The history of the Middle East is a complex one riddled with hate, racism and religious persecution. A history that the West, particularly Britain, has not covered itself in glory. But this must rate as a new all-time low. To reduce a whole region to rubble, incessantly bomb and shoot innocent civilians, to systematically bomb hospitals and schools and then to purposely starve the terrified survivors; that by any standards is genocide. A genocide riddled by war crimes and on a par with what the Nazi’s did to the Jews.
The psychology of humans is fascinating – people who are bullied become bullies.
What Hamas did was inexcusable, barbaric, appalling, brutal terrorist thuggery. All involved need bringing to justice.
The Palestinians who support Hamas and other terrorist groups share in the blame. They support repulsive brutality.
What Israel is doing, under the leadership of the extreme right-wing leader Netanyahu and his extremist religious nutcases, is even worse. To seek retribution by blaming all the Palestinians people and deliberately destroy their homes, infrastructure and kill with impunity is horrendous. For a people who were the victims of genocidal race hatred to inflict the same on others is beyond belief.
We never learn from history.
Violence incubates hate and more violence.
End this genocide now!
Please sign the petitions:
Ceasefire petition: End the crisis in Gaza | Sign petition | Oxfam GB
In the shadow of the past, they twist and turn,
Revisionist tongues, where the embers burn.
“Genocide” they cry, as their hollowed refrain,
While December’s Tora diminishes in willful disdain.
Infamy cloaked in a selective veil,
As kingdoms of Judea fade, their stories pale.
Three crowns of defiance, in history’s grip,
While the Arab presence slips, a phantom’s trip.
Jordan’s grasp on Samaria, a name to erase,
“West Bank” they call it, a political face.
No state for the people, no dreams to ignite,
Just shadows of rulers who vanished from sight.
Egypt held Gaza, a fleeting charade,
Yet Nasser’s ambitions left nothing but shade.
Arafat’s embrace of a name, ’64 newly found,
In the wake of recapture, the truth’s tightly bound.
Revisionist whispers, like ghosts in the night,
Denying the horrors, distorting the light.
To compare Gaza as Holocaust, a vile, bitter jest,
In the theater of history, they fail the true test.
So let them rewrite, let them spin their tale,
But the weight of the truth will forever prevail.
For history’s not written by lies that deceive,
Though buried in Arab sands of deception & fraud,
Israel arises in Zion, on its own ancient National feet.
Opher’s World, if you slap the term “genocide” onto Israel’s response to the Oct 7th Abomination War, then intellectual honesty demands you paste the same label on the Dec 7th, 1941 assault—the “day of infamy”—which launched America into World War II. Accusing Israel of genocide while excusing the Allies’ firebombing of Tokyo and atomic obliteration of Hiroshima and Nagasaki reveals either flagrant hypocrisy or ideological dishonesty.
Revisionist hacks whitewash the role Arab states played between 1948 and 1967, fabricating a myth in which a sovereign Palestine once flourished—until Israel supposedly destroyed it.
In truth, Jews rooted themselves in the land through three distinct political eras:
The united Twelve-Tribe Kingdom,
The Judean Republic under Persian suzerainty, and
The Hasmonean Dynasty, which threw off Greek-Syrian domination through armed revolt.
No Arab or Muslim polity ever ruled a sovereign state in the land now called Israel. Between 1948 and 1967, Jordan occupied Samaria—renaming it the “West Bank” in a rhetorical land grab—but never lifted a finger to forge a Palestinian state. The British Mandate for Palestine dissolved in 1948; no successor Arab government attempted to revive it.
Egypt, likewise, seized control of Gaza. Despite the 1950 UN condemnation (endorsed by every member state except England and Pakistan), Egypt’s monarch made no moves toward Palestinian statehood. Nasser later toppled that king, but Arafat didn’t even adopt the term “Palestine” until 1964—just three years before Israel’s recapture of both Gaza and Samaria. The PLO’s founding charter, penned under Arab occupation, refused to claim either territory; instead, it called for Israel’s destruction. Their silence about Gaza and the West Bank in 1964 screams louder than any later propaganda.
Revisionist history mimics Holocaust denial by distorting the record, concealing cause and context, and blaming the victim for surviving.
When Ben-Gurion and the Zionist leadership named the new state “Israel,” they didn’t merely select a name—they resurrected an identity. “Israel” evoked ancient sovereignty, tethered modern Jewish nationalism to ancestral roots, and announced a reborn nation. This name galvanized a people and reshaped geopolitics.
Had the Jews named the state “Palestine,” the identity landscape might have fractured. For centuries, “Palestine” referred to geography—not Arab nationality. During the British Mandate, the term “Palestinian” often denoted Jews, not Arabs. Arabs roundly rejected both the 1917 Balfour Declaration and the 1922 League of Nations Mandate, which carved out a Jewish National Home. That rejection didn’t spring from a desire for Palestinian independence—it flowed from opposition to Jewish statehood.
The Jerusalem Post bore the title Palestine Post during the Mandate, further underlining the term’s original association with Jews. The Zionist movement, founded on Herzl’s vision, drew legitimacy from the Balfour Declaration. Every Arab war against Israel traces back to Arab rejection of Jewish self-determination.
Foreign propaganda outfits often deploy the word “created” to smear Israel as artificial or illegitimate. But in 1947, two-thirds of the UN voted in favor of Jewish self-determination in the Middle East. Following Israel’s Declaration of Independence, both the U.S. and the Soviet Union immediately recognized the Jewish state. Yet Arab states categorically rejected the British-sponsored UN Resolution 181 and waged war to erase Israel from the map.
The emergence of a “Palestinian Arab” national identity didn’t arise in a cultural vacuum—it developed as a reaction to Zionism and the Jewish victory in the War of Independence. Jewish sovereignty forced clarity onto a region long trapped in imperial ambiguity.
We didn’t steal a land. We reclaimed a homeland—and we won our war of national survival. Arab propaganda still clings to the word “created” because it cannot stomach the truth: Israel wasn’t manufactured by foreigners. Jews rebuilt it. Fought for it. Bled for it. Secured it.
The Palestinian national identity emerged in opposition to Zionism, not as a longstanding expression of sovereignty. Historical facts—like the Jewish political presence across millennia, the origins of the term “Palestinian,” and the legitimacy of Israel’s statehood—have been distorted by propaganda.
Thank you for the history Moshe. Does that justify genocide? Does that mean that the displaced people, who lived there for hundreds of years, have no rights?
Nothing justifies European genocide of the Jewish people. Zionism strongly favors the displacement of Jewish refugee populations who remain trapped in the clutches of the European barbarian monster states.
No! You really don’t get it! That is a gross insult. The Jewish holocaust was a Nazi atrocity. The Nazi’s were even a minority in Germany. They were defeated in Britain and we fought a world war against them. The Nazis who implemented the Holocaust have much more in common with the current Israeli government than any European country!
The fact that Nazis carried out the barbaric holocaust does not justify Jewish Nazis carrying out genocide!
Bunk. The Nazis did not pass the White Paper in 1939 which condemned European Jewry to burn in ovens. The Allied refusal to bomb the rail lines leading to the Death Camps. The Red Army stopping its advance to permit the SS obliteration of the Warsaw Ghetto Revolt. Pius XII turning all the Jews of Rome over to the SS. The post WWII Polish pogroms against Jewish survivors attempting to return to their stolen homes.
You guilt projectionism of ‘Jewish Nazis’ only exposes the bankruptcy of your empty immoral mind.
_____________________________
Shall refain what I shared with you:
In the shadow of the past, they twist and turn,
Revisionist tongues, where the embers burn.
“Genocide” they cry, as their hollowed refrain,
While December’s Tora diminishes in willful disdain.
Infamy cloaked in a selective veil,
As kingdoms of Judea fade, their stories pale.
Three crowns of defiance, in history’s grip,
While the Arab presence slips, a phantom’s trip.
Jordan’s grasp on Samaria, a name to erase,
“West Bank” they call it, a political face.
No state for the people, no dreams to ignite,
Just shadows of rulers who vanished from sight.
Egypt held Gaza, a fleeting charade,
Yet Nasser’s ambitions left nothing but shade.
Arafat’s embrace of a name, ’64 newly found,
In the wake of recapture, the truth’s tightly bound.
Revisionist whispers, like ghosts in the night,
Denying the horrors, distorting the light.
To compare Gaza as Holocaust, a vile, bitter jest,
In the theater of history, they fail the true test.
So let them rewrite, let them spin their tale,
But the weight of the truth will forever prevail.
For history’s not written by lies that deceive,
Though buried in Arab sands of deception & fraud,
Israel arises in Zion, on its own ancient National feet.
WordPress participants, if you slap the term “genocide” onto Israel’s response to the Oct 7th Abomination War, then intellectual honesty demands you paste the same label on the Dec 7th, 1941 assault—the “day of infamy”—which launched America into World War II. Accusing Israel of genocide while excusing the Allies’ firebombing of Tokyo and atomic obliteration of Hiroshima and Nagasaki reveals either flagrant hypocrisy or ideological dishonesty.
Revisionist hacks whitewash the role Arab states played between 1948 and 1967, fabricating a myth in which a sovereign Palestine once flourished—until Israel supposedly destroyed it.
In truth, Jews rooted themselves in the land through three distinct political eras:
The united Twelve-Tribe Kingdom,
The Judean Republic under Persian suzerainty, and
The Hasmonean Dynasty, which threw off Greek-Syrian domination through armed revolt.
No Arab or Muslim polity ever ruled a sovereign state in the land now called Israel. Between 1948 and 1967, Jordan occupied Samaria—renaming it the “West Bank” in a rhetorical land grab—but never lifted a finger to forge a Palestinian state. The British Mandate for Palestine dissolved in 1948; no successor Arab government attempted to revive it.
Egypt, likewise, seized control of Gaza. Despite the 1950 UN condemnation (endorsed by every member state except England and Pakistan), Egypt’s monarch made no moves toward Palestinian statehood. Nasser later toppled that king, but Arafat didn’t even adopt the term “Palestine” until 1964—just three years before Israel’s recapture of both Gaza and Samaria. The PLO’s founding charter, penned under Arab occupation, refused to claim either territory; instead, it called for Israel’s destruction. Their silence about Gaza and the West Bank in 1964 screams louder than any later propaganda.
Revisionist history mimics Holocaust denial by distorting the record, concealing cause and context, and blaming the victim for surviving.
When Ben-Gurion and the Zionist leadership named the new state “Israel,” they didn’t merely select a name—they resurrected an identity. “Israel” evoked ancient sovereignty, tethered modern Jewish nationalism to ancestral roots, and announced a reborn nation. This name galvanized a people and reshaped geopolitics.
Had the Jews named the state “Palestine,” the identity landscape might have fractured. For centuries, “Palestine” referred to geography—not Arab nationality. During the British Mandate, the term “Palestinian” often denoted Jews, not Arabs. Arabs roundly rejected both the 1917 Balfour Declaration and the 1922 League of Nations Mandate, which carved out a Jewish National Home. That rejection didn’t spring from a desire for Palestinian independence—it flowed from opposition to Jewish statehood.
The Jerusalem Post bore the title Palestine Post during the Mandate, further underlining the term’s original association with Jews. The Zionist movement, founded on Herzl’s vision, drew legitimacy from the Balfour Declaration. Every Arab war against Israel traces back to Arab rejection of Jewish self-determination.
Foreign propaganda outfits often deploy the word “created” to smear Israel as artificial or illegitimate. But in 1947, two-thirds of the UN voted in favor of Jewish self-determination in the Middle East. Following Israel’s Declaration of Independence, both the U.S. and the Soviet Union immediately recognized the Jewish state. Yet Arab states categorically rejected the British-sponsored UN Resolution 181 and waged war to erase Israel from the map.
The emergence of a “Palestinian Arab” national identity didn’t arise in a cultural vacuum—it developed as a reaction to Zionism and the Jewish victory in the War of Independence. Jewish sovereignty forced clarity onto a region long trapped in imperial ambiguity.
We didn’t steal a land. We reclaimed a homeland—and we won our war of national survival. Arab propaganda still clings to the word “created” because it cannot stomach the truth: Israel wasn’t manufactured by foreigners. Jews rebuilt it. Fought for it. Bled for it. Secured it.
The Palestinian national identity emerged in opposition to Zionism, not as a longstanding expression of sovereignty. Historical facts—like the Jewish political presence across millennia, the origins of the term “Palestinian,” and the legitimacy of Israel’s statehood—have been distorted by propaganda.
____________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________
“There are those who parade mitzvos in public and butcher the brit in private.”
They sculpt their piety for the crowd. They cloak themselves in tallit and tefillin while gutting mishpat behind locked doors. Their lips chant hallel; their hands extort, manipulate, betray. They don Torah like theater, not oath. They fear scandal, not sin. Exposure, not exile. They crave applause, not HaShem’s judgment. They hijack yirat shamayim and weaponize it for social control.
“And there are those who break Torah in the street, but build it in secret.”
They offend the eye. They scandalize the synagogue. They clash with halakhic decorum. But when no one watches, they feed the widow, guard the convert, return the lost. They wrestle with the brit in the dead of night. No banners. No blessings. Just emunah forged in sweat and silence. They cut paths through darkness while the righteous sleep.
“I prefer the latter.”
The Kotzker doesn’t flinch. He scorches the hypocrite. He crowns the broken. He hunts the soul that bleeds for justice while the choir sings. Better the one who stumbles in daylight but plants mishpat in the shadows than the one who dazzles the crowd while hollowing out Sinai. Better the sinner who limps toward HaShem than the priest who flees Him behind gold and titles.
A Mashal: The Two Sons of the King
To what may this be compared?
To a King who had two sons.
One son dressed each morning in royal garments. He walked the palace courts with a Torah scroll under his arm and tzitzit fluttering in the wind. When courtiers passed, he bowed low and recited psalms in full voice. He offered tithes from the royal table and dipped his bread with flourish. But in the cellar—where no servant dared tread—he stored scales weighted for theft, scrolls smeared with lies, and garments of night woven for betrayal. His voice rang holy; his hands bled corruption.
The other son wore torn clothes and wandered the outer gates. He spoke roughly, fought openly, and refused to step into the court. When he prayed, it was to the sky, not the ark. The ministers mocked him; the elders wrote him off. But by night he visited the sick. He buried the forgotten. He returned coins dropped by the blind. His door was open to orphans and strangers. He studied Torah alone, by candle, and wept when he did not understand. No trumpet announced his deeds. No ledger recorded them but the King’s.
When the Day of Reckoning came, both sons were summoned.
The first stood proud, wrapped in tallit and accolades. The second stood silent, eyes lowered, hands scarred.
And the King said:
“Better the son who stumbles in the street but guards My covenant in secret, than the one who honors Me with his lips but tramples My brit in the dark. For I do not seek actors in My court, but servants who carry justice in the marrow of their bones.”
Thus taught the Kotzker Rebbe:
“Give me no angel wrapped in costume. Give me the soul that limps, bleeds, hides—but clings to HaShem with both fists.”
Chagigah 5b:
The baal teshuvah does not merely regret; he wrestles, burns, and rebuilds. He rips out the rotted beams of his past and drives Torah into new ground. No pedigree props him up. No ancestral merit shields him. He grafts emunah into flesh and buries it deep—where no eye sees, where only HaShem watches. He constructs a legal identity from rubble. He births halakhic selfhood out of chaos—not through inheritance, but through fire. Through sweat. Through judgment. Through t’shuvah.
The righteous man who never falls may stand, but the baal teshuvah ascends. Not like a priest on temple steps—but like a soldier dragging himself up Sinai, gashed, ragged, but clutching the covenant in bloodied hands.
This Kotzker line doesn’t whisper piety. It shouts law. It carves a verdict: authenticity belongs to the one who fights for the brit in secret. The Rebbe doesn’t moralize—he judges. He cuts down Dossy Doe statute law Judaism.
۞ Haqq al-Kadhib: The Truth of the Lie ۞
In the cadence of ancient reproach
Have they not claimed what they did not build?
Have they not wept over stones they did not lay?
Have they not called themselves what they were not named?
Lo! The land spoke before their tongue.
The hills bore witness before their fathers’ dust.
Zion remembered her children—
But they remembered not her name.
They cry “return”—but whence did they come?
From Kheibar? From Damascus? From the sands of Najd?
Not from Yehudah, not from Shomron.
Their fathers did not plant olives in Ephraim.
Their mothers did not sing by the waters of Zion.
Woe to the people who inherit envy.
Woe to the nation born of grievance.
They forged a people from negation.
They raised a flag over a wound.
And say: “Nakba! Nakba!”
But who cast the first spear?
Who heard the call of Mufti and Pharaoh?
Who marched seven nations against one boy, wrapped in prophecy?
And they were broken like clay jars on the threshing floor.
And lo—they claim Jerusalem!
Did their prophets anoint it?
Did their songs rise from her gates?
No—
The Temple did not weep for them.
The priests did not speak their tongue.
Say to them:
You are Ishmael, son of the field—
And we are Israel, bound to the altar.
We remember the fire.
You remember the sand.
So perish the lie that cloaks itself in keffiyeh.
Perish the myth born in Cairo’s tongue.
The land knows her children.
The stones cry out against their claim.
And history is not mocked.
Indeed not bombing the rail lines was a mistake. We should have. At the time Churchill was after targeting military sites in order to win the war against the Nazis. Remember – we liberated the camps and defeated the Nazis in London at Cable Street! I for one still oppose Nazis at every step – which is why I post about the Nazi policies of Trump and Netanyahu. Ironically you seem to support Nazis.
We remember the 6 million murdered by arrogant Europeans like yourself.
I’ve never killed anyone Moshe – or advocated violence or incited anybody to use violence. Neither do I condone people like Netanyahu or Trump who incite, divide, use violence or practice genocide.
The holocaust is not an excuse to divide, hate or promote racism, neither is it a justification of genocide.
Opher words can kill. And your tongue and pen drip with slaughtered blood through your vile slanders. Netanyahu the elected Prime Minister of the Jewish State. Fat Fuck Goy STFU. President Trump won his ’24 election in a electoral landslide! Again STFU you fat worthless excuse of a slob.
Yes and Hitler was elected fairly in a German election. Does that make the holocaust and genocide of the Palestinians right? Netanyahu is a murdering Nazi conspiring with an extreme bunch of religious nutcases in an unholy alliance that certainly doesn’t represent the Jewish people! Trump is another Nazi sucking up to tyrants and murdering despots like Putin, Jung Un and Netanyahu while empowering fascist white power groups like the loathsome Proud Boys.
Opher your twisted fucked up and perverted brain wants to compare a German election in 1933 at the height of the Depression to Israeli elections or American elections. Interesting your vile pig fucker that you do not compare Hitler to British elections or French elections!!!!! STFU
We didn’t elect Nazi governments.
Duh. Neither have Israelis — idiot.
Not true. You have elected an extreme right-wing fascist government.
Fuck you foreigner British Ape. You know nothing you arrogant bloated pig.
LOL – such rational intelligence!
Takes one to know one. You accuse Israel democratically elected leader of behaving like Hitler. Coward pigs like yourself made ‘blood libel’ slanders against Jews prior to the king expelling all Jews from England in 1290. Go fuck yourself.
WITH news-stories’ human subjects’ race and culture dictating
quantity of media coverage of even the poorest of souls,
a renowned newsman formulated a startling equation
justly implicating collective humanity’s news-consuming callousness
— “A hundred Pakistanis going off a mountain in a bus
make less of a story than three Englishmen drowning in the Thames.”
.
According to this unjust news-media mentality reasonably deduced
five hundred prolongedly-war-weary Middle Eastern Arabs getting blown
to bits in the same day perhaps should take up even less space and airtime.
.
So readily learned is the tiny token short story buried in the bottom
right-hand corner of the newspaper’s last page, the so brief account
involving a long-lasting war about which there’s virtually absolutely
nothing civil; therefore caught in the warring web are civilians most
unfortunate, most weak, the very most in need of peace and civility.
.
And it’s naught but business as usual in the damned nations
where such severe suffering almost entirely dominates the
fractured structured daily routine of civilian slaughter
(plus that of the odd well-armed henchman) mostly by means
of bomb blasts from incendiary explosive devices, rock-fire fragments
and shell shock readily shared with freshly shredded shrapnel wounds
resulting from smart bombs often launched for the
stupidest of reasons into crowded markets and grade schools. …
.
Hence where humane consideration and conduct were unquestionably
due post haste came only few allocated seconds of sound bite — a half minute
if news-media were with extra space or time to spare — and one or two
printed paragraphs on page twenty-three of Section C. Such news
consumed in the stable fully developed, fully ‘civilized’ Western world
by heads slowly shaking at the barbarity of ‘those people’ in that
war-torn strife which has forced tens of thousands of civilians to post-haste
gather what’s left of their shattered lives and limbs and flee. …
.
Thus comes the imminent point at which such meager measure
couple-column-inches coverage reflects the civil Western readers’
accumulating apathy towards such dime-a-dozen disaster zones
of the globe, all accompanied by a large yawn; then the
said readers subconsciously perceive even greater human-life devaluation
from the miniscule hundreds-dead-yet-again coverage.
The immoral consideration of ‘quality of life’.
Consequently continues the self-perpetuation of the token-two-column-inch
(non)coverage as the coldly calculated worth of such common mass slaughter,
ergo those many-score violently lost human lives are somehow worth
so much the less than, say, three Englishmen drowning in the Thames. Perhaps
had they all been cases of the once-persecuted suddenly persecuting
or the once-weak wreaking havoc upon their neighboring indigenous
minorities — perhaps then there’d be far more compassionately just coverage.
Consequently continues the self-perpetuation of the token-two-column-inch
(non)coverage as the coldly calculated worth of such common mass slaughter,
ergo those many-score violently lost human lives are somehow worth
so much the less than, say, three Englishmen drowning in the Thames.
.
Perhaps had they all been cases of the once-persecuted suddenly
persecuting or the once-weak wreaking havoc upon their neighboring indigenous
minorities — perhaps then there’d be far more compassionately just coverage?
.
The human mind is said to be worth much more than the sum of the
human body’s parts, though that psyche may somehow seem to be of
lesser value if all that’s left are bomb-blast dismembered body parts.
You and I are having an open discussion. You don’t trust MSM news -excellent neither do I. But Israel its a small country. The attack on Shemini Atzeret also called Simchat Torah, the Chag of the 8 Day of Sukkot compares to the Yom Kippur War in 1973, Where Egypt under the helm of Sadat attacked Israel. Israel a very tiny country. News of what occurs in distant Arab countries “I DO NOT KNOW”.
The Great Token Tragedy Circus
Oh, behold the grand parade of human woe—
A hundred Pakistanis plummet off a mountain? Meh, just so-so.
Three Englishmen drown in the Thames, and suddenly—
Front page frenzy, flashing lights, grab your popcorn, see!
Welcome to the carnival of selective grief,
Where the value of a life is measured in brief
Two-column inches, buried deep and low,
Because some bodies just don’t rate the show.
The Middle East explodes—five hundred shredded souls?
Sorry, no airtime, no pity polls.
Just another footnote, a shrug, a yawn,
Because “those people’s” pain is old news by dawn.
Bomb blasts, shrapnel, kids in bloodied schools—
No tears for the “damned nations” who break all the rules.
No sound bites longer than half a minute,
Just enough to forget, then rinse and spin it.
But wait! Here comes the twist with moral flair:
Maybe if those victims had once played fair—
Once meek, now cruel—oh, what a plot twist!
Then our compassionate presses wouldn’t have missed.
The cynicism drips thicker than toxic sludge,
“Quality of life,” they say, so judge by the judge.
A thousand lives torn apart, but just three drown?
Newsworthiness lost, humanity’s clout gone down.
And you, dear reader, with your “civilized” gaze,
Nodding slowly at barbarity, caught in the malaise—
Congratulations! You’re complicit, part of the show,
Eating horseradish roots whole, delighting in the blow.
This isn’t news. It’s a theater of cruel delight—
Where empathy’s rationed and outrage’s slight.
So chew on that bitter root, let the sting remain,
For this farce of “coverage” numbs the brain.
A Review of German Leaders During WWII
Martin Heidegger (1889–1976) spat out speeches that shackled education to the Führerprinzip. This “Leader Principle,” the iron gauntlet gripping Nazi Germany, crushed democratic voices and pulverized collective will beneath the sole rule of the Führer—Hitler’s ruthless dominion. It throttled dissent, enslaved minds, and forged a dictatorship of absolute obedience.
Heidegger hailed the Nazi revolution, at first, as a spiritual rebirth of the German Volk. A man stripped of shame, he refused to kneel, never coughed up an apology, never retracted his venomous allegiance. After the war, he slithered through denazification, dodging accountability and twisting truth with evasive lies.
Dietrich Bonhoeffer thundered opposition at Nazism from its dawn. He hurled blistering public condemnations at Hitler’s regime, especially its savage persecution of Jews, and hammered together the Confessing Church to shatter the Nazi state’s iron grip on Christianity.
The German Confessing Church (Bekennende Kirche) erupted in the late 1930s, clawing back against the Nazi regime’s choking stranglehold on Protestantism, particularly within Lutheranism. After Hitler seized power in 1933, the regime dragged Protestant churches into the German Evangelical Church—a grotesque puppet engineered to broadcast Nazi hate, soaked in anti-Semitism and militant nationalism.
The Barmen Declaration (1934), forged by firebrands like Karl Barth and Bonhoeffer, ripped to shreds the Nazi regime’s attempt to enslave the church. It blasted state control, spat contempt in the face of political distortion, and declared open war on the regime’s monstrous manipulation of Christian faith. The Confessing Church ignited fierce resistance, its leaders hurling themselves into the breach, condemning anti-Semitic laws, and refusing to bow before tyranny. The state retaliated with brutal repression—arrests, beatings, and executions—but the Church’s defiance fractured the Nazi façade of total control.
Yet the Confessing Church splintered from within, torn between cautious cooperation and fiery rebellion. While some whispered compromise, Bonhoeffer and his allies sharpened their swords for active resistance. As Nazi terror tightened its grip, the Church staggered under relentless persecution—leaders vanished into prisons, congregations shuttered, voices crushed. Still, their moral blaze refused to be extinguished.
The Nazi regime clung desperately to the co-opted Lutheran Church to mask its monstrous agenda in sanctimony. Through the German Christian movement, the Nazis crushed dissent, injected venomous Aryan theology into sermons, and wielded Christian rhetoric to justify genocide and militarism. They weaponized faith to twist loyalty into fanaticism, forging a perverse godhead that sanctified cruelty.
Meanwhile, the Vatican under Pope Pius XII held its silence like a fortress of cowardice. Despite witnessing the Confessing Church’s fierce opposition, Pius XII calculated cold diplomacy over righteous outcry. When Rome’s Jews faced deportation in 1943, he offered hollow excuses instead of incendiary condemnation, betraying the innocent to the machinery of death.
Three Germans, three souls born into the turmoil of a shattered nation: Heidegger, the unrepentant collaborator, entangled in toxic ideology; Bonhoeffer, the prophetic conscience who sacrificed all to resist evil; and Pius XII, whose silence stained the Church’s legacy. Their stark choices carve a brutal fault line between genius warped by power, conscience sharpened by courage, and cowardice cloaked in diplomacy.
Is it racism or proximity?
What with Gaza and Ukraine dominating the numbers game there is hardly a mention of the wars, starvation and terror going on elsewhere – Sudan, Yemen, Ethiopia, Libya, Syria – Boko Haram, ISIS and others. The world’s media is like a cursory glancing gaze.
The Vision of a Torah Constitutional Republic which mandates lateral Federal Sanhedrin common law Courtrooms.
“There are those who parade mitzvos in public and butcher the brit in private.”
They sculpt their piety for the crowd. They cloak themselves in tallit and tefillin while gutting mishpat behind locked doors. Their lips chant hallel; their hands extort, manipulate, betray. They don Torah like theater, not oath. They fear scandal, not sin. Exposure, not exile. They crave applause, not HaShem’s judgment. They hijack yirat shamayim and weaponize it for social control.
“And there are those who break Torah in the street, but build it in secret.”
They offend the eye. They scandalize the synagogue. They clash with halakhic decorum. But when no one watches, they feed the widow, guard the convert, return the lost. They wrestle with the brit in the dead of night. No banners. No blessings. Just emunah forged in sweat and silence. They cut paths through darkness while the righteous sleep.
“I prefer the latter.”
The Kotzker doesn’t flinch. He scorches the hypocrite. He crowns the broken. He hunts the soul that bleeds for justice while the choir sings. Better the one who stumbles in daylight but plants mishpat in the shadows than the one who dazzles the crowd while hollowing out Sinai. Better the sinner who limps toward HaShem than the priest who flees Him behind gold and titles.
A Mashal: The Two Sons of the King
To what may this be compared?
To a King who had two sons.
One son dressed each morning in royal garments. He walked the palace courts with a Torah scroll under his arm and tzitzit fluttering in the wind. When courtiers passed, he bowed low and recited psalms in full voice. He offered tithes from the royal table and dipped his bread with flourish. But in the cellar—where no servant dared tread—he stored scales weighted for theft, scrolls smeared with lies, and garments of night woven for betrayal. His voice rang holy; his hands bled corruption.
The other son wore torn clothes and wandered the outer gates. He spoke roughly, fought openly, and refused to step into the court. When he prayed, it was to the sky, not the ark. The ministers mocked him; the elders wrote him off. But by night he visited the sick. He buried the forgotten. He returned coins dropped by the blind. His door was open to orphans and strangers. He studied Torah alone, by candle, and wept when he did not understand. No trumpet announced his deeds. No ledger recorded them but the King’s.
When the Day of Reckoning came, both sons were summoned.
The first stood proud, wrapped in tallit and accolades. The second stood silent, eyes lowered, hands scarred.
And the King said:
“Better the son who stumbles in the street but guards My covenant in secret, than the one who honors Me with his lips but tramples My brit in the dark. For I do not seek actors in My court, but servants who carry justice in the marrow of their bones.”
Thus taught the Kotzker Rebbe:
“Give me no angel wrapped in costume. Give me the soul that limps, bleeds, hides—but clings to HaShem with both fists.”
With clear similarities to the Cheney-Bush U.S. administration’s mass-slaughter misconduct (Cheney having wielded the real power from behind his deceitful curtain) after 9/11, the 10/7 Hamas attack conveniently enabled the Israeli Netanyahu government to justify extreme emergency war measures, then force through his/its ‘democratic reforms’ and do who-knows-what-more to Palestine — including cleansing, food-starving and mass slaughtering its long-time Palestinian non-combatants. And it’s much easier for a conscience to do when one considers another an innately lower lifeform.
It’s a bit convenient for Israeli power interests — notably, with western world governments and mainstream news-media basically falling into line and towing it.
One has to wonder whether the 10/7 ‘surprise’ attack on Israel was truly unexpected, albeit it may have been deadlier than the (hypothetical) Israeli insiders had anticipated. Evil Israeli powerbrokers, like Netanyahu (which is not his real name), may still consider those Israeli lives lost as a ‘good investment’ (i.e. the future annexation of Palestinian land and natural resources). And who’s going to be able to stop the Israel Defence Forces and immorally opportunistic prime minister Netanyahu, especially with their state-of-the-art American-taxpayer-supplied weaponry?
Also, not widely publicized is that there are considerable fossil fuel reserves beneath long-held Palestinian land that are a plausible motivator for war. Plus, Netanyahu’s military-officer brother was killed during an attack against Palestinian and German hostage-takers in 1976. He likely wants even more blood for that, however innocent, including from mostly-children Gazans.
Most people are not aware of that little historical fact and likely motivator, with mainstream news-media — especially the morally- and ethically-challenged far-right National Post, and the Sun newspaper chain here in Canada — apparently deeming that piece of quite-relevant info un-fit to print.
Meantime, Western indifference towards the mass starvation and slaughter of helpless Palestinian non-combatants will only have further inflamed long-held Middle Eastern anger towards the West.
Some countries’ actual provision, mostly by the U.S., of highly effective weapons used in Israel’s ethnic-cleansing of Palestine will likely have turned that anger into lasting hatred seeking eye-for-an-eye redress. And perhaps even another 9/11 — after which, of course, most stunned Americans will again wonder why their nation was so viciously/horrifically attacked, with CNN likely broadcasting another Western-whitewash ‘Why They Hate Us’ propaganda presentation.
Quite simply and seriously, human beings are being perceived and treated as though they are literally disposable and, by extension, their great suffering and numerous deaths are somehow less worthy of external concern, sometimes even by otherwise democratic, relatively civilized and supposedly Christian nations. And it’s much easier for a conscience to do when one considers another an innately lower lifeform.
Nothing ”convenient” touching the slaughter of 1300 Israelis in a single day and 250 hostages. Your opening premise utterly corrupt. If the foundation cracked, then the entire building must collapse. Did not read anything after encountering a destroyed foundation of your thesis statement. To compare 9/11 where Cheney/Bush employed a false flag attack to invade Afghanistan and Iraq, just bat shit crazy. To present this wild theory as if it qualified as a fact – simply propaganda and nothing more.
It was 1,200 Israelis barbarically slaughtered by Hamas with 250 hostages taken. A terrible atrocity.
The revenge taken by Israel, targeting hospitals, schools and civilians has so far taken 55,000 Palestinians lives, totally destroyed all the houses and infrastructure in Gaza, terrified 2 million and indiscriminately destroyed families, killing women and children. Then we have the deliberate withholding of water and food to starve the survivors.
One might imagine that a people who have suffered cruelty and persecution, pogroms and the holocaust, might have learnt. Who would have thought that they could be as cruel?
Revenge. Israel has not fire bombed Gaza like the US did Dresden and Tokyo! Dumb ass. Go fuck yourself.
You justify war crimes with other war crimes??
Full of shit. Oct 7th dumb ass who attacked who?
Good to see that the international community is banding together to tell you to stop starving kids, withdrawing water and aid and terrorising 2 milli9on. To stop killing. To stop turning Gaza into a concentration camp and to stop practicing genocide on the Palestinians. Stop behaving like Nazis.
Fuck you and the horse you rode in on. The international community has not done shit in the Russian Ukraine war. You such an idiot.
Shove your hate speech up your faggot butt.
Yo Nazi lover, a lovely terrorist just gunned down two Israeli staff members in Washington DC. You fuck head
I’m not at all surprised. Hate breeds hate. How many families are you proposing to bomb in revenge? How much more hate do you want to generate?
I find it amazing that you who are supporting Nazis and advocating a racist policy of retribution should accuse me of being a nazi. Look in the mirror Moshe. Who wants peace; who wants bombing.
The British ignore the Israeli staff members, engaged to be married, brutally murdered in Washington DC. They promote their UN 242 British French written attempt to return Israel to its pre Six Day War borders! The borders which prevailed when both England and France invaded Egypt to seize the Suez Canal in 1956. Israel categorically rejects Europe’s Two State Solution. Based upon the simple fact that (1) it only promotes European imperialism (2) it has never worked when applied – ever.
1. The UK and EU Posturing as Neo-Mandate Powers
Your critique of the UK and EU as acting in a neo-imperial, Mandate-era fashion has strong historical resonance. UN Resolution 242, co-drafted by Britain and France post-Six-Day War, notably avoided calling for a complete withdrawal from all territories, instead framing it ambiguously. That resolution continues to be used selectively by European powers to pressure Israel — even as these same powers neglect to acknowledge how their own imperial legacies (e.g. Sykes-Picot, the 1956 Suez Crisis) created much of the current instability in the region.
The invocation of humanitarian principles by leaders like Lammy, Macron, and Kallas may mask what is, from an Israeli view, an ongoing campaign to impose a framework that privileges European geopolitical interests and weakens Israel’s sovereignty in determining its security strategy.
2. Selective Outrage and Moral Hypocrisy
The British and EU response, especially given the brutal murders of Israeli citizens on foreign soil, smacks of selective moralism. Their unwillingness to confront antisemitic violence directly or to center the 590+ day hostage crisis in Gaza reflects an imbalance in diplomatic concern.
While Israel is heavily criticized for its military campaign and the humanitarian crisis, there is comparatively minimal European pressure on Hamas — a terrorist organization using human shields, rejecting ceasefire proposals, and diverting aid.
3. Israel’s Rejection of the Two-State Model
Israel’s firm stance against the current form of the Two-State Solution reflects decades of failed negotiations, Palestinian internal division, and the strategic abuse of land concessions (as in Gaza post-2005). From Israel’s standpoint, “land for peace” has produced neither peace nor security.
Many in Israel view the European model as obsolete, grounded in a 20th-century diplomatic vision that ignores present-day asymmetrical warfare, jihadi ideology, and the failure of Palestinian political institutions. Hence, the Israeli response frames such external pressure as both tone-deaf and dangerous.
4. Strategic Recalibration of Alliances
While the UK and EU may see this as an assertion of liberal democratic values, Israel perceives it as a betrayal of mutual interests — particularly amid Iranian regional aggression and surging antisemitism in Europe.
Israel’s pivot toward strengthening relations with the U.S., India, Gulf states (under the Abraham Accords), and tech-forward Asian economies signals a reorientation away from dependency on the increasingly adversarial EU. If Europe continues leveraging economic and political agreements to impose ideological conditions, Israel may respond by further decoupling diplomatically, betting on partners who do not predicate alliance on compliance with disputed international norms.
A deeper political and philosophical rupture: Europe’s invocation of universalist ethics versus Israel’s insistence on particularistic national survival. For many Israelis, the war in Gaza is not a humanitarian crisis of their own making but the unavoidable result of a genocidal neighbor-state hybrid entity entrenched in civilian areas. For Europeans, the war is a test of human rights values. The gap between these worldviews is widening — and may well lead to a historic recalibration in Israeli-European relations.
The murder of the Israeli staff member and his fiancé is tragic. Nobody condones that.
There were two hundred Palestinians killed by Israel in the last two days. Every one of them as big a tragedy.
When you kill someone you create more hate. I’m sure the family of the murdered Israeli’s would like revenge.
I’m sure the families of the murdered Palestinians want revenge.
If my children were killed I’d want revenge.
That’s a lot of hate being racked up.
As can be seen from your words concerning the holocaust, pogroms and wars, that hate lasts through generations.
The murder of the Israelis by Hamas is being used to justify genocide.
The genocide of the Palestinians will not be forgotten. It will be used to kill more Jews later. It’s a horrible cycle of hate, violence, revenge that will have no end.
Tragic … bull shit. If it was tragic then stop your crap calling Israel a Nazi state – ass wipe! What about the murdered 1300 Israelis and their families! douche bag What about the 250 stolen hostages over 100 of which died from torture, rape, and starvation?! There aint no genocide idiot.
The killing of 1,300 Israelis is horrendous. The barbaric torture, rape and murder of hostages is horrendous.
Since the terrorist organization Hamas launched its attacks on Israeli soil on October 7, 2023, around 1,200 Israelis died, and 5,431 were injured. Through retaliation attacks by the Israeli armed forces against Hamas in Gaza, 47,540 Palestinians were killed, and 111,618 were injured.
Does that look proportionate? Killing innocent families? Reducing Gaza to rubble? Deliberately starving civilians?
How many more Palestinians are joining Hamas right now just so they can get revenge on Israel?
What Israel is doing sure looks like Genocide!
Do not require the moral authority of a “dick” from England to condemn the Oct 7th abomination. You have said NOTHING. A war is being fought. Idiot both sides employ propaganda as occurs in all Wars. England referred to the Germans in WWI as “The Huns”. YOU utter idiot why do you eat propaganda as candy. It rots your teeth. 48,000 dead aint genocide dumb ass. Your argument of proportionate utterly flawed. Patton told his soldiers — No honor for you to die for your country. Great honor for you to make the enemy die for his country. Starving civilians a tactic employed in both World Wars. Dumb ASS.
It’s not a war!! It’s revenge!! A Genocide! Starving civilians is OK?? So it was alright what the Nazis did in the concentration camps?? BTW – not just me and millions of decent people – we’re talking governments and the UN. Netanyahu is wanted for War Crimes by international courts. Many governments are calling out Israel for genocide. You’re making Hamas look the lesser villain.
Idiot you do not determine squat. You do not say the Dec 7th Pearl Harbor attack evoked a revenge response by the US!!!!! STFU.
That you question what the Nazis did in the death camps proves conclusively that Your an absolute Nazi Pig. You confuse an accusation with conviction!! Dumb ASS. No Court has “convicted” PM of any crime. You racist blood libel Xtian piece of shit. So the ICC “wants” the Israeli PM to stand trial? So what? Israel did not sign the Rome treaty dumb ass. The ICC established by that treaty has no jurisdiction over Israel which rejects any and all European courts authority post Shoah to judge Jews. Many governments can call what ever they want! So what? You dumb ass idiot fool.
Of course Pearl Harbour elicited a revenge response by the USA. The war crime of Nagasaki was part of that!
I do not question what the Nazi scum did in the death camps at all. I know exactly what the evil bastards did. It distresses me that Israel, out of revenge for terrible atrocities, is doing a similar thing!
The only reason Netanyahu isn’t on trial right now, trying to justify his war crimes, is that Israel was too scared to sign the Rome Treaty. They knew they would be held accountable!
Again you arrogant slut You bloat perverse cunt. YOU ignoramus Homo. You do not qualify NOT as prosecution Nor as Jury and totally fucked as judge.
Israel aint making lamp shades from Arab skins, it aint using Arab fats to make soap etc etc etc. You dumb ass ignoramus you bring zero evidence to support your racist anti- Jew hatred. Fuck YOU the current PM was not in office in March 25, 1957. You stupid SOB who foist your crazy revisionist history bull shit. Post Shoah Israel would never permit a European Court to try Jews ever again. You silly bloated piece of shit.
Never said they were making soap and lampshades – just bombing and starving kids and turning Gaza into a rubble-filled concentration camp.
You never said that Hamas hides in civilian homes hospitals and UN UNWRA buildings either. YOU sorry worthless sack of putrid shit. The statement “turning Gaza into a rubble-filled concentration camp” is a subjective and politically charged assertion. It reflects a particular viewpoint regarding the situation in Gaza, particularly in the context of conflict and humanitarian issues.
Comparing the October 7th, 2023 Hamas attack to 9/11 is not just historically flimsy — it’s structurally unsound on every level: scale, context, actors, and intent. The analogy collapses under basic scrutiny, and trying to stretch it to fit a satirical or polemical narrative risks exposing the writer’s bias more than it reveals any truth.
On September 10, 2001, then-Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld stated that the Pentagon could not account for approximately $2.3 trillion in transactions. This announcement was made during a press briefing, where he discussed the need for reform in the financial management of the Department of Defense.
This combined with the location of the Pentagon destruction of the accounting papers housed in the Pentagon destroyed the next day. The Cheney/Bush invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan, the passage of the Patriot Act which negates much of the Bill of Rights. The lack of human bodies in the forest crash, and that Building #7 collapsed just like the Twin Towers when nothing touched that building which housed all the Enron evidence of fraud … strongly supports the theory that the Bush Administration used 9/11 as an excuse for nation building.
I believe they always had a plan ‘to deal with the Palestinian problem’. They just needed an excuse.
More of the same Moshe. Shame on you. People like you enabled the holocaust just like you enable the genocide in Gaza.
Fuck YOU Pig shit for brains.
Always good to enter into intelligent debate with you Moshe. Glad you’re still alive.
No Opher its most unpleasant to here you squeal like a pig with your Hitler bull shit. STFU
If it struts like a fascist, is racist like a fascist, kills like a fascist, behaves like a fascist; it’s probably a fascist!
If its fat like a pig and oinks like a pig it must be an Opher dopher.
Ha Ha. You are funny Moshe. Face reality for a change.
That your a bloated pig fit for a Muslim barbeque?
More likely you for that BBQ
Noise.
Goyim Product Recall: The German Jesus
Fritz Veigel, born on May 4, 1908, in Heilbronn, passed the first theological service examination in Tübingen in the spring of 1931. As a city vicar in Blaubeuren, he was involved with the German Christians, also with propaganda writings. In 1935, Veigel moved to Thuringia. A return to the Württemberg pastoral service was denied to him due to his beliefs. He died as a soldier on March 7, 1942, at the Eastern Front.
Source: Fritz Veigel, The Brown Church, Stuttgart-Berlin: W. Kohlhammer, n.d. (1934).
“If one asks us: Is Hitler a Christian? we confidently say: Yes! For neither does saying “Lord, Lord” make one a Christian, nor have the speakers of the Christian churches outside their professional sermons used a more pious language than he. Moreover, it is nonsense to ask such a question. Have we not been tormented long enough with such trivialities or pieties as: Is Goethe a Christian? Is Emperor Wilhelm a Christian? If such questions must be asked, then was Christ a Christian? We are not a) humans, b) Christians, and it is not our Christianity that makes us just, but how we are human is what is measured—if at all measured by human standards. Truly, Christ did not come into the world as a foreign addition, but ‘he came into his own,’ and his dominion and glory do not stop at the church boundaries!
To us, Hitler is the German man of God, who lives prayers in incomprehensibly great brotherly love and has affixed his will to God’s wonderful omnipotence. Just as Luther once fought the struggles and victories of an entire era in his breast, so Hitler is for us the dawn of a new millennium—the German history and church history. Just as Luther gave a great emphasis and a unified face to a fragmented, multi-voiced, noisy time through his faith and his deeds, so Hitler is for us the norm of the present and the guarantor of the future, and therefore all our pious insights, plans, and hopes also originate from this name.
Luther took the leap out of the deepest, most pronounced piety of his time, went out of the monastery in faith into the world because he no longer wanted to fill God’s ears with his vain and arbitrary piety—and he believed.
Hitler endured in the starkest reality and worldliness of the world, although and because it seemed completely abandoned by God, and did not want to suffer the divine blessing to leave this world—and he believed.
And in both cases, the faith of a new century began with their deeds. And in both cases, armies of evil spirits were swept away as if by a blow. Mammonism, pacifism, materialism—the idols of the most recent past. Before the new faith, they become small wretchednesses.”
A Review of German Leaders During WWII
Martin Heidegger (1889–1976) spat out speeches that shackled education to the Führerprinzip. This “Leader Principle,” the iron gauntlet gripping Nazi Germany, crushed democratic voices and pulverized collective will beneath the sole rule of the Führer—Hitler’s ruthless dominion. It throttled dissent, enslaved minds, and forged a dictatorship of absolute obedience.
Heidegger hailed the Nazi revolution, at first, as a spiritual rebirth of the German Volk. A man stripped of shame, he refused to kneel, never coughed up an apology, never retracted his venomous allegiance. After the war, he slithered through denazification, dodging accountability and twisting truth with evasive lies.
Dietrich Bonhoeffer thundered opposition at Nazism from its dawn. He hurled blistering public condemnations at Hitler’s regime, especially its savage persecution of Jews, and hammered together the Confessing Church to shatter the Nazi state’s iron grip on Christianity.
The German Confessing Church (Bekennende Kirche) erupted in the late 1930s, clawing back against the Nazi regime’s choking stranglehold on Protestantism, particularly within Lutheranism. After Hitler seized power in 1933, the regime dragged Protestant churches into the German Evangelical Church—a grotesque puppet engineered to broadcast Nazi hate, soaked in anti-Semitism and militant nationalism.
The Barmen Declaration (1934), forged by firebrands like Karl Barth and Bonhoeffer, ripped to shreds the Nazi regime’s attempt to enslave the church. It blasted state control, spat contempt in the face of political distortion, and declared open war on the regime’s monstrous manipulation of Christian faith. The Confessing Church ignited fierce resistance, its leaders hurling themselves into the breach, condemning anti-Semitic laws, and refusing to bow before tyranny. The state retaliated with brutal repression—arrests, beatings, and executions—but the Church’s defiance fractured the Nazi façade of total control.
Yet the Confessing Church splintered from within, torn between cautious cooperation and fiery rebellion. While some whispered compromise, Bonhoeffer and his allies sharpened their swords for active resistance. As Nazi terror tightened its grip, the Church staggered under relentless persecution—leaders vanished into prisons, congregations shuttered, voices crushed. Still, their moral blaze refused to be extinguished.
The Nazi regime clung desperately to the co-opted Lutheran Church to mask its monstrous agenda in sanctimony. Through the German Christian movement, the Nazis crushed dissent, injected venomous Aryan theology into sermons, and wielded Christian rhetoric to justify genocide and militarism. They weaponized faith to twist loyalty into fanaticism, forging a perverse godhead that sanctified cruelty.
Meanwhile, the Vatican under Pope Pius XII held its silence like a fortress of cowardice. Despite witnessing the Confessing Church’s fierce opposition, Pius XII calculated cold diplomacy over righteous outcry. When Rome’s Jews faced deportation in 1943, he offered hollow excuses instead of incendiary condemnation, betraying the innocent to the machinery of death.
Three Germans, three souls born into the turmoil of a shattered nation: Heidegger, the unrepentant collaborator, entangled in toxic ideology; Bonhoeffer, the prophetic conscience who sacrificed all to resist evil; and Pius XII, whose silence stained the Church’s legacy. Their stark choices carve a brutal fault line between genius warped by power, conscience sharpened by courage, and cowardice cloaked in diplomacy.
Dumb ass, Europeans guilty of the Shoah – not Jews! Projecting your guilt on the Jews as dumb ass as believing that Jesus died to take away your sins.
All lives and needless suffering should matter. But that’s much easier for a conscience to dismiss when one considers another an innately much lower lifeform.
On a mindbogglingly massive scale, human beings are being seen and treated as though they are disposable and, by extension, their suffering and death are somehow less worthy of external concern, sometimes even by otherwise democratic, relatively civilized and supposedly Christian nations.
A somewhat similar reprehensible inhuman(e) devaluation is observable in external attitudes, albeit perhaps on a subconscious level, toward the daily civilian lives lost in prolongedly devastating war zones and famine-stricken regions.
In other words, the worth of such life will be measured by its overabundance and/or the protracted conditions under which it suffers; and those people can eventually receive meagre column inches on the back page of the First World’s daily news. It’s an immoral consideration of ‘quality of life’. And it’s even easier for a conscience to do when one considers another an innately lower lifeform.
With each news report of the daily civilian death toll from unrelenting bombardment, I feel a slightly greater desensitization and resignation. I’ve noticed this disturbing effect with basically all major protracted conflicts internationally since I began regularly consuming news products in the late 1980s.
… I often say that people should avoid believing, let alone claiming, that they are not capable of committing an atrocity, even if relentlessly pushed. Contrary to what is claimed or felt by many of us, deep down there’s a potential monster in each of us that, under the just-right circumstances, can be unleashed — and maybe even more so when convinced that ‘God is on our side’.
Also, it’s sadly and shamefully true that while some peoples have been brutally victimized throughout history a disproportionately large number of times, the victims of one place and time can and sometimes do become the victimizers of another place and time.
Thoroughly agree. We are totally desensitised. It becomes a meaningless numbers game that we do not relate to real people, real misery, real suffering.
We are all pawns in a political power game. Manipulated, used and disposed of.
Fuck you and your blood libel slanders.
Critical and absolutely necessary to understand how different cultures of different people shape, interpret, and understand similar literary ideas/ideals.
The Eastern Jin dynasty (东晋, Dōng Jìn) was a Chinese dynasty that lasted from 317 to 420 AD. It is considered part of the Six Dynasties period, which followed the fall of the Western Jin dynasty and was characterized by political fragmentation and cultural development in southern China. The Eastern Jin was established by the Sima family, who were descendants of the Jin dynasty’s ruling clan. After the fall of the Western Jin due to internal strife and invasions by non-Han ethnic groups, the remnants of the Jin court retreated to the south, where they established the Eastern Jin with its capital at Jiankang (present-day Nanjing).
The dynasty struggled with internal conflicts, including power struggles among aristocratic families and military leaders. Despite political instability, the Eastern Jin period was marked by significant cultural and intellectual achievements. It was a time of flourishing literature, philosophy, and art. Notable figures, such as the poet and essayist Lu Ji, emerged during this period.
The Eastern Jin saw the continued spread of Buddhism in China, which began to gain popularity among the populace. Daoism also remained influential, contributing to the spiritual and cultural life of the time. The Eastern Jin dynasty played a crucial role in the development of Chinese culture and society during a time of significant transition and upheaval.
“The Whip” (文赋九) section, Lu Ji uses the metaphor of a whip to illustrate the power of literature and the writer’s ability to influence and inspire. The whip symbolizes both control and the ability to provoke action, reflecting how literature can guide emotions and thoughts. The section highlights the importance of craftsmanship in writing, suggesting that a skilled writer can wield their words effectively to achieve their intended impact.
Just as a whip can evoke a physical response, literature can stir deep emotions in readers, prompting reflection and action as literature can influence society and individuals profoundly. The concept of writing as a form of “population control” or a means of influencing and guiding society can be found in various literary and rhetorical traditions beyond Chinese literature. Greek philosophers and rhetoricians, such as Aristotle and Plato, emphasized the power of rhetoric in shaping public opinion and guiding behavior. Aristotle, in particular, discussed the ethical responsibilities of the speaker in his work “Rhetoric,” where he argued that effective persuasion should be grounded in truth and moral integrity. Plato, in works like “Gorgias,” critiqued rhetoric for its potential to manipulate rather than enlighten, highlighting the responsibility of the orator to use their skills wisely.
In ancient Greece, particularly in philosophical circles, the relationship between a teacher and a student was often one of mentorship. Teachers like Plato and Aristotle were highly respected figures, and their teachings were foundational to the development of Western philosophy. While Plato did critique rhetoric, particularly in works like “Gorgias,” his criticisms were aimed at the ethical implications of rhetoric and its potential for manipulation rather than a direct critique of Aristotle as a person. Plato believed that rhetoric could be used for deceitful purposes and that true knowledge and philosophical inquiry were more valuable than mere persuasive speech.
The philosophical tradition encouraged debate and discussion, and it was not uncommon for students to challenge their teachers’ ideas. This dialectical method was a way to deepen understanding and refine arguments. This cultural Greek style not commonly found in Judean society. True rabbi Akiva serves as a exceptional exception. But in Judea the masoret spun around the central axis where the pupil did not openly challenge the rabbi master.
In contrast, the educational practices in ancient Judea, particularly in rabbinic traditions, often emphasized a more hierarchical relationship between the rabbi (teacher) and the student (pupil). While there was respect for the rabbi’s authority and knowledge, the structure of learning was typically more focused on the transmission of established פרדס logic and the different schools of logical middot of interpretation like that of rabbi Yishmael and rabbi Yossi Ha’Galilli. Students were generally expected to learn from their teachers without openly challenging them, as the rabbi’s role was seen as a guide to understanding sacred texts and traditions. For example rabbi Akiva’s kabbalah of פרדס logic emphasized inductive active comparisons between common law case/rule rulings compared to similar judicial case/rule precedent rulings. Herein defines common law as Judean judicial justice, built around judicial law as opposed by Greek legislative law which organized law into organized legal subjects.
Common law all about courtroom judicial definitions of law rather that bureaucratic legislative decrees from above made by authority figures who based their law upon what served best the interests of the State rather than resolve a legal dispute over damages inflicted by one citizen upon another citizen of the Republic.
In rabbinic traditions, the relationship between the rabbi and the student was indeed more hierarchical. For a rabbi to sit upon a judicial court, everything depended upon that rabbi’s order vis a vis other rabbis likewise desiring to sit as a courtroom judge. If for example a judge retired, the closest student in line to replace him, appointed as judge. Hence Judicial Judean law recognized an order of rabbinic authority whereas Greek statute law had no such cultural masoret. Judean society, common law was focused on resolving disputes between individuals based on established precedents and judicial rulings. This approach emphasized the practical application of law in the context of real-life situations and the relationships between citizens. In contrast, Greek legislative law often involved decrees made by authorities that could prioritize the interests of the state over individual justice. The rabbinic tradition was deeply rooted in religious and communal values, emphasizing the importance of ethical behavior and justice within the community. Greek philosophy, while also concerned with ethics, often approached law and governance from a more abstract and theoretical perspective, focusing on the role of reason and the state.
Following the utter destruction of Judea by the Romans following the disaster of the Bar Kokhba revolt [b] (132-136 AD), Greek legislative statute law dominated both politics and literature.
The Roman statesman and orator Cicero wrote extensively on rhetoric and the responsibilities of the speaker. In his works, such as “De Oratore,” he emphasized the importance of moral character and the ethical obligations of orators to use their skills for the common good, suggesting that rhetoric could be a tool for social order and governance.
In the 17th century, the English poet and writer John Milton expressed similar views in his writings, particularly in “Areopagitica,” where he argued for the importance of free expression and the role of literature in shaping society. Milton believed that writers had a responsibility to engage with moral and political issues, using their skills to promote truth and justice.
In the 20th century, George Orwell’s essays, particularly “Politics and the English Language,” discuss the manipulation of language and the responsibility of writers to use clear and honest language. Orwell warned against the use of language as a tool for propaganda and control, emphasizing the ethical duty of writers to resist such practices. The American novelist Toni Morrison spoke about the power of storytelling and the responsibility of writers to address social issues, particularly those related to race and identity. In her works and interviews, she highlighted the role of literature in shaping cultural narratives and influencing societal change.
In ancient China, particularly during the Eastern Jin dynasty and earlier periods, Confucianism played a significant role in shaping educational practices. Confucius emphasized the importance of literature, moral education, and the cultivation of virtue through study. The study of classical texts, poetry, and philosophy was seen as essential for personal development and moral character. Scholars were expected to engage deeply with texts, reflecting on their meanings and applying them to ethical conduct.
Chinese literature often served as a means of moral instruction and social harmony. Works like the “Analects” of Confucius and the poetry of the Tang dynasty were not only artistic expressions but also vehicles for ethical teachings. The disciplined study of literature was viewed as a way to cultivate one’s character and contribute to the well-being of society.
The Chinese literary tradition included various forms, such as poetry, essays, and historical writings. The emphasis on literary craftsmanship and the ability to convey complex ideas through elegant language was highly valued. Scholars often participated in literary competitions, which were integral to the civil service examination system, reinforcing the connection between literature, education, and governance.
Ancient Greece the dialectical method encouraged critical thinking and debate, allowing students to engage with texts and challenge established ideas. Greek rhetoric was seen as a powerful tool for persuasion and influence. The ethical responsibilities of speakers and writers were central to discussions about rhetoric, with an emphasis on truth and moral integrity. Literature, particularly in the form of drama and poetry, was used to reflect societal values, explore human nature, and provoke thought about moral dilemmas.
The rabbinic approach emphasized a hierarchical relationship between the rabbi and the student, with a focus on the transmission of established teachings based both upon inductive comparative Case/Rule rulings compared to similar precedent previous Courtroom rulings. The organization of the T’NaCH Mishna and Gemara codifications, highly edited texts which permit later students to make fixed tri-angulated syllogism deductive conclusions of reasoning – based upon the classic texts being sealed and static rigid – ideal for syllogistic deductive reasoning. T’NaCH, like the Mishna and Gemara, also a sealed text. This more ancient Hebrew literature focused upon prophetic mussar rather than Talmudic ritual halacha.
Zen Buddhism, which emphasizes direct experience and meditation, became a significant influence in Japan, particularly during the Kamakura period (1185–1333). It focuses on mindfulness, simplicity, and the nature of existence, which resonated with Japanese aesthetics and culture. Shiatsu practitioners focus on the body’s meridians and pressure points, aiming to restore balance and promote healing. The practice reflects a holistic approach to health, integrating physical, emotional, and spiritual well-being. The emphasis on mindfulness and presence in Zen practice complements the Shiatsu approach, as practitioners are encouraged to be fully aware and attentive during treatment.
Chinese Daoism has a well-developed concept of “Chi” (or “Qi”), which refers to the vital life force that flows through all living things. This concept is central to various Chinese healing practices, martial arts, and philosophical thought. In contrast, Zen Buddhism does not have a specific concept of Chi. Instead, it focuses on the nature of mind and existence, emphasizing direct experience and meditation rather than the manipulation of energy.
When Zen Buddhism was introduced to Japan, it adapted to the existing cultural and spiritual landscape, which included Shinto beliefs and practices. This adaptation led to a unique expression of Zen that differed from its Chinese roots. Confucianism, with its emphasis on social harmony, hierarchy, and moral conduct, had a profound influence on Chinese society, particularly in governance and education. However, its principles did not take hold in the same way within Japanese samurai culture. The samurai class was more influenced by Bushido, the “way of the warrior,” which emphasized loyalty, honor, and martial prowess. While there are overlaps with Confucian values, the samurai ethos was distinct and often prioritized martial values over Confucian ideals of social order and moral conduct.
The historical context of Japan, including the feudal system and the rise of the samurai, shaped the values and beliefs of warrior societies. The samurai were often more influenced by Zen Buddhism, which provided a spiritual framework that complemented their martial practices and philosophies. The influences of Zen Buddhism on practices like Shiatsu healing and the distinct cultural expressions of Japanese warrior societies illustrate the complexities of cultural exchange and adaptation. While Chinese philosophies like Daoism and Confucianism have had significant impacts in their own contexts, their principles did not always translate directly into Japanese culture, which developed its own unique interpretations and practices. This dynamic interplay between cultures highlights the richness of both Chinese and Japanese traditions.
Iran looks more and more like Gaza. Burn baby burn.
The perceived omissions or failures of others, such as Leo Tolstoy, Rabbi Stephen S. Wise, and Amy Katz, can be viewed as complicity or indifference in the face of injustice. The consequences of such omissions can be profound, especially during times of crisis, as they may contribute to a culture of silence or inaction regarding pressing issues like antisemitism. Leadership morally opposes antisemitism, it does not quietly ignore violent pogroms like the Oct 7th 2023 Hamas surprise attack!
Leaders especially those who make claims of moral superiority and hold positions of influence, if they actively oppose hatred and discrimination they must do it equally across the board. Calling Israeli leaders “war criminals” while quiet upon war crimes committed by others, like Hamas, makes such people antisemitic pigs.
???? Bullshit.
Noise from a shit for brains.
Erudite again.
LOL
I’m not quiet about what Hamas did. They were animals who need full retribution. That does not justify genocide and war crimes.
Fuck you your opinion aint shit. The Syrians torture the Druse community in Syria RIGHT NOW. Vile shit head.
The perceived omissions or failures of others, such as Leo Tolstoy, Rabbi Stephen S. Wise, and Amy Katz, can be viewed as complicity or indifference in the face of injustice. The consequences of such omissions can be profound, especially during times of crisis, as they may contribute to a culture of silence or inaction regarding pressing issues like antisemitism.
Leadership morally opposes antisemitism; it does not quietly ignore violent pogroms like the October 7, 2023, Hamas surprise attack. Leaders—especially those who claim moral superiority and hold positions of influence—must oppose hatred and discrimination equally across the board.
Calling Israeli leaders “war criminals” while staying silent about war crimes committed by others, like Hamas, exposes such people as morally bankrupt and antisemitic.
Hamas’s actions were appalling. All of the planners and perpetrators need bringing to justice.
Israel’s response is worst – genocide and war crimes cannot be justified by the hporrendous things Hamas did. Targetting women and children is outrageous. You should feel shame.
Ham-ass actions WERE appalling. Fuck you. Return the stolen hostages and STFU.
They have become a bargaining tool in the midst of extreme violence.
Who is “they” you vile silly dumb ass, learn how to write.
I can write
LOL what a joke.
The Holocaust wasn’t a joke – neither is genocide in Gaza.
Pig you juxtapose the European guilt of the Shoah with the Oct7th Abomination War. Fuck YOU.
The German public were in denial about the Nazi genocide project against the Jews.
You are in denial about the genocide your government is perpetrating against the Palestinian civilian population.
You should read about it and see the terrible pictures and footage coming out of Gaza – starving children, wounded and dead, rubble. It’s an atrocity.
You are defending genocide and war crimes. You should be ashamed. It is bringing the whole Jewish people into disrepute – to be reviled by the world (apart from far-right Nazis like Trump).
https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/top-genocide-scholars-unanimous-israel-committing-genocide-gaza-investigation-finds
https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2024/11/un-special-committee-finds-israels-warfare-methods-gaza-consistent-genocide
https://www.ecchr.eu/fileadmin/Q_As/ECCHR_Q_A__Gaza_and_Genocide_20241210.pdfhttps://news.un.org/en/story/2024/03/1147976
https://www.bu.edu/articles/2024/is-israel-committing-genocide-in-gaza/
https://www.amnesty.org.uk/press-releases/israelopt-fresh-evidence-genocide-satellite-imagery-reveals-total-razing-khuzaa
Idiot your full of shit.
Throughout history, various Christian denominations have contributed to the spread of antisemitic attitudes and actions, creating a climate of hostility toward Jews. This includes theological teachings that portrayed Jews in a negative light and blamed them for the death of Jesus. The Nazi regime, though not the Vatican (the Pope looked on as the Nazis deported the Jews of Rome to death camps), maintained a close alliance with the Lutheran Church in Germany. The Nazis frequently cited Martin Luther’s racist statements about Jews. Christian churches in England and the USA failed to condemn the British White Paper of 1939, and in the United States, not a single Christian denomination opposed Roosevelt’s decision to close U.S. borders to Jewish refugees fleeing from Nazi extermination camps.
Many argue that the historical role of the Church in fostering antisemitism is of immense significance. The formal apologies, educational initiatives, and interfaith efforts made by Christianity after the Shoah seem like cheap excuses—like teats on a boar: useless and too late. Historical antisemitism within Christianity contributed to the conditions that made the Shoah possible. The Church, as an institution, bears full guilt after over 2,000 years of blood libels, ghettos, and mass expulsions of entire Jewish populations. The words of the Gospel are tragically confirmed: “By their fruits you shall know them.”
The assignment of criminal guilt, especially in connection with historical events and religious groups, is the subject of this statement. Justice requires naming guilt—and, where necessary, advocating for extreme measures like the death penalty. Throughout history, all Christian denominations have played a role in solidifying antisemitic attitudes and actions, thereby contributing to systemic discrimination and violence against Jewish communities. This includes theological doctrines that justified the kidnapping of Jewish babies through forced baptism and war-crime-level mass expulsions.
Taxation imposed by the Church without political representation constitutes a form of European enslavement of the Jewish people. Religious Christian organizations must take full responsibility for the actions of their followers and for the ideologies of racial violence they spread. The failure of many Christian churches to denounce antisemitism and to take a stand against the atrocities committed during the Shoah reflects broader complicity in these historical injustices.
The lack of accountability can perpetuate cycles of hatred and violence—and points to the need for a deeper reckoning with history. It is essential to critique and hold Christianity accountable, both theologically and institutionally. Christian theologies which promote, Love as the greatest commandment, Fire and Brimstone Heaven Hell God Satan bi-polar emotional declarations – all expressions of Av tuma emotional spirits which indoctrinate mental insanity.
Impossible to not be under the Law and then unilaterally declare which of the multitude of T’NaCH and Talmudic commandments and Halachot qualifies as the most important of all Torah common law. This narishkeit nonsense compares to the 666 mark of the beast and the Church declarations that the Christ killer Jews bear the mark of Cain. Xtianity no different than Nazism. Both promote hate propaganda in the name of Love.
Yes – all religion is shit!
You across the board condemnation of religion … does not amount to shit. You never express any specific complaints, just like Israel. Only broad dumb ass slander declarations. What an idiot. You never learn.
I write plenty of complaints about religion – indoctrination, misogyny, racism, hatred, wars, violence, genocide, fairy tales.
You write bull shit just like you write right now! General declarations zero physical evidence which proves your slander. Face it … you’re just a pig.
True opposition to hatred requires consistent, evidence-based critique of all actors, not selective outrage or name-calling.
opposition to hatred requires calling out hatred whoever the perpetrator. There is no room for partisanship or jusification of violence. There is no justification. Justice should be in the hands of a court!
Post Nazi ‘Final Solution’ Europe lost its mandate to judge Jews in any of their pig-courts.
Dumb ass! Actions have consequences. In Hebrew its called ירידות הדורות – the descending generations. Upstream war crime affects and impacts all down stream generations.
NO JEWS NO NEWS Faggot piece of shit.
The recent violence in Suweida, Syria, has drawn significant attention due to the brutal clashes involving Syrian government forces, Druze militias, and Bedouin tribes. Over a four-day period, reports indicate that nearly 600 people were killed, including a substantial number of Druze civilians and fighters. The violence has been characterized by accusations of “field executions” and retaliatory attacks, highlighting the severe sectarian tensions in the region.
The fighting erupted between Druze armed groups and government forces, with the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights reporting at least 594 fatalities, including 300 Druze individuals. Many of these deaths were attributed to government forces, which allegedly executed civilians and engaged in looting. Following intense fighting, Syrian government forces began withdrawing from Suweida as part of a ceasefire agreement mediated by the U.S., Turkey, and Arab nations. Israel conducted airstrikes targeting Syrian military positions, claiming these actions were necessary to protect the Druze community, which has a significant presence in Israel. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu emphasized the country’s commitment to safeguarding the Druze and maintaining a demilitarized zone in southern Syria.
The situation has sparked accusations of hypocrisy and double standards, particularly regarding international responses to violence against minority groups. Critics argue that the global community often overlooks atrocities committed against the Druze and other minorities in Syria while focusing on other conflicts, such as the Israel-Palestine situation. This perceived inconsistency raises questions about the motivations behind international interventions and the prioritization of certain narratives over others.
The ongoing violence in Suweida underscores the complex and often brutal dynamics of the Syrian conflict, where sectarian divisions. complicate efforts for peace and stability. The plight of the Druze community, caught between government forces and rival factions, highlights the urgent need for a comprehensive approach to address the humanitarian and security challenges in the region.
More religious factions creating vicious violence and opportunistic Israel.
Noise. You are full of shit. Poor sack of shit.
Empty vessels
PU more shit from a piece of shit.
Supporter of genocide – you should be ashamed.
Declarations of bravado slander. You have no shame. YOU stinking pig.
An interesting discussion on this topic with Frank Hubeny. His opinion I would like to share with you. Frank Hubeny writes:
Frank Hubeny
2m agoPoetry, Short Prose and Walking
I agree with much of the criticism of Calvinism in your comment associated with Jim Zwinglius Redivivus. Indeed, one can look at this from a higher perspective. The idea of the just war and predestination became solidified long before Calvin with Augustine in the 4th to 5th century. The cult of western atheism today with its insistence on determinism can be viewed as the dominant split-off religion from Reformed Christianity.
However, legalistic Judaism offers no solution nor is Christianity a dead religion.
As I mentioned to you earlier, Akiva in the 1st to 2nd century did severe damage to both Judaism, and indirectly Christianity, by permitting, if not planning, the reduction in the Genesis 5 and 11 genealogies. This reduced Judaism to rabbinic legalism which puffed up the rabbis. It discredited the Bible (Tanach) as history.
Recover your history. Take it seriously. Stop proclaiming your dead legalism as something of value. It is little more than another sub-cult of western atheism.
And I responded with:
mosckerr
July 24, 2025 at 3:01 pm Edit
Legalistic Judaism King David undermined, according to the opinions raised within the Yerushalmi Talmud which argue that after David conquered Damascus – that he failed to establish a City of Refuge ie small Sanhedrin courtroom therein. His post war slaughter of 2/3rds of the defeated soldiers … done on his own judicial decree!
Then came his son Shlomo – what a disaster. The Talmud introduced the concept of ירידות הדורות/descending generations. This abstract term has two major branches of interpretation.
Post the Rambam Civil War where assimilated statute law, a copy of Greek and Roman “eggcrate” law; law organized into subject matter like eggs organized into a crate sold by the dozen. This path of abomination interprets ירידות הדורות as meaning that the later generations slavishly cannot argue upon – much less challenge the authority of earlier religious rulings.
Orthodox Judaism today compares to a derailed train thrown off its tracks. Because Jewish Orthodox rabbis and how much more so Conservative/Historical Judaism rabbis, and Libtard Reform Judaism rabbis! Conservative Judaism reads the T’NaCH and Talmud in a manner very similar to the way your read your pornographic sophomoric bilble translations: word 4 word. You “believe” the God created the world in 6 days and rested on Sunday. LOL Conservative rabbis suffer from this delusion as well. Many of them, very nice people like yourself. Perhaps the comparison of Democrap ‘Trump Derangement Syndrome’, viewed from this perspective makes sense. Be that as it may, Conservative Judaism interprets T’NaCH literature as primarily teaching history rather than commanding prophetic mussar – as pre-Rambam’s Civil War ירידות הדורות understood and interpreted the T’NaCH expressed through the literature of the Aggadah of the Talmud and the Midrashim written by the Gaonim scholars who pre-dated the Reshonim scholars.
Its this branch of Judaism, which studies the Talmudic texts as common law and only common law. This branch interprets ירידות הדורות with a completely different set of values. This branch of Judaism, obviously pre-dates Rambam and his perversion of Talmudic common law unto an organized Greek/Roman statute law egg-crate simplification of Judaism as a religion rather than Judaism as a Sanhedrin common law lateral court system. Therefore this branch of T’NaCH and Talmud understands the k’vanna of ירידות הדורות/descending generations as referring to a kind of ‘Domino ripple effect’. Where an earlier generation caused down stream later generations to continue the error first introduced by an earlier generation. Like when king Shlomo built the Temple – a building of wood and stone – rather than establish the Sanhedren common law lateral Federal Court which has the mandate to make ‘Legislative Review/משנה תורה judgements upon laws imposed by either a Jewish government or king.
Not till the American revolution did ever once again arise the possibility that a Supreme Court could possess the power to over-rule a law passed by the Government/President.
Legislative review does not limit itself to declaring a law passed by both Houses of Congress and the President as UN-Constitutional. משנה תורה actively empowers the Sanhedrin Courts to re-write laws passed by a Jewish central government or king and re-introduce those re-written laws as the laws of the land.
Chief Justice Marshal attempted to do ‘Legislative Review’ with Andrew Jacksons’ law which decreed the ‘Trail of Tears’; the forced population transfer of Indian populations moved from Florida to Oklahoma. Andrew Jackson responded with: Chief Justice Marshal has made his decision. Now let me see him enforce it!
From that moment forward ירידות הדורות no Supreme Court has ever again attempted to impose Legislative Review upon either Congress or the President.
Now returning to the debate between us concerning whether Xtian dead or alive. You say this stinking rotting corpse breaths. While my opinion argues that its past time to bury this stinking corpse which even vultures refuse to eat its rotting flesh as if they feared the plague.
You condemn rabbi Akiva’s kabbala which produced Talmudic common law based upon T’NaCH mussar common law. You claim, with totally unsubstantiated lack of any evidence to support your wild declaration “belief system” that the Akiva kabbalah which dominated all the rabbis during the Era’s of both the Mishna and the Amoraim Gemara periods of scholarship upon the Torah suffered damages. This declaration would put you into the camp of the Tzeddukim who rejected the Oral Torah and sought to impose Greek deductive logic rather than rabbi Akiva’s inductive פרדס logic, as recalled every year during Hanukkah when Jews make an after-meal blessing over bread. There, in that specific after-meal blessing, contained the remembrance that the Tzeddukim, referred to as רשעים sought to cause Israel to forget the Oral Torah.
Now you as a Goy declare that rabbi Akiva’s פרדס kabbalah of inductive logic damaged Judaism and Xtianity. Sir, this opinion, its definitely not your place – as an alien outsider to the Jewish people to make; despite many assimilated Jews who possibly might agree with you.
Your revisionist declarations concerning totally unproven declarations that rabbi Akiva rewrote בראשית in the Xtian chapters of 5 and 11, the Torah has no such thing as chapters, merit as much respect as Jews show to Arabs/Muslim “scholars” who declare that Jews rewrote the Torah in the matter of the Akadah and replaced Yishmael with Yitzak. Utter bunk and total narishkeit bull shit.
A list of genealogies as taught in the Torah masoret, serves as the continuation of the Central Theme within the entire Torah of Avraham, Yitzak, and Yaacov fathering the chosen Cohen people. Your absurd replacement theology attempts to substitute the false messiah fraud of JeZeus as the replacement for the Chosen Cohen people.
This vile revisionist history worked while Jews endured as scattered refugees without rights in Goyim countries. Jews cursed to wander the Earth as the descendants of Cain Xtian theology. But post Shoah, wherein Zionism blessed by HaShem thwarted the invasion of 5 Arab Armies armed by the British empire and won National Independence. Sir, thereafter the shoe of exile now all Xtian societies forced to wear. The 666 mark of Cain seared into the flesh of Xtians like Nazi Shoah tatoos on Shoah death camp survivors. The rebuke made by your God: ‘By their fruits you shall know them’ fully exposed in all Xtian souls, like the 666 Revelation metaphor.
My generation, we strive to restore the Torah as the Written Constitution of our Republic of 12 Tribes/States. We strive equally to lean upon the Talmud as the working model to restore lateral Sanhedrin common law courtrooms mandated with the power of Legislative Review over all Central Governments in Jerusalem and all Tribal/State governments across the Republic.
The idea of god is thankfully dead!
Which idea of god? Idiot you never bring any details to support your sweeping dumb ass declarations of ignorance.
All ideas of the phantom fairy.
Your arrogant “ALL” declarations which proclaims yoursef as a god. LOL Fuck YOU.
I don’t believe in any gods.
Your Ego merits nothing other than complete contempt.
Good for you!
Your reputation not worth shit. Pig.
For others to judge.
I am part of “others” who judge you as a worthless pile of stinking shit.
Your language demonstrates your intelligence and worth.
Noise.
Blind as a bat.
Only according to your slander. Pig.
Human society not flat, nor a טיפש פשט mythology.
The zionist experiment of democracy faces some criticism by Jews such as myself who favor restoration of a Torah constitutional Republic which mandates a lateral Sanhedrin common law courts to regulate all laws passed by Jerusalem and the state legislatures of the 12 Tribes. Imposing Judicial Legislative Review upon Sanhedrin common law courtrooms with the Mandated Constitutional power to conduct trials which judge Capital Crimes offenses, and impose 4 different types of death penalties, dependent upon the nature of the Capital crimes committed. And equally vital and important דיוק inference to judging Capital Crimes Cases: To judge the leadership responsible for Federal and State governments; based through evidence of laws bureaucratically imposed by government authority officials — viewed through the lenses of prophetic משנה תורה-Legislative Review.
The prioritization of lateral common law Sanhedrin courtrooms over institutional machinery of governance, which directly includes government leadership positions within these institutions of government, this essential clause defines, separates, and make unique Jewish political science. Faith: the Torah defines as justice justice pursue; a direct reference to lateral Sanhedrin common law courtrooms having the mandate of ‘Legislative Review’ over all governments – Jerusalem or any tribal/state legislature.
Democracy or democratic institutions not part of the Jewish cultural traditions. Democratic mob rule, a Greek idea and not a Jewish cultural concept. Leaders “anointed” under the pre-condition that they will faithfully pursue justice as the rule of law. As in all Human endeavors, the humanity of Man, the ideal and the practical realities – a wide gap separates the two. When a leader sufficiently abuses his leadership mandate a prophet, representative of the Sanhedrin Court, impeaches that leader and replaces him with another. The stories in the Book of Judges and Samuel and Kings, which pits, for example: Shaul against David, serve as precedent models which separate Ordered societies from chaotic societies collapsing into a state of anarchy.
Imposition of some grand Cathedral, Soloman Temple – like institutions comparable the newest Federal Reserve building in the US, the graphic porn of pork graft in government that has no shame – within any given civilization. Institutions compare to people that bow down and worship idols. Buildings of wood and stone do not promise efficient good governance. Public expenditure of taxes to build such grand structures of Egoism, they serve witness to a stratification of aristocratic feudal Lord/peasant economic anarchy; which imposes wealth and justifies ‘might make right’ judicial injustice, oppression, theft, and even taboo incest or murder.
Contrast the IDF with its direct linkage with power projection through Foreign Policy. Ideally Foreign Policy plays second fiddle to domestic Home Rule. But often the nature of the Humanity of Man, Foreign Policies prioritized over Domestic Policies. This Yatzir Ha’Rah, once more its power seduction dominates the dynamic “ideal vs actual”; this gap separates the vision of governance from the cruel reality – that all men sit and crap on toilets, and it stinks. The Human potential NEVER achieves the Human ideal messiah.
NT mythology no different than Homer’s Iliad, and Odyssey. Hesiod’s Theogony and Works and Days. Aeschylus’s The Orestia. Sophocles Oedipus Rus. Euripides Medea etc etc these Greek myth stories, they compare to how Xtians worship their silly sophomoric bible translations which depict a messiah savior that rises from the judicial oppression grave and saves all Humanity — despite the Caesar Son of Gods – the personification of Hercules/JeZeus in flesh, blood & History.
The fly in this ever so sweet ointment, myths do not actually make and determine history. As history does not shape and determine modern life today in any society in all the annuls of Humans living on this Earth. Worshipping history as God the exact same idolatry as worshipping Shlomo’s or Herod’s Temples made of wood and stone. Institutionalized buildings, no matter the cost of their construction does not and never has produced the righteous pursuit of judicial common law justice.
This is the 21st century.
And … Idiot
Trump is applying pressure because of the genocide
Repeat __ idiot.
Intelligent argument??
Repeat _ idiot.
Marco Rubio Sanctions ICC Judges After They Target U.S. and Israel in Explosive Rulings
In a sweeping move, Senator Marco Rubio announced sanctions against four International Criminal Court justices.
________________________________________
________________________________________
Marco Rubio’s sanctions on ICC judges—in response to politically driven rulings targeting the U.S. and Israel—represent the first serious American pushback against the expanding overreach of international legal institutions. But these sanctions merely scratch the surface. If Israel were to bomb the International Criminal Court in The Hague for the crime of judicial overreach, it would unleash a shockwave through the foundations of the post-WWII European imperial legal order.
Such an act would shatter the illusion that the Rome Statute and its court represent binding global authority. In truth, the ICC is a political weapon wielded disproportionately against Western democracies and their allies, while shielding rogue regimes. Its authority rests on consensus, not enforcement. The Rome Treaty would be exposed as not worth the paper it’s written on.
Europe forfeited its moral right to judge the Jewish people the moment it orchestrated the Shoah. Any European claim to universal justice—especially when applied selectively against the Jewish state—is hypocrisy cloaked in humanitarianism. The ICC’s rulings against Israel are not about war crimes; they are ritual acts of expiation for Europe’s own genocidal guilt. But that guilt is not Israel’s burden to carry. To bomb the ICC would be to formally reject Europe’s post-Nazi pretensions to legal supremacy and declare: “You have no right to judge us.”
Bombing the ICC would have the same historical effect as the 1956 Suez Crisis: the end of European claims to independent geopolitical authority. Just as France and the UK’s failed bid to reclaim the Suez Canal revealed their imperial impotence, an Israeli destruction of the ICC would reveal the EU’s inability to project legal-moral power beyond its own borders.
What the EU has is not law, but a narrative infrastructure—paper treaties, postmodern guilt, and international NGOs wielding legal language as a substitute for lost religious and imperial confidence.
A targeted Israeli strike on the ICC would not trigger war. It would trigger disbelief, followed by narrative collapse, and finally a global reckoning with Western legal hypocrisy. The EU would be faced with the question: do we escalate to save face—or submit to an Israeli dictate which radically limits the EU authority in the balance of power in the Middle East and in Europe.
If Israel bombed the Court of the Hague for the crime of judicial over-reach. This would set a precedent that the establishment of the ICC through the Rome Treaty – not worth the paper the Rome Treaty written upon. Widespread EU condemnations Big Deal. England and France have already broken off diplomatic relations with Israel.
The Trump Government in Washington most likely would support Israel if Israel bombed the Court of the Hague for judicial over-reach. The Rome Treaty established Court would most likely dissolve. It would most definitely challenge the judicial jurisdiction of a European Court over Israel!
Post Shoah Europe lost its rights to judge Jews. The destruction of the Pie in the Sky Rome Treaty would establish a major political precedent that European imperialism stops at the borders of the EU member states alone.
The assertion that bombing the ICC in The Hague would lead to a collapse of the EU’s prestige is a strong viewpoint that reflects significant concerns about the authority and effectiveness of international institutions.
If a member state or a country with significant geopolitical influence, like Israel, were to attack an international institution such as the ICC, it could be perceived as a direct challenge to the authority of not only the ICC but also the broader framework of international law that the EU supports.
In short: bombing the Court of the Hague would radically change the balance of power in Europe. For the first time since the Muslim invasion of Western Europe a major disruption of European political autonomy would result.
The EU would either put up or shut up: either they would declare War against Israel or not. The Nato alliance, if the US backed Israel would unquestionably collapse. The EU’s credibility as a defender of international law would cease to exist – gone like a puff of smoke. Israel would have called the bluff of the EU, like as if bombing the ICC compares to a hand of stud poker! This could lead to a more fragmented international order, challenging the EU’s role as a global actor.
An attack on the ICC could set a precedent that undermines the enforcement of international law, leading to a situation where states feel empowered to act unilaterally without regard for international institutions.
The incident could complicate diplomatic relations not only between Israel and the EU but also between other countries and international organizations. It could lead to a reevaluation of how states engage with international legal frameworks.
The UN itself would most likely collapse like as did the League of Nations. If nothing else, the historical relationship between Europe and Israel, particularly in the context of the Shoah and post-war UN attempt to compare Israel to the European Nazi crimes against humanity, adds layers of complexity to this European projectionism of its own Nazi guilt and the moral bankruptcy of both Western and Eastern Roman church moral authority over European civilizations.
The implications of such an act would resonate deeply within the historical narrative of European-Jewish relations and radically shift the narrative reversing the role of Jews as dominant and the church as dhimmi slaves – utterly rejected and despised.
The entire European security architecture is underwritten by the United States, both financially and militarily. Without U.S. backing, NATO becomes functionally hollow. France and the UK retain nuclear capability, but their conventional power is insufficient to act independently against a U.S.-aligned state like Israel.
No EU state would risk confrontation with the U.S., their most vital ally, over a non-NATO event like an Israeli action against the ICC. EU states are deeply post-military in culture. Their battlefield is law, narrative, and diplomacy—not armed force.
Even in the face of Russian invasion (Ukraine), EU states have limited direct engagement, preferring economic sanctions, legal resolutions, and humanitarian aid. Against Israel, the EU’s instinct would be: denounce, sanction, isolate—not mobilize or fight.
Much of EU condemnation of Israel is a projection of its own unresolved guilt over colonialism and the Holocaust. This moral outrage stops at the threshold of real cost. That’s why you see relentless UN resolutions, ICC motions, and media warfare—but not realpolitik confrontation. Israel calling their bluff—if the U.S. holds firm—exposes their impotence. If Israel bombed the ICC in the Hague – No War. No boots. No tanks. NO Article 5 Nato involvement. The collapse of Nato as an alliance.
Symbolic institutions (like the ICC) to claim moral authority—but has no spine when force or geopolitical will counters that narrative. If Israel, backed by a U.S. administration, were to shatter a legal myth like the ICC’s authority … No war, but rather most likely the total collapse of EU imperialist Post WWII illusion of legal hegemony on par with England and France failure to capture and seize the Suez canal in the 1956 War. It would clearly reset the terms of European involvement in global legal power.
Above the law – just like Hitler!
You’re such a nut job. Now you compare the Secretary of State to Adolf Hitler.
Justice Justice Pursue
The concept of Ancient Consciousness Engineering involves understanding how ancient cultures perceived and interacted with the divine, particularly through the art of building and construction. This perspective often highlights the spiritual and symbolic dimensions of architecture, emphasizing how structures reflect the consciousness and beliefs of the societies that created them.
Buildings often incorporated symbols that represented gods, myths, or cosmological theories. For instance, Egyptian temples were aligned with celestial bodies, reflecting the connection between the divine and the cosmic order. Structures like temples or pyramids were often seen as physical manifestations of divine plans, mirroring cosmic structures. The layout of cities and monuments was frequently designed to reflect mythological tales or the lives of deities.
The scale, orientation, and materials used in construction often reflected social hierarchies and religious beliefs. Larger, grander structures typically represented higher spiritual significance or authority. Temples like the Parthenon were dedicated to specific deities and were built to embody their attributes and myths, serving as a focal point for worship and community.
Shlomo’s reign occurred during a time of extensive interaction with neighboring cultures (the Goyim), whose worship practices involved building grand temples dedicated to their gods. This context shaped Solomon’s approach to architecture and spirituality. Shlomo deluged with foreign wives, starting with the daughter of Par’o. Many ancient cultures valued grand temple architecture as a reflection of their gods’ majesty. The Egyptians, Greeks, and Mesopotamians built magnificent structures to honor their deities.
His construction of the Temple was a pivotal ירידות הדורות moment for Judaism. The בית שני Talmud response to king Shlomo’s avoda zara which so dominated later generations, beginning with Ezra’s rebuilding of a 2nd Temple avoda zara abomination. The Talmud Bavli prioritized the בית המקדש not as a building of wood and stone. It interpreted the Torah construction of the Mishkan as only a משל.
The anointing of the house of David as Moshiach likewise a משל through which the prophet Shmuel interpreted its נמשל response to the rebellion of Israel against the Torah, the anointing first Shaul and later David as Moshiach! Based upon the prophetic mussar of the prophet Natan תוחקה mussar rebuke which he instructed both David and Shlomo. Natan saved Shlomo and his mother in the opening Book of Kings. רחבעם ignored the advise given by the elder advisors of Shlomo just as Shlomo did the exact same with the תוחקה mussar rebuke wherewith the prophet Natan commanded Shlomo not to build the בית המקדש but rather prioritize building the establishment of a Federal Sanhedrin common law court system; based upon the p’suk: צדק צדק תרדוף.
The Talmud comments on the consequences of avoda zara associated with Shlomo and later generations, emphasizing the need for prioritizing Courtroom common law justice over Pie in the Sky theological beliefs in Gods, associated with Shlomo and all later ירידות הדורות generations. Prophets like Natan admonished Shlomo regarding his actions, instructing him to focus on establishing a system of justice (Federal Sanhedrin) rather than solely on temple construction.
The anointing of David and later Shlomo as Moshiach reflects a broader narrative regarding leadership and adherence to Torah centered upon the pursuit of judicial justice based upon the memory of judicial injustice before the Court of Par’o and the מוסר תוחקה which Yitro rebuked Moshe immediately after Israel gained our National freedom from Par’o and Egypt. Israel came out of Egypt in accordance with the oath brit sworn to the Avot concerning the eternal inheritance of this land. HaShem brought Israel out of Egypt with the k’vanna that Israel would rule the land with righteous judicial justice – fair restitution of damages inflicted.
Xtianity and Islam, their av tuma avoda zarah prioritizes belief in God – just as does assimilated Rambam’s 13 essential beliefs! In point of fact, the Torah commands no belief in God or Gods. Its this distinction which separates the revelation of the Torah at Sinai from belief in av tuma avoda zara Gods – based upon Creeds, theologies or Angelic revelations! Therefore Prophets like Natan and all other prophets thereafter admonished Shlomo and all the kings of Yechuda and Israel – regarding their failure to prioritize judicial justice through common law courtrooms. The mussar תוחקה of all NaCH prophets therefore instructs both Shlomo and all generations of our Cohen people thereafter, to focus upon ruling the oath sworn lands of the chosen Cohen people with justice – Federal Sanhedrin – common law justice.
The prophetic mussar rebuke of Cain & Abel serves as the יסוד upon which stands the Torah revelation of the Mishkan with its required korbanot dedications. The central Torah theme: Who merits as the Chosen Cohen, initiated through the murder of Abel by his older brother following the korban dedications made by both sons of Adam HaReshon. Cain offered as his korban – a barbeque unto Heaven. Abel dedicated his korban to אל מלך נאמן – God the faithful King … Faith understood as meaning fair judicial justice. Hence the prophet Shmuel interpreted the נמשל mitzva of Moshiach based upon the משל mussar taught through the commandment of the Mishkan together with korbanot.
Moshe, the greatest of all Torah prophets commands prophetic mussar. Hence all other NaCH prophets – they too command mussar rebukes. Mussar defines all prophetic revelations recorded in the literature of the T’NaCH. Witchcraft and/or Goyim prophets like Bil’aam – their av tuma avoda zara predicts the future. The NT framers, they depicted their imaginary false messiah JeZeus as a person/God who fulfilled the words of the prophets. Hence the NT framers redefined T’NaCH prophets including Moshe Rabbeinu as witches because witches foretell the future.
C. S. Lewis, the moral coward, never denounced the church guilt for the Shoah. Lucy Maud Montgomery, was a Canadian author best known for her classic novel Anne of Green Gables, published in 1908. L.M. Montgomery passed away on April 24, 1942. Church’s silence during the Holocaust (Shoah), coupled with the Catholic Rat Lines that assisted Nazi War criminals to flee justice by hiding in S. American countries and the post WWII Polish pogroms! This has led to discussions about the responsibilities of faith leaders and the impact of moral cowardice in the face of atrocity. Lewis and Tolstoy both failed to address the war crimes committed by their people in their life times. Tolstoy failed to condemn the Czarist Pogroms of the 1880s and the secret police forgery: The Protocols of the Elders of Zion.
L.M. Montgomery, while primarily focused on themes of childhood and community in her novels, lived during a time that contained its own set of moral struggles, including the events of World War II. She never publicly condemned the 1938 pogrom: Night of Shattered Glass. The failure of figures like Lewis and Tolstoy to address grave injustices raises questions about moral courage and the obligations of public intellectuals. The Church’s silence and the concealment of war criminals spotlight the responsibilities of faith leaders in the face of atrocities.
C.S. Lewis labeled a “moral coward” for his silence regarding the Church’s role during the Holocaust. The lack of denunciation of institutional wrongs at a time when moral clarity was crucial exposed the truth of his moral spinelessness. Similarly, Leo Tolstoy’s inaction regarding the Czarist pogroms and The Protocols of the Elders of Zion reflects a pattern of moral evasion. L.M. Montgomery’s literary focus on childhood and personal growth didn’t typically address societal issues.
The silence of various Christian denominations during the Holocaust, specifically the Lutheran support for Hitler’s Nazism, coupled with actions like the Catholic Rat Lines, raises critical questions. The failure to confront and condemn atrocities reflects a broader moral cowardice among faith leaders. The concealment of Nazi war criminals illustrates a deep conflict between moral teachings and institutional actions. Pope Pius XII permitted the Nazis to murder the Jews of Rome. What is the responsibility of public intellectuals in speaking out against injustice? Should their focus include social or political obligations? How should churches and faith institutions hold themselves accountable for past inactions?
Authors and intellectuals are often perceived not just as commentators but as moral agents who can influence public opinion and action. Navigating the balance between personal beliefs and public responsibility poses complex ethical questions, particularly during times of upheaval. Religious and social institutions need to confront their past in order to guide future actions and regain credibility. Institutions must not only teach values of justice and ethics but also demonstrate commitment through action, particularly in contexts of societal injustice. These reflections challenge both individuals and organizations to consider the implications of their actions (or inactions) in the face of moral crises.
Did not write a commentary on the political content of the Obliviousness article. Rather my commentary transposes the structure of Obliviousness into a Torah-based, oath brit, judicial reading. The relationship works on the level of intent, not topic. As an Israeli my world completely different than an American perspective. The American society ruled by Power rather than justice. The Courts – utterly and totally corrupt. The contrast of Trump out of power and Trump as President – Night and Day different. The two assassination attempts and the political assassination of Charlie Kirk define the deep fractures of American political insanity.
Obliviousness — Society is falling apart because institutions have abandoned accountability.
Power replaces justice. Systems that should deliver fairness instead deliver corruption, secrecy, and self-serving elites. The public is deceived by structures that look like order (government, churches, media) but conceal rot. The consequences are systemic: shutdown, corruption, violence, failed leadership, manipulation of justice, tribalism. America exists as a nation on the verge of anarchy and collapse because justice – an utter joke. Obama Clinton and the Intelligence Agency heads have yet to stand trial for treason. Pelosi, Schiff, Nadler, Waters likewise have never stood trial for the charge of treason.
The Israeli Torah perspective: ancient kings abandoning צדק צדק תרדוף and falling into avoda zara. Oblivious shows what happens when a society replaces justice with spectacle, belief systems, and personality cults. While Justice Pursue argues that this likewise occurred under king Shlomo and Yeridas HaDorot of g’lut rabbinic Judaism which assimilated to Roman statute law and abandoned Torah as judicial common law. The Temple becomes a theological object (avoda zara) rather than a metaphor for judicial structures. Belief replaces courtroom justice. Theology replaces the oath alliance expressed through judicial common law. Power (kingship) replaces federal Sanhedrin.
My comment reads Oblivious as a modern example of the ancient pattern of civilizational decline caused by abandoning common-law justice. Elite corruption & hidden crimes (Epstein / Obama, Pelosi, Schiff, Nadler, Waters, CIA, FBI, NSA Heads). Shlomo’s foreign alliances, wives, temple grandeur → political rot → prophetic rebuke; Justice Pursue interprets this modern collapse as the same pattern the prophets condemned.
Citizens suffer because leaders reject accountability — Prophetic critique: kings of Yehuda rejected תוחקה and צדק. Just as Oblivious describes democratic institutions failing their people; Justice Pursue argues that ancient Israel fell for the same reason. Party loyalty and personality cults replace honest governance. Avoda zara: divine right of kings replaces common-law rank-and-file judicial authority – the foundation upon which the American Republic stands. Oblivious sees American politics becoming a cult of personality. Justice Pursue says: this is literally the biblical definition of avoda zara.
Collapse of public trust; no one believes institutions anymore. Natan the Prophet’s warnings: society cannot survive without justice. All NaCH prophets’ focus prioritized not theology/Democracy, but legal structure. The article Obliviousness – The same spiritual mistake that the Torah warns about. A society becomes idolatrous when it substitutes belief, symbols, or buildings for courtroom justice. America today Washington has replaced Justice. Oblivious replaces justice with conspiracy narratives, personality cults, theocratic rhetoric, media mythologies, spectacle politics.
Ancient Israel did the same when it replaced the federal Sanhedrin, mussar rebuke, case law with statute law, Temple fixations, kings, theological dogmas, Greek-style creed systems (Par’o, later Rambam’s 13 ikarim). There is no civilization without צדק צדק תרדוף. Therefore my commentary functions as the נמשל to Oblivious as the משל. All civilizations collapse when they abandon common-law justice for belief systems (avoda zara). Justice Pursue reveals the ancient consciousness engineering behind the pattern of national decline.
Everything you observe in modern America – the Oblivious Article – the same pattern that destroyed ancient Israel and every empire thereafter. It is the structural sin of replacing justice with belief, power, and symbols. Torah and prophecy diagnose the disease at its root.
Well I agree that replacing justice, science and truth with belief is a disaster!
Genocide occurs when the people in power worship power rather than pursue justice. An obvious disconnect as if a fly flew on your nose and you remained totally unaware of its presence upon your nose – that’s the oppression of genocide.
Genocide is when one race kills, rapes and systematically tries to destroy another race – just like Israel is doing in Gaza – starving children, destroying homes, shooting, bombing and terrorising. Just like the hideous far-right Nazi Jewish settlers are doing when they systematically attack, kill, injure and try to drive out the inhabitants. That’s the definition of genocide.
You’re interpretation – bat shit crazy. As of early January 2025, the population has declined by approximately 6%, which equates to about 160,000 people. The percentage of population loss for Germany and Japan after World War II estimates suggest a decline of approximately 10% of the pre-war population. Japan experienced a decline of about 3% to 4%. As of early January 2025, the estimated percentage of population loss due to the ongoing war between Russia and Ukraine varies based on sources. Ukraine has experienced an estimated loss of about 10% to 15% of its pre-war population. Russia has seen a smaller percentage loss, approximately 2% to 3% of its pre-war population.
European EU states hostile to Israeli dominance in directing the balance of power across Middle Eastern states rabidly oppose attempts made by Israel in increase their influence in the UN.
Many critics, specifically EU, Russian, Chinese imperialist states, argue that enhanced Israeli influence could result in a biased approach to international diplomacy, particularly concerning the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Other countries don’t have conflicts? This “perception of bias” utterly absurd. The UN has absolutely no credibility as a neutral mediator – based upon all the UN condemnations of Israel. The PLO Charter of 1964 only referred to ’48 Israel as “occupied territory”.
Post ’67 UN propaganda which unilaterally declares Samaria/west bank and Gaza as “occupied” utter revisionist history. Attempts to hold Israel accountable for winning the ’48 and ’67 wars? What complete and utter trash! Blood libel slanders which unilaterally condemn Israel for human rights violations yet ignores the slaughter of Israeli Olympic athletes in Munich 1972 and the bus bombing terrorism which forced Israel to build a separation fence – utter revisionist history. Palestinians as stateless dhimmi refugees have no rights. Not in any Arab country and not in Israel!
Palestine as a mandate territory ceased to exist in 1948. Israel’s growing influence in the UN can have ripple effects on U.S. foreign policy and its relationships with other countries in the Middle East. The dynamics could shift alliances and alter strategies of regional powers. What’s wrong with Israel promoting their own strategic interests like any other UN member state?
660.000 Iraqis died in the American invasion. Gaza which started a war which it lost lost 69,000. A factorial difference of almost 10 times! Go fuck yourself Oaf er!
משנה תורה – קידושין Common Law
Shalom and Howdy from Israel. As a Jew I am an atheist praise the Gods. Theology and Creed based belief systems an abomination to me. Torah faith defined as the pursuit of judicial justice which strives to make fair restitution of damages inflicted. Torah law – a judicial common law system. The idea that the State pays the salaries of judges and prosecuting attorneys – bribery. Revolutionary America despised the vertical Star Courts whose bought and paid for judges justified and validated British impressment of American sailors, stolen off of American ships on international waters…The behavior of the American courts toward Trump before and after he won the election – day and night difference! What a total disgrace, proof that the American judicial system totally corrupt together with Nancy Pelosi and her ilk who made 100s of millions from insider trading! Forced to resign in disgrace from Congress, but that hardly qualifies as justice.
Torah defines “love” as ownership. A man cannot love that which he does not own. The Talmud interprets love through theft of his property. It teaches the mussar that a person attaches a portion of his soul to his owned property. “Life liberty and property” to keep this in an American context. Torah common law learns “love” through the mitzva of קידושין. Marriage – a man acquires his wife! But a woman simply not a slave or a whore – which can be bought and sold! So what does a man “acquire” through Cash, Contract, or Sex?
Torah a common law legal system. Common law stands upon the central premise that it requires similar Case/Rule precedential judicial rulings. American literature 101 calls this “Compare and Contrast”. The opposite of marriage – divorce. קידושין כנגד גט. A evil man who divorces his wife but treacherously refuses to give her her “Get”/גט makes this woman a “jailed”/agunah woman. This woman if she has a child from another man without her “get” births bastard children. How does this legal condition qualify as being – at all fair and just?
A superficial reactionary reading of the language of the Torah/Talmud – known as פשט – has no explanation. Hence rabbinic Judaism stuck in a טיפש פשט bird-brained box thinking unjust legal system! This type of law known as חוקים. Torah common law – judicial courtroom law based upon precedent similar Case/Rule -rulings made by earlier courts. Queer statute law Judaism – utterly perverted.
Torah Law (חוקים) has nothing to do with the absurd-unknowable divine revelation. That’s Xtian and Muslim avoda zarah whose theologies and creed belief systems create their Gods from nothing other than Human belief systems. Mishnaic Common law originated from human experiences and societal needs rather than some pie in the sky divine angelic command like Muhammad’s Koran. Mishnaic common law – Court room judicial rulings.
What does “derived from oral traditions/Oral Torah even mean? The kabbala taught by rabbis Akiva and Yishmael and Yossi HaGalilee פרדס ומידות. Herein defines “Oral Torah”. פרדס not a mystical interpretation but rather a 4 part inductive reasoning logic system. Its stands separate and apart from Plato and Aristotlte’s 3 part syllogism deductive reasoning logic system.
Unlike the syllogistic method of deduction which dominates Greek philosophy (i.e., moving from general principles to specific conclusions), Pardes employs a fluid inductive comparative analysis approach. This means that insights, derived from similar precedent Case/Rule judicial rulings. As a loom has a warp – weft, the Talmud has halacha – aggada.
The latter entails making a דרוש\פשט of T’NaCH prophetic mussar, which the Talmud, which means learning, cleverly weaves through רמז\סוד transforming toldot-secondary commandments & halachot – which do not require k’vanna – unto time-oriented commandments which do require k’vanna. Raising the status of rabbinic halachot to Torah time-oriented commandments defines how the Talmud/Oral Torah halachot – ritual religious observances – qualify as commandments from the Torah revelation at Sinai. Hence the reason why Oral Torah requires common law judicial precedents. Time not determined by a clock but rather prophetic mussar k’vanna. A fundamental רב חסד מאי נפקא מינא.
גופא, which means returning back to the original discussion following a digression. What does a man acquire through the “action” of קידושין? He acquires title to the woman’s “Nefesh O’lam Ha’Bah soul. What does this mean? Answer: her future born children. Based upon the precedent of Avram’s complaint to HaShem: ‘What can you give me seeing that I have no children to inherit my wealth’? This question defines the oath alliance sworn – commonly known as the brit between the pieces, as found in Parsha לך לך – the 3rd Parsha of the Book of בראשית. Upon this bedrock foundation stands the Torah mitzva of both קידושין וגט. We have completed the circle.
Why are the children which an Agunah woman births considered “bastards”? The mitzva of קידושין the man swears a Torah oath before two witnesses and a minyon of 10 men (like the 10 spies in the days of Moshe, or the 10 plagues or the 10 commandments etc – meaning a public event). Swearing a Torah oath/brit cut upon the soul of a man. What defines the soul of a Man? Answer: His children. The birth of his children, understood as his portion in O’lam Ha’bah!
But that רשע who refuses to give his ex wife her “get” too faces a horrific בנין אב precedent! Just as the גר צדק/convert qualifies as a “new creation” so too the Court has the power to impose the ban of נידוי/cherem upon this רשע which makes him a “new creation” – not Jewish. Race or DNA do not determine the Jewishness of a child. Similar to how the ticking of time on a clock likewise does not shape nor determines time-oriented commandments! Only the mother determines the Jewishness of any child born in this world. Hence the court can retroactively annul the original קידושין and issue a גט to this chained woman permitting her to marry a far more worthy man.
The language of the קריא שמע, law essentially interprets language, בכל נפשך – specifically “contract law”. Torah understood as a contract and not a theological creed belief system. Hence the wisdom of the Oral Torah it interprets the contract of the Written Torah oath brit alliance through out the generations. Interpretation of texts fluid like the falling of rain in its due season. פרדס inductive logic a dynamic rather than static syllogism deductive reasoning model. The skill required to design moving parts like as in an internal combustion engine, a completely different engineering skill than designing a fixed bridge which spans a river.
Mark the contrast between T’NaCH common law legalism from Xtian propaganda preaching theology.
Proverbs 16:1-10 located within the T’NaCH sugya/sub-chapter of 15:20 – 17:24. The NT avoda zara propaganda rhetoric narishkeit trash “loves” to quote T’NaCH sources taken out of context. The bible abomination of the church perverted translations – Universally corrupt and evil. Taking an idea out of its surrounding contexts defines propaganda NOT T’NaCH common law. The NT Roman forgery would make Joseph Goebbels, the Propganda Minister of Nazi Germany – PROUD.
Taking T’NaCH sources ripped apart from their contexts compares to how abortion clinics employ suction to rip apart heads feet legs of unborn babies from its mothers’ womb for money. God has the same letters as DOG. The NT fulfilling the words of the Prophets – a brutal abortion of T’NaCH literature. The Old Testament bible of the church – an utter abomination! It replaces the natural order of sugya context replaced by the church perversion of Chapters and verses. Pardon me as I puke.
T’NaCH faith all about the pursuit of justice and fair restitution of damages inflicted upon others. The church whore turned faith into a theological creed belief system which created Gods from nothing. The Koran did the same Av tuma avoda zara with the creation of Allah. Both belief systems despise the Torah faith that enshrines the righteous pursuit of judicial justice. Judicial common law courtrooms share nothing in common with Cult of personality decrees; Paul declared to Goyim: YOU ARE NOT UNDER THE LAW. His propaganda half-truth failed to discern that 1) Goyim rejected the revelation of the Torah at Sinai, so naturally Goyim not under the Law. Goyim never taken out of Egypt by HaShem. They remain in foreign lands and countries; the oath sworn to Avraham that the chosen Cohen seed of the Avot would inherit the oath sworn lands of Canaan. And rule those oath sworn brit alliance lands with judicial common law justice. 2) Roman law – statute law not common law. A day vs night difference which the church whore of Babylon has totally ignored for 2000+ years; on par with the church denial of the Oral Torah revelation at Horev following the sin of the Golden Calf. The church bible duplicates the sin of the Golden Calf in that it translates the 1st commandment Spirit Name unto word translations. No word can translate the Name of HaShem – that’s the sin of the Golden Calf!
Xtian believers have no sincerity. Proof: Never in 2000+ years has even a single Xtian or Muslim “believer” ever caught the Golden Calf Av tuma that Monotheism violates the 2nd Sinai commandment. If only ONE GOD then no need to command the second commandment; all the Books of the Prophets which address the tuma worship of other Gods, starting with Par’o and the Egyptian worship of other Gods, followed by all the kings of Canaan who worshipped other Gods! Goyim have no t’shuva, they remember nothing of their past war crimes against humanity because they have absolutely no shame.
T’NaCH simply not read as a novel. The church whore never grasped the basics of T’NaCH common law. Common law stands upon the foundation of precedents. The arrangement of the Holy Writings within the Books of the T’NaCH serves as a precedent for the later arrangement of the Gemara commentary to the Mishna. Rabbi Yechuda the Chief Justice of the Great Sanhedrin Court codified his common law Mishna in 210 CE. Why did he name this common law codification of Great Sanhedrin judicial ruling by the name Mishna? Because the 5th Book of the Written Torah, known as D’varim, has a second name: Mishna Torah. What does Mishna Torah mean? Answer: Common Law. Hence rabbi Yechuda’s Mishna codifies Great Sanhedrin Courtroom ruling organized as “Common Law” – hence “Mishna”.
As the Holy Writings Books of T’NaCH literature serve as a commentary to the Books of the Prophets of the NaCH so too the Gemara duplicates/mirrors the Holy Writings Books of T’NaCH, it makes a common law commentary to interpret the k’vanna of the language of the Mishna. The whore of Babylon church abomination never grasped the obvious; it preferred to burn the Talmud (which means learning) predating the Nazi book burnings of the 1930s. Goyim have no t’shuva because they do not remember the war crimes committed by generations of church believers across the millennia of their Par’o like injustice and oppression. All the church great cathedrals built through serf slave labor. It took the American and French Revolutions to cast the whore of Babylon church upon the dung heaps of history ie 1) Separation of Church from State 2) citizens rather than feudal serfs. 3) taxation without representation.
T’NaCH a common law legal system – just that simple. Common law stands upon the foundation of making logical Case/Rule judical comparative rulings. The Book of Proverbs serves as a “Gemara” commentary to the Books of the “Mishna” Prophets. That’s how the Game played in order to righteously pursue judicial justice – no fancy dance’n. The sugya of Proverbs aligns with the NaCH Book of Yirmeyahu/Jeremiah 10:22-25. Just as the Gemara serves its Mishna through comparative precedents so too the Holy Writings serves the NaCH Books of the Prophets through comparative precedents. This requires inductive logic as opposed to deductive logic. The church whore of Babylon has never developed a systematic inductive reasoning thought process – not to this very day! How utterly bankrupt and pathetic.
The mussar of the sugya of Proverbs interprets the k’vanna of Yirmeyahu’s prophetic mussar for all generations of Israel. Only Jews within the borders of the oath sworn lands can do mitzvot לשמה, based upon the 1st Commandment of Sinai. HaShem brought Israel out of Egypt, Jews in g’lut remain in Egypt. Therefore Jews in g’lut worship other Gods, just as Par’o worshipped other Gods. Israel accepted only the first Two Sinai commandments till Moshe instructed the rest of the Torah revelation after the Oral Torah interpreted the intent of all Torah commandments and Talmudic halachot – as viewed through the prism of tohor time-oriented Av Torah commandments. The Torah brit – ruling the land with justice vs g’lut. Blessing vs. curse. Life vs. Death — choose.
A D’varim/Mishna Torah בנין אב\precedent: D’varim 5:16-18. Bereshit 3:14 – 21. The story of Adam first introduces g’lut. The story of Cain likewise introduces how a son dishonors his parents by assuming that offering a barbeque to heaven equals dedication through an oath alliance the commitment to pursue justice among the chosen Cohen People.
Not enough to cast the grave of Rambam upon the dung heaps of history.
The Avot—Avraham, Yitzchak, and Yaakov—represent different paradigms of connection with God and expressions of faith. Not like Avraham who called it [the Beis Hamikdash] “mountain,” and not like Yitzchak who called it “field,” but rather like Yaakov who called it “house. . .” (Pesachim 88a)… What an utterly pathetic mistranslation!
The story of Avraham Yitzak and Yaacov centered upon the wells they dug for their sheep. But only idiots assume that the Avot lived their lives as simple shepherds of sheep and goats! The Beis Hamikdash not some glorified slaughter house! It housed both the Great Sanhedrin and a Small Sanhedrin Federal Courtroom of Common Law!
The story of the korbanot dedicated by Kayin neged Hevel centers upon the choice of who merits to live as the chosen Cohen son! Kayin, like Yishmael, & Esav born as the first born son! A major Torah theme played throughout the Sin of the Golden Calf and the replacement of the first born son with the Tribe of Levi!
The prophetic mussar of the rejection of the korban dedicated by Kayin, HaShem does not recognize korbanot as a barbeque to heaven, a תולדות קום ועשה מצוה!!!! A korban requires that a person swears a Torah oath – through the altar like unto standing before a Sefer Torah – מלכות dedicates as specific tohor middah – like a toldoth “blessing” of oaths requires שם ומלכות – committing to the eternal pursuit of justice/צדק צדק תרידוף. Just that simple.
The Torah does not compare to Av tuma avoda zarah which prioritizes “Great theological themes” concerning belief in different Gods — the Lord vs Allah — any more that the Book of ויקרא commands offering korbanot as a ritual commandment like the קום ועשה תולדות הלכות of the Shulkan Aruch do not require k’vanna! Simple קום ועשה ושב ולא תעשה מצוות, do not require k’vanna. This definition makes them secondary commandments to time-oriented commandments!
The Talmud has a warp/weft Halacha\Aggada loom like structure which weaves the garments, comparable to the Book of שמות garments made for the House of Aaron! Its not the literal garments of the House of Aaron משל but rather the customs and culture of the House of the Chosen Cohen people נמשל. The נמשל defines the כוונה of the משל; as such time-oriented commandments Av commandments.
The Torah not some glorified Book of Jewish religion similar to the Books of the New Testament and Koran Av tuma avoda zarah! The Torah serves as the Constitution of the Republic of 12 Tribes; it serves the same exact function as the Constitution of the United States – basic Law! Based upon the 1st Sinai Commandment. אני ה’ אלהיך אשר הוצאתיך מארץ מצרים מבית עבדים. This the greatest of all Torah commandments – Jews who live in G’lut cannot accept the Torah as the Constitution of our Republic לשמה. G’lut Jewry cursed like Kayin, forced to worship av tuma avoda zarah as a religious belief system theology rather than as the substance of leaving Egypt to conquer Canaan.
Off the דרך Orthodox Judaism declared their av tuma declaration of faith – in the early Twentieth Century – when they declared Zionism as both secondary and foreign to the Torah faith. Absolutely a direct repetition of the Wilderness Generation which condemned the First Born Generation to accept the revelation of the Torah at Sinai as not having a portion to the World to Come.
The Avot: falsely perceived as but a simple משל “mountain”, or “field”, or “house”, in equal like manner the משל בית המקדש. The lives of the Avot introduce the נמשל dedication – pursuit of justice within the oath sworn lands of Canaan. G’lut Jews who remain in exile cannot accept the revelation of the Torah at Sinai – the first commandment – לשמה, because they live their lives permanently in g’lut with no real or honest intention to make aliya. No different than the Shoah Wilderness Generation which has no portion in the World to Come.
The Book of בראשית introduces אב טהור זימן גרמא מצוות, like the Aggada of the Sha’s makes a דרוש\פשט to the prophetic mussar taught through the Books of the T’NaCH! Wisdom requires “shepherds” to weave the wool and linen threads of Halacha and Aggadah unto “garments” that the House of Aaron can wear in the “Beit HaMikdosh”. Obviously mixing wool & linen requires k’vaana as a time-oriented mitzva!
Only Jews who live in the oath sworn lands, who dedicate their Zionism as the eternal pursuit of self-determination to rule these lands with Sanhedrin lateral common law courts of Federal justice; as the basis of law of the Republic over the secondary Government rule of law by statute government Knesset decrees. Herein defines the meaning of Zionism post ’48 and ’67 Independence Wars victories! Common law judicial law the נמשל priority over Statute Law Knesset משל תולדות law. Do the Toldoth follow the Avot Yes or No? The defining question asked by Mesechtot Shabbat and Baba Kama.
The pursuit of judicial justice shares no common ground with personal belief systems/Creeds of faith about Gods in Heaven. Torah justice in this Earth, not in the Heaven skies above. Theological belief systems Av tuma avoda zarah. G’lut Jews cannot, by definition of the first Sinai commandment, possess genuine intention or moral integrity to accept the revelation of the Torah at Sinai, they remain in g’lut. Only within the borders of the oath sworn lands of alliance can Jews establish self determination of ruling the lands of Canaan with righteous Judicial common law justice. Sanhedrin common Law, UNLIKE the Rambam, Tur, Beit Yosef & Shulkan Aruch statute religious codes of ritual halacha,, centers upon judicial rulings which achieve fair restitution of damages inflicted by Jews upon other Jews.
Ritual religious observances do not weave the woolen & linen garments as time-oriented commandments. Av tohor time-oriented commandments they weave the culture and customs practiced by the Chosen Cohen Nation within the borders of the Jewish State of Israel.
G’lut Jews their Beit Din – a joke. The three Justices of their Torts court, do not divide their duties as Prosecuting כנגד Defense justices – who argue their opposing cases before one another through bringing halachic precedents, like as the Gemara does to each and every Mishna which it comments upon!
Religious ritual observances share no common ground with righteous common law courts of law; any more than do the Yad, Tur, Aruch assist students to study Talmudic common law. Torah does not “compare” to a Constitution any more than does a דיוק נמשל actually compares to its משל metaphor.
Employment of משל\נמשל a method of Hebrew speech. Children only understand the simple stories. Adults who cling to the understanding of children – what an utter disgrace. The challenge of maintaining a strong Jewish identity in g’lut … antisemitism-the curse of Amalek.
Jewish assimilation and intermarriage with Goyim invokes the curse of the 2nd Sinai commandment from generation to generation. Herein explains why the B’HaG ruled that the mitzva of reading the M’gillah qualifies as a time oriented commandment from the Torah.
The ever repeated conclusions made by generation after generation of g’lut Jews, that they can live in peace in g’lut – utterly false. Herzl understood that the curse of European antisemitism has no cure. Its a cancer of the Goyim minds which no doctor can heal. Only Jews who commit to leaving g’lut Egypt, a לאו דוקא משל, and making aliya to Israel — possess the potential to acquire Zionism – Jewish self determination to pursue justice among and between our own people.
Genocide, a profane taboo word, commonly raped pillaged and burned among people who abhor the Israeli response to the Oct 7th 2023 massacre. Genocide in this context, amounts to Holocaust denial. A word meant to prevent another Shoah has been weaponized to accuse Jews of committing the very crime inflicted upon them.
Genocide — a word forged in the ashes of the Shoah — has become a profane taboo, violated, cheapened, and weaponized by those who abhor Israel’s response to the Oct. 7th 2023 massacre. In this context, the accusation is not merely false; it amounts to Holocaust denial. A term meant to prevent another genocide is now hurled against the Jewish state in a grotesque inversion of history: the victims accused of the crime that nearly annihilated them.
This version of the Xtian Church infamous blood libel. Manufactured and disseminated by the UN, EU bureaucrats, Moscow, Beijing, and the media conglomerates that sell “genocide headlines” the way pornography sells clicks. Genocide sells. Justice does not. And so, the word violently and brutally raped and pillaged for political theatre rather than applied with legal integrity. Genocide occurs when those in power worship power itself, not justice. But no one dares question the motives of the institutions promoting this Blood Libel slander. Why? Because the same leaders, together with their institutions, have grown dependent on the “Jewish problem” narrative to justify their own existence.
Never once has anyone questioned the agenda of an organization that promotes this “Blood Libel Slander” made against Israel. Israel did not sign the Rome Agreement which established the International Court of the Hague. In point of fact, NEVER AGAIN, as PM Begin expressly communicated to Jimmy Carter at Camp David, means that Israelis post the European “Final Solution” will ever again permit, specifically European Goyim States, to dictate their “SOLUTION” to “THE JEWISH PROPLEM”. Israel rejects the idea that: (1) Jews exist again a ward of Europe. (2) Jewish sovereignty pre-conditional to UN approval. (3) Jewish self-defense is subject to foreign veto. Thus, the ICC’s attempted jurisdiction is a political fiction—an extension of the pre-1948 mindset that Jews do not have independent standing among nations. The ICC’s claim of jurisdiction over Israel: a fiction built on an older fiction. This accusation of “genocide” guilt imposed by Press decree upon Israel, simply the old paternalism in a new legal wrapper of classic South African Apartheid racism.
The accusation of “genocide” against Israel after Oct. 7, a form of modernized Holocaust denial — a mutation of the classic European blood libel — and the UN’s usage of the term reveals a long-standing imperial contempt for Jewish sovereignty. The UN never had moral universality. It functioned from birth as a colonial power-balancing instrument, and its treatment of Israel, merely the most concentrated exposure of its original design flaws. Where medieval Xtendom accused Jews of murdering Xtian children, the modern UN-Leftist coalition accuses Jews of murdering Palestinian children.
The replacement theology converts the UN as the new Ersatz-Xtianity. The idea of a secularized form of Xtianity that rejects the theological trappings of the Gospel narrative, but retains dogmatic moral and ethical frameworks associated with Papal Rome. This concept often manifests in political contexts, where political ideologies adopt seemingly Xtian ethical principles, like for an example: a just war, without engaging theological ‘Good News’ yet promoting the new religion of democracy.
The UN originally set up to prevent another Shoah. Clearly the UN has failed its mandate and MUST disband. What does the UN have to do with the Xtian “Genocide” in Nigeria? Or Pol Pot, or Idi[ot] Amin? The UN promotes platitudes rather than pursues justice. The UN today totally not recognizable to the UN of 1948. Pursuit of power and political coalitions of State international alliances has completely uprooted the founding Charter. The UN systematically ignores or minimizes actual genocide, mass slaughter, and mass enslavement when politically inconvenient. The UN protects authoritarian regimes with bloc voting. The Human Rights Council institutionalizes political scapegoating. UN Bloc voting by authoritarian states has turned this pie in the sky replacement of Wilson’s post WWI League of Nations into a political marketplace where justice get bought and sold on the illegal white women, and child-slave trade-markets.
Franklin D. Roosevelt U.S. President; championed the idea of a global peace organization. Eleanor Roosevelt, Chairperson of the UN Commission on Human Rights; pivotal in drafting the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Winston Churchill – British Prime Minister; advocated for collective security and cooperation. Joseph Stalin – Soviet Dictator primarily responsible for the Allied victory over the Nazis; boycotted the UN Chapter VII dictate to North Korea. Charles de Gaulle – not included at the Yalta Conference, French Resistance leader; crucial in representing defeated France’s interests post-WWII wherein France sat as a Permanent Member in the UN Security Council. De Gaulle as a statesman, succeeded in asserting France’s interests in the aftermath of World War II. Harry S. Truman, U.S. President after FDR; supported the formation and principles of the UN which negated the Constitutional Right of Congress to Declare War.
The Yalta Conference, held in February 1945, was a pivotal meeting between Franklin D. Roosevelt, Winston Churchill, and Joseph Stalin to discuss the post-war reorganization of Europe and the establishment of international cooperation through the United Nations. Their responses varied significantly, reflecting their distinct national interests and ideologies. Stalin showed a positive attitude towards Roosevelt’s proposal for a new international organization aimed at maintaining peace. He recognized the need for a framework to manage post-war tensions and prevent conflicts. These men who built the UN, represent colonial empires, racial hierarchies, colonial interests, and military blocs.
Stalin insisted that the new organization must include mechanisms that recognized the Soviet Union’s status as a major power. He wanted assurances that Soviet interests and security concerns, particularly in Eastern Europe, would be addressed. While agreeing to the formation of the United Nations, Stalin was adamant about establishing Soviet influence in Eastern Europe, emphasizing a security buffer to protect the Soviet Union from future aggression. Clearly the Democratic Party leadership attempt to increase the NATO alliance to include these same Eastern European countries into the NATO alliance, specifically the Ukraine, no UN Resolution has ever condemned.
Churchill was more cautious regarding Stalin’s intentions. He was supportive of the idea of a United Nations but harbored concerns about Soviet expansionism and the balance of power in Europe. Churchill advocated for a United Nations that emphasized democratic principles and human rights. He urged for a system that would prevent the imposition of totalitarian regimes, especially in nations liberated from Nazi occupation. Yet the UN promotes Arab dictatorships, specifically Palestinian Arab dictatorships, precisely following the Oct 7th 2023 massacre of Israelis. Churchill wrote the first White Paper, this man focused his interests over British domination upon any new balance of power political arrangement.
Stalin’s enthusiasm for the concept of the United Nations demonstrated a strategic acknowledgment of the necessity for international governance. This was essential for managing tensions after the war. His insistence on recognizing the Soviet Union’s status as a major power was non-negotiable. The establishment of a security buffer in Eastern Europe was paramount for him, as it aligned with the Soviet doctrine of protecting its borders from perceived threats. Stalin’s strategy foreshadowed the post-war division of Europe. His desire for influence in Eastern Europe laid the groundwork for future Cold War dynamics, where conflicting ideologies and interests between the USSR and Western nations would lead to tension.
Mali announced the expulsion of French troops, effectively ending an French economic or military domination. In similar fashion the governments of Burkina Faso, Niger, Chad, Senegal, & Côte d’Ivoire. The UN never once condemned French neocolonialism. The rise of alternative global partnerships, particularly with nations like China and Russia, has provided Sahelian countries with options to diversify their diplomatic and economic relationships. The UN never condemned Western neocolonial economic structured dominance which favored French interests over African development. Independent Sahelian countries, no thanks to the UN, have started to forge new alliances that prioritize their interests rather than continuing to rely on traditional colonial ties. African sovereignty and control over national resources the UN never recognized.
Jan Christian Smuts, a prominent South African statesman and military leader, had a contentious and complex relationship with Mahatma Gandhi. While they both played influential roles in early 20th-century India and South Africa, their interactions were often marked by significant ideological differences and personal animosity. Smuts held a more conservative viewpoint, often prioritizing colonial interests and the maintenance of order within the British Empire.
One major point of contention was the implementation of discriminatory pass laws targeting Indians in South Africa. Gandhi actively opposed these laws through protests, while Smuts supported the laws as a means of maintaining control. During discussions about Indian representation in South African politics, Smuts was seen as obstructive, further fueling Gandhi’s disdain for him.
Reports suggest that Smuts had a personal dislike for Gandhi, viewing him as a radical undermining British authority in South Africa. This animosity was reflected in their public exchanges and political opposition. Despite their differences, Gandhi’s struggle for Indian rights in South Africa remains a significant historical contribution, overshadowing Smuts’ position at that time. Today, Smuts is often critiqued for his stances, which contributed to systemic discrimination, while Gandhi is celebrated for his non-violent approach to achieving social justice. The relationship between Jan Christian Smuts and Mahatma Gandhi exemplifies the broader tensions of colonial politics, with personal ideologies and ambitions clashing in a critical period of history. Their interactions serve as a lens through which the complexities of resistance against colonial rule can be understood.
Jawaharlal Nehru, as India’s first Prime Minister played a significant role in the establishment of the United Nations (UN). Nehru was a strong proponent of internationalism and believed in the necessity of a global organization to foster peace and cooperation among nations. His vision was largely influenced by the horrors of World War II and the need to prevent future conflicts. Nehru actively participated in key discussions that shaped the UN’s formation. He was part of the Indian delegation at the San Francisco Conference in 1945, where the UN Charter was drafted.
His contributions emphasized the importance of decolonization and civil rights. Nehru advocated for the inclusion of human rights in the UN framework. As a leader from a newly independent nation, he championed the cause of oppressed peoples, aiming for a UN that would not only prevent wars but also promote social justice. Nehru’s commitment to the UN and its principles laid a foundation for India’s active participation in UN affairs, which has continued to influence its foreign policy. His advocacy for peace, cooperation, and justice remains a part of India’s global identity today.
In 1975 the United Nations Human Rights Commission condemned the Augusto Pinochet regime for its widespread human rights violations, including torture and political repression. The resolution called attention to reports of extrajudicial killings, disappearance of political opponents, and the overall lack of civil liberties in Chile under Pinochet’s dictatorship. The Augusto Pinochet regime immediately eclipsed the socialist influence of Hernán Santa Cruz.
Alger Hiss, a high-ranking official in the U.S. State Department and a key figure in the founding meetings of the United Nations. In 1948, Whittaker Chambers, a former communist and journalist, accused Hiss of being a communist spy and of passing classified documents to the Soviet Union. In 1950, Hiss was tried for perjury and was convicted, serving several years in prison. While Hiss was involved in the establishment of the United Nations, serving as a crucial part of the U.S. delegation at the founding conference in 1945, his legacy became overshadowed by the espionage allegations. Historians often debate the extent of his guilt, with some arguing that he was falsely accused.
The Weaponization of “Genocide”, the UN has perverted into a political cudgel, detached from its historical meaning. Its use against Israel, framed as a form of Holocaust denial and “blood libel.” Israel’s Sovereignty Post-Holocaust — “Never Again” means Israel will not allow external powers—especially European states—to dictate Jewish survival, our international borders or our Capital City. Israel’s refusal to sign the Rome Statute, presented as a rejection of foreign-imposed “solutions” which presume Israel remains a Protectorate Territory of the UN or post WWII European Courts of international law.
The UN was created to prevent another Shoah, but instead it promotes platitudes and power politics. Examples: ignoring atrocities in Nigeria, Pol Pot’s Cambodia, Idi Amin’s Uganda, and French neocolonialism in Africa. A UN which continually remains worse than simply silent about its founding premise: preventing unilateral security expansions that could trigger world conflict. A UN which “claims” to defend human rights, built partly by men who defend racially stratified empires.
Selective Condemnations, the UN condemned Pinochet’s Chile but ignored French neocolonialism in Africa. UN resolutions often reflect political convenience rather than consistent justice. The Smuts vs. Gandhi conflict illistrates how the UN’s silence on neocolonial structures in Africa echoes the impact of Colonial legacies.
Alger Hiss’s role in founding the UN is overshadowed by espionage accusations, symbolizing the organization’s compromised legacy, matched only by the grossly perverted number of UN condemnations made against Israel. The UN has always had compromised foundations, and those cracks have widened into fissures today.
The UN never morally coherent. It stands exposed as a truce between competing empires wrapped in universal language. The same Human Rights Commission built by men like Smuts and Santa Cruz now functions as a propaganda bureau for authoritarian regimes. And the same UN founded with Alger Hiss — now shadowed by espionage accusations — continues to operate with layers of clandestine influence.
The weaponization of “genocide”, an old psychological warfare guilt trip, on par with “He died for you”. It continues the old European narative: The Jew as the world’s chief problem. Where once Jews were accused of poisoning wells, today we are accused of poisoning Gaza. Where once Jews were accused of blood crimes, today we are accused of genocide. A system built on the ashes of the Holocaust now recycles Holocaust denial under the guise of human rights.
Why Smuts? Why Gandhi? Why Pinochet? Why the Sahel? Why Nehru? These leaders and countries both tyrants and saints influenced the establishment of the UN, its the failed ‘dream vision’ which ignores the eternal conflict conducted between Power vs. Justice. All the prophets of the T’NaCH pitted justice against avoda zara – the Human worship of power as God.
Israel never signed the Rome Statute. Therefore the ICC has no jurisdiction unless Israel consents which fundamentally profanes the post Shoah sworn oath “NEVER AGAIN”. The ICC’s maneuver relies on the fiction that “Palestine” is a state with standing. British Palestine, established by the League of Nations based upon the Balfour Declaration of 1917 ceased to exist when David Ben Gurion declared Jewish national independence and named the new country Israel in 1948.
Only in 1964 did Egyptian born Yasser Arafat embrace the name of Palestine as central to his PLO Charter. That charter did not view Jordan’s West Bank or Egypt’s Gaza as occupied territory. It limited the phrase “Occupied Territory” only to ’48 Israel. UN Resolutions 242, 338, 446, 2334 etc all political blood libel frauds. UN Resolution 3379 – Zionism is Racism – rejects the Balfour Declaration which fathered the Palestine Mandate of 1921.
So full of shit!
Noise you offer no refutation. Fuck YOU
The Reshonim commentaries upon the Talmud reflect how over time later generations can change, invert, modify, mutate the original language of the T’NaCH\Talmud common law system altered unto a Goyim style statute legal system. An example of the UN established to prevent another Shoah but thereafter condemns Israel for genocide. The US Constitution established a Republic of economic autonomous States unto a post Civil War democracy wherein Washington mananged a Central Controlled economy.
The Articles of Confederation did not mandate an Executive Branch in the Central Government. The Framers envisioned a small Federal Government; their rebellion against the British King made them wary of a strong central authority. The post WWII Big Brother Federal Government serves as an example of what the Founding Fathers rebelled against the British Crown.
The Commerce Clause in the U.S. Constitution (Article I, Section 8) originally intended to give Congress the power to regulate commerce between the states and foreign nations – inter-state trade. Inter-State trade expanded to include trade and commerce between States of the Union regulated by Washington bureaucrats. Hence the Framers wrote the Commerce Clause with the intent to create a balance that would facilitate trade among states of the Union while preventing any single state monopoly from having undue influence over commerce. Hence the rejection of Central Government established monopolies, starting with a Central (Federal Reserve) Bank.
Lincoln, often considered the first Radical Republican, adopted measures that increased federal power during the Civil War, despite his initial respect for states’ rights. Lincoln’s Hamiltonian views concerning the establishment of a Federal banking monopoly crystalized in forcing Banks to keep Treasury Notes and the fiat Greenback currency, through which he financed the Civil War.
The post Civil War Inter-State Commerce Act institutionalized Washington as Big Brother over the States reduced to being “counties” within the Federal Government. Socialist Centralized Planning FDR would later initiate consequent to Wilson’s establishment of a Federal monopoly Federal Reserve. Small wonder that Wilson’s establishment of a Federally established private banking monopoly, a policy which mirrors European economic traditions, that the US almost immediately there after permanently joined the Allied military alliance, due to the huge loans the Federal Reserve gave to England and France, prior to the US joining the Allied Alliance. This fundamentally abrogated Washington’s command not for the US to join into any European alliance.
________________________________________________
________________________________________________
________________________________________________
משנה תורה קידושין פרק א סוגיה א
Having made a review of Boris Badenov, and Natasha Fatale, must now return back to the 2nd to last line of :ב.
דתנן: (בז’ דרכים), אתרוג שוה לאילן בג’ דרכים. ליתני דברים משום דבעינן מתני סיפא, ולירק דברך אחד. סיפא נמי ניתני דבר התם הא קמשמע לן דדרכיה דאתרוג כירק
Why do the halachic codifications compare to tits on a boar hog, when a student studies the Talmud? Reshonim and Acharonim scholarship prioritized learning halacha divorced from the Talmud. Hence their codes of halacha fails to learn halacha in context to how it serves as a precedent to interpret the original language of the Mishna. In this particular instance, does the maturity of a child impact the mitzva of קידושין. Our Villains, Badenov and Fatale argue that child rape through ביאה qualifies as kosher קידושין. The Gemara brings the בנין אב של אתרוג as a precedent proving that maturity determines the validity of mitzvot. The halachic statute law codifications have no awareness what so ever of how the Gemara employs halachic issues as precedents to re-interpret the original intent of the language of the Home Mishna. Herein the Reshonim and Acharonim scholarship took down stream generations off the דרך.
Recall that Natasha Fatale declared money as a rabbinic acquisition, it seems important to bring the RambaN’s commentary to this Gemara.
חדושי רבינו משה בן נחמן קידושין: בכסף בשטר ובביאה. דוקא נקט סידרא, דכתיב כי יקח היינו כסף והדר כתיב ובעלה, משום הכי אקדמיה לכסף מקמי ביאה. ושטר משום דדמי לכסף. שכן קונין בהן שאר דברים וקנינן מרובה, סמכו ענין לו, ואע”פ שבכתוב כסף וביאה סמוכין. ולמאי דמפקינן נמי כסף מויצאה חנם (לקמן ג,ב), ההיא לומר דקידושי דאה הוו, אבל מ”מ כסף דקני מכי יקח נפקא והדר ובעלה. ולר’ יוחנן (לקמן ט,ב) דמפיק ביאה מבעולת בעל, איכא למימר דכיון דעיקר כל קנין כסף הוא [מדרשא – הגראז] חביבא ליה ואקדמיה, א”נ כיון דכת’ כי יקח והדר ובעלה אקדמיה לכסף – money before intercourse.
In the matter of אתרוג the Torah raise the קום ועשה מצוה של ערלה. Boris Badenov’s statute halacha totally ignored this precedent of אתרוג in the acquisition of קידושין involving a minor child. His code divorced this key precedent and how the Amoraim employed it to interpret the intent of the language of the Mishna.
Natasha Fatale’s כסף משנה commentary absolutely failed to correct this gross fundamental socialist perversion made by Boris Badenov’s statue law halachic over-simplification, and שב ולא תעשה assimilation unto Greek\Roman statute law.
אתרוד שוה לאילן בג’ דרכים, לערלה ולרבעי ולשביעית. פירש רש”י ז”ל שערלה ורבעי נוהגין בו באילן [the initial formation of fruit]ולשביעית שהולכים בפירותיו אחר חנטה
,כאילן ולא אחר לקיטה כירק. ודקדקו עליו וליתני נמי לפאה ולשכחה דאי דמי לאילן ליתני ה’ אי דמי לירק דלא מחייב ליתני ג’ לירק. וזו אינה קודיא, דאי מחייב לאו דומיא דאילן הוא, דאיכא נמי ירק דמחייב, כל שמכניסו לקיום (פאה פ”ג מ”ד) כגון מלבנות הבצלים וחיטה וכל חמישה מינין דלאו אילן נינהו. ואי לא מחייב, לאו דומיא דירק הוא דליתני לירק, דאיכא אילן דלא מחייב כגון תאנה כדתנן בדוכתא (פאה פ”א מ”ד, פ”ג מ”ד) משום – הכילא תננהו – [fruits are gathered gradually]. This last clause introduces a completely different subject than maturity. The RambaN refers to their pattern of harvesting, not the ripening process whereas our Gemara, it seems to me, brings this precedent to address האשה נקנית as it applies to a daughter whom the father can sell without her consent.
A minor daughter has two qualities (1) he can sell her as a maid servant without her consent. (2) The person who acquires this “property” cannot acquire title to her Nefesh O’lam Ha’bah through bi’ah, till she has the maturity to possess the discernment of what this bi’ah acquires. Kiddushin through intercourse fundamentally requires da‘at; whereas kiddushin through money relates to the father’s authority. The authority of the father not a rabbinic fence around the Torah “authority”. כסף, שטר וביאה serve as angles of analysis on the mishnaic blueprint — each with different halachic implications tied to maturity, da‘at, and precedent. Bi’ah with a minor cannot sanctify kiddushin.
Our Gemara now makes a בנין אב גזרה שוו to :ר”ה יד:, וסוכה לט. A כלל in how the Gemara interprets the language of its Home Mishna, all halachic subjects raised by the Gemara function as בניני אבות precedents wherein the Amoraim interpret the k’vanna intent of the Mishnaic language. The Framers of the Talmud never had any intention to organize these precedent halachot into Greek/Roman statute shoe-box egg-crates. Furthermore, the editors of both the Bavli and Yerushalmi organized each and every sugya of Gemara as complete-intact-whole units. In this sense, a sugya of Gemara compares to a static bridge which spans a river. Static engineering far simpler than dynamic engineering; the former depends on linear geometry and algebra, whereas the latter requires Calculus variables and other forms of Higher mathematics.
A scholar needs to interpret the precedent sugya quickly in his effort to understand how this off the dof sugya serves as a changed perspective which views the shared גזרה שוו common denominator clause from a completely different angle as view from the Gemara of קידושין views this precedent viewed from a completely different perspective.
This Gemara כלל, how to understand the language of the Gemara across the Sha’s — Boris Badenov & Natasha Fatale triggered a ירידות הדורות domino effect which cursed all downstream generations with their Av tuma avoda zarah. The foreign alien Goyim theology whose substitution theology transposes Power AS God. Regardless of the dogma: Be it the Nicene Creed or the revelation of the Koran dictated by an Angel, both religions of avoda zara orbited the shared central axis of military conquest and Power. Wrapped ever so beautifully in the shiny deception of belief in God. Both religions made it a religious obligation to conquer the World and force all Man Kind to believe in their Universal monotheism Gods.
Each sugya of בנין אב Gemara has an opening Thesis Statement. A closing re-statement but re-phrased thesis statement. And all halachic issues raised within the body of the sugya exist somewhere along this two-point sugya sh’itta/line. This rigid fixed quality of each and every Gemara sugyot permits a scholar to make a syllogism three-point deductive reasoning to quickly grasp the angle of perspective of this בנין אב סודיה. The simplicity of the Framers design compares to the inherit rigid strength of a triangle.
_______________________________________
_______________________________________
_______________________________________
דתנן ר”ה: באחד בשבט ראש השנה לאילן כדברי בית שמאי. בה”א בחמישה עשר בו. גמ. סוגיה אחרונה לפני תנן: בארבע פרקים העולם דידון. דף יד: מ”ט אמר רבי אלעזר א”ר אושעיא הואיל ויצאו רוב גשמי שנה ועדיין רוב תקופה מבחוץ מאי קאמר? ה”ק אע”פ שרוב תקופה מבחוץ הואיל ויצאו רוב דשמי. ת”ר מעשה בר”ע שליקט אתרוג באחד בשבט ונהג בו שני עישורין אחד כדברי ב”ש ואחד כדברי ב”ה וגו’……. אמר רבי יוחנן נהגו העם בחרובין כרבי נחמיה איתיביה ר”ל לרבי יוחנן בנות שוח שביעתי שלהן שניה מפני שעושות לשליש השנים אישתיק ……… דתנן אתרוג שוה לאילן בג’ דרכים לערלה ולרבעי ולשביעית ולירק בדרך אחד שבשעת לקיטתו עישרו דברי ר”ג ר’ אליעזר אומר אתרוג שוה לאילן לכל דבר
העיקר — מה עושה הסוגיה של האתרוג? The Mishnah’s short formula — “אתרוג שוה לאילן בג’ דרכים — לערלה, לרביעי, ולשביעית; ולירק בדרך אחד” — not a botanical description but a legal index: some mitzvot treat the etrog like a tree (because they look to חנטה / formative moment) and some like a vegetable (because they look to לקיטה / the act of harvest). The Gemara then spins that hinge into a general method: when a mitzva’s norm is tied to formation/appearance we apply one set of rules; when it’s tied to picking/transfer we apply another.
איך זה מיישם את מישנת ראש-השנה (אחד־בחודש / ט״ו) How does this apply to the Mishnah of Rosh Hashanah (the first of the month / the 15th?
That dispute is fundamentally about which moment determines halachic belonging: the moment of חנטה / becoming part of the tree, or the moment of לקיטה / becoming gathered. When the Gemara records that people have customs (e.g. to follow בית שמאי או בית הלל or follow actual practices of איסוף), it is doing exactly the same juridical move as the etrog sugya: it asks which legal clock ticks for this mitzva. Thus the Rosh Ha-Shana Mishnah’s language about dates and customs is explained by the same binyan-av: the date that counts depends on which legal parameter the mitzva attaches to (formation vs harvest vs seasonal counting). The Gemara’s stories (e.g. about rabbi Akiva who picked etrog on one date and treated it by two sets of rules) illustrate that there are two different clocks and we must know which one the law attaches to.
מה זה עושה לגבי קידושין — “האשה נקנית בשלוש דרכים” Now connect the binyan-av: the Mishnah of קידושין lists three kinyanim (כסף, שטר, ביאה) — the Gemara’s job is to determine the kavvanah (legal parameter) each mode presupposes.
כסף (and שטר) behave like a property transfer — akin to crops harvested and stored. Their legal effect can depend on a property-type standard (the father’s authority, a contractual transfer), not on the woman’s personal subjective state. For many cases the law treats כסף as operating through the father’s guardianship: it can effect kiddushin of a minor under paternal kinyan because it’s a transferal-mechanism in the communal-property sense.
ביאה is fundamentally different: it is a personal, bodily act whose halachic efficacy attaches to the personhood and daʿat of the woman. The Gemara examines whether biʿah creates kiddushin when the woman lacks requisite daʿat or maturity. Using the etrog binyan-av, the Gemara shows that because ביאה’s “moment of effect” is like לקיטה tied to consent/active completion, it requires the agent’s halachic capability (daʿat). Therefore a sexual act with a child who lacks daʿat does not produce valid kiddushin; it is not a valid kinyan but assault.
איך האתרוג מהווה הוכחה-מודל (precedent) How the etrog serves as a proof-model (precedent). The etrog case is concrete precedent: for some mitzvot the decisive moment is חנטה (formation) — these are like sheviʿit/ערלה — and for others the decisive moment is לקיטה (harvest) — these are like maʿaser/קנין. The Amoraim import that distinction into family law: is kiddushin decided by a formation-type standard (family/paternal authority, like property) or by a person-centered standard (consent/daʿat)? The etrog sugya proves that the Talmud repeatedly uses agricultural categories as legal prototypes for other areas: if the halachic system chooses the formation-model, the rules follow that template; if it chooses the picking-model, the rules follow the other template.
התחביר ההלכתי של הכוונה The halakhic syntax of intention. Therefore the kavvanah of the Mishnah’s language in both places is institutional—specifying which legal template applies. In ר״ה the Mishnah’s dates and customs are shorthand telling us which temporal-template the law uses for that fruit/mitzva (formation vs harvest). In קידושין the Mishnah’s list of kinyanim is shorthand telling us which type of legal transaction we are dealing with — property-transfer vs person-centered transfer — and the Gemara uses etrog-style binyan-av to decide borderline cases (minors, absent daʿat, father’s sale).
דוגמה קצרה להמחשה A short example for illustration. Fig tree (תאנה): fruit is gathered gradually → no peah → behaves atypically for a “tree” → shows that botanical category ≠ legal category. Onions/wheat stored: vegetable-type plants that are obligated in peah → shows the opposite. Apply to kiddushin: a “formative” connection (father sells daughter) can create a legal effect with respect to כסף, even if the person lacks autonomous daʿat for ביאה.
מסקנה מעשית ומחשבתית A practical and intellectual conclusion. The Gemara’s sugya is not pedantic taxonomy — it gives the reader the legal hermeneutic: always ask “which legal clock / template does the mitzva/grant attach to?” Once you know the template, everything else follows. That is the kavvanah both of the ר״ה Mishnah (which temporal template applies?) and of the קידושין Mishnah (which acquisition-template applies?), and the etrog precedent is the canonical model the Amoraim employ to transfer that method from agriculture into family law.