultural and social dynamics across American and European societies which inherit hatred which equals the Sunni Shiite rivalry which divides Arab and Muslim civilizations.
The worship of the שם השם לשמה
Philippians emphasizes grace, the joy of faith, and community support amidst challenges. This represents av tumah avoda zarah. The Torah defines faith as the pursuit of judicial justice. The Protocols of the Elders of Zionism Roman New Testament fraud counterfeit defines faith as belief in JeZeus as the son of God Zeus.
Philippians emphasizes grace, the joy of faith, and community support amidst challenges. This represents av tumah avoda zarah. The Torah defines faith as the pursuit of judicial justice. The Protocols of the Elders of Zionism Roman New Testament fraud counterfeit defines faith as belief in JeZeus as the son of God Zeus.
The latter av tumah avoda zarah, as expressed through the letterers of Philippians, emphasizes the belief which centralizes JeZeus, and later Muhammad and still later the prophet of Mormonism – as the definition of faith and salvation. No different from the Av tumah avoda zarah of Baal-King worship when compared to the Gods on Mt. Olympus. The fraudulent latter day saint Book of John directly compares to the Czarist secret police Protocols of the Elders of Zionism, published during the height of the Russian pogroms which exploded in the 1880s through the Bolshevik revolution.
Both Polytheism & Monotheism profane the First and Second Sinai commandments. The latter prostitutes the notion of some Universal God for all Mankind. The Torah teaches that only the 12 Tribes of Israel accepted the oath Sinai brit which creates continually the chosen Cohen people through tohor time-oriented commandments. The New Testament Protocols of the Elders of Zionism/UN Resolution 3379, never once mentions time-oriented commandments as Av mitzvot! Hence the avoda zarah of King Baal no different in essence than either branches of Xtian and Muslim monotheism; in point of fact – they all worship other Gods – and therefore profane the 2nd Sinai Commandment. Av tumah avoda zarah knows nothing of the first Sinai commandment which requires doing mitzvot לשמה.
The local god of Sinai stands separate and apart from the Universal God(s) preached by Xtian and Islamic KING Baal faiths. This local god vs those Universal God(s) compare to oil and water. Neither the New Testament nor the Koran dilutes the tohor nature of the local god of Israel because neither this nor that inherits the oath brit faith inheritance; neither has any knowledge of the oath sworn brit alliance cut by the Avot. Neither av tumah avoda zarah knows anything about the greatest of all Torah commandments which requires doing mitzvot לשמה – the first Sinai commandment. By extension, neither this nor that av tumah avoda zarah KING Baal worship knows anything about Av tohor time-oriented Torah commandments which create from nothing the Chosen Cohen people through the מלך\מלאך creations of Angel ambassadors by and through the holiness of time-oriented Av Torah commandments.
Doing mitzvot לשמה does not mean “focusing on the mitzvot done for their own sake”. A fundamental error. Doing mitzvot לשמה entails differentiating blowing the Divine Presence Spirit through the Yatzir HaTov within the heart from translating words in the place of the Sinai first commandment שם השם. The ערב רב who lacked fear of אלהים exemplify the eternal mitzva to war against Amalek; interpreted to mean the sin of the Golden Calf av tumah avoda zarah as expressed later through the KING Baal faith. Assimilated and intermarried Israelites – known as “the mixed multitudes” which came out of Egypt – they translated the Divine Presence Spirit Name which only the Yatzir HaTov within the heart can dedicate as holy through breath from word translations. The time-oriented mitzva of blowing the Shofar serves as a משנה תורה בנין אב which defines the dedication of tohor spirits dedicated by the Yatzir HaTov within the heart. The Torah openly teaches that nothing in the Earth, Seas or Heaven compares to the שם השם לשמה – how much more so word translations like אלהים, JeZeus, or Allah.
More bollocks!!
fart
Oaf pig, you have no eyes.
Just as Baal worshipers prioritized wealth and earthly gains, JeZeus warns the rich about the perils of reliance on material wealth. But whereas the Books of the NaCH Prophets prioritizes pursuit of righteous judicial courtroom justice, not so the plagiarized gospel (Protocols of the Elders of Zionism) Roman forgery.
The Gospels plagiarize the T’NaCH. A classic example the 40 day fast of JeZeus in the Sinai desert. Which attempts to duplicate the revelation of the Torah at Sinai and Elijah’s fleeing to the wilderness away from the wrath of the foreign Queen of Israel after the public slaughter of the prophets of Baal.
Such plagiarism seeks to prove that JeZeus “fulfilled” the words of the prophets. Ignorant and oblivious to the simple fact that prophets do not predict the future as does witchcraft but rather commands prophetic mussar applicable – across the board – to all generations of the Chosen Cohen people for all eternity. The gospel counterfeit thus compares to the Czar secret police “Protocols of the Elders of Zionism”.
Such replacement theology defines the Av tumah avoda zarah sin of the Golden Calf wherein the ערב רב assimilated and intermarried Israelites who came out of Egyptian slavery lacked all יראת אלהים, and hence these mixed multitudes who define the eternal war against Amalek Jews named their Golden Calf אלהים similar to which the NT and Koran gave new Names to their theologically created Gods.
This analogy which compares the New Testament to Baal, suggests that the creation of new theological constructs (such as the Christian understanding of God), akin to the Israelites assimilating pagan practices during their time in the wilderness. The cultural assimilation of Jews throughout the generations, and its impact on the perversion religious belief which prioritizes belief in theologically constructed Gods rather than the pursuit of judicial common law justice wherein the courts enforce fair compensation of damages inflicted by one Party upon another Party. Av tuma avoda zarah always prioritizes belief in Gods above the importance of righteous judicial common law courtrooms.
Stereotyping garbage!
Prove it. Like the saying goes: Say it. Don’t spray it. Idiot.
The phrase “pie in the sky” typically refers to unrealistic or overly optimistic ideas or promises that are unlikely to be fulfilled. In this context, the Harry Potter NT – Protocols of the Elders of Zion forgery. Post Shoah no Get out of Jail Free for the dead god JeZeus.
Silly racist religious nonsense! Grow up!
fuck you shit 4 brains
Racist supporters of genocide have NO right to use past genocides to support their position!
Exactly. Racist Fuck Off.
Know them by their fruits!!
Exactly. A Goy scripture for European pigs. Oink Oink Oink
I follow no scripture – that’s you!
Don’t care about you
That’s obvious
Agreed
Just as Baal worshipers prioritized wealth and earthly gains, JeZeus warns the rich about the perils of reliance on material wealth. But whereas the Books of the NaCH Prophets prioritizes pursuit of righteous judicial courtroom justice, not so the plagiarized gospel (Protocols of the Elders of Zionism) Roman forgery.
The Gospels plagiarize the T’NaCH. A classic example the 40 day fast of JeZeus in the Sinai desert. Which attempts to duplicate the revelation of the Torah at Sinai and Elijah’s fleeing to the wilderness away from the wrath of the foreign Queen of Israel after the public slaughter of the prophets of Baal.
Such plagiarism seeks to prove that JeZeus “fulfilled” the words of the prophets. Ignorant and oblivious to the simple fact that prophets do not predict the future as does witchcraft but rather commands prophetic mussar applicable – across the board – to all generations of the Chosen Cohen people for all eternity. The gospel counterfeit thus compares to the Czar secret police “Protocols of the Elders of Zionism”.
Such replacement theology defines the Av tumah avoda zarah sin of the Golden Calf wherein the ערב רב assimilated and intermarried Israelites who came out of Egyptian slavery lacked all יראת אלהים, and hence these mixed multitudes who define the eternal war against Amalek Jews named their Golden Calf אלהים similar to which the NT and Koran gave new Names to their theologically created Gods.
This analogy which compares the New Testament to Baal, suggests that the creation of new theological constructs (such as the Christian understanding of God), akin to the Israelites assimilating pagan practices during their time in the wilderness. The cultural assimilation of Jews throughout the generations, and its impact on the perversion religious belief which prioritizes belief in theologically constructed Gods rather than the pursuit of judicial common law justice wherein the courts enforce fair compensation of damages inflicted by one Party upon another Party. Av tuma avoda zarah always prioritizes belief in Gods above the importance of righteous judicial common law courtrooms.
I leave you garbage up for people to laugh at.
I laugh at you all the time.
That’s two of us laughing then.
A butt has two cheeks.
Islamic Worship Compared to Baal Worship and Its Theological Implications. Both Monotheism and Polytheism profane the First & Second Sinai commandments. Strict monotheism as Islam declares profanes the 2nd Sinai commandment and all the Books of the NaCH, which validates the Av tumah worship of other Gods. Sinai as Oath Law. Not any Theology which creates Gods.
The assertion that Islam operates similarly to Baal worship alongside Christianity raises substantial theological discussions regarding the essence of divinity in these faiths. Both Islam and Christianity can be critiqued for adopting practices seen as disconnected from earlier biblical traditions. The post-Shoah critique highlights the inadequacy of modern biblical translations and the tragic consequences faced by various branches of Xtianity. The post-Shoah critique highlights the inadequacy of modern biblical translations and the tragic consequences faced by various branches of Xtianity. Islam cut an alliance with Nazism during WWII and thereafter when the Arabs attempted to complete the Nazi Shoah in both 1948 and again in 1967.
Leaders, such as Grand Mufti Muhammad Amin al-Husseini, sought to oppose British colonial rule and perceived Jewish influence in League of Nations 1922 Palestine Mandate as European colonialism. The Lutheran Church in Germany expressed support for Nazi ideology, seeing it as compatible with nationalist sentiments. FDR supported the 1939 White Paper by closing off American Ports to European Jewish refugees. No Xtian denominational leader denounced FDR’s decision.
Lutheran leaders supported Nazi policies based upon the writings of Martin Luther himself. The closure of American ports to European Jewish refugees effectively restricted escape routes at a crucial time leading up to the Shoah. The lack of denouncement from major Christian denominational leaders regarding FDR’s policies indicates complex relationships between faith, politics, and social justice. For the opportunistic Church, whether Pope Pius XII permitting the Nazi slaughter of all the Jews of Rome or Protestant denominations in America who prioritized national interests over humanitarian principles, the bankruptcy of Xtain faith – total and complete.
Monotheism collapses all nations under one universal deity. Erases the oath-based distinction between Israel’s God and others. Violates על פני — the prohibition against universalizing HaShem. Islamic tawḥīd claims absolute unity of Allah as Creator of all peoples. The Torah’s second commandment forbids worship “על פני” — literally, “in My Presence,” meaning before or instead of the Name revealed at Sinai.
By rejecting HaShem’s particular Name and covenantal peoplehood, tawḥīd, together with the Nicene Creed Trinity, both theological creeds endorse a universalization of God which annuls the oath alliance cut with the Chosen Cohen people created continually through Av tohor time-oriented Commandments as defined through the first Book of the Torah בראשית. Thus, even though Islam rejects idolatry in the physical sense, it commits avoda zarah in the juridical sense — transferring divine authority from the local brit haaretz (oath-land) to a universal god divorced from the oath sworn to the Avot to create יש מאין the chosen Cohen people throughout all generations.
Tanakh recognizes that other nations have their own deities and courts — “כי כל העמים ילכו איש בשם אלהיו, ואנחנו נלך בשם ה׳ אלהינו לעולם ועד” (Micah 4:5). Goyim worship, by definition, other Gods. Neither the NT nor Koran ever once bring the שם השם לשמה. Therefore Islam’s tawhid approximates Baal kingship; Xtianity’s Trinity too exposed as pagan syncretism, substitute theology.
The First and Second Dibrot the ultimate constitutional clauses: they create an exclusive legal allegiance (שם ומלכות) for the chosen Cohen people. These two commandments shape and establish Torah common law as jurisdictional; who exercises sovereign law over the Cohen people and their oath brit land. Collapsing all nations under one universal Allah erases Israel’s Sinai brit Name and oath-land; it replaces particular brit obligations, specifically to pursue judicial common law justice, with abstract, cosmopolitan deity-claims of faith(also violates the second commandment by removing the “על פני” juridical boundary). Post Shoah Arab propaganda and UN Resolution 2334 openly ignore Jewish rule during the first and second Commonwealths.
At root, avoda zarah is not the worship of idols but the misplacement of sovereignty. When divine law is detached from its oath-based Name and judicial system, worship itself becomes alien service. Islam’s tawḥīd and Christianity’s Trinity thus both constitute juridical heresies: the former by erasing all distinctions (universal monarchy), the latter by introducing an ontological multiplicity (divine oligarchy). Both produce the same consequence: a moral universe without brit justice. No church or mosque has ever stood before a Sanhedrin-like court to restore the damages of centuries of bloodshed. That absence marks their worship as alien.
Weigh the Five Solas through the Lens of Protestant Reformation consequent to the 30 Year War. More Europeans died in that blood bath, comparatively matched till the horrors of WWI. Xtianity has a very long history of utter barbarism and moral depravity.
1. Sola rejects the autocracy of the Pope and his opposing Protestant Ministers. Sola Scriptura challenged the Catholic Church’s authority and tradition as co-equal to Scripture. Post Shoah the sophomoric bible translations proven to be tits on a boar hog. All branches of Xtianity refuted, disgraced, and killed by the Shoah.
2. Sola Fide replaced a works-based righteousness with faith as the sole criterion. Pie in the sky. Faith according to the language of the Written Torah – pursuit of judicial Sanhedrin courtroom common law justice which sanctifies the restoration of damages inflicted upon other(s) in order to restore trust among the Jewish people. The av tumah avoda zarah substitute theology where “faith in God” substitutes and replace fair resolution of damages inflicted – an utter av tumah abomination of avoda zarah.
3. Sola Gratia emphasizes salvation as a divine gift rather than a human achievement. According to the Torah the 5th Oral Torah middah/attribute a broad based tohor dedication inclusive of patience, discernment of ones’ own destiny walk. The false translation of חנון as ”grace”, as false as the translation of brit into covenant.
To swear a Torah brit requires making a Torah oath through שם ומלכות. The NT never once includes the Name of the first Sinai commandment. Kingship refers to “direction”. A person dedicates a tohor middah, say חנון לשמה to influence his future behavioral actions with family, friends, and neighbors in the future. For example following the brit cut between the pieces where Avraham cut a brit (oath alliance) with HaShem (a local god NOT a Universal God), Avraham understood his destiny walk before El Shaddai through brit melah/circumcision.
The Apostle Paul declared that circumcision – no longer the destiny walk before El Shaddai. But based upon the 2nd Sinai Commandment, clearly the Apostle Paul worshipped some other God. The Nicene Council defined the God worshipped by Paul as a mysterious Trinity God. Uncircumcised Xtians did not walk down the say destiny path as Jews. Their idolatry of Grace rejected the oblication upon courts of law to make fair restitution of damages. No European courtroom ever forced the Church fathers – Catholic or Protestant – to stand before the bar for war crimes.
4. Solus Christus asserts Christ’s exclusive mediatorship, negating the intercession of saints. Solus Christus asserts Christ’s exclusive mediatorship, negating the intercession of saints. This substitute theology replaces Avraham, Yitzak, and Yaacov as the fathers of the chosen Cohen people and replaces it with a false messiah which ignores the Moshiach dedication to rule the oath sworn land with righteous judicial justice. This doctrine declares that the Xtian church has succeeded Israel in God’s Grace destiny plan. Yet fails to address the Name of the local god revealed in the first Sinai commandment.
The Oral Torah commandment of Moshiach interprets the Written Torah, based upon the positive commandment precedents that Moshe anointed the House of Aaron with oil, and Aaron anoints korbanot with oil. This anointing with oil constitutes as the mitzva of Moshiach. It begs the Oral Torah question? Anointed for what specific sanctification לשמה? The Oral Torah interprets the mitzva of Moshiach to mean anointed to rule the oath sworn lands with judicial justice. Clearly the NT destiny walk diverges from the Jewish Cohen people destiny walk.
5. Soli Deo Gloria shifts focus from church institutions to God’s glory in all aspects of life. God’s glory understood a God as a Universal God. This patent av tumah avoda zarah rejects the first Sinai Commandment, wherein only the 12 Tribes of Israel accepted the Torah revelation. Sinai defines this “glory לשמה. The divergent destiny path taken by the Church – both Catholic and Protestant – directly comparable to the path of Baal worship. Under this more ancient av tumah avoda zarah Baal also referred this God as king.
More bollocks!!
fart
Israel’s recent diplomatic posture reflects a sharp pivot away from traditional UN frameworks — particularly Resolutions 242 and 338 — and toward the Abraham Accords as its preferred basis for regional peace.
Rejection of UN Resolutions 242 & 338: These resolutions have long underpinned the two-state solution framework, supported by the UN, EU, and Arab League. The directly violate direct negotiations between Israel and Arab states in favor of revisionist history which declares that Israel remains a UN Protectorate territory ruled by international committee ie UN Resolutions.
The Abraham Accords represent a complete break from land-for-peace diplomacy. Israeli diplomacy prioritizes that Arab countries must fundamentally validate the objective of Zionism: Jewish equal rights to achieve self-determination as the 1922 League of Nations Palestine Mandate and the 1948 UN Resolution 181, including the 2/3rds majority of Member states UN Resolution permanently rejects any further UN attempt to impose diplomatic solutions through UN Committee Proxy. Israeli Independence fundamentally rejects any UN diplomatic role in determination of Israeli strategic and tactical diplomatic decisions.
The Abraham Accords, signed in 2020 with UAE, Bahrain, Morocco, and Sudan: focus on economic, security, and diplomatic normalization without requiring territorial concessions. Clear proof that shalom – quite possible without UN mediation or Palestinian dhimmy Arab non State preconditions. Arabs lost the 1948 and 1967 Wars. Full Stop. No revisionist history of these cold hard facts permitted. UN Resolutions 242, 338 etc represent UN Revisionist history which pretends that Israel lost these two wars to the Arab hostile rejection of Zionism, as expressed in UN Resolution 3379: Zionism is Racism.
Israel has increasingly criticized European states — especially London and Paris — for treating it as if it were still under UN mandate status, implying a lack of sovereignty. Furthermore, the long term objective of the Abraham Peace Accords: that a majority of Arab countries across the Middle East and North Africa recognize Israel with the Primary objective of forcing the UN itself to publicly recognize Israel as a country within the Middle East community of Nations. Israel rejects the UN Apartheid policy which excludes Israel as a member State of the Middle East voting block of nations within the UN itself.
UN Resolutions which calls for recognitin of Palestinian statehood furthermore violates the Oslo Accords. Israel a fully sovereign nation, not subject to UN trusteeship. European pressure, specifically addressed through EU participation in UN SC & GA Resolution “committee votes”, Israel interprets as “Colonial-style interference.
Post the Oct 7th 2023 Abomination War, Game Over Israeli response to the recent UN GA vote supported by former West European or Nato allied states which demanded that Israel terminate its “unlawful presence” in Palestinian territories ignores the PLO 1964 Charter which did not refer to “occupied territories” as inclusive of either the Jordanian West Bank or the Egyptian Gaza. Therefore UN 242 & 338 rewrites and ignores the PLO charter of Yasser Arafat’s PLO while it recognizes the Oslo PA as an Indepedent Palestinian State!
Israeli diplomatic doctrine openly rejects the legacy of UN-imposed frameworks and repositions the Abraham Accords as the legitimate foundation for shalom. Shalom, unlike the noun Peace, a verb which requires trust. Peace as a noun only promotes the slight of hand propaganda rhetoric and nothing of real substance.
UN Resolutions 242 & 338, historically central to the two-state solution, viewed by Israel as tools of revisionist diplomacy that undermine its sovereignty. They falsely imply Israel lost the 1948 and 1967 wars and remain under international trusteeship — a notion Israel categorically rejects.
Israel interprets these resolutions as relics of a UN system that seeks to impose outcomes via committee votes rather than direct negotiation. As such, they maintain UN Apartheid policies which adamentaly refuse to validate Zionism established through the League of Nations 1922 Palestine Mandate, based upon the Balfour Declaration signed between Israel and Britain. Since the British defeat in the 1956 War, Britain lost its status as a Great Power. Both Britain and France should not sit on the UN Secority Council as permanent members with veto powers. France lost WWII.
Israel requires direct face to face negotiations with any and all Arab Countries, based upon the latter’s recognition of political Zionism: Jewish equal rights to achieve self-determination in the Middle East and North Africa.
Arab states must recognize Jewish self-determination as rooted in the 1922 League of Nations Mandate and UN Resolution 181 (1947).
Full regional integration of Israel into the Middle East diplomatic bloc, forcing UN recognition of Israel as a legitimate regional actor.
All UN Resolutions demanding Israel withdraw from “unlawful presence” in Palestinian territories are seen as illegitimate. Israel’s “Game Over” response signals a final break with European and UN diplomatic frameworks.
London, Paris, and EU allies are accused of treating Israel as a UN mandate territory, perpetuating colonial-style interference. UN recognition of Palestinian statehood bypasses the Oslo framework, which requires bilateral negotiation.
PLO Charter (1964): Did not claim West Bank or Gaza — undermining the historical basis for current UN territorial claims. UN Resolution 3379: “Zionism is Racism” (revoked in 1991) remains a symbolic grievance in Israeli diplomatic memory. Game Over – Israel demands that Britain and France lose their Great Power status in the UN Security Council. British/EU imperialism\colonialism Israel categorically rejects. France lost WWII and both countries lost the 1956 Suez War. Solid proof that neither country qualifies as a great power. Furthermore Israel as a nuclear power, based upon UN hostility to the existence of political Zionism and the Jewish state, requires permanent member status on the Security Council inclusive of veto powers.
No wonder Israel and the USA don’t like the UN. The UN stands for moral principles, equality and peace.
Oink Oink
Just as Baal worshipers prioritized wealth and earthly gains, JeZeus warns the rich about the perils of reliance on material wealth. But whereas the Books of the NaCH Prophets prioritizes pursuit of righteous judicial courtroom justice, not so the plagiarized gospel (Protocols of the Elders of Zionism) Roman forgery.
The Gospels plagiarize the T’NaCH. A classic example the 40 day fast of JeZeus in the Sinai desert. Which attempts to duplicate the revelation of the Torah at Sinai and Elijah’s fleeing to the wilderness away from the wrath of the foreign Queen of Israel after the public slaughter of the prophets of Baal.
Such plagiarism seeks to prove that JeZeus “fulfilled” the words of the prophets. Ignorant and oblivious to the simple fact that prophets do not predict the future as does witchcraft but rather commands prophetic mussar applicable – across the board – to all generations of the Chosen Cohen people for all eternity. The gospel counterfeit thus compares to the Czar secret police “Protocols of the Elders of Zionism”.
Such replacement theology defines the Av tumah avoda zarah sin of the Golden Calf wherein the ערב רב assimilated and intermarried Israelites who came out of Egyptian slavery lacked all יראת אלהים, and hence these mixed multitudes who define the eternal war against Amalek Jews named their Golden Calf אלהים similar to which the NT and Koran gave new Names to their theologically created Gods.
This analogy which compares the New Testament to Baal, suggests that the creation of new theological constructs (such as the Christian understanding of God), akin to the Israelites assimilating pagan practices during their time in the wilderness. The cultural assimilation of Jews throughout the generations, and its impact on the perversion religious belief which prioritizes belief in theologically constructed Gods rather than the pursuit of judicial common law justice wherein the courts enforce fair compensation of damages inflicted by one Party upon another Party. Av tuma avoda zarah always prioritizes belief in Gods above the importance of righteous judicial common law courtrooms.
Stuck!!
Noise
So you can cut and paste!
hypocrite – Bollocks!!!
Based upon the response of my last article, the volume and diversity of reactions caused me to re-write a second part to the original document.
This 2nd Parsha of the Book of בראשית, Parshat Noach. The opening two Parshaot serve as an introduction of the Torah which formally begins with the 3rd Parsha – the introduction of Avraham the father of the chosen Cohen people. What do the opening first two Parshaot of בראשית introduce? This fundamentally basic question – it defines these two Parshaot.
Notice that the Torah introduces the Name אלהים rather than the שם השם לשמה. Herein serves as an introduction to the 7th Oral Torah middah רב חסד, which the Talmud interprets to mean as מאי נפקא מינא? The 7th Oral Torah attribute spirit distinguishes – something like as does the קידוש\הבדלה of shabbat the distinction between Av tohor time-oriented commandments from positive commandments. A fundamental מאי נפקא מינא wherein the Talmud discerns that the former Av Torah commandments require “k’vanna (an as yet undefined term which fundamentally requires definition) whereas the latter Torah mitzvot do not require k’vanna/כוונה.
The aggadic mussar story of the Book of בראשית, not at all challenged by the late 19th Century German Higher Criticism. The catastrophic events of the World Wars prompted a reevaluation of Enlightenment ideals, including the objectivity and rationality that underpinned Higher Critical methods. Scholars began to question the biases inherent in historical analysis. Post Shoah no more get out of jail free for Xtianity, with its Nazi rat-lines to prevent the execution of justice upon Nazi war criminals.
Fear of Heaven shapes the reputation of both Man in general and religious institutions in particular. The alliance between Lutheranism and Nazism during the Nazi regime in Germany presents a complex and troubling history which ultimately undermined late 19th Century German Higher Criticism. That both Catholic and Protestant Xtianity aided and assisted the Nazis. Pope Pius XII failed to even protest the Nazi slaughter of Rome’s Jews! Actions speak louder than priests or pastors screaming “Fear God”. The Nazi systematic slaughter of 75% of Western European Jewry while the Xtian church ignored oppression, theft, injustice and genocide permanently destroyed the good name of Xtianity.
Had the church condemned FDR’s decision to embrace Chamberlain’s White Paper and bar European refugees entrance to America perhaps the charge that the Xtian church lacks Fear of Heaven, would not stick to all eternity thereafter. Fear of Heaven, means protecting the Good Name reputation – just that simple. Post Shoah, Hitler and his Nazi SS mafia permanently destroyed the Good Name reputation of all branches of Xtianity; starting with German Protestant ‘Higher Criticism. Higher Criticism, which began to deconstruct traditional interpretations tied to authoritarian and nationalistic ideologies.
Perhaps the Talmud did not clarify crystal clear when Goyim abandoned all together the Brit faith and ipso facto worshipped other Gods. The בראשית aggadic mussar story therefore opens with אלהים כלל rather than the שם השם לשמה פרט. Why did HaShem accept the korban of young Hev’el and reject the Cohen First-born son Cain’s korban? The Torah revelation validate both types of korbanot! The Torah contains the רמז word ברית אש\בראשית. Just as the dispute between the two sons of Adam equally reflected in the רמז word ב’ ראשית. Rabbi Yechuda Ha’Nasi interprets the language of kre’a shma בכל לבבך\כם based upon the Torah precedent: ב’ ראשית, two opposing Yatzirot struggle within the heart like as did Esau and Yaacov wrestled within the womb of Rivka.
Therefore, when exactly did the Goyim reject the ברית אש\בראשית? Concerning the two korbanot dedicated by the two opposing sons of Adam, Hevel’s korban accepted because his k’vanna dedicated the korban through the Torah oath (שם ומלכות) in the Name of the Creation oath brit. Cain’s korban rejected because his korban lacked k’vanna. Hence the distinction between Av tohor time-oriented commandments which require k’vanna from positive תולדות commandments which do not require k’vanna. Do the תולדות follow the Avot? This defining מאי נפקא מינא detail both mesechtot Shabbat and Baba Kama ask – this very question! Clearly the distinction in the case of the two opposing “Yatzirot” of Adam: Doing mitzvot stam does not follow doing mitzvot with the k’vanna of “oath brit”.
ולשת גם הוא ילד בן ויקרא את שמו אנוש אז הוחל לקרא בשם השם.
Following the murder of Hevel, Chava the wife of Adam gave birth to a third son. This third son, who did he follow? The masoret of murdered Hevel or the masoret of Cain? Touching Enosh, the Tanna Targum Onkelos writes: בכן ביומוהי חלו בני אנשא מלצלאה בשמא דהשם. Rashi, an early major Reshon, interprets – אז הוחל. לשון חולין, לקרת את שמות האדם ואת שמות העצבים בשמו של הקדוש ברוך רבים. הוא, לעשותן אלילים ולקרותן אלהות
Recall that the HaShem permitted Adam to call the created animals names in the last p’suk prior to the third aliya to the Torah. But the first born cohen son of שת, the son born after Cain murder Hevel. The Targum employs the verb מלצלאה בשמא דהשם. They prayed to HaShem. Whereas the Rashi explanation the 2nd generation אנוש, comparable to Chava’s: ותאמר האשה אל הנחש מפרי עץ הגן נאכל ומפרי העץ אשר בתוך הגן אמר אלהים לא תאכלו ממנו ולא תגעו בן פן תמתון. Chava added on to the original commandment as did the 2nd generation of Adam, Enosh, who started naming the stars with Divine Names. Just as the snake deceived Chava so to later down stream generations did a ירידות הדורות domino effect and stared worshipping other אלהים. This action of avoda zarah created Man created Gods in the image of Man.
Mesechta Sanhedrin asks the famous question: What caused the Flood disaster in the days of Noach? Answer ברית אש, the fire of the brit sworn oaths (שם ומלכות); the generation of Noach made false oaths! A Torah oath has the power to create through tohor time-oriented Av Torah commandments מלאכים; a Torah oath fundamentally requires שם ומלכות. But only Av tumah avoda zarah assumes that man can create Gods by means of swearing a Torah oath. This tumah yatzir/Yatzir Ha’Raw within the heart literally reads בראשית ברא אלהים. Attempts to create Gods יש מאין profanes ברית אש\בראשית. Herein the מאי נפקא מינא which distinguishes tohor middot from tumah middot; the Divine service of the chosen Cohen people forever separates Shabbat from Chol, זמן גרמא מצוות מן תולדות מצוות.
Its the discernment of fine distinctions which separates like from like which defines the concept of “understanding”. Upon this יסוד breathes the Divine Spirit רב חסד. This middah discerns time-oriented commandments which require k’vanna from תולדות commandments which do not require k’vanna. HaShem accepted the korban of 2nd born Hevel because he dedicated the korban לשם ברית. HaShem rejected the korban of Adam’s first born son Cain, because he dedicated his korban – as a reactionary barbeque unto Heaven. A fundamental מאי נפקא מינא.
The concepts discussed this text concerning Prophetic Mussar vs. Higher Criticism – likened to strategic elements in American football, where the interplay of different philosophies and techniques shapes the game’s outcomes. The interpretation of religious texts, particularly the T’NaCH and Talmud, through the lens of Protestant Higher Criticism highlights a significant divide similar to competing teams in sports. This comparison illustrates how differing interpretations can create rival perspectives akin to the dynamics observed in competitive sports.
The ethical conflicts discussed, like the rejection of Cain’s offering, resemble the moral decisions players and coaches face during the game. Decisions made in split seconds can have far-reaching implications, just as ethical considerations shape spiritual narratives. The tensions between different interpretations of faith parallel heated rivalries in American football, where teams vie for dominance based on different strategies—some focusing on offense (like allowing emotional decisions to guide Korban choices), while others emphasize defense (like the analytical approach of Higher Criticism, showing how such a path leads to a 4th down punt or worse a fumble or interception.)
Protestant Higher Criticism perceives the T’NaCH as a historical document rather than instruction which teaches mussar as it applies to the generations. The former compare to placing an idol upon a plinth pedestal and worshipping this superior theologically created being – as a God. Both Xtianity and Islam do exactly this with their treatment and behavior toward Jesus and Muhammad. Recall when western magazines mocked Muhammad and Muslims physically attacked both institutions and persons. Salman Rushdie’s “The Satanic Verses” declared blasphemous by many in the Muslim community which resulted in Rushdie hiding for his life. The Salem witch trials, between February 1692 and May 1693. The Puritans, held strong beliefs in the supernatural. They viewed the world as a battleground between God and the Devil, leading to fears of witches as instruments of evil.
Both this and that absolutely insist that Jesus and Muhammad lived as historical persons. Protestant Higher Criticism denounced the Hebrew T’NaCH as a fraud. They declared that multiple authors actually wrote the Torah and say the book of Isaiah over the span of centuries. This idea that “scholarship” must interpret T’NaCH literature as physical and historical rather than as mussar rebukes equally applicable to all persons in all generations separates Traditional Judaism from Conservative and Reform Judaism which likewise views the T’NaCH as primarily historical documents.
Hence how a person interprets the T’NaCH and Talmud pits two or more sets of opposing teams. The same equally applies scholarly disputes within the Talmud itself. Publication of the Rambam’s Yad Hazakah exploded into a Jewish Civil War whose impact destroyed generations of Jews even after Napoleon freed Western European Jews from the Catholic ghetto gulags of three Centuries. The Rambam Civil War pits judicial Talmudic common law against assimilated Greek/Roman statute laws. Four part פרדס inductive logic against three part Syllogism deductive logic. Just as sports teams build their programs around acquiring the best talented players, so to T’NaCH and Talmudic scholarship disputed and fought over down through the millennium.
The violent reactions to perceived blasphemy, such as attacks following disrespect towards religious figures (Muhammad, Jesus), parallel heated rivalries in sports, where fans quite often react vehemently against perceived slights to their teams or athletes in both American and European football. Competing interpretations of sacred texts create a dialogue similar to rival teams focusing on their strengths and weaknesses. The debate over Talmudic interpretation—judicial common law vs. foreign legislative statute law—resembles the endless strategizing that teams engage in to outmaneuver their opponents.
The tension between interpretations of the T’NaCH and Talmud can be likened to rivalry in sports, where competing teams navigate through a complex landscape of strategies, beliefs, and interpretations. Just as sports teams flourish through their scholar-like understanding of gameplay and competition, religious communities develop their unique culture, customs, identities and philosophies around the interpretation of sacred texts—creating a dynamic and ongoing dialogue, in fact – quite similar to violent conflict between the fans in the world of sports. A rich tapestry of beliefs and practices that, while distinct, often results in far wider fan clashes inside and outside both arenas and society. Violence influences wider cultural and social dynamics across American and European societies which inherit hatred which equals the Sunni Shiite rivalry which divides Arab and Muslim civilizations.
Just as Baal worshipers prioritized wealth and earthly gains, JeZeus warns the rich about the perils of reliance on material wealth. But whereas the Books of the NaCH Prophets prioritizes pursuit of righteous judicial courtroom justice, not so the plagiarized gospel (Protocols of the Elders of Zionism) Roman forgery.
The Gospels plagiarize the T’NaCH. A classic example the 40 day fast of JeZeus in the Sinai desert. Which attempts to duplicate the revelation of the Torah at Sinai and Elijah’s fleeing to the wilderness away from the wrath of the foreign Queen of Israel after the public slaughter of the prophets of Baal.
Such plagiarism seeks to prove that JeZeus “fulfilled” the words of the prophets. Ignorant and oblivious to the simple fact that prophets do not predict the future as does witchcraft but rather commands prophetic mussar applicable – across the board – to all generations of the Chosen Cohen people for all eternity. The gospel counterfeit thus compares to the Czar secret police “Protocols of the Elders of Zionism”.
Such replacement theology defines the Av tumah avoda zarah sin of the Golden Calf wherein the ערב רב assimilated and intermarried Israelites who came out of Egyptian slavery lacked all יראת אלהים, and hence these mixed multitudes who define the eternal war against Amalek Jews named their Golden Calf אלהים similar to which the NT and Koran gave new Names to their theologically created Gods.
This analogy which compares the New Testament to Baal, suggests that the creation of new theological constructs (such as the Christian understanding of God), akin to the Israelites assimilating pagan practices during their time in the wilderness. The cultural assimilation of Jews throughout the generations, and its impact on the perversion religious belief which prioritizes belief in theologically constructed Gods rather than the pursuit of judicial common law justice wherein the courts enforce fair compensation of damages inflicted by one Party upon another Party. Av tuma avoda zarah always prioritizes belief in Gods above the importance of righteous judicial common law courtrooms.
Racist junk!
no refutation here only a two word reaction of brain dead stupidity.
Coming from a Fascist that’s a compliment
Noise grunts
Blood Libels defines the Yatzir Ha’Raw spirits within the hearts of all Goyim throughout the generations. Post the Oct 7th Abomination massacre by Hamas, almost immediately came the blood libel slander of “Genocide”. But post the ’67 War the blood libel revisionist history introduced by both Britain and France: the 242 declaration that peace only achievable in the Middle East through a UN “internatioanal law” dictate upon Israel!
The semantic shift in the phrase “territoires occupés” between 1964 and post-1967 UN usage exposes the deliberate retroactive redefinition that Arab and European diplomats engineered after the Six-Day War. The Palestine National Covenant (1964)—ratified three years before 242—defines “Palestine” as the “occupied” land within the British Mandate borders, excluding the West Bank (then under Jordanian sovereignty) and Gaza (under Egyptian control).
Weigh now the hostile blood libel language of “the” French UN 242 post war revisionist history. The French official text uses “des territoires occupés” — which in French usage is normally read as “from “the” occupied territories” (i.e., with “the” definite sense). That phrasing more naturally supports the French holier than thou, reading that Israel should withdraw from the territories (the entirety of those occupied in 1948! The French wording and the preamble’s “inadmissibility of acquisition of territory by war” buttress an interpretation that envisages full withdrawal, which includes even West Jerusalem! Recall the Vatican demanded in 1947 the Jerusalem exist as an Internationally ruled City, similar to Post WWII Berlin. Many continental and Arab states, and many subsequent UN framings, preferred this reading.
The French text gave political cover to states and blocs pressing for “the” full Israeli withdrawal from “48 occupied territories”; the English text gave the drafters (Caradon, Goldberg et al.) a way to frame 242 as a negotiating framework rather than an immediate, absolute mandate for total withdrawal from ’67 “recaptured territories”. A fundamental presumption by both London and Paris. Both versions fundamentally err. Israel simply not a UN protectorate territory wherein the UN determines its borders like as attempted by the Peel Commission. Britain and France, nor any other UN Security Council States, determine the international borders of Israel. And how much more so the Capital City of Israel. Yet these hostile states promote revisionist history and refuse to recognize Jerusalem as the Capital of Israel! Both versions of UN 242 an utter fraud.
Hence the distinction between the British and French versions of 242 represents a Good Cop vs. Bad Cop propaganda rhetoric to justify the dismantling of Zionism’s pre WWI platform that Jews have equal rights to achieve self-determination in the Middle East. All Arab Israeli Wars ever fought, including the Oct 7th Abomination War reflects the Blood Libel Racism spirits which breaths within the Yatzir Ha’Raw hearts of all Goyim – both Arab/Muslims and European/Russians.
racism. you should be ashamed.
Johnny Foreigner publicly fucks his dead mother and decries that Israelis should feel shame for winning the Gaza War. LOL what a fool.
LOL illiterate racist fool!
This mother fucker jacks off in public … again.
Blood Libels defines the Yatzir Ha’Raw spirits within the hearts of all Goyim throughout the generations. Post the Oct 7th Abomination massacre by Hamas, almost immediately came the blood libel slander of “Genocide”. But post the ’67 War the blood libel revisionist history introduced by both Britain and France: the 242 declaration that peace only achievable in the Middle East through a UN “internatioanal law” dictate upon Israel!
The semantic shift in the phrase “territoires occupés” between 1964 and post-1967 UN usage exposes the deliberate retroactive redefinition that Arab and European diplomats engineered after the Six-Day War. The Palestine National Covenant (1964)—ratified three years before 242—defines “Palestine” as the “occupied” land within the British Mandate borders, excluding the West Bank (then under Jordanian sovereignty) and Gaza (under Egyptian control).
Weigh now the hostile blood libel language of “the” French UN 242 post war revisionist history. The French official text uses “des territoires occupés” — which in French usage is normally read as “from “the” occupied territories” (i.e., with “the” definite sense). That phrasing more naturally supports the French holier than thou, reading that Israel should withdraw from the territories (the entirety of those occupied in 1948! The French wording and the preamble’s “inadmissibility of acquisition of territory by war” buttress an interpretation that envisages full withdrawal, which includes even West Jerusalem! Recall the Vatican demanded in 1947 the Jerusalem exist as an Internationally ruled City, similar to Post WWII Berlin. Many continental and Arab states, and many subsequent UN framings, preferred this reading.
The French text gave political cover to states and blocs pressing for “the” full Israeli withdrawal from “48 occupied territories”; the English text gave the drafters (Caradon, Goldberg et al.) a way to frame 242 as a negotiating framework rather than an immediate, absolute mandate for total withdrawal from ’67 “recaptured territories”. A fundamental presumption by both London and Paris. Both versions fundamentally err. Israel simply not a UN protectorate territory wherein the UN determines its borders like as attempted by the Peel Commission. Britain and France, nor any other UN Security Council States, determine the international borders of Israel. And how much more so the Capital City of Israel. Yet these hostile states promote revisionist history and refuse to recognize Jerusalem as the Capital of Israel! Both versions of UN 242 an utter fraud.
Hence the distinction between the British and French versions of 242 represents a Good Cop vs. Bad Cop propaganda rhetoric to justify the dismantling of Zionism’s pre WWI platform that Jews have equal rights to achieve self-determination in the Middle East. All Arab Israeli Wars ever fought, including the Oct 7th Abomination War reflects the Blood Libel Racism spirits which breaths within the Yatzir Ha’Raw hearts of all Goyim – both Arab/Muslims and European/Russians.
no wonder you are such a Nazi. You’re whole perspective is racist.
Johnny Foreigner publicly fucks his dead mother. Ewwwwwwwwwwww
LOL illiterate racist fool!
This mother fucker jacks off in public … again.
lol – it’s a hobby
Pervert
LOL. Racist.
Pig fucking pervert.
LOL – nothing wrong with pigs. They have corkscrew penises!
fuck you pig shit 4 brains
Racist supporters of genocide have NO right to use past genocides to support their position!
Exactly. Racist Fuck Off.
Shut the fuck up with your racist whining about ALL Europeans being guilty of the Shoah – we weren’t even alive then! So racist and stupid – especially from one who openly supports the present-day genocide of the Palestinians.
Oink Oink Oink coward pig.
Racist fool who perpetuates hate, division, war and genocide. I curse you and the fascist doctrine you live by.
Oaf-er revisionist history jerk.
Senseless racist stupidity.
Oink Oink
Just as Baal worshipers prioritized wealth and earthly gains, JeZeus warns the rich about the perils of reliance on material wealth. But whereas the Books of the NaCH Prophets prioritizes pursuit of righteous judicial courtroom justice, not so the plagiarized gospel (Protocols of the Elders of Zionism) Roman forgery.
The Gospels plagiarize the T’NaCH. A classic example the 40 day fast of JeZeus in the Sinai desert. Which attempts to duplicate the revelation of the Torah at Sinai and Elijah’s fleeing to the wilderness away from the wrath of the foreign Queen of Israel after the public slaughter of the prophets of Baal.
Such plagiarism seeks to prove that JeZeus “fulfilled” the words of the prophets. Ignorant and oblivious to the simple fact that prophets do not predict the future as does witchcraft but rather commands prophetic mussar applicable – across the board – to all generations of the Chosen Cohen people for all eternity. The gospel counterfeit thus compares to the Czar secret police “Protocols of the Elders of Zionism”.
Such replacement theology defines the Av tumah avoda zarah sin of the Golden Calf wherein the ערב רב assimilated and intermarried Israelites who came out of Egyptian slavery lacked all יראת אלהים, and hence these mixed multitudes who define the eternal war against Amalek Jews named their Golden Calf אלהים similar to which the NT and Koran gave new Names to their theologically created Gods.
This analogy which compares the New Testament to Baal, suggests that the creation of new theological constructs (such as the Christian understanding of God), akin to the Israelites assimilating pagan practices during their time in the wilderness. The cultural assimilation of Jews throughout the generations, and its impact on the perversion religious belief which prioritizes belief in theologically constructed Gods rather than the pursuit of judicial common law justice wherein the courts enforce fair compensation of damages inflicted by one Party upon another Party. Av tuma avoda zarah always prioritizes belief in Gods above the importance of righteous judicial common law courtrooms.
More senseless stupidity.
Refute it then. All you do – Name Call. Idiot.
Israel’s recent diplomatic posture reflects a sharp pivot away from traditional UN frameworks — particularly Resolutions 242 and 338 — and toward the Abraham Accords as its preferred basis for regional peace.
Rejection of UN Resolutions 242 & 338: These resolutions have long underpinned the two-state solution framework, supported by the UN, EU, and Arab League. The directly violate direct negotiations between Israel and Arab states in favor of revisionist history which declares that Israel remains a UN Protectorate territory ruled by international committee ie UN Resolutions.
The Abraham Accords represent a complete break from land-for-peace diplomacy. Israeli diplomacy prioritizes that Arab countries must fundamentally validate the objective of Zionism: Jewish equal rights to achieve self-determination as the 1922 League of Nations Palestine Mandate and the 1948 UN Resolution 181, including the 2/3rds majority of Member states UN Resolution permanently rejects any further UN attempt to impose diplomatic solutions through UN Committee Proxy. Israeli Independence fundamentally rejects any UN diplomatic role in determination of Israeli strategic and tactical diplomatic decisions.
The Abraham Accords, signed in 2020 with UAE, Bahrain, Morocco, and Sudan: focus on economic, security, and diplomatic normalization without requiring territorial concessions. Clear proof that shalom – quite possible without UN mediation or Palestinian dhimmy Arab non State preconditions. Arabs lost the 1948 and 1967 Wars. Full Stop. No revisionist history of these cold hard facts permitted. UN Resolutions 242, 338 etc represent UN Revisionist history which pretends that Israel lost these two wars to the Arab hostile rejection of Zionism, as expressed in UN Resolution 3379: Zionism is Racism.
Israel has increasingly criticized European states — especially London and Paris — for treating it as if it were still under UN mandate status, implying a lack of sovereignty. Furthermore, the long term objective of the Abraham Peace Accords: that a majority of Arab countries across the Middle East and North Africa recognize Israel with the Primary objective of forcing the UN itself to publicly recognize Israel as a country within the Middle East community of Nations. Israel rejects the UN Apartheid policy which excludes Israel as a member State of the Middle East voting block of nations within the UN itself.
UN Resolutions which calls for recognitin of Palestinian statehood furthermore violates the Oslo Accords. Israel a fully sovereign nation, not subject to UN trusteeship. European pressure, specifically addressed through EU participation in UN SC & GA Resolution “committee votes”, Israel interprets as “Colonial-style interference.
Post the Oct 7th 2023 Abomination War, Game Over Israeli response to the recent UN GA vote supported by former West European or Nato allied states which demanded that Israel terminate its “unlawful presence” in Palestinian territories ignores the PLO 1964 Charter which did not refer to “occupied territories” as inclusive of either the Jordanian West Bank or the Egyptian Gaza. Therefore UN 242 & 338 rewrites and ignores the PLO charter of Yasser Arafat’s PLO while it recognizes the Oslo PA as an Indepedent Palestinian State!
Israeli diplomatic doctrine openly rejects the legacy of UN-imposed frameworks and repositions the Abraham Accords as the legitimate foundation for shalom. Shalom, unlike the noun Peace, a verb which requires trust. Peace as a noun only promotes the slight of hand propaganda rhetoric and nothing of real substance.
UN Resolutions 242 & 338, historically central to the two-state solution, viewed by Israel as tools of revisionist diplomacy that undermine its sovereignty. They falsely imply Israel lost the 1948 and 1967 wars and remain under international trusteeship — a notion Israel categorically rejects.
Israel interprets these resolutions as relics of a UN system that seeks to impose outcomes via committee votes rather than direct negotiation. As such, they maintain UN Apartheid policies which adamentaly refuse to validate Zionism established through the League of Nations 1922 Palestine Mandate, based upon the Balfour Declaration signed between Israel and Britain. Since the British defeat in the 1956 War, Britain lost its status as a Great Power. Both Britain and France should not sit on the UN Secority Council as permanent members with veto powers. France lost WWII.
Israel requires direct face to face negotiations with any and all Arab Countries, based upon the latter’s recognition of political Zionism: Jewish equal rights to achieve self-determination in the Middle East and North Africa.
Arab states must recognize Jewish self-determination as rooted in the 1922 League of Nations Mandate and UN Resolution 181 (1947).
Full regional integration of Israel into the Middle East diplomatic bloc, forcing UN recognition of Israel as a legitimate regional actor.
All UN Resolutions demanding Israel withdraw from “unlawful presence” in Palestinian territories are seen as illegitimate. Israel’s “Game Over” response signals a final break with European and UN diplomatic frameworks.
London, Paris, and EU allies are accused of treating Israel as a UN mandate territory, perpetuating colonial-style interference. UN recognition of Palestinian statehood bypasses the Oslo framework, which requires bilateral negotiation.
PLO Charter (1964): Did not claim West Bank or Gaza — undermining the historical basis for current UN territorial claims. UN Resolution 3379: “Zionism is Racism” (revoked in 1991) remains a symbolic grievance in Israeli diplomatic memory. Game Over – Israel demands that Britain and France lose their Great Power status in the UN Security Council. British/EU imperialism\colonialism Israel categorically rejects. France lost WWII and both countries lost the 1956 Suez War. Solid proof that neither country qualifies as a great power. Furthermore Israel as a nuclear power, based upon UN hostility to the existence of political Zionism and the Jewish state, requires permanent member status on the Security Council inclusive of veto powers.
No wonder Israel and the USA don’t like the UN. The UN stands for moral principles, equality and peace.
Oink Oink
Just as Baal worshipers prioritized wealth and earthly gains, JeZeus warns the rich about the perils of reliance on material wealth. But whereas the Books of the NaCH Prophets prioritizes pursuit of righteous judicial courtroom justice, not so the plagiarized gospel (Protocols of the Elders of Zionism) Roman forgery.
The Gospels plagiarize the T’NaCH. A classic example the 40 day fast of JeZeus in the Sinai desert. Which attempts to duplicate the revelation of the Torah at Sinai and Elijah’s fleeing to the wilderness away from the wrath of the foreign Queen of Israel after the public slaughter of the prophets of Baal.
Such plagiarism seeks to prove that JeZeus “fulfilled” the words of the prophets. Ignorant and oblivious to the simple fact that prophets do not predict the future as does witchcraft but rather commands prophetic mussar applicable – across the board – to all generations of the Chosen Cohen people for all eternity. The gospel counterfeit thus compares to the Czar secret police “Protocols of the Elders of Zionism”.
Such replacement theology defines the Av tumah avoda zarah sin of the Golden Calf wherein the ערב רב assimilated and intermarried Israelites who came out of Egyptian slavery lacked all יראת אלהים, and hence these mixed multitudes who define the eternal war against Amalek Jews named their Golden Calf אלהים similar to which the NT and Koran gave new Names to their theologically created Gods.
This analogy which compares the New Testament to Baal, suggests that the creation of new theological constructs (such as the Christian understanding of God), akin to the Israelites assimilating pagan practices during their time in the wilderness. The cultural assimilation of Jews throughout the generations, and its impact on the perversion religious belief which prioritizes belief in theologically constructed Gods rather than the pursuit of judicial common law justice wherein the courts enforce fair compensation of damages inflicted by one Party upon another Party. Av tuma avoda zarah always prioritizes belief in Gods above the importance of righteous judicial common law courtrooms.
LOL.
No response. Ha Ha sucks being brain dead. Here’s a response made to an Xtian believer
timmieblaze quoting 1 Corinthians 1:18-25, the entire machloket between the oath brit which creates the Chosen Cohen people through the holiness of Av tohor time-oriented commandments vs the Pauline “grafted” propaganda. If a person seeks to convert, that ger must accept the entire Torah, just as did Israel at Sinai. Yet Paul substituted Baal JeZeus in the stead of the Torah pursuit of righteous common law Sanhedrin justice which commits to pursue fair restitution of damages inflicted by bnai brit Jews upon other bnai brit Jews.
Paul’s rhetoric inverts prophetic logic: he substitutes mystical “belief in the crucified god” for mishpat and tzedek as the core of divine wisdom. By dismissing reasoned argument and textual law as “worldly wisdom,” he severed theology from judicial accountability – that’s Baal worship Av tumah avoda zarah – the violation of the 2nd Sinai commandment. Just that simple.
Quoting the NT serves only as a pretence which ignores all together why Jews view the NT as simply an extension of Baal worship avoda zarah which strives to replace the brit din with emotional faith in a much later Nicene Creed Trinity God. Sorry dogmatic confession does not replace judicial common law courts which have a Torah Constitutional mandate to make a Legislative review over the New Testament. The Oral Torah rules that the New Testament simply a modified version of Baal worship.
Universal love shares no common ground with brit am segulah. Just that simple. No fancy dance’n. Faith – the pursuit of righteous justice NOT belief in some much later Nicene Creed church dictate.
In summation, the Torah Constitution establishes brit Israel as the chosen Cohen people. Yom Tov Yom Kippur substantiates and serves as a legal precedent. Paul, a Jewish agent provocateur sent to undermine and promote Civil War in Rome Italy just as the Roman Protocols of the Elders of Zionism forgery sought to promote Civil War among and between the different sects within Jewish society during the latter days of the 2nd Judean Republic. The Baal gospel avoda zarah seeks to blow out the previous Jewish Civil War wherein the P’rushim prevailed and dedicated the lights of Hanukkah for the generations of the chosen Cohen people to interpret the Torah strictly and only through the kabbalah as taught by rabbis Akiva and Yishmael’s inductive logic reasoning. The Baal new testament makes no mention of logic. Not the four part inductive Oral Torah logic nor the three part deductive philosophy promoted by Plato and Aristotle.
The metaphor of grafting, particularly found in Romans 11, has no Torah precedent. The Talmud mesechta Avoda Zarah and other locations across the Talmud and Midrashim teach that both Esau and Yishmael rejected the Torah. The revelation of the Torah at Sinai therefore reveals a local God rather than some kind of Universal God as the Baal New Testament/Koran preaches.
The sophomoric translation of Isaiah 49:6 states: It is too light a thing that you should be my servant to raise up the tribes of Jacob and to restore the preserved of Israel; I will also give you as a light to the nations, that my salvation may reach to the end of the earth. While these word for word translation of Isaiah 56:6,7 – read totally out of its larger sugyah context states: And the foreigners who join themselves to the Lord, to minister to Him, to love the name of the Lord, and to be His servants… these I will bring to my holy mountain, and make them joyful in my house of prayer; their burnt offerings and their sacrifices will be accepted on my altar; for my house shall be called a house of prayer for all nations.
An utterly idiotic translation because tefillah does not mean prayer! A korban dedicated upon the altar in Zion Jerusalem simply not a barbeque unto Heaven but rather a sworn Torah oath made before a Torah altar. Such Torah oaths require שם ומלכות. The sophomoric translations fails to convey these crucial yet subtle distinctions.
Another corrupt reading of the Hebrew T’NaCH Isaiah 60:3. And nations shall come to your light, and kings to the brightness of your rising. This p’suk makes reference to the 7 branch menorah within the Mishkan. The “light” of this Menorah: the 6 Yom Tov + Shabbat dedications of the Soul Divine Names dedicated on these 7 holy times.
Zechariah 8:22 divorced from its larger context reads Many peoples and strong nations shall come to seek the Lord of hosts in Jerusalem and to entreat the favor of the Lord. Prophet command mussar. To study prophetic mussar requires Oral Torah logic. Specifically in all the examples listed above the כלל פרט kabbalah taught by rabbi Yishmael. The church baal worship rejects the revelation of the Oral Torah inductive reasoning. Paul’s “grafting metaphor” ignores the laws of gere tzeddick. Torah has no faith in any Universal God.
Just as Baal worshipers prioritized wealth and earthly gains, JeZeus warns the rich about the perils of reliance on material wealth. But whereas the Books of the NaCH Prophets prioritizes pursuit of righteous judicial courtroom justice, not so the plagiarized gospel (Protocols of the Elders of Zionism) Roman forgery.
The Gospels plagiarize the T’NaCH. A classic example the 40 day fast of JeZeus in the Sinai desert. Which attempts to duplicate the revelation of the Torah at Sinai and Elijah’s fleeing to the wilderness away from the wrath of the foreign Queen of Israel after the public slaughter of the prophets of Baal.
Such plagiarism seeks to prove that JeZeus “fulfilled” the words of the prophets. Ignorant and oblivious to the simple fact that prophets do not predict the future as does witchcraft but rather commands prophetic mussar applicable – across the board – to all generations of the Chosen Cohen people for all eternity. The gospel counterfeit thus compares to the Czar secret police “Protocols of the Elders of Zionism”.
Such replacement theology defines the Av tumah avoda zarah sin of the Golden Calf wherein the ערב רב assimilated and intermarried Israelites who came out of Egyptian slavery lacked all יראת אלהים, and hence these mixed multitudes who define the eternal war against Amalek Jews named their Golden Calf אלהים similar to which the NT and Koran gave new Names to their theologically created Gods.
This analogy which compares the New Testament to Baal, suggests that the creation of new theological constructs (such as the Christian understanding of God), akin to the Israelites assimilating pagan practices during their time in the wilderness. The cultural assimilation of Jews throughout the generations, and its impact on the perversion religious belief which prioritizes belief in theologically constructed Gods rather than the pursuit of judicial common law justice wherein the courts enforce fair compensation of damages inflicted by one Party upon another Party. Av tuma avoda zarah always prioritizes belief in Gods above the importance of righteous judicial common law courtrooms.
Any shred of intelligence??
Fool life involves more than simply your masturbation in public.
I don’t know – kinda sums it up
Noise grunts.
Parshat Noach explained
Rabbis have preached the equivalent of Jesus’s 2nd coming bull shit — known as ירידות הדורות for no less than 1500 years which culminated in the Shoah. Reactionary nonsense. The Talmud addresses the subject of Noach and the Ark by focusing upon “False Oaths”. The phrase “because of this corruption” directly compares to modern day Joan of Arc, Gretta Thornburg, climate change, Covid-19 – hysteria with her latest condemnation against Israel over the Hamas surprise attack made on Oct7th 2023 on Shemene Atzeret.
G’lut Jewish thoughts concerning social corruption fail to address the Elephant in the China Closet: 1. Jewish assimilation 2. Jewish intermarriage with Goyim. Both negative commandments define the k’vanna of the 2nd Sinai commandment! Kavanah refers to raising positive and negative תולדות מצוות which do not require k’vanna to Av tohor time-oriented commandments which do require k’vanna. Its this distinction of k’vanna which sharply contrasts with Parshat Noach with its curse of false oaths. False oaths caused the Floods of Noach! Remembering the oaths sworn by the Avot, what does remembering the specifics of these Avot oaths accomplish visa-vis g’lut Israel based upon HaShem sending a M’lach ie Moshe to Egypt?
תלדות מצוות קום ועשה ושב ולא תעשה מצוות emphatically do not require k’vanna. Only a bird-brained טיפש פשט makes a literal translation of “time-oriented commandments” strictly limited to time rather than k’vanna. The latter prophetic mussar as expressed through Aggadah scholarship throughout the Talmud. G’lut Jews do not know nor remember the oaths sworn by the Avot whose “time-oriented commandments, which require שם ומלכות, create the chosen Cohen people throughout the generations in compliance with the oath brit HaShem swore in return to the Avot directly binding the oath sworn lands as the eternal inheritance of the Chosen Cohen People.
The term “time-oriented commandments” do not limit understanding to mere chronology, but rather encompass a deeper appreciation the תמיד מעשה בראשית spiritual creation and re-birth of the chosen Cohen people in all generations bnai brit Israel walks before our God. Parshat Noach serves as a permanent reminder that Goyim from the start rejected the oath brit faith. For this reason the Torah employs the term אלהים. Even when the Torah introduces the שם השם, according to Rashi – Goyim employed this Divine Name to call upon their Av tumah avoda zarah Gods.
Goyim theologies and Creeds create Gods. Hence the Torah introduces the Yatzir Ha’Raw within the heart by opening the Torah with בראשית ברא אלהים rather than שם השם בראשית ברא. The holiness of Torah commandments possesses the spiritual sanctity of creating Malachim. Yaacov sent a malach to his brother Esau. HaShem sent a malach unto Par’o in Egypt. The opening blessing of kre’a shma and the repetition of the Shemone Esrei emphasizes the time oriented commandment sanctity of creating malachim through the service of time oriented Av Torah –rather than toldot commandments.
The difference between אלהים vs. שם השם the different spirits which separate the Yatzir HaRaw from the Yatzir Ha’Tov within the oath brit Cohen peoples’ hearts. The 2nd Sinai commandment emphasizes that the Yatzir Ha’Raw worships other Gods. Monotheism as a Av tuma avoda zarah creation of a foreign Universal God for all Humanity, absolutely a abomination against the 2nd Sinai commandment which validates the tumah spirit which drives the Yatzir HaRaw within the heart of Man to worship other Gods.
Observance of stam commandments do not possess the holiness to create from nothing malachim. Only tohor Av time oriented Torah commandments breath this Torah holiness power. Prophets employ malachim especially during times of war. The story of Bil’aam and his attempt to curse Israel, to cause Israel to fall in defeat before our enemy Moav in battle – defines the reason why the Torah refers to the Goy Bil’aam as a prophet.
Par’o, the Gods of Canaan conquered by Jehoshua the prophet, the God of Baal worshipped by the Philistines – these three examples separate the word אלהים from the Divine Presence Spirit Name שם השם. Hence the ערב רב assimilated and intermarried to Egyptians – these corrupt g’lut Israelites – they referred to the Golden Calf by the word אלהים. A fundamental error to assume that the one word interchanges with the Holy Spirit Divine Sinai first commandment Name.
In like manner the distinction between brit and covenant. The latter the Goyim of the Protocols of the Elders of Zionism New Testament and Arab Koran – both av tumah avoda zarah create new Gods JeZeus and Allah – אלהים. Time oriented Av Torah commandments swear a Torah oath through שם ומלאך as messengers of blessing or curse/life or death לשמה.
The Name אלהים when employed through tohor spirits represents the dedicated Chyyah soul –dedicated to HaShem לשמה on Yom Kippur. Divine Names never to be interchanged with the שם השם any more than malachim confused and associated with being equal and part of the שם השם. Doing so defines the direct genesis error of avoda zarah, where Man confused the stars and planets of the Milky War as lessor Gods; and later worshipped them as Gods in their own right.
The Israelite assimilated ערב רב had not developed יראת אלהים. Consequently, just as king Shlomo failed to pursue righteous judicial Sanhedrin courtroom justice during his entire reign as king, and he both copied the customs manners and ways practiced by Goyim who bankrupt the treasury of their respective nations by building, through slave labor, Pyramid Temple Cathedrals as well as marry alien foreign women who reject the revelation of the Torah at Sinai.
Brit vs. Covenant just as far apart as שם השם from אלהים and the creation of malachim through tohor time oriented commandments by prophets of the chosen Cohen people during times of war. The time oriented malachim created through this unique Av type Torah commandment, they serve as ambassadors to plant Torah curses within the Yatzir Ha’Raw of the hearts of the enemies of Israel who come to war against the chosen Cohen people. Like as the לשון הרע of the 10 spies melted the hearts of Israel to conquer the lands of Canaan.
Tohor time oriented Av commandments create malachim יש מאין מדור לדור. G’lut Jewry cursed with the Torah curse that they have lost the wisdom how to do mitzvot לשמה. Hence the Books of Torah commandments like the puke Rambam book of commandments limits Torah commandments to a bird brained טיפש פשט literal reading of the words of the Torah!
Similar to how the Av tuma avoda zarah church makes a literal reading of the Genesis creation story! Both this and that Av tuma avoda zarah totally miss the boat; and worship other Gods as a direct consequence. The Rambam puke worships a Universal Monotheistic God created through Xtian and Arab avoda zarah New Testament and Koran theology – books of tuma. The puke Rambam confuses 7 mitzvot “bnai Noach” as inclusive of all humanity, rather than the temporary residents – Gere Toshav – who resides within the borders of Sanhedrin judicial authority. No Sanhedrin court has a Torah mandate to put a “bnai noach” living in foreign lands to death for violating one of the 7 mitzvot bnai noach as defined in the Aggada of mesechta Sanhedrin!
all religious bollocks.
guilt guilt guilt
Grow up!
Guilty Guilty Guilty go straight to jail. Do not pass Go do not collect $200.
Just as Baal worshipers prioritized wealth and earthly gains, JeZeus warns the rich about the perils of reliance on material wealth. But whereas the Books of the NaCH Prophets prioritizes pursuit of righteous judicial courtroom justice, not so the plagiarized gospel (Protocols of the Elders of Zionism) Roman forgery.
The Gospels plagiarize the T’NaCH. A classic example the 40 day fast of JeZeus in the Sinai desert. Which attempts to duplicate the revelation of the Torah at Sinai and Elijah’s fleeing to the wilderness away from the wrath of the foreign Queen of Israel after the public slaughter of the prophets of Baal.
Such plagiarism seeks to prove that JeZeus “fulfilled” the words of the prophets. Ignorant and oblivious to the simple fact that prophets do not predict the future as does witchcraft but rather commands prophetic mussar applicable – across the board – to all generations of the Chosen Cohen people for all eternity. The gospel counterfeit thus compares to the Czar secret police “Protocols of the Elders of Zionism”.
Such replacement theology defines the Av tumah avoda zarah sin of the Golden Calf wherein the ערב רב assimilated and intermarried Israelites who came out of Egyptian slavery lacked all יראת אלהים, and hence these mixed multitudes who define the eternal war against Amalek Jews named their Golden Calf אלהים similar to which the NT and Koran gave new Names to their theologically created Gods.
This analogy which compares the New Testament to Baal, suggests that the creation of new theological constructs (such as the Christian understanding of God), akin to the Israelites assimilating pagan practices during their time in the wilderness. The cultural assimilation of Jews throughout the generations, and its impact on the perversion religious belief which prioritizes belief in theologically constructed Gods rather than the pursuit of judicial common law justice wherein the courts enforce fair compensation of damages inflicted by one Party upon another Party. Av tuma avoda zarah always prioritizes belief in Gods above the importance of righteous judicial common law courtrooms.
Try using brain instead of repeating same shit.
Noise from a moron. The Bible as literature has had a tremendous impact upon human civilizations. Idiot.
Israel’s recent diplomatic posture reflects a sharp pivot away from traditional UN frameworks — particularly Resolutions 242 and 338 — and toward the Abraham Accords as its preferred basis for regional peace.
Rejection of UN Resolutions 242 & 338: These resolutions have long underpinned the two-state solution framework, supported by the UN, EU, and Arab League. The directly violate direct negotiations between Israel and Arab states in favor of revisionist history which declares that Israel remains a UN Protectorate territory ruled by international committee ie UN Resolutions.
The Abraham Accords represent a complete break from land-for-peace diplomacy. Israeli diplomacy prioritizes that Arab countries must fundamentally validate the objective of Zionism: Jewish equal rights to achieve self-determination as the 1922 League of Nations Palestine Mandate and the 1948 UN Resolution 181, including the 2/3rds majority of Member states UN Resolution permanently rejects any further UN attempt to impose diplomatic solutions through UN Committee Proxy. Israeli Independence fundamentally rejects any UN diplomatic role in determination of Israeli strategic and tactical diplomatic decisions.
The Abraham Accords, signed in 2020 with UAE, Bahrain, Morocco, and Sudan: focus on economic, security, and diplomatic normalization without requiring territorial concessions. Clear proof that shalom – quite possible without UN mediation or Palestinian dhimmy Arab non State preconditions. Arabs lost the 1948 and 1967 Wars. Full Stop. No revisionist history of these cold hard facts permitted. UN Resolutions 242, 338 etc represent UN Revisionist history which pretends that Israel lost these two wars to the Arab hostile rejection of Zionism, as expressed in UN Resolution 3379: Zionism is Racism.
Israel has increasingly criticized European states — especially London and Paris — for treating it as if it were still under UN mandate status, implying a lack of sovereignty. Furthermore, the long term objective of the Abraham Peace Accords: that a majority of Arab countries across the Middle East and North Africa recognize Israel with the Primary objective of forcing the UN itself to publicly recognize Israel as a country within the Middle East community of Nations. Israel rejects the UN Apartheid policy which excludes Israel as a member State of the Middle East voting block of nations within the UN itself.
UN Resolutions which calls for recognitin of Palestinian statehood furthermore violates the Oslo Accords. Israel a fully sovereign nation, not subject to UN trusteeship. European pressure, specifically addressed through EU participation in UN SC & GA Resolution “committee votes”, Israel interprets as “Colonial-style interference.
Post the Oct 7th 2023 Abomination War, Game Over Israeli response to the recent UN GA vote supported by former West European or Nato allied states which demanded that Israel terminate its “unlawful presence” in Palestinian territories ignores the PLO 1964 Charter which did not refer to “occupied territories” as inclusive of either the Jordanian West Bank or the Egyptian Gaza. Therefore UN 242 & 338 rewrites and ignores the PLO charter of Yasser Arafat’s PLO while it recognizes the Oslo PA as an Indepedent Palestinian State!
Israeli diplomatic doctrine openly rejects the legacy of UN-imposed frameworks and repositions the Abraham Accords as the legitimate foundation for shalom. Shalom, unlike the noun Peace, a verb which requires trust. Peace as a noun only promotes the slight of hand propaganda rhetoric and nothing of real substance.
UN Resolutions 242 & 338, historically central to the two-state solution, viewed by Israel as tools of revisionist diplomacy that undermine its sovereignty. They falsely imply Israel lost the 1948 and 1967 wars and remain under international trusteeship — a notion Israel categorically rejects.
Israel interprets these resolutions as relics of a UN system that seeks to impose outcomes via committee votes rather than direct negotiation. As such, they maintain UN Apartheid policies which adamentaly refuse to validate Zionism established through the League of Nations 1922 Palestine Mandate, based upon the Balfour Declaration signed between Israel and Britain. Since the British defeat in the 1956 War, Britain lost its status as a Great Power. Both Britain and France should not sit on the UN Secority Council as permanent members with veto powers. France lost WWII.
Israel requires direct face to face negotiations with any and all Arab Countries, based upon the latter’s recognition of political Zionism: Jewish equal rights to achieve self-determination in the Middle East and North Africa.
Arab states must recognize Jewish self-determination as rooted in the 1922 League of Nations Mandate and UN Resolution 181 (1947).
Full regional integration of Israel into the Middle East diplomatic bloc, forcing UN recognition of Israel as a legitimate regional actor.
All UN Resolutions demanding Israel withdraw from “unlawful presence” in Palestinian territories are seen as illegitimate. Israel’s “Game Over” response signals a final break with European and UN diplomatic frameworks.
London, Paris, and EU allies are accused of treating Israel as a UN mandate territory, perpetuating colonial-style interference. UN recognition of Palestinian statehood bypasses the Oslo framework, which requires bilateral negotiation.
PLO Charter (1964): Did not claim West Bank or Gaza — undermining the historical basis for current UN territorial claims. UN Resolution 3379: “Zionism is Racism” (revoked in 1991) remains a symbolic grievance in Israeli diplomatic memory. Game Over – Israel demands that Britain and France lose their Great Power status in the UN Security Council. British/EU imperialism\colonialism Israel categorically rejects. France lost WWII and both countries lost the 1956 Suez War. Solid proof that neither country qualifies as a great power. Furthermore Israel as a nuclear power, based upon UN hostility to the existence of political Zionism and the Jewish state, requires permanent member status on the Security Council inclusive of veto powers.
The UN doesn’t support GENOCIDE!!
Oink Oink
Just as Baal worshipers prioritized wealth and earthly gains, JeZeus warns the rich about the perils of reliance on material wealth. But whereas the Books of the NaCH Prophets prioritizes pursuit of righteous judicial courtroom justice, not so the plagiarized gospel (Protocols of the Elders of Zionism) Roman forgery.
The Gospels plagiarize the T’NaCH. A classic example the 40 day fast of JeZeus in the Sinai desert. Which attempts to duplicate the revelation of the Torah at Sinai and Elijah’s fleeing to the wilderness away from the wrath of the foreign Queen of Israel after the public slaughter of the prophets of Baal.
Such plagiarism seeks to prove that JeZeus “fulfilled” the words of the prophets. Ignorant and oblivious to the simple fact that prophets do not predict the future as does witchcraft but rather commands prophetic mussar applicable – across the board – to all generations of the Chosen Cohen people for all eternity. The gospel counterfeit thus compares to the Czar secret police “Protocols of the Elders of Zionism”.
Such replacement theology defines the Av tumah avoda zarah sin of the Golden Calf wherein the ערב רב assimilated and intermarried Israelites who came out of Egyptian slavery lacked all יראת אלהים, and hence these mixed multitudes who define the eternal war against Amalek Jews named their Golden Calf אלהים similar to which the NT and Koran gave new Names to their theologically created Gods.
This analogy which compares the New Testament to Baal, suggests that the creation of new theological constructs (such as the Christian understanding of God), akin to the Israelites assimilating pagan practices during their time in the wilderness. The cultural assimilation of Jews throughout the generations, and its impact on the perversion religious belief which prioritizes belief in theologically constructed Gods rather than the pursuit of judicial common law justice wherein the courts enforce fair compensation of damages inflicted by one Party upon another Party. Av tuma avoda zarah always prioritizes belief in Gods above the importance of righteous judicial common law courtrooms.
The UN doesn’t support GENOCIDE?? African history testifies differently.
More bollocks!!
More farts
The Introduction of Prophetic mussar rather than Higher Criticism history speculations
This 2nd Parsha of the Book of בראשית, Parshat Noach. The opening two Parshaot serve as an introduction of the Torah which formally begins with the 3rd Parsha – the introduction of Avraham the father of the chosen Cohen people. What do the opening first two Parshaot of בראשית introduce? This fundamentally basic question – it defines these two Parshaot.
Notice that the Torah introduces the Name אלהים rather than the שם השם לשמה. Herein serves as an introduction to the 7th Oral Torah middah רב חסד, which the Talmud interprets to mean as מאי נפקא מינא? The 7th Oral Torah attribute spirit distinguishes – something like as does the קידוש\הבדלה of shabbat the distinction between Av tohor time-oriented commandments from positive commandments. A fundamental מאי נפקא מינא wherein the Talmud discerns that the former Av Torah commandments require “k’vanna (an as yet undefined term which fundamentally requires definition) whereas the latter Torah mitzvot do not require k’vanna/כוונה.
The aggadic mussar story of the Book of בראשית, not at all challenged by the late 19th Century German Higher Criticism. The catastrophic events of the World Wars prompted a reevaluation of Enlightenment ideals, including the objectivity and rationality that underpinned Higher Critical methods. Scholars began to question the biases inherent in historical analysis. Post Shoah no more get out of jail free for Xtianity, with its Nazi rat-lines to prevent the execution of justice upon Nazi war criminals.
Fear of Heaven shapes the reputation of both Man in general and religious institutions in particular. The alliance between Lutheranism and Nazism during the Nazi regime in Germany presents a complex and troubling history which ultimately undermined late 19th Century German Higher Criticism. That both Catholic and Protestant Xtianity aided and assisted the Nazis. Pope Pius XII failed to even protest the Nazi slaughter of Rome’s Jews! Actions speak louder than priests or pastors screaming “Fear God”. The Nazi systematic slaughter of 75% of Western European Jewry while the Xtian church ignored oppression, theft, injustice and genocide permanently destroyed the good name of Xtianity.
Had the church condemned FDR’s decision to embrace Chamberlain’s White Paper and bar European refugees entrance to America perhaps the charge that the Xtian church lacks Fear of Heaven, would not stick to all eternity thereafter. Fear of Heaven, means protecting the Good Name reputation – just that simple. Post Shoah, Hitler and his Nazi SS mafia permanently destroyed the Good Name reputation of all branches of Xtianity; starting with German Protestant ‘Higher Criticism. Higher Criticism, which began to deconstruct traditional interpretations tied to authoritarian and nationalistic ideologies.
Perhaps the Talmud did not clarify crystal clear when Goyim abandoned all together the Brit faith and ipso facto worshipped other Gods. The בראשית aggadic mussar story therefore opens with אלהים כלל rather than the שם השם לשמה פרט. Why did HaShem accept the korban of young Hev’el and reject the Cohen First-born son Cain’s korban? The Torah revelation validate both types of korbanot! The Torah contains the רמז word ברית אש\בראשית. Just as the dispute between the two sons of Adam equally reflected in the רמז word ב’ ראשית. Rabbi Yechuda Ha’Nasi interprets the language of kre’a shma בכל לבבך\כם based upon the Torah precedent: ב’ ראשית, two opposing Yatzirot struggle within the heart like as did Esau and Yaacov wrestled within the womb of Rivka.
Therefore, when exactly did the Goyim reject the ברית אש\בראשית? Concerning the two korbanot dedicated by the two opposing sons of Adam, Hevel’s korban accepted because his k’vanna dedicated the korban through the Torah oath (שם ומלכות) in the Name of the Creation oath brit. Cain’s korban rejected because his korban lacked k’vanna. Hence the distinction between Av tohor time-oriented commandments which require k’vanna from positive תולדות commandments which do not require k’vanna. Do the תולדות follow the Avot? This defining מאי נפקא מינא detail both mesechtot Shabbat and Baba Kama ask – this very question! Clearly the distinction in the case of the two opposing “Yatzirot” of Adam: Doing mitzvot stam does not follow doing mitzvot with the k’vanna of “oath brit”.
ולשת גם הוא ילד בן ויקרא את שמו אנוש אז הוחל לקרא בשם השם.
Following the murder of Hevel, Chava the wife of Adam gave birth to a third son. This third son, who did he follow? The masoret of murdered Hevel or the masoret of Cain? Touching Enosh, the Tanna Targum Onkelos writes: בכן ביומוהי חלו בני אנשא מלצלאה בשמא דהשם. Rashi, an early major Reshon, interprets – אז הוחל. לשון חולין, לקרת את שמות האדם ואת שמות העצבים בשמו של הקדוש ברוך רבים. הוא, לעשותן אלילים ולקרותן אלהות
Recall that the HaShem permitted Adam to call the created animals names in the last p’suk prior to the third aliya to the Torah. But the first born cohen son of שת, the son born after Cain murder Hevel. The Targum employs the verb מלצלאה בשמא דהשם. They prayed to HaShem. Whereas the Rashi explanation the 2nd generation אנוש, comparable to Chava’s: ותאמר האשה אל הנחש מפרי עץ הגן נאכל ומפרי העץ אשר בתוך הגן אמר אלהים לא תאכלו ממנו ולא תגעו בן פן תמתון. Chava added on to the original commandment as did the 2nd generation of Adam, Enosh, who started naming the stars with Divine Names. Just as the snake deceived Chava so to later down stream generations did a ירידות הדורות domino effect and stared worshipping other אלהים. This action of avoda zarah created Man created Gods in the image of Man.
Mesechta Sanhedrin asks the famous question: What caused the Flood disaster in the days of Noach? Answer ברית אש, the fire of the brit sworn oaths (שם ומלכות); the generation of Noach made false oaths! A Torah oath has the power to create through tohor time-oriented Av Torah commandments מלאכים; a Torah oath fundamentally requires שם ומלכות. But only Av tumah avoda zarah assumes that man can create Gods by means of swearing a Torah oath. This tumah yatzir/Yatzir Ha’Raw within the heart literally reads בראשית ברא אלהים. Attempts to create Gods יש מאין profanes ברית אש\בראשית. Herein the מאי נפקא מינא which distinguishes tohor middot from tumah middot; the Divine service of the chosen Cohen people forever separates Shabbat from Chol, זמן גרמא מצוות מן תולדות מצוות.
Its the discernment of fine distinctions which separates like from like which defines the concept of “understanding”. Upon this יסוד breathes the Divine Spirit רב חסד. This middah discerns time-oriented commandments which require k’vanna from תולדות commandments which do not require k’vanna. HaShem accepted the korban of 2nd born Hevel because he dedicated the korban לשם ברית. HaShem rejected the korban of Adam’s first born son Cain, because he dedicated his korban – as a reactionary barbeque unto Heaven. A fundamental מאי נפקא מינא.
Modern Judaism with the rise of the Jewish modern state/national Independence.
Shalom a verb that stands upon the foundation of trust. Peace simply a noun name/label. The tohor time oriented commandment of Shabbat serves as the basis of the Torah vision of time oriented Av commandments. The Order of the 5 Books of the Torah – בראשית – Introduces not only “literally” the Avot: Avraham, Yitzak, and Yaacov but this יסוד Book of the Torah introduces Av tohor time-oriented commandments. The Creation story introduces the concept of time: day one day two etc. The opening word בראשית יש ברית אש, ראש בית, ב’ ראשית – these words within words of בראשית known as a רמז.
The rabbis inherited the Oral Torah masoret/tradition from the P’rushim which the Romans referred to by the Greek name Pharisees, as expressed in the Protocols of the Elders of Zionism New Testament Roman forgery. Prior to the Jewish revolt which culminated in the destruction of Herod’s Temple abomination, Judean society fractured into polarized sects. Rabbis Akiva and Yishmael taught the Oral Torah kabbalah handed down from the P’rushim known as פרדס logic.
A four-part inductive reasoning dynamic logic. The ancient Greek philosophers by contrast developed a far simpler static three-part deductive logic known as syllogism. Inductive reasoning vs. deductive reasoning — the difference between calculus dynamic variables vs. rigid algebra. The lights of Chanukkah remembers a Civil War wherein the P’rushim sought to not forget the Oral Torah whereas the Tzeddukim/Sadducees in Greek\favored turning Jerusalem into a Greek style polis/city state; and replacing simplified Greek deductive logic over Oral Torah inductive logic.
The next three Books of the Torah שמות, ויקרא, במדבר introduces תולדות precedent commandments; which do not require prophetic mussar as their כוונה as opposed to the time-oriented mitzvot introduced in the Book of בראשית these mitzvot absolutely require prophetic mussar as their דבר שבלב כוונה. Herein split the Rambam’s Sefer Ha’Mitzvot vs. the B’HaG’s Book of commandments. Rambam organized the Torah commandments based upon a literal limitation of commandments located within the Torah. The B’HaG by contrast views all halachot within the Talmud as possible to elevate these rabbinic commandments to Torah time-oriented commandments through prophetic mussar.
The B’HaG learned the Talmud, as well as the T’NaCH as a common law legal system. The latter makes by means of בניני אבות\precedents learns prophetic mussar. The Talmud divided into two opposing threads similar to that of a loom. Aggadah vs Halacha. The Aggadah makes a drosh back to learn T’NaCH prophetic mussar based upon interpreting the language of a passage of T’NaCH by comparing it to a similar prophetic mussar precedent – something like the two sights of a rifle permits a person to shoot with accuracy down range.
Torah in context of the modern world: Can Jews reestablish the Written Torah as the Constitution of our 12 Tribes Republic. This Constitution gives a mandate to lateral Sanhedrin common law courtroom to define Torah faith through צדק צדק תרדוף – Justice Justice pursue. This vision of faith radically different from Baal to JeZeus to Allah avoda zarah wherein Man names the Names of Gods like Adam named the names of animals. When the Jews came out of the g’lut of Babylonian exile, they took as their “baggage” proper names given to Angels. During the Davidic kingdom 1st Commonwealth Republic the NaCH does not refer to Angels by direct names. Goyim Avoda Zarah takes this to its logical conclusion. Its theologies names Gods; the Nicene Creed created the Trinity and the theology of the Koran created a strict Monotheism. The latter directly violates and profanes the 2nd Sinai Commandment: Do not worship other Gods.
Based upon the response of my last article, the volume and diversity of reactions caused me to re-write a second part to the original document.
This 2nd Parsha of the Book of בראשית, Parshat Noach. The opening two Parshaot serve as an introduction of the Torah which formally begins with the 3rd Parsha – the introduction of Avraham the father of the chosen Cohen people. What do the opening first two Parshaot of בראשית introduce? This fundamentally basic question – it defines these two Parshaot.
Notice that the Torah introduces the Name אלהים rather than the שם השם לשמה. Herein serves as an introduction to the 7th Oral Torah middah רב חסד, which the Talmud interprets to mean as מאי נפקא מינא? The 7th Oral Torah attribute spirit distinguishes – something like as does the קידוש\הבדלה of shabbat the distinction between Av tohor time-oriented commandments from positive commandments. A fundamental מאי נפקא מינא wherein the Talmud discerns that the former Av Torah commandments require “k’vanna (an as yet undefined term which fundamentally requires definition) whereas the latter Torah mitzvot do not require k’vanna/כוונה.
The aggadic mussar story of the Book of בראשית, not at all challenged by the late 19th Century German Higher Criticism. The catastrophic events of the World Wars prompted a reevaluation of Enlightenment ideals, including the objectivity and rationality that underpinned Higher Critical methods. Scholars began to question the biases inherent in historical analysis. Post Shoah no more get out of jail free for Xtianity, with its Nazi rat-lines to prevent the execution of justice upon Nazi war criminals.
Fear of Heaven shapes the reputation of both Man in general and religious institutions in particular. The alliance between Lutheranism and Nazism during the Nazi regime in Germany presents a complex and troubling history which ultimately undermined late 19th Century German Higher Criticism. That both Catholic and Protestant Xtianity aided and assisted the Nazis. Pope Pius XII failed to even protest the Nazi slaughter of Rome’s Jews! Actions speak louder than priests or pastors screaming “Fear God”. The Nazi systematic slaughter of 75% of Western European Jewry while the Xtian church ignored oppression, theft, injustice and genocide permanently destroyed the good name of Xtianity.
Had the church condemned FDR’s decision to embrace Chamberlain’s White Paper and bar European refugees entrance to America perhaps the charge that the Xtian church lacks Fear of Heaven, would not stick to all eternity thereafter. Fear of Heaven, means protecting the Good Name reputation – just that simple. Post Shoah, Hitler and his Nazi SS mafia permanently destroyed the Good Name reputation of all branches of Xtianity; starting with German Protestant ‘Higher Criticism. Higher Criticism, which began to deconstruct traditional interpretations tied to authoritarian and nationalistic ideologies.
Perhaps the Talmud did not clarify crystal clear when Goyim abandoned all together the Brit faith and ipso facto worshipped other Gods. The בראשית aggadic mussar story therefore opens with אלהים כלל rather than the שם השם לשמה פרט. Why did HaShem accept the korban of young Hev’el and reject the Cohen First-born son Cain’s korban? The Torah revelation validate both types of korbanot! The Torah contains the רמז word ברית אש\בראשית. Just as the dispute between the two sons of Adam equally reflected in the רמז word ב’ ראשית. Rabbi Yechuda Ha’Nasi interprets the language of kre’a shma בכל לבבך\כם based upon the Torah precedent: ב’ ראשית, two opposing Yatzirot struggle within the heart like as did Esau and Yaacov wrestled within the womb of Rivka.
Therefore, when exactly did the Goyim reject the ברית אש\בראשית? Concerning the two korbanot dedicated by the two opposing sons of Adam, Hevel’s korban accepted because his k’vanna dedicated the korban through the Torah oath (שם ומלכות) in the Name of the Creation oath brit. Cain’s korban rejected because his korban lacked k’vanna. Hence the distinction between Av tohor time-oriented commandments which require k’vanna from positive תולדות commandments which do not require k’vanna. Do the תולדות follow the Avot? This defining מאי נפקא מינא detail both mesechtot Shabbat and Baba Kama ask – this very question! Clearly the distinction in the case of the two opposing “Yatzirot” of Adam: Doing mitzvot stam does not follow doing mitzvot with the k’vanna of “oath brit”.
ולשת גם הוא ילד בן ויקרא את שמו אנוש אז הוחל לקרא בשם השם.
Following the murder of Hevel, Chava the wife of Adam gave birth to a third son. This third son, who did he follow? The masoret of murdered Hevel or the masoret of Cain? Touching Enosh, the Tanna Targum Onkelos writes: בכן ביומוהי חלו בני אנשא מלצלאה בשמא דהשם. Rashi, an early major Reshon, interprets – אז הוחל. לשון חולין, לקרת את שמות האדם ואת שמות העצבים בשמו של הקדוש ברוך רבים. הוא, לעשותן אלילים ולקרותן אלהות
Recall that the HaShem permitted Adam to call the created animals names in the last p’suk prior to the third aliya to the Torah. But the first born cohen son of שת, the son born after Cain murder Hevel. The Targum employs the verb מלצלאה בשמא דהשם. They prayed to HaShem. Whereas the Rashi explanation the 2nd generation אנוש, comparable to Chava’s: ותאמר האשה אל הנחש מפרי עץ הגן נאכל ומפרי העץ אשר בתוך הגן אמר אלהים לא תאכלו ממנו ולא תגעו בן פן תמתון. Chava added on to the original commandment as did the 2nd generation of Adam, Enosh, who started naming the stars with Divine Names. Just as the snake deceived Chava so to later down stream generations did a ירידות הדורות domino effect and stared worshipping other אלהים. This action of avoda zarah created Man created Gods in the image of Man.
Mesechta Sanhedrin asks the famous question: What caused the Flood disaster in the days of Noach? Answer ברית אש, the fire of the brit sworn oaths (שם ומלכות); the generation of Noach made false oaths! A Torah oath has the power to create through tohor time-oriented Av Torah commandments מלאכים; a Torah oath fundamentally requires שם ומלכות. But only Av tumah avoda zarah assumes that man can create Gods by means of swearing a Torah oath. This tumah yatzir/Yatzir Ha’Raw within the heart literally reads בראשית ברא אלהים. Attempts to create Gods יש מאין profanes ברית אש\בראשית. Herein the מאי נפקא מינא which distinguishes tohor middot from tumah middot; the Divine service of the chosen Cohen people forever separates Shabbat from Chol, זמן גרמא מצוות מן תולדות מצוות.
Its the discernment of fine distinctions which separates like from like which defines the concept of “understanding”. Upon this יסוד breathes the Divine Spirit רב חסד. This middah discerns time-oriented commandments which require k’vanna from תולדות commandments which do not require k’vanna. HaShem accepted the korban of 2nd born Hevel because he dedicated the korban לשם ברית. HaShem rejected the korban of Adam’s first born son Cain, because he dedicated his korban – as a reactionary barbeque unto Heaven. A fundamental מאי נפקא מינא.
The concepts discussed this text concerning Prophetic Mussar vs. Higher Criticism – likened to strategic elements in American football, where the interplay of different philosophies and techniques shapes the game’s outcomes. The interpretation of religious texts, particularly the T’NaCH and Talmud, through the lens of Protestant Higher Criticism highlights a significant divide similar to competing teams in sports. This comparison illustrates how differing interpretations can create rival perspectives akin to the dynamics observed in competitive sports.
The ethical conflicts discussed, like the rejection of Cain’s offering, resemble the moral decisions players and coaches face during the game. Decisions made in split seconds can have far-reaching implications, just as ethical considerations shape spiritual narratives. The tensions between different interpretations of faith parallel heated rivalries in American football, where teams vie for dominance based on different strategies—some focusing on offense (like allowing emotional decisions to guide Korban choices), while others emphasize defense (like the analytical approach of Higher Criticism, showing how such a path leads to a 4th down punt or worse a fumble or interception.)
Protestant Higher Criticism perceives the T’NaCH as a historical document rather than instruction which teaches mussar as it applies to the generations. The former compare to placing an idol upon a plinth pedestal and worshipping this superior theologically created being – as a God. Both Xtianity and Islam do exactly this with their treatment and behavior toward Jesus and Muhammad. Recall when western magazines mocked Muhammad and Muslims physically attacked both institutions and persons. Salman Rushdie’s “The Satanic Verses” declared blasphemous by many in the Muslim community which resulted in Rushdie hiding for his life. The Salem witch trials, between February 1692 and May 1693. The Puritans, held strong beliefs in the supernatural. They viewed the world as a battleground between God and the Devil, leading to fears of witches as instruments of evil.
Both this and that absolutely insist that Jesus and Muhammad lived as historical persons. Protestant Higher Criticism denounced the Hebrew T’NaCH as a fraud. They declared that multiple authors actually wrote the Torah and say the book of Isaiah over the span of centuries. This idea that “scholarship” must interpret T’NaCH literature as physical and historical rather than as mussar rebukes equally applicable to all persons in all generations separates Traditional Judaism from Conservative and Reform Judaism which likewise views the T’NaCH as primarily historical documents.
Hence how a person interprets the T’NaCH and Talmud pits two or more sets of opposing teams. The same equally applies scholarly disputes within the Talmud itself. Publication of the Rambam’s Yad Hazakah exploded into a Jewish Civil War whose impact destroyed generations of Jews even after Napoleon freed Western European Jews from the Catholic ghetto gulags of three Centuries. The Rambam Civil War pits judicial Talmudic common law against assimilated Greek/Roman statute laws. Four part פרדס inductive logic against three part Syllogism deductive logic. Just as sports teams build their programs around acquiring the best talented players, so to T’NaCH and Talmudic scholarship disputed and fought over down through the millennium.
The violent reactions to perceived blasphemy, such as attacks following disrespect towards religious figures (Muhammad, Jesus), parallel heated rivalries in sports, where fans quite often react vehemently against perceived slights to their teams or athletes in both American and European football. Competing interpretations of sacred texts create a dialogue similar to rival teams focusing on their strengths and weaknesses. The debate over Talmudic interpretation—judicial common law vs. foreign legislative statute law—resembles the endless strategizing that teams engage in to outmaneuver their opponents.
The tension between interpretations of the T’NaCH and Talmud can be likened to rivalry in sports, where competing teams navigate through a complex landscape of strategies, beliefs, and interpretations. Just as sports teams flourish through their scholar-like understanding of gameplay and competition, religious communities develop their unique culture, customs, identities and philosophies around the interpretation of sacred texts—creating a dynamic and ongoing dialogue, in fact – quite similar to violent conflict between the fans in the world of sports. A rich tapestry of beliefs and practices that, while distinct, often results in far wider fan clashes inside and outside both arenas and society. Violence influences wider cultural and social dynamics across American and European societies which inherit hatred which equals the Sunni Shiite rivalry which divides Arab and Muslim civilizations.
The Eagle and the Scimitar
The “League of the Crescent” seeks to destroy an emergent “Mountain Republic”. The “Republic of the Covenant” intervenes to prevent ethnic annihilation and redraws the map of the region. The League of the Crescent crosses the border into the Mountain Republic, based upon the assumption that within a few days to a couple of weeks that it could conquer these hapless people. It invasion Armies deploys a million-man Army which includes drones, armour, and naval blockades etc. Something like the Russian opening invasion of the Ukraine.
The dictator of the “League of the Crescent”, a vain man who surrounds himself with compliant and fearful Yes-men boot lickers. These flatterers, similar to false prophets predict a glorious short war. They justify the invasion as but merely a “security operation”, aimed to crush Kurdish-style arrogant pretensions to achieve National Independence. The League of the Crescent, in this sense resembles Main Land Communist China vs. the Island of Tiawan.
The Supreme Leader assured that this short war people shall remember something like the June 1967 Six Day War or the Israeli 12 Day War against Iran. The Great Leader of the League of the Crescent guaranteed that the Republic of the Covenant would not intervene in the incursion due to the swiftness of this short, “tiny war”. Alas the Great Leader failed to account for the secret Intelligence services of the Republic of the Covenant, know as the Poosang.
The Great Leader of the League of the Crescent, pampered within his palace of marble and mirrors. He perceived himself as a genius, greater than Saddam Hussein! He rejoiced and celebrated the expected ‘Good News’ of the total surrender of the Mountain Republic. His News Outlets of propaganda declared sweeping military victories and advances deep into the heart of the Mountain Republic. Alas due to the horrors of war his spy satellites had mysteriously gone blind. The forward tip of the spear battalions had gone mute – due to the rules of military silence.
This quiet on the “All Western Front”, concealed the operations of the Poosang which engaged the forces of the League of the Crescent before their grand alliance tanks even crossed the Mountain Republic borders. The Great Leader cursed those damned mountains for the black-out and radio silence.
For years the Poosang spies had slept inside the veins and arteries pumped blood in the heart of the League of the Cresent. With their ears on the rail-lines the Poosang instituted “Echo Protocols” which effectively controlled the hardware which guided all his drones and military computers. Every encrypted field device, every general’s wrist comm, every staff officer’s tablet the Poosang had broken all the secret codes, comparable to the Nazi Enigma code machine.
Across twenty-six command centers, simultaneous detonations silenced the League’s General Staff. The admirals aboard the flagship Hawk of the Faithful vanished into a white flash that rose like dawn over the sea. In airbases, pilots never reached their cockpits; in bunkers, the emergency systems themselves turned executioner. The Poosang called it Operation Mirrorfall. No bullet fired, no soldier seen — only the reflection of arrogance devoured by its own circuitry.
In the Palace, the Great Leader’s personal console — a custom device made by his most trusted engineers — suddenly displayed a message written in flawless Crescent script: “The Covenant remembers the mountains. The Covenant watches.” Before his guards could react, a faint pulse passed through the room — like the sigh of a thousand invisible wings. The mirrors around him cracked. The throne of the Crescent fell silent.
By dawn, the League’s capital had lost its voice. No orders, no command. Only confusion — and the hum of unseen drones hovering high above the city’s minarets, marking targets with the light of judgment. The war that was to last two weeks ended in two days. The balance of Power in this critical region of the world had permanently shifted – like that of a powerful Earthquake.
The Republic of the Covenant, like both the 6 Day and 12 Day Wars achieves total Air Dominance over the Skies of an earlier decapitated dictator. Its famous MacBauch tanks sweep across those lands and chaos and anarchy which prevailed following that dictator’s escape to the land of furry Vadka drinking boors. That dictator consoled his exile unto his new homeland with his dream to live in the ideal socialist republic of absolute dictatorship.
Before the International World Government could impose or intervene the Army of the Republic of the Covenant had for the third time conquered “New Rome” glorified under Emperor Caracalla of 3rd Century Roman empire days long dead, now given the ritual Tahnik Shahadah Aqiqah Ghusl Name of Kurdistan. The Kurds rejoiced having finally attained their National Independence as a free Nation by burning the Megale Ekklesia to the ground and throwing its stones into the Sea as cursed hated objects wherein barbarian idolaters worshipped their theologically created Gods.
Later, following a day of absolute rejoicing came the hard work of making Kurdistan a viable and stable nation state. The victors of total war forced a two-state solution similar to what the WWII Allies did upon divided Germany and Berlin. The League of the Crescent populations forced out of the lands of the Mountain Republic. Both nations made a mass population transfer and exchange, akin to what India and Pakistan or the German native populations forcibly expelled from Prussia Poland and Russia.
The skies over the Crescent were clear — not by weather, but by conquest.
The Republic of the Covenant’s air fleet, unmatched since the wars of old, swept through the heavens like the six-winged seraphim of Isaiah’s vision. The League’s remaining aircraft never rose; their hangars became molten graves beneath precision light.
Below, the MacBauch divisions advanced — steel leviathans guided by silent operators who read the war like scripture. The dictator, once master of the League of the Crescent, fled eastward to the land of vodka-drinking dreamers, seeking refuge among those who called tyranny an “ideal republic.” In his exile, he still rehearsed speeches to ghosts — declaring himself leader of a nation that no longer existed.
By the time the International World Government convened its emergency session, the war — already history — Consummatum est. The ancient imperial city once rebuilt and renamed a dozen times by a dozen conquerors. But this time the conquest was final. The city was given a new covenantal name: Kurdistan, the “Mountain Republic fulfilled.”
Its citizens poured into the streets, not as subjects but as free men and women. They toppled the old monuments of theology and empire. The Great Church of Megale Ekklesia, symbol of centuries of domination, was dismantled stone by stone, its marble cast into the sea — a ritual cleansing of idolatry and empire alike.
The Republic of the Covenant, aware that chaos follows liberation, imposed order with an iron patience. A new border was drawn, not with feather pen of a Pie in the Sky “International Law” world government but through borders established as spoils of war. For the first time in a thousand years, the Mountains spoke their own tongue again. And though the world condemned the Covenant’s methods, it also watched in awe — for no one could deny that, once again, history had bowed to the will of the Republic of the Covenant.
Along the highways, caravans moved in opposite directions. The Crescent settlers departed with the dust of their cities on their feet, escorted by soldiers of the Covenant who offered neither cruelty nor comfort. From the northern valleys, displaced tribes returned singing old songs that had not been heard for centuries. The twin columns passed each other without words, like tides obeying the pull of a hidden moon. In the marketplaces of Kurdistan, new alphabets appeared on the signs. Children recited them as though discovering light.
At night, the elders gathered around fires on rooftops and told stories the League had forbidden, naming villages by their true, ancient names. The stars above the mountains seemed sharper, as though the sky had waited for this speech to return. Yet beneath the songs and rebuilding there lingered a hush — the silence of people learning to trust freedom after generations of command. Every dawn carried the scent of both promise and remembrance. The mountains had their voice again, but the world still listened, wondering whether that voice would become a song or a storm.
The Tribunal of Nations convenes hearings accusing the Covenant of “war crimes” and “population transfer.” The Covenant’s ambassadors must defend their actions before a hypocritical world body that by rote mantra again and again ignores the Shoah – the basis for the formation of this unworthy “Tribunal of Nations”.
Israel’s recent diplomatic posture reflects a sharp pivot away from traditional UN frameworks — particularly Resolutions 242 and 338 — and toward the Abraham Accords as its preferred basis for regional peace.
Rejection of UN Resolutions 242 & 338: These resolutions have long underpinned the two-state solution framework, supported by the UN, EU, and Arab League. The directly violate direct negotiations between Israel and Arab states in favor of revisionist history which declares that Israel remains a UN Protectorate territory ruled by international committee ie UN Resolutions.
The Abraham Accords represent a complete break from land-for-peace diplomacy. Israeli diplomacy prioritizes that Arab countries must fundamentally validate the objective of Zionism: Jewish equal rights to achieve self-determination as the 1922 League of Nations Palestine Mandate and the 1948 UN Resolution 181, including the 2/3rds majority of Member states UN Resolution permanently rejects any further UN attempt to impose diplomatic solutions through UN Committee Proxy. Israeli Independence fundamentally rejects any UN diplomatic role in determination of Israeli strategic and tactical diplomatic decisions.
The Abraham Accords, signed in 2020 with UAE, Bahrain, Morocco, and Sudan: focus on economic, security, and diplomatic normalization without requiring territorial concessions. Clear proof that shalom – quite possible without UN mediation or Palestinian dhimmy Arab non State preconditions. Arabs lost the 1948 and 1967 Wars. Full Stop. No revisionist history of these cold hard facts permitted. UN Resolutions 242, 338 etc represent UN Revisionist history which pretends that Israel lost these two wars to the Arab hostile rejection of Zionism, as expressed in UN Resolution 3379: Zionism is Racism.
Israel has increasingly criticized European states — especially London and Paris — for treating it as if it were still under UN mandate status, implying a lack of sovereignty. Furthermore, the long term objective of the Abraham Peace Accords: that a majority of Arab countries across the Middle East and North Africa recognize Israel with the Primary objective of forcing the UN itself to publicly recognize Israel as a country within the Middle East community of Nations. Israel rejects the UN Apartheid policy which excludes Israel as a member State of the Middle East voting block of nations within the UN itself.
UN Resolutions which calls for recognitin of Palestinian statehood furthermore violates the Oslo Accords. Israel a fully sovereign nation, not subject to UN trusteeship. European pressure, specifically addressed through EU participation in UN SC & GA Resolution “committee votes”, Israel interprets as “Colonial-style interference.
Post the Oct 7th 2023 Abomination War, Game Over Israeli response to the recent UN GA vote supported by former West European or Nato allied states which demanded that Israel terminate its “unlawful presence” in Palestinian territories ignores the PLO 1964 Charter which did not refer to “occupied territories” as inclusive of either the Jordanian West Bank or the Egyptian Gaza. Therefore UN 242 & 338 rewrites and ignores the PLO charter of Yasser Arafat’s PLO while it recognizes the Oslo PA as an Indepedent Palestinian State!
Israeli diplomatic doctrine openly rejects the legacy of UN-imposed frameworks and repositions the Abraham Accords as the legitimate foundation for shalom. Shalom, unlike the noun Peace, a verb which requires trust. Peace as a noun only promotes the slight of hand propaganda rhetoric and nothing of real substance.
UN Resolutions 242 & 338, historically central to the two-state solution, viewed by Israel as tools of revisionist diplomacy that undermine its sovereignty. They falsely imply Israel lost the 1948 and 1967 wars and remain under international trusteeship — a notion Israel categorically rejects.
Israel interprets these resolutions as relics of a UN system that seeks to impose outcomes via committee votes rather than direct negotiation. As such, they maintain UN Apartheid policies which adamentaly refuse to validate Zionism established through the League of Nations 1922 Palestine Mandate, based upon the Balfour Declaration signed between Israel and Britain. Since the British defeat in the 1956 War, Britain lost its status as a Great Power. Both Britain and France should not sit on the UN Secority Council as permanent members with veto powers. France lost WWII.
Israel requires direct face to face negotiations with any and all Arab Countries, based upon the latter’s recognition of political Zionism: Jewish equal rights to achieve self-determination in the Middle East and North Africa.
Arab states must recognize Jewish self-determination as rooted in the 1922 League of Nations Mandate and UN Resolution 181 (1947).
Full regional integration of Israel into the Middle East diplomatic bloc, forcing UN recognition of Israel as a legitimate regional actor.
All UN Resolutions demanding Israel withdraw from “unlawful presence” in Palestinian territories are seen as illegitimate. Israel’s “Game Over” response signals a final break with European and UN diplomatic frameworks.
London, Paris, and EU allies are accused of treating Israel as a UN mandate territory, perpetuating colonial-style interference. UN recognition of Palestinian statehood bypasses the Oslo framework, which requires bilateral negotiation.
PLO Charter (1964): Did not claim West Bank or Gaza — undermining the historical basis for current UN territorial claims. UN Resolution 3379: “Zionism is Racism” (revoked in 1991) remains a symbolic grievance in Israeli diplomatic memory. Game Over – Israel demands that Britain and France lose their Great Power status in the UN Security Council. British/EU imperialism\colonialism Israel categorically rejects. France lost WWII and both countries lost the 1956 Suez War. Solid proof that neither country qualifies as a great power. Furthermore Israel as a nuclear power, based upon UN hostility to the existence of political Zionism and the Jewish state, requires permanent member status on the Security Council inclusive of veto powers.
The UN is civilised.
Oink Oink
Just as Baal worshipers prioritized wealth and earthly gains, JeZeus warns the rich about the perils of reliance on material wealth. But whereas the Books of the NaCH Prophets prioritizes pursuit of righteous judicial courtroom justice, not so the plagiarized gospel (Protocols of the Elders of Zionism) Roman forgery.
The Gospels plagiarize the T’NaCH. A classic example the 40 day fast of JeZeus in the Sinai desert. Which attempts to duplicate the revelation of the Torah at Sinai and Elijah’s fleeing to the wilderness away from the wrath of the foreign Queen of Israel after the public slaughter of the prophets of Baal.
Such plagiarism seeks to prove that JeZeus “fulfilled” the words of the prophets. Ignorant and oblivious to the simple fact that prophets do not predict the future as does witchcraft but rather commands prophetic mussar applicable – across the board – to all generations of the Chosen Cohen people for all eternity. The gospel counterfeit thus compares to the Czar secret police “Protocols of the Elders of Zionism”.
Such replacement theology defines the Av tumah avoda zarah sin of the Golden Calf wherein the ערב רב assimilated and intermarried Israelites who came out of Egyptian slavery lacked all יראת אלהים, and hence these mixed multitudes who define the eternal war against Amalek Jews named their Golden Calf אלהים similar to which the NT and Koran gave new Names to their theologically created Gods.
This analogy which compares the New Testament to Baal, suggests that the creation of new theological constructs (such as the Christian understanding of God), akin to the Israelites assimilating pagan practices during their time in the wilderness. The cultural assimilation of Jews throughout the generations, and its impact on the perversion religious belief which prioritizes belief in theologically constructed Gods rather than the pursuit of judicial common law justice wherein the courts enforce fair compensation of damages inflicted by one Party upon another Party. Av tuma avoda zarah always prioritizes belief in Gods above the importance of righteous judicial common law courtrooms.
The UN is civilised. Learn how to correctly spell moron. “Civilized” had nothing what so ever to do with the League of Nations nor the UN. Idiot.
Fool – I’m not American!!
Duh! Nazi European British pig.
Based upon the response of my last article, the volume and diversity of reactions caused me to re-write a second part to the original document.
This 2nd Parsha of the Book of בראשית, Parshat Noach. The opening two Parshaot serve as an introduction of the Torah which formally begins with the 3rd Parsha – the introduction of Avraham the father of the chosen Cohen people. What do the opening first two Parshaot of בראשית introduce? This fundamentally basic question – it defines these two Parshaot.
Notice that the Torah introduces the Name אלהים rather than the שם השם לשמה. Herein serves as an introduction to the 7th Oral Torah middah רב חסד, which the Talmud interprets to mean as מאי נפקא מינא? The 7th Oral Torah attribute spirit distinguishes – something like as does the קידוש\הבדלה of shabbat the distinction between Av tohor time-oriented commandments from positive commandments. A fundamental מאי נפקא מינא wherein the Talmud discerns that the former Av Torah commandments require “k’vanna (an as yet undefined term which fundamentally requires definition) whereas the latter Torah mitzvot do not require k’vanna/כוונה.
The aggadic mussar story of the Book of בראשית, not at all challenged by the late 19th Century German Higher Criticism. The catastrophic events of the World Wars prompted a reevaluation of Enlightenment ideals, including the objectivity and rationality that underpinned Higher Critical methods. Scholars began to question the biases inherent in historical analysis. Post Shoah no more get out of jail free for Xtianity, with its Nazi rat-lines to prevent the execution of justice upon Nazi war criminals.
Fear of Heaven shapes the reputation of both Man in general and religious institutions in particular. The alliance between Lutheranism and Nazism during the Nazi regime in Germany presents a complex and troubling history which ultimately undermined late 19th Century German Higher Criticism. That both Catholic and Protestant Xtianity aided and assisted the Nazis. Pope Pius XII failed to even protest the Nazi slaughter of Rome’s Jews! Actions speak louder than priests or pastors screaming “Fear God”. The Nazi systematic slaughter of 75% of Western European Jewry while the Xtian church ignored oppression, theft, injustice and genocide permanently destroyed the good name of Xtianity.
Had the church condemned FDR’s decision to embrace Chamberlain’s White Paper and bar European refugees entrance to America perhaps the charge that the Xtian church lacks Fear of Heaven, would not stick to all eternity thereafter. Fear of Heaven, means protecting the Good Name reputation – just that simple. Post Shoah, Hitler and his Nazi SS mafia permanently destroyed the Good Name reputation of all branches of Xtianity; starting with German Protestant ‘Higher Criticism. Higher Criticism, which began to deconstruct traditional interpretations tied to authoritarian and nationalistic ideologies.
Perhaps the Talmud did not clarify crystal clear when Goyim abandoned all together the Brit faith and ipso facto worshipped other Gods. The בראשית aggadic mussar story therefore opens with אלהים כלל rather than the שם השם לשמה פרט. Why did HaShem accept the korban of young Hev’el and reject the Cohen First-born son Cain’s korban? The Torah revelation validate both types of korbanot! The Torah contains the רמז word ברית אש\בראשית. Just as the dispute between the two sons of Adam equally reflected in the רמז word ב’ ראשית. Rabbi Yechuda Ha’Nasi interprets the language of kre’a shma בכל לבבך\כם based upon the Torah precedent: ב’ ראשית, two opposing Yatzirot struggle within the heart like as did Esau and Yaacov wrestled within the womb of Rivka.
Therefore, when exactly did the Goyim reject the ברית אש\בראשית? Concerning the two korbanot dedicated by the two opposing sons of Adam, Hevel’s korban accepted because his k’vanna dedicated the korban through the Torah oath (שם ומלכות) in the Name of the Creation oath brit. Cain’s korban rejected because his korban lacked k’vanna. Hence the distinction between Av tohor time-oriented commandments which require k’vanna from positive תולדות commandments which do not require k’vanna. Do the תולדות follow the Avot? This defining מאי נפקא מינא detail both mesechtot Shabbat and Baba Kama ask – this very question! Clearly the distinction in the case of the two opposing “Yatzirot” of Adam: Doing mitzvot stam does not follow doing mitzvot with the k’vanna of “oath brit”.
ולשת גם הוא ילד בן ויקרא את שמו אנוש אז הוחל לקרא בשם השם.
Following the murder of Hevel, Chava the wife of Adam gave birth to a third son. This third son, who did he follow? The masoret of murdered Hevel or the masoret of Cain? Touching Enosh, the Tanna Targum Onkelos writes: בכן ביומוהי חלו בני אנשא מלצלאה בשמא דהשם. Rashi, an early major Reshon, interprets – אז הוחל. לשון חולין, לקרת את שמות האדם ואת שמות העצבים בשמו של הקדוש ברוך רבים. הוא, לעשותן אלילים ולקרותן אלהות
Recall that the HaShem permitted Adam to call the created animals names in the last p’suk prior to the third aliya to the Torah. But the first born cohen son of שת, the son born after Cain murder Hevel. The Targum employs the verb מלצלאה בשמא דהשם. They prayed to HaShem. Whereas the Rashi explanation the 2nd generation אנוש, comparable to Chava’s: ותאמר האשה אל הנחש מפרי עץ הגן נאכל ומפרי העץ אשר בתוך הגן אמר אלהים לא תאכלו ממנו ולא תגעו בן פן תמתון. Chava added on to the original commandment as did the 2nd generation of Adam, Enosh, who started naming the stars with Divine Names. Just as the snake deceived Chava so to later down stream generations did a ירידות הדורות domino effect and stared worshipping other אלהים. This action of avoda zarah created Man created Gods in the image of Man.
Mesechta Sanhedrin asks the famous question: What caused the Flood disaster in the days of Noach? Answer ברית אש, the fire of the brit sworn oaths (שם ומלכות); the generation of Noach made false oaths! A Torah oath has the power to create through tohor time-oriented Av Torah commandments מלאכים; a Torah oath fundamentally requires שם ומלכות. But only Av tumah avoda zarah assumes that man can create Gods by means of swearing a Torah oath. This tumah yatzir/Yatzir Ha’Raw within the heart literally reads בראשית ברא אלהים. Attempts to create Gods יש מאין profanes ברית אש\בראשית. Herein the מאי נפקא מינא which distinguishes tohor middot from tumah middot; the Divine service of the chosen Cohen people forever separates Shabbat from Chol, זמן גרמא מצוות מן תולדות מצוות.
Its the discernment of fine distinctions which separates like from like which defines the concept of “understanding”. Upon this יסוד breathes the Divine Spirit רב חסד. This middah discerns time-oriented commandments which require k’vanna from תולדות commandments which do not require k’vanna. HaShem accepted the korban of 2nd born Hevel because he dedicated the korban לשם ברית. HaShem rejected the korban of Adam’s first born son Cain, because he dedicated his korban – as a reactionary barbeque unto Heaven. A fundamental מאי נפקא מינא.
The concepts discussed this text concerning Prophetic Mussar vs. Higher Criticism – likened to strategic elements in American football, where the interplay of different philosophies and techniques shapes the game’s outcomes. The interpretation of religious texts, particularly the T’NaCH and Talmud, through the lens of Protestant Higher Criticism highlights a significant divide similar to competing teams in sports. This comparison illustrates how differing interpretations can create rival perspectives akin to the dynamics observed in competitive sports.
The ethical conflicts discussed, like the rejection of Cain’s offering, resemble the moral decisions players and coaches face during the game. Decisions made in split seconds can have far-reaching implications, just as ethical considerations shape spiritual narratives. The tensions between different interpretations of faith parallel heated rivalries in American football, where teams vie for dominance based on different strategies—some focusing on offense (like allowing emotional decisions to guide Korban choices), while others emphasize defense (like the analytical approach of Higher Criticism, showing how such a path leads to a 4th down punt or worse a fumble or interception.)
Protestant Higher Criticism perceives the T’NaCH as a historical document rather than instruction which teaches mussar as it applies to the generations. The former compare to placing an idol upon a plinth pedestal and worshipping this superior theologically created being – as a God. Both Xtianity and Islam do exactly this with their treatment and behavior toward Jesus and Muhammad. Recall when western magazines mocked Muhammad and Muslims physically attacked both institutions and persons. Salman Rushdie’s “The Satanic Verses” declared blasphemous by many in the Muslim community which resulted in Rushdie hiding for his life. The Salem witch trials, between February 1692 and May 1693. The Puritans, held strong beliefs in the supernatural. They viewed the world as a battleground between God and the Devil, leading to fears of witches as instruments of evil.
Both this and that absolutely insist that Jesus and Muhammad lived as historical persons. Protestant Higher Criticism denounced the Hebrew T’NaCH as a fraud. They declared that multiple authors actually wrote the Torah and say the book of Isaiah over the span of centuries. This idea that “scholarship” must interpret T’NaCH literature as physical and historical rather than as mussar rebukes equally applicable to all persons in all generations separates Traditional Judaism from Conservative and Reform Judaism which likewise views the T’NaCH as primarily historical documents.
Hence how a person interprets the T’NaCH and Talmud pits two or more sets of opposing teams. The same equally applies scholarly disputes within the Talmud itself. Publication of the Rambam’s Yad Hazakah exploded into a Jewish Civil War whose impact destroyed generations of Jews even after Napoleon freed Western European Jews from the Catholic ghetto gulags of three Centuries. The Rambam Civil War pits judicial Talmudic common law against assimilated Greek/Roman statute laws. Four part פרדס inductive logic against three part Syllogism deductive logic. Just as sports teams build their programs around acquiring the best talented players, so to T’NaCH and Talmudic scholarship disputed and fought over down through the millennium.
The violent reactions to perceived blasphemy, such as attacks following disrespect towards religious figures (Muhammad, Jesus), parallel heated rivalries in sports, where fans quite often react vehemently against perceived slights to their teams or athletes in both American and European football. Competing interpretations of sacred texts create a dialogue similar to rival teams focusing on their strengths and weaknesses. The debate over Talmudic interpretation—judicial common law vs. foreign legislative statute law—resembles the endless strategizing that teams engage in to outmaneuver their opponents.
The tension between interpretations of the T’NaCH and Talmud can be likened to rivalry in sports, where competing teams navigate through a complex landscape of strategies, beliefs, and interpretations. Just as sports teams flourish through their scholar-like understanding of gameplay and competition, religious communities develop their unique culture, customs, identities and philosophies around the interpretation of sacred texts—creating a dynamic and ongoing dialogue, in fact – quite similar to violent conflict between the fans in the world of sports. A rich tapestry of beliefs and practices that, while distinct, often results in far wider fan clashes inside and outside both arenas and society. Violence influences wider cultural and social dynamics across American and European societies which inherit hatred which equals the Sunni Shiite rivalry which divides Arab and Muslim civilizations.
Just as Baal worshipers prioritized wealth and earthly gains, JeZeus warns the rich about the perils of reliance on material wealth. But whereas the Books of the NaCH Prophets prioritizes pursuit of righteous judicial courtroom justice, not so the plagiarized gospel (Protocols of the Elders of Zionism) Roman forgery.
The Gospels plagiarize the T’NaCH. A classic example the 40 day fast of JeZeus in the Sinai desert. Which attempts to duplicate the revelation of the Torah at Sinai and Elijah’s fleeing to the wilderness away from the wrath of the foreign Queen of Israel after the public slaughter of the prophets of Baal.
Such plagiarism seeks to prove that JeZeus “fulfilled” the words of the prophets. Ignorant and oblivious to the simple fact that prophets do not predict the future as does witchcraft but rather commands prophetic mussar applicable – across the board – to all generations of the Chosen Cohen people for all eternity. The gospel counterfeit thus compares to the Czar secret police “Protocols of the Elders of Zionism”.
Such replacement theology defines the Av tumah avoda zarah sin of the Golden Calf wherein the ערב רב assimilated and intermarried Israelites who came out of Egyptian slavery lacked all יראת אלהים, and hence these mixed multitudes who define the eternal war against Amalek Jews named their Golden Calf אלהים similar to which the NT and Koran gave new Names to their theologically created Gods.
This analogy which compares the New Testament to Baal, suggests that the creation of new theological constructs (such as the Christian understanding of God), akin to the Israelites assimilating pagan practices during their time in the wilderness. The cultural assimilation of Jews throughout the generations, and its impact on the perversion religious belief which prioritizes belief in theologically constructed Gods rather than the pursuit of judicial common law justice wherein the courts enforce fair compensation of damages inflicted by one Party upon another Party. Av tuma avoda zarah always prioritizes belief in Gods above the importance of righteous judicial common law courtrooms.
Who cares??
Xtianity and Islam embrace over 2 billion people who care. Idiot.
Blood Libels defines the Yatzir Ha’Raw spirits within the hearts of all Goyim throughout the generations. Post the Oct 7th Abomination massacre by Hamas, almost immediately came the blood libel slander of “Genocide”. But post the ’67 War the blood libel revisionist history introduced by both Britain and France: the 242 declaration that peace only achievable in the Middle East through a UN “internatioanal law” dictate upon Israel!
The semantic shift in the phrase “territoires occupés” between 1964 and post-1967 UN usage exposes the deliberate retroactive redefinition that Arab and European diplomats engineered after the Six-Day War. The Palestine National Covenant (1964)—ratified three years before 242—defines “Palestine” as the “occupied” land within the British Mandate borders, excluding the West Bank (then under Jordanian sovereignty) and Gaza (under Egyptian control).
Weigh now the hostile blood libel language of “the” French UN 242 post war revisionist history. The French official text uses “des territoires occupés” — which in French usage is normally read as “from “the” occupied territories” (i.e., with “the” definite sense). That phrasing more naturally supports the French holier than thou, reading that Israel should withdraw from the territories (the entirety of those occupied in 1948! The French wording and the preamble’s “inadmissibility of acquisition of territory by war” buttress an interpretation that envisages full withdrawal, which includes even West Jerusalem! Recall the Vatican demanded in 1947 the Jerusalem exist as an Internationally ruled City, similar to Post WWII Berlin. Many continental and Arab states, and many subsequent UN framings, preferred this reading.
The French text gave political cover to states and blocs pressing for “the” full Israeli withdrawal from “48 occupied territories”; the English text gave the drafters (Caradon, Goldberg et al.) a way to frame 242 as a negotiating framework rather than an immediate, absolute mandate for total withdrawal from ’67 “recaptured territories”. A fundamental presumption by both London and Paris. Both versions fundamentally err. Israel simply not a UN protectorate territory wherein the UN determines its borders like as attempted by the Peel Commission. Britain and France, nor any other UN Security Council States, determine the international borders of Israel. And how much more so the Capital City of Israel. Yet these hostile states promote revisionist history and refuse to recognize Jerusalem as the Capital of Israel! Both versions of UN 242 an utter fraud.
Hence the distinction between the British and French versions of 242 represents a Good Cop vs. Bad Cop propaganda rhetoric to justify the dismantling of Zionism’s pre WWI platform that Jews have equal rights to achieve self-determination in the Middle East. All Arab Israeli Wars ever fought, including the Oct 7th Abomination War reflects the Blood Libel Racism spirits which breaths within the Yatzir Ha’Raw hearts of all Goyim – both Arab/Muslims and European/Russians.
Silly boy!! Religious twaddle!! No wonder there are so many stupid brainwashed fanatics!
Johnny Foreigner just a fat stupid mother fucker.
pig your European and English – the definition of slut.
You sound like an ignorant twerp. I leave your rudeness and stupidity up for all to see and judge.
Johnny foreigner Fuck YOU
We are talking about serious issues of life, death, war crimes, genocide and terrorism. They involve political policies. If you are incapable of putting forward any sensible views and are only capable of childish playground abuse then kindly refrain.
Johnny Foreigner you preach only your one hand clapping bull shit.
Silly boy!
Johnny Foreigner Fuck YOU.
Johnny Foreigner https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hT9lvSM1RSQ
Childish
Johnny Foreigner Fuck YOU
Nazi
Johnny Foreigner Fuck YOU